DOCSLIB.ORG

From Gender Blind to Gender Bind: Political Strategies of the Women and Gender Constituency of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Gender Blind to Gender Bind: Political Strategies of the Women and Gender Constituency of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change From Gender Blind to Gender Bind: Political Strategies of the Women and Gender Constituency of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2020 Joanna Flavell School of Social Sciences Politics Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................2 List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................6 List of Tables..........................................................................................................................9 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................9 Declaration ...........................................................................................................................10 Copyright Statement ............................................................................................................10 Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................11 Abstract ................................................................................................................................12 Chapter 1 - Introduction .......................................................................................................13 1.1. Why ‘Gender and Climate Change’? ........................................................................18 1.1.1. Research Questions ............................................................................................22 1.2. Intersectionality as Feminist Intellectual Inquiry and Critical Praxis .......................22 1.3. The UNFCCC as a Site of Inquiry ............................................................................25 1.4. Overview of the Thesis .............................................................................................30 1.5. Original Contributions ..............................................................................................37 Chapter 2 - Enduring Debates in Feminist Climate Praxis ..................................................39 2.1. Theorising Feminist Climate Activism .....................................................................39 2.2. Enduring Debates ......................................................................................................46 2.2.1. Dilemmas of Rhetorical Strategy ...........................................................................47 2.2.2. Radical Outsiders versus Pragmatic Insiders .........................................................54 2.2.3. Questions of Power Dynamics and Hierarchies .....................................................62 2 2.2.4. The Activist - Academic Divide ............................................................................64 2.3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................67 Chapter 3 - Ecofeminist Intersectionality: Inquiry and Praxis .............................................69 3.1. Ecofeminist Intersectionality as Critical Inquiry ......................................................74 3.1.1. Social Inequality.....................................................................................................74 3.1.2. Intersecting power relations ...................................................................................76 3.1.3. Contextuality ..........................................................................................................81 3.1.4. Relationality ...........................................................................................................83 3.1.5. Complexity .............................................................................................................87 3.1.6. Social Justice ..........................................................................................................88 3.2. Transversal Politics as Ecofeminist Intersectional Praxis .........................................89 3.2.1. Solidarity Politics ...................................................................................................90 3.2.2. Epistemic Communities .........................................................................................91 3.2.3. Flexible Dialogue ...................................................................................................93 3.3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................95 Chapter 4 - Methodology .....................................................................................................96 4.1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................96 4.2. Collecting Data: Gathering Data, Conducting Interviews and Observation ...........100 4.2.1. Gathering Data .....................................................................................................100 4.2.2. Elite Interviews ....................................................................................................101 4.2.3. Direct Observation ...............................................................................................108 4.3. Interpretation and Analysis of Documents ..............................................................110 3 4.4. Internal Validity and Limitations of the Research ..................................................113 Chapter 5 - From Zero Gender to GAP: Foregrounding gender in UNFCCC history .......116 5.1. Phase 1: Zero Gender -1992 – 2007 ........................................................................117 5.1.1. Early Days: 1992 – 2002 ......................................................................................118 5.1.2. Getting Organised: 2003 – 2005 ..........................................................................121 5.1.3. Gaining Momentum: 2006 – 2007 .......................................................................126 5.2. Phase two: Mainstreaming Gender into the UNFCCC - 2007 - 2013 ....................130 5.2.1. Getting Noticed: 2007 – 2009 ..............................................................................131 5.2.2. Feminist Leadership: 2010 – 2011 .......................................................................133 5.3. Phase 3: Gender Action Plan - 2014 – 2017 ...........................................................138 5.3.1. Towards Implementation: 2014 – 2015 ...............................................................139 5.3.2. Extending the Lima Work Programme on Gender: 2016 ....................................143 5.3.3. The Gender Action Plan: 2017 .............................................................................147 5.4. Conclusion ..............................................................................................................151 Chapter 6 – Political Strategies Mobilised by the Women and Gender Constituency.......154 6.1. Rhetorical Strategies ...............................................................................................159 6.1.1. Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women ..................................................159 6.1.2. Universalising lived experience ...........................................................................164 6.1.3. Equating Gender with Women .............................................................................169 6.1.4. Intersectionality in Baby Steps ............................................................................172 6.2. Procedural Strategies ...............................................................................................175 6.2.1. Identifying entry points for gender aspects into the climate change debate ........176 4 6.2.2. Raising awareness and disseminating information ..............................................181 6.2.3. Building women’s capacity and joint strategizing ...............................................184 6.2.4. Developing a future research agenda ...................................................................189 6.3. Conclusion ..............................................................................................................192 Chapter 7 – Lessons for Ecofeminist Intersectional Praxis ...............................................195 7.1. Lessons from the WGC for Intersectional Inquiry and Praxis ................................198 7.1.1. Lesson One: There are No Easy Solutions ...........................................................198 7.1.2. Lesson Two: Prevalent domains of power have hindered intersectional praxis in the UNFCCC ..................................................................................................................199 7.1.3. Lesson Three: Intersectional inquiry and practice cannot be separated ...............207 7.2. Towards an Ecofeminist Transversal Politics .........................................................209 7.2.1. Option One: Fold and Withdraw ..........................................................................210 7.2.2. Option Two: ‘Business as Usual’ .........................................................................211 7.2.3. Option Three: Ecofeminist Transversal Politics ..................................................213
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Change Diplomacy
    Climate Change Diplomacy EU-AsiA DiAlogUE Shaping a Common Future for Europe and Asia – Sharing Policy Innovation and Best Practices in Addressing Common Challenges Climate Change Diplomacy The Way Forward for Asia and Europe © 2014 Konrad-Adenauer Stiftung and European Union All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission from the publisher. Editors: Dr. Wilhelm Hofmeister Patrick Rueppel Konrad-Adenauer Stiftung Ltd. Regional Programme Political Dialogue Asia 36 Bukit Pasoh Road Singapore 089850 Registration Number: 201228783N East Asian Institute 469A Bukit Timah Road Tower Block #06-01 Singapore 259770 European Policy Centre Résidence Palace 155 rue de la Loi B-1040 Brussels / Belgium European Union Centre in Singapore 11 Slim Barracks Rise, #06-01 Executive Centre, NTU@one-north campus Singapore 138664 Design, Layout and Typeset: Select Books Pte Ltd 65A, Jalan Tenteram #02-06, St Michael’s Industrial Estate Singapore 328958 Website: www.selectbooks.com.sg National Library Board, Singapore Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Climate change diplomacy : the way forward for Asia and Europe / editors, Dr. Wilhelm Hofmeister, Patrick Rueppel. – Singapore : Konrad Adenauer Stiftung : East Asian Institute : European Union Centre in Singapore ; Brussels, Belgium : European Policy Centre,¬ [2014] pages cm ISBN
    [Show full text]
  • The International Climate Change Regime: a Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures Farhana Yamin and Joanna Depledge Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521840899 - The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures Farhana Yamin and Joanna Depledge Frontmatter More information The International Climate Change Regime This book presents a comprehensive, authoritative and independent account of the rules, institutions and procedures governing the international climate change regime. Its detailed yet user-friendly description and analysis covers the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Kyoto Protocol, and all decisions taken by the Conference of the Parties up to 2003, including the landmark Marrakesh Accords. Mitigation commitments, adaptation, the flexibility mechanisms, reporting and review, compliance, education and public awareness, technology transfer, financial assistance and climate research are just some of the areas that are reviewed. The book also explains how the regime works, including a discussion of its political coalitions, institutional structure, negotiation process, administrative base, and linkages with other international regimes. In short, this book is the only current work that covers all areas of the climate change regime in such depth, yet in such a uniquely accessible and objective way. Farhana Yamin is a Fellow in Environment at the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex, England, specialising in global environmental issues with particular reference to climate change. Before joining IDS in 2002, she was Director of the Foundation for International Environmental Law and Development (FIELD) and led its Climate Change and Energy Programme from 1992 to 2001. She has coordinated several multi-partner research and policy collaborations for a number of governments and international organisations, including leading the team that advised the European Commission on the policy and legal framework for the European Emissions Trading Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Achieving a Domestic Consensus on Global Climate Change in the United States: Sine Qua Non to an Effective Global Response?
    Achieving a Domestic Consensus on Global Climate Change in the United States: Sine Qua Non to an Effective Global Response? A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy by Daniel Alan Reifsnyder In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2014 Dissertation Committee: Dr. William R. Moomaw, Chair Dr. Andrew C. Hess Dr. William C. Martel Daniel A. Reifsnyder 2505 Valley Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302-2800 703-519-0815 [email protected] Professional Experience DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, D.C. Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment (2006-present) (Senior Executive Service since 1994) Manage three offices (65 staff) on global climate change, environmental protection (air, ozone layer, chemicals), and conservation/water (forests, biodiversity, coral reefs) -- key achievements: Leading global efforts under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change o Chaired Ad Hoc Working Group on Long Term Cooperative Action (AWG/LCA), delivering major decision on 20 issues (adopted by 195 Parties) at Durban Conference in December 2011 o As AWG/LCA Vice Chair, helped forge historic Cancun Agreement in December 2010 o Crafted a global approach as lead U.S. technology negotiator in Copenhagen, December 2009 Protecting the stratospheric ozone layer/addressing climate change o Designed/ led U.S. effort to accelerate global phase outs of HCFCs – received EPA Ozone Award o Conceived and built a North American alliance to phase down HFCs o Developed new approaches to destroying
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Governance After the Paris Agreement
    CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AFTER THE PARIS AGREEMENT WORKSHOP REPORT * In November 2016, UCL’s Global Governance Institute (GGI) hosted over 30 leading international practitioners and scholars in the field of climate change law, governance and policy for a workshop on the Paris Agreement and its potential to drive forward effective climate governance. The event was supported by the French Embassy in London as part of its Conference-Débat series. UCL Grand Challenge and the UCL Centre for Law and Environment co-hosted the public evening panel. This report serves as a summary of the workshop’s discussions, which were held under Chatham House Rule. Following years of deadlock, the Paris Agreement adopted in December 2015 marks a dramatic breakthrough in multilateral climate negotiation. Anne-Marie Slaughter hailed it as “a model for effective global governance in the twenty-first century”.1 Indeed, the Pars Agreement embodies a new, more flexible governance approach: a hybrid of hard, soft and non-law, bottom-up and top- down mechanisms. A spirit of pragmatism – ‘don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good’ – brought negotiations in Paris to a successful conclusion. As a result, however, many of the provisions thrashed out in Paris are purposely framed in order to accelerate implementation action, leaving many questions unanswered. Considerable debate surrounds the legal, operational and normative status of provisions within the Agreement, and the potential of innovative global mechanisms, such as the global stocktake, to enable new avenues for legal and political mobilisation. Given the Agreement’s bottom-up nature it is essential that it connects with domestic governance arrangements and policy activities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of the European Union to Global Climate Change
    Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional ISSN: 0034-7329 [email protected] Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais Brasil Pavese, Carolina B.; Torney, Diarmuid The contribution of the European Union to global climate change governance: explaining the conditions for EU actorness Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 55, 2012, pp. 125-143 Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais Brasília, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=35824642008 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative ARTICLE The contribution of the European Union to global climate change governance: explaining the conditions for EU actorness A contribuição da União Europeia à governança da mudança climática global: explicando as condições para a actorness da UE CAROLINA B. PAVESE* DIARMUID TORNEY** Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 55 (special edition): 125-143 [2012] Introduction From an early stage, the European Union (EU) has played what has often been considered a leadership role in global climate governance, pushing for ambitious international commitments. Yet, as the only regional organization member of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol (KP), the EU can be considered a sui generis international climate actor. Sharing competences on climate politics with its member states, the EU’s presence in the international climate regime does not replace but rather complements that of its 27 members. As a result, the EU’s identity and role in the regime faces constraints that do not apply to any other party.
    [Show full text]
  • The São Paulo Proposal for an Agreement on Future International Climate Policy
    The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements October 2009 Discussion Paper 09-31 The São Paulo Proposal for an Agreement on Future International Climate Policy Erik Haites Margaree Consultants Canada Farhana Yamin University of Sussex United Kingdom Niklas Höhne Ecofys Germany Email: [email protected] Website: www.belfercenter.org/climate The São Paulo Proposal for an Agreement on Future International Climate Policy Erik Haites Margaree Consultants Farhana Yamin Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex Niklas Höhne Ecofys Prepared for The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements THE HARVARD PROJECT ON INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE AGREEMENTS The goal of the Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements is to help identify key design elements of a scientifically sound, economically rational, and politically pragmatic post-2012 international policy architecture for global climate change. It draws upon leading thinkers from academia, private industry, government, and non-governmental organizations from around the world to construct a small set of promising policy frameworks and then disseminate and discuss the design elements and frameworks with decision-makers. The Project is directed by Robert N. Stavins, Albert Pratt Professor of Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. For more information, see the Project’s website: http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/climate Acknowledgements Major funding for the Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements has been
    [Show full text]
  • PART 2 the Climate Policy Framework
    PART 2 The climate policy framework Examining the effectiveness and accountability of current processes GGLOBAL_CORRUPTION_CS4.indbLOBAL_CORRUPTION_CS4.indb 2233 33/15/2011/15/2011 99:42:12:42:12 AAMM 2.0 The climate policy framework Examining the effectiveness and accountability of current processes Essential climate policies are still in the making and the institutional architecture for deciding on specific policy options is vast, diverse and rapidly evolving. The contributions in this part focus on a number of key policy processes at different levels that all play a role in devising the overarching policy frameworks that will shape the global response to climate change. Process matters. The extent to which climate policy-making is organized to be transparent, accountable and inclusive determines how affected by policy capture, undue influence or corruption the eventual policies are likely to be. The analysis shows clearly that despite disproportionate attention to global climate summits, other important decisions are being taken from global to local level. This patchwork of institutions and forums for climate governance is mirrored by a proliferation of collective agreements, estimated to have surpassed 500 over the last 30 years.1 The opening contribution by Peter Newell sets the scene and traces the evolution of the most visible segment of global climate policy-making, the series of international summits that gave rise to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Kyoto Protocol and, more recently the Copenhagen Accord. Newell probes the inclusiveness of the process, the capability of different actors to engage in a meaningful way and – with a view to the events in Copenhagen – discusses the tension between inclusiveness and manageability.
    [Show full text]