Painful Genital Ulcers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Painful Genital Ulcers Photo Rounds Painful genital ulcers Richard P.Usatine, MD Vice Chair for Education, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio colleague came into the charting area and He had recently fallen in love, and was con- said he thought he had just seen his first cerned about these ulcers—he did not want to A case of chancroid. He asked me if I had a give her any diseases. They had only kissed so far moment to see the patient, a 32-year-old African and he wanted to know what he should tell her. American man who noted the onset of painful He said he had never had sex with men or inject- sores on his penis 1 week ago. The patient con- ed any drugs. He has had a number of serially sented to a second opinion. On further question- monogamous relationships and reported no other ing, he remembered a tingling pain that started a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk factors. few days prior to the sores. When asked about any The patient was a healthy-looking young man. previous outbreaks, he thought he may have had Examination of his penis (Figure 1) showed the something like this 1 year ago. He did not remem- ulcers clearly visible (Figure 2). He had only shot- ber seeing blisters before the sores appeared. ty inguinal adenopathy that was nontender. The last time the patient had sexual relations was 2 months ago, with someone he met at a ■ WHAT IS THE DIAGNOSIS? party. He claimed he used a condom. He did not have any lesions at that time and had never had a ■ WHAT IS THE TREATMENT sexually transmitted disease before. ANDPREVENTIONSTRATEGY? FIGURE 1 Painful sores on the genitals FIGURE 2 Close-up of ulcers on the penis The patient noted the onset of these sores on his penis The sores had shotty inguinal adenopathy that was 1 week previous. nontender. DECEMBER 2003 / VOL 52, NO 12 · The Journal of Family Practice 951 PHOTO ROUNDS ■ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Other characteristics to look for The most likely causes of painful genital ulcers in All of these sexually transmitted diseases can this case are herpes simplex, chancroid, and cause tender painful adenopathy, which is partic- syphilis. Granuloma inguinale and lymphogranu- ularly characteristic of chancroid and LGV. loma venereum (LGV) are rare causes of genital Suppurative inguinal adenopathy with painful ulceration in the United States. A zipper accident genital ulcers is almost pathognomonic of chan- or other trauma can cause genital ulceration, but croid. With LGV, there may be a self-limited the patient should be able to give a clear history genital ulcer at the site of inoculation, which is of such an event. often gone by the time a patient seeks care. By epidemiology alone, the order of likelihood Granuloma inguinale causes painless, progres- for the cause of any genital ulceration is herpes, sive ulcerative lesions without regional lym- syphilis, then chancroid. phadenopathy. These lesions are highly vascular (with a characteristic beefy red appearance) and This case points to herpes bleed easily on contact.1 While HIV can be spread Herpes simplex is by far the most common cause more easily with open genital ulcerations, HIV of painful genital ulcers in the United States; at alone does not cause genital ulcerations. least 50 million people have genital herpes sim- plex virus (HSV) infection.1 The features of this ■ LABORATORY EXAMINATION case pointing to herpes are the appearance of Herpes multiple ulcers, the tingling pain that preceded All patients with genital ulcers thought to be the ulcers, and the history of a possible episode in from an STD should be tested for syphilis and the preceding year. While it would be helpful to HIV regardless of other risk factors.1 This have a history of blisters that preceded the ulcers, patient should additionally be tested for herpes the evidence still points to herpes as the most simplex. A bacteriologic test for chancroid is likely diagnosis. not necessary, but the clinician who first saw the patient asked that we conduct the test for Could it be syphilis? chancroid—a culture for the Haemophilus While the primary chancre of syphilis is classical- ducreyi bacterium. ly described as painless, the patient with syphilis Isolation of HSV in cell culture is the preferred may experience pain. Syphilis tends to present as virologic test for patients with genital ulcers.1 a single ulcer but may cause multiple ulcers. Unfortunately, the sensitivity of culture declines rapidly as lesions begin to heal, usually within a Why not chancroid? few days of onset. Direct fluorescent antibody Chancroid may also cause multiple small painful tests are also available. Both herpes culture and ulcers. However, the ulcers of chancroid tend the direct fluorescent antibody test distinguish to be deeper than those of herpes and bleed HSV-1 from HSV-2. Polymerase chain reaction more easily. assays for HSV DNA are highly sensitive, but ■ SUBMITTING IMAGES TO PHOTO ROUNDS Do you have images (slides, prints, digitized photos) of compelling clinical cases of interest to family physicians? We would like to publish them, along with a brief description of the clinical presentation and a diagnostic question for readers. The case should include information on the differential diagnosis and treatment, the latter applying an evidence-based approach supported by cur- rent references. Submit electronic files to [email protected], or send high-quality slides and prints to: Richard P. Usatine, MD, Editor, Photo Rounds, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Family and Community Medicine, MC 7794, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900. 952 DECEMBER 2003 / VOL 52, NO 12 · The Journal of Family Practice PHOTO ROUNDS their role in the diagnosis of genital ulcer disease the first clinical episode of genital herpes: has not been well-defined. • Acyclovir 400 mg orally, 3 times daily for 7–10 Most cases of recurrent genital herpes are days or until clinically resolved, OR caused by HSV-2. Specific serologic testing can • Acyclovir 200 mg orally, 5 times daily for 7–10 be expensive, and is not needed at the time of days or until clinically resolved, OR the initial virologic screening. However, consid- • Famciclovir 250 mg orally, 3 times daily for er ordering the test at a subsequent visit, 7–10 days or until clinically resolved, OR because the distinction between HSV serotypes • Valacyclovir 1 g orally, twice daily for 7–10 days influences prognosis and counseling. Also, or until clinically resolved. because false-negative HSV cultures are com- mon—especially with recurrent infection or Topical acyclovir is less effective than the oral healing lesions—type-specific serologic tests formulaton and its use is discouraged. are useful for confirming a diagnosis of genital The suspicion for syphilis is too low to warrant herpes.1 Herpes serologies can also be used to an intramuscular shot of penicillin, which is help manage sexual partners of persons with painful and can cause anaphylaxis in some genital herpes. patients. The likelihood of chancroid is too low to prescribe an oral antibiotic such as erythromycin. Syphilis The patient wanted empirical treatment for The Venereal Disease Research Laboratory herpes. He was given valacyclovir, 1 gm for 7 (VDRL) test or rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test days, taken twice daily, with the option to call in should be used to detect syphilis. Both tests are for more if the ulcers did not resolve by day 7. used for nonspecific screening only, because He was told he might apply petrolatum and they measure anticardiolipin antibodies. A posi- clean gauze to the ulcers to diminish the pain tive result should be confirmed with a specific when open ulcers rub against underwear. treponemal test such as a fluorescent trepone- Acetaminophen or other analgesics were recom- mal antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS). mended for pain, and he was advised to avoid The results of these laboratory tests are not sexual activity until the ulcers had fully healed. available immediately during the patient’s visit. If there was a high suspicion for syphilis, a dark ■ PREVENTING TRANSMISSION field examination from the ulcer exudate could The patient is appropriately concerned about the be used to look for spirochetes while the patient transmission of this condition to a new partner. was still in the office. In this case, the suspicion Not having a firm diagnosis makes definitive for syphilis was low. counseling more difficult. However, general principles of safe sex and condom use were ■ TREATMENT: ANTIVIRALS discussed. On the follow-up visit the patient was The major question is whether the patient should told that the result of his herpes test was positive be treated empirically with medication. The most for HSV-2. Results of his RPR, HIV antibody test, likely diagnosis is herpes simplex. Randomized and H ducreyi culture were all negative. trials indicate that 3 antiviral medications— Information about condom use was reinforced, acyclovir, famciclovir, and valacyclovir—provide and the patient was told there is definitive clinical benefit for genital herpes (level of evidence that condom use does diminish the risk evidence [LOE]=1a).1 of transmission of herpes from a man to a woman The Centers for Disease Control and (LOE=1b).2 That same study did not show that Prevention (CDC) 2002 treatment guidelines for condom use prevents transmission from women STDs recommend the following medications for to men. Also, changes in sexual behavior, DECEMBER 2003 / VOL 52, NO 12 · The Journal of Family Practice 953 PHOTO ROUNDS THETHE JOURNALJOURNAL OFOF FAMILY correlated with counseling about avoiding sex when a partner has lesions, were associated with PRACTICE reduction in HSV-2 acquisition over time 2 (LOE=1b).
Recommended publications
  • Reporting of Diseases and Conditions Regulation, Amendment, M.R. 289/2014
    THE PUBLIC HEALTH ACT LOI SUR LA SANTÉ PUBLIQUE (C.C.S.M. c. P210) (c. P210 de la C.P.L.M.) Reporting of Diseases and Conditions Règlement modifiant le Règlement sur la Regulation, amendment déclaration de maladies et d'affections Regulation 289/2014 Règlement 289/2014 Registered December 23, 2014 Date d'enregistrement : le 23 décembre 2014 Manitoba Regulation 37/2009 amended Modification du R.M. 37/2009 1 The Reporting of Diseases and 1 Le présent règlement modifie le Conditions Regulation , Manitoba Règlement sur la déclaration de maladies et Regulation 37/2009, is amended by this d'affections , R.M. 37/2009. regulation. 2 Schedules A and B are replaced with 2 Les annexes A et B sont remplacées Schedules A and B to this regulation. par les annexes A et B du présent règlement. Coming into force Entrée en vigueur 3 This regulation comes into force on 3 Le présent règlement entre en vigueur January 1, 2015, or on the day it is registered le 1 er janvier 2015 ou à la date de son under The Statutes and Regulations Act , enregistrement en vertu de Loi sur les textes whichever is later. législatifs et réglementaires , si cette date est postérieure. December 19, 2014 Minister of Health/La ministre de la Santé, 19 décembre 2014 Sharon Blady 1 SCHEDULE A (Section 1) 1 The following diseases are diseases requiring contact notification in accordance with the disease-specific protocol. Common name Scientific or technical name of disease or its infectious agent Chancroid Haemophilus ducreyi Chlamydia Chlamydia trachomatis (including Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) serovars) Gonorrhea Neisseria gonorrhoeae HIV Human immunodeficiency virus Syphilis Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum Tuberculosis Mycobacterium tuberculosis Mycobacterium africanum Mycobacterium canetti Mycobacterium caprae Mycobacterium microti Mycobacterium pinnipedii Mycobacterium bovis (excluding M.
    [Show full text]
  • Syphilis Staging and Treatment Syphilis Is a Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Caused by the Treponema Pallidum Bacterium
    Increasing Early Syphilis Cases in Illinois – Syphilis Staging and Treatment Syphilis is a sexually transmitted disease (STD) caused by the Treponema pallidum bacterium. Syphilis can be separated into four different stages: primary, secondary, early latent, and late latent. Ocular and neurologic involvement may occur during any stage of syphilis. During the incubation period (time from exposure to clinical onset) there are no signs or symptoms of syphilis, and the individual is not infectious. Incubation can last from 10 to 90 days with an average incubation period of 21 days. During this period, the serologic testing for syphilis will be non-reactive but known contacts to early syphilis (that have been exposed within the past 90 days) should be preventatively treated. Syphilis Stages Primary 710 (CDC DX Code) Patient is most infectious Chancre (sore) must be present. It is usually marked by the appearance of a single sore, but multiple sores are common. Chancre appears at the spot where syphilis entered the body and is usually firm, round, small, and painless. The chancre lasts three to six weeks and will heal without treatment. Without medical attention the infection progresses to the secondary stage. Secondary 720 Patient is infectious This stage typically begins with a skin rash and mucous membrane lesions. The rash may manifest as rough, red, or reddish brown spots on the palms of the hands, soles of the feet, and/or torso and extremities. The rash does usually does not cause itching. Rashes associated with secondary syphilis can appear as the chancre is healing or several weeks after the chancre has healed.
    [Show full text]
  • Disseminated Mycobacterium Tuberculosis with Ulceronecrotic Cutaneous Disease Presenting As Cellulitis Kelly L
    Lehigh Valley Health Network LVHN Scholarly Works Department of Medicine Disseminated Mycobacterium Tuberculosis with Ulceronecrotic Cutaneous Disease Presenting as Cellulitis Kelly L. Reed DO Lehigh Valley Health Network, [email protected] Nektarios I. Lountzis MD Lehigh Valley Health Network, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlyworks.lvhn.org/medicine Part of the Dermatology Commons, and the Medical Sciences Commons Published In/Presented At Reed, K., Lountzis, N. (2015, April 24). Disseminated Mycobacterium Tuberculosis with Ulceronecrotic Cutaneous Disease Presenting as Cellulitis. Poster presented at: Atlantic Dermatological Conference, Philadelphia, PA. This Poster is brought to you for free and open access by LVHN Scholarly Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in LVHN Scholarly Works by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Disseminated Mycobacterium Tuberculosis with Ulceronecrotic Cutaneous Disease Presenting as Cellulitis Kelly L. Reed, DO and Nektarios Lountzis, MD Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania Case Presentation: Discussion: Patient: 83 year-old Hispanic female Cutaneous tuberculosis (CTB) was first described in the literature in 1826 by Laennec and has since been History of Present Illness: The patient presented to the hospital for chest pain and shortness of breath and was treated for an NSTEMI. She was noted reported to manifest in a variety of clinical presentations. The most common cause is infection with the to have redness and swelling involving the right lower extremity she admitted to having for 5 months, which had not responded to multiple courses of antibiotics. She acid-fast bacillus Mycobacterium tuberculosis via either primary exogenous inoculation (direct implantation resided in Puerto Rico but recently moved to the area to be closer to her children.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf/Bookshelf NBK368467.Pdf
    BMJ 2019;365:l4159 doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4159 (Published 28 June 2019) Page 1 of 11 Practice BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.l4159 on 28 June 2019. Downloaded from PRACTICE CLINICAL UPDATES Syphilis OPEN ACCESS Patrick O'Byrne associate professor, nurse practitioner 1 2, Paul MacPherson infectious disease specialist 3 1School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5, Canada; 2Sexual Health Clinic, Ottawa Public Health, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5P9; 3Division of Infectious Diseases, Ottawa Hospital General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario What you need to know Box 1: Symptoms of syphilis by stage of infection (see fig 1) • Incidence rates of syphilis have increased substantially around the Primary world, mostly affecting men who have sex with men and people infected • Symptoms appear 10-90 days (mean 21 days) after exposure with HIV http://www.bmj.com/ • Main symptom is a <2 cm chancre: • Have a high index of suspicion for syphilis in any sexually active patient – Progresses from a macule to papule to ulcer over 7 days with genital lesions or rashes – Painless, solitary, indurated, clean base (98% specific, 31% sensitive) • Primary syphilis classically presents as a single, painless, indurated genital ulcer (chancre), but this presentation is only 31% sensitive; – On glans, corona, labia, fourchette, or perineum lesions can be painful, multiple, and extra-genital – A third are extragenital in men who have sex with men and in women • Diagnosis is usually based on serology, using a combination of treponemal and non-treponemal tests. Syphilis remains sensitive to • Localised painless adenopathy benzathine penicillin G Secondary on 24 September 2021 by guest.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonbacterial Pus-Forming Diseases of the Skin Robert Jackson,* M.D., F.R.C.P[C], Ottawa, Ont
    Nonbacterial pus-forming diseases of the skin Robert Jackson,* m.d., f.r.c.p[c], Ottawa, Ont. Summary: The formation of pus as a Things are not always what they seem Fungus result of an inflammatory response Phaedrus to a bacterial infection is well known. North American blastomycosis, so- Not so well appreciated, however, The purpose of this article is to clarify called deep mycosis, can present with a is the fact that many other nonbacterial the clinical significance of the forma¬ verrucous proliferating and papilloma- agents such as certain fungi, viruses tion of pus in various skin diseases. tous plaque in which can be seen, par- and parasites may provoke pus Usually the presence of pus in or on formation in the skin. Also heat, the skin indicates a bacterial infection. Table I.Causes of nonbacterial topical applications, systemically However, by no means is this always pus-forming skin diseases administered drugs and some injected true. From a diagnostic and therapeutic Fungus materials can do likewise. Numerous point of view it is important that physi¬ skin diseases of unknown etiology cians be aware of the nonbacterial such as pustular acne vulgaris, causes of pus-forming skin diseases. North American blastomycosis pustular psoriasis and pustular A few definitions are required. Pus dermatitis herpetiformis can have is a yellowish [green]-white, opaque, lymphangitic sporotrichosis bacteriologically sterile pustules. The somewhat viscid matter (S.O.E.D.). Pus- cervicofacial actinomycosis importance of considering nonbacterial forming diseases are those in which Intermediate causes of pus-forming conditions of pus can be seen macroscopicaily.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Case Definitions Infectious Disease
    Arizona Department of Health Services Case Definitions for Reportable Communicable Morbidities 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Definition of Terms Used in Case Classification .......................................................................................................... 6 Definition of Bi-national Case ............................................................................................................................................. 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ............................................... 7 AMEBIASIS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 ANTHRAX (β) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 ASEPTIC MENINGITIS (viral) ......................................................................................................................................... 11 BASIDIOBOLOMYCOSIS ................................................................................................................................................. 12 BOTULISM, FOODBORNE (β) ....................................................................................................................................... 13 BOTULISM, INFANT (β) ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable Disease Surveillance in Virginia, 2013
    Reportable Disease Surveillance in Virginia, 2013 Marissa J. Levine, MD, MPH State Health Commissioner Report Production Team: Division of Surveillance and Investigation, Division of Disease Prevention, Division of Environmental Epidemiology, and Division of Immunization Virginia Department of Health Post Office Box 2448 Richmond, Virginia 23218 www.vdh.virginia.gov ACKNOWLEDGEMENT In addition to the employees of the work units listed below, the Office of Epidemiology would like to acknowledge the contributions of all those engaged in disease surveillance and control activities across the state throughout the year. We appreciate the commitment to public health of all epidemiology staff in local and district health departments and the Regional and Central Offices, as well as the conscientious work of nurses, environmental health specialists, infection preventionists, physicians, laboratory staff, and administrators. These persons report or manage disease surveillance data on an ongoing basis and diligently strive to control morbidity in Virginia. This report would not be possible without the efforts of all those who collect and follow up on morbidity reports. Divisions in the Virginia Department of Health Office of Epidemiology Disease Prevention Telephone: 804-864-7964 Environmental Epidemiology Telephone: 804-864-8182 Immunization Telephone: 804-864-8055 Surveillance and Investigation Telephone: 804-864-8141 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Genital Herpes and Human Immunodeficiency Virus
    Genital herpes and human immunodeficiency virus: double trouble Connie Celum,1 Ruth Levine,2 Marcia Weaver,3 & Anna Wald1 Abstract The synergistic relationship between herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) and transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can be substantial in developing countries that have high prevalences of both viral infections. Genital herpes, most frequently caused by HSV-2, has become the leading cause of genital ulcer disease worldwide. This review of recent research on genital herpes and enhanced susceptibility to, and transmission of, HIV is part of the “Advances in HIV/AIDS research series” which endeavours to form a bridge between the research into HIV and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and the practice of HIV/AIDS prevention, care and support in developing countries. Research findings have shown that being seropositive for HSV-2 can increase the risk of HIV acquisition among high-risk HIV-negative people exposed to HIV and, likewise, the infectiousness of individuals co-infected with HIV-1 and HSV-2 can increase during periods of HSV-2 reactivation. These observations have led to the initiation of several intervention trials and could ultimately lead to the setting of new priorities in public health and clinical practice. WHO has recently issued new guidelines for the syndromic management of genital ulcer disease that include antiviral treatment for lesions consistent with genital herpes. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued updated Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines in 2002 that recommended the use of type-specific serological tests for diagnosing HSV-2. Recently launched proof-of-concept, HSV-2 intervention trials in several countries will help to determine the proportion of new HIV infections that could be prevented by suppression of HSV-2, and the findings from these studies will inform those involved in setting prevention and treatment priorities and strategies in developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 3- Chlamydia, Syphilis & Gonorrhea (STD)
    3- Chlamydia, syphilis & gonorrhea (STD) Microbiology 435’s Teamwork Reproductive Block Learning Objectives: ● Know the causative agents of syphilis, gonorrhea and Chlamydia infections. ● Realize that these three infections are acquired through sexual intercourse. ● Know the pathogenesis of syphilis, gonorrhea and Chlamydia infection. ● Describe the clinical feature of the primary, secondary tertiary syphilis and complications. ● Recall the different diagnostic methods for the different stages of syphilis. ● Describe the clinical features of gonorrhea that affect only men, only women and those ones which affect both sexes. ● Describe the different laboratory tests for the diagnosis of gonorrhea ● Describe the morphology and the distinct life cycle of the Chlamydia. ● Realize what are the different genera, species and serotypes of the family Chlamydophila. ● Recognize that Chlamydia cause different diseases that affect the eye (causing trachoma) and the respiratory system (mainly cause a typical pneumonia). ● Know the different urogenital clinical syndromes caused by Chlamydia trachomatis that affect men, women and both sex. ● Realize that these urogenital syndromes are difficult to differentiate clinically from the similar ones caused by N.gonorrheae. ● Know the treatment of syphilis, gonorrhea and Chlamydia infections. ● Realize that there are no effective vaccines against all these three diseases. Important Resources: 435 females & males slides and ​ ​ ​ Males notes notes, wikipedia, ​ ​ Females notes Lippincott’s Illustrated Reviews: Microbiology- ​ ​ Extra Third Edition ​ ​ Editing file: Here ​ ​ Credit: Team members ​ Introduction (take-home message) ● Syphilis, Chlamydia and Gonorrhea are main STDs, caused by delicate organisms that cannot survive ​ ​ ​ outside the body. Infection may not be localized. ​ ​ ● Clinical presentation may be similar (urethral or genital discharge, ulcers). ● One or more organisms (Bacteria, virus, parasite) may be transmitted by sexual contact.
    [Show full text]
  • LGV CEG June 2020
    Sandyford Protocols Lymphogranuloma Venereum and Proctitis (LGV – see also Genital Ulcer Protocol) LGV must be tested in MSM with rectal symptoms and/or who are HIV positive LGV accounts for about 5% of the rectal Chlamydia detections in MSM in Glasgow. Management Confirmed cases First line: Doxycycline 100mg po bd 21 days NB warn re photosensitivity, oesophageal ulceration Second Line: Erythromycin 500 mg QDS for 21 days or Azithromycin 1g po stat followed by 1g weekly for three weeks Contact management Doxycycline 100mg po bd 21 days (Offer if sexual contact with a case of LGV within 4 weeks before onset of symptoms in index case or contact in last three months if asymptomatic LGV in an index case) Certain medications including fluconazole, macrolide and quinolone antibiotics cause QT prolongation and should not be prescribed with interacting medications. This is unlikely to be of clinical significance for stat doses but is important for longer courses. Please use BNF Interaction Checker to ensure these medications are safe to prescribe for your patient and discuss with a senior colleague if necessary. LGV epidemiology: LGV is caused by lymphotropic invasive strains of C.trachomatis (serovars L1,2,3) is now established as endemic in MSM in UK (the L2b strain is the dominant strain) Approximately 80 cases per quarter in UK Over 2000 cases to 2012 99% MSM LGV cases 8 times more likely to be HIV+ than non LGV Chlamydia cases Strong association with sex-party scene (traumatic sex, toys, fisting and enema use where shared equipment) 78% of cases are HIV+.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulvar Ulcers
    ULCERS painless painful Vulvar Ulcers Lyne/e J. Margesson MD FRCPC Interna<onal Congress of Dermatology ISSVD Sister Society Mee<ng Buenos Aires, Argen<na syphilis April 14, 2017 Aphthae NO CONFLICTS Ulcer: Ulcer Erosion Result of full thickness loss of epidermis painful extending into dermis or deeper • Always secondary phenomenon • From Destruction, Necrosis, Inflammation (as in syphilis, aphthae, or tumor) 1 Erosion VULVAR ULCERS Result of loss of all or part of epidermis only ■ MULTIPLE causes spanning a variety of ages, ethnic groups, geographical regions • Result of broken vesicles, pustules or bullae ■ Differing pathologies may co-exist ■ NOT SPECIFIC ■ Classification of vulvar ulcers is difficult Vesicle or Bulla - Intraepidermal - contact dermatitis, Staph Sub epidermal - bullous disease, drug eruption Pustule: Candida, HSV Causes of Vulvar Ulcers Syndromic Approach § Used in areas where no good testing is available Infectious ulcers - commonest STIs # 1 – HSV § Lessens the dependence on laboratory tests # 2 – Syphilis (saves time and money) # 3 - Chancroid - Africa – chancroid Granuloma Inguinale - New Guinea – very rare North America § Simplifies a complex diagnostic process Non-infectious ulcers § Permits the treatment to begin immediately - Skin disorders – Aphthae, Crohn’s Disease, Trauma, cancer § STDs included are variable depending on locally prevalent STDs 2 Syndromic Protocol for Genital Ulcer Disease Commonest Causes of Vulvar Ulcers Patient complains of genital sore Infectious Non-infectious Counsel Take history and
    [Show full text]
  • Young Adults Young Adults (20 - 35 Years)
    YOUNG ADULTS YOUNG ADULTS (20 - 35 YEARS) A large number of skin diseases reach their peak of expression during the young adult years, and these individuals also represent a large and growing proportion of the South African population, in common with other developing countries. Young adults are especially distressed by skin conditions that are uncomfortable, disfiguring or contagious. This group has also been severely affected by HIV/AIDS, with a consequent increase in the frequency and severity of the HIV- associated dermatoses. Some of these conditions have been discussed in other sections of this review. ACNE KELOIDALIS Inflammatory papules and pustules located mainly on the nape of the neck and occiput characterise this acne-like condition. It primarily affects black males. The lesions heal with scarring, creating huge keloids if this tendency exists. The cause is unknown, and unlikely to result from repeated shaving or short hair cutting. It DENGA A MAKHADO may be caused by unusually thick collagen, which traps and disrupts terminal MB ChB, FCDerm (SA) hair follicles. Treatment is not very successful, and large keloids are best excised Consultant Dermatologist by a surgeon. Mild cases can be helped by intralesional injection of steroids like Division of Dermatology Celestone Soluspan into individual papules and scars. Long-term oral tetracy- clines, as for acne, can also be beneficial, as can topical antibiotics like erythro- University of the Witwatersrand and mycin and clindamycin. Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital Johannesburg ACNE VULGARIS Denga Anna Makhado is a consultant der- There has been a recent tendency for acne to persist beyond the teens, or even matologist at Chris Hani Baragwanath occur for the first time in adulthood, called persistent adult acne.
    [Show full text]