DOCSLIB.ORG

Paralegal Regulation by State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paralegal Regulation by State Paralegal Regulation by State Updated October 2019 NFPA Regulation Review Committee Tom Stephenson, ILAP; Coordinator 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Regulation by State ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Alabama ................................................................................................................................................................3 Alaska ....................................................................................................................................................................3 Arizona ..................................................................................................................................................................4 Arkansas ................................................................................................................................................................4 California ...............................................................................................................................................................5 Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................6 Connecticut ...........................................................................................................................................................8 Delaware ...............................................................................................................................................................9 District of Columbia ...............................................................................................................................................9 Florida ...................................................................................................................................................................9 Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Hawaii ................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Idaho ................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Illinois.................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Indiana ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Iowa .................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Kansas ................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Kentucky ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Louisiana ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Maine .................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Maryland ............................................................................................................................................................. 16 Massachusetts ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 Michigan ............................................................................................................................................................. 17 Minnesota ........................................................................................................................................................... 17 Mississippi ........................................................................................................................................................... 18 Missouri .............................................................................................................................................................. 19 Montana.............................................................................................................................................................. 19 Nebraska ............................................................................................................................................................. 21 Nevada ................................................................................................................................................................ 21 New Hampshire ................................................................................................................................................... 21 New Jersey .......................................................................................................................................................... 22 New Mexico ......................................................................................................................................................... 23 New York ............................................................................................................................................................. 24 North Carolina ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 North Dakota ....................................................................................................................................................... 26 Ohio .................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Oklahoma ............................................................................................................................................................ 27 Oregon ................................................................................................................................................................ 27 Pennsylvania ....................................................................................................................................................... 29 Rhode Island ........................................................................................................................................................ 30 South Carolina ..................................................................................................................................................... 30 South Dakota ....................................................................................................................................................... 31 Tennessee ........................................................................................................................................................... 32 Texas ................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Utah .................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Vermont .............................................................................................................................................................. 35 Virginia ................................................................................................................................................................ 36 Washington ......................................................................................................................................................... 36 West Virginia ....................................................................................................................................................... 39 Wisconsin ............................................................................................................................................................ 40 Wyoming ............................................................................................................................................................. 41 Committee Members ................................................................................................................................. 41 Revision History......................................................................................................................................... 42 Citations ...................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Student's Guide to the Leading Law Firms and Sets in the UK
    2021 The student’s guide to the leading law firms and sets in the UK e-Edition chambers-student.com Connect with us on cbaK Travers Smith’s mix of formal and informal training is second to none. It enables those coming fresh from law school to quickly become familiar with complex concepts and provides them with the necessary tools to throw themselves into their team’s work right from the start. www.traverssmith.com 10 Snow Hill, London EC1A 2AL +44 (0) 20 7295 3000 Contents Law school The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) p.37 An introduction to the SQE with ULaw p.41 Solicitors’ timetable p.43 Barristers’ timetable p.44 The Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL) p.45 The Legal Practice Course (LPC) p.49 The Bar Course p.52 How to fund law school p.55 Law school course providers p.57 Contents https://www.chambersstudent.co.uk The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) From 2021 there’s going to be an entirely new way of qualifying as a solicitor replacing the GDL, LPC and training contract. If you’re thinking ‘SQE OMG!’ – don’t fear: here’s a quick guide. What’s going on? volve a practical testing ‘pilot’ with students. The regula- In winter 2016/17 the Solicitors Regulation Authority tor has stated that it expects various other providers (i.e. (SRA) dropped a bombshell on the legal profession: it was probably law schools and the current GDL/LPC providers) going ahead with its plan for the Solicitors Qualifying Ex- to offer preparatory courses for both stages of the SQE.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2004
    November 2004 John P. Macy, Chair Members: James M. Brennan Heather Marie Hunt R. George Burnett Robert John Lightfoot, II Michael L. Eckert Benton C. Strauss G. Jeffrey George Jo A. Swamp Beth Ermatinger Hanan Albert E. (Ted) Wehde Staff Liaisons: Daniel Rossmiller & Cathleen Dettmann 0 FOREWORD “The dictionary defines "justice" as fairness. The system for administration of our laws is called the justice system because the single most important principle upon which that system is premised is fairness. Our laws, however, are complicated. They are created by local, state, tribal and federal legislative and administrative bodies. They are interpreted and enforced by local, state, tribal and federal courts, administrative and other agencies. The volume and complexity of the laws and the procedures for their administration have made it increasingly difficult to effectively utilize the justice system without the help of a lawyer. That means for those who cannot afford a lawyer, access to the system does not necessarily mean access to justice. “Publicly funded legal services, or "legal aid," evolved in an effort to insure that poverty was not an insurmountable barrier to justice. Financial and political support for this effort has been inconsistent over the years.” — Washington State Access to Justice Board, Introductory Paragraph, Hallmarks of an Effective Statewide Civil Legal Services System, Revised February 20, 2004 “The question has been raised, should we regard the provision of civil legal services for the poor as part of the central mission of state courts? My answer is, how can we not? We have progressive statutes providing legal remedies for many of the problems experienced by people who responded to our survey — for example, landlord-tenant disputes, domestic violence, and consumer fraud.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor and Employment Law Paralegal
    LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW PARALEGAL 2007 Revision and update drafted by Kimberly Browning, Holland & Hart, LLP. 2007 review by Brian Mumaugh, Esq., of Holland & Hart, LLP. Originally drafted by Kathy Sercel and David Steadmon. Originally reviewed by Daniel Satriana, Jr., Esq., of Hall & Evans, LLC and Glenn D. Chadwick, Esq., of Beattie & Chadwick. ALL OF THE BELOW DUTIES ARE ASSUMED TO, AND MUST BE, UNDER THE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED ATTORNEY. Labor and Employment is a unique area of law that encompasses many different specialties and sub-specialties. A paralegal must have extensive knowledge of the state and federal rules of civil procedures, along with knowing the practice procedures of the various federal, state and other related governmental agencies, in order to assist a Labor and Employment lawyer. The following material provides a general guideline of a paralegal’s duties within the context of this specialty. A. EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION 1. ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act): a. Conduct the initial review of the employees claim file. b. Create detailed claim file summaries. c. Assist attorney during settlement, mediation, arbitration and trial. d. Draft settlement agreements. 2. EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) and CCRD (Colorado Civil Rights Division): a. Investigate discrimination claims under federal or state statutes. b. Assist attorney during trial, arbitration, grievance hearings, and other formal proceedings for grievance and/or discharge. c. Assist employers with drafting of proposed policies and procedures which comply with related state, federal, local or agency employment practice regulations. 3. National Relations Labor Board (NLRB)/Union Activity: a. Assist employers with personnel policies and practices to avoid unionization.
    [Show full text]
  • Handout Book Template.Pub
    2019 Masters-In-Equity Bench Bar 19-41 Friday, October 11, 2019 presented by The South Carolina Bar Continuing Legal Education Division http://www.scbar.org/CLE SC Supreme Court Commission on CLE Course No. 196251 2019 Masters-In-Equity Bench Bar DATE This program qualifies for 6.0 MCLE, 1.0 LEPR, 1.0 SA/MH, 2.0 BKY SC Supreme Commission on CLE Course # 196251 8:30 a.m. Registration 8:55 a.m. Welcome and Opening Remarks Hon. Joseph K. Coffey Coffey & McKenzie, PA 9:00 a.m. Emotional Intelligence for Lawyers and Judges Henry L. Deneen Murphy & Grantland, PA 10:00 a.m. The ABA and Cybersecurity Ethics for Lawyers Jamie Khan McCullough Khan, LLC Richard J. Krenmayer Stasmayer Inc. 11:00 a.m. Break 11:15 a.m. Equity Principles Stephen A. Spitz Stevens & Lee 12:15 p.m. Lunch (on your own) 1:30 p.m. Resistible Force Meets Immovable Object: How Your Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Fare on Appeal Hon. George “Buck” James, Jr. S.C. Supreme Court 2:30 p.m. Break 2:45 p.m. Pinckney Act W.T. Geddings, Jr. Geddings Law Firm 3:45 p.m. Orders of Reference and Surplus Funds and Bankruptcy, Oh My! Reginald P. Corley Scott & Corley, PA Hon. John E. Waites U.S. Bankruptcy Court 4:45 p.m. Adjourn Masters‐In‐Equity Bench Bar SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES (by order of presentation) Hon. Joseph K. Coffey Coffey & McKenzie, PA Manning, SC (course planner) Judge Coffey received his Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from The Citadel in 1992, and his J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal Board of Editors the Kansas Bar Association Is Dedicated to Advancing the Professionalism and Legal Michael T
    THE OURNAL of the Kansas Bar Association J June 2007 • Volume 76 • No. 6 New Horizons: Kansas Adopts Ethics 2000 Changes KBF & KBA reach residentsPage – 6 out to Greensburg area THE OURNAL of the Kansas Bar Association JJune 2007 • Volume 76 • No. 6 ITEMS OF INTEREST 5 My Home Town — Our Home REGULAR FEATURES State 4 President’s Message 13 Law Student’s Corner 7 Welcome Spring 2007 14 Tech Tips Admittees to the Kansas Bar 15 Members in the News 15 Jest Is For All 16 9 Johnson County Judge Obituaries 31 Appointed to Court of Appeals Appellate Decisions 35 Appellate Practice Reminders 6 “When Tragedy Strikes, the 41 Classifieds World Suddenly Becomes 10 IOLTA Grant Spotlights on 43 CLE Docket Very Small” Topeka Youth Court, Heart to The KBF and KBA Reach out Heart, Kansas Legal Services, to Greensburg Area Residents and SAFEHOME Cover photo by David Gilham, KBA staff 10 IOLTA Honor Roll Banks 11 Career Day Students — Unpaid AOL Job Coaches Customers 12 One of the Best Trial Lawyers to Practice in Kansas see Page 41 for 20 New Horizons: Kansas Important Adopts Ethics 2000 18 Hey Man, You Got a Match? Changes The Employment Eligibility Information By J. Nick Badgerow Verification and Anti-Identity Theft Act Our Mission: The Journal Board of Editors The Kansas Bar Association is dedicated to advancing the professionalism and legal Michael T. Jilka Overland Park skills of lawyers, providing services to its members, serving the community through Assistant Executive Director: Casey Law McPherson advocacy of public policy issues, encouraging public understanding of the law, and René Eichem Michelle Reinert Mahieu Dodge City promoting the effective administration of our system of justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Directory MICHIGAN
    134 Congressional Directory MICHIGAN THIRD DISTRICT VERNON J. EHLERS, Republican, of Grand Rapids, MI; born Feburary 6, 1934 in Pipestone, MN; educated at home by his parents; attended Calvin College, Ph.D. in nuclear physics from University of California at Berkeley; tenure of service in teaching, scientific re- search, and community service; NATO post-doctoral research fellow; research physicist at Law- rence Berkeley Laboratory and lecturer in physics at the University of California; named an Outstanding Educator of the Year, 1970±73; co-authored two books on the environment: Earthkeeping in the '90s: Stewardship of Creation and Earthkeeping: Christian Stewardship of Natural Resources; co-authored two books on world hunger; elected to the Kent County Com- mission, 1975; elected to the State House of Representatives, 1983; appointed to INTERSET, a science advisory committee; chairman, National Conference of State Legislatures Environment Committee; science advisor to then-Congressman Gerald Ford; president of his class during the 104th Congress, midwest regional vice president during the 103rd Congress; served as a mem- ber of the House Republican Transition Team; assigned to lead efforts in revamping the U.S. House of Representatives computer system; full-time career in public office, 1983; member and former elder of Eastern Avenue Christian Reformed Church, Grand Rapids; married to the former Johanna Meulink; four children: Heidi, Brian, Marla, and Todd; committees: Education and the Workforce; House Administration; Joint Committee on the Library; vice chairman, Science; Transportation and Infrastructure; elected to the 103rd Congress, December, 1993 in a special election; reelected to each succeeding Congress. Office Listings http://www.house.gov/ehlers [email protected] 1714 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515±2203 ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Paralegal Support Network
    The Paralegal’s Handbook Paralegal Support Network Table of Contents Chapter 1: How to Use this Handbook Chapter 2: The Role of the Paralegal Worker Chapter 3: Law and Society Chapter 4: Institutions for the Implementation of the Law Chapter 5: The Constitution Chapter 6: Human Rights Chapter 7: Democracy Chapter 8: Elections Chapter 9: Governance Chapter 10: Gender and Development Chapter 11: Gender-based Violence Chapter 12: Employment and Labour Relations Chapter 13: Claims Arising from Personal Harm Chapter 14: Business Relations and Contracts Chapter 15: Land Law Chapter 16: Family Relations and Succession Chapter 17: Crimes Chapter 18: Court Procedures Chapter 19: Dispute Resolution and Conflict Management Chapter 20: Community Mobilization Chapter 21: Children and the Law Chapter 22: Environment and Natural Resource Management Chapter 23: Human Rights Institution Building Chapter 1 How to Use This Handbook Why the Handbook? This handbook has been developed by the Paralegal Support Network (PASUNE). The handbook was developed in fulfillment of the mandate of PASUNE. PASUNE as a network of leading human rights organizations involved in paralegal training has been working towards standardizing the content and methods of training paralegals in Kenya. As part of that process in the year 2003 it developed a curriculum for community paralegal workers. The curriculum has been very useful in ensuring that all organizations involved in paralegal training cover an agreed set of issues in the process of training and that the eventual trainees are of a certain quality. The curriculum however only highlights the areas to be covered. The substance is to be filled during the actual training.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law in the State of North Carolina."
    SECTION .0100 - ORGANIZATION .0101 Definitions For purposes of this Chapter, the following shall apply: (1) "Chapter" or "Rules" refers to the "Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law in the State of North Carolina." (2) "Board" refers to the "Board of Law Examiners of the State of North Carolina." A majority of the members of the Board shall constitute a quorum, and the action of a majority of a quorum, present and voting, shall constitute the action of the Board. (3) "Executive Director" refers to the "Executive Director of the Board of Law Examiners of the State of North Carolina." (4) "Filing" or "filed" shall mean received in the office of the Board of Law Examiners. Except that applications placed in the United States mail properly addressed to the Board of Law Examiners and bearing sufficient first class postage and postmarked by the United States Postal Service or date-stamped by any recognized delivery service on or before a deadline date will be considered as having been timely filed if all required fees are included in the mailing. Mailings which are postmarked after a deadline or which, if postmarked on or before a deadline, do not include required fees or which include a check in payment of required fees which is dishonored because of insufficient funds will not be considered as filed. Applications which are not properly signed and notarized; or which do not include the properly executed Authorization and Release forms; or which are illegible; or with incomplete answers to questions will not be considered filed and will be returned.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Task Force to Examine Limited Legal Licensing ______
    ______________ Supreme Court Task Force to Examine Limited Legal Licensing __________________________________ ______________ ______________ Report and Recommendations November 18, 2015 __________________________________ ______________ The mission of the Utah judiciary is to provide the people an open, fair, efficient, and independent system for the advancement of justice under the law. SUPREME COURT TASK FORCE TO EXAMINE LIMITED LEGAL LICENSING (1) Introduction and summary ............................................................. 5 (a) Introduction ................................................................................. 5 (b) Task force charge .......................................................................... 7 (c) Summary of recommendations .................................................... 8 (2) The practice of law in Utah ........................................................ 10 (a) Authority of the supreme court to govern the practice of law ... 10 (b) Supreme court rules .................................................................... 11 (3) Program design principles ......................................................... 14 (4) Practice areas of greatest demand ............................................. 15 (5) Procedural areas of paraprofessional competence .................... 16 (a) How do people get advice about remedies to their “civil justice situations”? ............................................................................................... 16 (b) How do people obtain and prepare forms?
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyers Training Systems in the EU Estonia
    Lawyers training systems in the EU Estonia Information provided by: Estonian Bar Association (Eesti Advokatuur) April, 2014 DESCRIPTION OF THE NATIONAL TRAINING SYSTEM FOR LAWYERS in Estonia 1. Access to the Profession Higher education / university YES education A law degree is compulsory YES Steps to becoming a fully-fledged • Examination /Assessment of candidate by the bar lawyer: or by a committee established by the bar • Evaluation of the candidate and acceptance by a law firm (Attorneys may provide legal services only through a law firm. • Completion of an induction period • Registration with the Bar (after passing the attorney-at-law examination or if one has passed the examination and has practiced as an assistant to an attorney-at-law for at least 3 years) In Estonia attorneys-at-law are fully fledged lawyers. Since the 1st of March 2013 there are 2 types of members of the Bar Association: attorneys-at-law and assistants to the attorney-at-law. Assistants are members of the Estonian Bar Association who can practice under the supervision of an Attorney- at-law. Attorneys-at-law can be admitted to the Bar Association if: 1 Country: Estonia • they have passed the attorney-at-law examination; • they have passed the examination and are Doctors of Law (PhD holders); • they have been attorneys-at-law and join the Bar Association within 5 years after exclusion from Bar Association (according to the Bar Association Act § 36 par.1 p.1 or 4, an attorney may be excluded from the Bar Association following resolution of the Bar Association if he has submitted an application or if he has not practiced as an attorney for more than 3 consecutive years due to health reasons or other reasons); • they have worked for at least 3 years as judges, notaries or prosecutors may join Bar Association within 5 years after leaving their post (or as supreme judge, judge of the ECJ, of the General Court of the EU, Chancellor of Justice – Oiguskanstler (The Chancellor of Justice in Estonia combines the function of the general body of petition and the guardian of constitutionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Trust Accounting for Alabama Attorneys
    TRUST ACCOUNTING FOR ALABAMA ATTORNEYS Prepared by the Practice Management Assistance Program A member service of the Alabama State Bar ii Preface This work is a general overview designed to answer commonly asked questions. It is not exhaustive and it does not attempt to cover every situation or every question related to attorneys’ trust accounts in Alabama. Originally prepared in 1997, it is based on Trust Accounting for Attorneys in Georgia which was written by Terri Olson during her term as Director of the Law Practice Management Program of the State Bar of Georgia. We are grateful for her help and for the State Bar of Georgia’s permission to create our own handbook based on the design of theirs. Rule 1.15 of the Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, pertaining to safekeeping client property, and selected ethics opinions are included to provide further guidance. If, after reading this material, you still have questions about the propriety of certain actions, please contact the Office of the General Counsel at (334) 269-1515 or (800) 354-6154 (instate only) for a free, confidential, informal opinion. If you have questions regarding the mechanics of trust account setup or bookkeeping, please contact the Practice Management Assistance Program at (334) 269-1515 or (800) 354-6154 (instate only). If you have any questions regarding the Alabama Law Foundation, please contact Tracy Daniel at (334) 387-1600. Questions regarding the Alabama Civil Justice Foundation should be directed to Sue McInnish at (334) 263-3003. Laura A. Calloway, Director Practice Management Assistance Program Revised September 2016 iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS About Trust Accounts .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the President
    October 1, 2015 CALDA update SETTING THE STANDARD…EDUCATION, ETHICS, EXCELLENCE issue or dispute acknowledged by a self- Message from Mandatory MCLE represented (pro per) constituent. As of January 1, 2016, Business & Professions The legal statutes and doctrine referenced in Code §6402.2 will dictate that an LDA shall these presentations are provided in attorney- the President complete 15 hours of continuing legal approved material form for educational & education courses during his or her two-year information purposes. This is done in order period. An LDA attempting to re-register will to train the practitioner in assisting his or her Dear CALDA Members: be required to attest to the fact that this constituent/pro per client with preparing the education has been completed. legal documents necessary to pursue the I am very happy to report that Governor constituent’s case. These resources are MCLE activity must relate to legal subjects. Brown has signed AB 285. The changes meant to be shared with constituent/client in The upcoming conference is designed to made by this bill will now be the law as of their decision-making process when provide legal access education in Family Law, January 1, evaluating their facts to the elements of law Probate, Wills & Trusts, Civil Law, Property & 2016. Thank necessary to form a basis for a legal issue. you to Legal Ethics relevant to Legal Document everyone who Assistants, Paralegals, and members of the helped us to State Bar. make this The conference will also offer classes in how happen. I'd to conduct a business that provides equal like to extend access to justice for all constituents ANNUAL ELECTION an extra demonstrating significant current special thanks For Voting Members NOT professional and practical content.
    [Show full text]