Worldwide Distribution and Depth Limits Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Worldwide Distribution and Depth Limits Of Journal of Crustacean Biology Advance Access published 4 February 2021 Journal of Crustacean Biology The Crustacean Society Journal of Crustacean Biology (2021) 1–13. doi:10.1093/jcbiol/ruaa102 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcb/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jcbiol/ruaa102/6128500 by University of Newcastle user on 09 February 2021 Worldwide distribution and depth limits of decapod crustaceans (Penaeoidea, Oplophoroidea) across the abyssal-hadal transition zone of eleven subduction trenches and five additional deep-sea features Jackson A. Swan1, Alan J. Jamieson1, , Thomas D. Linley1, and Paul H. Yancey2 1School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK, and 2Biology Department, Whitman College, Walla Walla, WA 99362, U.S.A Correspondence: Alan J Jamieson; e-mail: [email protected] (Received 6 November 2020; accepted 4 January 2021) ABSTRACT Decapod crustaceans are conspicuous members of marine benthic communities to at least 7,700 m deep. To assess the bathymetric extent of this taxonomic group, baited landers were deployed to across the abyssal-hadal transition zone of 11 subduction trenches spanning the Pacific, Atlantic, Southern, and Indian oceans and additional sites. Decapods were dominated by penaeid shrimps (superfamily Penaeoidea), in particular Benthesicymus Spence Bate, 1881 and Cerataspis Gray, 1828, with the former being found deeper. Benthesicymus cf. crenatus Spence Bate, 1881 was observed in the Kermadec, Mariana, New Hebrides, Puerto Rico, Peru-Chile, Tonga, San Cristobal, and Santa Cruz trenches, plus the South Fiji Basin and the Wallaby- Zenith Fracture Zone. They were not recorded in the Abaco Canyon, Agulhas Fracture Zone, Java Trench, or any of the polar locations. Cerataspis cf. monstrosus Gray, 1828 was present in the Kermadec, Mariana, New Hebrides, Puerto Rico, and Java trenches, the Abaco Canyon, Agulhas Fracture Zone, Wallaby-Zenith Fracture Zone and the South Fiji Basin, but absent from the Tonga, San Cristobal and Santa Cruz trenches. Hymenopenaeus nereus (Faxon, 1893) was only recorded in the Peru-Chile Trench. Unidentified species belonging to superfamily Oplophoroidea were observed to a maximum depth of 6,931 m. Decapods are thus are pri- marily represented at hadal depths by penaeoid shrimps, consistently present at tropical and temperate latitudes to ~7,700 m, while absent from equivalent depths in polar regions. Their maximum depth may be limited due to hydrostatic pressure, while potentially affected by temperature and oxygen in some instances. Muscle samples of three specimens from 6,000 m (Mariana and Kermadec trenches) were found to have high levels of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO; 260 mmol kg–1), the major piezolyte, a protectant against hydrostatic pressure, in other deep-sea organisms. We speculate that physiological limits to TMAO concentration may prevent them from inhabiting the greatest hadal depths. Key Words: abyssal zone, deep-sea fauna, hadal zone, piezolytes, trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), subduction trenches INTRODUCTION that shrimps belonging to superfamilies Penaeoidea (suborder Dendrobranchiata) and Oplophoroidea (infraorder Caridea) Based on the first major trawling efforts at hadal depths were present in the trenches of the Western Pacific (mainly in the 1950s (Wolff, 1960, 1970), members of Decapoda the Japan and Kermadec trenches) to at least 7,703 m and were long thought to have no representatives greater than 6,890 m, respectively. This conclusion was, however, based 5,700 m (Herring, 2002; Blankenship & Levin, 2007), des- on just eight deployments of a baited camera spanning three pite some anecdotal evidence to the contrary (Pérès, 1965; localities in which decapods were observed in the shallowest Hessler et al., 1978). Jamieson et al. (2009a) demonstrated five deployments. © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Crustacean Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected] J. A. SWAN ET AL. The study of Jamieson et al. (2009a) was followed by sev- depth in bony fishes, though as osmoregulators hypo-osmotic to eral other studies that showed that the dominant Penaeoidea seawater, there are no ‘shallow’ osmolytes to replace (Gillett et al., was Benthesicymus crenatus Spence Bate, 1881 and a species of 1997; Samerotte et al., 2007; Yancey et al., 2014). TMAO was pos- Oplophoroidea thought to belong to genus Acanthephyra A. Milne- tulated to play a major role in pressure adaptation in all these Edwards, 1881. The former was clearly attracted to the baited taxa, protecting macromolecules from pressure perturbations. camera by the elevated abundance of lysianassoid amphipods Moreover, bony fishes appear to be limited to depths below 8,400 which they were observed to prey upon, while the latter appeared m, with a limit to the impact of TMAO on osmoregulatory physi- Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcb/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jcbiol/ruaa102/6128500 by University of Newcastle user on 09 February 2021 to be incidental observations as they showed no obvious interest ology possibly creating that limit (Yancey et al., 2014, Linley et al., in the bait or associated fauna (Jamieson et al., 2011, 2012, 2013; 2016; Downing et al., 2018). Linley et al., 2017). The last ten years have seen an increase in biological observa- tions at hadal depths (Jamieson, 2018), yet megafaunal studies tend MATERIALS AND METHODS to focus on either amphipods (e.g., Fujii et al., 2013; Ritchie et al., 2015; Lacey et al., 2016) or fishes (e.g., Linley et al., 2016, 2017). Sampling effort The technological limitations of working at such extreme depths has resulted in a lack of exploratory vehicles rated to 11,000 m Baited camera landers were deployed in every ocean at a number and the near-cessation of bottom trawling at hadal depths since of different geomorphological features (Table 1, Fig. 1). In the the 1950s. As a result, free-fall baited camera and trap landers North Pacific, the primary site was the Mariana Trench, where have become the dominant methodology at hadal depths. The 37 deployments were made between 4,040 and 10,925 m over bias towards fish and amphipod studies mirrors the ease in which three expeditions in 2014, 2017, and 2019. The primary site in these groups are imaged and captured using baited traps and cam- the southwestern Pacific was the Kermadec Trench, where 44 de- eras, respectively. In the pursuit of these more robust quantitative ployments were made between 3,946 and 9,281 m spanning five studies, however, there are several other taxonomic groups that expeditions between 2009 and 2014. Six deployments were made frequent the scientific vehicles that are often cryptic (e.g., Isopoda; between 6,848 and 10,823 m in the neighbouring Tonga Trench Jamieson et al., 2012), infrequent (e.g., Cephalopoda; Jamieson in 2019. Deployments were made in 2013 and 2015 between & Vecchione, 2020) or geographically limited (e.g., Gastropoda; 4,101 and 6,948 m in the New Hebrides Trench east of New Aguzzi et al., 2012). Drawing conclusions on the maximum depth Caledonia (1,600 km north of Kermadec and Tonga trenches), and geographical expanse at such extreme depths is difficult rela- as well as another four deployments between 4,078 and 4,100 tive to amphipods (Downing et al., 2018) and fishes (Yancey et al., m on the South Fiji Basin that connects the New Hebrides and 2014). Kermadec trenches. Five deployments were made further north Decapod crustaceans represents one such overlooked taxo- in the San Cristobal and Santa Cruz trenches off the Solomon nomic group that regularly appears in baited camera datasets. Islands in 2019, in and between the two trenches from 5,906 to The presence of decapods is often limited to a small number of 7,431 m (given the proximity and overlapping sampling, these images and their diversity appears low, but they are consistent in two trenches are hereafter referred to as the Solomon trenches). appearing in images from upper hadal depths. This has meant Two expeditions (2010 and 2018) made 21 deployments between that recent studies tend only to briefly mention the Decapoda 4,051 and 8,074 m in the Peru-Chile Trench, southeastern Pacific, in passing (e.g., Jamieson et al., 2011, 2013; Linley et al., 2017; with the majority in the southern sector, often called the Atacama Jamieson & Vecchione, 2020) and their significance is perhaps Trench. In the Indian Ocean, seven deployments were made in being under-appreciated. the Wallaby-Zenith Fracture Zone (west of Australia) between In the ten years since the first unequivocal finding of hadal 4,730 and 6,537 m in 2017, and a further seven deployments be- decapods, hundreds more lander deployments have been made tween 6,146 and 7,176 m in the Java (Sunda) Trench, south of to the great depths (Jamieson, 2018). In addition to the increase in Indonesia, in 2019. In the Atlantic Ocean, 12 deployments were the number of scientific observations being made at hadal depths, made between 4,040 and 8,370 m in the Puerto Rico Trench on the recent Five Deeps Expedition (Jamieson et al., 2019) provided two expeditions (2018 and 2019), another two deployments in the a platform in which to perform these investigations across multiple Abaco Canyon off the Bahamas in 2018 (4,900 m), and one in the sites spanning every ocean in less than a year (Stewart & Jamieson, Agulhas Fracture Zone southwest of South Africa in 2019 (5,493 2019). m). In the Southern Ocean, three deployments were made in the We collated all baited-camera records from the abyssal-hadal South Shetland Trench between 2,875 and 5,200 m in 2015, and transition zone from the Five Deeps Expedition (Jamieson et al., seven deployments in the South Sandwich Trench between 6,044 2019), the HADEEP projects (Jamieson et al., 2009b), HADES-M and 8,266 m in 2019.
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Decapode.Pdf
    We are pleased and honored to welcome at the Paléospace Museum of Villers-sur-Mer the “6th Symposium on Mesozoic and Cenozoic Decapod Crustaceans”. Villers-sur-Mer is a place universally known by specialists and amateurs of palaeontology due to its famous Vaches Noires cliffs. Villers-sur-Mer has also the distinction of being the only French seaside resort located on the Greenwich Meridian line. The Paléospace is a Museum funded in 2011 with the label Musée de France. Three main animations linked to the Time are presented: palaeontology, astronomy and nature with the neighbouring marsh. The museum is in a constant evolution. For instance, an exhibition specially dedicated to dinosaurs was opened two years ago and a planetarium will open next summer. Every year a very high quality temporary exhibition takes place during the summer period with very numerous animations during all the year. The Paléospace does not stop progressing in term of visitors (56 868 in 2015) and its notoriety is universally recognized both by the other museums as by the scientific community. We are very proud of these unexpected results. We thank the dynamism and the professionalism of the Paléospace team which is at the origin of this very great success. We wish you a very good stay at Villers-sur-Mer, a beautiful visit of the Paléospace and especially an excellent congress. Jean-Paul Durand, Mayor and President of Paléospace MOT DU MAIRE DE VILLERS-SUR-MER Nous sommes très heureux et très honorés d’accueillir à Villers-sur-Mer, le « 6e Symposium on Mesozoic and Cenozoic Decapod Crustaceans » dans le cadre du Paléospace.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an Assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde Biogeographic Marine Ecoregions
    Zootaxa 4413 (3): 401–448 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4413.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2DF9255A-7C42-42DA-9F48-2BAA6DCEED7E Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde biogeographic marine ecoregions JOSÉ A. GONZÁLEZ University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, i-UNAT, Campus de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8584-6731. Abstract The complete list of Canarian marine decapods (last update by González & Quiles 2003, popular book) currently com- prises 374 species/subspecies, grouped in 198 genera and 82 families; whereas the Cape Verdean marine decapods (now fully listed for the first time) are represented by 343 species/subspecies with 201 genera and 80 families. Due to changing environmental conditions, in the last decades many subtropical/tropical taxa have reached the coasts of the Canary Islands. Comparing the carcinofaunal composition and their biogeographic components between the Canary and Cape Verde ar- chipelagos would aid in: validating the appropriateness in separating both archipelagos into different ecoregions (Spalding et al. 2007), and understanding faunal movements between areas of benthic habitat. The consistency of both ecoregions is here compared and validated by assembling their decapod crustacean checklists, analysing their taxa composition, gath- ering their bathymetric data, and comparing their biogeographic patterns. Four main evidences (i.e. different taxa; diver- gent taxa composition; different composition of biogeographic patterns; different endemicity rates) support that separation, especially in coastal benthic decapods; and these parametres combined would be used as a valuable tool at comparing biotas from oceanic archipelagos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Voyage of the “Challenger”
    The Voyage of the "Challenger" From 1872 to 1876 a doughty little ship sailed the seven seas and gathered an unprecedented amount of information about them, thereby founding the science of oceanography by Herbert S. Bailey, Jr. UST 77 years ago this month a spar­ since that pioneering voyage. It was the philosophy at the University of Edin­ decked little ship of 2,300 tons Challenger, rigged with crude but in­ burgh. He did some dredging in the sailed into the harbor of Spithead, genious sounding equipment, that Aegean Sea, studying the distribution JEngland. She was home from a voyage charted what is still our basic map of of flora and fauna and their relation to of three and a half years and 68,890 the world under the oceans. depths, temperatures and other factors. miles over the seven seas. Her expedition Before the Challenger, only a few iso­ Forbes never dredged deeper than about had been a bold attack upon the un­ lated soundings had been taken in the 1,200 feet, and he acquired some curious known in the tradition of the great sea deep seas. Magellan is believed to have notions, including a belief that nothing explorations of the 15th and 16th cen­ made the Rrst. During his voyage around lived in the sea below 1,500 feet. But turies. The unknown she had explored the globe in 1521 he lowered hand lines his pioneering work led the way for the was the sea bottom. When she had left to a depth of perhaps 200 fathoms Challenger expedition.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudodrobna Natator N. Comb., a New Link Between Crustacean Faunas from the Jurassic of Germany and Cretaceous of Lebanon
    geodiversitas 2021 43 8 DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION / PUBLICATION DIRECTOR : Bruno David, Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTEUR EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Didier Merle ASSISTANT DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITOR : Emmanuel Côtez ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Emmanuel Côtez COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : Christine Argot (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Beatrix Azanza (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid) Raymond L. Bernor (Howard University, Washington DC) Alain Blieck (chercheur CNRS retraité, Haubourdin) Henning Blom (Uppsala University) Jean Broutin (Sorbonne Université, Paris, retraité) Gaël Clément (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Ted Daeschler (Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphie) Bruno David (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Gregory D. Edgecombe (The Natural History Museum, Londres) Ursula Göhlich (Natural History Museum Vienna) Jin Meng (American Museum of Natural History, New York) Brigitte Meyer-Berthaud (CIRAD, Montpellier) Zhu Min (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Pékin) Isabelle Rouget (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Sevket Sen (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, retraité) Stanislav Štamberg (Museum of Eastern Bohemia, Hradec Králové) Paul Taylor (The Natural History Museum, Londres, retraité) COUVERTURE / COVER : Réalisée à partir des Figures de l’article/Made from the Figures of the article. Geodiversitas est indexé dans / Geodiversitas is indexed in: – Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) – ISI
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 51. Biological Communities on Seamounts and Other Submarine Features Potentially Threatened by Disturbance
    Chapter 51. Biological Communities on Seamounts and Other Submarine Features Potentially Threatened by Disturbance Contributors: J. Anthony Koslow, Peter Auster, Odd Aksel Bergstad, J. Murray Roberts, Alex Rogers, Michael Vecchione, Peter Harris, Jake Rice, Patricio Bernal (Co-Lead members) 1. Physical, chemical, and ecological characteristics 1.1 Seamounts Seamounts are predominantly submerged volcanoes, mostly extinct, rising hundreds to thousands of metres above the surrounding seafloor. Some also arise through tectonic uplift. The conventional geological definition includes only features greater than 1000 m in height, with the term “knoll” often used to refer to features 100 – 1000 m in height (Yesson et al., 2011). However, seamounts and knolls do not appear to differ much ecologically, and human activity, such as fishing, focuses on both. We therefore include here all such features with heights > 100 m. Only 6.5 per cent of the deep seafloor has been mapped, so the global number of seamounts must be estimated, usually from a combination of satellite altimetry and multibeam data as well as extrapolation based on size-frequency relationships of seamounts for smaller features. Estimates have varied widely as a result of differences in methodologies as well as changes in the resolution of data. Yesson et al. (2011) identified 33,452 seamount and guyot features > 1000 m in height and 138,412 knolls (100 – 1000 m), whereas Harris et al. (2014) identified 10,234 seamount and guyot features, based on a stricter definition that restricted seamounts to conical forms. Estimates of total abundance range to >100,000 seamounts and to 25 million for features > 100 m in height (Smith 1991; Wessel et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Seabed Mapping: a Brief History from Meaningful Words
    geosciences Review Seabed Mapping: A Brief History from Meaningful Words Pedro Smith Menandro and Alex Cardoso Bastos * Marine Geosciences Lab (Labogeo), Departmento Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória-ES 29075-910, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 May 2020; Accepted: 7 July 2020; Published: 16 July 2020 Abstract: Over the last few centuries, mapping the ocean seabed has been a major challenge for marine geoscientists. Knowledge of seabed bathymetry and morphology has significantly impacted our understanding of our planet dynamics. The history and scientific trends of seabed mapping can be assessed by data mining prior studies. Here, we have mined the scientific literature using the keyword “seabed mapping” to investigate and provide the evolution of mapping methods and emphasize the main trends and challenges over the last 90 years. An increase in related scientific production was observed in the beginning of the 1970s, together with an increased interest in new mapping technologies. The last two decades have revealed major shift in ocean mapping. Besides the range of applications for seabed mapping, terms like habitat mapping and concepts of seabed classification and backscatter began to appear. This follows the trend of investments in research, science, and technology but is mainly related to national and international demands regarding defining that country’s exclusive economic zone, the interest in marine mineral and renewable energy resources, the need for spatial planning, and the scientific challenge of understanding climate variability. The future of seabed mapping brings high expectations, considering that this is one of the main research and development themes for the United Nations Decade of the Oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • CRUSTACEA Zooplankton (PELAGIC ADULTS) Sheet 112 ORDER: DECAPODA V
    CONSEIL PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER CRUSTACEA Zooplankton (PELAGIC ADULTS) Sheet 112 ORDER: DECAPODA V. CARIDEA Families : Pasiphaeidae, Oplophoridae, Hippolytidae and Pandalidae (BY A. L. RICE) 1967 https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.4953 Area considered -That part of the Atlantic to the north-east of a line joining Cape Farewell in Greenland and Cape St.Vincent in Portugal, including the Norwegian, Barents, North and Baltic Seas. 2 2 lb 4a Figure 1. Purupusiphue sulcutifrons Smith. (a) lateral view (after KEMP).(b) mandible (after SMITH).- Figure 2. Pusiphaeu sivudo (Risso). Tip of telson. - Figure 3. Pm$hueu multidentutu Esmark. (a) lateral view (after KEMP).(b) immovable finger of second leg. (c) basis and ischium of second leg. - Figure 4. Pusiphueu turdu Kreyer. (a) lateral view (after KEMP).(b) tip of telson. (c) basis and ischium of second leg. DECAPODA CARIDEA Anterior three pairs of thoracic limbs differentiated from the posterior five pairs as maxillipeds. Pleura of the second abdominal segment over- lapping those of the first and third segment. No chelae on the third legs. This definition distinguishes the Caridea from the Penaeidea, which have the pleura of the second abdominal segment not overlapping those of the first segment and also have chelate third legs, and from the Euphausiacea in which none of the thoracic limbs are modified as maxil- lipeds. (Several of the species dealt with in this sheet probably spend a good deal of their time as adults on or close to the sea bottom and make only occasional mid-water excursions. Some of the species are large and quite powerful swimmers and should perhaps be considered as nektonic rather than planktonic; they are included since they are often taken in large or high speed plankton samplers).
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)
    Tuhinga 22: 171–272 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea) John C. Yaldwyn† and W. Richard Webber* † Research Associate, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Deceased October 2005 * Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) (Manuscript completed for publication by second author) ABSTRACT: A checklist of the Recent Decapoda (shrimps, prawns, lobsters, crayfish and crabs) of the New Zealand region is given. It includes 488 named species in 90 families, with 153 (31%) of the species considered endemic. References to New Zealand records and other significant references are given for all species previously recorded from New Zealand. The location of New Zealand material is given for a number of species first recorded in the New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity but with no further data. Information on geographical distribution, habitat range and, in some cases, depth range and colour are given for each species. KEYWORDS: Decapoda, New Zealand, checklist, annotated checklist, shrimp, prawn, lobster, crab. Contents Introduction Methods Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda Suborder DENDROBRANCHIATA Bate, 1888 ..................................... 178 Superfamily PENAEOIDEA Rafinesque, 1815.............................. 178 Family ARISTEIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891..................... 178 Family BENTHESICYMIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891 .......... 180 Family PENAEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa 1843: 57–66 (2008) ISSN 1175-5326 (Print Edition) ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2008 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (Online Edition)
    Zootaxa 1843: 57–66 (2008) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2008 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Alicellidae and Valettiopsidae, two new callynophorate families (Crustacea: Amphipoda) J.K. LOWRY1 & C. DE BROYER2 1Crustacea Section, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Royal Belgian Institue of Natural Sciences, Departement of Invertebrates (Carcinology), 29 Rue Vautier, B-1000 Bruxelles, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Two new families, the Alicellidae fam. nov. and the Valettiopsidae fam. nov., are described based on genera traditionally considered as lysianassoid amphipods. The Alicellidae fam. nov. are deep-sea scavengers often associated with thermal vents. They are distinguished from all other amphipods by a combination of characters which includes a callynophore on antenna 1; a broad, serrate left lacinia mobilis (occasionally narrow or vestigial) and a reduced or vestigial right lacinia mobilis (occasionally broad and serrate); simple or subchelate gnathopod 1; an elongate ischium, rectolinear carpus and propodus and a small dactylus on gnathopod 2 (not mitten-shaped); absence of apical robust setae on uropods 1 and 2 and a deeply cleft telson. The family contains 6 genera: Alicella Chevreux, 1899; Apotectonia Barnard & Ingram, 1990; Dia- tectonia Barnard & Ingram, 1990; Paralicella Chevreux, 1908; Tectovalopsis Barnard & Ingram, 1990; Transtectonia Barnard & Ingram, 1990. The Valettiopsidae fam. nov. are deep-sea scavenging amphipods defined by a combination of characters which includes a callynophore on antenna 1; serrate, curved incisors; a well developed, serrate lacinia mobilis on each mandible, an oblique setal row on the inner plate of maxilla 2, an elongate ischium on gnathopod 2; the absence of robust setae on the apices of uropods 1 and 2 and a deeply cleft telson.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 a History of Marine Science
    OIMS/9 Instructor’s Manual CHAPTER 2 A HISTORY OF MARINE SCIENCE SIX MAIN CONCEPTS The ocean did not prevent the spread of humanity. By the time European explorers set out to “discover” the world, native peoples met them at nearly every landfall. Any coastal culture skilled at raft building or small-boat navigation had economic and nutritional advantages over less skilled competitors. The first global exploratory expeditions were undertaken by Chinese admiral Zheng He beginning in 1405. The three expeditions of Captain James Cook, British Royal Navy, were perhaps the first to apply the principles of scientific investigation to the ocean. The voyage of H.M.S. Challenger (1872 – 1876) was the first extensive expedition dedicated exclusively to research. Modern oceanography is guided by consortia of institutions and governments. MAIN HEADINGS 2.1 UNDERSTANDING THE OCEAN BEGAN WITH VOYAGING FOR TRADE AND EXPLORATION Early Peoples Traveled the Ocean for Economic Reasons Systematic Study of the Ocean Began at the Library of Alexandria Eratosthenes Accurately Calculated the Size and Shape of Earth Seafaring Expanded Human Horizons Viking Raiders Discovered North America The Chinese Undertook Organized Voyages of Discovery 2.2 THE AGE OF EUROPEAN DISCOVERY Prince Henry Launched the European Age of Discovery 2.3 VOYAGING COMBINED WITH SCIENCE TO ADVANCE OCEAN STUDIES Captain James Cook: First Marine Scientist Accurate Determination of Longitude Was the Key to Oceanic Exploration and Mapping 2.4 THE FIRST Scientific Expeditions WERE UNDERTAKEN
    [Show full text]
  • Amphipoda: Gammaridea
    193 Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Chile, 65: 193-246 (2016) SYNOPSIS OF THE SUPERFAMILY LYSIANASSOIDEA (AMPHIPODA: GAMMARIDEA) IN CHILE Jorge Pérez-Schultheiss Área de Zoología, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Interior Parque Quinta Normal s/n, Santiago, Chile Departamento de Sistemática Animal, Centro de Estudios en Biodiversidad (CEBCh), Magallanes 1979, Osorno, Chile. [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4642999-E60E-45DA-BC2C-CBE51EE5DDF6 ABSTRACT An updated checklist of the 39 species of the superfamily Lysianassoidea recorded from Chile is pre- sented, with dichotomous keys to identify the 11 families, genera and species known to date in the country. A synopsis of all described species and new geographic records of some taxa are included. A new genus is described for Uristes serratus Schellenberg, 1931 and U. yamana Chiesa and Alonso de Pina, 2007, and the first record of the family Endevouridae in Chilean waters is presented. Key words: Families, Keys, New records, Exuristes n. gen., Chile. RESUMEN Sinopsis de la superfamilia Lysianassoidea (Amphipoda: Gammaridea) en Chile. Se presenta una lista actualizada de las 39 especies de la superfamilia Lysianassoidea, registradas en Chile, junto con claves dicotómicas para identificar las 11 familias, géneros y especies conocidas hasta la fecha en el país. Se incluye una sinopsis de todas las especies descritas y nuevos registros geográficos de algunos taxa. Se describe un nuevo género para Uristes serratus Schellenberg, 1931 y U. yamana Chiesa and Alonso de Pina, 2007 y se presenta el primer registro de la familia Endevouridae en aguas chilenas. Palabras clave: Familias, Claves, Nuevos registros, Exuristes n.
    [Show full text]