DOCSLIB.ORG

David Rittenhouse: Modern Mathematician

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
David Rittenhouse: Modern Mathematician David Rittenhouse: Modern Mathematician David E. Zitarelli n the surface it seems implausible that a colonial scientist could be characterized as a mathematician by today’s standards. Yet the single aim of this note is to provide evidence that Otwo of David Rittenhouse’s papers from 220 years ago qualify him as a modern analyst. Rittenhouse (1732–1796) had no formal edu- cation and never earned a degree. Except for a brief appointment as professor of astronomy at the University of Pennsylvania, he never held an academic position. Yet he became one of America’s leading colonial scientists. Rittenhouse can be regarded as a modern mathematician in three ways. For one, his research on the transit of Venus of 1769 was financed by a governmental agency (the Colony of Pennsylvania) for the first time in American history, setting an early precedent for NSF grants. For another, much like Oswald Veblen in World War I, he aided a war effort by refining the ballistics of rifles and cannons as well as locating forts to Gallery—public domain. “David Rittenhouse” by Charles Wilson Peale—Smithsonian National Portrait maximize defenses for General Washington. But David Rittenhouse the main reason is because of two papers he read at scientific meetings and subsequently published in that society’s Transactions. A close reading of these papers would label him an analyst—even, project he was investigating: to determine the times perhaps, a numerical analyst—today. of vibration of a pendulum. However, he stated a philosophy embraced by many mathematicians Analyst today: “I was induced to attempt the means of doing this solely by its usefulness, but in prosecuting the Rittenhouse read the paper “A method of finding the sum of the several powers of the sines” at a enquiry I found much of that pleasing regularity, monthly meeting of the American Philosophical the discovery of which the geometrician often Society (APS) in May 1792, a month after turning thinks a sufficient reward for his labours” [2, sixty. Its introduction reveals the source of the p. 155]. The “pleasing regularity” can be seen in the bottom half of Figure 1. The first two cases 2 David E. Zitarelli is emeritus professor of mathematics at reveal formulas for the sums of sin and sin in the Temple University. His email address is [email protected]. first quadrant. Here the old English way of writing DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/noti1197 the letter “s” is suggestive because the first letter January 2015 Notices of the AMS 11 resembles an integral sign. Thus by “the sum of the Table 1. sines” Rittenhouse was appealing to areas under their curves which, in modern terms, become the N Sum two formulas 1 1 Z π=2 2 π=2 (1) sin x dx = 1 3 2/3 0 4 3π=16 and 5 8/15 Z π=2 π 6 5π=32 (2) sin2 x dx = : 0 4 7 16/35 Throughout this section I restrict the radius of the 8 35π=256 circle to be r = 1; it is a simple exercise to extend these formulas to Rittenhouse’s expression, with Based on today’s methods for evaluating R some care. For instance, in all even-numbered cases sinn x dx by trigonometric identities, we know “the arch of 90◦” means the circumference of the R π=2 1 π that these cases must be taken in pairs, because first quadrant of a circle, so sin2 x dx = × . 0 2 2 those identities differ according to the parity of n. Rittenhouse indicated his methods on the right In symbols, for the sum of sinn the index is n, so side of Figure 1. Thus he proved the first two cases n−1 the multiplier is n . By interpreting “the next but “By Demonstration,” meaning he was in possession one lower power” as n − 2, we arrive at the formula of proofs by synthetic geometry. Without saying Z π=2 n − 1 Z π=2 so, he left the proofs as an exercise for the reader. sinn x dx = sinn−2 x dx: Similarly, Rittenhouse stated that he obtained 0 n 0 formulas for the next four cases “By Infinite Rittenhouse, it seems, had discovered this recursion Series.” It is therefore impressive that he was formula unaware that “Wallis’s formulas” were R π=2 n able to evaluate 0 sin x dx for n = 3; 4; 5; 6 by discovered by the English mathematician John this method, but it is equally tantalizing because, Wallis around 1655. once again, he provided no proofs. Moreover, The title of the printed version of the paper Rit- Rittenhouse was a taciturn, introverted individual tenhouse delivered begins “Dr. Rittenhouse to Mr. who corresponded infrequently and left few notes Patterson.” Rittenhouse concluded by beseeching behind, so we have nary a hint as to how he proved, University of Pennsylvania mathematician Robert for example, that Patterson, “Should your leisure permit you to give any attention to this subject I shall be glad to see Z π=2 5π sin6 x dx = : you furnish a demonstration for the 3d, or any 0 32 subsequent case abovementioned [sic].” Neither his file in the APS archives nor corre- The discovery of this recursion formula shows spondence with Thomas Jefferson reveals any that Rittenhouse was a modern mathematician evidence. in practice as well as in spirit. His only other If we are left feeling empty for lack of proofs, paper devoted strictly to pure mathematics looks Rittenhouse felt equally frustrated, though for a to contain little more than brute-force arithmetic different reason. He wrote, “I have not been able computations, but a closer examination reveals a strictly to demonstrate any more than the first much deeper algorithm. two cases.” This statement places him squarely in the eighteenth century, a time when proofs by Numerical Analyst Euclidean geometry set the standard. David Rittenhouse was sufficiently inspired by Rittenhouse obtained the two cases n = 7, n = 8 his progress to investigate other mathematical “By the Law of Continuation,” called induction problems for their own sake. In August 1795, today. Table 1 summarizes the eight cases. It is not after succeeding Benjamin Franklin as president particularly straightforward to see how to induce of the APS, he read the paper “Method of raising the results for n = 7 and n = 8 from the first six [evaluating] the common logarithm of any number cases. (Spoiler alert: I am about to state the rule. immediately” at an APS meeting. It was published Inquisitive readers are encouraged to attempt this posthumously in 1799 [3]. problem independently.) Rittenhouse wrote: “The The late Jesuit priest Frederick A. Homann law is this, make a fraction whose denominator is (1929–2011) described this paper in [1], illustrating the index of the given power, and its numerator the the Rittenhouse algorithm by evaluating log N same index, diminished by unit…; by this fraction for N = 20. A cursory glance at the massive multiply the sum of the next but one lower power, columns of calculations in Rittenhouse’s paper and we have the form of the given power.” suggests why Homann chose N = 20—it simplifies 12 Notices of the AMS Volume 62, Number 1 t56 POWERS OF TH~ SIN I S. the ultimate ratio which the furn of the given power of the fines bears to a known power of the radius. Having proceeded fo .far as the 6th power the law of continuation became evident; fo that, !hould any problem 1n mathematical philofophy require it, we may proceed as far as we pleafe in furn ming the powers of the fines. The law is this, Make a fraction whofe denominator is the index of the given power, and its numerator the fame index, diminiih­ ed by unity, and multiplied by the fquare of the radius; by this frall:ion multiply the furn ot the next but one lower power, and we-have the fom of the given power. Thus I ft, the furn of the I fi power of the fines l B . is= rr, or the fquare of the radius , ~ y 0 cmon 2d, furn of the 2d, power or fquares IS firation. = ~ rrx by the arch of 90°. J 3d, furn of the 3d, power or cubes ~s l ~ rr of the 1 ft, or =.;. r~ · I 4th. furn of 4th powers is =~rr of the 2d 4 B fi. or=~• r · x by the arch. of 90°. LI y ·rn n1te 5th, furn of 5lh. powers is=-}rr of the 3d, , Seriea. or = --\ -rr, J 6th, fum of 6th. ·powers is-. i-rr ofthe4th or= .-S6 r~ x by arch of 90°. 7th, furn of 7th. powers is=~rr of the 5th, l Or --,rs- 6r8· J· By . the Law of 8th, furn of8th. powers is=-~rr of the 6th, Continuation. or=,i{- r~ x by the arch of 90°. &c. &.c. ·Should your Ieifure permit you to gi v~ any ·attention to this fobjelt I fhall be glad to fee you furntili a de~onftra­ tion for the 3J, or any fubfequent cafe abovemenuoned. I am, Sir, Your moft obedient humble fervant, DAVID RITTENB.OUSE. Index Figure 1 calculations enormously. Yet this simplification then the continued fraction [n0; n1; n2;:::], where belies Rittenhouse’s numerical dexterity, so I will N Q Q =10;Q = ;Q = k−1 for k = 0; 1; 2;::: adapt Homann’s approach to approximate log 99, −1 0 C k+1 nk 10 Qk the case Rittenhouse exhibited in his paper. Figure 1 Rittenhouse began by calculating the character- and nk is the largest integer for which Qk+1 ≥ 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mathematics Is a Gentleman's Art: Analysis and Synthesis in American College Geometry Teaching, 1790-1840 Amy K
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2000 Mathematics is a gentleman's art: Analysis and synthesis in American college geometry teaching, 1790-1840 Amy K. Ackerberg-Hastings Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Higher Education and Teaching Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Ackerberg-Hastings, Amy K., "Mathematics is a gentleman's art: Analysis and synthesis in American college geometry teaching, 1790-1840 " (2000). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 12669. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/12669 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margwis, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. in the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL 50CIETY MONTGOMERY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA J\Roi^RISTOWN
    BULLETIN joffAe- HISTORICAL 50CIETY MONTGOMERY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA J\rOI^RISTOWN £omery PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY AT IT5 R00M5 IS EAST PENN STREET NORRI5TOWN.PA. OCTOBER, 1939 VOLUME II NUMBER 1 PRICE 50 CENTS Historical Society of Montgomery County OFFICERS Nelson P. Fegley, Esq., President S. Cameron Corson, First Vice-President Mrs. John Faber Miller, Second Vice-President Charles Harper Smith, Third Vice-President Mrs. Rebecca W. Brecht, Recording Secretary Ella Slinglupp, Corresponding Secretary Annie B. Molony, Financial Secretary Lyman a. Kratz, Treasurer Emily K. Preston, Librarian TRUSTEES Franklin A. Stickler, Chairman Mrs. A. Conrad Jones Katharine Preston H. H. Ganser Floyd G. Frederick i David Rittenhouse THE BULLETIN of the Historical Society of Montgomery County Published Semi-Anrvmlly — October and April Volume II October, 1939 Number 1 CONTENTS Dedication of the David Rittenhouse Marker, June 3, 1939 3 David Rittenhouse, LL.D., F.R.S. A Study from ContemporarySources, Milton Rubincam 8 The Lost Planetarium of David Ritten house James K. Helms 31 The Weberville Factory Charles H. Shaw 35 The Organization of Friends Meeting at Norristown Helen E. Richards 39 Map Making and Some Maps of Mont gomery County Chester P. Cook 51 Bible Record (Continued) 57 Reports 65 Publication Committee Dr. W. H. Reed, Chairman Charles R. Barker Hannah Gerhard Chester P. Cook Bertha S. Harry Emily K. Preston, Editor 1 Dedication of the David Rittenhouse Marker June 3, 1939 The picturesque farm of Mr. Herbert T. Ballard, Sr., on Germantown Pike, east of Fairview Village, in East Norriton township, was the scene of a notable gathering, on June 3, 1939, the occasion being the dedication by the Historical So ciety of Montgomery County of the marker commemorating the observation of the transit of Venus by the astronomer, David Rittenhouse, on nearby ground, and on the same month and day, one hundred and seventy years before.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republican Theology of Benjamin Rush
    THE REPUBLICAN THEOLOGY OF BENJAMIN RUSH By DONALD J. D'ELIA* A Christian [Benjamin Rush argued] cannot fail of be- ing a republican. The history of the creation of man, and of the relation of our species to each other by birth, which is recorded in the Old Testament, is the best refuta- tion that can be given to the divine right of kings, and the strongest argument that can be used in favor of the original and natural equality of all mankind. A Christian, I say again, cannot fail of being a republican, for every precept of the Gospel inculcates those degrees of humility, self-denial, and brotherly kindness, which are directly opposed to the pride of monarchy and the pageantry of a court. D)R. BENJAMIN RUSH was a revolutionary in his concep- tions of history, society, medicine, and education. He was also a revolutionary in theology. His age was one of universality, hle extrapolated boldly from politics to religion, or vice versa, with the clear warrant of the times.1 To have treated religion and politics in isolation from each other would have clashed with his analogical disposition, for which he was rightly famous. "Dr. D'Elia is associate professor of history at the State University of New York College at New Paltz. This paper was read at a session of the annual meeting of the Association at Meadville, October 9, 1965. 1Basil Willey, The Eighteenth Century Background; Studies on the Idea of Nature in the Thought of the Period (Boston: Beacon Press, 1961), p. 137 et passim.
    [Show full text]
  • The Misunderstood Philosophy of Thomas Paine
    THE MISUNDERSTOOD PHILOSOPHY OF THOMAS PAINE A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of History Jason Kinsel December, 2015 THE MISUNDERSTOOD PHILOSOPHY OF THOMAS PAINE Jason Kinsel Thesis Approved: Accepted: ______________________________ _____________________________ Advisor Dean of the College Dr. Walter Hixson Dr. Chand Midha ______________________________ ______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Martino-Trutor Dr. Chand Midha ______________________________ ______________________________ Department Chair Date Dr. Martin Wainwright ii ABSTRACT The name Thomas Paine is often associated with his political pamphlet Common Sense. The importance of “Common Sense” in regards to the American Revolution has been researched and debated by historians, political scientists, and literary scholars. While they acknowledge that Paine’s ideas and writing style helped to popularize the idea of separation from Great Britain in 1776, a thorough analysis of the entirety of Paine’s philosophy has yet to be completed. Modern scholars have had great difficulty with categorizing works such as, The Rights of Man, Agrarian Justice, and Paine’s Dissertation on First Principles of Government. Ultimately, these scholars feel most comfortable with associating Paine with the English philosopher John Locke. This thesis will show that Paine developed a unique political philosophy that is not only different from Locke’s in style, but fundamentally opposed to the system of government designed by Locke in his Second Treatise of Government. Furthermore, I will provide evidence that Paine’s contemporary’s in the American Colonies and Great Britain vehemently denied that Paine’s ideas resembled those of Locke in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA DEMOCRACY in TROUBLE: OAS to the RESCUE? LALS 328/PSCI 328 Professor: Cathy Bartch, Ph.D. Class T
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA DEMOCRACY IN TROUBLE: OAS TO THE RESCUE? LALS 328/PSCI 328 Professor: Cathy Bartch, Ph.D. Class Times: TH 4:30-6 [email protected] Class Location: David Rittenhouse Laboratory ph: 215-898-9919, 267-475-2467 (cell) DRLB 3N1H Teaching Assistant: Maria Francesca Arruda 209 S. 33rd Street de Amaral (*Subject to change from week to week) [email protected] Office Hours: Fri (4-5) 215-582-4082 Office Location: 411 McNeil, 3718 Locust Walk Or at a time that is convenient COURSE DESCRIPTION: Democracy in the Americas is in trouble. Entrenched political, economic, and social inequality, combined with environmental degradation, weak institutions, pervasive health epidemics, weapon proliferation, and other pressing issues pose formidable challenges for strengthening democratic ideals and institutions. The Organization of the American States (OAS), the world’s oldest regional organization, is uniquely poised to confront these challenges and is purposively focused to “strengthen the peace and security” and “promote and consolidate representative democracy” (among a host of other goals set forth in its Charter) across the continent. However, to what extent does the OAS ameliorate destructive conditions such as low levels of participation, extreme poverty, illegal arms trade, human rights abuses, among other problems related to democracy, development, security, and human rights, the organization’s main pillars? In this course, students will delve into the role, history, and workings of the OAS and its political, economic, and societal impact in the region while working directly with Penn undergraduates in preparation for the OAS’ annual high school model OAS simulation in Washington, DC.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Polite Eighteenth Century, 1750–1806 A
    AMERICAN SCIENCE AND THE PURSUIT OF “USEFUL KNOWLEDGE” IN THE POLITE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY, 1750–1806 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Elizabeth E. Webster Christopher Hamlin, Director Graduate Program in History and Philosophy of Science Notre Dame, Indiana April 2010 © Copyright 2010 Elizabeth E. Webster AMERICAN SCIENCE AND THE PURSUIT OF “USEFUL KNOWLEDGE” IN THE POLITE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY, 1750–1806 Abstract by Elizabeth E. Webster In this thesis, I will examine the promotion of science, or “useful knowledge,” in the polite eighteenth century. Historians of England and America have identified the concept of “politeness” as a key component for understanding eighteenth-century culture. At the same time, the term “useful knowledge” is also acknowledged to be a central concept for understanding the development of the early American scientific community. My dissertation looks at how these two ideas, “useful knowledge” and “polite character,” informed each other. I explore the way Americans promoted “useful knowledge” in the formative years between 1775 and 1806 by drawing on and rejecting certain aspects of the ideal of politeness. Particularly, I explore the writings of three central figures in the early years of the American Philosophical Society, David Rittenhouse, Charles Willson Peale, and Benjamin Rush, to see how they variously used the language and ideals of politeness to argue for the promotion of useful knowledge in America. Then I turn to a New Englander, Thomas Green Fessenden, who identified and caricatured a certain type of man of science and satirized the late-eighteenth-century culture of useful knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Discourse and the Pennsylvania Constitution, 1776 - 1790
    Virtuous Democrats, Liberal Aristocrats: Political Discourse and the Pennsylvania Constitution, 1776 - 1790 Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie im Fachbereich 10 – Neuere Philologien der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität zu Frankfurt am Main vorgelegt von Thomas W. Clark aus Frankfurt am Main 2001 If we can agree where the liberty and freedom of the people lies, that will do all. - Colonel Ireton, The Putney Debates But, notwithstanding this almost unanimous agreement in favour of liberty, neither were all disposed to go the same lenghts for it, nor were they perfectly in unison in the idea annexed to it. - Alexander Graydon, Memoirs of a Life, Chiefly passed in Pennsylvania Fraud lurks in generals. There is not a more unintelligible word in the English language than republicanism. - John Adams to Mercy Otis Warren CONTENTS PREFACE vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xi 1. PART I REVOLUTIONARY PARADIGMS 1.1 Ex Uno Plures or The American Revolution as a Discourse Community 1 1.1.1 Truth and Difference, Republicans and Scholars 1 1.1.2 Revolutionary Pennsylvania as a Discourse Community 18 1.2 Revolutionary Ideology between Republicanism and Liberalism 36 1.2.1 Liberalism Versus Republicanism 36 1.2.2 Classical Republicanism 42 1.2.3 Liberalism 55 1.2.4 Transformation, Opposition, Permeation 61 1.3 Social as Political Conflict: The Few, the Many, the People 75 1.3.1 Rhetoric, Reality, and Radicalism 75 1.3.2 The Discourse of Popular Sovereignty 87 1.3.3 Limiting and Affirming the People: an Exemplary Analysis 96 1.4 Deference to Diversity: Politics and Society in Pennsylvania 105 1.4.1 Quaker Conflict and Hegemony 107 1.4.2 Ethnocultural Pluralism, Sectionalism and the Politics of Heterogeneity 115 1.4.3 Social Diversity and the Emergence of Popular Radicalism 124 1.4.4 Power Struggles, 1776-1790 136 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Newtonian Epoch in the American Colonies (1680-1783) by Fkedeeick E
    314 American Antiquarian Society [Oct., THE NEWTONIAN EPOCH IN THE AMERICAN COLONIES (1680-1783) BY FKEDEEICK E. BRASCH ISTORY in its constant recording of events of H human experience moves on steadily and per- sistently. However certain is the course of history, it is nevertheless a varied series of epochs, events, or com- bination of experiences. It is therefore of vital concern from an intellectual point of view that a retrospective and introspective attitude be maintained in order to see how life as it is today has been achieved. From our present position in the course of events, we are con- cerned today with one of the great periods of the past movement. It is a small section to be sure, but a most interesting and timely one. Between the years of 1680 and 1720 in English history, under the rule of William III and Queen Anne, a most brilliant and illuminating intellectual life is reported. England virtually assumed undisputed leadership only to share it later, first with France and then with Germany. In this period England gave to history her best, both in science and philosophy. The accumulated wisdom of the ages seems to have been concentrated in the lives and works of two undis- putedly brilliant minds, Isaac Newton and John Locke. Theirs are beyond question the outstanding names in that epoch, which followed the discoveries and the liberations of the Renaissance and the Reform- ation, and preceded the great mathematical, physical and philosophical discoveries of today. In one sense Newton and Locke were systematizers of ideas which were prevalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania History (People, Places, Events) Record Holdings Scholars in Residence Pennsylvania History Day People Places Events Things
    rruVik.. reliulsyiVUtlll L -tiestuly ratge I UI I Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission Home Programs & Events Researchr Historic Sites & Museums Records Management About Us Historic Preservation Pennsylvania State Archives CRGIS: Cultural Resources Geographic Information Doc Heritage Digital Archives (ARIAS) 0OF ExplorePAhistory.com V Land Records things Genealogy Pennsylvania History (People, Places, Events) Record Holdings Scholars in Residence Pennsylvania History Day People Places Events Things Documentary Heritaae Pennsylvania Governors Symbols and Official Designations Examples: " Keystone State," Flower, Tree Penn-sylyania Counties Outline of Pennsylvania History 1, n-n. II, ni, tv, c.tnto ~ no Ii~, ol-, /~~h nt/n. mr. on, ,t on~~con A~2 1 .rrniV1%', reiniSy1Vdaina riiSiur'y ragcaeiuo I ()I U Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission lome Programs & Events Research Historic Sites & Museums Records Management About Us Historic Preservation Pennsylvania State Archives PENNSYLVANIA STATE CRGIS: Cultural Resources Geographic Information HISTO RY Doc Heritage Digital Archives (ARIAS) ExplorePAhistory.com Land Records THE QUAKER PROVINCE: 1681-1776 Genealogy Pennsylvania History . (People, Places, Events) Record Holdings Y Scholars in Residence Pennsylvania History Day The Founding of Pennsylvania William Penn and the Quakers Penn was born in London on October 24, 1644, the son of Admiral Sir William Penn. Despite high social position and an excellent education, he shocked his upper-class associates by his conversion to the beliefs of the Society of Friends, or Quakers, then a persecuted sect. He used his inherited wealth and rank to benefit and protect his fellow believers. Despite the unpopularity of his religion, he was socially acceptable in the king's court because he was trusted by the Duke of York, later King James II.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Record of David Rittenshouse
    M] \?l CS 7/ Km IBH7 » 1/ ;;:,¦ '.; FAMILY - ¦¦'" ¦" U firrHiAs rittenhqlM THE FAMILY RECORD OF DAVID RITTENBOUSE INCLUDING HIS SISTERS ESTHER, ANNE AND ELEANOR. ALSO, BENJAMIN RITTENHOUSE AND MARGARET RITTENHOUSE MORGAN BY DANIEL K.CASSEL OF GERMANTOWN, PHILADELPHIA, PA. I NORRISTOWN, PA. : HERALD PRINTING AND BINDING ROOMS. 1897. B *v* v p3 I ELIZABETH RITTENHOUSE SERGEANT. 5 DAVID RITTENHOUSE. CHILDREN OF No. 38. VOL. I. DAVID RITTENHOUSE*, of Matthias3, of Nicho­ las 2,ofWilliam1". 7 Indiridutl Family Gra. No. No.' 5 4200 1 Elizabeth Rittenkouse,b. about 1767; m. Jonathan Dickinson Sergeant, Esq., of Philadelphia, at the close of the year 1788 ;it was his second marriage. Mr.Jonathan Dickinson Sergeant was an eminent lawyer in Philadelphia, and for some time Attorney General of Penn­ sylvania ;he was one of the fivepersons delegated on the 20th of February, 1776, by the convention of New Jersey (where he then resided) to represent that colony in Congress. His col­ leagues were the late Governor Livingstone and John de Hart, Richard Smith and John Cooper, Esquires. Mr.Sergeant died with the yellow fever, in Philadelphia, on the Bth of October, 1793. He left a son and two daughters by this marriage. He was the first Attorney General of Pennsyl­ vania. Instead of leaving the city during the time of the yellow fever, 1793, he remained in the city,and was a leader of those who devoted their time and money to the establishing ofhos­ pitals for the relief of the sick. No doubt many lives were saved through his action, although he became* a prey to the disease and died while engaged in the good cause.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genea-Biographical History of the Rittenhouse Family and All Its
    ' l_ IIr N l_ 11 i-± ¦ > ": IT= ? o =-— P" o ~n =**. • z O « 0 JZ ¦ : ro m Z —— ' i S 2 0 Z :• oI ' _Z j = 8 S — \ rio _z: ; - ~* ' ,I __ I : —_ \j [f Ml 111 KSEI Daniel K. Cassel. Wit §ulknU this Wiorl: FIRST, TO THE MEMORY OF OUR ANCESTORS, WHO BEQUEATHED TO US THE GLORIOUS PRIVILEGE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, AND SET US EXAMPLES OP BLAMELESS, EXEMPLARY LIVES. SECOND, TO OUR PARENTS, WHO TAUGHT US TO PRIZE THIS INHERITANCE AS A PRICELESS BOON, DIRECT FROM THE HAND OP GOD. THIRD, TO OUR CHILDREN, WHOM WE ADJURE TO CHERISH THEIR INESTIMABLE PRIVILEGES, AND KEEP UNSULLIED THE FAMILY"NAME, UNSPOTTED FROM THE WORLD. FOURTH, TO OUR POSTERITY. KAY THEY EMULATE THE WORTHY EXAMPLE OF THE "GOOD AND TRUE" WHO HAVE PRECEDED THEM, AND "HONOR GOD AND OBEY HIS COMMANDMENTS." A GENEA-BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY OF THE RITTENHOUSE FAMILY AND ALLITS BRANCHES IN AMERICA, jr" WITH SKETCHES OF THEIR DESCENDANTS, FROM THE EARLIEST AVAILABLERECORDS TO THE PRESENT TIME,INCLUDING , THE BIRTH OF WILHELM IN1644. Wiitlx portraits and other Jtlustrations. BY y/ DANIEL K. CASSEL, OF GEKMAUTOWN, PHILADELPHIA,PA. WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY ALVAH RITTENHOUSE, M.D. VOLUME I. -j-rv- Uan : PUBLISHED BY THE RITTENHOUSE MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, PHILADELPHIA,.PA. 1893. COPYRIGHT, 1893, BY THE RITTENHOUSE MEMORIALASSOCIATION. Press of Wm. f.Fell& Co., 122024 SANSOM ST., PHILADELPHIA. MOTTO. Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us That the generations to come might hnoio them, even the children which should be born; who should arise and declare them to their children.
    [Show full text]
  • D Is for Democracy: a Teacher's Guide
    D is for Democracy A Citizen’s Alphabet Guide written by Cheryl K. Grinn Portions may be reproduced for use in the classroom with this express written consent of Sleeping Bear Press. Published by Sleeping Bear Press 310 N. Main St., Suite 300 Chelsea, MI 48118 800-487-2323 www.sleepingbearpress.com The answers to this crossword can be found throughout the book D is for Democracy. Have FUN finding them!! 1 ___ ___ D ___ 2. E ___ ___ ___ ___ 3. ___ M ___ ___ ___ 4. ___ O ___ ___ ___ __ 5. ___ ___ ___ C ___ ___ ___ ___ 6. ___ ___ ___ ___ R ___ ___ ___ 7. ___ ___ ___ A ___ ___ 8. ___ ___ ___ ___ C ___ 9. ___ ___ ___ ___ Y 1. A president’s wife is called the first ___________ 2. All men are created __________ 3. To make a change or correct an error: ____________ 4. City where the famous tea party was held __________ 5. Held to choose officials: ____________ 6. Where laws are made: _____________ 7. This group in Congress has 100 members: __________ 8. Country where democracy first flourished: __________ 9. What the mint makes: ______________ The men who worked very hard to form our government are called our “Founding Fathers.” Six of these men are described in the book D is for Democracy. Match the founding father with his description 1. ____________2nd president. Helped outline the Declaration of Independence. 2. ______________ 4th president. “ Master Builder of the Constitution.” 3. ______________ 1st president.
    [Show full text]