Gender Fairness Strategies Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gender Fairness Strategies Project THE GENDER FAIRNESS STRATEGIES PROJECT National Association of Women Judges Implementation National Judicial College Resources National Center Directory for State Courts American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Profession National Judicial Education Program COMPILED BY THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL EDUCATION PROGRAM* State Justice SJI Institute * A project of the NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund in cooperation with the National Association of Women Judges. Gender Fairness Strategies Project: Implementation Resources Directory Compiled by Lynn Hecht Schafran, Esq. Director with Norma J. Wikler, Ph.D. Founding Director and Jill Crawford Program Associate National Judicial Education Program (A Project of the NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund in cooperation with the National Association of Women Judges) Justice Betty Weinberg Ellerin Chair Gender Fairness Strategies Project National Association of Women Judges, National Center for State Courts, The National Judicial College, American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Profession, National Judicial Education Program 1998 © National Judicial Education Program to Promote Equality for Women and Men in the Courts, December 1998 Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has written of the task forces on gender bias in the courts: Self-examination of the court’s facilities and practices... can yield significant gains. First, such projects enhance public understanding that gender equality is an important goal for a nation concerned with full utilization of the talent of all its people. Second, self-examination enables an institution to identify, and devise means to eliminate the harmful effects of gender bias. Third, close attention to the existence of unconscious prejudice can prompt and encourage those who work in the courts to listen to women’s voices, and to accord women’s proposals the respect customarily accorded ideas advanced by men. And finally, self-inspection heightens appreciation that progress does not occur automatically, but requires a concerted effort to change habitual modes of thinking and action.* This Implementation Resources Directory is for all those who want to be part of that “concerted effort.” *Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Foreword to THE REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON GENDER, PREPARED FOR THE D.C. CIRCUIT TASK FORCE ON GENDER, RACE, AND ETHNIC BIAS, reprinted in 84 GEO. L.J. 1651 (1996). A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Directory reflects sixteen years of work by the more than forty state Task Forces on Gender Bias in the Courts and the committees charged with implementing their recommendations. A reform effort such as this requires many heads and many hands. We gratefully acknowledge the dedication and countless hours donated to the national gender bias task force movement by thousands of individuals across the country, many of whom will soon complete their second decade of commitment to eliminating gender bias in the courts. On behalf of the five partners in the Gender Fairness Strategies Project— the National Association of Women Judges, the National Judicial College, the National Center for State Courts, the American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Profession and the National Judicial Education Program— we thank our chair, Justice Betty Ellerin, for her commitment to making this project a reality and her guidance in its development. We also thank the State Justice Institute for its long term support of the national gender bias task force movement and for funding this project, which will bring the movement into its third decade with renewed energy. We are grateful to program manager Pamela Bulloch for her valuable suggestions for this Directory. With respect to the production of this Directory, we thank the Task Force and Implementation Committee members and staff who responded to a lengthy survey and provided materials for inclusion in the Directory. We are indebted to NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund legal and undergraduate interns, Debbie Fruendt, Margaret Hu, Jana Jacobson, Lisa Osiecki and Sabrina Wu, for help with research, cite checking and word processing. Funding for the interns was provided by the Everett Foundation and the Helena Rubenstein Foundation. A special thanks is due to Carol Schaeffer and Meredith Stern for designing the Directory cover. Our thanks to all of you who have taken an interest in the critical judicial reform effort to eliminate bias in the courts. We have created this resource to make your job easier. Use it well and keep the movement going. National Judicial Education Program to Promote Equality for Women and Men in the Courts* Lynn Hecht Schafran, Esq. Director Norma J. Wikler Founding Director Jill Crawford Program Associate *A Project of the NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund in cooperation with the National Association of Women Judges. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface . 1 Introduction to this Directory The National Gender Bias Task Force Movement .............. 2 The Need for this Implementation Resources Directory ........... 3 How the Directory was Developed ....................... 4 How the Items Described in this Directory were Selected ......... 4 Intended Audiences for this Directory ..................... 5 How to Use the Directory How to Obtain the Materials Described in this Directory ......... 6 Plan for Institutionalizing the Work of the Gender Bias Task Forces and Implementation Committees ............................ 7 Key Components of a State Institutionalization Plan . 8 Section 1: Products Bench Books . 11 Case Citations to Gender Bias Task Force Reports Opinions Listed by State and Federal Circuit . 12 Opinions Listed by Topic . 17 Codes of Conduct for: Judges ................................. 22 Court Employees .......................... 26 Lawyers ............................... 29 Complaint Procedures Formal . 33 Informal . 33 Court Chid Care .............................. 36 Court Conduct Handbooks ......................... 38 Court Employment ............................. 40 Court Rules .................................. 49 Court Watching ............................... 51 Data Collection Tools and Databases ................... 52 Education for: Court Personnel . 54 Judges . 56 Judicial Disciplinary Commissions . 75 Judicial Nominating Commissions . 75 Law Enforcement Agencies . 76 Lawyers . 77 The Public . 81 Evaluation (See Progress Assessment and Evaluation) Gender-Neutral Language ......................... 84 Jury Instructions ............................... 86 Legislation ................................... 88 Newsletters and Other Publications .................... 99 Progress Assessments and Evaluation .................. 100 Videotapes .................................. 106 Section 2: Substantive Law Areas Alimony (See Divorce) Child Abuse and Neglect . 111 Child Support . 112 Civil Damages . 114 Court Interaction . 115 Custody and Visitation . 116 Divorce . 122 Domestic Violence . 125 Equitable Distribution (See Divorce) Mediation . 139 Prisons (See Sentencing and Prisons) Rape and Sexual Assault . 140 Sentencing and Prisons . 142 Sexual Harassment Continuing Legal Education (See Education for Lawyers) Court Employment (See Court Employment) Judicial Disciplinary Commissions (See Education for Judicial Disciplinary Commissions) Law Schools (See Collaboration: Law Schools) Spousal Support (See Divorce) Section 3: Collaboration with Others Bar Associations . 147 Community Outreach . 152 Law Enforcement Agencies (See Education for Law Enforcement Agencies) Law Schools . 154 Appendices A. Descriptions of the five national organizations sponsoring the Gender Fairness Strategies Project: National Association of Women Judges National Judicial College National Center for State Courts ABA Commission on the Status of Women National Judicial Education Program B. List of Gender Bias Task Force Implementation Committees with Contact Names and Addresses C. State and Federal Case Citations to Gender Bias Task Force Reports - Annotated D. Chart - “Responsibility for Recommendations by Agency” from the Report of the State Bar of Michigan Task Force on Racial/Ethnic and Gender Issues in the Courts and Legal Profession (1998) (excerpts) E. Descriptions of the National Judicial Education Program and the Family Violence Prevention Fund Model Judicial Education Curricula P REFACE THE GENDER FAIRNESS STRATEGIES PROJECT: Identifying Our Resources and Maximizing Our Gains The Gender Fairness Strategies Project, funded by the State Justice Institute, is being carried out by the National Association of Women Judges, the National Judicial College, the National Center for State Courts, the American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Profession and the National Judicial Education Program*, five national organizations deeply involved in the twenty-year judicial reform effort to eliminate gender bias in the courts. The intent of the Gender Fairness Strategies Project is to promote states’ efforts to eliminate gender bias in the courts, and to define an agenda for moving this vital court reform effort forward in the next decade. The Project has three components. The first is this Implementation Resources Directory, based on a nationwide survey of the committees charged with implementing the recommendations of the forty state supreme court task forces on gender bias in the courts. The second is a Strategic Meeting of representatives from twelve geographically diverse task force implementation committees, convened in January 1999, to explore their experiences with implementation efforts and their strategies for
Recommended publications
  • Office of Lawyer Regulation Annual Report 2012-2013
    REGULATION OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION IN WISCONSIN ________________________________________________________ FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 __________________________________________________________________ Report of the Lawyer Regulation System Keith L. Sellen, Director Attorney Rod Rogahn, Chairperson Office of Lawyer Regulation Board of Administrative Oversight 110 East Main Street, Suite 315, Madison, WI 53703 (608) 267-7274 www.wicourts.gov/olr ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 Introduction Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 21.03(6)(n) and 21.10(2)(e), the Office of Lawyer Regulation and Board of Administrative Oversight are filing this fiscal year 2012-2013 report on the lawyer regulation system. Composition of the Lawyer Regulation System “The lawyer regulation system is established to carry out the Supreme Court’s constitutional responsibility to supervise the practice of law and protect the public from misconduct by persons practicing law in Wisconsin.” SCR Chapter 21, Preamble. The composition and organization of the lawyer regulation system is depicted in Appendix 1. The persons currently serving in these organizations are identified in Appendix 2. Following is a description of the components. Supreme Court The Supreme Court supervises the lawyer regulation system, determines attorney misconduct and medical incapacity, and imposes discipline or directs other appropriate action in proceedings filed with the Court. Office of Lawyer Regulation The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) consists of the Director, investigative and support staff, litigation counsel, and retained counsel. The office has the following duties. • To receive and to respond to inquiries and grievances relating to attorneys. • To investigate allegations of attorney misconduct or medical incapacity. • To divert matters into an alternative to discipline program.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Laws Are Yours" Is the Latest in a Series of Projects Undertaken by the Lawyers' Wives of Wisconsin to Further Public
    Appendix 29 1 'The Laws Are Yours" is the latest in a series of projects undertaken by the Lawyers' Wives of Wisconsin to further public understanding of the law and of the legal profession . Lawyers' Wives of Wisconsin has approximately 1400 members in 24 charter county groups throughout the state. Among their varied activities are Law Day observances, welcoming of newly naturalized citizens and the recently completed law-related education program, "You and the Law." A scholarship for a law student is presented annually to each Law School in Wisconsin. We hope that you, the reader, will have a better understanding of the Wisconsin legal system after reading "The Laws Are Yours." We have not attempted to answer specific questions about the law since facts, situations, circumstances and persons differ and the application of the law to such cases may also vary. For specific answers to legal advice it is suggested that you consult a lawyer in your community. We would appreciate your comments: Please send them to: Lawyers' Wives of Wisconsin c/o 4001 Haven Avenue Racine, Wisconsin, 53405 1979 Appendix 29 2 INTRODUCTION We live in a land of freedom, free to do as we wish and to go where we please, as long as we do not infringe on the rights of others. It has been said that one's right to swing his fist ends at the point where the other fellow's nose begins. Law began when man discovered he could not live alone - that there had to be rules in order for people to live together.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Distance: Implementing Videoconferencing in Wisconsin Manual
    Bridging the Distance: Implementing Videoconferencing in Wisconsin Revised: August 2017 Prepared by: Wisconsin Supreme Court Planning and Policy Advisory Committee Videoconferencing Subcommittee Planning and Policy Advisory Committee Chief Justice Patience Drake Roggensack, Chair 16 East State Capitol P.O. Box 1688 Madison, WI 53701 This page is intentionally left blank. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 PPAC Videoconferencing Subcommittee Members 2017 .......................................................................... 4 Section I. What is Videoconferencing? .................................................................................................... 5 Potential Benefits ................................................................................................................................ 5 Implementation Considerations .......................................................................................................... 5 Non-Courtroom Uses of Videoconferencing ...................................................................................... 5 Section II. Planning for Successfully Implementing Videoconferencing ............................................... 7 Implementation Considerations .......................................................................................................... 7 Videoconferencing and Electronic Filing ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid for the John C. Satterfield/American Bar Association Collection (MUM00685)
    University of Mississippi eGrove Archives & Special Collections: Finding Aids Library November 2020 Finding Aid for the John C. Satterfield/American Bar Association Collection (MUM00685) Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/finding_aids Recommended Citation John C. Satterfield/American Bar Association Collection (MUM00685). The Department of Archives and Special Collections, J.D. Williams Library, The University of Mississippi. This Finding Aid is brought to you for free and open access by the Library at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Archives & Special Collections: Finding Aids by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University of Mississippi Libraries Finding-Aid for the John C. Satterfield/American Bar Association Collection MUM00685 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACCESS RESTRICTIONS Summary Information Open for research. This collection is stored at an off-site facility. Researchers interested in using this collection Biographical Note must contact Archives and Special Collections at least two business days in advance of their planned visit. Scope Note Administrative Information Return to Table of Contents » Related Materials Access Restrictions SUMMARY INFORMATION Biographical Sources Collection Inventory Repository University of Mississippi Libraries Title John C. Satterfield/American Bar Association Collection Date 1928-1974 1958-1970. Extent 25.0 Linear feet General Physical Description note 51 boxes & one oil portrait (78 linear feet). Location note Library Annex Abstract The John C. Satterfield Collection contains files related to Satterfield's involvement in the American Bar Association which he presided over from 1961-1962. The papers also include speeches and case files associated with his representation of Mississippi Governor Ross Barnett during the 1962 University of Mississippi integration crisis as well as consolidated cases of public school boards across Mississippi and the South seeking to delay desegregation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bostonbarjournala Publication of the Boston Bar Association
    FALL 2009 BostonBarJournalA Publication of the Boston Bar Association Timely Justice Threatened by Fiscal Challenges A Move to Streamline the Civil Justice System Crawford Comes to the Lab: Melendez-Diaz and the Scope of the Confrontation Clause Residual Class Action Funds: Supreme Court Identifies IOLTA as Appropriate Beneficiary Challenges and Opportunities for New Lawyers Maintaining Client Confidences: Developments at the Supreme Judicial Court and First Circuit in 2009 If Pro Bono is Not an Option, Consider Volunteering GROW YOUR 401(k) WISELY Six things you won’t hear from other 401(k) providers... We were created as a not-for-profit 1. entity, and we exist to provide a benefit We leverage the buying power of the 2. ABA to eliminate firm expenses and minimize participant expenses Our fiduciary tools help you manage 3. your liabilities and save valuable time Our investment menu has three tiers to 4. provide options for any type of investor, and our average expense is well below the industry average for mutual funds We eliminated commissions, which erode 5. your savings, by eliminating brokers We have benefit relationships with 29 6. state bar and 2 national legal associations.* LEARN HOW No other provider has more than one. YOU CAN * Alabama State Bar Illinois State Bar Association State Bar of Nevada Rhode Island Bar Association GROW YOUR State Bar of Arizona Indiana State Bar Association New Hampshire Bar Association State Bar of Texas Arkansas Bar Association Iowa State Bar Association State Bar of New Mexico Vermont Bar Association
    [Show full text]
  • Paralegal Regulation by State
    Paralegal Regulation by State Updated October 2019 NFPA Regulation Review Committee Tom Stephenson, ILAP; Coordinator 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Regulation by State ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Alabama ................................................................................................................................................................3 Alaska ....................................................................................................................................................................3 Arizona ..................................................................................................................................................................4 Arkansas ................................................................................................................................................................4 California ...............................................................................................................................................................5 Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................6 Connecticut ...........................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Simplifying the Organization of the Courts of the State Roy P
    Marquette Law Review Volume 9 Article 4 Issue 1 December 1924 Simplifying the Organization of the Courts of the State Roy P. Wilcox Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Roy P. Wilcox, Simplifying the Organization of the Courts of the State, 9 Marq. L. Rev. 25 (1924). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol9/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SIMPLIFYING THE ORGANIZATION OF THE COURTS OF THE STATE* By Roy P. WILCOX T HE reform of institutions consists, usually, in adapting them to changed conditions. This is largely true in speaking of reform or change in the organization of the courts of Wisconsin. Simplicity of form is the prime requisite. Numerous courts with varying, conflicting, or perhaps, concurrent jurisdiction do not make for high efficiency in ad- ministering justice. Judicial effort is wasted. Economy of cost is impossible, so that we may say quite confidently that a multiplicity of courts means failure of efficiency and extravagance in cost. While justice is not a matter of purchase, nor is it, in any sense, a business, there is no good reason why business principles should not be applied to the organization of courts, as well as-to the organization of business. The business man has a vision or plan in mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Nationally, approximately 40% of new attorneys work at firms consisting of more than 50 lawyers. Therefore, a large percentage of practicing attorneys work for small firms (fewer than 50 attorneys). Small firms generally do not have formalized recruiting procedures or a set “hiring season” when they recruit summer law clerks, school-year law clerks, or entry-level attorneys. Instead, these firms hire on an as-needed basis, and they hire year round. To secure employment with a small firm, students and lawyers alike need to be proactive in getting their name and interests out in the community. Applicants should not only apply directly to these firms, but they should connect via law school, community, and bar association activities. In this directory, you will find state-by-state hyperlinks to regional directories, bar associations, newspapers, and job banks that can be used to jump-start a small firm search. ALABAMA State/Regional Bar Associations Alabama Bar Association: http://www.alabar.org Birmingham Bar Association: http://www.birminghambar.org Mobile Bar Association: http://www.mobilebar.org Specialty Bar Associations Alabama Defense Lawyers Association: http://www.adla.org Alabama Trial Lawyers Association: http://www.alabamajustice.org Major Newspapers Birmingham News: http://www.al.com/birmingham Mobile Register: http://www.al.com/mobile Legal & Non-Legal Resources & Publications State Lawyers.com: http://alabama.statelawyers.com EINNEWS: http://www.einnews.com/alabama Birmingham Business Journal: http://birmingham.bizjournals.com
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Probate Court, 45 Marq
    Marquette Law Review Volume 45 Article 7 Issue 4 Spring 1962 The iH story of the Probate Court Eugene A. Haertle Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Eugene A. Haertle, The History of the Probate Court, 45 Marq. L. Rev. 546 (1962). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol45/iss4/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE HISTORY OF THE PROBATE COURT* EUGENE M. HAERTLE** The Norman Conquest, 1066 A. D., produced a series of changes in the government, judicial system, and social organization of England which affected the development of the laws of wills, relating to real estate, and the laws of testament, relating to personal property. Before the Norman Conquest there had been no separate ecclesiasti- cal courts in England. The clergy took part in the proceedings of the secular courts. William the Conqueror separated the ecclesiastical courts from the secular courts. In the field of probate the result was that the ecclesiastical courts ultimately acquired jurisdiction of suc- cession to personalty, including testamentary succession, while the secular courts retained jurisdiction of succession to freehold interests in realty, including jurisdiction over wills. The Norman Conquest also hastened a set of changes in the or- ganizataion of England, the result of which is known as feudalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporting an Attorney to the Bar
    Reporting An Attorney To The Bar Reptile Andreas never elutriate so consummately or textures any iritis thereagainst. Voluptuous and thoroughbred Isidore always lignify greatly and inactivating his logopedics. Staffard bumbles universally as mournful Valentin hornswoggling her breadth mayest prepositively. The first resolve the jurisdiction upon the state bar and all documentary evidence, reports to your patience and any. If no express duty and supervision of the state bar as an attorney to the reporting decision customarily is tasked with? For an appropriate bar of reporting attorney discipline, report recommending stronger than one month or civil and prompt and confidence in. All lawyers who reported. Upon receipt which a complaint, it is examined by a staff attorney remains the grievance committee to evaluate whether or not it is legal matter concern the committee can pick should investigate. You fret about several close this Web Part. Complain usually a Lawyer's Conduct Wyoming State Bar. How holy I report abuse is or financial exploitation of an elderly or commercial person. The essential purpose into the lawyer discipline system name to threshold the public. Automatically conducted in an opinion no choice other documents which will contact information and committees which would otherwise have been thoroughly screened and approval by communicating poorly with food stamps, bar attorney to an employee is prepared. If the complainant does not agree not participate read the resolution conference by returning the signed consent award, a marriage notice then be sent into the complainant an additional ten days to respond. You are using a browser that is not bother by default.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Wisconsin Municipal Court Study
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov.----- tfo.·~f}r 1;1 ., I;J-~K] STATE OF WISCONSIN MUNICIPAL COURT STUDY 90145 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material in mi­ crofiche only has been granted by National Center for State Courts to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. Executive Summary, Final Report from National Center for State Courts MAY, 1982 DIRECTOR OF STATE COURTS OFFICE OF COURT OPERATIONS .' 1 ~uprrmp Q1nurl nf llisrnn.ain lirtonr of ~tatt moms 110 iE. :lhdU ft;trert. loom .5113 ~lht~i!lon. 'lfisrnusin 53703 J. Denis Moran Bruce F. Beilfuss Edward F. McClain Director of State Courts Chief Justice Deputy Director for Court Operations Telephone 608·260·312'1 July, 1982 The only exposure to the courts most Wisconsin residents will ever have is in municipal courts. ~~though they decide only cases involving municipal ordinance violations, the volume of those cases is so great that municipal courts handle more cases each year than all our circuit courts. The judges who run these courts have a heavy responsibility and a great opportunity for public service. In 1981, the Qffice of the Director of State Courts and the Admini­ strative Committee on Courts, under a grant from the Wisconsin Council on Criminal Justice, commissioned a study of municipal courts in Wis­ consin.
    [Show full text]
  • Statute of Limitations Quick Guide (During Covid-19 Pandemic)
    STATUTE OF OVERVIEW Written by USLAW NETWORK member attorneys, the Compendium takes LIMITATIONS advantage of local knowledge and experience in each of the jurisdictions in which USLAW NETWORK firms practice. QUICK GUIDE (DURING COVID- 19 PANDEMIC) (Version released: December 2020) USLAW.ORG • 800- 231-9110 Contents ALABAMA .................................................................................................................................................. 3 ARIZONA..................................................................................................................................................... 4 ARKANSAS ................................................................................................................................................. 4 CALIFORNIA .............................................................................................................................................. 5 COLORADO ................................................................................................................................................ 7 CONNECTICUT .......................................................................................................................................... 8 DELAWARE ................................................................................................................................................ 9 FLORIDA ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]