DOCSLIB.ORG

This Table Was Generated on 12/30/20. Amount PAC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Table Was Generated on 12/30/20. Amount PAC This table was generated on 12/30/20. Independent Expenditure Table 1** Independent Expenditure Totals by Committee and Filer Type January 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020 Independent Expenditure (IE) Totals by Committee and Filer Type Amount PAC Independent Expenditures* $49,008,267 Party Independent Expenditures $173,626,039 Independent Expenditure-Only Political Committees (Super PACs) $911,871,082 Political Committees with Non-Contribution Accounts (Hybrid PACs) $182,807,024 Independent Expenditures Reported by Persons other than Political Committees $42,687,876 Total Independent Expenditures (IE) $1,360,000,288 ID # IEs by Political Action Committee (PAC)* Amount C00348540 1199 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INT'L UNION FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION FUND -$10,932 C00739904 21ST CENTURY LEADERSHIP $11,872 C00740845 ACTION TOGETHER PAC $13,579 C00746677 ALABAMA SWAMP DRAINERS PAC $6,391 C00648899 AMERICA'S CONSTITUTION PAC $6,000 C00196246 AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY INC POLITICAL COMMITTEE (OPHTHPAC) $9,468 C00173153 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHETISTS SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (CR $479,320 C00343459 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC $73,528 C00279562 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AFL-CIO PAC $21,253 C00011114 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E $4,019,973 C00520312 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS GUILD, LOCAL 1931 SAN DIEGO AND GROSSMON $3,089 C00106146 AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC $509,685 C00755116 ARTISTS FOR A MORE PEACEFUL AMERICA $5,159 C00564401 ASHEVILLE TEA PAC $138 C00659490 BALDWIN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE $4,526 C00365536 CHC BOLD PAC $1,786,128 C00757393 CITIZENS FOR VOTING EQUITY $16,965 C00295527 CITIZENS UNITED POLITICAL VICTORY FUND $435,500 C00432260 CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC $522,976 C00743146 COMMITTEE TO ELECT ROBERT J. LOVERO $61,683 C00503870 COMMONWEALTH VALUES PAC $98,752 C00002089 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA-COPE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITT $55,708 C00513176 CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC $543,763 C00495010 CONSERVATIVE CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE $5,035 C00524454 CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY FUND $100,000 C00007880 CULAC THE PAC OF CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION $1,775,098 C00032979 D.R.I.V.E. - DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN, INDEPENDENT VOTER EDUCATION (THE PAC OF T $44,331 C00491050 DAVIS DEMOCRATIC CLUB $939 C00419978 DEFEAT BAD LEADERS 2020 $9,833 C00699041 DEFEAT I.O. PAC $472 C00370007 DEMOCRACY FOR AMERICA $28,919 C00407866 DEMOCRATIC ACTION CLUB OF CHICO $2,048 C00407262 DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE FOR ACTION $21,591 C00743138 DEMOCRATIC CITIZENS OF BERWYN $6,352 C00427575 EASTERN WASHINGTON VOTERS $1,058 C00483412 EL DORADO COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE $65 C00607374 ELBERT GUILLORY'S AMERICA $1,546,730 C00094573 ELECT - THE PAC OF THE ALABAMA FARMERS FEDERATION $20,748 This table was generated on 12/30/20. C00426122 EMPOWERING EACH COMMUNITY PAC $14,800 C00573261 END CITIZENS UNITED $10,262,994 C00442897 EQUALITY CINCINNATI POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $18 C00550970 EQUALITY PAC $386,434 C00757500 ERNIE AND DEBBIE $3,680 C00307777 FREEDOM CLUB FEDERAL PAC $29,870 C00401786 FREEDOM'S DEFENSE FUND $31,025 C00694943 FRIENDS OF MIA LOVE PAC $23,192 C00100289 GEORGIA MINING ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,800 C00750927 GOTV PINELLAS $1,166 C00354605 GRASS ROOTS NORTH CAROLINA/FORUM FOR FIREARMS EDUC POL VICTORY FUND $4,403 C00704593 HOLD THE HOUSE PAC $30,522 C00552851 HOUSE FREEDOM FUND $2,520,409 C00740001 HUMANITY FIRST FOR ILLINOIS PAC $93 C00193441 ILLINOIS AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION ACTIVATOR POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT FUND (FE $18,631 C00692020 IMPEACH $9,566 C00003632 INT'L UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS $36,104 C00632562 INTEGRITY FIRST PAC $149,904 C00029447 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS INTERESTED IN REGISTRATION AND E $209,087 C00007542 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WOR $15,000 C00162818 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 98 COMMITTEE ON $690 C00176214 INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND WAREHOUSE UNION -- POLITICAL ACTION FUND $21,336 C00000885 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHE $45,000 C00536540 JOBS, FREEDOM, AND SECURITY PAC $109,788 C00175521 KANSANS FOR LIFE FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $36,537 C00285783 KANSAS FARM BUREAU VOTERS ORG/ELECT FARM BUREAU FRIENDS FUND (KS FARM B $4,293 C00689356 KEEPING AMERICA GREAT PAC $10,000 C00007922 LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA (LIUNA) PAC $270,823 C00747980 LET'S GET COLORADO BACK TO BUSINESS $33,605 C00625079 LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF ARKANSAS $651 C00480822 LIFE ISSUES FAMILY ETHICS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,039 C00663211 MAD DOG PAC $140,908 C00753814 MEME PAC $175 C00300236 MID-ATLANTIC PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE $440 C00129171 MINNESOTA CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR LIFE, INC. FEDERAL PAC $27,338 C00157958 MISSOURI RIGHT TO LIFE FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,924 C00290866 MISSOURI SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (MO SOYPAC) $200 C00586255 MONUMENT STRATEGIES PAC $1,000 C00504233 NAPA COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE $75 C00481200 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS INC PAC $32,010 C00030718 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,589,599 C00101105 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COM $105,000 C00358051 NATIONAL PRO-LIFE ALLIANCE PAC $17,819 C00053553 NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND $3,423,397 C00111278 NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10,113 C00738906 NEVADA CONSERVATIVE 2020 PAC $8,500 C00260331 NEW JERSEY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE FEDERAL PAC $5,780 C00481986 NORTH DAKOTA FARM BUREAU POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $7 C00083857 OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $86 C00691725 OHIO CD-04 WATCH $23,362 This table was generated on 12/30/20. C00382283 OHLONE AREA UNITED DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN $229 C00754481 PART THE RED SEA $53 C00172361 PENNSYLVANIA PRO-LIFE FEDERATION PAC $20,654 C00757047 PENNSYLVANIA VETERANS CONSORTIUM $14,800 C00755579 PINELLAS CITIZENS FOR POSITIVE CHANGE $1,907 C00433318 PLACER COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE $969 C00653030 POLICE ACTION FUND $3,401 C00343137 POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ORTHOPAEDIC SU $40,000 C00023754 POLITICAL ACTION COUNCIL OF EDUCATORS(UNITED TEACHERS-LOS ANGELES) $610 C00202804 PROCHOICE VOTER $7,930 C00440032 PROMOTING OUR REPUBLICAN TEAM PAC $60,000 C00749077 PUBLIC LANDS ACCESS FOR RECREATION PAC $875 C00566059 REMEDY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10,357 C00427849 REPLACEMENTS LTD PAC $11,330 C00296640 REPUBLICAN MAJORITY FUND $32,500 C00753046 REPUBLICAN VOTERS OF TEXAS-PAC $9,326 C00751016 RESTORE OUR REPUBLIC PAC $34,302 C00141572 RIGHT TO LIFE/OREGON PAC $22,933 C00105791 ROCHESTER AREA RIGHT TO LIFE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $150 C00686410 ROSEDALE HUDDLE $610 C00716803 SAN FRANCISCO YOUNG DEMOCRATS $400 C00429456 SANTA BARBARA WOMEN'S POLITICAL COMMITTEE (FED) $918 C00570226 SEAL PAC SUPPORTING ELECTING AMERICAN LEADERS PAC $878,000 C00004036 SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL E $4,209,468 C00448696 SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND $2,737,800 C00135368 SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE $163,970 C00001636 SMART TD PAC $23,000 C00323923 STONEWALL DEMOCRATIC CLUB FED PAC $3,000 C00682815 SUPERFANNYPAC $1,276 C00332296 SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST INC. CANDIDATE FUND $81,882 C00566174 TEA PARTY MAJORITY FUND $114,546 C00688903 TEMECULA VALLEY DEMOCRATS $434 C00635110 TERM LIMITS NOW POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (TLN PAC) $794 C00214981 TEXAS FARM BUREAU AGFUND $112,500 C00348219 TEXAS SHEEP & GOAT RAISERS PAC $500 C00617381 THE COLLECTIVE PAC $25,000 C00756965 THE DEMOCRATIC SENATE ACTION COMMITTEE $599 C00493221 THE GUARDIAN FUND $20,000 C00718502 THE PEOPLE FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL $1,134 C00754242 TSB VICTORY $1,020 C00012476 UA UNION PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS VOTE! PAC (UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYME $3,652,312 C00002840 UAW - V - CAP (UAW VOLUNTARY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM) $53,997 C00747600 UNITED FOR MASSACHUSETTS $3,570,347 C00003590 UNITED STEELWORKERS POLITICAL ACTION FUND $7,219 C00658708 VERITAS TRUTH IS FREEDOM $925 C00284018 VERMONT RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE INC. POLITICAL COMMITTEE $67 C00553560 VIGOP (VIRGIN ISLANDS REPUBLICAN PARTY) $136,906 C00749424 VOTE LOCAL VOTE BLUE $12,785 C00404525 WELLSTONE DEMOCRATIC RENEWAL CLUB - PAC $1,970 C00157537 WEST VIRGINIANS FOR LIFE INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,385 This table was generated on 12/30/20. C00646703 WINNING FOR WOMEN, INC. PAC $8,242 Total IEs by Political Action Committee $49,008,267 ID # IEs by Party Committee Amount C00454751 5TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE $24,588 C00759415 BAY COUNTY DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE $6,525 C00757740 BAY COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY COMMITTEE $20,150 C00000935 DCCC $39,771,452 C00406256 DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF MARIN $279 C00693549 DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF SISKIYOU COUNTY - FEDERAL $4,606 C00212787 DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF HAWAII $9,738 C00625772 DEMOCRATIC WOMEN OF THE SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY $5,874 C00042366 DSCC $37,188,422 C00759670 FRANKLIN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE $14,801 C00005926 ILLINOIS REPUBLICAN PARTY - FEDERAL $264,999 C00006486 INDIANA REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE, INC. $16,839 C00035600 IOWA DEMOCRATIC PARTY $15,144 C00736173 LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA $63 C00300731 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE $3,364 C00179408 MAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY $87,548 C00041160 MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN PARTY $7,930 C00038505
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Protect Children, Not Guns 2019 1 Introduction
    PROTECT CHILDREN NOT GUNS 2019 Mission Statement he Children’s Defense Fund Leave No Child Behind® mission is to ensure every child a T Healthy Start, a Head Start, a Fair Start, a Safe Start and a Moral Start in life and successful passage to adulthood with the help of caring families and communities. For over 40 years, CDF has provided a strong, effective and independent voice for all the children of America who cannot vote, lobby or speak for themselves. We pay particular attention to the needs of poor and minority children and those with disabilities. CDF educates the nation about the needs of children and encourages preventive investments before they get sick, drop out of school, get into trouble or suffer family breakdown. © 2019 Children’s Defense Fund. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................... 2 Overview .............................................................. 5 Select Shootings Involving Children in the Past 12 Months. 7 Child and Teen Gun Deaths ..........................................11 Child and Teen Gun Injuries .........................................19 International Gun Death Comparisons ..............................23 Progress Since Parkland .............................................29 We Can Do Better: We Must Strengthen Laws to Save Lives. .33 Stand Up and Take Action ...........................................39 Appendices .......................................................... 41 Endnotes ............................................................50 Protect Children, Not Guns 2019 1 Introduction On April 20, 1999, Americans witnessed a once unthinkable and now unforgettable tragedy at Columbine High School. We watched in horror as frightened children fled with their hands up, frantic parents tried to reunite with their children, and traumatized survivors told reporters about the violence they witnessed. It was the first time many of us saw these terrifying scenes. But it was far from the last.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
    Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Broadcasts, 1967-1968” of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box D37, folder “Ford Broadcasts, 1967-1968” of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. The Council donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. ~ REPUBliCAN GONGRES.SIONAl NEWS BUREAU 312 CONGRESSIONAL HOTEL • WASHINGTON, D. C. 20003 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE LINCOLN 4-301 0 Monday, F\!bruary 27, 1967 Acting on the heels of a House Special Committee racommcndation of censure and other penaltbs for Rep. Adem Clayton Powell (D. of N.Y.), some 30 freshmen House Re- publicans today proposed legislation to set up permanent House machinery to deal with unethical conduct of tvbmbers, officers and employees. Led by Rep. George Bush of Taxes, the R,3publican Congressmen sponsored Hous3 Resolutions to establish o Select Committee on Standards and Conduct and to provide, among other things, 11 full disclosura of assets, liabilities, honorariums, etc., by Members, their spouses and staff members whose salaries exceed $15,000 gross annually ..
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Background Over the Past Several Years, Gun Violence
    Gun Violence Prevention Background NFTY Mechina 2015 Issue Background Over the past several years, gun violence prevention has once again been at the forefront of North American political discourse, spurred in large part by the movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado, the Navy Yard shooting in Washington, D.C., and the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut, among others. The costs of gun violence in the United States are staggering: Consider these numbers: 8: Each day, eight young Americans under age 19 die from gun violence. 12: The rate of gun deaths among America’s children is 12 times higher than those of the 25 other wealthiest nations combined. 30,000: Over 30,000 Americans die each year from gun violence. $100 Billion: The estimated medical and social cost of gun violence in America, every single year. Nearly 80% of this cost is borne by taxpayers. The vast majority of Americans, even gun owners, support common sense gun safety measures. According to the National Opinion Research Center, 75% of gun owners support mandatory registration of handguns, as does 85% of the general public. 66% of gun owners and 80% of the general public favor mandatory background checks in private handgun sales, such as gun shows. However, some Americans believe that such gun control measures are unnecessary, ineffective, and contrary to the wording and spirit of the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which states, “A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” Groups such as the National Rifle Association (NRA) argue that law-abiding citizens, like hunters and sportsmen, will suffer the most under restrictive gun control laws, while criminals will always be able to access guns no matter what restrictions or gun control measures are enacted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bush Revolution: the Remaking of America's Foreign Policy
    The Bush Revolution: The Remaking of America’s Foreign Policy Ivo H. Daalder and James M. Lindsay The Brookings Institution April 2003 George W. Bush campaigned for the presidency on the promise of a “humble” foreign policy that would avoid his predecessor’s mistake in “overcommitting our military around the world.”1 During his first seven months as president he focused his attention primarily on domestic affairs. That all changed over the succeeding twenty months. The United States waged wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. U.S. troops went to Georgia, the Philippines, and Yemen to help those governments defeat terrorist groups operating on their soil. Rather than cheering American humility, people and governments around the world denounced American arrogance. Critics complained that the motto of the United States had become oderint dum metuant—Let them hate as long as they fear. September 11 explains why foreign policy became the consuming passion of Bush’s presidency. Once commercial jetliners plowed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it is unimaginable that foreign policy wouldn’t have become the overriding priority of any American president. Still, the terrorist attacks by themselves don’t explain why Bush chose to respond as he did. Few Americans and even fewer foreigners thought in the fall of 2001 that attacks organized by Islamic extremists seeking to restore the caliphate would culminate in a war to overthrow the secular tyrant Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Yet the path from the smoking ruins in New York City and Northern Virginia to the battle of Baghdad was not the case of a White House cynically manipulating a historic catastrophe to carry out a pre-planned agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives Adopted
    Garofalo Mack Willmott OFFICIAL JOURNAL Geymann Miguez Woodruff Total - 105 OF THE The Speaker announced that there were 105 members present HOUSE OF and a quorum. REPRESENTATIVES Prayer OF THE Prayer was offered by Speaker Kleckley. STATE OF LOUISIANA Pledge of Allegiance Rep. Ponti led the House in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. THIRTY-SIXTH DAY'S PROCEEDINGS Cory Stewart sang "The Lord's Prayer". Forty-first Regular Session of the Legislature Reading of the Journal Under the Adoption of the On motion of Rep. Hill, the reading of the Journal was Constitution of 1974 dispensed with. On motion of Rep. Hill, the Journal of June 10, 2015, was House of Representatives adopted. State Capitol Petitions, Memorials, and Baton Rouge, Louisiana Communications Thursday, June 11, 2015 The following petitions, memorials, and communications were received and read: The House of Representatives was called to order at 9:00 A.M., by the Honorable Chuck Kleckley, Speaker of the House of Representatives. Conference Committee Appointment The Speaker appointed the following conferees on the part of Morning Hour the House to confer with a like committee from the Senate on the disagreement to House Bill No. 769: Reps. Norton vice Carmody. ROLL CALL The roll being called, the following members answered to their Message from the Senate names: ADOPTION OF PRESENT CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT Mr. Speaker Gisclair Miller June 11, 2015 Abramson Guillory Montoucet Adams Guinn Moreno To the Honorable Speaker and Members of the House of Anders Hall Morris, Jay Representatives: Armes Harris Morris, Jim Arnold Harrison Norton I am directed to inform your honorable body that the Senate has Badon Havard Ortego adopted the report of the Conference Committee on the disagreement Barras Hazel Ourso to Senate Bill No.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Iowa Before the Iowa Utilities Board in Re: ) Itc Midwest Llc ) Docket No. E-22386 Dairyland Power Cooperative ) ______
    Filed with the Iowa Utilities Board on February 17, 2020, E-22386 STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD IN RE: ) ITC MIDWEST LLC ) DOCKET NO. E-22386 DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE ) ________________________________________________________________________ Reply Brief of Linda E. Grice in Opposition to the Cardinal Hickory Creek Project I. Introduction The CEI Intervenors, a group of well-funded lobbyists wants to silence the voices of citizen and ratepayer intervenors in the CHC Project because they do not feel their voices are relevant or credible. They say citizen intervenors lack basis. The Iowa Office of Consumer Advocate is afraid that when the truth gets out concerning how, poorly they defend the rights of Iowa Citizens that Iowans will become discouraged and not contact their office for help. The Applicants and the CEI say that wind energy is cheap yet can’t put a number on its’ cost. CEI opines on the fact that MS Grice objects to what she claims is Iowa’s transformation from an agricultural state into an “industrial energy generation complex” without citizen input. (Grice Pre-Hearing Brief at 3.) CEI states Ms. Grice ignored established state law that helped facilitate this. The argument in this brief will address these issues and provide documentation to support the conclusions. Linda Grice Reply Brief 1 Filed with the Iowa Utilities Board on February 17, 2020, E-22386 II. Argument The CEI wants to eliminate citizen and ratepayer voices so their argument cannot be refuted. In the Dubuque hearing of the CHC Transmission line four citizen intervenors stood alone against large sums being spent to silence them.
    [Show full text]
  • Smugglers Or Samaritans in Tucson, Arizona: Producing and Contesting Legal Truth
    smugglers or samaritans in Tucson, Arizona: producing and contesting legal truth SUSAN BIBLER COUTIN-North Adams State College In 1991, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeals of a nun, a minister, two priests, and four lay people convicted of conspiring to harbor, transport, and conceal the unlawful entry of undocumented Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants. The court's decision removed this conflict between the U.S. government and members of the U.S. sanctuary movement (a grassroots network of congregations that had declared themselves sanctuaries for undocu- mented Central American refugees)1 from the last forum of truth in the formal legal system. The designation of convicted sanctuary workers as alien-smugglers had officially been made permanent. Despite the seeming decisiveness of this outcome, however, the very acts that constituted these sanctuary workers as criminals enabled defendants to promote competing assessments of their actions. Before they were indicted, the threat of criminal charges led sanctuary workers to develop complex legal, moral, and religious justifications for their work with Central Americans. The 1985-86 trial gave defendants the opportunity to bring these justifications before a wide audience. Following the trial, convicted sanctuary workers and their colleagues used their increased knowledge of surveillance and law to leave a record that they felt would define their actions as law-abiding rather than criminal. Paradoxically, prosecution and surveillance simultaneously criminalized and exonerated sanctuary workers. The legal conflict between the sanctuary movement and the U.S. government sheds light on how particulartechnologies of power, such as surveillance and prosecution, facilitate resistance even as they repress.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Political Contributions
    2011 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2011 Lilly Political Contributions 2 Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at both the state and federal levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S. debate over health care and pharmaceutical innovation. As a company that operates in a highly competitive and regulated industry, Lilly must participate in the political process to fulfill its fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders, and its overall responsibilities to its customers and its employees. Corporate Political Contribution Elected officials, no matter what level, have an impact on public policy issues affecting Lilly. We are committed to backing candidates who support public policies that contribute to pharmaceutical innovation and healthy patients. A number of factors are considered when reviewing candidates for support. The following evaluation criteria are used to allocate political contributions: • Has the candidate historically voted or announced positions on issues of importance to Lilly, such as pharmaceutical innovation and health care? • Has the candidate demonstrated leadership on key committees of importance to our business? • Does the candidate demonstrate potential for legislative leadership?
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Anti-Muslim Mobilization in a Rural Great Plains
    “The Real Issue Is…”: A Case Study of Anti-Muslim Mobilization in a Rural Great Plains Community Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sarah R. Walton, B.A. Graduate Program in Environment and Natural Resources The Ohio State University 2018 Thesis Committee Professor Cathy Rakowski, Advisor Professor Jill Clark Professor Linda Lobao Copyrighted by Sarah R. Walton 2018 1 Abstract Recent studies by the Southern Poverty Law Center have noted a rise in organized anti-Muslim activism over the last three years. A number of these organized, violent mobilizations have occurred in nonmetropolitan areas. This is partially due to the fact that meatpacking facilities are increasingly located in small cities or rural areas in the Midwest or Great Plains and recruit Muslim African immigrant and refugee workers. This has resulted in a secondary migration of Muslims, particularly Somalis, to smaller meatpacking communities in the Midwest or Great Plains, creating new contexts for ethnic conflict. To date, rural hate groups, specifically these emergent anti-Muslim mobilizations, are not well understood. I seek to determine the justifications and mobilization strategies used in these anti-Muslim mobilizations. I undertake a case study of an anti-Muslim hate group in a small Great Plains community. My core research questions are: 1) How does this group justify their anti-Muslim activism?; and 2) What elements of the group's rhetoric seem to resonate with the local community? I utilize a social movements perspective to analyze transcripts from the hate group's public meetings, a public town hall meeting with a local refugee resettlement agency, and the content of the hate group's public Facebook page (454 group posts; 1,370 individual comments).
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth (With Jokes) Advertisement by Al Franken
    The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20131017003209/http://www.indigocafe.com/columns/article.php?c=64 Member List | Your Shopping Bag | Your Account Welcome, Guest! (sign in) *** WE ARE CLOSED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATRONAGE. *** Become an Affiliate Suggest A Book Gift Certificates Jenn's Blog: A Bookseller's Tale Frequent Buyer Card About us Help Book Review The Truth (with Jokes) Advertisement by Al Franken Reviewer: Geoff Wisner, Staff Reviewer Posted: November 22, 2005 You don't really expect a book called The Truth to be as entertaining as Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them. It's natural to expect more self- righteousness and less humor. In the end, The Truth is not as funny as Al Franken's last book — but it's still damn funny, and it cuts deeper. Unlike Greg Palast, Mark Crispin Miller, and other critics on the left, Al Franken doesn't believe that George Bush stole the 2004 election from John Kerry. (He does believe that Bush stole the 2000 election — and writes that since Bush has only been elected once he could legally run again in 2008!) Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them by Al Franken That's not to say that Franken thinks the 2004 election was clean. He offers an easy-to-remember phrase to summarize how Bush won: fear, smear, and queers. Fear was the fear of terrorist attack that Bush and Cheney did so much to whip up through alarmist speeches and strategically timed color-coded alerts. (Funny how we haven't been to code orange since the election — except for those of us here in New York, which is on a permanent orange alert.) Smear was largely about the well-promoted lies of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, aimed at making a war hero look like more of a wimp than the guy who couldn't be bothered to show up for his Air National Guard duty.
    [Show full text]
  • Combating U.S. Gun Trafficking to Mexico
    Combating U.S. Gun Trafficking to Mexico A STUDY CONDUCTED FOR THE BRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE BY DEVIKA AGRAWAL THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY SPRING 2019 The author conducted this study as part of the program of professional education at the Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley. This paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the course requirements for the Master of Public Policy degree. The judgements and conclusions are solely those of the author, and are not necessarily endorsed by the Goldman School of Public Policy, by the University of California or by any other agency. 1 Table of Contents PART ONE: UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM .......................................................... 3 GUNS IN MEXICO: QUANTITIES, SOURCES OF ORIGIN, AND FINAL DESTINATIONS ...................... 3 THE CASE FOR U.S. GOVERNMENT ACTION .............................................................................................. 8 DIAGNOSIS OF THE PROBLEM .................................................................................................................... 13 PART TWO: SOLVING THE PROBLEM THROUGH POLICY ......................................... 29 POLICY ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................................................................. 31 ANALYSIS BY CRITERIA .................................................................................................................................. 33 FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]