Invasive Species Strategy 2020-2030
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a Resource for Taxonomy and Biodiversity Conservation in the Mediterranean Region
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 597:Barcoding 27–38 (2016) Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation... 27 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.597.7241 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region Giulia Magoga1,*, Davide Sassi2, Mauro Daccordi3, Carlo Leonardi4, Mostafa Mirzaei5, Renato Regalin6, Giuseppe Lozzia7, Matteo Montagna7,* 1 Via Ronche di Sopra 21, 31046 Oderzo, Italy 2 Centro di Entomologia Alpina–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 3 Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, 37129 Verona, Italy 4 Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italy 5 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources–University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran 6 Dipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione e l’Ambiente–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy Corresponding authors: Matteo Montagna ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Santiago-Blay | Received 20 November 2015 | Accepted 30 January 2016 | Published 9 June 2016 http://zoobank.org/4D7CCA18-26C4-47B0-9239-42C5F75E5F42 Citation: Magoga G, Sassi D, Daccordi M, Leonardi C, Mirzaei M, Regalin R, Lozzia G, Montagna M (2016) Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys 597: 27–38. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.597.7241 Abstract The Mediterranean Region is one of the world’s biodiversity hot-spots, which is also characterized by high level of endemism. -
Redalyc.Sinopsis De Los Géneros Mexicanos De Chrysomelinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Benítez-García, Benjamín; López-Pérez, Sara; Zaragoza-Caballero, Santiago Sinopsis de los géneros mexicanos de Chrysomelinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 88, núm. 2, junio-, 2017, pp. 335-348 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42551127007 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Disponible en www.sciencedirect.com Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 88 (2017) 335–348 www.ib.unam.mx/revista/ Taxonomía y sistemática Sinopsis de los géneros mexicanos de Chrysomelinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Synopsis of the Mexican genera of Chrysomelinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) ∗ Benjamín Benítez-García, Sara López-Pérez y Santiago Zaragoza-Caballero Colección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 Ciudad de México, México Recibido el 21 de septiembre de 2016; aceptado el 7 de diciembre de 2016 Disponible en Internet el 11 de mayo de 2017 Resumen Se presenta una descripción general de los 14 géneros de Chrysomelidae registrados para México y una clave dicotómica para el reconocimiento de los mismos. Se incluyen datos de distribución y se ilustran especies representativas de cada uno de los géneros. © 2017 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología. Este es un artículo Open Access bajo la licencia CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). -
Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication). -
Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and New Biological Data from Rio De Janeiro, Brazil1
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 720: 5–22Chrysomelinae (2017) species and new biological data from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil... 5 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.720.13963 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Chrysomelinae species (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and new biological data from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil1 Vivian Flinte1, André Abejanella1, Mauro Daccordi2, Ricardo F. Monteiro1, Margarete Valverde Macedo1 1 Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373. CCS, IB, Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Ilha do Fundão, CEP 21941-590, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil 2 Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, 37129, Verona, Italy Corresponding author: Vivian Flinte ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Chaboo | Received 3 July 2017 | Accepted 26 September 2017 | Published 11 December 2017 http://zoobank.org/F7F02CEC-2664-4584-A765-745A6E0CF72B Citation: Flinte V, Abejanella A, Daccordi M, Monteiro RF, Macedo MV (2017) Chrysomelinae species (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and new biological data from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In: Chaboo CS, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 7. ZooKeys 720: 5–22. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.720.13963 Abstract Chrysomelinae is one of the largest subfamilies in Chrysomelidae, yet much basic information remains un- known for Neotropical species. The present study aims to compile the first regional list of Chrysomelinae for the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and assemble natural history traits obtained from our fieldwork from 2005 to 2010 in Serra dos Órgãos National Park, a mountainous area of Atlantic forest. The species list was compiled from data from field work, collections, and literature, and recorded a total of 100 species, belonging to 21 gen- era in one tribe (Chrysomelini) and three subtribes: Chrysolinina (91 species), Chrysomelina (eight species) and Entomoscelina (one species). -
The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Plagiodera Versicolora (Laicharting)(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PART B 2020, VOL. 5, NO. 3, 3600–3601 https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2020.1829138 MITOGENOME ANNOUNCEMENT The complete mitochondrial genome of Plagiodera versicolora (Laicharting)(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Wei-Wei Xiea,b, Liang-Jing Shenga,b, Yi Wana,b, Xiao-Qian Wenga,b, Guang-Hong Lianga,b, Fei-Ping Zhanga,b and Hui Chena aCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China; bKey Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management in Ecological Forests, Fujian Province University, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Plagiodera versicolora (Laicharting) is a leaf-eating pest widely distributed in the world. In this study, Received 11 September 2020 the first complete mitochondrial genome of P. Versicolora (Laicharting) was assembled and analyzed. Accepted 18 September 2020 The complete mitochondrial genome of P. Versicolora (Laicharting) is 16,857 bp with 22.39% GC con- KEYWORDS taining, 13 protein-coding genes, 22 transfer RNA (tRNA), 2 ribosomal RNA (rRNA), as well as an AT-rich Complete mitochondrial region. Phylogenomic analysis indicated that P. Versicolora (Laicharting) is sister to Chrysomela genome; Plagiodera populiThis study provides useful information for the identification of this species and the study of gen- versicolora; phyloge- etic evolution with other species of Chrysomelidae. nomic analysis Plagiodern Versicolora (Laicharting) is classified as accession No: MT826862). Three characteristics of protein- Chrysomelida of Coleoptera, which is one of the major pests coding sequence, tRNA, and rRNA were obtained by of poplar and willow (Wade 1994).This insect is widely distrib- mitoMaker (Bernt et al. 2013). Also, tRNA genes were pre- uted in the world, including Asia, Europe and North America. -
Willow Hybridization Differentially Affects Preference and Performance Of
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 83: 285±294, 1997. 285 c 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in Belgium. Willow hybridization differentially affects preference and performance of herbivorous beetles ; Colin M. Orians1; , Cynthia H. Huang1, Alexander Wild1, Katherine A. Dorfman1 , Pamela Zee2,MinhTamT.Dao2 & Robert S. Fritz2 1Department of Biology, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603, USA; 2Department of Biology, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA; Present address: Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA; Mt Holyoke College, Department of Geology and Geography, South Hadley, MA 01075, USA Accepted: February 6, 1997 Key words: Salix, hybridization, phenolic glycosides, herbivore preference, herbivore performance Abstract We examined the preferences and performances of ®ve beetle species (four chrysomelids and one scarab) on two species of willows (Salix sericea and S. eriocephala) and their interspeci®c hybrids. Beetle species differed markedly in their responses. In preference assays, two chrysomelid beetle species (Calligrapha multipunctata bigsbyana and Plagiodera versicolora) preferred hybrids, two chrysomelids (Chrysomela scripta and Ch. Knabi) preferred hybrids and S. sericea, and the scarab beetle (Popillia japonica) preferred S. eriocephala. Experiments with puri®ed salicortin indicated that salicortin concentration may contribute to these preferences. The relative performance (growth rate, pupal/adult weight and survivorship) of these beetles on the three willow taxa did not correspond with their feeding preferences. Three species exhibited intermediate performance on hybrid willows (the two Chrysomela spp. and P.japonica); the Chrysomela spp. performed best on S. sericea, while P.japonica performed best on S. eriocephala. One species performed equally well on all three taxa (C. multipunctata bigsbyana). The performance of Pl. -
Literature Cited in Chrysomela from 1979 to 2003 Newsletters 1 Through 42
Literature on the Chrysomelidae From CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, numbers 1-42 October 1979 through June 2003 (2,852 citations) Terry N. Seeno, Past Editor The following citations appeared in the CHRYSOMELA process and rechecked for accuracy, the list undoubtedly newsletter beginning with the first issue published in 1979. contains errors. Revisions will be numbered sequentially. Because the literature on leaf beetles is so expansive, Adobe InDesign 2.0 was used to prepare and distill these citations focus mainly on biosystematic references. the list into a PDF file, which is searchable using standard They were taken directly from the publication, reprint, or search procedures. If you want to add to the literature in author’s notes and not copied from other bibliographies. this bibliography, please contact the newsletter editor. All Even though great care was taken during the data entering contributors will be acknowledged. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1968. Phyllobrotica decorata DuPortei, Cassidinae) em condições de laboratório. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 30(1): a new sub-species of the Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with 105-113, 7 figs., 2 tabs. a review of the species of Phyllobrotica in the Lyman Museum Collec- tion. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104(1244-1246):4-9, 32 figs. Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1982. Chromosomal findings on eight species of European Cryptocephalus. Experientia 38:774-775, 11 figs. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1969. Abnormal elytra, wings and other structures in a female Trirhabda virgata (Chrysomelidae) with a Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1984. Karyotypic Analyses in Four summary of similar teratological observations in the Coleoptera. Dtsch. Species of Hispinae (Col.: Chrysomelidae). -
Defining Ecosystem Flow Requirements for the Bill Williams River, Arizona
Defining Ecosystem Flow Requirements for the Bill Williams River, Arizona Edited by Patrick B. Shafroth and Vanessa B. Beauchamp Open-File Report 2006–1314 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Shafroth, P.B., and Beauchamp, V.B., 2006, Defining ecosystem flow requirements for the Bill Williams River, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2006-1314, 135 p. Also available online at: http://www.fort.usgs.gov/products/publications/21745/21745.pdf Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Cover photograph courtesy of Patrick Shafroth, U.S. Geological Survey ii Contents Chapter 1. Background and Introduction By A. Hautzinger, P.B. Shafroth, V.B. Beauchamp, and A. Warner ................................................................1 Study Area Description ..................................................................................................................................................2 -
1 the RESTRUCTURING of ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS in RESPONSE to PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell a Dissertation Submitt
THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell 1 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Winter 2019 © Adam B. Mitchell All Rights Reserved THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell Approved: ______________________________________________________ Jacob L. Bowman, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Approved: ______________________________________________________ Mark W. Rieger, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: ______________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Douglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Charles R. Bartlett, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Jeffery J. Buler, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. -
A Survey of Key Arthropod Pests on Common Southeastern Street Trees
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 45(5): September 2019 155 Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 2019. 45(5):155–166 ARBORICULTURE URBAN FORESTRY Scientific Journal of the International& Society of Arboriculture A Survey of Key Arthropod Pests on Common Southeastern Street Trees By Steven D. Frank Abstract. Cities contain dozens of street tree species each with multiple arthropod pests. Developing and implementing integrated pest management (IPM) tactics, such as scouting protocols and thresholds, for all of them is untenable. A survey of university research and extension personnel and tree care professionals was conducted as a first step in identifying key pests of common street tree genera in the Southern United States. The survey allowed respondents to rate seven pest groups from 0 (not pests) to 3 (very important or damaging) for each of ten tree genera. The categories were sucking insects on bark, sucking insects on leaves, defoliators and leafminers, leaf and stem gall forming arthropods, trunk and twig borers and bark beetles, and mites. Respondents could also identify important pest species within categories. Some tree genera, like Quercus and Acer, have many important pests in multiple categories. Other genera like Lirioden- dron, Platanus, and Lagerstroemia have only one or two key pests. Bark sucking insects were the highest ranked pests of Acer spp. Defo- liators, primarily caterpillars, were ranked highest on Quercus spp. followed closely by leaf and stem gallers, leaf suckers, and bark suckers. All pest groups were rated below ‘1’ on Zelkova spp. Identifying key pests on key tree genera could help researchers prioritize IPM development and help tree care professionals prioritize their training and IPM implementation. -
Systematics of Eucolaspis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in New Zealand and Ecology of Hawke’S Bay Lineage
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Systematics of Eucolaspis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in New Zealand and ecology of Hawke’s Bay lineage A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology at Massey University, Manawatu, New Zealand Prasad R.C. Doddala 2012 Abstract Eucolaspis Sharp 1886 includes a group of native leaf beetle species, one or more of which infest exotic fruit crops. Economic losses suffered by organic apple orchards in Hawke’s Bay prompt a revisit to ecological basics of the beetle. Taxonomic, behavioural and ecological knowledge gaps are addressed in the current research project. Phylogenetic analysis, based on cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 region of mitochondrial DNA, revealed that only one genetic lineage infests apples in Hawke’s Bay and that there are only three putative species in mainland New Zealand with another separate species on Three Kings Islands. These findings are well supported by differences in male genitalia shape. Morphometric analyses also supported the phylogeny to some extent. The current findings on host location show that Eucolaspis sp. “Hawke’s Bay” beetles use plant odours to detect and discriminate host and non-host plants. The beetles were attracted to fresh leaf / fruit odour of apple and blackberry, but not to either clover or broad-leaved dock. The beetles were not able to distinguish between damaged and undamaged host plants and between closely related species of host plants just by olfaction. -
Plagiodera Versicolora) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)
JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 51, 2005 (11): 481–507 Contribution to the knowledge of development and harmfulness of imported willow leaf beetle (Plagiodera versicolora) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) J. URBAN Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry Brno, Brno, Czech Republic ABSTRACT: The paper deals with the occurrence, development and harmfulness of imported willow leaf beetle (Pla- giodera versicolora Laich.) in riparian and accompanying stands of the Svratka and Svitava rivers in the region of Brno. Salix fragilis L. and S. × rubens Schr. are the most damaged species there. Imagoes leave wintering places usually at the beginning of May. During about a 60-day period, they damage ca. 23.3 cm2 leaves of S. fragilis and lay 250 to 730 (on average 539) eggs. The whole egg-laying consists of 16 to 48 (on average 35.5) groups with 6 to 26 (on average 15.2) eggs. The fecundity of females hatched in the laboratory is minimally twice lower. Larvae hatch after 5 to 8 (in the laboratory after 4.3) days and damage about 282 mm2 leaves. The development from laying eggs until hatching imagoes of the 1st generation takes about 21 (in the laboratory about 15) days. Imagoes of the 1st generation occur on trees from the end of May to mid-August and die after completing their reproduction. Plagiodera versicolora creates 3 to 4 (in the laboratory 4 to 6) generations during a year. The small part of imagoes of the 2nd generation, predominant part (or all) imagoes of the 3rd generation and under conditions of a tetravoltine development all imagoes of the 4th generation enter a diapause.