DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation 8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation 8 TRANSPORTATION 8 CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................................. 8-1 Consultation ............................................................................................................. 8-1 Staffordshire County Council ................................................................................ 8-1 Highways Agency ................................................................................................. 8-2 Methodology ............................................................................................................ 8-2 Accessibility by a Choice of Transport Modes ....................................................... 8-2 Study Area ........................................................................................................... 8-2 Traffic Effects ....................................................................................................... 8-3 Road Safety ......................................................................................................... 8-3 Policy Context .......................................................................................................... 8-3 Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Structure Plan 1996-2011 (Adopted May 2001) 8-4 Planning Policy Guidance (PPG) 13: Transport .................................................... 8-6 Site Location and Highway Context .......................................................................... 8-6 Proposed Development ............................................................................................ 8-6 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 8-6 Operating Periods ................................................................................................ 8-7 Life of Operation ................................................................................................... 8-7 Site Access .......................................................................................................... 8-7 Parking ................................................................................................................. 8-7 HGV Movements .................................................................................................. 8-8 Staff Working Patterns .......................................................................................... 8-9 Baseline Situation .................................................................................................... 8-9 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 8-9 Existing Planning Permission ............................................................................... 8-9 Poplars Landfill ................................................................................................... 8-10 Traffic Movements .............................................................................................. 8-10 Description of Local Road Network ..................................................................... 8-13 Accident Analysis ............................................................................................... 8-14 Traffice Impact Assessment ................................................................................... 8-15 Construction Phase ............................................................................................ 8-15 Operational Phase .............................................................................................. 8-20 Enviornmental Impact ............................................................................................ 8-30 Fugitive Material ................................................................................................. 8-30 Vehicle Operation ............................................................................................... 8-31 Construction Traffic Management Plan ............................................................... 8-31 Sustainability .......................................................................................................... 8-31 Bus ..................................................................................................................... 8-31 Train ................................................................................................................... 8-32 Walking and Cycling ........................................................................................... 8-32 Car Sharing ........................................................................................................ 8-32 Travel Plan ......................................................................................................... 8-32 Summary and Conclusion ...................................................................................... 8-33 TRANSPORTATION 8 INTRODUCTION 8.1 This Section of the ES is a Transport Assessment (TA) which considers the impact, in traffic terms, on the adjacent highway network. It considers all of the issues relating to transport impact, including a review of the baseline situation, details of existing trips generation, baseline traffic levels and recorded accidents. 8.2 The TA assesses likely future trip generation and the likely impact caused by these trips on the transport network. Junction capacity assessments have been carries out to confirm the future operation of local junctions. 8.3 The TA is based on traffic and accident data which has been collected to provide a baseline situation. It also assesses the options for sustainable travel to the site. 8.4 This chapter takes advice from the document Guidance on Transport Assessment (GTA), published by the Department for Transport in March 2007 and Staffordshire County Council‟s A-Z Guide to Planning Applications Submitted to Staffordshire County Council, March 2008 and Guidance for Transport Assessment and Travel Plans, January 2008. 8.5 Also, advice has been taken from the Supplementary Guidance1 to the Approved Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Structure Plan 1996-2011. 8.6 It should be noted that the application site already has outline planning consent for the development of industry and warehousing, which would generate more traffic than the proposed development CONSULTATION Staffordshire County Council 8.7 SLR met with Staffordshire County Council on 29 April 2010 where the following scope was agreed for undertaking the TA. TA will be based on a facility accepting 400,000 tonnes of waste per annum; 100,000 tonnes of waste from the Poplars landfill would be diverted to the new ERF site access and this would be taken into account; years to be surveyed are year of opening (2014) and five years after opening (2019); traffic growth to be forecast using NRTF adjusted using Tempro; junctions to be assessed are Kingswood Lakeside roundabout, roundabout at Orbital Way/A460 Eastern Way and traffic signals at A5 Watling Street / Washbrook Lane; 1 Code of Practise for the Assessment of the Impact and Determination of Mitigation Measures arising from Heavy Commercial Vehicles (HCVs) generated from Mineral and Waste Developments Kingswood ERF – Volume 3 8-1 SLR Consulting Limited TRANSPORTATION 8 Construction and Operational phases of development to be assessed. ARCADY to be used for assessing roundabouts, LINSIG to be used for assessing traffic signals. Highways Agency 8.8 The proposed development would generate a number of new HGV trips on the primary highway network under the management of the Highways Agency (HA), namely the A5 Watling Street and the A460 Eastern Way. However, the application site already has planning consent for industry and warehousing (B2 and B8 uses), which would typically generate more traffic than now proposed and therefore the impact on the A5 will be no greater than already consented. The HA were consulted on this matter through a letter from SLR dated 14 May 2010 which detailed the proposals and the subsequent impact on HA maintained roads. 8.9 No response has been received at the time of writing this Section of the ES. METHODOLOGY Accessibility by a Choice of Transport Modes 8.10 A review of the provision and quality of existing transport infrastructure for all modes of travel has been undertaken to assess the accessibility of the application site against what might be considered to be a realistic standard of provision for the type of development. 8.11 The accessibility of the application site by non-car modes of travel has been assessed against the following three criteria:- the proximity of the nearest serviced interchanges to the application site and the opportunities for interconnecting links between the site and these interchanges; the frequency of services available from the transport interchanges; and the destinations served by the services. 8.12 The accessibility of the site by car has been considered by reference to its geographical location in the context of infrastructure serving the immediate locality as well as the wider area. Study Area 8.13 An assessment has been made of the local highway network to determine the impact that the proposed ERF could have on key junctions in the locality during the period over which the ERF would be constructed and operational. The junctions included in the assessments are:- Orbital Way / A460 Eastern Way Roundabout; Kingswood Lakeside Roundabout; and Kingswood ERF – Volume 3 8-2 SLR Consulting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report-Cannock Railway Station
    Item No. 14.1 Report of: Head of Economic Prosperity Contact Officer: Dean Piper / Debbie Harris Contact Number: 01543 464223 Portfolio Leader: Economic Development & Planning Key Decision: Yes Report Track: Cabinet: 28/01/21 Cabinet 28 January 2021 Cannock Railway Station 1 Purpose of Report 1.1 The report presents to Cabinet the Strategic Outline Business Case (SOBC) for a transformational upgrade of Cannock Railway Station and sets out the implications and potential next steps. 1.2 The report also provides Cabinet with an update on a set of planned improvements to enhance the Station in the short-term which the Council is implementing in partnership with Staffordshire County Council, West Midlands Rail and West Midlands Trains. 2 Recommendation(s) 2.1 That Cabinet notes the Strategic Outline Business Case (SOBC) for the transformational upgrade of Cannock Railway Station as attached at Appendix 1. 2.2 That Cabinet agrees that Options A and C as set out in the SOBC should be selected as the two shortlisted options to be developed further. 2.3 That Cabinet authorises the Head of Economic Prosperity in consultation with the Portfolio Leader for Economic Development and Planning, to work in partnership with West Midlands Rail Executive and Staffordshire County Council to develop the Outline Business Case and delegate authority to the Head of Economic Prosperity to decide on the timing and procurement strategy for this work. 2.4 That Cabinet authorises the Head of Economic Prosperity in consultation with the Head of Finance and the Portfolio Leader for Economic Development and Planning to submit relevant bids for external funding to secure investment to support the upgrade of the Station.
    [Show full text]
  • 06-Cannock Railway Station Rpt Cab 131218.Docx
    ITEM NO. 9.1 Report of: Head of Economic Prosperity Contact Officer: Dean Piper Telephone No: 01543 464223 Portfolio Leader: Economic Development & Planning Key Decision: No Report Track: Cabinet: 13/12/18 CABINET 13 DECEMBER 2018 CANNOCK RAILWAY STATION 1 Purpose of Report 1.1 To endorse the use of £231,000 of Council funding towards the cost of developing an Outline Business Case to set out the case for securing a transformational upgrade of Cannock Railway Station in partnership with the West Midlands Rail Executive (WMRE), Network Rail, West Midlands Trains and Staffordshire County Council. 2 Recommendations 2.1 That Cabinet approves the allocation of £231,000 towards a total cost of £400,000 to allow for the development of the Outline Business Case for the upgrade / improvement of Cannock Railway Station. 2.2 That Cabinet notes the contribution of £129,000 towards the cost of the Outline Business Case from the Joint Investment Fund (agreed with Staffordshire County Council). 2.3 That Cabinet notes the joint contribution of £40,000 towards the cost of the Outline Business Case from the West Midlands Rail Executive and West Midlands Trains. 2.4 That Cabinet authorises the Head of Economic Prosperity in consultation with the Portfolio Leader for Economic Development and Planning, to work in partnership with West Midlands Rail Executive, Network Rail, West Midlands Trains and Staffordshire County Council to develop the Outline Business Case and design for a transformed Railway Station at its existing location. 2.5 That a report is brought back to Cabinet by the Head of Economic Prosperity on the completion of the Outline Business Case setting out next steps ITEM NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Report-Annual Performance 2018/19
    ITEM NO. 7.1 Report of: Head of Governance and Corporate Services Contact Officer: Adrian Marklew Telephone No: 01543 464 598 Portfolio Leader: Corporate Improvement Key Decision: No Report Track: Cabinet: 13/06/19 CABINET 13 JUNE 2019 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018/19 1 Purpose of Report 1.1 To advise Members on the position at the end of 2018/19, in respect of the Priority Outcomes as set out in the Corporate Plan 2018-23 and the supporting Priority Delivery Plans (PDPs) for 2018/19. The report sets out the performance for Quarter 4 and a summary of performance for the year. 2 Recommendations 2.1 To note the performance information relating to Priority Delivery Plans as detailed at Appendices 1-4. 2.2 To note the actions which have been flagged as being carried forward to 2019/20. 3 Key Issues and Reasons for Recommendations Reasons for Recommendations 3.1 Information for performance actions and indicators for each of the Priorities is set out in Appendices 1 to 4. The overall rankings for each priority area are detailed in Section 5. Overall, 72.38% of actions/projects have been delivered. 4 Relationship to Corporate Priorities 4.1 This report supports the Council’s Corporate Priorities as follows: (i) The indicators and actions contribute individually to the Council’s strategic objectives as set out in the Corporate Plan 2018-23. ITEM NO. 7.2 5 Report Detail 5.1 The Council’s Corporate Plan 2018-23 was approved by Cabinet on 19 April 2018 and sets out the mission, priorities and strategic objectives of Cannock Chase District Council for the next five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Bleak House, Cannock Chase
    Bleak House, Cannock Chase Vision Document March 2017 All plans are reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. Crown copyright Reserved. Licence No. AR152684. Barton Willmore Regents House 4 Homer Road Solihull B91 3QQ T: 0121 711 5151 E: [email protected] Desk Top Publishing and Graphic Design by Barton Willmore This artwork was printed on paper using fibre sourced from sustainable plantation wood from suppliers who practice sustainable management of forests in line with strict international standards. Pulp used in its manufacture is also Elemental Chlorine Free (ECF). Barton Willmore Copyright The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of Barton Willmore. J:\20000 - 20999\20400 - 20499\20485 - Bleak House, Cannock\A5 - Reports & Graphics\ Graphics\Vision Document\ 20485 - Bleak House, Cannock - Vision Document.indd Document Status Final Revision - Author Various Checked By JR Authorised By JR Issue Date March 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Planning Context 6 3. National Planning Policy 8 4. National Green Belt Policy 10 5. Case for Growth at Bleak House 12 6. Environment Considerations 16 7. Vision for the Site and Concept Plan 20 8. Sustainable Development Principles 26 9. Deliverability 28 10. Conclusions 30 1. Introduction This is a Vision Document prepared on behalf of the Church Commissioners for England to support a proposal for a high quality residential-led development at Bleak House, Cannock Chase. Our vision Introduction 1.1 The long term vision for the site is to deliver a sustainable 1.3 Bleak House provides a unique opportunity to deliver a extension to Wimblebury and Rawnsley in Cannock Chase of sustainable, high quality residential-led development which will around 1,000 dwellings on land to the east of Wimblebury, help meet the housing needs of both Cannock Chase Council and Cannock (known as ‘Bleak House’).
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Centre, PO Box 28, Beecroft Road, Cannock, Staffordshire WS11 1BG
    Please ask for: Steve Partridge Your Ref: Extension No: 4588 My Ref: E-Mail: [email protected] 8 November, 2017 Dear Councillor, CABINET 4:00 PM ON THURSDAY, 16 NOVEMBER, 2017 WESTERN SPRINGS ROOM, CIVIC CENTRE, CANNOCK You are invited to attend this meeting for consideration of the matters itemised in the following Agenda. Yours sincerely, T. McGovern, Managing Director To: Councillors: G. Adamson Leader of the Council G. Alcott Deputy Leader of the Council and Economic Development and Planning Portfolio Leader J.T. Kraujalis Corporate Improvement Portfolio Leader C. Bennett Crime and Partnerships Portfolio Leader Mrs. C. Mitchell Culture and Sport Portfolio Leader J.P.T.L. Preece Environment Portfolio Leader Mrs. M.A. Davis Health and Wellbeing Portfolio Leader F.W.C. Allen Housing Portfolio Leader Mrs. D.M. Todd Town Centre Regeneration Portfolio Leader Civic Centre, PO Box 28, Beecroft Road, Cannock, Staffordshire WS11 1BG tel 01543 462621 | fax 01543 462317 | www.cannockchasedc.gov.uk Search for ‘Cannock Chase Life’ @CannockChaseDC A G E N D A PART 1 1. Apologies 2. Declarations of Interests of Members in Contracts and Other Matters and Restriction on Voting by Members To declare any personal, pecuniary or disclosable pecuniary interests in accordance with the Code of Conduct and any possible contraventions under Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. 3. Updates from Portfolio Leaders To receive and consider oral updates (if any), from the Leader of the Council, the Deputy Leader, and Portfolio Leaders. 4. Minutes To approve the Minutes of the meeting held on 19 October, 2017 (enclosed).
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan Preferred Options
    Cannock Chase District Local Plan Preferred Options February 2021 1. Non-Technical Summary INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Cannock Chase District Local Plan will guide and manage the development of the District during the period to 2038. The Local Plan will identify land to meet the needs of the economy and to ensure that a sufficient number of homes can be built. New development will be well-designed and safe, and will have good access to schools, health services, parks and green spaces, leisure facilities and other services. New development will be accommodated whilst protecting and enhancing the natural, built and historic environment. 1.2 The Council asked people for their views on what sort of things should be covered by the Local Plan through an ‘Issues and Options Consultation’ in May 2019. The responses to that consultation have been taken into account in the Local Plan ‘Preferred Options’ consultation document (spring 2021). The ‘Preferred Options’ document identifies the sites that could be suitable for new development, and sets out draft policies that could be used to guide and manage the development of the District. This document provides a summary of the Local Plan ‘Preferred Options’ consultation document. 1.3 The Council will consider the responses to the ‘Preferred Options’ consultation, before preparing a complete draft of the Local Plan. This will be called the ‘Pre-Submission (Regulation 19) Draft Local Plan’, and it will be published in winter 2021 for consultation. After that, the Local Plan will be submitted to the Secretary of State (Planning Inspectorate) for independent examination, probably over the summer 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Study WP2 Intro and Hawks Green Business Park Final
    Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Project: Mobility Management for Business and Industrial Zones Acronym of the Project: MoMa.BIZ Work Package: 2 Study of the BIZ Southern Staffordshire Chamber Business Services Birmingham Chamber Group November 2010 1 Mobi lity Management for Business & In dustrial Zones Acronym of the Project: MoMa.BIZ This 30 month Intelligent Energy Europe – (IEE) Project focuses on the mobility problems experienced on Business and Industrial Zones located in five small to m edium size European Countries : • UK – Cannock Chase • Italy – Asti • Spain – Ponferrada • Spain - Andulacia • Estonia - Tartu • Bulgaria - Asenovgrad The aim of the Project is for the six partners over the five Countries to establish a mobility management methodology that could be applied to Business and Industrial Zones (BIZ) all around Eur ope. The need for this methodology stems from the increasing number of similar BIZ in Europe and the mobility issues encountered at them. These issues are generally similar between different European sites and they are mainly characterised by a very weak alternative to the private car for the home to work commute, resulting in a percentage of car use higher than 80%. The cause of this principally lies on two factors, the location of these BIZ in remote areas, meaning public transport links are weak and a lso on the employees themselves that demand flexibility in their transport options because of work needs. The aims of the Project are to: • Produce a ‘Boxed Solution’ methodology which can be transferred
    [Show full text]
  • Four Ashes Limited
    Document 6.2 7KHWest Midlands Rail Freight Interchange Order 201X ES - Vol 1 - Chapter 15: Transport and Access Regulation 5(2)(a) WSP - July 2018 Four Ashes Ltd Volume 1: Environmental Statement Main Report Chapter 15: Transport 15 Transport and Access to encourage further use of non-car modes of transport. The overall management and Introduction implementation of the SWTP will be the responsibility of the Travel Plan Co-ordinator under the employment of FAL. The SWTP will be used as an overarching document within which This chapter of the ES assesses the likely significant environmental effects associated with the individual occupiers will produce their own Occupier Travel Plans (OTP). OTPs will be required Proposed Development in respect of Transport and Access. In particular, this chapter describes to be in place prior to occupation of a new warehouse on-site. the relevant legislation and Transport policy context; the methods used for assessment and details of the criteria used to determine significance; the baseline Transport conditions at and The Sustainable Transport Strategy is also included as an appendix to the Transport surrounding the Site; the potential impacts and effects as a result of the Proposed Assessment. This sets out the strategy to improve the bus, walking and cycling infrastructure. Development; any mitigation or control measures required to reduce or eliminate adverse Contributions towards key elements of the Sustainable Transport Strategy, including shuttle effects; and the subsequent residual effects and likely significant effects associated with the buses, will be secured through the Section 106 Agreement and improvements to walking and Proposed Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Centre, PO Box 28, Beecroft Road, Cannock, Staffordshire WS11 1BG
    Please ask for: Steve Partridge Extension No: 4588 E-Mail: [email protected] 5 December, 2018 Dear Councillor, CABINET 4:00 PM ON THURSDAY, 13 DECEMBER, 2018 ESPERANCE ROOM, CIVIC CENTRE, CANNOCK You are invited to attend this meeting for consideration of the matters itemised in the following Agenda. Yours sincerely, T. McGovern, Managing Director To: Councillors: G. Adamson Leader of the Council G. Alcott Deputy Leader of the Council and Economic Development and Planning Portfolio Leader J.T. Kraujalis Corporate Improvement Portfolio Leader C. Bennett Crime and Partnerships Portfolio Leader Mrs. C. Mitchell Culture and Sport Portfolio Leader J.P.T.L. Preece Environment Portfolio Leader Mrs. C.E. Martin Health and Wellbeing Portfolio Leader A.R. Pearson Housing Portfolio Leader Mrs. D.M. Todd Town Centre Regeneration Portfolio Leader Civic Centre, PO Box 28, Beecroft Road, Cannock, Staffordshire WS11 1BG tel 01543 462621 | fax 01543 462317 | www.cannockchasedc.gov.uk Search for ‘Cannock Chase Life’ @CannockChaseDC A G E N D A PART 1 1. Apologies 2. Declarations of Interests of Members in Contracts and Other Matters and Restriction on Voting by Members To declare any personal, pecuniary or disclosable pecuniary interests in accordance with the Code of Conduct and any possible contraventions under Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. 3. Updates from Portfolio Leaders To receive and consider oral updates (if any), from the Leader of the Council, the Deputy Leader, and Portfolio Leaders. 4. Minutes To approve the Minutes of the meeting held on 8 November, 2018 (enclosed). 5. Forward Plan Forward Plan of Decisions to be taken by the Cabinet: December 2018 to February 2019 (Item 5.1 – 5.3).
    [Show full text]
  • Limepit Lane, Huntington
    Limepit Lane, Huntington Vision Document December 2019 Page 1 Barton Willmore / 9th Floor / Bank House / 8 Cherry Street / Birmingham / B2 5AL tel: 0121 711 5151/ email: [email protected] Desk Top Publishing and Graphic Design by Barton Willmore Graphic Design This artwork was printed on paper using fibre sourced from sustainable plantation wood from suppliers who practice sustainable management of forests in line with strict international standards. Pulp used in its manufacture is also Elemental Chlorine Free (ECF). \\srvslvfiles1\Files\30000 - 30999\30500 - 30599\30589 - Limepit Lane, Huntington\A5 - Reports & Graphics\ Graphic Design\Documents\Draft\30589 Vision 10 © The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of The Barton Willmore Partnership. All plans are reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. Crown Copyright Reserved. License No. 100019279. Date 12/12/2019 Status - FINAL Author - DW Checked by - LH Page 2 Contents 1. The Vision 4 2. Introduction 6 3. Planning Context 8 4. Site Location & Context 10 5. Key Opportunities 14 6. The Proposals 18 7. Development Benefits 20 Page 3 1. The Vision to provide a sustainable development offering a range of high-quality housing of “approximately 130 dwellings for the local community, within walking distance of Huntington Village Centre. The development seeks to use best practice urban design principles to promote a high-quality“ living environment that is responsive to its surroundings and local context. Page 4 A development which knits into the existing community fabric The development will work to work with the existing community through the improvement of the existing rugby club facilities, the provision of new public open space and the creation of new pedestrian and recreational routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G: Technical Note 19 (Sustainable Transport Strategy)
    APPENDIX G: TECHNICAL NOTE 19 (SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT STRATEGY) West Midlands Interchange Transport Assessment DCO Submission WEST MIDLANDS INTERCHANGE SUBJECT: Technical Note 19 - Sustainable Transport Strategy DATE: 07 May 2018 Client Four Ashes Ltd Project Number 70001979 Version 5 Author Tom Pettyt / Tom Beck / Andy Winmill Authorised Neil Findlay 1 Introduction 1.1 WSP has been commissioned by Four Ashes Limited to provide transport advice in relation to the proposed development of a Strategic Rail Freight Interchange (SRFI) on land located at Four Ashes, Staffordshire. The Site is located approximately 10km north of Wolverhampton and lies immediately west of Junction 12 of the M6 1.2 The development, known as West Midlands Interchange (WMI), will include; · An intermodal freight terminal with direct connections to the West Coast Main Line, capable of accommodating up to 10 trains per day and trains of up to 775m long, including container storage, Heavy Goods Vehicle (‘HGV’) parking, rail control building and staff facilities; · Up to 743,200 square metres (gross internal area) of rail served warehousing and ancillary service buildings; · New road infrastructure and works to the existing road infrastructure; · Demolition and alterations to existing structures and earthworks to create development plots and landscape zones; · Reconfiguring and burying of electricity pylons and cables; and · Strategic landscaping and open space, including alterations to public rights of way and the creation of new ecological enhancement areas and publicly
    [Show full text]
  • Cannock Chase Local Plan Local Plan (Part 1) 2014
    CANNOCK CHASE LOCAL PLAN LOCAL PLAN (PART 1) 2014 PREFACE Cannock Chase Council Rugeley Town Centre Area Action Plan (Pre-Publication Draft) Cannock Chase Local Plan Local Plan (Part ) 204 Preface The Local Plan is a development plan document produced under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 as amended to help shape the way in which the physical, economic, social and environmental characteristics of Cannock Chase District will change between 2006 and 2028. Rugeley Town Centre Area Action Plan Development Plan Document (2010) Local Plan Part 1 brings together the former emerging Core Strategy and Rugeley Town Centre Pre-PublicationArea Action PlanDraft into one document. The first section of Local Plan Part 1 therefore provides the context and process for setting strategic and development management policy for the District, Cannockwith the secondChase sectionLocal Developmentproviding the moreFramework detailed policy context for Rugeley Town Centre. TheLocalRugeley Plan PartTown 2 willCentre identifyArea site specificAction allocationsPlan is produced as well asby thethe variousPlanning standardsPolicy to beUnit of Planningapplied inServices order to helpat Cannock deliver theChase strategicCouncil. policy. PartTo 2 orderwill alsofurther help addresscopies Birmingham’sor for further information:housing needs should this be necessary following further evidence gathering, either by identifying further capacity within the plan period or safeguarding land for development beyond Writethe planto: period. In addition, Part 2 will safeguard sites for potential development beyond the plan period to help meet future District needs. Part 2 will be informed by a review of the Green Belt Planningto be undertakenPolicy in full consultation with stakeholders. Should any further Area Action Plan be PlanningconsideredServices appropriate for the District this will also be undertaken within Part 2.
    [Show full text]