DOCSLIB.ORG

Pruning of Meadowsweet and Steeplebush Landscapes, It Is Important to Know How to Manage Them for Optimal Kelly M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pruning of Meadowsweet and Steeplebush Landscapes, It Is Important to Know How to Manage Them for Optimal Kelly M If they are to be used in more formal Pruning of Meadowsweet and Steeplebush landscapes, it is important to know how to manage them for optimal Kelly M. Stanton1, Sally S. Weeks2, Michael N. Dana1, and growth, form, and flowering. 1,3 Meadowsweet and steeplebush Michael V. Mickelbart produce summer flowers from new growth. Catchpole (1963) gives rec- ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Spiraea alba, Spiraea tomentosa, hardhack, native plants, ommendations for pruning japanese growth, flowering spirea (Spiraea japonica), margitae spirea (Spiraea ·margaritae), and SUMMARY. Two native shrubs, meadowsweet (Spiraea alba) and steeplebush menzie’s spirea (Spiraea douglasii Spiraea tomentosa ( ), are currently grown for use in habitat restoration. Pruning var. ), all of which have could improve their form and encourage use in more formal gardens. Two seedling menziesii populations of each species were grown in the field or in containers outdoors. In similar growth and flowering habits Mar. 2009, plants were pruned to 3 or 15 cm or were left unpruned. By to meadowsweet and steeplebush. midsummer, there was no effect of pruning on plant height in field-grown plants. Catchpole (1963) recommended that However, pruning did eliminate lateral growth in field plants and, therefore, plants be pruned to ground level in improved overall form of the plants. Meadowsweet pruned to 3 cm had about half as April to promote the growth of new, many inflorescences as did meadowsweet pruned to 15 cm, with unpruned plants flower-bearing shoots. If they are not producing an intermediate number of inflorescences. Pruning container plants to 3 pruned, they accumulate dead wood, cm resulted in plants that were about half the height of unpruned plants, and total and flowering is reduced. Pruning biomass was greatly reduced. In general, plants that were pruned had fewer them to half-height still encourages inflorescences, although the total number of inflorescences in all plants was small. new growth but allows the develop- Pruning resulted in lower quality plant form in container plants. Species and seed sources within species responded similarly to pruning. Based on the data collected in ment of a larger plant. To date, this study, newly planted meadowsweet and steeplebush should be pruned to however, there are no similar pub- achieve good form in the first year. Despite the sometimes leggy growth habit in lished reports or recommendations containers, these species should not be pruned before growing out in the spring, or on pruning strategies for meadow- maximum growth and good form will not be attained. sweet or steeplebush. Pruning could eliminate apical dominance, resulting in shrubs with ative plants are a potential wide. They produce long-lasting ter- more branches and thus a fuller, more source of new plants for man- minal inflorescences on their vertical attractive appearance. Because the Naged landscapes. There is in- stems from mid-June (meadowsweet) inflorescences of meadowsweet and terest in gardening with natives not and mid-July (steeplebush) through steeplebush form on the stem tips, only for their novelty, but also to take August in the upper midwestern U.S. increasing the number of branches advantage of their adaptation to local (Swink and Wilhelm, 1994). Mead- could also increase the number of climates, to reflect regional differ- owsweet produces white flowers and flowers. ences, and to foster a connection with steeplebush has pale pink flowers. Meadowsweet and steeplebush nature (West, 2001). Native plants Both species send up numerous basal can tolerate mowing (White, 1955). can also be grown as an alternative stems, with little branching. Mead- In Quebec, when established plants to potentially invasive exotic land- owsweet is thicket forming (Meilleur of steeplebush were mown before scape plants. Consumers are willing et al., 1997). Meadowsweet has also spring growth was initiated, they to pay premium prices for an attrac- been found to be highly attractive to grew 30 cm by late July (Hay, tive garden featuring native plants insects that prey upon or parasitize 1958), indicating that these species (Helfand et al., 2006). insect herbivores (Fiedler and Landis, might respond well to severe pruning. The shrubs meadowsweet and 2007). These species tend to have asym- steeplebush are native to eastern North Steeplebush was used in the land- metrical, lateral growth in the nurs- America, and can be found growing scape as early as 1736 (Symes, 1983), ery. If these plants are to be sold in from the Gulf States into Canada (U.S. and meadowsweet and steeplebush retail nurseries, this appearance would Department of Agriculture, 2007). have potential as landscape plants. likely deter consumers from purchase. Meadowsweet and steeplebush grow Today, both species are used pri- If pruning after 1 year could im- to be 1 to 1.5 m tall and equally as marily in habitat restoration and prove plant appearance, these spe- less intensively managed areas where ciesmightbemoresuitableforretail We thank JFNew and Possibility Place Nursery for growth form is relatively unimportant. sales. Likewise, recommendations for supplying plants. Rob Eddy and Daniel Hahn assisted with container plant growth and maintenance. Jay Young and Nathan Linder assisted with setup and plot maintenance in the field. Mike Gosney provided Units technical advice and help. Meghan Honerlaw explained To convert U.S. to SI, To convert SI to U.S., statistics and SAS. multiply by U.S. unit SI unit multiply by 1 Department of Horticulture and Landscape Archi- 0.3048 ft m 3.2808 tecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 3.7854 gal L 0.2642 2Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, 2.54 inch(es) cm 0.3937 Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 16.3871 inch3 cm3 0.0610 3Corresponding author. E-mail: mickelbart@purdue. 28.3495 oz g 0.0353 edu. (°F – 32) O 1.8 °F °C(1.8·C) + 32 700 • August 2010 20(4) early development of plant form in were transplanted into 1.5-L con- July 2009 and was dried to a constant the landscape might make these tainers on 11 Oct. 2008. The con- weight at 60 °C for determination of plants more attractive to landscapers tainers were overwintered outside dry weight. and homeowners. To determine suit- under mulch to a depth of at least DATA ANALYSIS. Data were ana- able pruning-management strategies 5 cm above soil level. The plants were lyzed using SAS (version 9.1; SAS for young meadowsweet and steeple- pruned 3 cm above media level or left Institute, Cary, NC). The significance bush, plants in containers and the field unpruned as a control. Pruning was of the differences among the treat- were pruned to various heights, and done on 24 Mar. 2009 immediately ments or seed sources was determined the resulting growth, form, and flow- after removing mulch from the con- from analysis of variance and Tukey ering of the plants were measured. tainers. Two weeks after pruning, 7 g tests were conducted with PROC of the 22N–2.2P–5K fertilizer (1.5 g GLM. The significance of the effects Materials and methods of N) was applied to each container. of the treatments on the frequencies of FIELD EXPERIMENT. All plants The plants were irrigated by hand as form rating was determined by using used in the experiments were supplied needed. Fisher’s exact test in PROC FREQ. as 15-inch3 plugs grown by commer- The experiment was a two-way cial nurseries from seeds germinated factorial arrangement on a random- Results in Spring 2008. Seeds of both species ized complete block design with 12 FIELD EXPERIMENT. Meadow- were collected by the nurseries in Will blocks. Each block contained two sweet and steeplebush produced ir- County, IL, and Jackson County, MI pruning treatments applied to plants regular and lateral growth in the (hereafter IL and MI, respectively). of both seed sources of both species. crowded conditions of the plug trays. Both seed sources of each species were MEASUREMENTS. Growth, flow- However, when plugs were planted used in the container experiments, but ering, and form ratings were collected in the field, most of the new growth only the IL source of steeplebush was for both experiments from 2 to 4 June produced in Summer 2009 was verti- used in the field experiment. and 20 to 24 July 2009. By early June, cal. Pruning to 15 or 3 cm did not The experiment was conducted most of the plants had produced affect the midseason height of plants at the Meigs Farm of the Throckmor- vigorous spring growth, but few had from different seed sources of either ton Purdue Agricultural Center in begun flowering. July measurements species (Table 1). However, because Tippecanoe County, IN (lat. 40.29 °N, were conducted when plants had much of the lateral growth was re- long. 86.88 °W). The soil type was attained their full size for the growing moved with pruning, the width of Drummer (silty clay loam) with a pH season and were blooming. pruned plants was less than unpruned of 6.9. Height was determined as the plants (Table 1). More of the pruned Plugs were planted on 28 Oct. vertical distance from the soil (field) plants were characterized as symmet- 2008, and they were pruned on 24 or media (container) level to the tall- rical compared with plants that were Mar. 2009. On 8 Apr. 2009, they est living part of the plant. For the not pruned (Table 2). Although the were fertilized with 12 g of 22N– field experiment, plant width was plants were smaller, they had a more 2.2P–5K 4- to 5-month controlled- measured in north-south and east- compact and full appearance. release fertilizer with micronutrients west axes, and the average was taken. The young plants used in this (2.6 g of N; Scotts, Marysville, OH).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Filipendula Ulmaria (L.) Maxim
    6 May 2020 EMA/HMPC/595722/2019 Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) Addendum to Assessment report on Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim. (= Spiraea ulmaria L.), herba Rapporteur(s) B Kroes Assessor(s) Jan van der Nat Peer-reviewer J Wiesner HMPC decision on review of monograph Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim. (= Spiraea 30 January 2018 ulmaria L.), herba adopted on July 2011 Call for scientific data (start and end date) From 30 April 2018 to 31 July 2018 Adoption by Committee on Herbal Medicinal 6 May 2020 Products (HMPC) Review of new data on Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim., herba Periodic review (from 2011 to 2018) Scientific data (e.g. non-clinical and clinical safety data, clinical efficacy data) Pharmacovigilance data (e.g. data from EudraVigilance, VigiBase, national databases) Scientific/Medical/Toxicological databases: Scopus, PubMed, Embase, ToxNet Other Regulatory practice Old market overview in AR (i.e. products fulfilling 30/15 years on the market) New market overview (including pharmacovigilance actions taken in member states) – information from Member States (reporting between November 2018 and January 2019): Official address Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 ● 1083 HS Amsterdam ● The Netherlands Address for visits and deliveries Refer to www.ema.europa.eu/how-to-find-us Send us a question Go to www.ema.europa.eu/contact Telephone +31 (0)88 781 6000 An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2020. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Referral Ph.Eur. monograph: Filipendulae ulmariae herba 04/2013:1868 Currently: request for revision: replacement of hexane in TLC identification. Other Consistency (e.g. scientific decisions taken by HMPC) Public statements or other decisions taken by HMPC Consistency with other monographs within the therapeutic area Other Availability of new information (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • OSU Gardening with Oregon Native Plants
    GARDENING WITH OREGON NATIVE PLANTS WEST OF THE CASCADES EC 1577 • Reprinted March 2008 CONTENTS Benefi ts of growing native plants .......................................................................................................................1 Plant selection ....................................................................................................................................................2 Establishment and care ......................................................................................................................................3 Plant combinations ............................................................................................................................................5 Resources ............................................................................................................................................................5 Recommended native plants for home gardens in western Oregon .................................................................8 Trees ...........................................................................................................................................................9 Shrubs ......................................................................................................................................................12 Groundcovers ...........................................................................................................................................19 Herbaceous perennials and ferns ............................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Meadowsweet 2015
    ONLINE SERIES MONOGRAPHS The Scientific Foundation for Herbal Medicinal Products Filipendulae ulmariae herba Meadowsweet 2015 www.escop.com The Scientific Foundation for Herbal Medicinal Products FILIPENDULAE ULMARIAE HERBA Black Cohosh 2015 ESCOP Monographs were first published in loose-leaf form progressively from 1996 to 1999 as Fascicules 1-6, each of 10 monographs © ESCOP 1996, 1997, 1999 Second Edition, completely revised and expanded © ESCOP 2003 Second Edition, Supplement 2009 © ESCOP 2009 ONLINE SERIES ISBN 978-1-901964-37-0 Filipendulae ulmariae herba - Meadowsweet © ESCOP 2015 Published by the European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy (ESCOP) Notaries House, Chapel Street, Exeter EX1 1EZ, United Kingdom www.escop.com All rights reserved Except for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review no part of this text may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the written permission of the publisher. Important Note: Medical knowledge is ever-changing. As new research and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment may be required. In their efforts to provide information on the efficacy and safety of herbal drugs and herbal preparations, presented as a substantial overview together with summaries of relevant data, the authors of the material herein have consulted comprehensive sources believed to be reliable. However, in view of the possibility of human error by the authors or publisher of the work herein, or changes in medical knowledge, neither the authors nor the publisher, nor any other party involved in the preparation of this work, warrants that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or complete, and they are not responsible for any errors or omissions or for results obtained by the use of such information.
    [Show full text]
  • What's in Bloom
    WHAT’S IN BLOOM April 7, 2014 5 4 6 2 7 1 9 8 3 12 10 11 1 Mertensia virginica 5 Viburnum x carlcephalum 9 Malus ‘Hopa’ Virginia Bluebells Fragrant Snowball Flowering Crabapple 2 Neviusia alabamensis 6 Prunus x serrulata ‘Shirotae’ 10 Helleborus x hybridus Alabama Snow Wreath Mt. Fuji Cherry Hellebore 3 Cercis canadensis 7 Stachyurus praecox 11 Fruit Orchard Redbud Stachyurus Apple cultivars 4 Camellia japonica 8 Rhododendron hyperythrum 12 Cercis chinensis Japanese Camellia Rhododendron Chinese Redbud WHAT’S IN BLOOM April 7, 2014 BLOMQUIST GARDEN OF NATIVE PLANTS Amelanchier arborea Common Serviceberry Sanguinaria canadensis Bloodroot Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood Stylophorum diphyllum Celandine Poppy Thalictrum thalictroides Rue Anemone Fothergilla major Fothergilla Trillium decipiens Chattahoochee River Trillium Hepatica nobilis Hepatica Trillium grandiflorum White Trillium Hexastylis virginica Wild Ginger Hexastylis minor Wild Ginger Trillium pusillum Dwarf Wakerobin Illicium floridanum Florida Anise Tree Trillium stamineum Blue Ridge Wakerobin Malus coronaria Sweet Crabapple Uvularia sessilifolia Sessileleaf Bellwort Mertensia virginica Virginia Bluebells Pachysandra procumbens Allegheny spurge Prunus americana American Plum DORIS DUKE CENTER GARDENS Camellia japonica Japanese Camellia Pulmonaria ‘Diana Clare’ Lungwort Cercis canadensis Redbud Prunus persica Flowering Peach Puschkinia scilloides Striped Squill Cercis chinensis Redbud Sanguinaria canadensis Bloodroot Clematis armandii Evergreen Clematis Spiraea prunifolia Bridalwreath
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Loosestrife May Impede Boat Travel
    Pickeral Weed: Fireweed: Why Should Purple Pontederia cordata Epilobium angustifolium Loosestrife Concern Flowers 2-lipped, spikes Fatter spikes of 4-petaled, 3”-4”; leaves heart shaped, stalked flowers; alternate, You? single; water, 1’ to 3’ toothed leaves; northern plant of drier areas; 2’ to 6’ False Dragonhead: Plant diversity in wetlands Physostegia virginiana ✤ Tubular flowers, dissimilar petals; declines dramatically and toothed leaves; 1’ to 5’ (Other large mint many rare and endangered family plants: Hedge Nettle, Giant Hyssop) plants found in our remaining Swamp Loosestrife: Smartweed: wetlands are threatened. Decodon verticillatus Polygonum sp. Flowers bunched at (many native well-separated leaf species) - Tiny Most wetland animals that Look-a-likes ✤ bases; leaves whorled flowers, skinny depend on native plants for in 3s or 4s; stems spikes 1” to 4”; food and shelter decline usually arching, 1’ to 8’ alternate leaves clasp stem at base; significantly. Some species, stems jointed, 1’ to 6’ such as Baltimore butterflies, marsh wrens, and least bitterns may disappear entirely. Lupine: Blue Vervain: Lupinus perennis Verbena hastata Pea-like flowers; alternate, PURPLE (+ other Verbena sp.) ✤ Recreational uses of wetlands palm-like leaves; dry, LOOSESTRIFE Flowers tiny, pencil thin for hunting, trapping, fishing, sandy places; 2’ to 4’ spikes; toothed, oval, stalked leaves; moist bird watching and nature study to dry places; 2’ to 6’ decrease. Thick growth of purple loosestrife may impede boat travel. Winged Loosestrife: Steeplebush: ✤ Wetlands may store and filter Lythrum alatum Spiraea tomentosa less water. Smaller, single flowers DO NOT CONFUSE THESE Tiny flowers, conical at well-separated leaf set of flower spikes; bases; upper leaves NATIVE SPECIES WITH alternate, oval ✤ Millions of dollars spent to single; southern PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE! leaves; woody stem preserve wetlands would be prairies, 2’ to 3’ 1’ to 4’ wasted.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant List CITY of OREGON CITY 320 Warner Milne Road , P.O
    Native Plant List CITY OF OREGON CITY 320 Warner Milne Road , P.O. Box 3040, Oregon City, OR 97045 Phone: (503) 657-0891, Fax: (503) 657-7892 Scientific Name Common Name Habitat Type Wetland Riparian Forest Oak F. Slope Thicket Grass Rocky Wood TREES AND ARBORESCENT SHRUBS Abies grandis Grand Fir X X X X Acer circinatumAS Vine Maple X X X Acer macrophyllum Big-Leaf Maple X X Alnus rubra Red Alder X X X Alnus sinuata Sitka Alder X Arbutus menziesii Madrone X Cornus nuttallii Western Flowering XX Dogwood Cornus sericia ssp. sericea Crataegus douglasii var. Black Hawthorn (wetland XX douglasii form) Crataegus suksdorfii Black Hawthorn (upland XXX XX form) Fraxinus latifolia Oregon Ash X X Holodiscus discolor Oceanspray Malus fuscaAS Western Crabapple X X X Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa Pine X X Populus balsamifera ssp. Black Cottonwood X X Trichocarpa Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen X X Prunus emarginata Bitter Cherry X X X Prunus virginianaAS Common Chokecherry X X X Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir X X Pyrus (see Malus) Quercus garryana Garry Oak X X X Quercus garryana Oregon White Oak Rhamnus purshiana Cascara X X X Salix fluviatilisAS Columbia River Willow X X Salix geyeriana Geyer Willow X Salix hookerianaAS Piper's Willow X X Salix lucida ssp. lasiandra Pacific Willow X X Salix rigida var. macrogemma Rigid Willow X X Salix scouleriana Scouler Willow X X X Salix sessilifoliaAS Soft-Leafed Willow X X Salix sitchensisAS Sitka Willow X X Salix spp.* Willows Sambucus spp.* Elderberries Spiraea douglasii Douglas's Spiraea Taxus brevifolia Pacific Yew X X X Thuja plicata Western Red Cedar X X X X Tsuga heterophylla Western Hemlock X X X Scientific Name Common Name Habitat Type Wetland Riparian Forest Oak F.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Medical History Museum Guide to the Medicinal Plant Garden
    Indiana Medical History Museum Guide to the Medicinal Plant Garden Garden created and maintained by Purdue Master Gardeners of Marion County IMHM Medicinal Plant Garden Plant List – Common Names Trees and Shrubs: Arborvitae, Thuja occidentalis Culver’s root, Veronicastrum virginicum Black haw, Viburnum prunifolium Day lily, Hemerocallis species Catalpa, Catalpa bignonioides Dill, Anethum graveolens Chaste tree, Vitex agnus-castus Elderberry, Sambucus nigra Dogwood, Cornus florida Elecampane, Inula helenium Elderberry, Sambucus nigra European meadowsweet, Queen of the meadow, Ginkgo, Ginkgo biloba Filipendula ulmaria Hawthorn, Crateagus oxycantha Evening primrose, Oenothera biennis Juniper, Juniperus communis False Solomon’s seal, Smilacina racemosa Redbud, Cercis canadensis Fennel, Foeniculum vulgare Sassafras, Sassafras albidum Feverfew, Tanacetum parthenium Spicebush, Lindera benzoin Flax, Linum usitatissimum Witch hazel, Hamamelis virginiana Foxglove, Digitalis species Garlic, Allium sativum Climbing Vines: Golden ragwort, Senecio aureus Grape, Vitis vinifera Goldenrod, Solidago species Hops, Humulus lupulus Horehound, Marrubium vulgare Passion flower, Maypop, Passiflora incarnata Hyssop, Hyssopus officinalis Wild yam, Dioscorea villosa Joe Pye weed, Eupatorium purpureum Ladybells, Adenophora species Herbaceous Plants: Lady’s mantle, Alchemilla vulgaris Alfalfa, Medicago sativa Lavender, Lavendula angustifolia Aloe vera, Aloe barbadensis Lemon balm, Melissa officinalis American skullcap, Scutellaria laterifolia Licorice, Glycyrrhiza
    [Show full text]
  • Native Pollinator Plants by Season of Bloom
    Native Pollinator Plants by Season of Bloom Extended list of forage and host plants for bees, butterflies and moths Very early spring SHRUBS PERENNIALS American hazelnut, Corylus americana, Bloodroot, Sanguinaria Canadensis C. cornuta Sand/moss phlox, Phlox bifida & P. subulata American honeysuckle, Lonicera canadensis Pussy willow, Salix discolor Shadbush, Amerlanchier canadensis, A. laevis Bloodroot, © Lisa Looke Early spring SHRUBS PERENNIALS Bayberry, Morella caroliniensis Blue cohosh, Caulophyllum thalictroides Flowering big-bracted dogwood, Benthamidia Dutchman’s breeches, Dicentra cucullaria florida Crested Iris, Iris cristata* Hobblebush, Viburnum lanatanoides Golden groundsel, Packera aurea Red eldeberry, Sambucus pubens Spicebush, Lindera benzoin Marsh marigold, Caltha palustrus Sweet fern, Comptonia peregrina Pussytoes, Antennaria spp. Sweetgale, Myrica gale Rue anemone, Thalictrum thalictroides Wild plums Violets, Viola adunca, V. cuccularia Beach plum, Prunus maritima Virginia bluebells, Mertensia virginica* Canada plum, Prunus nigra Marsh marigold, © Lisa Looke Sand plum, Prunus pumila Mid-spring SHRUBS PERENNIALS (continued) Bearberry, Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Canada wild ginger, Asarum canadense Black huckleberry, Gaylussacia baccata Common golden Alexanders, Zizia aurea Blueberry, Vaccinium spp. Early meadow-rue, Thalictrum dioicum Eastern shooting star, Dodecatheon meadia* Chokeberry, Aronia arbutifolia & Aronia Foam flower, Tiarella cordifolia melanocarpa Heart-leaved golden Alexanders, Zizia aptera Common snowberry, Symphoricarpos albus Jacob’s ladder, Polemonium reptans* Fragrant sumac, Rhus aromatica* King Solomon’s-seal, Polygonatum biflorum Mountain maple, Acer spicatum var. commutaturn Nannyberry, Viburnum lentago Large-leaved pussytoes, Antennaria Red buckeye, Aesculus pavia* plantaginifolia Nodding onion, Alium cernuum* Spotted crane’s-bill, © Lisa Looke Redbud, Cersis canadensis* Striped maple, Acer pennsylvanicum Red baneberry, Actaea rubra Red columbine, Aquilegia canadensis Solomon’s plume, Maianthemum racemosum PERENNIALS (syn.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Chinese Spiraea (Rosaceae, Spiraeoideae) with Simple Inflorescences
    Review of Chinese Spiraea (Rosaceae, Spiraeoideae) with Simple Inflorescences Roman Businsky´ Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening (RILOG), 252 43 Pru˚honice, Czech Republic. [email protected] ABSTRACT. Several morphotypes of simple inflores- with simple inflorescences from Yunnan and Taiwan cences occurring in the genus Spiraea L. (Rosaceae), that had been hitherto confused are newly distin- widely used for classification and determination, but guished here. One species from each pair is found not uniformly interpreted in the literature, are either as a new species or as one neglected for the correctly defined. Taxonomically, S. compsophylla Chinese flora. Inflorescence type has traditionally Hand.-Mazz. is synonymized with the imperfectly been the most important character used to classify the known S. calcicola W. W. Sm., whose amplified genus Spiraea, but a certain confusion in its description and illustration are added. A newly interpretation exists. Two principal inflorescence distinguished species, hitherto confused with the types are found in this genus, distinguished as those former name, is described from Yunnan Province in with 1-flowered pedicels (simple inflorescences) or China and illustrated as S. adiantoides Businsky´, those with branched pedicels (compound inflores- with its assignment to section Glomeratae Nakai. Two cences). Both types are of indeterminate (racemose) imperfectly known and confused species of Spiraea character, i.e., the lower flowers (for compound sect. Chamaedryon Ser. from Taiwan, S. tarokoensis inflorescences, those of each segment) open first. Hayata and S. tatakaensis I. S. Chen, are carefully Although these two inflorescence types discriminated described, illustrated, and compared with six similar infrageneric division within the genus (for the history Chinese species.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Name Scientific Name Type Plant Family Native
    Common name Scientific name Type Plant family Native region Location: Africa Rainforest Dragon Root Smilacina racemosa Herbaceous Liliaceae Oregon Native Fairy Wings Epimedium sp. Herbaceous Berberidaceae Garden Origin Golden Hakone Grass Hakonechloa macra 'Aureola' Herbaceous Poaceae Japan Heartleaf Bergenia Bergenia cordifolia Herbaceous Saxifragaceae N. Central Asia Inside Out Flower Vancouveria hexandra Herbaceous Berberidaceae Oregon Native Japanese Butterbur Petasites japonicus Herbaceous Asteraceae Japan Japanese Pachysandra Pachysandra terminalis Herbaceous Buxaceae Japan Lenten Rose Helleborus orientalis Herbaceous Ranunculaceae Greece, Asia Minor Sweet Woodruff Galium odoratum Herbaceous Rubiaceae Europe, N. Africa, W. Asia Sword Fern Polystichum munitum Herbaceous Dryopteridaceae Oregon Native David's Viburnum Viburnum davidii Shrub Caprifoliaceae Western China Evergreen Huckleberry Vaccinium ovatum Shrub Ericaceae Oregon Native Fragrant Honeysuckle Lonicera fragrantissima Shrub Caprifoliaceae Eastern China Glossy Abelia Abelia x grandiflora Shrub Caprifoliaceae Garden Origin Heavenly Bamboo Nandina domestica Shrub Berberidaceae Eastern Asia Himalayan Honeysuckle Leycesteria formosa Shrub Caprifoliaceae Himalaya, S.W. China Japanese Aralia Fatsia japonica Shrub Araliaceae Japan, Taiwan Japanese Aucuba Aucuba japonica Shrub Cornaceae Japan Kiwi Vine Actinidia chinensis Shrub Actinidiaceae China Laurustinus Viburnum tinus Shrub Caprifoliaceae Mediterranean Mexican Orange Choisya ternata Shrub Rutaceae Mexico Palmate Bamboo Sasa
    [Show full text]
  • We Hope You Find This Field Guide a Useful Tool in Identifying Native Shrubs in Southwestern Oregon
    We hope you find this field guide a useful tool in identifying native shrubs in southwestern Oregon. 2 This guide was conceived by the “Shrub Club:” Jan Walker, Jack Walker, Kathie Miller, Howard Wagner and Don Billings, Josephine County Small Woodlands Association, Max Bennett, OSU Extension Service, and Brad Carlson, Middle Rogue Watershed Council. Photos: Text: Jan Walker Max Bennett Max Bennett Jan Walker Financial support for this guide was contributed by: • Josephine County Small • Silver Springs Nursery Woodlands Association • Illinois Valley Soil & Water • Middle Rogue Watershed Council Conservation District • Althouse Nursery • OSU Extension Service • Plant Oregon • Forest Farm Nursery Acknowledgements Helpful technical reviews were provided by Chris Pearce and Molly Sullivan, The Nature Conservancy; Bev Moore, Middle Rogue Watershed Council; Kristi Mergenthaler and Rachel Showalter, Bureau of Land Management. The format of the guide was inspired by the OSU Extension Service publication Trees to Know in Oregon by E.C. Jensen and C.R. Ross. Illustrations of plant parts on pages 6-7 are from Trees to Know in Oregon (used by permission). All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Book formatted & designed by: Flying Toad Graphics, Grants Pass, Oregon, 2007 3 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 4 Plant parts ................................................................................... 6 How to use the dichotomous keys ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum Salicaria L.) in a Southeastern Sedge Meadow John L
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Field Station Bulletins UWM Field Station Spring 1989 Purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) in a southeastern sedge meadow John L. Larson University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/fieldstation_bulletins Part of the Forest Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Larson, J.L. 1989. Purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) in a southeastern sedge meadow. Field Station Bulletin 22(1): 1-11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Field Station Bulletins by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE (Lythrum salicaria L.) IN A SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN SEDGE MEDOW John L. Larson Department of Biological Sciences University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201 ABSTRACT Floristic and seed bank composition of a sedge meadow containing purple loosestrife was examined in 1987 and 1988. Eleocharis spp., Spiraea tomentosa. Triadenum vircrinicum, and Lycopus spp. were widespread while infrequent or absent in nearby sedge meadows without purple loosestrife, suggesting that these species have similar microsite requirements. Changes noted in some species over time probably resulted from changes in climatic and soil moisture conditions. The seed bank reflected the dominant herbaceous vegetation but lacked a few species having moderate frequencies in the established vegetation. Limited samples, unsuitable germination conditions in the greenhouse, autumn seed germination by some species and inability to survive prolonged inundation may explain the paucity of seed of some species that were frequent in the vegetation.
    [Show full text]