Significant Dissociation of Brain and Plasma Kinetics with Antipsychotics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Significant Dissociation of Brain and Plasma Kinetics with Antipsychotics Molecular Psychiatry (2002) 7, 317–321 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1359-4184/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/mp ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Significant dissociation of brain and plasma kinetics with antipsychotics J Tauscher1,2,4, C Jones1, G Remington2,3, RB Zipursky2,3 and S Kapur1,2,3 1Schizophrenia-PET Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; 2Schizophrenia and Continuing Care Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; 3Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; 4Department of General Psychiatry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Keywords: antipsychotics; pharmacokinetics; positron withdrawal from oral doses of conventional neurolep- emission tomography; receptor occupancy; dopamine tics,8 and up to 6 months after depot injection of halo- receptors; serotonin receptors; schizophrenia peridol decanoate.9 Current dosing regimens of psychotropic drugs are We measured the time course of drug plasma levels based on plasma kinetic considerations, although it is and brain D2 receptor occupancy in healthy volunteers unclear whether plasma levels faithfully reflect brain after a single dose of 3–4 mg risperidone (n = 4) or kinetics of drugs.1,2 To examine this, we compared the 15 mg olanzapine (n = 4). We used [11C]raclopride as a kinetics of plasma levels of two widely used antipsy- PET-ligand to estimate central D2 receptor occupancy chotics, olanzapine and risperidone, vs the time course in the striatum,1 and [11C]FLB457 for quantification of of their effects in the brain. We used positron emission extra-striatal D blockade in the thalamus.10 Addition- tomography (PET) and [11C]-labeled ligands to quantify 2 ally, we investigated the time course of plasma levels striatal and extra-striatal dopamine-2 (D2), and cortical and striatal D2 occupancy in five stable patients suffer- serotonin-2A (5-HT2A) receptor occupancy in healthy subjects after a single dose, and in patients chronically ing from schizophrenia. These patients had received a − treated for psychosis. We found a significant dis- monotherapy with olanzapine 15–20 mg day 1 (n = 3) sociation of brain and plasma kinetics. Mean plasma or risperidone 3 mg day−1 (n = 2) for at least one month. elimination half-lives of single doses of olanzapine and We scanned them immediately after withdrawal from risperidone were 24.2 and 10.3 h, respectively, whereas their antipsychotic medication, and again after 24 it took on average 75.2 h with olanzapine, and 66.6 h and 48 h. with risperidone to decline to 50% of their peak striatal In the single-dose experiments in healthy volunteers, D receptor occupancy. We found similar discrepancies 2 mean peak olanzapine plasma levels occurred 6 h after between the time course of plasma levels and extra-stri- intake (23 ng ml−1 ± 4 SD). The plasma elimination atal D2 as well as 5-HT2A receptor occupancy. Our results question the current reliance on plasma kinetics half-life time (t1/2) was 24.2 h (95% confidence interval as the main basis for dosing regimens of antipsy- (CI): 21.2–28.1). After 72 h, plasma levels declined on chotics. Studies of brain kinetics may provide a sounder basis for determining dosing schedules of psycho- tropic medications. Molecular Psychiatry (2002) 7, 317–321. DOI: 10.1038/ sj/mp/4001009 Novel antipsychotics are currently used to treat diverse medical conditions such as schizophrenia, mania, depression, and dementia. It is well established that antagonism of D2 receptors is critical for antipsychotic efficacy,3,4 and that at clinical doses antipsychotics 5 block a substantial proportion of D2 receptors in vivo. Positron emission tomography and selective ligands such as [11C]raclopride have provided valuable insights regarding receptor occupancy during treatment with olanzapine and risperidone.6,7 However, in most stud- ies PET scans were obtained only at a single time point Figure 1 Single dose experiments in controls. Time course after medication intake, typically 12 h post-dose. of plasma levels (olanzapine: , grey dashed line; risperidone Hence, little is known about the time course of brain plus 9-OH-risperidone: , grey solid line), and striatal D2 receptor blockade with these atypical antipsychotics. receptor occupancy (olanzapine: , black dashed line; risperi- This is of particular interest as it has been shown that done: , black solid line). All results are normalized to 100% D2 receptor occupancy can persist up to 15 days after of their peak value. Error bars denote one standard deviation. Significant dissociation of brain and plasma kinetics J Tauscher et al 318 average to 4 ng ml−1, corresponding to 19% of the peak with risperidone. In patients under steady state con- plasma level (Figure 1). The active moiety of risperi- ditions, the brain t1/2 at striatal D2 receptors was 88.4 h done, risperidone plus 9-hydroxyrisperidone, peaked (95% CI: 61.1–159.3) for olanzapine and 45.5 h (95% −1 ± on average after 2 h (37 ng ml 14 SD), reached t1/2 CI: 44.8–46.2) for risperidone. after 10.3 h (95% CI: 8.1–14.3) and declined to 5% of The extra-striatal D2 receptor occupancy, as mea- peak levels within 72 h (Figure 1). The observed sured with [11C]FLB457 and PET in the thalamus, plasma kinetics were in close correspondence to pre- closely resembled the time course seen in the striatum. viously reported results obtained in healthy volun- Single doses of olanzapine or risperidone led to com- 11–13 14 teers and patients with schizophrenia. parably high peak D2 occupancy of extra-striatal D2 Both single doses of risperidone and olanzapine led receptors in the thalamus ranging from 72% to 82% to high striatal D2 receptor blockade, with peak occu- and declining to 51–69% after 24 h, and 27–37% after pancy rates at the time of their respective peak plasma 72 h. Table 1 shows a synopsis of plasma levels and D2 levels ranging from 80–88%. Subsequent serial PET receptor occupancy in healthy volunteers and patients. scans revealed sustained D2 receptor occupancy with Each of the healthy volunteers experienced sedation, both drugs in the range of 71–77% after 24 h, 56–60% which was reversible within hours. Additionally, three after 48 h, and 36–42% after 72 h. Brain t1/2 at the stria- of the four subjects receiving risperidone showed mild tal D2 receptor was 75.2 h (95% CI: 67.9–84.4) for a sin- to moderate akathisia, which spontaneously resolved gle dose of olanzapine and 66.6 h (95% CI: 54.0–86.8) in two cases, and had to be treated with 1 mg of lora- for risperidone. These brain receptor t1/2 values of both zepam in one case. None of the patients reported any drugs, observed after only one single dose, are substan- clinically relevant side effects at the time of the PET tially longer than the currently recommended dosing scans. interval of 24 h with both drugs. To examine whether the brain effects of antipsy- In olanzapine-treated patients, plasma-levels peaked chotics follow a similar time course on other neuro- −1 ± at 66 ng ml ( 4 SD), showed a t1/2 of 19.5 h (95% CI: transmitter receptors, and since 5-HT2A receptors have 12.4–45.9), and declined to 16 ng ml−1 (±3 SD) after been implicated in the genesis and treatment of psy- 48 h, corresponding to 25% of the peak plasma level. chosis,15 we additionally examined the time course of After discontinuation of risperidone in patients, 5-HT2A receptor occupancy in two healthy volunteers plasma levels declined with a t1/2 of 13.4 h (95% CI: receiving a single dose of 4 mg risperidone or 15 mg 9.8–20.8) to 16% of their peak values within 48 h olanzapine. Both drugs led to a complete saturation of (Figure 2). 5-HT2A receptors within 6 h. After 48 h risperidone −1 Continuous treatment with 15–20 mg day olanza- still led to a complete blockade of 5-HT2A receptors and pine or 3 mg day−1 risperidone resulted in high striatal olanzapine to 92% occupancy, indicating a persisting D2 receptor blockade ranging from 81% to 88% at the cortical 5-HT2A receptor blockade, despite the fact that time of peak plasma levels. Subsequent serial PET drug plasma levels had declined to less than 10% of scans after discontinuation of the antipsychotic medi- their peak plasma level with both drugs. cation revealed mean striatal D2 occupancy values of In summary, both single doses of olanzapine and ris- 78% with olanzapine and 66% with risperidone after peridone in healthy volunteers and continuous treat- 24 h, and after 48 h 61% with olanzapine and 42% ment in patients led to substantial and prolonged D2 and 5-HT2A receptor occupancy. Plasma drug levels declined significantly faster than brain receptor occu- pancy. The 95% CI of brain and plasma t1/2 were dis- tinctly different and non-overlapping for both atypical antipsychotics in single-dose experiments in controls and under steady-state conditions in patients. Thus, our study convincingly demonstrates a significant dis- sociation of declining drug plasma levels and the time course of brain effects in healthy volunteers and patients, after single doses or continuous treatment with risperidone or olanzapine, and both, in striatal and extra-striatal brain regions. Several factors may account for the significant differ- ence in the time courses of drug plasma levels and brain receptor occupancy. The relation between plasma drug levels and occupancy is non-linear and can be best described by a rectangular hyperbola.1 In Figure 2 Discontinuation experiments in patients.
Recommended publications
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,902,815 Olney Et Al
    USOO5902815A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,902,815 Olney et al. (45) Date of Patent: May 11, 1999 54 USE OF 5HT2A SEROTONIN AGONISTS TO Hougaku, H. et al., “Therapeutic effect of lisuride maleate on PREVENT ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NMDA post-stroke depression” Nippon Ronen Igakkai ZaSShi 31: RECEPTOR HYPOFUNCTION 52-9 (1994) (abstract). Kehne, J.H. et al., “Preclinical Characterization of the Poten 75 Inventors: John W. Olney, Ladue; Nuri B. tial of the Putative Atypical Antipsychotic MDL 100,907 as Farber, University City, both of Mo. a Potent 5-HT2A Antagonist with a Favorable CNS Saftey Profile.” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental 73 Assignee: Washington University, St. Louis, Mo. Therapuetics 277: 968–981 (1996). Maurel-Remy, S. et al., “Blockade of phencyclidine-induced 21 Appl. No.: 08/709,222 hyperlocomotion by clozapine and MDL 100,907 in rats reflects antagonism of 5-HT2A receptors' European Jour 22 Filed: Sep. 3, 1996 nal of Pharmacology 280: R9–R11 (1995). 51) Int. Cl. ........................ A61K 31/445; A61K 31/54; Olney, J.W., et al., “NMDAantagonist neurotoxicity: Mecha A61K 31/135 nism and prevention,” Science 254: 1515–1518 (1991). 52 U.S. Cl. .......................... 514/285; 514/315; 514/318; Olney, J.W., et al., “Glutamate receptor dysfunction and 514/646 schizophrenia.” Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 52:998-1007 (1995). 58 Field of Search ............................. 514/285; 314/315, Pulvirenti, L. et al., “Dopamine receptor agonists, partial 314/318, 646 agonists and psychostimulant addiction' Trends Pharmacol Sci 15: 374-9 (1994). 56) References Cited Robles, R.G. et al., “Natriuretic Effects of Dopamine Agonist Drugs in Models of Reduced Renal Mass” Journal of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fushi-Tarazu During Segmentation
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 92, pp. 5441-5445, June 1995 Developmental Biology Drosophila 5-HT2 serotonin receptor: Coexpression with fushi-tarazu during segmentation (in situ hybridization/G protein-coupled receptors/pair-rule gene) JEAN-FRAN;OIS CoLAs*, JEAN-MARIE LAUNAYt, ODILE KELLERMANNt, PHILIPPE ROSAY*, AND Luc MAROTEAUX*§ *Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Mol6culaire et Cellulaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, Universite de Strasbourg, BP 163, 67404 Illkirch Cedex, France; tH6pital Lariboisiere, Service de Biochimie, 2 rue Ambroise Pare, 75475 Paris Cedex 10, France; and tDepartement de Biologie Moleculaire, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France Communicated by Walter J. Gehring, University ofBasel, Basel, Switzerland, March 6, 1995 (received for review December 5, 1994) ABSTRACT Serotonin, first described as a neurotrans- ergic neurons (6), and to incomplete sclerotization of the mitter in invertebrates, has been investigated mostly for its cuticule (3). functions in the mature central nervous system of higher We report the characterization of a Drosophila serotonin vertebrates. Serotonin receptor diversity has been described receptor that displays a typical 5-HT2 receptor sequence, gene in the mammalian brain and in insects. We report the isolation organization, and pharmacology.5 It is expressed in the central of a cDNA coding for a Drosophila melanogaster serotonin nervous system (CNS) during larval and adult stages. More receptor that displays a sequence, a gene organization, and surprisingly, this receptor is expressed at the blastoderm stage pharmacological properties typical of the mammalian 5-HT2 of embryogenesis in a pattern similar to that of the pair-rule serotonin receptor subtype.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,264,917 B1 Klaveness Et Al
    USOO6264,917B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,264,917 B1 Klaveness et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 24, 2001 (54) TARGETED ULTRASOUND CONTRAST 5,733,572 3/1998 Unger et al.. AGENTS 5,780,010 7/1998 Lanza et al. 5,846,517 12/1998 Unger .................................. 424/9.52 (75) Inventors: Jo Klaveness; Pál Rongved; Dagfinn 5,849,727 12/1998 Porter et al. ......................... 514/156 Lovhaug, all of Oslo (NO) 5,910,300 6/1999 Tournier et al. .................... 424/9.34 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (73) Assignee: Nycomed Imaging AS, Oslo (NO) 2 145 SOS 4/1994 (CA). (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 19 626 530 1/1998 (DE). patent is extended or adjusted under 35 O 727 225 8/1996 (EP). U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. WO91/15244 10/1991 (WO). WO 93/20802 10/1993 (WO). WO 94/07539 4/1994 (WO). (21) Appl. No.: 08/958,993 WO 94/28873 12/1994 (WO). WO 94/28874 12/1994 (WO). (22) Filed: Oct. 28, 1997 WO95/03356 2/1995 (WO). WO95/03357 2/1995 (WO). Related U.S. Application Data WO95/07072 3/1995 (WO). (60) Provisional application No. 60/049.264, filed on Jun. 7, WO95/15118 6/1995 (WO). 1997, provisional application No. 60/049,265, filed on Jun. WO 96/39149 12/1996 (WO). 7, 1997, and provisional application No. 60/049.268, filed WO 96/40277 12/1996 (WO). on Jun. 7, 1997. WO 96/40285 12/1996 (WO). (30) Foreign Application Priority Data WO 96/41647 12/1996 (WO).
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Ligand Efficacy at the Mu- Opioid Receptor Using A
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Measuring ligand efficacy at the mu- opioid receptor using a conformational biosensor Kathryn E Livingston1,2, Jacob P Mahoney1,2, Aashish Manglik3, Roger K Sunahara4, John R Traynor1,2* 1Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, United States; 2Edward F Domino Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States; 3Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States; 4Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, United States Abstract The intrinsic efficacy of orthosteric ligands acting at G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) reflects their ability to stabilize active receptor states (R*) and is a major determinant of their physiological effects. Here, we present a direct way to quantify the efficacy of ligands by measuring the binding of a R*-specific biosensor to purified receptor employing interferometry. As an example, we use the mu-opioid receptor (m-OR), a prototypic class A GPCR, and its active state sensor, nanobody-39 (Nb39). We demonstrate that ligands vary in their ability to recruit Nb39 to m- OR and describe methadone, loperamide, and PZM21 as ligands that support unique R* conformation(s) of m-OR. We further show that positive allosteric modulators of m-OR promote formation of R* in addition to enhancing promotion by orthosteric agonists. Finally, we demonstrate that the technique can be utilized with heterotrimeric G protein. The method is cell- free, signal transduction-independent and is generally applicable to GPCRs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32499.001 *For correspondence: [email protected] Competing interests: The authors declare that no Introduction competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Decrease in Brain Serotonin 2 Receptor Binding In
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Decrease in Brain Serotonin 2 Receptor Binding in Patients With Major Depression Following Desipramine Treatment A Positron Emission Tomography Study With Fluorine-18–Labeled Setoperone Lakshmi N. Yatham, MBBS, FRCPC; Peter F. Liddle, PhD, MBBS; Joelle Dennie, MSc; I-Shin Shiah, MD; Michael J. Adam, PhD; Carol J. Lane, MSc; Raymond W. Lam, MD; Thomas J. Ruth, PhD Background: The neuroreceptor changes involved in Results: Eight of the 10 patients responded to desipra- therapeutic efficacy of various antidepressants remain un- mine treatment as indicated by more than 50% decrease clear. Preclinical studies have shown that long-term ad- in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores. Depressed ministration of various antidepressants causes down- patients showed a significant decrease in 5-HT2 recep- regulation of brain serotonin 2 (5-HT2) receptors in rodents, tor binding as measured by setoperone binding in fron- but it is unknown if similar changes occur following anti- tal, temporal, parietal, and occipital cortical regions fol- depressant treatment in depressed patients. Our purpose, lowing desipramine treatment. The decrease in 5-HT2 therefore, was to assess the effects of treatment with desi- receptor binding was observed bilaterally and was par- pramine hydrochloride on brain 5-HT2 receptors in de- ticularly prominent in frontal cortex. pressed patients using positron emission tomography (PET) and fluorine-18 (18F)–labeled setoperone. Conclusions: Depressed patients showed a significant reduction in available 5-HT2 receptors in the brain fol- Methods: Eleven patients who met DSM-IV criteria for lowing desipramine treatment, but it is unknown if this major depression as determined by a structured clinical change in 5-HT2 receptors is due to clinical improve- interview for DSM-III-R diagnosis and suitable for treat- ment or an effect of desipramine that is unrelated to clini- ment with desipramine were recruited.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Influence of Tracer Kinetics
    Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on July 10, 2019 as DOI: 10.1124/mol.119.116764 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. MOL # 116764 Investigating the influence of tracer kinetics on competition-kinetic association binding assays; identifying the optimal conditions for assessing the kinetics of low affinity compounds. David A Sykes1,2, Palash Jain1,2 & Steven J Charlton1,2,3 1School of Life Sciences, Queen’s Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK Downloaded from 2Centre of Membrane and Protein and Receptors (COMPARE), University of Birmingham and University of Nottingham, Midlands, UK. 3 Excellerate Bioscience Ltd, Discovery Building, BioCity, Pennyfoot Street, molpharm.aspetjournals.org Nottingham, NG1 1GF, UK at ASPET Journals on October 1, 2021 1 Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on July 10, 2019 as DOI: 10.1124/mol.119.116764 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. MOL # 116764 Running title: Optimizing the design of competition association assays. Addresses for correspondence: Prof Steven Charlton School of Life Sciences Queen's Medical Centre University of Nottingham Nottingham NG7 2UH Downloaded from E-mail: [email protected] molpharm.aspetjournals.org David Sykes School of Life Sciences Queen's Medical Centre University of Nottingham at ASPET Journals on October 1, 2021 Nottingham NG7 2UH E-mail: [email protected] 2 Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on July 10, 2019 as DOI: 10.1124/mol.119.116764 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Binding Data UNIT 7.5 Harvey J
    Analyzing Binding Data UNIT 7.5 Harvey J. Motulsky1 and Richard R. Neubig2 1GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California 2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ABSTRACT Measuring the rate and extent of radioligand binding provides information on the number of binding sites, and their afÞnity and accessibility of these binding sites for various drugs. This unit explains how to design and analyze such experiments. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci. 52:7.5.1-7.5.65. C 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Keywords: binding r radioligand r radioligand binding r Scatchard plot r r r r r r receptor binding competitive binding curve IC50 Kd Bmax nonlinear regression r curve Þtting r ßuorescence INTRODUCTION A radioligand is a radioactively labeled drug that can associate with a receptor, trans- porter, enzyme, or any protein of interest. The term ligand derives from the Latin word ligo, which means to bind or tie. Measuring the rate and extent of binding provides information on the number, afÞnity, and accessibility of these binding sites for various drugs. While physiological or biochemical measurements of tissue responses to drugs can prove the existence of receptors, only ligand binding studies (or possibly quantitative immunochemical studies) can determine the actual receptor concentration. Radioligand binding experiments are easy to perform, and provide useful data in many Þelds. For example, radioligand binding studies are used to: 1. Study receptor regulation, for example during development, in diseases, or in response to a drug treatment. 2. Discover new drugs by screening for compounds that compete with high afÞnity for radioligand binding to a particular receptor.
    [Show full text]
  • International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification
    0031-6997/03/5504-597–606$7.00 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Vol. 55, No. 4 Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 30404/1114803 Pharmacol Rev 55:597–606, 2003 Printed in U.S.A International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. XXXVIII. Update on Terms and Symbols in Quantitative Pharmacology RICHARD R. NEUBIG, MICHAEL SPEDDING, TERRY KENAKIN, AND ARTHUR CHRISTOPOULOS Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (R.R.N.); Institute de Recherches Internationales Servier, Neuilly sur Seine, France (M.S.); Systems Research, GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (T.K.); and Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (A.C.) Abstract ............................................................................... 597 I. Introduction............................................................................ 597 II. Working definition of a receptor .......................................................... 598 III. Use of drugs in definition of receptors or of signaling pathways ............................. 598 A. The expression of amount of drug: concentration and dose ............................... 598 1. Concentration..................................................................... 598 2. Dose. ............................................................................ 598 B. General terms used to describe drug action ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • First Principles and Their Application to Drug Discovery
    REVIEWS Drug Discovery Today Volume 17, Numbers 1/2 January 2012 The utilization of the kinetic and thermodynamic signatures of preclinical leads is proving pivotal in their triage and rational optimization towards clinical candidates with maximal in vivo efficacy devoid of adverse events. Reviews KEYNOTE REVIEW Target–drug interactions: first principles and their application to drug discovery 1 1 Sara Nu´n˜ez studied organic Sara Nu´n˜ ez , Jennifer Venhorst and Chris G. Kruse chemistry at the University of Barcelona (Spain) and the Abbott Healthcare Products, 1381 CP Weesp, The Netherlands University of London (UK). She received her Ph.D. in 2003 from the University of Manchester (UK), and thereafter did a In this review, we begin by introducing the basic principles of kinetics postdoc in Biophysics at the and thermodynamics of target–drug binding within the context of Albert Einstein College of Medicine (USA). In 2005, she drug discovery. In addition, we present a meta-analysis of the recent joined Solvay Pharmaceuticals (now Abbott Healthcare) in The Netherlands as a postdoctoral fellow; and in 2008, she literature describing the kinetic and thermodynamic resolution of was promoted to Sr. Computational Medicinal Chemist. At Abbott, she has supported the medicinal chemistry efforts successful clinical candidates with diverse mechanisms of action. for neuroscience drug discovery programs, from target We finish by discussing the best practices in the triage and chemical discovery up to and including clinical proof of principle studies. She has supported more than 15 programs optimization towards clinical candidates with maximal in vivo internationally, and was project manager of the D2-103 Top Institute Pharma innitiative.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Framework for Investigating Antipsychotic Action in Humans: Lessons from PET Imaging S Kapur
    Molecular Psychiatry (1998) 3, 135–140 1998 Stockton Press All rights reserved 1359–4184/98 $12.00 PERSPECTIVE A new framework for investigating antipsychotic action in humans: lessons from PET imaging S Kapur Schizophrenia Division and the PET Centre, The Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto; Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto With a decade of neuroreceptor imaging of antipsychotics behind us, this article attempts to synthesise what has been learnt about the mechanism of action of antipsychotics using these techniques. The data show that: (i) the ‘typical’ antipsychotics bind mainly to the dopamine D2 receptor, and that 60–80% D2 occupancy may provide optimal antipsychotic response with little extrapyramidal side effects; (ii) all the clinically available ‘atypical’ antipsychotics show a higher occupancy of the 5-HT2 than D2 receptors; (iii) however, these ‘atypical’ antipsy- chotics differ in their D2 occupancy. The D2 occupancy of risperidone is within the typical range (ie Ͼ 60%) while that of clozapine is clearly lower (Ͻ60%); (iv) antipsychotics with com- bined 5-HT2/D2 antagonism lose some of their ‘atypical’ properties if used in doses where Ͼ their D2 occupancy is too high ( 80%). Based on these data a framework is suggested wherein antipsychotics may be classified on the basis of their D2 and 5-HT2 occupancy in patients at steady state while taking clinically relevant doses. Within this framework typical antipsy- chotics are classified as ‘high-D2’, risperidone as ‘high-D2 high-5HT2’ and clozapine as a ‘low- D2 high-5HT2’ antipsychotic. The justification, limitations and the value of this framework in understanding and investigating newer antipsychotics is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Regularized Full Reference Tissue Model for PET Neuroreceptor Mapping
    NeuroImage 139 (2016) 405–414 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect NeuroImage journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg A regularized full reference tissue model for PET neuroreceptor mapping Joseph B. Mandeville a,⁎, Christin Y.M. Sander a, Hsiao-Ying Wey a, Jacob M. Hooker a, Hanne D. Hansen b, Claus Svarer b, Gitte M. Knudsen b, Bruce R. Rosen a a Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States b Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark article info abstract Article history: The full reference tissue model (FRTM) is a PET analysis framework that includes both free and specifically Received 15 January 2016 bound compartments within tissues, together with rate constants defining association and dissociation Accepted 24 June 2016 from the specifically bound compartment. The simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) assumes instanta- Available online 27 June 2016 neous exchange between tissue compartments, and this “1-tissue” approximation reduces the number of parameters and enables more robust mapping of non-displaceable binding potentials. Simulations based upon FRTM have shown that SRTM exhibits biases that are spatially dependent, because biases depend upon binding potentials. In this work, we describe a regularized model (rFRTM) that employs a global esti- mate of the dissociation rate constant from the specifically bound compartment (k4). The model provides an internal calibration for optimizing k4 through the reference-region outflow rate k2′, a model parameter that should be a global constant but varies regionally in SRTM. Estimates of k4 by rFRTM are presented for four PET radioligands.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Conformational Dynamics Dictate the Binding Affinity for a Ligand
    ARTICLE Received 26 Dec 2013 | Accepted 24 Mar 2014 | Published 24 Apr 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4724 Protein conformational dynamics dictate the binding affinity for a ligand Moon-Hyeong Seo1, Jeongbin Park2, Eunkyung Kim1, Sungchul Hohng2,3,4 & Hak-Sung Kim1 Interactions between a protein and a ligand are essential to all biological processes. Binding and dissociation are the two fundamental steps of ligand–protein interactions, and determine the binding affinity. Intrinsic conformational dynamics of proteins have been suggested to play crucial roles in ligand binding and dissociation. Here, we demonstrate how protein dynamics dictate the binding and dissociation of a ligand through a single-molecule kinetic analysis for a series of maltose-binding protein mutants that have different intrinsic conformational dynamics and dissociation constants for maltose. Our results provide direct evidence that the ligand dissociation is determined by the intrinsic opening rate of the protein. 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-701, Korea. 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea. 3 Department of Biophysics and Chemical Biology, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea. 4 National Center for Creative Research Initiatives, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to H.-S.K. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3724 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4724 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4724 ransient interactions between a protein and a ligand are central to all biological processes including signal trans- K34C Tduction, cellular regulation and enzyme catalysis.
    [Show full text]