DOCSLIB.ORG

Permit 18-1166 Kessler Unite the Right

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) Additional Conditions Permit #18-1166 Organization: Unite the Right 2 Rally Person(s) In Charge: Jason Kessler & Samaria Ruiz Lafayette Park-Southwest Quadrant* August 12, 2018 (02:00 p.m.-09:00 p.m.) EVENT OVERVIEW: Participants (100-400) will assemble in Lafayette Park-Southwest Quadrant, to conduct a First Amendment demonstration, '~Protesting civil rights abuse in Charlottesville, VA/white civil rights rally." Participants will access the demonstration site via 17th Street and Pennsylvania A venue, NW. Activity in Lafayette Park will include speeches and the display of signs/placards and flags. Speakers include: Jason Kessler, Patrick Little, David Duke, Simon Roche, Kevin Cormier, Avi Horton, Corey Mahler and Tom Kawcyznki. Permittee has indicated that civil disobedience will not be a part of this demonstration. Permittee has also indicated that Neo Nazis and Antifa, may seek to disrupt, protest or prevent the demonstration. Jason Kessler, Samaria Ruiz, Mark Harriman and Al Stankard are the permit onsite coordinators. Time line: 02:00 p.m.-02:30 p.m. Deliveries/Security Check 02:30 p.m.-05:30 p.m. Setup in Lafayette Park-Southwest Quadrant/Assemble 05:30 p.m.-07 :30 p.m. Unite the Right Rally in Lafayette Park 07:45 p.m.-08:00 p.m. Proceed to 17th & Pennsylvania A venue & Disperse 07:30 p.m.-09:00 p.m. Tear down/Loadout/Cleanup/Depart Eguipment list: Flags & Flag Poles Two (2) Generators One (1) Stage (4' x 12' x 18") One (1) Cooler w/Three (3) Cases of Water One (1) Sound system w/Supporting Equipment (Speakers, Microphone & Mixer) Pursuant to 36 CFR 7.96(g)(4)(vii)(A), a fully executed application requesting the use of Lafayette Park, for the same time and place, has been received and a permit has been granted, authorizing activities which do reasonably permit the multiple occupancy of Lafayette Park. Subseguently, this permit authorizes the use of Lafayette Park-Southwest Quadrant*. Additional Conditions Permit #18-1166 Specific Conditions for Lafayette Park-Southwest Quadrant*: *NOTE: Due to the possibility of Presidential movements, and Head of State visits, permitted activity may be temporarily moved and/or suspended. *NOTE: All Staging/sound equipment utilized to support the event must be inspected by the United States Park Police (USPP). Permittee is responsible for contacting Sgt. Erich Koehler, U .S.P .P. (202) 610-7092, to coordinate the inspection prior to set up in Lafayette Park. (Inspection will be done at the intersection of 17th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.) *NOTE: All equipment must be hand carried/hand carted into the permitted area from 17th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. Permittee is responsible for contacting Metropolitan Police, (202) 671- 6522, to coordinate the use of this intersection for unloading/loading. *NOTE: Platform/stage must be at least (18 inches) off the ground and three of the four sides must be kept open for viewing at all times for security purposes. Coordination for any set up must be through Ms. Amy Dailey, Presidents Park, at (202) 208-1631. NPS regulations for Lafayette Park found at 36CFR §7.96(g) (5) (x), generally prohibits the erection, placement or use of structures of any kind except for the following: 1. When one hundred (100) or more persons are participating in a demonstration in the park, a temporary speaker's platform as is reasonably required to serve the demonstration participants is allowed as along as such platform is being erected, dismantled or used, provided that only one speaker's platform is allowed per demonstrating group, and provided further that such speaker's platform is authorized by a permit issued pursuant to paragraph (g) of36CFR §7.96. 2. The erection, placement or use of structures of any kind is prohibited. The term "structure" includes props and displays, such as coffins, crates, crosses, theaters, cages, and statues; furniture and furnishings, such as desks, chairs, tables, bookcases, cabinets, platforms, podiums, and lecterns; shelters, such as tents, boxes and other enclosures; wagons and carts; and all other similar types of property which might tend to harm park resources including aesthetic interests. 3. Special attention is drawn to item #7 from the Equipment List, concerning sound amplification. All sound amplification equipment shall be limited so that it will not unreasonably disturb nonparticipating persons in, or in the vicinity of, the area. Sound amplification cannot be directed towards the White House at any given time. 2 Additional Conditions Pennit #18-1166 4. The use of hand-carried signs are allowed regardless of size. 5. Permittee has requested the use of flags and flag poles as part of this demonstration. NOTE: Flags are treated as signs. As such, pursuant to 36 CFR 7.96 (g)(5)(ix)(B)(l) and 36 CFR 7. 96 (g)(5)(ix)(B)(2), signs that are not being hand-carried and that are no larger than four (4) feet in length, four (4) feet in width and one- quarter (1/4) inch in thickness (exclusive of braces that are reasonably required to meet support and safety requirements and that are not used so as to form an enclosure of two (2) or more sides) may be used in Lafayette Park, provided that no individual may have more than two (2) such signs in the park at any one time, and provided further that such signs must be attended at all times (the term "attended" is defined as an individual being within three (3) feet of his or her sign(s)), and provided further that such signs may not be elevated in a manner so as to exceed a height of six ( 6) feet above the ground at their highest point, may not be arranged or combined in a manner so as to exceed the size limitations set forth in this paragraph, and may not be arranged in such a fashion as to form an enclosure of two (2) or more sides. For example, under this provision, two four-feet by four-feet signs may not be combined so as to create a sign eight feet long and four feet wide, and three such signs may not be arranged to create a sign four feet long and twelve feet wide, and two or more signs of any size may not be leaned or otherwise placed together so as to form an enclosure of two or more sides, etc. 6. Balloons, glass bottles, and alcoholic beverages are prohibited on park land. 7. A hard copy of this permit must be made available upon request and Permittee must adhere to any and all instructions issued by the United States Park Police and/or by an official representative of President's Park. Additional General Permit Conditions: 8. All proposed amendments or additions to this permit and all proposed locations of vehicles, equipment, storage, installations of any kind, areas of activity, work and power plans shall be submitted to the NPS for prior written approval prior to the installation of facilities. These proposals shall be in map or diagram form suitable for on the ground inspection. 9. Permittee will provide an on-site coordinator to be accessible to the National Park Service and the United States Park Police personnel at all times during construction or set-up activities and during dismantling of facilities post-event. 10. The Permittee and the Permittee's contractors, may not load in any materials prior to the predetermined load in period as authorized by this permit. 3 Additional Conditions Permit #18-1166 11. Permittee is responsible for providing all necessary equipment/objects to conduct this activity. All equipment must be removed from park property immediately following the conclusion of the event. Items left on park property will be considered abandoned property and will not be the responsibility of the National Park Service. 12. Structures and/or equipment, not listed on the permit, are prohibited from entering the park. 13. Resource Protection: Throughout the course of this permit, the Permittee will require its employees/volunteers, and contractors, to exercise special care and attention to protect the resources of the National · Park Service, and their environs. In addition, Permittee must supervise their contractors and employees during set-up and teardown to assure that there is no damage to park resources. 14. Pursuant to 36 CFR 7.96(g)(5)(xii), the alteration, adaptation, damage or injuring, and/or removal of park resources or facilities are prohibited. No holes may be dug and no item, including signs or banners, may be attached to park trees, plantings, benches or other park property. 15. The Permittee shall insure that all facilities and structures placed on park property adhere to all applicable codes, standards, and regulations including but not limited to BOCA, OSHA, USPHS, NFPA-101, IBC 2006, IFC 2006 and ADA, covering requirements including but not limited to safe construction practices, grounding of generators and maintaining access to the Memorial. Permittee will submit stamped engineered drawings for all structures, i.e. cable trusses, tents, stages, audio and video towers, etc. for NPS review and approval. 16. Stages shall not be erected on/or over plants, planters, trees, tree wells, steps or statues. 17. Electricity: No electricity available on site. Permittee may provide own gasoline and/or solar powered generator(s) to provide power for tents, trailers, video and sound, towers and lighting. Generators will be installed in accordance with the site plan, D.C. Fire Department guidelines, and safely installed per manufacturer requirements. The fueling/refueling of gasoline powered generators on parkland is prohibited*. The storage of additional fuel is prohibited. At a minimum, for hand carted generators, l" professional outdoor grade plywood, or similar material must be placed underneath the generator to protect the underlying surfaces from potential weight and vibration damage and fluid leakage.
Recommended publications
  • The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: to Stop the Defamation of the Jewish People and to Secure Justice and Fair Treatment for All

    The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: to Stop the Defamation of the Jewish People and to Secure Justice and Fair Treatment for All

    A report from the Center on Extremism 09 18 New Hate and Old: The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment for all. ABOUT T H E CENTER ON EXTREMISM The ADL Center on Extremism (COE) is one of the world’s foremost authorities ADL (Anti-Defamation on extremism, terrorism, anti-Semitism and all forms of hate. For decades, League) fights anti-Semitism COE’s staff of seasoned investigators, analysts and researchers have tracked and promotes justice for all. extremist activity and hate in the U.S. and abroad – online and on the ground. The staff, which represent a combined total of substantially more than 100 Join ADL to give a voice to years of experience in this arena, routinely assist law enforcement with those without one and to extremist-related investigations, provide tech companies with critical data protect our civil rights. and expertise, and respond to wide-ranging media requests. Learn more: adl.org As ADL’s research and investigative arm, COE is a clearinghouse of real-time information about extremism and hate of all types. COE staff regularly serve as expert witnesses, provide congressional testimony and speak to national and international conference audiences about the threats posed by extremism and anti-Semitism. You can find the full complement of COE’s research and publications at ADL.org. Cover: White supremacists exchange insults with counter-protesters as they attempt to guard the entrance to Emancipation Park during the ‘Unite the Right’ rally August 12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Charlottesville: One Year Later

    Charlottesville: One Year Later

    Charlottesville: One Year Later Sections 1 Introduction 4 Unite the Right 2 2 The Charlottesville Backlash 5 White Supremacy Continues to Surge 3 Disunity and Division INTRODUCTION On August 11, 2017, the world watched in horror as hundreds of torch-wielding white supremacists descended on the University of Virginia campus, chanting, “Jews will not replace us!” The next day, the streets of Charlottesville exploded in violence, ringing with the racist shouts of th thththththeeee n nnneo-Nazis,eo-Nazis,eo-Nazis,eo-Nazis, Klan KlanKlanKlan m mmmembersembersembersembers an ananandddd alt altaltalt rightrightrightright agitat agitatagitatagitatorsorsorsors wh whwhwhoooo gath gathgathgathererereredededed in ininin an ananan unpr unprunprunprecedentedecedentedecedentedecedented sh shshshowowowow of ofofof unity unityunityunity. Their stated 1 / 9 common cause: To protest the removal of a Confederate statue from a local park. Their true purpose: To show to the world the strength and defiance of the white supremacist movement. The promise of Unite the Right, organized primarily by alt right activist Jason Kessler, brought white supremacists of all stripesstripesstripesstripes t tttogethogethogethogetherererer for forforfor a aaa week weekweekweekenenenendddd of ofofof prprprprotestotestotestotest that thatthatthat quickly quicklyquicklyquickly turn turnturnturnedededed t tttoooo vio viovioviolenlenlenlence,ce,ce,ce, culminating in the brutal murder of anti- racist counter-protester Heather Heyer. The white supremacist mayhem prevented the Saturday rally itself from actually occurring, as local and state police converged on the chaotic scene, urging everyone off the streets and away from the parks. Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe declared a state of emergency and authorities shut down Unite the Right. Despite this, high profile white supremacists like Richard Spencer and David Duke declardeclardeclardeclaredededed Unite UniteUniteUnite th thththeeee Right RightRightRight an ananan o ooovvvverallerallerallerall vict victvictvictororororyyyy.....
  • Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech Chloe M

    Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech Chloe M

    Brooklyn Law Review Volume 84 | Issue 1 Article 21 Fall 10-1-2018 Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech Chloe M. Gordils Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Chloe M. Gordils, Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech, 84 Brook. L. Rev. (2018). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol84/iss1/21 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Law Review by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. Google, Charlottesville, and the Need to Protect Private Employees’ Political Speech INTRODUCTION Consider that you are the owner of a popular hot dog eatery in Berkeley, California. One day in early August, after a long day of sausage sales, you return home and turn on the news, only to see the face of one of your employees participating in a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.1 The next day, a popular Twitter account releases a photo of your employee, mentioning your restaurant, and calling on you to terminate the employee. You find yourself in a tough position. On one hand, you are in charge of a private entity (the hot dog restaurant), with a reputation and legitimate business interests that could suffer due to your continued employment of a known neo-Nazi. On the other hand, you are a steadfast supporter of free speech, and have serious doubts about allowing a Twitter account to dictate your employee’s right to assert his or her sociopolitical views off the clock, while maintaining a job.
  • FUNDING HATE How White Supremacists Raise Their Money

    FUNDING HATE How White Supremacists Raise Their Money

    How White Supremacists FUNDING HATE Raise Their Money 1 RESPONDING TO HATE FUNDING HATE INTRODUCTION 1 SELF-FUNDING 2 ORGANIZATIONAL FUNDING 3 CRIMINAL ACTIVITY 9 THE NEW KID ON THE BLOCK: CROWDFUNDING 10 BITCOIN AND CRYPTOCURRENCIES 11 THE FUTURE OF WHITE SUPREMACIST FUNDING 14 2 RESPONDING TO HATE How White Supremacists FUNDING HATE Raise Their Money It’s one of the most frequent questions the Anti-Defamation League gets asked: WHERE DO WHITE SUPREMACISTS GET THEIR MONEY? Implicit in this question is the assumption that white supremacists raise a substantial amount of money, an assumption fueled by rumors and speculation about white supremacist groups being funded by sources such as the Russian government, conservative foundations, or secretive wealthy backers. The reality is less sensational but still important. As American political and social movements go, the white supremacist movement is particularly poorly funded. Small in numbers and containing many adherents of little means, the white supremacist movement has a weak base for raising money compared to many other causes. Moreover, ostracized because of its extreme and hateful ideology, not to mention its connections to violence, the white supremacist movement does not have easy access to many common methods of raising and transmitting money. This lack of access to funds and funds transfers limits what white supremacists can do and achieve. However, the means by which the white supremacist movement does raise money are important to understand. Moreover, recent developments, particularly in crowdfunding, may have provided the white supremacist movement with more fundraising opportunities than it has seen in some time. This raises the disturbing possibility that some white supremacists may become better funded in the future than they have been in the past.
  • Testimony of Lecia Brooks Chief of Staff, Southern Poverty Law Center

    Testimony of Lecia Brooks Chief of Staff, Southern Poverty Law Center

    Testimony of Lecia Brooks Chief of Staff, Southern Poverty Law Center before the Subcommittee on National Security, International Development and Monetary Policy Committee on Financial Services United States House of Representatives Dollars against Democracy: Domestic Terrorist Financing in the Aftermath of Insurrection February 25, 2021 My name is Lecia Brooks. I am chief of staff of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Now in our 50th year, the SPLC is a catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond, working in partnership with communities to dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people. SPLC lawyers have worked to shut down some of the nation’s most violent white supremacist groups by winning crushing, multimillion-dollar jury verdicts on behalf of their victims. We have helped dismantle vestiges of Jim Crow, reformed juvenile justice practices, shattered barriers to equality for women, children, the LGBTQ+ community, and the disabled, and worked to protect low-wage immigrant workers from exploitation. The SPLC began tracking white supremacist activity in the 1980s, during a resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan and other organized extremist hate groups. Today, the SPLC is the premier U.S. nonprofit organization monitoring the activities of domestic hate groups and other extremists. In the early 1990s, the SPLC launched its pioneering Teaching Tolerance program to provide educators with free, anti-bias classroom resources, such as classroom documentaries and lesson plans. Now renamed Learning For Justice, our program reaches millions of schoolchildren with award-winning curricula and other materials that promote understanding of our nation’s history and respect for others, helping educators create inclusive, equitable school environments.
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the WESTERN DISTRICT of VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division

    IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the WESTERN DISTRICT of VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division JASON KESSLER, ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 3:17-cv-00056-GEC V. ) ) CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE and ) MAURICE JONES, ) Defendants. ) BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER NOW COME the Defendants, by counsel, and submit the following Brief in opposition to the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order filed by Plaintiff Jason Kessler. Introduction The Plaintiff in this action is seeking to compel the City of Charlottesville to allow a massive demonstration in Emancipation Park, a small urban park located in Downtown Charlottesville.1 While the original application for the demonstration submitted by the Plaintiff, who is the event organizer, stated that there would be 400 attendees, the projected number of 1 While suing the City for permission to use the Park, the Plaintiff apparently feels that injunctive relief from the Court is not necessary. After announcing on his Twitter account that this lawsuit to “reinstate” his permit had been filed, he tweeted that “We go either way”. Case 3:17-cv-00056-GEC Document 10 Filed 08/11/17 Page 1 of 19 Pageid#: 97 both demonstrators and counter-demonstrators has increased dramatically over the past month, due largely to the internet-based marketing efforts by the Plaintiff. While he has submitted supplemental requests to the City for the rally since his initial application2, he has never bothered to update or revise the outdated estimate of 400 people. The City‘s conservative estimate of the number of individuals attending the rally is no less than 1,000, with as many as 2,000 or more counter-demonstrators in attendance.
  • Adopt a Resolution to Denounce and Oppose White Nationalist and Neo-Nazi Groups Including Their Actions

    Adopt a Resolution to Denounce and Oppose White Nationalist and Neo-Nazi Groups Including Their Actions

    Page 1 of 7 Cheryl Davila Councilmember District 2 CONSENT CALENDAR February 26, 2019 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Councilmembers Cheryl Davila, Ben Bartlett, Kate Harrison and Mayor Jesse Arreguin Subject: Adopt a resolution to denounce and oppose white nationalist and neo-Nazi groups including their actions. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution denouncing and opposing white nationalist and neo-Nazi groups including their actions. POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION On February 4, 2019, the Agenda and Rules Committee adopted the following action: M/S/C (Arreguin/Wengraf) to send the item to the full Council with a Positive Recommendation. Vote: All Ayes. FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION No general fund impact. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY No ecological impact. BACKGROUND According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, “white nationalist groups espouse white supremacist or white separatist ideologies, often focusing on the alleged inferiority of nonwhites. Groups listed in a variety of other categories - Ku Klux Klan, neo- Page 2 of 7 Confederate, neo-Nazi, racist skinhead, and Christian Identity - could also be fairly described as white nationalist.”1 As documented in the November 3, 2018 cover article of the New York Times Magazine, since 9/11, U.S. counter-terrorism policy has focused almost entirely on combating American and foreign-born “jihadists,” failing to recognize the growing threat of far-right extremism. This has contributed to widespread vigilante attacks on, government surveillance and repression of, and sweeping policies that discriminate against Muslim, Arab and South Asian communities. Meanwhile, it has failed to address the growing threat and presence of white nationalists and neo-Nazis across the U.S.2 As Janet Reitman’s article documents, according to the data, far-right extremists have killed more people since 9/11 than any other category of domestic terrorism.
  • Computational Propaganda, Jewish-Americans and the 2018 Midterms

    Computational Propaganda, Jewish-Americans and the 2018 Midterms

    A report from the Center on Technology and Society OCT 2018 Computational Propaganda, Jewish-Americans and the 2018 Midterms: The Amplification of Anti-Semitic Harassment Online Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all. ABOUT CENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY AND THE BELFER FELLOWS In a world riddled with cyberhate, online harassment, and misuses of ADL (Anti-Defamation technology, the Center for Technology & Society (CTS) serves as a resource League) fights anti-Semitism to tech platforms and develops proactive solutions. Launched in 2017 and and promotes justice for all. headquartered in Silicon Valley, CTS aims for global impacts and applications in an increasingly borderless space. It is a force for innovation, producing Join ADL to give a voice to cutting-edge research to enable online civility, protect vulnerable populations, those without one and to support digital citizenship, and engage youth. CTS builds on ADL’s century of protect our civil rights. experience building a world without hate and supplies the tools to make that a possibility both online and off-line. Learn more: adl.org The Belfer Fellowship program supports CTS’s efforts to create innovative solutions to counter online hate and ensure justice and fair treatment for all in the digital age through fellowships in research and outreach projects. The program is made possible by a generous contribution from the Robert A. and Renée E. Belfer Family Foundation. The inaugural 2018-2019 Fellows are: • Rev. Dr. Patricia Novick, Ph.D., of the Multicultural Leadership Academy, a program that brings Latino and African-American leaders together.
  • The Fringe Insurgency Connectivity, Convergence and Mainstreaming of the Extreme Right

    The Fringe Insurgency Connectivity, Convergence and Mainstreaming of the Extreme Right

    The Fringe Insurgency Connectivity, Convergence and Mainstreaming of the Extreme Right Jacob Davey Julia Ebner About this paper About the authors This report maps the ecosystem of the burgeoning Jacob Davey is a Researcher and Project Coordinator at ‘new’ extreme right across Europe and the US, which is the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), overseeing the characterised by its international outlook, technological development and delivery of a range of online counter- sophistication, and overtures to groups outside of the extremism initiatives. His research interests include the traditional recruitment pool for the extreme-right. This role of communications technologies in intercommunal movement is marked by its opportunistic pragmatism, conflict, the use of internet culture in information seeing movements which hold seemingly contradictory operations, and the extreme-right globally. He has ideologies share a bed for the sake of achieving provided commentary on the extreme right in a range common goals. It examines points of connectivity of media sources including The Guardian, The New York and collaboration between disparate groups and Times and the BBC. assesses the interplay between different extreme-right movements, key influencers and subcultures both Julia Ebner is a Research Fellow at the Institute for online and offline. Strategic Dialogue (ISD) and author of The Rage: The Vicious Circle of Islamist and Far-Right Extremism. Her research focuses on extreme right-wing mobilisation strategies, cumulative extremism and European terrorism prevention initiatives. She advises policy makers and tech industry leaders, regularly writes for The Guardian and The Independent and provides commentary on broadcast media, including the BBC and CNN. © ISD, 2017 London Washington DC Beirut Toronto This material is offered free of charge for personal and non-commercial use, provided the source is acknowledged.
  • Prosecuting Domestic Terrorism

    Prosecuting Domestic Terrorism

    Boston College Law Review Volume 61 Issue 1 Article 8 1-29-2020 Our Inner Demons: Prosecuting Domestic Terrorism Michael Molstad Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legislation Commons, and the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael Molstad, Our Inner Demons: Prosecuting Domestic Terrorism, 61 B.C.L. Rev. 339 (2020), https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol61/iss1/8 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OUR INNER DEMONS: PROSECUTING DOMESTIC TERRORISM Abstract: The United States does not currently have a uniform framework for how it handles domestic terrorism. Although there is a terrorism section of the criminal code that criminalizes certain actions that are deemed terroristic, these laws are applied disproportionately to those with an Islamic ideology. Political motivations and protectionist interests within the United States tend to prevent similar crimes committed in the name of, for example, right-wing terrorism to be convicted under the terrorism section of the criminal code. In light of the threat posed by domestic terrorism and other trends in the political and cultural ethos, the current state of the law is inadequate to address the problem and unjustly places a stigma on one subsection of the population.
  • In the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Charlottesville Division

    In the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Charlottesville Division

    08/12/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION DEANDRE HARRIS, § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. § ________________________3:19CV00046 JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER § VANGUARD AMERICA, ANDREW § ANGLIN MOONBASE HOLDINGS, LLC, § ROBERT “AZZMADOR” RAY, § NATHAN DAMIGO, ELLIOT KLINE § AKA ELI MOSLEY, IDENTITY EVROPA, § MATTHEW HEIMBACH, MATTHEW § PARROT AKA DAVID MATTHEW § PARROTT, TRADITIONALIST WORKERS § PARTY , MICHAEL HILL, MICHAEL § TUBBS, LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH, § JEFF SCHOEP, NATIONAL SOCIALIST § MOVEMENT, NATIONALIST FRONT, § AUGUSTUS SOL INVICTUS, § FRATERNAL § ORDER OF THE ALT-KNIGHTS, § MICHAEL “ENOCH” PEINOVICH, § LOYAL WHITE KNIGHTS OF THE § KU KLUX KLAN, § AND EAST COAST KNIGHTS OF THE § KU KLUX KLAN AKA EAST COAST § KNIGHTS OF THE TRUE INVISIBLE § EMPIRE, NATIONAL POLICY INSTITUTE, § THE PROUD BOYS, COUNCIL OF § CONSERVATIVE CITIZENS, AMERICAN § RENAISSANCE, THE RED ELEPHANTS, § AMERICAN FREEDOM KEEPERS, § ALTRIGHT.COM, § DANIEL P. BORDEN, § JURY TRIAL ALEX MICHAEL RAMOS, § JACOB SCOTT GOODWIN, § TYLER WATKINS DAVIS, § JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 § Defendants. § DeAndre Harris v. Jason Kessler, et al Page 1 of 25 Case 3:19-cv-00046-NKM Document 1 Filed 08/12/19 Page 1 of 25 Pageid#: 28 PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Plaintiff, DeAndre Harris, by his undersigned attorney alleges upon knowledge as to himself and his own actions and upon information and belief as to all the other matters, as follows: I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action brought by the Plaintiff against the Defendants for violation of Plaintiff’s individual rights to be free from assault and battery, and, consequently, in violation of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
  • Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right

    Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right

    Maik Fielitz, Nick Thurston (eds.) Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right Political Science | Volume 71 Maik Fielitz, Nick Thurston (eds.) Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US With kind support of Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Na- tionalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No- Derivatives 4.0 (BY-NC-ND) which means that the text may be used for non-commer- cial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ To create an adaptation, translation, or derivative of the original work and for com- mercial use, further permission is required and can be obtained by contacting [email protected] Creative Commons license terms for re-use do not apply to any content (such as graphs, figures, photos, excerpts, etc.) not original to the Open Access publication and further permission may be required from the rights holder. The obligation to research and clear permission lies solely with the party re-using the material. © 2019 transcript Verlag, Bielefeld Cover layout: Kordula Röckenhaus, Bielefeld Typeset by Alexander Masch, Bielefeld Printed by Majuskel Medienproduktion GmbH, Wetzlar Print-ISBN 978-3-8376-4670-2 PDF-ISBN 978-3-8394-4670-6 https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839446706 Contents Introduction | 7 Stephen Albrecht, Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston ANALYZING Understanding the Alt-Right.