DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—House H7867

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record—House H7867 September 30, 2004 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H7867 clear, there will be much increased po- to expel him from Kuwait, but also Clinton administration for using U.S. troops tential for damage, and the rising sea when the President made the decision in what he called ‘‘nation-building.’’ levels will create more flooding from that we had achieved our objectives ‘‘I’m worried about an opponent who uses nation-building and the military in the same the storm surges. and we were not going to get bogged sentence,’’ he told a rally. ‘‘My view of the It is time for the United States to down in the problems of trying to take military is for our military to be properly work with other developed countries to over and govern Iraq.’’ prepared to fight and win wars—therefore, recognize the threat of global climate I am entering Mr. Connelly’s column (to) prevent war from happening in the first warming, to cooperate on solutions to in the RECORD. It is seattlepi.com. place.’’ reduce greenhouse gases. Future gen- Read it. What are we doing in Iraq if not ‘‘nation- erations will be grateful. Mr. Speaker, they may call it swag- building?’’ Enmeshed in Iraq, are we properly prepared to fight such crazies as the nuclear f ger in Texas, but we call it truth in weapon-equipped ‘‘Great Leader’’ of North Washington State. MARRIAGE PROTECTION Korea, Kim Jong II? Our Real Enemy: Two days after 9/11, AMENDMENT [From the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Sept. 29, 2004] President Bush declared: ‘‘The most impor- tant thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. (Mr. PITTS asked and was given per- IN THE NORTHWEST: BUSH-CHENEY FLIP-FLOPS It is our No. 1 priority, and we will not rest mission to address the House for 1 COST AMERICA IN BLOOD minute and to revise and extend his re- until we find him.’’ (By Joel Connelly) Six months later, laying political ground- marks.) As George W. Bush has lately shown, the work for the Iraq war, the President said: ‘‘I Mr. PITTS. Mr. Speaker, today we tactic of successfully defining your opponent don’t know where he is. I have no idea and I will debate and vote on an issue of crit- is to political conflict what occupying the really don’t care. It’s not that important. ical importance to our society: mar- high ground is to waging war. It’s not our priority.’’ riage. The Bush-Cheney campaign has gleefully The 9/11 Commission: The White House ini- The issue is whether we will stand labeled John Kerry a flip-flopper. But what tially opposed creation of an independent idly by as a few unelected judges rede- of Bush-Cheney flip-flops? They’re getting a commission to investigate causes of the 9/11 atrocities. A July 2002 statement read: ‘‘The fine the family for us, or if we will take lot less ink, but America is paying a price in blood. administration would oppose an amendment a stand and say enough is enough. The Little noticed, and worthy of lengthy con- that would create a new commission to con- best home for kids is with their mom sideration, is a speech delivered by then-De- duct a similar review (to Congress’ investiga- and dad. Children cannot do better fense Secretary Dick Cheney in 1992 to the tion).’’ than that, and we should not try to re- Discovery Institute in Seattle. The administration reversed course five define marriage. The words of our future vice president—de- months later. The bipartisan commission, in- cluding former Sen. Slade Gorton, R–WA, Unfortunately, some claim that this fending the decision to end Gulf War I with- out occupying Iraq—eerily foretell today’s distinguished itself at hearings and in its is an issue for the States. Indeed, it is findings and recommendations. if that is what was happening. It is not. morass. Here is what Cheney said in ’92: ‘‘I would guess if we had gone in there, I Homeland Security: In the fall of 2001 Sens. OHN MCCAIN, R–AZ, and JOE LIEBERMAN, D– Activist courts are circumventing the would still have forces in Baghdad today. J CT, proposed creating a Cabinet-level De- States in order to make this happen. We’d be running the country. We would not We would never debate it. The States partment of Homeland Security. have been able to get everybody out and White House press secretary Ari Fleischer would never debate it. The American bring everybody home. outlined the administration’s opposition in people would never debate. That is how ‘‘And the final point that I think needs to October 2001, saying Congress did not need to the activist groups and the activist be made is this question of casaualties. I make the director’s job ‘‘a statutory post’’ judges want it. States rights are mean- don’t think you could have done all of that and that ‘‘every agency of the government ingless if judges ultimately make the without significant additional U.S. casual- has security concerns.’’ ties. And while everybody was tremendously A year later, the Bush administration was decisions. impressed with the low cost of the (1991) con- Mr. Speaker, this House should pass flaying Sen. MAX CLELAND, D–GA—a Viet- flict, for the 146 Americans who were killed nam triple amputee—for allegedly being an the marriage protection amendment in action and for their families, it wasn’t a obstacle to creation of the department. Anti- and send it to the State legislatures for cheap war. Cleland ads showing Osama bin Laden and their ratification so the courts do not ‘‘And the question in my mind is how Saddam Hussein flashed across the TV become the final maker of family pol- many additional American casualties is Sad- screens of Georgia. icy. Kids do best with a mom and dad. dam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is not Such are this administration’s major na- that damned many. So, I think we got it tional security flip-flops. But other flips bear f right, both when we decided to expel him on our safety. CHENEY HAD IT RIGHT FIRST from Kuwait, but also when the president During the 2000 campaign, candidate Bush TIME made the decision that we’d achieved our ob- pledged to limit carbon dioxide emissions jectives and we were not going to get bogged into the atmosphere. It didn’t happen. The (Mr. MCDERMOTT asked and was down in the problems of trying to take over President promised to support—or at least given permission to address the House and govern Iraq.’’ sign—renewal of Congress’ 1994 ban on mili- for 1 minute and to revise and extend How—given what he said then—does Che- tary-style assault weapons. The Bush admin- his remarks and include extraneous ney get off challenging the judgment and istration didn’t lift a finger to extend the material.) strength of those who argue that we are ban, which recently expired. bogged down and shedding blood today? Out here on America’s ‘‘Left Coast,’’ can- Mr. MCDERMOTT. Mr. Speaker, the Is Sadddam worth the lives of 1,046 (at last didate George Bush proclaimed himself a Vice President had it right on Iraq the count) dead Americans, and 7,000 injured steadfast free trader. Even today, Republican first time, and now we know that be- Americans? State Chairman Chris Vance hammers Kerry cause of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer Dick Cheney posed the hard-nosed ques- as a flip-flopper on trade. newspaper columnist Joe Connelly. tions that should be asked by a president in How, then, to explain the President’s 2002 The Vice President was Defense Sec- time of war. George Bush is out on the cam- decision to slap tariffs of 8 to 30 percent on steel imports to the United States? (The tar- retary during the first Gulf War. Mr. paign trail boasting he’s hard-nosed because he didn’t ask how a ‘‘Mission Accomplished!’’ iffs were lifted after 21 months.) CHENEY told a Seattle audience in 1992 Answer: The steel-producing states of could unravel. that it was folly to spill American Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia have Kerry is taking a pounding from the re- 46 fought-over electoral votes in this year’s blood to try to get Saddam or try to lentless Republican machine. A GOP TV ad election. govern Iraq. This column ought to be shows Kerry windsurfing, with Strauss’ required reading before the Presi- ‘‘Blue Danube’’ waltz playing in the back- f dential debates. ground, as the voice-over claims the nominee b 1015 These are DICK CHENEY’s exact words has shifted positions ‘‘whichever way the in defending the first President Bush’s wind blows.’’ HISTORIC MEETING BETWEEN decision to leave Iraq and Saddam Hus- In case the ‘‘mainstream’’ media are inter- INDIA AND PAKISTAN LEADERS sein: ‘‘And the question in my mind is ested, or Fox News wants to balance its re- OFFERS HOPE porting to furnish a few moments of fairness, how many additional American casual- here are a few Bush flip-flops that might be (Mr. WILSON of South Carolina ties is Saddam worth? And the answer put before the voters: asked and was given permission to ad- is not that damned many. So I think Nation-Building: As a candidate, Dubya dress the House for 1 minute and to re- we got it right, both when we decided traveled the land in 2000 denouncing the vise and extend his remarks.) VerDate Aug 04 2004 03:04 Oct 01, 2004 Jkt 029060 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K30SE7.005 H30PT1 H7868 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE September 30, 2004 Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ford Broadcasts, 1967-1968” of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box D37, folder “Ford Broadcasts, 1967-1968” of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. The Council donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. ~ REPUBliCAN GONGRES.SIONAl NEWS BUREAU 312 CONGRESSIONAL HOTEL • WASHINGTON, D. C. 20003 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE LINCOLN 4-301 0 Monday, F\!bruary 27, 1967 Acting on the heels of a House Special Committee racommcndation of censure and other penaltbs for Rep. Adem Clayton Powell (D. of N.Y.), some 30 freshmen House Re- publicans today proposed legislation to set up permanent House machinery to deal with unethical conduct of tvbmbers, officers and employees. Led by Rep. George Bush of Taxes, the R,3publican Congressmen sponsored Hous3 Resolutions to establish o Select Committee on Standards and Conduct and to provide, among other things, 11 full disclosura of assets, liabilities, honorariums, etc., by Members, their spouses and staff members whose salaries exceed $15,000 gross annually ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Bush Revolution: the Remaking of America's Foreign Policy
    The Bush Revolution: The Remaking of America’s Foreign Policy Ivo H. Daalder and James M. Lindsay The Brookings Institution April 2003 George W. Bush campaigned for the presidency on the promise of a “humble” foreign policy that would avoid his predecessor’s mistake in “overcommitting our military around the world.”1 During his first seven months as president he focused his attention primarily on domestic affairs. That all changed over the succeeding twenty months. The United States waged wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. U.S. troops went to Georgia, the Philippines, and Yemen to help those governments defeat terrorist groups operating on their soil. Rather than cheering American humility, people and governments around the world denounced American arrogance. Critics complained that the motto of the United States had become oderint dum metuant—Let them hate as long as they fear. September 11 explains why foreign policy became the consuming passion of Bush’s presidency. Once commercial jetliners plowed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it is unimaginable that foreign policy wouldn’t have become the overriding priority of any American president. Still, the terrorist attacks by themselves don’t explain why Bush chose to respond as he did. Few Americans and even fewer foreigners thought in the fall of 2001 that attacks organized by Islamic extremists seeking to restore the caliphate would culminate in a war to overthrow the secular tyrant Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Yet the path from the smoking ruins in New York City and Northern Virginia to the battle of Baghdad was not the case of a White House cynically manipulating a historic catastrophe to carry out a pre-planned agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Iowa Before the Iowa Utilities Board in Re: ) Itc Midwest Llc ) Docket No. E-22386 Dairyland Power Cooperative ) ______
    Filed with the Iowa Utilities Board on February 17, 2020, E-22386 STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD IN RE: ) ITC MIDWEST LLC ) DOCKET NO. E-22386 DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE ) ________________________________________________________________________ Reply Brief of Linda E. Grice in Opposition to the Cardinal Hickory Creek Project I. Introduction The CEI Intervenors, a group of well-funded lobbyists wants to silence the voices of citizen and ratepayer intervenors in the CHC Project because they do not feel their voices are relevant or credible. They say citizen intervenors lack basis. The Iowa Office of Consumer Advocate is afraid that when the truth gets out concerning how, poorly they defend the rights of Iowa Citizens that Iowans will become discouraged and not contact their office for help. The Applicants and the CEI say that wind energy is cheap yet can’t put a number on its’ cost. CEI opines on the fact that MS Grice objects to what she claims is Iowa’s transformation from an agricultural state into an “industrial energy generation complex” without citizen input. (Grice Pre-Hearing Brief at 3.) CEI states Ms. Grice ignored established state law that helped facilitate this. The argument in this brief will address these issues and provide documentation to support the conclusions. Linda Grice Reply Brief 1 Filed with the Iowa Utilities Board on February 17, 2020, E-22386 II. Argument The CEI wants to eliminate citizen and ratepayer voices so their argument cannot be refuted. In the Dubuque hearing of the CHC Transmission line four citizen intervenors stood alone against large sums being spent to silence them.
    [Show full text]
  • Smugglers Or Samaritans in Tucson, Arizona: Producing and Contesting Legal Truth
    smugglers or samaritans in Tucson, Arizona: producing and contesting legal truth SUSAN BIBLER COUTIN-North Adams State College In 1991, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeals of a nun, a minister, two priests, and four lay people convicted of conspiring to harbor, transport, and conceal the unlawful entry of undocumented Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants. The court's decision removed this conflict between the U.S. government and members of the U.S. sanctuary movement (a grassroots network of congregations that had declared themselves sanctuaries for undocu- mented Central American refugees)1 from the last forum of truth in the formal legal system. The designation of convicted sanctuary workers as alien-smugglers had officially been made permanent. Despite the seeming decisiveness of this outcome, however, the very acts that constituted these sanctuary workers as criminals enabled defendants to promote competing assessments of their actions. Before they were indicted, the threat of criminal charges led sanctuary workers to develop complex legal, moral, and religious justifications for their work with Central Americans. The 1985-86 trial gave defendants the opportunity to bring these justifications before a wide audience. Following the trial, convicted sanctuary workers and their colleagues used their increased knowledge of surveillance and law to leave a record that they felt would define their actions as law-abiding rather than criminal. Paradoxically, prosecution and surveillance simultaneously criminalized and exonerated sanctuary workers. The legal conflict between the sanctuary movement and the U.S. government sheds light on how particulartechnologies of power, such as surveillance and prosecution, facilitate resistance even as they repress.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Anti-Muslim Mobilization in a Rural Great Plains
    “The Real Issue Is…”: A Case Study of Anti-Muslim Mobilization in a Rural Great Plains Community Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sarah R. Walton, B.A. Graduate Program in Environment and Natural Resources The Ohio State University 2018 Thesis Committee Professor Cathy Rakowski, Advisor Professor Jill Clark Professor Linda Lobao Copyrighted by Sarah R. Walton 2018 1 Abstract Recent studies by the Southern Poverty Law Center have noted a rise in organized anti-Muslim activism over the last three years. A number of these organized, violent mobilizations have occurred in nonmetropolitan areas. This is partially due to the fact that meatpacking facilities are increasingly located in small cities or rural areas in the Midwest or Great Plains and recruit Muslim African immigrant and refugee workers. This has resulted in a secondary migration of Muslims, particularly Somalis, to smaller meatpacking communities in the Midwest or Great Plains, creating new contexts for ethnic conflict. To date, rural hate groups, specifically these emergent anti-Muslim mobilizations, are not well understood. I seek to determine the justifications and mobilization strategies used in these anti-Muslim mobilizations. I undertake a case study of an anti-Muslim hate group in a small Great Plains community. My core research questions are: 1) How does this group justify their anti-Muslim activism?; and 2) What elements of the group's rhetoric seem to resonate with the local community? I utilize a social movements perspective to analyze transcripts from the hate group's public meetings, a public town hall meeting with a local refugee resettlement agency, and the content of the hate group's public Facebook page (454 group posts; 1,370 individual comments).
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth (With Jokes) Advertisement by Al Franken
    The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20131017003209/http://www.indigocafe.com/columns/article.php?c=64 Member List | Your Shopping Bag | Your Account Welcome, Guest! (sign in) *** WE ARE CLOSED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATRONAGE. *** Become an Affiliate Suggest A Book Gift Certificates Jenn's Blog: A Bookseller's Tale Frequent Buyer Card About us Help Book Review The Truth (with Jokes) Advertisement by Al Franken Reviewer: Geoff Wisner, Staff Reviewer Posted: November 22, 2005 You don't really expect a book called The Truth to be as entertaining as Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them. It's natural to expect more self- righteousness and less humor. In the end, The Truth is not as funny as Al Franken's last book — but it's still damn funny, and it cuts deeper. Unlike Greg Palast, Mark Crispin Miller, and other critics on the left, Al Franken doesn't believe that George Bush stole the 2004 election from John Kerry. (He does believe that Bush stole the 2000 election — and writes that since Bush has only been elected once he could legally run again in 2008!) Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them by Al Franken That's not to say that Franken thinks the 2004 election was clean. He offers an easy-to-remember phrase to summarize how Bush won: fear, smear, and queers. Fear was the fear of terrorist attack that Bush and Cheney did so much to whip up through alarmist speeches and strategically timed color-coded alerts. (Funny how we haven't been to code orange since the election — except for those of us here in New York, which is on a permanent orange alert.) Smear was largely about the well-promoted lies of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, aimed at making a war hero look like more of a wimp than the guy who couldn't be bothered to show up for his Air National Guard duty.
    [Show full text]
  • JANUARY 6, 2005 No
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRSTSESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JANUARY 6, 2005 No. 2 House of Representatives The House met at 11 a.m. and was So we will pray and act now and for- Mrs. Emerson; Ms. Granger; Mr. Peterson of called to order by the Speaker pro tem- ever. Amen. Pennsylvania; Mr. Goode; Mr. Doolittle; Mr. pore (Mr. SIMPSON). LaHood; Mr. Sweeney; Mr. Sherwood; Mr. f Weldon of Florida; Mr. Simpson; Mr. f THE JOURNAL Culberson; Mr. Kirk; Mr. Crenshaw; Mr. DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER Rehberg; Mr. Carter; and Mr. Alexander. PRO TEMPORE The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Hunter, Chair has examined the Journal of the Chairman. The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- last day’s proceedings and announces fore the House the following commu- Committee on Budget: Mr. Nussle, Chair- to the House his approval thereof. man. nication from the Speaker: Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- WASHINGTON, DC, Committee on Education and the Work- January 6, 2005. nal stands approved. force: Mr. Boehner, Chairman. I hereby appoint the Honorable MICHAEL K. f Committee on Energy and Commerce: Mr. SIMPSON to act as Speaker pro tempore on Barton, Chairman; Mr. Hall; Mr. Bilirakis; this day. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mr. Upton; Mr. Stearns; Mr. Gillmor; Mr. J. DENNIS HASTERT, The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the Deal; Mr. Whitfield; Mrs. Cubin; Mr. Speaker of the House of Representatives. gentleman from South Carolina (Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • George W. Bush: Policy, Politics, and Personality James P
    4157Long_Edwards_ch09p161-181 10/24/03 1:57 PM Page 161 CHAPTER 9 George W. Bush: Policy, Politics, and Personality NNN James P. Pfiffner The School of Public Policy George Mason University During his time in office, President George W. Bush demonstrated impressive lead- ership skills.1 He was able to overcome the lack of a mandate in the 2000 election and convince Congress to pass a large tax cut. He continued to press his policy agenda when the terrorist attacks of 9-11 transformed his presidency and reoriented its focus. The war on terrorism in Afghanistan was prosecuted effectively, with the Taliban being overthrown and Al Qaeda driven out of the country. The broader success of the war was mixed, however; as of the summer of 2003 Osama Bin Laden was not captured, the terrorist threat of Al Qaeda was not eliminated, and Afghan- istan remained unstable. In an impressive display of political leadership in 2002 President Bush was able to overcome the skepticism of the professional military in the United States, the op- position of much of the world, and the lack of support from the UN Security Council and take the United States to war with Iraq in order to depose Saddam Hussein. The war ended within three weeks, though the attempt to install a legitimate successor government was to take much longer. Over this period, President Bush has exhibited several patterns of behavior that provide some insight into his policy choices. He has shown a preference for moral certainty over strategic calculation; a tendency for vis- ceral reaction rather than reflection; a preference for clarity rather than complexity; a bias toward action rather than deliberation; and a preference for the personal over the structural or procedural.2 Bush exuded confidence and moral certainty and ex- hibited no evidence of self doubt or ambivalence about major decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Secret Heart of America”
    43 “The Secret Heart of America” Lyndon Baines Johnson’s Bold Synthesis of American Thought Daniel T. Carrigg and James A. Morone Rarely . does an issue lay bare the secret heart of America itself. Rarely are we met with a challenge . to the values and the purposes and the meaning of our beloved nation. The is- sue of equal rights for American Negroes is such an issue. And should we defeat every enemy, and should we double our wealth and conquer the stars, and still be unequal to this issue, then we will have failed as a people and as a nation.1 November 26, 1963, was raw and wet in Washington, D.C. Just four days earlier an assassin’s bullet had thrust Lyndon Baines Johnson (1908–1973) into the presidency. Now, he sat with advisors in the dining room of his sprawling ten-bedroom estate in northwest Washington and pondered just what he aimed to achieve. The next day, he would address a joint session of Congress and a national television audience—a kind of inaugural address. His advisors agreed on one thing: Stay clear of civil rights. Bringing it up would offend the Southern Democrats and, besides, John F. Kennedy’s Civil Rights Bill was a lost cause.2 President Johnson (LBJ) had other ideas. He was already famous for coming on like a tidal wave, as Vice President Hubert Humphrey later put it, and now he interrupted the talk of trimming in his booming Texas way: “Well, what the hell’s the presidency for?”3 From those first days, LBJ decided to make the explosive matters of race and civil rights central to his domestic policy agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Credibility Determinations at the Illinois Torture Inquiry and Relief Commission
    CHANBONPIN.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 4/30/2014 9:37 AM Truth Stories: Credibility Determinations at the Illinois Torture Inquiry and Relief Commission Kim D. Chanbonpin* This is the first scholarly Article to investigate the inner workings of the Illinois Torture Inquiry and Relief Commission (“TIRC”). The TIRC was established by statute in 2009 to provide legal redress for victims of police torture. Prisoners who claim that their convictions were based on confessions coerced by police torture can utilize the procedures available at the TIRC to obtain judicial review of their cases. For those who have exhausted all appeals and post-conviction remedies, the TIRC represents the tantalizing promise of justice long denied. To be eligible for relief, however, the claimant must first meet the TIRC’s strict four-element test for credibility. This Article argues that through its over-reliance on these credibility standards, the TIRC effectively inscribes and reproduces a dominant narrative of police torture, one that promotes a “bad apples” myth and ignores the contributing factors of broader-scale forces such as racism and inadequate police accountability mechanisms. By accepting certain claims of torture as credible and rejecting others, the TIRC engages in the construction of a socio-legal truth about Chicago’s police torture crisis. This Article explores the truth-making function of the TIRC, examining its adjudicatory processes under the framework of what Andrew Woolford and R.S. Ratner call “the informal-formal justice complex.” The TIRC is an informal justice practice in that it provides a forum for the adjudication of police torture claims in a space created outside the formal legal system.
    [Show full text]
  • Face the Nation
    © 2005 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved PLEASE CREDIT ANY QUOTES OR EXCERPTS FROM THIS CBS TELEVISION PROGRAM TO "CBS NEWS' FACE THE NATION. " CBS News FACE THE NATION Sunday, November 13, 2005 GUESTS: Senator JOHN McCAIN, (R-AZ) Governor MARK WARNER, (D-VA) ELISABETH BUMILLER The New York Times MODERATOR: BOB SCHIEFFER - CBS News This is a rush transcript provided for the information and convenience of the press. Accuracy is not guaranteed. In case of doubt, please check with FACE THE NATION - CBS NEWS 202-457-4481 BURRELLE'S INFORMATION SERVICES / 202-419-1859 / 800-456-2877 Face the Nation (CBS News) - Sunday, November 13, 2005 1 BOB SCHIEFFER, host: Today on FACE THE NATION, Senator John McCain and Virginia Governor Mark Warner. This week, Senator McCain, Republican of Arizona, put forth a new plan for winning the war in Iraq, which would require more troops, not fewer. Will it fly? And can he get the Bush administration to agree to bar torture of all terrorist suspects? We'll ask him. Then we'll talk with Virginia's Democratic Governor Mark Warner, whose protege Tim Kaine just won the governorship, is there a lesson here for Democrats and does this increase the possibility that Warner may run for president? Elisabeth Bumiller of The New York Times joins in the questioning, and I'll have a final word on multitasking. But first, Senator McCain on FACE THE NATION. Announcer: FACE THE NATION with CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer. And now from CBS News in Washington, Bob Schieffer. SCHIEFFER: And good morning again.
    [Show full text]
  • The Educational Views of Lyndon Baines Johnson Prior to His Presidency
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1982 The Educational Views of Lyndon Baines Johnson Prior to His Presidency Janet Patricia Fredericks Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Fredericks, Janet Patricia, "The Educational Views of Lyndon Baines Johnson Prior to His Presidency" (1982). Dissertations. 2054. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2054 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1982 Janet Patricia Fredericks THE EDUCATIONAL VIEWS OF LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON PRIOR TO HIS PRESIDENCY by Janet Patricia Fredericks A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 1982 DEDICATED TO MARCEL ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research would never have progres:sed without the assistance and guidance of my major professor, Dr. Gerald L. Gutek, Dean of the School of Education of Loyola University of Chicago, and the other mem­ bers of my committee: Professor John M. Wozniak and Professor Mark Krug. A special thanks go to the late Dr. Rosemary Donatelli who provided help and assistance in the early stages of the dissertation development. Certain libraries have become a second home during the past years.
    [Show full text]