DOCSLIB.ORG

Clergy Voices: How Conflicts Over Racism and Sexuality in America Are Framed from the Pulpit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clergy Voices: How Conflicts Over Racism and Sexuality in America Are Framed from the Pulpit Clergy Voices: How Conflicts over Racism and Sexuality in America are Framed from the Pulpit Claire Chipman Gilliland A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Sociology in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2021 Approved by: Lisa D. Pearce Neal Caren Paul Djupe Ted Mouw Andrew Perrin © 2021 Claire Chipman Gilliland ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT In the midst of growing inequality and persistent marginalization in the U.S., this project investigates the role of one institution, religion, in combatting or perpetuating inequality. I investigate religious rhetoric on race and homosexuality using qualitative coding methods on two samples of sermons, or the weekly messages clergy share from the pulpit. In the first paper, I analyze the responses of Charlottesville clergy to the 2017 white supremacist rally. Overall, clergy’s sermons following the Unite the Right rally demonstrate racial frameworks that downplay the relevance of structural and historical factors in shaping racial divisions today, keeping racism grounded at the individual, interpersonal, and other-worldly levels. The second sample is composed of sermons from United Methodist (UMC) congregations following their 2019 denominational vote to maintain their prohibitions of same sex marriage and the ordination of openly gay and lesbian people to the clergy. In the second paper, I investigate how UMC clergy’s responses to the UMC decision reflect prophetic concerns, such as the ongoing marginalization of LGBTQ people, and pragmatic concerns related to denominational and congregational unity. In the final paper, I use the same set of UMC sermons to focus on a distinctive subsample that openly defies the rules of the denomination related to same sex marriage and LGBTQ ordination. In both the second and third papers, we see concern for LGBTQ people in the midst of a contentious denominational vote as well as clergy navigating their role as organizational leaders responsible for maintaining legitimacy and organizational stability. My analyses across these three papers demonstrate that many clergy discuss racism and LGBTQ exclusion in their sermons, but not necessarily in ways that may shape individual iii attitudes. Religious rhetoric has implications beyond religious organizations, and understanding religious messages about race and sexuality is an important and timely concern. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful for the support of a Dissertation Fellowship from the Louisville Institute during my final year of doctoral work (2020-2021). Additionally, my data collection and transcription costs for both samples of sermons were covered by grants from the UNC Institute for African American Research and the Religious Research Association. Thank you to my graduate advisor, Dr. Lisa Pearce, for six years of support throughout every stage of every project. Thanks also to Dr. Paul Djupe for consistent feedback and advising on my dissertation, and to the faculty who served on my dissertation committee: Dr. Neal Caren, Dr. Ted Mouw, and Dr. Andrew Perrin. I owe a great deal of gratitude to the many people who have supported me. I worked on this dissertation in both Chapel Hill, NC and Greenville, SC, and my friends and colleagues in both places have provided tremendous support, laughter, and love. Beyond these two places, I’m grateful to have friends and family who will text, call, visit, and send care packages from wherever each of us may be. My family has remained steadfast in their love and support for my entire life, and this has not wavered as we figured out what it means to get a PhD together. A final thanks to Mac, who loves me through the day-to-day, ups-and-downs of all things, and who let me get two cats as work-from-home companions. Any errors in this document are my own alone, but any success and pride I share with all of you. v Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. VIII Dissertation Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Calling for Transformation or Waiting on Jesus: Racial Ideologies from the Pulpit ................... 12 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 12 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................................. 14 Data and Methods ..................................................................................................................... 21 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 24 Discussion and Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 36 Works Cited .............................................................................................................................. 41 Tables ........................................................................................................................................ 47 Prophetic and Pragmatic: UMC Clergy Respond to Denominational Debates over Homosexuality .............................................................................................................................. 50 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 50 Theoretical Framing .................................................................................................................. 52 Data and Methods ..................................................................................................................... 61 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 64 Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 75 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 79 Works Cited .............................................................................................................................. 81 Tables ........................................................................................................................................ 86 vi Getting Permission to Break the Rules: Clergy Respond to LGBTQ Exclusion in the United Methodist Church .............................................................................................................. 91 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 91 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................................. 94 Data and Methods ................................................................................................................... 102 Results ..................................................................................................................................... 106 Discussion and Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 115 Works Cited ............................................................................................................................ 121 Tables ...................................................................................................................................... 125 Dissertation Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 128 Appendix 1: Supplemental Data and Analyses ........................................................................... 138 Charlottesville Clergy Survey ................................................................................................. 138 Works Cited ............................................................................................................................ 141 Tables ...................................................................................................................................... 142 vii List of Tables Table 1.1: Descriptive Data for Full Population of Congregations in Charlottesville...................47 Table 1.2: Descriptive Data of Charlottesville Sample..................................................................48 Table 1.3: Discussions of Race and Racism in Sermons using Individual/Relational, Other-worldly, and Structural Frameworks at the Congregational Level (N=38).............49 Table 2.1: Descriptive Data for Full Sample of UMC Congregations (n=601).............................86 Table 2.2: Descriptive Data for Subsample of UMC Congregations with Online Sermons (n=159)................................................................................................................87 Table 2.3: Descriptive Data at Sermon Level (n=455)..................................................................88 Table 2.4: Proportion of Sermons and Congregations that Discuss General Conference.............89
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Charlottesville: One Year Later
    Charlottesville: One Year Later Sections 1 Introduction 4 Unite the Right 2 2 The Charlottesville Backlash 5 White Supremacy Continues to Surge 3 Disunity and Division INTRODUCTION On August 11, 2017, the world watched in horror as hundreds of torch-wielding white supremacists descended on the University of Virginia campus, chanting, “Jews will not replace us!” The next day, the streets of Charlottesville exploded in violence, ringing with the racist shouts of th thththththeeee n nnneo-Nazis,eo-Nazis,eo-Nazis,eo-Nazis, Klan KlanKlanKlan m mmmembersembersembersembers an ananandddd alt altaltalt rightrightrightright agitat agitatagitatagitatorsorsorsors wh whwhwhoooo gath gathgathgathererereredededed in ininin an ananan unpr unprunprunprecedentedecedentedecedentedecedented sh shshshowowowow of ofofof unity unityunityunity. Their stated 1 / 9 common cause: To protest the removal of a Confederate statue from a local park. Their true purpose: To show to the world the strength and defiance of the white supremacist movement. The promise of Unite the Right, organized primarily by alt right activist Jason Kessler, brought white supremacists of all stripesstripesstripesstripes t tttogethogethogethogetherererer for forforfor a aaa week weekweekweekenenenendddd of ofofof prprprprotestotestotestotest that thatthatthat quickly quicklyquicklyquickly turn turnturnturnedededed t tttoooo vio viovioviolenlenlenlence,ce,ce,ce, culminating in the brutal murder of anti- racist counter-protester Heather Heyer. The white supremacist mayhem prevented the Saturday rally itself from actually occurring, as local and state police converged on the chaotic scene, urging everyone off the streets and away from the parks. Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe declared a state of emergency and authorities shut down Unite the Right. Despite this, high profile white supremacists like Richard Spencer and David Duke declardeclardeclardeclaredededed Unite UniteUniteUnite th thththeeee Right RightRightRight an ananan o ooovvvverallerallerallerall vict victvictvictororororyyyy.....
    [Show full text]
  • Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech Chloe M
    Brooklyn Law Review Volume 84 | Issue 1 Article 21 Fall 10-1-2018 Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech Chloe M. Gordils Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Chloe M. Gordils, Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech, 84 Brook. L. Rev. (2018). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol84/iss1/21 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Law Review by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech INTRODUCTION Consider that you are the owner of a popular hot dog eatery in Berkeley, California. One day in early August, after a long day of sausage sales, you return home and turn on the news, only to see the face of one of your employees participating in a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.1 The next day, a popular Twitter account releases a photo of your employee, mentioning your restaurant, and calling on you to terminate the employee. You find yourself in a tough position. On one hand, you are in charge of a private entity (the hot dog restaurant), with a reputation and legitimate business interests that could suffer due to your continued employment of a known neo-Nazi. On the other hand, you are a steadfast supporter of free speech, and have serious doubts about allowing a Twitter account to dictate your employee’s right to assert his or her sociopolitical views off the clock, while maintaining a job.
    [Show full text]
  • Adopt a Resolution to Denounce and Oppose White Nationalist and Neo-Nazi Groups Including Their Actions
    Page 1 of 7 Cheryl Davila Councilmember District 2 CONSENT CALENDAR February 26, 2019 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Councilmembers Cheryl Davila, Ben Bartlett, Kate Harrison and Mayor Jesse Arreguin Subject: Adopt a resolution to denounce and oppose white nationalist and neo-Nazi groups including their actions. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution denouncing and opposing white nationalist and neo-Nazi groups including their actions. POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION On February 4, 2019, the Agenda and Rules Committee adopted the following action: M/S/C (Arreguin/Wengraf) to send the item to the full Council with a Positive Recommendation. Vote: All Ayes. FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION No general fund impact. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY No ecological impact. BACKGROUND According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, “white nationalist groups espouse white supremacist or white separatist ideologies, often focusing on the alleged inferiority of nonwhites. Groups listed in a variety of other categories - Ku Klux Klan, neo- Page 2 of 7 Confederate, neo-Nazi, racist skinhead, and Christian Identity - could also be fairly described as white nationalist.”1 As documented in the November 3, 2018 cover article of the New York Times Magazine, since 9/11, U.S. counter-terrorism policy has focused almost entirely on combating American and foreign-born “jihadists,” failing to recognize the growing threat of far-right extremism. This has contributed to widespread vigilante attacks on, government surveillance and repression of, and sweeping policies that discriminate against Muslim, Arab and South Asian communities. Meanwhile, it has failed to address the growing threat and presence of white nationalists and neo-Nazis across the U.S.2 As Janet Reitman’s article documents, according to the data, far-right extremists have killed more people since 9/11 than any other category of domestic terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Propaganda, Jewish-Americans and the 2018 Midterms
    A report from the Center on Technology and Society OCT 2018 Computational Propaganda, Jewish-Americans and the 2018 Midterms: The Amplification of Anti-Semitic Harassment Online Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all. ABOUT CENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY AND THE BELFER FELLOWS In a world riddled with cyberhate, online harassment, and misuses of ADL (Anti-Defamation technology, the Center for Technology & Society (CTS) serves as a resource League) fights anti-Semitism to tech platforms and develops proactive solutions. Launched in 2017 and and promotes justice for all. headquartered in Silicon Valley, CTS aims for global impacts and applications in an increasingly borderless space. It is a force for innovation, producing Join ADL to give a voice to cutting-edge research to enable online civility, protect vulnerable populations, those without one and to support digital citizenship, and engage youth. CTS builds on ADL’s century of protect our civil rights. experience building a world without hate and supplies the tools to make that a possibility both online and off-line. Learn more: adl.org The Belfer Fellowship program supports CTS’s efforts to create innovative solutions to counter online hate and ensure justice and fair treatment for all in the digital age through fellowships in research and outreach projects. The program is made possible by a generous contribution from the Robert A. and Renée E. Belfer Family Foundation. The inaugural 2018-2019 Fellows are: • Rev. Dr. Patricia Novick, Ph.D., of the Multicultural Leadership Academy, a program that brings Latino and African-American leaders together.
    [Show full text]
  • A Recent History of Anarchist Struggle In
    Introduction The compilation of this history was inspired by “Fighting Collective Amnesia”, which points to how anarchists can build a stronger movement going forward by first remembering and reflecting on our history: “We are suffering from a collective amnesia around state repression and recent history …Collective amnesia is when we forget the stories, victories, mistakes, and debates of the recent past. It’s when we allow security culture to deteriorate and put ourselves and each other at risk unnecessarily. It’s when we think that the state doesn’t take us FROM ANTIGLOBE seriously and when we don’t take our work seriously. It’s when we don’t share a common understanding of where we came from as an anarchist movement. This is especially dangerous for people who are TO ANTIFA new to these movements and circles, but most of us seem to be A RECENT HISTORY OF ANARCHIST suffering from this amnesia. This puts all of us at risk of state repression and the inaction that comes with constantly starting over STRUGGLE IN NYC with the same debates and mistakes… …We can fight collective amnesia by building a collective memory. We need a collective memory to adapt our struggles, lest we end up with the “immortal science” of creating endless front groups or more _______________________________ likely, a cliquey subculture full of informal social hierarchy. We all need to remember our recent history. We all need to remember what Written by some NYC anarchists worked and what went wrong. We all need to remember the ones we’ve lost to the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Warlords, Such As It Is, Be Part Revenge, Part Explainer, and Partly the Story of What Hate Does to Those Who Observe It and Those Who Manufacture It
    Contents Cover Title Page Copyright Dedication Epigraph Introduction Chapter 1: On Hating Chapter 2: The Jews Chapter 3: Boots on for the Boogaloo Chapter 4: Operation Ashlynn Chapter 5: Adventures with Incels Chapter 6: That Good Old-Time Religion Chapter 7: Tween Racists, Bad Beanies, and the Great Casino Chase Chapter 8: Getting to the Boom: On Accelerationism and Violence Chapter 9: Antifa Civil War Chapter 10: We Keep Us Safe Afterword Discover More Acknowledgments Endnotes Copyright © 2020 by Talia Lavin Cover design by Keith Hayes Cover copyright © 2020 by Hachette Book Group, Inc. Hachette Book Group supports the right to free expression and the value of copyright. The purpose of copyright is to encourage writers and artists to produce the creative works that enrich our culture. The scanning, uploading, and distribution of this book without permission is a theft of the author’s intellectual property. If you would like permission to use material from the book (other than for review purposes), please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your support of the author’s rights. Hachette Books Hachette Book Group 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10104 HachetteBooks.com Twitter.com/HachetteBooks Instagram.com/HachetteBooks First Edition: October 2020 Published by Hachette Books, an imprint of Perseus Books, LLC, a subsidiary of Hachette Book Group, Inc. The Hachette Books name and logo is a trademark of the Hachette Book Group. The Hachette Speakers Bureau provides a wide range of authors for speaking events. To find out more, go to www.hachettespeakersbureau.com or call (866) 376-6591.
    [Show full text]
  • NSFH-Report1-Updated8.1.19
    Volkmom, Identity Evropa/American Identity Movement, and the Safety of Our Community A Report from No Space For Hate Recently, activists in Bloomington have raised concerns about the presence of members of a white supremacist organization called "Identity Evropa" (recently rebranded as the "American Identity Movement") in the Bloomington Community Farmers’ Market. This report explains why residents of Bloomington are concerned about white supremacists at the Market. It discusses ● Who "Volkmom" is ● What Identity Evropa is ● Why you should be concerned about the safety of members of our community Who is Volkmom? The community became aware that members of IE/AmIM1 were vendors in the market after activists identified an online user called "Volkmom" as Sarah Dye of Schooner Creek Farms. Volkmom came into the public eye when she was named by Nolan Brewer, a man who pleaded guilty to a federal hate crime charge for bringing homemade napalm and homemade bombs to a synagogue in Carmel, Indiana with the intent to burn it down.[i] Brewer claim he was deterred by ​ ​ the synagogue's security cameras, and instead decided to paint a swastika on one of the outer structures and then light the ground below with the homemade napalm (Figure 1). His wife Kiyomi Brewer, who was a minor at the time, pleaded guilty to the State charge of arson. The Department of Justice (DOJ) argued that Brewer had long held explicitly Nazi views: Co-workers from two different jobs where Brewer worked during 2018 will testify that Brewer wore a swastika or an iron cross on a necklace, had a swastika on the background of his cell phone, routinely spoke about his admiration for Adolf Hitler and/or 1 NSFH encourages the use of the acronym AmIM to distinguish the American Identity Movement from the American Indian Movement™.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey European Heritage Association (NJEHA)
    New Jersey European Heritage Association (NJEHA) Key Points New Jersey European Heritage Association (NJEHA) is a small, New Jersey- based white supremacist group. NJEHA espouses racism, anti-Semitism and intolerance under the guise of “saving” white European peoples from purported imminent extinction. NJEHA spreads their hateful propaganda online and by distributing fliers in central New Jersey. NJEHA has organized and participated in white supremacist rallies and demonstrations. Background 1 / 7 Created in early 2018, the New Jersey European Heritage Association (NJEHA) is a small white supremacist group whose members see themselves as defenders of white European people and white culture. Members hold the white supremacist worldview that unless immediate action is taken, the white race is doomed to extinction by a "rising tide of color" purportedly controlled and manipulated by Jews. According to the group’s website manifesto, members “do not see the current society as a healthy and cohesive environment suited for their children and grandchildren.” They believe that “they must wrest political, economic and social control away from the hostile elite who have usurped power in America.” By promoting their ideas to the “public mainstream” through fliering, banner drops, flash protests, and other public actions, they believe they can bypass the “controlled news and entertainment media” and establish a means of communicating with other white people. Their “creed can be summed up by fourfourfourfourteenteenteenteen simp simpsimpsimplelelele wor worworwordsdsdsds; we must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children.” Activity NJEHA spreads their hateful propaganda online and by distributing recruitment fliers in central New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Consequence of Neoconservative-Paleoconservative Disputes Within the Twentieth Century American Right William Conley Political Science
    Author Understanding the Call for an “Alternative Right” as a Consequence of Neoconservative-Paleoconservative Disputes within the Twentieth Century American Right William Conley Political Science William Conley began his Abstract research to fulfill a require- ment for a departmental his paper examines the origins of the “Alternative Right” or “Alt-Right” move- Honors thesis. To flesh out Tment in the United States through an analysis of the American conservative what he described as a “some- movement and the broader American Right of the twentieth century. I find that the what bookish, thesis,” William initial call for the creation of an “alternative Right” in 2008 was the result of ongoing also conducted a public opin- conflicts within American conservatism. These conflicts themselves have origins in ion survey. Throughout the the postwar “fusionist” transformation of the conservative movement, which inject- process, he came to enjoy ed Cold War interventionism into the previously isolationist American “Old Right.” exploring his topic in detail, This allowed the rise of the neoconservative wing of the Republican Party, which discovering something thrill- implanted stronger internationalist tendencies into a previously more isolationist ing about discovering trends in Right. In response, the so-called “paleoconservative” faction was formed, articulating history that could potentially an ideology more closely resembling the interwar Old Right. Viewed as having peak- explain current events. After ed with the 1992 presidential campaign of Patrick Buchanan, the paleoconservative graduation, William plans to philosopher Paul Gottfried would in 2008 call for a “post-paleo movement,” later pursue a graduate degree at rebranded as an “alternative Right.” Although the more recent “Alt-Right” term has UC Irvine and continue work- become associated with more than mere opposition to neoconservatism, this paper ing toward developing a career hopes to show that the act of its proposal can be seen as an attempt to create a in academia.
    [Show full text]
  • Permit Application 18-1166 Processing Correspondence
    Conversation Contents [EXTERNAL] Scheduling sweep for August 12th Rally Jason Kessler <[email protected]> From: Jason Kessler <[email protected]> Sent: Thu Jun 07 2018 08:15:46 GMT-0600 (MDT) To: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>, Amy Dailey <[email protected]>, CC: <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Scheduling sweep for August 12th Rally Sgt. Koehler, I want to go ahead and work out the schedule with you for the dog sweep on August 12th for the rally in Lafayette Park. As of right now our plan is to be in DC for the dog sweep at (b) (7)(A), (b) (7)(F). Is it possible to create a window of time in which we can reserve the dogs? For instance, if we got there later would we be able to do the sweep at (b) ? (7) Regards, Jason Kessler Permit # 18-1166 Conversation Contents 18-1166 "Frank, Cynthia" <[email protected]> From: "Frank, Cynthia" <[email protected]> Sent: Mon Jun 04 2018 08:49:49 GMT-0600 (MDT) To: Leonard Lee <[email protected]> Subject: 18-1166 Jason Kessler 434-(b) (6) Sent you an email on 30 May, 2018; hoping to speak with you. Cynthia Frank National Park Service NAMA Permits Management Division 900 Ohio Drive, SW Washington, DC 20024 202-245-4715 (o) 202-475-2216 (f) cynthia [email protected] “Keep close to Nature’s heart and break clear, once in a while, and climb a mountain or spend a week in the woods. Wash your spirit clean.” John Muir (1838-1914) Conversation Contents [EXTERNAL] Parade Application (August 12th Rally) Attachments: /5.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Hatred: Antisemitism on the Dark Web
    JCA 2019 DOI: 10.26613/jca/2.2.31 Dark Hatred: Antisemitism on the Dark Web Lev Topor Abstract Antisemitism is racism. While it is not broadly accepted in modern societies, it does exist in the margins, in places with no norms or regulations. The key purpose of this article is to develop a new conceptual research framework for the study of both antisemitism and racism. The dark web hosts a great deal of offensive and criminal activity; it also hosts racist and antisemitic activity. It is necessary, then, to search the dark web, the dank underbelly of society, for activity which is not accepted in conventional life. In order to make this conceptual research framework available to other researchers, an overview of racist antise- mitic activity on the dark web will be presented and analyzed. As concluded, governments do not take sufficient action for the eradication of dark web racism as it is hidden from society and is very difficult to regulate. In contrast to the surface web, racists, antisemites, thrive there. Keywords: Antisemitism, Racism, Dark Web, Deep Web INTRODUCTION and racism. If antisemitism will not simply Antisemitism is racism. Even if it is not widely vanish, it is necessary to search the margins of and publicly accepted in modern liberal soci- modern society, trace it, analyze it, and even- eties, it exists in the margins.1 Antisemitism is tually combat and abolish it. This article aims present in the far left’s and postcolonial left’s to present researchers with new concepts and assertions that the state of Israel has commit- methods to study racist and antisemitic phe- ted crimes;2 it is present in the alt-right, with nomena in the digital safehouses of bigots.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Department of Justice and the Rule of Law
    Report on the Department of Justice and the Rule of Law Under the Tenure of Attorney General William Barr Issue date: October 12, 2020 By Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law Ad Hoc Working Group in partnership with Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington Contents I. Description of Project, Methodology, and Working Group Members ............................. 3 II. Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 6 III. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 16 IV. Historical Background ........................................................................................................ 20 1. The Department of Justice and the Levi-Bell Reforms................................................ 20 2. William Barr’s Authoritarian Vision of Executive Power .......................................... 24 V. Issues in Barr’s Department of Justice .............................................................................. 28 1. DOJ’s Handling of the End of Special Counsel Mueller’s Investigation ................ 28 a. Barr’s Role in Oversight of Special Counsel Mueller’s Investigation ...................... 29 b. Barr’s Mischaracterization of the Mueller Report .................................................... 30 c. Excessive Redactions in the Released Version of the Mueller Report ..................... 31 2. DOJ’s Handling of the Ukraine Investigations
    [Show full text]