Paralegal Support Network
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Working Document for the Constitution of Kenya Review Commission on the Kadhi's Courts, Chief Kadhi and Kadhis
WORKING DOCUMENT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA REVIEW COMMISSION ON THE KADHI'S COURTS, CHIEF KADHI AND KADHIS By Ahmed Issack Hassan, Commissioner, CKRC. ([email protected]) (www.ahmedissackhassan.com) The Commission’s Mandate The Constitution of Kenya Review Act provides that the objects and purposes of the constitutional review is to secure provisions therein, inter alia respecting ethnic and regional diversity including the right of communities to organize and participate in cultural activities and the expression of their identities and establishing a democratic government that respects human rights - (Section 3(e) & (b). Further, under Section 5(b) of the Act, the organs of the review shall ensure that the review process accommodates the diversity of the Kenyan people including socio-economic status, race, ethnicity, gender, religious faith, age, occupation, learning, persons with disability and the disadvantaged. The Commission is also mandated to seek views on and make recommendation to the judiciary and the legal systems of Kenya. Chapter 5 of the Constitution of Kenya guarantees the protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of every person. Section 78 guarantees the freedom of thought, religion and conscience and Section 82 prohibits discrimination of any person on account of inter alia his or her religious beliefs. The Current Status of the Kadhi’s Courts, Chief Kadhi and Kadhis The Kadhi's Court, Chief Kadhi and Kadhis are Constitutional offices established under Section 66 of the Constitution of Kenya. A Kadhi is strictly speaking a judicial officer, judge or magistrate presiding over an Islamic Court, called the Kadhi's Court, where Islamic law or Sharia is applied and subject to the jurisdiction of the Court all the parties who appear before the Court are those that profess the Muslim/ Islamic faith. -
Kenya Briefing Packet
KENYA PROVIDING COMMUNITY HEALTH TO POPULATIONS MOST IN NEED se P RE-FIELD BRIEFING PACKET KENYA 1151 Eagle Drive, Loveland, CO, 80537 | (970) 635-0110 | [email protected] | www.imrus.org KENYA Country Briefing Packet Contents ABOUT THIS PACKET 3 BACKGROUND 4 EXTENDING YOUR STAY? 5 PUBLIC HEALTH OVERVIEW 7 NATIONAL FLAG 15 COUNTRY OVERVIEW 15 OVERVIEW 16 BRIEF HISTORY OF KENYA 17 GEOGRAPHY, CLIMATE AND WEATHER 19 DEMOGRAPHICS 21 ECONOMY 26 EDUCATION 27 RELIGION 29 POVERTY 30 CULTURE 31 USEFUL SWAHILI PHRASES 36 SAFETY 39 CURRENCY 40 IMR RECOMMENDATIONS ON PERSONAL FUNDS 42 TIME IN KENYA 42 EMBASSY INFORMATION 43 WEBSITES 43 !2 1151 Eagle Drive, Loveland, CO, 80537 | (970) 635-0110 | [email protected] | www.imrus.org KENYA Country Briefing Packet ABOUT THIS PACKET This packet has been created to serve as a resource for the KENYA Medical/Dental Team. This packet is information about the country and can be read at your leisure or on the airplane. The first section of this booklet is specific to the areas we will be working near (however, not the actual clinic locations) and contains information you may want to know before the trip. The contents herein are not for distributional purposes and are intended for the use of the team and their families. Sources of the information all come from public record and documentation. You may access any of the information and more updates directly from the World Wide Web and other public sources. !3 1151 Eagle Drive, Loveland, CO, 80537 | (970) 635-0110 | [email protected] | www.imrus.org KENYA Country Briefing Packet BACKGROUND Kenya, located in East Africa, spans more than 224,000 sq. -
Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania of 1977
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA OF 1977 CHAPTER 2 OF THE LAWS ________ 2005 The following is the official Revised version in English of “KATIBA YA JAMHURI YA MUUNGANO WA TANZANIA YA MWAKA 1977”. This revised edition of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania incorporates and consolidates all amendments made therein by the Constituent Assembly in 1977 up to the 14 th Amendment of 2005 and it is printed and published under section 4 of the Laws Revision Act Chapter 4. 2 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (CAP. 2) ARRANGEMENT OF CONTENTS Article Title PREAMBLE CHAPTER ONE THE UNITED REPUBLIC, POLITICAL PARTIES, THE PEOPLE AND THE POLICY OF SOCIALISM AND SELF RELIANCE PART I THE UNITED REPUBLIC AND THE PEOPLE 1. Proclamation of the United Republic. 2. The territory of the United Republic. 3. Declaration of Multi-Party State. 4. Exercise of State Authority of the United Republic. 5. The Franchise. PART II FUNDAMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY 6. Interpretation. 7. Application of the provisions of Part II. 8. The Government and the People. 9. The pursuit of Ujamaa and Self-Reliance. 10. [Repealed]. 11. Right to work, to educational and other pursuits. PART III BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES The Right to Equality 12. Equality of human beings. 13. Equality before the law. The Right to Life 14. The right to life. 15. Right to personal freedom. 16. Right to privacy and personal security. 17. Right to freedom of movement. 3 The Right to Freedom of Conscience 18. -
Labor and Employment Law Paralegal
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW PARALEGAL 2007 Revision and update drafted by Kimberly Browning, Holland & Hart, LLP. 2007 review by Brian Mumaugh, Esq., of Holland & Hart, LLP. Originally drafted by Kathy Sercel and David Steadmon. Originally reviewed by Daniel Satriana, Jr., Esq., of Hall & Evans, LLC and Glenn D. Chadwick, Esq., of Beattie & Chadwick. ALL OF THE BELOW DUTIES ARE ASSUMED TO, AND MUST BE, UNDER THE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED ATTORNEY. Labor and Employment is a unique area of law that encompasses many different specialties and sub-specialties. A paralegal must have extensive knowledge of the state and federal rules of civil procedures, along with knowing the practice procedures of the various federal, state and other related governmental agencies, in order to assist a Labor and Employment lawyer. The following material provides a general guideline of a paralegal’s duties within the context of this specialty. A. EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION 1. ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act): a. Conduct the initial review of the employees claim file. b. Create detailed claim file summaries. c. Assist attorney during settlement, mediation, arbitration and trial. d. Draft settlement agreements. 2. EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) and CCRD (Colorado Civil Rights Division): a. Investigate discrimination claims under federal or state statutes. b. Assist attorney during trial, arbitration, grievance hearings, and other formal proceedings for grievance and/or discharge. c. Assist employers with drafting of proposed policies and procedures which comply with related state, federal, local or agency employment practice regulations. 3. National Relations Labor Board (NLRB)/Union Activity: a. Assist employers with personnel policies and practices to avoid unionization. -
Handout Book Template.Pub
2019 Masters-In-Equity Bench Bar 19-41 Friday, October 11, 2019 presented by The South Carolina Bar Continuing Legal Education Division http://www.scbar.org/CLE SC Supreme Court Commission on CLE Course No. 196251 2019 Masters-In-Equity Bench Bar DATE This program qualifies for 6.0 MCLE, 1.0 LEPR, 1.0 SA/MH, 2.0 BKY SC Supreme Commission on CLE Course # 196251 8:30 a.m. Registration 8:55 a.m. Welcome and Opening Remarks Hon. Joseph K. Coffey Coffey & McKenzie, PA 9:00 a.m. Emotional Intelligence for Lawyers and Judges Henry L. Deneen Murphy & Grantland, PA 10:00 a.m. The ABA and Cybersecurity Ethics for Lawyers Jamie Khan McCullough Khan, LLC Richard J. Krenmayer Stasmayer Inc. 11:00 a.m. Break 11:15 a.m. Equity Principles Stephen A. Spitz Stevens & Lee 12:15 p.m. Lunch (on your own) 1:30 p.m. Resistible Force Meets Immovable Object: How Your Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Fare on Appeal Hon. George “Buck” James, Jr. S.C. Supreme Court 2:30 p.m. Break 2:45 p.m. Pinckney Act W.T. Geddings, Jr. Geddings Law Firm 3:45 p.m. Orders of Reference and Surplus Funds and Bankruptcy, Oh My! Reginald P. Corley Scott & Corley, PA Hon. John E. Waites U.S. Bankruptcy Court 4:45 p.m. Adjourn Masters‐In‐Equity Bench Bar SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES (by order of presentation) Hon. Joseph K. Coffey Coffey & McKenzie, PA Manning, SC (course planner) Judge Coffey received his Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from The Citadel in 1992, and his J.D. -
Bungoma County Council Hall)
Seattle University School of Law Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation I. Core TJRC Related Documents Commission of Kenya 7-9-2011 Public Hearing Transcripts - Western - Bungoma - RTJRC09.07 (Bungoma County Council Hall) Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core Recommended Citation Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission, "Public Hearing Transcripts - Western - Bungoma - RTJRC09.07 (Bungoma County Council Hall)" (2011). I. Core TJRC Related Documents. 133. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core/133 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission of Kenya at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in I. Core TJRC Related Documents by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORAL SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION HELD ON SATURDAY, 9 TH JULY, 2011 AT BUNGOMA COUNTY COUNCIL HALL PRESENT Gertrude Chawatama - The Presiding Chair, Zambia Berhanu Dinka - Commissioner, Ethiopia Ahmed Sheikh Farah - Commissioner, Kenya (The Commission commenced at 10.00 a.m.) (The Presiding Chair (Commissioner Chawatama) introduced herself and the other TJRC Commissioners) (Opening Prayers) The Presiding Chair (Commissioner Chawatama): Please, be seated. On behalf of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC), I welcome you to our sittings on the second day here in Bungoma. The TJRC thanks you for the warm welcome. It was an honor and privilege to have heard witnesses yesterday who touched on various violations which included torture, murder, wrongful or unfair dismissal and the issue of land. -
Why Do You Want to Be a Paralegal? By: Rachel G
Why do you want to be a Paralegal? By: Rachel G. Roberson I want to be a paralegal because this profession allows you to make a difference in the lives of others while impacting the world in a meaningful way. A paralegal will often interact with people, businesses, organizations and the community and can shape how others view and are affected by the law. Paralegals are front-line advocates for their clients and their skills allow them to work in various roles that serve the greater good. The greatest impact a paralegal can make is to improve the wealth of knowledge that others have of the legal community and how it affects others. As a paralegal I plan to continue to make an impact on the non-profit organizations at which I am currently employed by. I currently work as a Legal Assistant for two Non-Profit, Rural Electric Cooperatives that are member-owned. Non-profit rural electric cooperatives are fundamental within our communities because they promote the seven (7) Cooperative Principles which are: (1) Concern for community; (2) Democratic Member Control; (3) Member economic participation; (4) Voluntary and open membership; (5) Autonomy and independence; (6) Education, training and information, and; (7) Cooperation among Cooperatives. Not only do these Cooperatives provide electric utilities to underserved rural communities but they give back to their members by providing educational opportunities, electric initiatives and economic benefits to their local communities. Non-profits serve an important role in linking communities and organizations to the assets they need by providing opportunities they otherwise would not be capable of reaching. -
LEGL - Legal Studies LEGL - Legal Studies
LEGL - Legal Studies LEGL - Legal Studies Global Citizenship Program facilities. Students will also study United States Constitutional Knowledge Areas (....) Amendments that deal with criminal law, as well as statutory laws involving crimes against persons and property. Prerequisite: ARTS Arts Appreciation LEGL 2400 or POLT 2400. GLBL Global Understanding LEGL 4460 Methods of Legal Research and Writing I (3) PNW Physical & Natural World A primary purpose of this course is to focus on the practical QL Quantitative Literacy skills and ethical decisions required of practicing paralegals. This course focuses on familiarizing the student with legal ROC Roots of Cultures reference materials by locating, analyzing, and summarizing state SSHB Social Systems & Human statutes, local ordinances, court opinions, and administrative Behavior rules. Students learn the essential skills of legal researching and legal and logical reasoning, and begin to develop legal writing skills. This course enables the student to apply the theory of legal Global Citizenship Program research and writing to practical problems encountered in the Skill Areas (....) legal environment. Prerequisites: Junior standing or permission of the department chair and LEGL 2400 or POLT 2400. CRI Critical Thinking ETH Ethical Reasoning LEGL 4470 Methods of Legal Research and Writing II (3) INTC Intercultural Competence As this course is designed to train paralegals with the theoretical Course Descriptions OCOM Oral Communication and practical skills necessary to be a successful paralegal in the legal environment, this course continues to develop the WCOM Written Communication knowledge and skills learned in LEGL 4460 Legal Research and Writing I. Students will focus on finding, analyzing, and ** Course fulfills two skill areas summarizing federal statutes, court opinions and administrative rules. -
Governance Assessment Kenya 2016.Pdf
GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT KENYA: JANUARY 2013 – JULY 2016 Kenya: Governance Assessment GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT Kenya: January 2013 – July 2016 Roland Ebole and Morris Odhiambo1 1 Introduction This report focuses on politically significant developments in Kenya from 2013, when the country held its first general elections under the 2010 constitution. The constitution is considered to have markedly enhanced protection of basic rights, significantly constrained executive power, and provides limited devolution of powers across 47 newly created county governments.2 In 2013, Kenya held its first general election under the 2010 constitution. Kenyans cast their votes for president, national and county-level representatives, female representatives to the National Assembly, and governors. With 50.5% of the vote, Uhuru Kenyatta of the National Alliance (TNA), backed by the Jubilee Alliance, won the presidency. His opponent, Raila Odinga of the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), backed by the Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (CORD), was second with 43.7%. The election of governors and local assemblies strengthened the position of county governments. Female representatives to the National Assembly were elected in all 47 counties3 while 16 more were nominated to the Senate.4 Following the vote, CORD and a civil society organization (CSO) challenged the outcome of the presidential election at the Supreme Court,5 which had only 14 days to consider their petition under the constitution.6 Moreover, the pay scale for members of parliament set by the Salaries and Remuneration Commission was rejected by legislators, forcing the SRC to approve higher salaries.7 Implementation of the constitution and additional reforms continued, including the vetting of police officers by the National Police Service Commission (NPSC) and scrutiny of judges and magistrates by the Judges and Magistrates Vetting Board (JMVB). -
Integrating Gender Norms in Economic Empowerment Projects
Tanzania Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 18 No. 2, 2020: 42 - 69 Integrating Gender Norms in Economic Empowerment Projects Jacqueline Halima Mgumia1 Abstract This article employs a critical gender empowerment framework to unpack the bearing of discriminatory gender norms on economic empowerment developmental projects that target young women. Informed by feminist theory, it shows how, being embedded in institutions, which carry particular social relations, cultural values, and power differentials, gendered norms around marriage, femininity/masculinity, and division of labour prevent young women from fully engaging in the projects. By drawing from ethnographic observation of two such projects in Mwanza and Dar es Salaam regions in Tanzania, the article also shows how gender norms can be enablers in achieving gender equality. As such, it argues that, for these projects to achieve their objectives of empowering young women to foster equitable development, they must integrate the critical gender empowerment framework in their overall design, implementation, and evaluation. Key words: Gender, Economic Empowerment, Development, Interventions, Young Women, Norms and Division of Labour Introduction The most prominent features of economies around the world, particularly in Africa, are gender inequalities in terms of income and division of labour as well as gender differences in property ownership, access to employment, and remunerations (Asongu, Nnanna, & Acha-Anyi, 2020; Asongu & Odhiambo, 2020; Azuh, Amodu, Azuh, Oresanya, & Matthew, 2017; -
Paralegal Training Report, 12Th- 15Th November 2013
Paralegal Training Report, 12th- 15th November 2013 Since the inception of the National Agency for Legal Aid (NALA) in 2010, it has made tremendous efforts in delivery of legal aid services to the most indigent persons in The Gambia. However, financial and human resources constraints coupled with lack of interest by Gambian Lawyers to provide pro bono legal services have immensely affected implementation of legal aid in the country. To bridge this gap, NALA through the support of UNDP, collaborated with the University of The Gambia’s Law Faculty to launch a Paralegal System. 35 students in their 3rd and 4th year at the Law Faculty and who are members of the Law Clinic at the Faculty were trained on Paralegalism from 12th to 15th November 2013. This idea was to enable students of the Law Faculty volunteer their time to assist in legal aid service delivery as they gain practical experience while handling real cases and working closely with lawyers which would be of great value to them once they graduate from the Faculty. Student Paralegals will support the provision of legal aid in the country by conducting intake assessment both at the Law Clinic facilities and at various community outreach programs organized by NALA throughout the country. Where necessary, student paralegals will be attached to the Magistrates Courts and District Tribunals to assist in legal aid and delivery of justice to the indigent persons appearing before these Courts. This initiative will see lawyers cut down the time spent on cases while at the same time provide law students with invaluable legal training as they learn how to assist the poor and marginalized in having better access to justice. -
The BBI Judgment and the Invention of Kenya
The BBI Judgment and the Invention of Kenya Ambreena Manji 2021-05-22T18:15:05 On 13 May 2021, the Constitutional and Human Rights Division of the High Court of Kenya delivered its judgment in David Ndii and Others vs The Attorney General and Others, widely referred to as the BBI judgment. The judgment has led to a flurry of analysis. All commentators have included in their analyses reflections on how the court was attentive to history, specifically Kenya’s constitutional history since independence in 1963. Indeed, the court found in this history a guide to the people’s intentions in ‘bequeathing themselves’ [para 469, 472, 473] the 2010 Constitution. The court reasoned that although ‘there is no clause in the Constitution that explicitly makes any article in the Constitution un-amendable’: “…the scheme of the Constitution, coupled with its history, structure and nature creates an ineluctable and unmistakable conclusion that the power to amend the Constitution is substantively limited. The structure and history of this Constitution makes it plain that it was the desire of Kenyans to barricade it against destruction by political and other elites… the Kenyan Constitution was one in which Kenyans bequeathed themselves in spite of, and at times, against the Political and other elites. Kenyans, therefore, were keen to ensure that their bequest to themselves would not be abrogated through either incompatible interpretation, technical subterfuge, or by the power of amendment unleashed by stealth.” [para 473] The court’s reliance on history in part explains the excitement the judgment has generated. Commentators have pointed out that the basic structure doctrine elaborated by the court rests on the foundations of Kenyan history.