DOCSLIB.ORG

Panel Recommendations Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Panel Recommendations Report MANGAWHAI PROGRAMME Community Advisory Panel JULY 2017 Input to Development of the Mangawhai Community Plan 1 MANGAWHAI PROGRAMME EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 VISION STATEMENT 4 SUSTAINABILITY 5 - 6 COASTAL VILLAGE LIFESTYLE 7 - 8 CONNECTIVITY 9 - 14 GROWTH 15 - 18 WATER 19 - 21 HERITAGE 22 OPEN SPACE 23 - 24 PANEL RECOMMENDATIONS 25 - 28 GREATER MANGAWHAI MAP 29 MASTERPLAN 30 APPENDICES 31 - 36 2 Figure 1: Geographic Area of the MCP EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The development of a Mangawhai Community Plan provides the opportunity to foster a vibrant and active coastal village lifestyle founded on sustainability, connectivity and good design. This report paints a picture of how Mangawhai will be a place where people ‘grow well’. It shows how a well-connected community is a cohesive community. It shows how sustainability will ensure growth does not impact adversely on the environment. Good design will enable effective use of space and improve the look and feel of the built environment. Council has the opportunity to facilitate and help drive appropriate new urban design development with fit for purpose and fit for future solutions. This will require a different way of thinking that challenges solving the same problems with the same ideas, including new ways of funding. The Community Advisory Panel has aimed to lift the bar on community expectations and to look at growth through the lens of the community at large as well as of the individual. We urge the Council to take the principles of cohesiveness, connectivity, sustainability, safety and good design and use them to guide the development of the Mangawhai Community Plan. Community Advisory Panel, July 2017 3 VISION STATEMENT Our vision is that Mangawhai will be the leading New Zealand coastal village where people can grow well. To achieve this vision Mangawhai will need to become a more connected community, one which is sustainable and has a well thought out future plan. This needs to build on a strong foundation and provide direction for the future whilst acknowledging and building on the present. OBJECTIVES · Protect and enhance public access and the public realm, including enjoyment of the harbour and beaches; · Manage and plan growth to retain the special character of Mangawhai; · Promote affordable and sustainable infrastructure that protects and retains a sense of openness and informality - ‘beach atmosphere’ This document aims to apply an urban design approach to the Mangawhai Community Plan (MCP) discussion. An urban design approach will ensure a cohesive integration of the community objectives. 4 SUSTAINABILITY Sustainability can be defined as WHAT IS SUSTAINABLE meeting the needs of the present URBAN DESIGN? without impacting the ability for future generations to meet their needs. Sustainability will be an underpinning principle to Mangawhai growth. From water harvesting, low impact design stormwater management, recycling of greywater and wastewater to planting of trees and shrubs and supporting biodiversity, sustainability will inform the development of Mangawhai as it grows. Mangawhai will meet the needs of the present without impacting on the ability of future generations to meet their needs. The future led thinking for this approach is a biosphere reserve. Every biosphere reserve shares 3 objectives: WHAT IS A BIOSPHERE RESERVE? · CONSERVATION - In terms of genetic resources, species and ecosystems · SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - Economic, environmental and human and cultural · LEARNING - Research, monitoring, environmental education and training. RE HE SP IO B ATMOSPHERE LITHOSPHERE BIOSPHERE ATMOSPHERE HYDROSPHERE LITHOSPHERE HYDROSPHERE The challenge is for Mangawhai to be the leading example of a biosphere in New Zealand. 5 SUSTAINABILITYSUSTAINABILITY -- BIOSPHEREBIOSPHERE CLARIFICATIONCLARIFICATION TheThe United United Nations Nations Educational, Educational, Scientific, Scientific, CulturalCultural OrganisatioOrganisationn (UNESCO) (UNESCO) is is a a world world recognisedrecognised global global organisation. organisation. One One of of their their high high profile profile prograprogramsms is is called called Man Man and and the the THREETHREE ZONESZONES BiosphereBiosphere (MAB). (MAB). Established Established in in 1977, 1977, it it promotes promotes an an interdisci interdisciplinaryplinary approach approach to to research, research, 1. CORE AREA’s - Strictly Strictly protected protected for for conservation conservation of of trainingtraining and and communication communication in in ecosystem ecosystem conservation conservation and and ration rationalal use use of of natural natural resources. resources. 1. CORE AREA’s - landscapes,landscapes, species species and and ecosystems ecosystems ItIt recognises recognises those those places places in in the the world world that that are are actively actively addre addressingssing the the many many challenges challenges 2. BUFFER ZONE - AreasAreas connecting connecting or or surrounding surrounding core core areas areas resultingresulting from from human human development. development. The The aim aim is is to to help help us us all all determine determine what what it it means means to to live live in in 2. BUFFER ZONE - thatthat allow allow activities activities that that reinforce reinforce scientific, scientific, training training andand aa conscious. conscious. healthy healthy and and sustainable sustainable way. way. educationaleducational purposes. purposes. ThereThere are are more more than than 550 550 biospheres biospheres in in more more than than 100 100 countries. countries. 3.3. TRANSITION TRANSITION AREA AREA - - Where Where the the greatist greatist amount amount of of activity activity EveryEvery Biosphere Biosphere reserve reserve shares shares 3 3 objectives: objectives: isis allowed, allowed, fostering fostering economic economic and and human human development development that that i sis socio-culturallysocio-culturally and and economically economically sustainable. sustainable. -- CONSERVATION CONSERVATION - - In In terms terms of of genetic genetic resources, resources, species species and and ecosystems ecosystems SUSTAINABILITY -- SUSTAINABLE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT - - Economic, Economic, environmental environmental and and human human and and cultural cultural -- LEARNING LEARNING - - Research, Research, monitoring, monitoring, environmental environmental education education and and training training KEY AREAS IN MANGAWHAI KEYKEY AREASAREAS ININ MANGAWHAI:MANGAWHAI: I HEADS A ES H N W U A D G D N N WHATWHAT ISIS AA BIOSPHEREBIOSPHERE RESERVE?RESERVE? A A M S -- Biosphere Biosphere reserves reserves are are sites sites that that demonstrate demonstrate innovative innovative approaches approaches to to conservation. conservation. TheyThey share share their their experience experience and and ideas ideas regionally, regionally, nationally nationally and and internationally internationally within within a a global global networknetwork of of biosphere biosphere reserves. reserves. -- Biosphere Biosphere reserves reserves go go beyond beyond confined confined protectedprotected areasareas to to where where sustainable sustainable economic economic MANGAWHAIMANGAWHAI HEADS HEADS SAND SAND DUNES DUNES S developmentdevelopment is is made made possible possible through through partnerships partnerships with with local local pe people.ople. YN W Y R R E A D -- Biosphere Biosphere reserves reserves are are about about developing developing quality quality economies economies based based on on local local community community U N T Y R actionaction and and entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship, sound sound science, science, public-private public-private sect sectoror partnerships partnerships and and networking. networking. S B E -- Biosphere Biosphere reserves reserves also also provide provide living living laboratories laboratories to to experiment experiment with with and and showcase showcase variousvarious approaches approaches to to sustainable sustainable development development that that are are cultural culturallyly relevant relevant to to local local communities.communities. ESTUARY BRYNDERWYNS ISSUESISSUES + + RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS ESTUARY BRYNDERWYNS (M NE AZ) DS ZO UN O Y R IT G V I P T M C A A C PARK OOL AI CH H S W Y A R G A N M I A R M P 6 EADS CONCEPTUAL MAP I H A H W A G WELCOME TO MANGAWHAI SIGN N N EW A MAI N R M O UT E T O B EA CH E OUT R ASS P Y K B R A P I A CONNECTIVITY H WOOD ST W A G FERRY N MANGAWHAI PARK A M AL TR EN C I A H W A ‘CROSS OVER’ T G C NE N A ON LTERN A C A M TIVE ROUTE I NTO VILLAGE E G A L L OLD WHARF REBUILD I V I MANGAWHAI VILLAGE A H W A G N A M COASTAL VILLAGE LIFESTYLE DENSITY AND THE MANGAWHAI LIFESTYLE Changing lifestyles are influencing the way we live. Mangawhai has a mix of permanent and non-permanent population, with approximately half the population being non-residents. This leads to different expectations on housing style and amenity leading to alternatives to past density models. Accommodating a mix of densities is part of supporting a rich and diverse community. Good design must underpin development, irrespective of density. Council can assist this through good design guidelines. Feedback from the community is that poor urban design in some recent subdivisions has contributed to a loss of character and amenity in Mangawhai. Examples referred to include poor pedestrian connections, inappropriate fencing, poor location of building platforms, garages, above-ground water tanks, large areas of concrete and removal of vegetation. In many
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mangawhai Spatial Plan
    urbanism + MANGAWHAI SPATIAL PLAN Public Presentation Kaipara District Council Campbell Brown Planning Urbanismplus Commute 9 December 2019 Introduction urbanism + This document contains the slides presented at Mangawhai Domain on 9 December 2019. The presentation was introduced by Paul Waanders of Kaipara District Council and delivered by Kobus Mentz of Urbanismplus and Michael Campbell of Campbell Brown Planning. A small insertion regarding the Mangawhai market has been made on P41. 2 Planning Context urbanism + DISTRICT PLAN: OPERATIVE Statutory 2013 DRAFT TOWN PLAN REPORT Non-statutory 2016/2017 MANGAWHAI COMMUNITY Non-statutory but community led PLAN 2017 MANGAWHAI SPATIAL PLAN Non-statutory 2019/2020 DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW & Statutory documents informed by LTP PLANNING the Spatial Plan 3 Where are we now urbanism + COMMUNTY CONSULTATION TECHNICAL STAFF & COUNCILLORS WORK COUNCILLORS PRESENTATIONPRESENTATION December August October Nov/December December COMMUNITY REPORT COMMUNITY FINAL REPORT FEEDBACK FEEDBACK ADOPTION Dec/January Jan/February March/April April 4 The Existing Situation urbanism + Regional Context • More a rural coastal town Whangarei than a rural service centre. • High population growth Marsden Point over the past 5-10 years. • High proportion of holiday Waipu homes but increasing permanent residents. Maungaturoto • SH 1 extension will Mangawhai Kaiwaka increase accessibility to Auckland. Wellsford 5 The Existing Situation urbanism + Local Context ENVIRONMENT & THREE WATERS COMMUNITY, CULTURE & JOBS • Limited ecological information • Low visibility/awareness of Māori • Mainly on rain tank water. and settlers history and culture. • Limited info on stormwater • Limited fit-for-purpose community catchments. facilities. • Wastewater system for additional • Lack of Business zoned land. 1,000 properties • Rules for Commercial activities in • Limits to the network.
    [Show full text]
  • Ban Single Use Plastic Bags Petition.Pdf
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Recipient: Kaipara District Council, Mayor and Councillors of Kaipara District Council Letter: Greetings, Ban Single-use Plastic Bags in Kaipara 39 Signatures Name Location Date Margaret Baker New Zealand 2017-07-01 Mike Hooton Paparoa, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Lyn Little northland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Wendy Charles Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Stuart W J Brown Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Lisa Cotterill Dargaville, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Elsie-May Dowling Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Nick Rountree Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 dido dunlop auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Wayne David Millar Paparoa , Kaipara , Northland, New 2017-07-01 Zealand Eve-Marie Allen Northland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Grant George Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Lisa Talbot Kaiwaka, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Jana Campbell Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Sarah Clements Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Gail Aiken Rawene, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Elizabeth Clark Maungaturoto, Alabama, US 2017-07-01 Helen Curreen Mangawhai, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Asta Wistrand Kaitaia, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Rosanna Donovan dargaville, New Zealand 2017-07-01 40 Name Location Date Wes Watson Kaikohe, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Nat V East Brisbane, Australia 2017-07-01 Jordan Rakoia Kaipara, New Zealand 2017-07-01 CAREN Davis Mangawhai Heads, New Zealand 2017-07-02 Michelle Casey Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-02 Anna Kingi Mangawhai, New Zealand 2017-07-02 Misty Lang Auckland,
    [Show full text]
  • Population Projections 2018-2051 Kaipara District Council
    Population Projections 2018-2051 Kaipara District Council October 2020 Authorship This report has been prepared by Nick Brunsdon Email: [email protected] All work and services rendered are at the request of, and for the purposes of the client only. Neither Infometrics nor any of its employees accepts any responsibility on any grounds whatsoever, including negligence, to any other person or organisation. While every effort is made by Infometrics to ensure that the information, opinions, and forecasts are accurate and reliable, Infometrics shall not be liable for any adverse consequences of the client’s decisions made in reliance of any report provided by Infometrics, nor shall Infometrics be held to have given or implied any warranty as to whether any report provided by Infometrics will assist in the performance of the client’s functions. 3 Kaipara Population Projections – October 2020 Table of Contents Executive summary ........................................................................ 4 Introduction ......................................................................................5 Our Approach ..................................................................................6 Employment ................................................................................................................................. 6 Migration .......................................................................................................................................7 Existing Population ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Proposal Speed Limits Review – Mangawhai and Kaiwaka West Area
    www.Kaipara.gov t.nz 42 Hokianga Road Priv ate Bag 1001, Dargaville 0310 [email protected] Phone 0800 727 059 Statement of Proposal Speed Limits Review – Mangawhai and Kaiwaka West Area Introduction Kaipara District Council is proposing to amend our Speed Limits Bylaw 2018 as part of an ongoing programme to review speed limits on the district’s roads. Council is a Road Controlling Authority and is responsible for setting speed limits on all roads within the Kaipara District (except State Highways). The speed limit reviews are part of a nationwide programme under the Governments ‘Road to Zero’ Road Safety Strategy. This ‘Statement of Proposal’ (SOP) document is a legal requirement when Council is proposing to make, amend or revoke a Bylaw. The SOP is the document that is made available to you as part of the consultation process. It contains background information on the proposal to assist you in providing your thoughts to Council on the topic. This SOP includes some background information to help you understand how proposed changes to speed limits are arrived at, as well as a summary of the proposed speed limit changes within the Hakaru (Mangawhai- Kaiwaka) and the Kaiwaka West (Oneriri and Oruawharo) Speed Review Areas. In addition to the information in this SOP, Council has also provided more detailed technical information on the review process and the matters that we have considered when proposing new speed limits on our website at www.kaipara.govt.nz/haveyoursay. Background There is a need to reduce deaths and serious injuries on the road network; but also, ensure that people and goods can move around the road network efficiently.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Towns and Rural Centres 1976-2013
    NIDEA WORKING NIDEA PAPERS National Institute of Demographic No 7 Nov 2016 and Economic Analysis New Zealand’s towns and rural centres 1976-2013 – experimental components of growth Natalie Jackson, Lars Brabyn and Dave Maré NIDEA Working Papers are intended as a forum for the publication of selected papers on research produced within the Institute, for discussion and comment among the research community and policy analysts prior to more formal refereeing and publication. The National Institute of Demographic and Economic Analysis (NIDEA) links together a virtual and evolving community of national and international researchers whose research focus is the interaction of demographic, social and economic processes. Initially founded through collaboration between the University of Waikato’s Population Studies Centre, Waikato Management School, and Wellington- based Motu Economic and Public Policy Research Trust, the Institute’s primary goal is to help inform choices and responses to the demographic, social and economic interactions that are shaping New Zealand’s future. Reflecting this objective, NIDEA’s research programme comprises five interconnected themes, and is supported and sustained by a strong capacity-building programme. Te Rūnanga Tātari Tatauranga | National Institute of Demographic and Economic Analysis Te Whare Wānanga o Waikato | The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 | Hamilton 3240 | Waikato, New Zealand Email: [email protected] | visit us at: www.waikato.ac.nz/nidea/ ISSN 2230-441X (Print) ISSN 2230-4428 (Online) 2 | Page New Zealand’s towns and rural centres 1976-2013 – experimental components of growth1,2 Natalie Jackson, Lars Brabyn and Dave Maré Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect any official position on the part of NIDEA or the University of Waikato.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights from Census 2013: Northland Data
    HIGHLIGHTS FROM CENSUS 2013: NORTHLAND DATA Dr Clair Mills, Medical Officer of Health Northland District Health Board February 2014 0 HIGHLIGHTS FROM NORTHLAND 2013 CENSUS DATA This report provides a provisional analysis of Census 2013 data for Northland region. Please note the methods used, as described in the endnote. Feedback on any errors or on interpretation of the data is welcome – please email to: [email protected] POPULATION CHANGES IN NORTHLAND (see population pyramid graphs and map annexed) 151,692 people were “usually resident” in Northland at the time of the Census 2013. This is a 3% increase overall in Northland since 2006 (a 0.43% average increase per annum), lower than the national average growth of 5.3% (0.7% p.a.) in the same period. However Kaipara District Council’s population has actually fallen by 0.2% since 2006, a loss of 111 people in real terms. Marked falls in population are also apparent in other areas, with declines to 2001 levels or below, including: Central Whangarei, Tikipunga, Otangarei and Raumanga in WDC Dargaville, Maungaturoto and coastal Kaipara in KDC North Hokianga, Kaitaia, Far North, Russell, Kawakawa, Moerewa and Kaikohe. Conversely there have been population increases in areas such as Three Mile Bush and Ruakaka in WDC, Mangawhai/Mangawhai Heads in KDC, and Kerikeri, Kapiro and parts of Taipa and Karikari in FNDC. 29.6% of the Northland population identifies as Māori – similar to the 29.3% in 2006. 52.2% of those claiming Māori descent in Northland affiliate to Ngapuhi. 3048 more people claim Māori ancestry than identify as Māori.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Speed Limit Reviews Mangawhai – Kaiwaka Catchment
    Regional Speed Limit Reviews Mangawhai – Kaiwaka Catchment Error! Reference source not found. Table of Contents 1 Overview 4 1.1 Road Speed Environments 4 1.2 Variable School Speed Zones 5 2 Review Area 6 2.1 Cross Boundary Issues 6 3 Summary of Proposed Amendments 9 3.1 Mangawhai Urban Traffic Area 9 3.2 Proposed Kaiwaka Urban Traffic Area 10 3.3 Hakaru (Kaiwaka-Mangawhai) Catchment Review Area 15 3.4 Kaiwaka West 17 3.5 School Speed Zones 21 3.5.1 Mangawhai Beach School and Mangawhai Kindergarten 21 3.5.2 Before 6 Early Childhood Centre – Molesworth Drive, Mangawhai 22 3.5.3 Kaiwaka School – Kaiwaka-Mangawhai Road, Kaiwaka 23 3.5.4 Small Pukeko’s Early Learning Centre - Kaiwaka-Mangawhai Road, Kaiwaka 24 3.5.5 Te Kura Kaupapa Maori O Ngaringaomatariki – Oruawharo School Road 25 4 Reasons for Change 26 4.1 Kaiwaka-Mangawhai Road 27 4.2 Tara Road 27 4.3 Cames Road 27 4.4 Mangawhai Heads Surf Beach Area 27 4.5 Mangawhai Heads Business Area 27 4.6 Molesworth Drive 28 4.7 Mangawhai Township 28 4.8 Kaiwaka Urban Traffic Area 28 4.9 Mangawhai Urban Area 28 5 Setting of Speed Limits Rule considerations 28 5.1 NZTA Information 28 5.2 Speed Management Guidance 29 5.3 Function and Use of the Road 29 5.3.1 Function and use of road – Hakaru Catchment (Kaiwaka-Mangawhai) 30 5.3.2 Function and use of road – Kaiwaka West Catchment 32 5.4 Crash Risk 33 5.4.1 Crash Risk - Hakaru Catchment (Kaiwaka-Mangawhai) 33 5.4.2 Crash Risk – Kaiwaka West Catchment 38 KETE DOC ID 2 Error! Reference source not found.
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Mangawhai Historic Wharf Trust
    Mangawhai Historic Wharf Trust Resource Consent Application Appendix 4 CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT APPLICATION FOR RESOURCE CONSENT MANGAWHAI HARBOUR RESTORATION SOCIETY HISTORIC MANGAWHAI WHARF REBUILD END OF MOIR POINT ROAD, MANGAWHAI APRIL 2018 Environs Holdings Limited Tai Tokerau Maori Trust Board Building Level 2 3-5 Hunt Street Whangarei Phone (09) 459 7001 Ext 5 Email [email protected] Website: www.uriohau.com Whakataukī Tupu te Toi Whanake te Toi He Toi ora He Toi he Toi i ahu mai i Hawaiki To tau muri ki te Atua No te mea Ko taku taha tera Knowledge that grows Knowledge that expands Knowledge that survives Knowledge that comes from Hawaiki Knowledge that comes from patience and tolerance Knowledge that comes from God for that is wisdom Whakapapa Ko te tūpuna taketake o Te Uri o Hau, Ko Haumoewaarangi. Ka moe a Haumoewaarangi i a Waihekeao, Ka puta ki waho ko a raua tamariki tokowhitu: ko Makawe, ko Mauku, ko Whiti, ko Weka, ko ruinga, ko rongo me Hakiputaomuri. Ka puta i a Hakiputatomuri ko nga uri matinitini e mohiotia nei i tenei wa, Ko Te Uri o Hau. According to the traditions of Te Uri o Hau, the eponymous ancestor of Te Uri o Hau is Haumoewaarangi. From the marriage of Haumoewaarangi with Waihekeao came seven offspring: Makawe, Mauku, Whiti, Weka, Ruinga, Rongo and Hakiputatomuri. From Hakiputatomuri came many descendants known to this day as Te Uri o Hau. 2 © Environs Holdings Limited 2018 This Cultural Impact Assessment (“CIA”) has been prepared for the Mangawhai Harbour Restoration Society in relation to the rebuild of the historic Mangawhai Wharf situated at the end of Moir Point Road, Mangawhai.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Effects Assessment
    CULTURAL EFFECTS ASSESSMENT RURAL CONNECTIVITY GROUP (RCG) PROPOSAL TO BUILD A NEW TELECOMMUNTCATIONS (MOBILE/BROADBAND) FACILITY AT PT ALLOTMENT 141 PSH OF TE KOPURU 22150 GLINKS GULLY, DARGAVILLE, NORTHLAND OCTOBER 2019 Environs Holdings Limited Tai Tokerau Maori Trust Board Building Level 2 3-5 Hunt Street Whangarei Phone F/P 0800 438 894, P: 09 459 7001 Email [email protected] Website: www.uriohau.com Whakataukī Tupu te Toi Whanake te Toi He Toi ora He Toi he Toi i ahu mai i Hawaiki To tau muri ki te Atua No te mea Ko taku taha tera Knowledge that grows Knowledge that expands Knowledge that survives Knowledge that comes from Hawaiki Knowledge that comes from patience and tolerance Knowledge that comes from God for that is wisdom Whakapapa Ko te tūpuna taketake o Te Uri o Hau, Ko Haumoewaarangi. Ka moe a Haumoewaarangi i a Waihekeao, Ka puta ki waho ko a raua tamariki tokowhitu: ko Makawe, ko Mauku, ko Whiti, ko Weka, ko ruinga, ko rongo me Hakiputaomuri. Ka puta i a Hakiputatomuri ko nga uri matinitini e mohiotia nei i tenei wa, Ko Te Uri o Hau. According to the traditions of Te Uri o Hau, the eponymous ancestor of Te Uri o Hau is Haumoewaarangi. From the marriage of Haumoewaarangi with Waihekeao came seven offspring: Makawe, Mauku, Whiti, Weka, Ruinga, Rongo and Hakiputatomuri. From Hakiputatomuri came many descendants known to this day as Te Uri o Hau. 2 Prepared by: Approved by: Shereen Worthington Stephen Brown Cultural Resources Consultant Environs Holdings Manager Te Uri o Hau – Otamatea © Environs Holdings Limited 2019 This Cultural Effects Assessment (“CEA”) has been prepared for RURAL CONNECTIVITY GROUP who seek proposal to build a new telecommunication (mobile/broadband) facilities on Part Allotment 141 Psh of Te Kopuru, 22150 Glinks Gully, Dargaville.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas of Rodney Ecological District (Northland Conservancy): Reconnaissance Survey Report for the Protected Natural Area
    Natural areas of Rodney Ecological District (Northland Conservancy) Reconnaissance survey report for the Protected Natural Areas Programme 2012 Natural areas of Rodney Ecological District (Northland Conservancy) Reconnaissance survey report for the Protected Natural Areas Programme Nick Goldwater, Pete Graham, Wendy Holland, Sarah Beadel, Tim Martin and Shona Myers 2012 Department of Conservation Northland Conservancy PO Box 842 149–151 Banks Street Whanagarei 0140 New Zealand Cover: Poa billardierei on Mangawhai Sandspit. Photo Courstesy of Wildland Consultants Limited (photographer Nick Goldwater). © Copyright December 2012, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 0112-9252 (New Zealand Protected Natural Areas Programme Series) Print ISBN 978–0–478–14970–8 Web ISBN 978–0–478–14971–5 In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. CONTENTS Foreword 5 Abstract 7 1. Introduction 11 1.1 The Protected Natural Areas Programme 11 1.2 Ecological regions and districts 12 1.3 Contents of this report 13 2. Methods 14 2.1 General approach 14 2.2 Consultation with landowners 15 2.3 Data acquisition and analysis 15 2.4 Nationally Threatened, At Risk, and regionally significant species classifications 16 2.5 Criteria for assessing ecological significance 17 2.6 Change over time 18 2.7 Land Environments of New Zealand 19 3. Ecological character 20 3.1 Location and setting 20 3.2 Topography/geology 21 3.3 Climate 22 3.4 Vegetation and flora 22 3.5 Fauna 35 3.6 Threats 46 3.7 Restoration work undertaken by the community 51 4. Site descriptions 52 4.1 Level 1 sites 52 4.2 Level 2 sites 132 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Waipu's Teenage Thrash Metal Celebrities Cycle/Walkway From
    Affordable Quality * SECURITY DOORS * INSECT SCREENS * SHOWER DOORS * BLINDS * AWNINGS * WARDROBE SYSTEMS Regular Bream Bay Service 1967 Phone 432 0209. email [email protected] PH: 438 9452 Mobile 027432 0070 Postal address - RD 2, Waipu 0582 6 December 2018 34 Albert St Whangarei Website: www.breambaynews.co.nz LOCALLY OWNED AND OPERATED Div. Shadelite Industry Cycle/walkway from Waipu’s teenage thrash metal celebrities Mangawhai to OTP in NZTA business study A cycle and walking track from Mangawhai to One Tree Point is being considered under a $6.5 million Provin- cial Growth Fund grant to the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA). The grant is to undertake a Business Case Development Project based on the Twin Coast Discovery Route through Northland. The Whangarei District Council’s Long Term Plan con- tains the statement that the Council had applied to the Provincial Growth Fund to construct shared paths (for cyclists and walkers) connecting Paihia to Whangarei and One Tree Point to Mangawhai as part of a Regional Walking and Cycling Strategy. Asked how this application was progressing, Jeff Devine, The WDC’s Roading Manager said, “The project to build walking and cycling paths across rural Northland is one of the seven business cases being de- veloped within the NZTA project. He said one of the requirements of a PGF project is that it must be shown in the Regional Land Transport Plan, (RLTP) and the needed amendment to the RLTP From left: Niel (Hammerhead) de Jong, Lewis and Henry de Jong and Ethan Trembath at home in Waipu. is being put at the next Regional Transport Committee The latest in a string of awards for the Waipu based Dick Frizzell, sits on a trophy shelf in band members meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaipara Harbour Coastal Environment Policy Review October 2007 TP345
    Kaipara Harbour Coastal Environment Policy Review October 2007 TP345 Auckland Regional Council Technical Publication No. 345, 2007 ISSN 1175-205X ISBN -13 : 978-1-877416-85-9 ISBN -10 : 1-877416-85-1 Kaipara Harbour Coastal Environment Policy Review Prepared by: A. Kirschberg, Beca Carter Hollings and Ferner Ltd for: Auckland Regional Council and Northland Regional Council Recommended Citation: Kirschberg, A. (2007). Kaipara Harbour Coastal Environment Policy Review. Auckland Regional Council Technical Publication Number 345. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Project Background 1 1.2 Purpose of the Study 1 1.3 Scope of the Analysis 2 1.4 Project Methodology 2 1.5 Report Structure 3 2 Overview - Kaipara Harbour Coastal Environment 4 2.1 Existing Environment 4 2.2 Natural Values 4 2.3 Activities and Uses 5 2.4 Key Issues facing the Kaipara Harbour Coastal Environment 5 2.4.1 Current Management of the Harbour 5 2.5 Environmental Issues 8 2.6 Environmental Monitoring 9 3 Statutory Framework – Coastal Management 10 3.1 Resource Management Act 10 3.2 New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 10 3.3 Regional Policy Statements 10 3.4 Regional Coastal Plans 11 3.5 Other Regional Plans 11 3.6 District Plans 12 3.7 Local Government Act 2002 12 3.7.1 LTCCPS 12 3.7.2 Annual Plans 13 3.8 Policy Documents affecting management of the KHCE 13 3.8.1 Statutory RMA Documents 13 3.8.2 Other Management Mechanisms 14 4 Policy Review - Regional Policy Documents 16 4.1 Operative Auckland Regional Policy Statement (1999) 16 4.1.1 ARPS Content and Scope 16 4.1.2 Description
    [Show full text]