DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Report WHO GUIDELINES for the HEALTH SECTOR RESPONSE to CHILD MALTREATMENT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Report WHO GUIDELINES for the HEALTH SECTOR RESPONSE to CHILD MALTREATMENT Technical Report WHO GUIDELINES FOR THE HEALTH SECTOR RESPONSE TO CHILD MALTREATMENT Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 2 Acronyms and abbreviations ............................................................................................................... 3 Glossary ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................. 6 Summary of guiding principles ............................................................................................................ 8 Summary of recommendations (R) and good practice statements (GP) ............................................... 8 1. Background .................................................................................................................................. 17 A. The magnitude of child and adolescent maltreatment .................................................................................. 17 B. Health consequences of child and adolescent maltreatment ........................................................................ 18 D. Objectives of and rationale for these guidelines ............................................................................................ 19 E. Target audience .............................................................................................................................................. 20 F. Scope of the guidelines ...................................................................................................................... 20 2. Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 22 A.Guideline contributors .................................................................................................................................... 22 B.Declaration of interests by external contributors ........................................................................................... 22 C.Identification of priority research questions and outcomes – scoping exercise.............................................. 23 D.Evidence retrieval ............................................................................................................................................ 23 E.Quality assessment, synthesis and grading of the evidence ............................................................................ 24 F.Formulation of recommendations ................................................................................................................... 25 G.Document preparation and peer-review ........................................................................................................ 26 3. Guiding principles derived from ethical principles and human rights standards ........................ 26 A. The principle of best interests of the child or adolescent .............................................................................. 26 B. The principle of evolving capacities of the child or adolescent ...................................................................... 27 C. The principle of non-discrimination ................................................................................................................ 28 D. The principle of participation ......................................................................................................................... 28 4. Recommendations and good practice statements ......................................................................... 29 A. INITIAL IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................................................................. 29 B. MEDICAL HISTORY, PHYSICAL EXAMINATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF FINDINGS .................................... 39 C. SAFETY AND RISK ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................................... 44 D. INTERACTING WITH CAREGIVERS ................................................................................................................... 46 E. PSYCHOLOGICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH INTERVENTIONS .............................................................................. 48 F. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES AND HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS FOR REPORTING CHILD OR ADOLESCENT MALTREATMENT................................................................................................................................................. 58 G. TREATMENT OF PERPETRATORS .................................................................................................................... 61 H.FACILITATING UPTAKE OF SERVICES................................................................................................................ 63 I. CREATING A SUPPORTIVE AND ENABLING SERVICE-DELIVERY ENVIRONMENT FOR HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS ............................................................................................................................................................................ 65 6. Research implications ................................................................................................................... 66 A.Initial identification ......................................................................................................................................... 66 B. Medical history, physical examination and documentation of findings ......................................................... 67 C. Safety and risk assessment ............................................................................................................................. 67 D. Interacting with caregivers ............................................................................................................................. 67 E. Psychological and mental health interventions .............................................................................................. 67 F. Ethical principles and human rights standards for reporting child or adolescent ........................................... 68 G. Treatment of perpetrators ............................................................................................................................. 68 H.Implementation considerations ...................................................................................................................... 68 7. Dissemination, implementation, monitoring and evaluation .......................................................... 69 Updating the guidelines .................................................................................................................... 70 Annexes ........................................................................................................................................... 71 Annex 1. Guideline contributors ......................................................................................................................... 71 Annex 2: Implications of the strength of the recommendation ......................................................................... 78 Annex 3: International and regional human rights treaties and consensus documents containing safeguards that are relevant for child and adolescent maltreatment .................................................................................. 79 Annex 4. List of supplementary materials in Web Annexes ................................................................................ 80 References ....................................................................................................................................... 82 Acknowledgements The Department for the Management of Noncommunicable Diseases Violence and Injury Prevention (NVI) at the World Health Organization (WHO) has produced this guideline document, under the leadership of Berit Kieselbach (responsible technical officer). The WHO Steering Group (Avni Amin, Alexander Butchart, Etienne Krug, Christopher Mikton, Claudia Garcia-Moreno,, Megin Reijnders, David Ross, Chiara Servili, Marcus Stahlhofer, Mark van Ommeren) gratefully acknowledges the contributions of all the Guideline Development Group (GDG) members: Mona Alkhawari, Maha Almuneef, Jane Barlow, Howard Dubowitz, Asvini Fernando, Jenifer Goldman Fraser, Omer Khan, Alison Kemp, Harriet MacMillan (Co- Chair), Bernadette Madrid (Co-Chair), Mary Joseph Marret, Ben Mathews, Joan van Niekerk, Joseph Rjumba, Rajeev Seth. Alexander Butchart coordinates the work of the violence prevention team. Christopher Mikton was the responsible technical officer at the start of the guideline development process. We also acknowledge the guidance of Cicely Marston as the GRADE Methodologist. NVI also thanks the following external contributors who peer-reviewed the guideline: Edward Chan, Sibnath Deb, Ilsa Dede, Lina Digolo, Martin Finkel, Kevin Lalor, Yanghee Lee, Marija Markovic, Noemí Pereda Beltran, Irene Petit, Josefina Luna Rodriguez, Dinesh Sethi and Hanna Vseviov. A special thanks to the systematic review teams: Jill McTavish (Lead) and Christine McKee (Identification, Psychosocial Interventions, Recurrence) and Elena Broaddus (Lead), Allison Ruark, Kerry Scott, Binita Adhikari and Osama Ummer (qualitative reviews for the good practices related
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Media Activism and Egyptians' Use of Social Media to Combat
    Health Promotion International, Vol. 29 No. S1 # The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. doi:10.1093/heapro/dau046 For Permissions, please email: [email protected] Social media activism and Egyptians’ use of social media to combat sexual violence: an HiAP case study SHEILA PEUCHAUD* Journalism and Mass Communication, American University in Cairo, New Cairo, Egypt *Corresponding author. E-mail [email protected] Downloaded from SUMMARY This paper represents a case study of how social media acti- counsel and social media outlets. The hope is the initiatives vists have harnessed the power of Facebook, Twitter and described in this paper could inspire public health minis- http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/ mobile phone networks to address sexual harassment in tries and activist NGOs to incorporate crowdsourcing Egypt. HarassMap plots reports of sexual harassment on a social media applications in the spirit of health in all pol- Google Map and informs victims of support services. icies (HiAP). To that end, this paper will begin by defining Tahrir Bodyguard and Operation Anti-Sexual Harassment social media activism from the perspective of the communi- (OpAntiSH) protect female protestors who have been vul- cations discipline. This paper will then demonstrate the sig- nerable to sexual aggression at the hands of unruly mobs nificance of sexual harassment as a public health issue, and and by agents of the state. Activists have access to an describe several social media efforts to document incidents Android app called ‘I’m Getting Arrested’ or ‘Byt2ebed and protect victims. The paper will conclude with discus- 3alia’ in Egyptian Arabic.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt CEDAW HRW Submission Aa AE Js Bve+Rb
    Human Rights Watch Submission to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Review of the Arab Republic of Egypt’s periodic report for the 79th Pre-Session October 2020 We write in advance of the 79th pre-session of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women and its review of the Arab Republic of Egypt’s compliance with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. 1. Violence Against Women and Girls (Arts. 1, 2, 3, and 12) Women and girls face violence at extremely high rates in public and private spaces. Though Egyptian authorities have introduced a few legal reforms to combat sexual and gender-based violence, including by increasing penalties for the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) and introducing amendments to protect the identities of survivors, serious gaps remain and further legal and other reforms are needed. In March, during its third Universal Periodic Review at the UN Human Rights Council, Egypt rejected recommendations by several states to end arrests and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Egypt responded that it “does not recognize the terms mentioned in this recommendation.”1 Female Genital Mutilation Female genital mutilation (FGM) remains routinely practiced in Egypt despite the fact that it was criminalized in 2008 and more stringent penalties for its practice were approved by parliament in 2016.2 The 2016 penal code amendments stipulate prison terms of five to seven years for those who carry out FGM, and up to 15 years if the case results in permanent disability or death.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginity Testing: a Systematic Review Rose Mckeon Olson1 and Claudia García-Moreno2*
    Olson and García-Moreno Reproductive Health (2017) 14:61 DOI 10.1186/s12978-017-0319-0 REVIEW Open Access Virginity testing: a systematic review Rose McKeon Olson1 and Claudia García-Moreno2* Abstract Background: So-called virginity testing, also referred to as hymen, two-finger, or per vaginal examination, is the inspection of the female genitalia to assess if the examinee has had or has been habituated to sexual intercourse. This paper is the first systematic review of available evidence on the medical utility of virginity testing by hymen examination and its potential impacts on the examinee. Methods: Ten electronic databases and other sources for articles published in English were systematically searched from database inception until January 2017. Studies reporting on the medical utility or impact on the examinee of virginity testing were included. Evidence was summarized and assessed via a predesigned data abstraction form. Meta-analysis was not possible. Main Results: Seventeen of 1269 identified studies were included. Summary measures could not be computed due to study heterogeneity. Included studies found that hymen examination does not accurately or reliably predict virginity status. In addition, included studies reported that virginity testing could cause physical, psychological, and social harms to the examinee. Conclusions: Despite the lack of evidence of medical utility and the potential harms, health professionals in multiple settings continue to practice virginity testing, including when assessing for sexual assault. Health professionals must be better informed and medical and other textbooks updated to reflect current medical knowledge. Countries should review their policies and move towards a banning of virginity testing. Keywords: Virginity, Virginity testing, Hymen, Female, Gynecological examination Plain Language Summary had sexual intercourse, and that it can hurt the person Language: English being tested – physically, mentally, and socially.
    [Show full text]
  • Applicants' Submissions on Merits
    27 February 2014 Communication 424/12 In the matter between: SAMIRA IBRAHIM MAHMOUD, RASHA ALI ABDEL-RAHMAN (Represented by EIPR, INTERIGHTS and REDRESS) v. EGYPT APPLICANTS’ SUBMISSIONS ON MERITS Dr. Mary Maboreke Executive Secretary, African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights Kairaba Avenue P.O. Box 673 Banjul, The Gambia Fax: +220 4392 962 By email: [email protected] 1 LEGAL REPRESENTATION1 The Applicants are both represented by: (1) Bahaa Ezzelarab Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights 6 Dar El Shefaa Street, Ground Floor Garden City Cairo, Egypt Tel/fax: +202 279 333 71 / 72 / 73 Email: [email protected] [email protected] (2) Susie Talbot and Vesselina Vandova INTERIGHTS New Loom House 101 Back Church Lane London E1 1LU United Kingdom Tel: + 44 (0)20 7264 3989 Fax: + 44 (0)20 7481 9911 Email: [email protected] [email protected] (3) Jürgen Schurr REDRESS 87 Vauxhall Walk London SE11 5HJ 1 The Applicants’ legal representatives would like to acknowledge the valuable research assistance provided by the Avon Global Center for Women and Justice of the Cornell Law School. The Center’s research on international and regional standards, case law and commentary relating to articles 2 and 18(3) of the African Charter was of immense help. 2 Tel: +44 (0)20 7793 1777 Fax: +44 (0)20 7793 1719 Email: [email protected] 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Introduction……………………………………………………………………..…9 B. Summary of Facts…………………………………………………………………9 (1) The First Applicant…………………………………………………………….10 (2) The Second Applicant……………………………………………………….…13 (3) Response by members of the Supreme Council of Armed Forces…………..…15 (4) Case before the military court…………………………………………………16 (5) Case before the Court of Administrative Justice………………………………17 C.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Stigmatized Virginity in Contemporary Sexual Culture
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Spring 2017 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Spring 2017 I’d Rather Be a Slut: An Analysis of Stigmatized Virginity in Contemporary Sexual Culture Aja Renee Corliss Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2017 Part of the Gender and Sexuality Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Corliss, Aja Renee, "I’d Rather Be a Slut: An Analysis of Stigmatized Virginity in Contemporary Sexual Culture" (2017). Senior Projects Spring 2017. 397. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2017/397 This Open Access work is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been provided to you by Bard College's Stevenson Library with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this work in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I’d Rather Be a Slut: An Analysis of Stigmatized Virginity in Contemporary Sexual Culture Senior Project Submitted to The Division of Social Studies of Bard College by Aja Corliss Annandale-on-Hudson, New York May 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS To my participants, thank you for your vulnerability, your honesty, and your realness. Thank you for trusting me and giving me your time. You’ve taught me so much.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginity Testing: Recommendations for Primary Care Physicians in Europe and North America
    Practice BMJ Glob Health: first published as 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002057 on 20 January 2020. Downloaded from Virginity testing: recommendations for primary care physicians in Europe and North America 1,2 1 3 4 Sondra S Crosby , Nicolette Oleng, Muriel M Volpellier, Ranit Mishori To cite: Crosby SS, Oleng N, ABSTRACT Summary box Volpellier MM, et al. Virginity Virginity testing is a complex, culturally mediated practice testing: recommendations that is poorly understood by Western clinicians. While ► An examination of the hymen cannot accurate- for primary care physicians advocating for global elimination of the practice of virginity in Europe and North ly or reliably tell you whether a woman has had testing as a human rights violation, clinical practice is America. BMJ Global Health intercourse. often more complicated and ethically nuanced, and the 2020;5:e002057. doi:10.1136/ ► ”Virginity testing” is a complex, culturally mediat- clinician must act in the best interest of her patient. bmjgh-2019-002057 ed practice that is poorly understood by Western Upholding human rights does not have to be incompatible clinicians. with providing a needed service to a patient, which should Handling editor Seye Abimbola ► While advocating for global elimination of the prac- never include an invasive exam if not medically necessary, tice of “virginity testing” as a human rights violation, Received 7 October 2019 but should include education and safety assessments. clinical practice is often more complicated and ethi- Revised 24 November 2019 cally nuanced, and the clinician must act in the best Accepted 30 November 2019 interest of her patient. ► Refusal of care may be counterproductive, and a missed opportunity for education about the lack of INTRODUCTION science behind ‘virginity testing’, and about female "Virginity” testing refers to the practice of anatomy and sexuality.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginity Tests and Their Implications on Law and Development
    American University in Cairo AUC Knowledge Fountain Papers, Posters, and Presentations 2011 Virginity tests and their implications on law and development Farida Kalagy Follow this and additional works at: https://fount.aucegypt.edu/studenttxt Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kalagy, Farida, "Virginity tests and their implications on law and development" (2011). Papers, Posters, and Presentations. 23. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/studenttxt/23 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by AUC Knowledge Fountain. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers, Posters, and Presentations by an authorized administrator of AUC Knowledge Fountain. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ElKalagy 1 Name: Farida Kalagy ID: 900070906 Major: Political Science Course: POLS 477 (Law and Development) Instructor: Usha Natarajan E-Mail: [email protected] Telephone: 0105018824 Virginity Tests and their Implications on Law and Development On 9th March, Egyptian military officers in their operation to clear Tahrir Square, arrested at least 18 women and subjected them to virginity tests. Amnesty international, an international organization that primarily focuses on Human rights violations as described in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other human rights standards, issued a report condemning this inhumane act. The procedure, which will be discussed below, was described as a violation of human rights within international law. The incident was also condemned by all human rights and women’s rights organizations in Egypt and was perceived as a serious setback on the road towards democracy and freedom in the new era that was initiated by the January 25th revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginity Testing Evidence-Based Guiding Note
    Virginity Testing Evidence-Based Guiding Note What is Virginity Testing? ‘Virginity testing’ is the inspection of the female genitalia to assess if the examinee has had or has been habituated to sexual intercourse. ‘Virginity testing’ is a practice some communities use to detect which women or girls are ‘virgins’ (i.e. have not had sexual intercourse). Some medical practitioners use ‘virginity testing’ as part of the sexual assault assessment of female rape survivors. The two most common techniques used for ‘virginity testing’ are the visual inspection of the hymen for size or tears and the two-finger vaginal insertion. In the latter, the aim is to measure the size of the introitus or the laxity of the vaginal wall and the presence of the hymen, which is a thin membrane in the vaginal opening that some communities believe remains intact until women have sexual intercourse. However, evidence has shown that this type of testing does not produce accurate results, since presence and features of the hymen differ from woman to woman and the membrane can be ruptured or stretched during daily activities, other than sexual intercourse. What are the consequences of Medical Relevance: is ‘Virginity ‘Virginity Testing’? Testing’ a Determinant for ‘Virginity testing’ causes physical, physiological and Vaginal Intercourse? social harm. According to a 2014 WHO publication, the invasive Physical harm: ‘Virginity tests’ may result in and degrading “virginity test” or the “two-finger test” physical harm to women and girls being examined, - still used in some countries to “prove” whether a including by aggravating existing injuries, in case woman or girl is a virgin - has “no scientific validity”.1 of survivors of violence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Virginity Test in India: Stigma on Society
    A Virginity Test in India: Stigma on Society Madhuri Tulshiram Gangurde ABSTRACT In India women having a very respectful status like goddesses but this is the sad reality that on the other side women have been subjected to cruelty, violence, and discrimination by our society. One of the most humiliating forms of violence is the virginity test. A virginity test is a physical examination for finding ruptures in a woman’s hymen and then determining whether the woman is still ‘a virgin’ or not. Virginity is used as a parameter for assessing her character. The paper focuses on the social and legal aspects regarding the virginity test practice in India conducted by different communities and medical experts. The paper highlights the steps taken by various social actions, constitutional remedies, and judicial pronouncements to uphold the dignity of women against the virginity test practices. INTRODUCTION Today’s highly developed and progressive era equality among all is the foundation of every civilized society. But till the date presence of customs like virginity test and two-finger test is the stigma on society. A virginity test is an old custom in India. A virginity test is a process of determining the virginity of a girl. A virginity test is for the confirmation that she has never engaged in a sexual relationship or never been subjected to sexual intercourse before her Marriage. The virginity test is considered as the purity of a girl and relates to her character as well. The test typically involves a check for the presence of, hymen in female gentiles and bleeding during her first sexual intercourse.
    [Show full text]
  • English, Arabic, Turkish and Somali and Aimed to Break the Taboo Surrounding Violence Against Women and to Inform Women About Their Rights and Options.370
    VAW-for printer-1-14-07.ps - 9/26/2007 10:55 AM Ending violence against women From words to action Study of the Secretary-General UNITED NATIONS VAW-for printer-1-14-07.ps - 9/26/2007 10:55 AM NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion what- soever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations con- cerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The term “country” as used in the text of this publication also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. This publication has been issued without formal editing. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.06.IV.8 ISBN-10: 92-1-112703-3 ISBN-13: 978-92-1-112703-4 Copyright © United Nations, 2006 All rights reserved VAW-for printer-1-14-07.ps - 9/26/2007 10:55 AM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iolence against women is a form of discrimination and a Vviolation of human rights. It causes untold misery, cutting short lives and leaving countless women living in pain and fear in every country in the world. It harms families across the generations, impoverishes com- munities and reinforces other forms of violence throughout societies. Violence against women stops them from fulfilling their potential, restricts economic growth and undermines development. The scope and extent of violence against women are a reflection of the degree and persistence of discrimination that women continue to face.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginity Testing in Turkey: a Violation of Women’S Human Rights Chanté Lasco American University Washington College of Law
    Human Rights Brief Volume 9 | Issue 3 Article 3 2002 Virginity Testing in Turkey: A Violation of Women’s Human Rights Chanté Lasco American University Washington College of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, and the Women Commons Recommended Citation Lasco, Chanté. "Virginity Testing in Turkey: A Violation of Women’s Human Rights." Human Rights Brief 9, no. 3 (2002): 10-13. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Rights Brief by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lasco: Virginity Testing in Turkey: A Violation of Women’s Human Rights Virginity Testing in Turkey: A Violation of Women’s Human Rights by Chanté Lasco* n February 2002, Turkey issued a decree and it is likely that a Turkish woman would banning forced virginity testing. This fol- rather undergo virginity testing than risk Ilowed an announcement in July 2001 by her reputation. Turkey’s Health Minister, Osman Durmus, The extent of the practice is difficult to that midwife and nursing students were estimate because most women are very reluc- required to be virgins, and that testing would Credit: Shara Abraham tant to admit their virginity has been ques- be used to ensure compliance. Although tioned and thus seldom report being sub- human rights groups and the international jected to testing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virginity Test
    University of Washington Tacoma UW Tacoma Digital Commons Gender & Sexuality Studies Student Work Collection School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences Fall 11-30-2019 The Virginity Test Navjoat Kaur [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/gender_studies Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Kaur, Navjoat, "The Virginity Test" (2019). Gender & Sexuality Studies Student Work Collection. 44. https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/gender_studies/44 This Undergraduate Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at UW Tacoma Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gender & Sexuality Studies Student Work Collection by an authorized administrator of UW Tacoma Digital Commons. R U A K THE T A O J V VIRGINITY A N Y B TEST AKA the "two-finger" test Who does the testing? WHAT EVEN IS THE It usually depends on the region, but medical officials , community leaders, members of law enforcement, trusted older women and even parents are VIRGINITY TEST? often are given the authority to perform this two-finger test to check whether the woman still has had vaginal intercourse or not, and that is used to assess their purity and honor. Why does this test happen? Women and even young girls have to go through this if their parents or other family members request this testing. Potential life partners and their families are also given the right to ask for this test. Even potential employers, especially military officials, have the authority to ask their female employees to prove their virginity through this test.
    [Show full text]