11 Health Care in Prisons*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

11 Health Care in Prisons* C:/Postscript/11_HCNA3_D3.3d – 26/1/7 – 14:21 [This page: 791] 11 Health Care in Prisons* Tom Marshall, Sue Simpson and Andrew Stevens 1 Summary Introduction Providing health care for prisoners has historically been the responsibility of the prison service, not the NHS. Prison governors have been responsible for allocating resources to health care leading to considerable variation between prisons in the way in which health care services are provided. Prisons face many problems in the provision of health care, in particular relating to the need for security and inmates’ isolation from their communities. Describing the prison population The prison population has three key features: it is largely young, overwhelmingly male and has a very high turnover. About 60% of inmates are under 30 years old. Fewer than one in twenty prisoners are female. New receptions per year amount to four times the prison population. Local prisons, which receive remand prisoners directly from the courts and prisoners on short sentences, have the highest turnover. Training prisons and high security prisons, which hold prisoners on longer sentences, have a lower turnover. About one in five prisoners are on remand, that is, they are awaiting legal proceedings or sentencing. Prisoners are drawn from lower socio-economic groups and have poor levels of education. Ten per cent of the prison population is black. Prevalence and incidence of health problems The range and frequency of physical health problems experienced by prisoners appears to be similar to that of young adults in the community. However, prisoners have a very high incidence of mental health problems, in particular neurotic disorders, compared to the general population. By ICD-10 criteria, in any week, almost half of prisoners are suffering from a neurotic disorder such as anxiety or depression. One in ten prisoners has suffered from a psychotic disorder in the past year. * This chapter is an updated version of a report commissioned jointly by the Department of Health and the Directorate of Health Care of the Prison Service in England and Wales in 1998/9. C:/Postscript/11_HCNA3_D3.3d – 26/1/7 – 14:21 [This page: 792] 792 Health Care in Prisons Suicide is about eight times more common among prisoners than in an equivalent community population. Suicides most frequently occur within the first weeks and months of imprisonment. Incidents of deliberate self-harm are reported in one in sixty prisoners a year. Half of prisoners are heavy alcohol users and about one in twenty has a serious alcohol problem. About half of prisoners are dependent on drugs (principally opiates, cannabis and stimulants) and at least one quarter have injected drugs. Aminority of prisoners continue to use drugs while in prison. Services available Opportunities for informal care and self-care are very limited in prisons. Per capita expenditure on formal health care services are higher than equivalent expenditure for young adults in the NHS. Directly employed health care staff include health care officers (prison officers with some training in nursing), nursing staff (some whom may also be prison officers) and medical officers. Many prisons also contract with local general practitioners, hospital trusts, medical, dental and other specialists. In addition to access to NHS in-patient facilities, many prisons also have their own in-patient facilities. Asubstantial part of the work of Prison Health Care Services involves routine medical examination at entry and prior to release and preparing medical reports for legal reasons. Per year of imprisonment, prison inmates consult primary care doctors three times more frequently and other health care workers about 80 to 200 times more frequently than young adults in the community. Prison inmates are admitted to NHS hospitals as frequently as young adults in the community, but are also admitted to prison in-patient facilities two to sixteen times more frequently than this. Inmates are also heavy users of medical specialists and professions allied to medicine. Effectiveness of services There is little direct evidence of the effectiveness of health services in a prison setting. Relevant data are available from a range of sources of evidence-based reviews and guidelines. It is known that screening prisoners at reception fails to identify many who are mentally ill. There are effective means of managing many of the health problems of prisoners. There is a range of effective treatments for minor illnesses, some of which are available without prescription. There is a range of medications and some psychological treatments (in particular cognitive behaviour therapy) which are effective for neurotic disorders and symptoms. For a range of health problems, the work of doctors can be successfully carried out by other professionals using clinical guidelines. Recommendations Planning of health care should be based on an understanding of health care needs. Planning of health care should not be primarily driven by a concern for demand (by patients or professionals) and historical precedent. Efforts should be made to increase prisoners’ ability to self-care and to reduce their dependence on the formal health care system. The recognition and management of neurotic disorders using effective pharmacological and psychological treatments should be given a high priority in the primary health care system. To achieve this, staff will need appropriate training. The provision of prison-based in-patient C:/Postscript/11_HCNA3_D3.3d – 26/1/7 – 14:21 [This page: 793] Health Care in Prisons 793 facilities should be reviewed. The management of chronic physical and mental illnesses should follow appropriate clinical guidelines. 2 Introduction and statement of the problem Health care in prisons was for many years a matter of concern.1 Prison medicine was said to be out of date, with a very ‘medicalised’ model of care, focusing on illness not health, and with little attention to prevention, guidelines, multidisciplinary work, audit, continuing professional development, or information.2 HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, working independently of the Prison Service, reports directly to the Home Secretary on the treatment of prisoners and the conditions in which they are held. Adverse reports following inspections led to investigations into health care in prisons. In 1997 the Standing Health Advisory Committee to the Prison Service in its report The Provision of Mental Health Care in Prisons highlighted an uncoordinated approach to the delivery of mental health care.3 More recent publications addressing the main issues of concern include Patient or Prisoner?4 and the joint Prison Service and NHS Executive working group report, The Future Organisation of Prison Health Care.5 Both of these reports made recommendations for the restructuring of the Prison Health Care Service with a view to improving prison health care. Health care delivered in prisons was found rarely to be planned on the basis of need. Both reports also recommended that comprehensive health needs assessment of the prison population should be carried out. Responsibility for the health care of prisoners The health care of prisoners has until recently been funded and organised separately from the National Health Service (NHS), being the responsibility of HM Prison Service. The broad aim of the Prison Health Care Service was: to provide for prisoners, to the extent that constraints imposed by the prison environment and the facts of custody allow, a quality of care commensurate with that provided by the National Health Service for the general community, calling upon specialist services of the NHS as necessary and appropriate. Standing Order 13. Health Care. Home Office. HM Prison Service From 1992 Governors were responsible for purchasing health care for their individual prisons, with the Directorate of Health Care providing advice on strategy, policy and standards.1 This included the payment of staff; the provision of clinics for dentistry; opticians’ services; genito-urinary medicine; and pharmacy.4 The NHS was responsible for funding NHS (secondary) in-patient and outpatient care. The source of funding for NHS visiting consultants and for NHS services which reach into prisons (such as community mental health support) was less clear and varied from one prison to another. In 1996 annual health care expenditure by the prison service averaged approximately £1000 per prisoner (based on the Average Daily Population). However, this figure concealed wide variation in expenditure on health care, with some institutions spending as little as a few hundred pounds per inmate and others as much as £9000 or between 3% and 20% of their total budget on health care.5 In 1999 the establishment of a formal partnership between the Prison Service and the NHS was agreed The partnership was lead by two national joint units – a policy unit and a task force – to help support and drive the reform of prison health care from the centre. The units formally came into being on 1 April 2000. In September 2002, Ministers announced the decision to transfer the budgetary responsibility for prison C:/Postscript/11_HCNA3_D3.3d – 26/1/7 – 14:21 [This page: 794] 794 Health Care in Prisons health from the Prison Service to the Department of Health. In addition a timetable of April 2006 was agreed for full devolution of commissioning responsibility to Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). General features of the health care needs of prisoners Prisoners have general health needs similar to those found in the general population. These are often overshadowed by health care needs related to offending behaviour such as substance misuse and mental health problems. Prisoners also have health care needs which are a consequence of imprisonment. Imprisonment restricts access to family networks, informal carers and over the counter medication; the prison environment can be overcrowded and may be violent; prisoners suffer emotional deprivation and may become drug abusers or develop mental health problems whilst incarcerated. Other health care needs may be made more complicated by imprisonment such as the management of chronic diseases like diabetes or epilepsy.
Recommended publications
  • Sentencing and Immediate Custody in Wales: a Factfile
    Sentencing and Immediate Custody in Wales: A Factfile Dr Robert Jones Wales Governance Centre at Cardiff University January 2019 Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would especially like to thank Lucy Morgan for all of her help in producing this report. I would also like to thank staff working at the Ministry of Justice who have responded to the many requests for information made during the course of this research. Finally, I am extremely grateful to Alan Cogbill, Emyr Lewis, Ed Poole, Huw Pritchard and Richard Wyn Jones for their insightful comments on an earlier draft of this report. ABOUT US The Wales Governance Centre is a research centre that forms part of Cardiff University’s School of Law and Politics undertaking innovative research into all aspects of the law, politics, government and political economy of Wales, as well the wider UK and European contexts of territorial governance. A key objective of the Centre is to facilitate and encourage informed public debate of key developments in Welsh governance not only through its research, but also through events and postgraduate teaching. In July 2018, the Wales Governance Centre launched a new project into Justice and Jurisdiction in Wales. The research will be an interdisciplinary project bringing together political scientists, constitutional law experts and criminologists in order to investigate: the operation of the justice system in Wales; the relationship between non-devolved and devolved policies; and the impact of a single ‘England and Wales’ legal system. CONTACT DETAILS Wales Governance Centre at Cardiff University, 21 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3DQ. Web: http://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/wgc/ ABOUT THE AUTHOR Robert Jones is a Research Associate at the Wales Governance Centre at Cardiff University.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Provision in Wales
    House of Commons Welsh Affairs Committee Prison provision in Wales Fourth Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 30 April 2019 HC 742 Published on 17 May 2019 by authority of the House of Commons Welsh Affairs Committee The Welsh Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Office of the Secretary of State for Wales (including relations with the National Assembly for Wales). Current membership David T. C. Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) (Chair) Tonia Antoniazzi MP (Labour, Gower) Guto Bebb (Conservative, Aberconwy) Chris Davies MP (Conservative, Brecon and Radnorshire) Geraint Davies MP (Labour (Co-op), Swansea West) Jonathan Edwards MP (Plaid Cymru, Carmarthen East and Dinefwr) Susan Elan Jones MP (Labour, Clwyd South) Ben Lake MP (Plaid Cymru, Ceredigion) Jack Lopresti (Conservative, Filton and Bradley Stoke) Anna McMorrin MP (Labour, Cardiff North) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/copyright Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/welshcom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for England and Wales Annual Report 2014–15 HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for England and Wales Annual Report 2014–15
    HM Chief Annual Report Inspector of Prisons for England and Wales HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for England and Wales Annual Report 2014–15 2014 – 15 HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for England and Wales Annual Report 2014–15 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 5A of the Prison Act 1952 as amended by Section 57 of the Criminal Justice Act 1982. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 14 July 2015. HC 242 © Crown Copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications and www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474122917 Web ISBN 9781474122924 ID 30061511 07/15 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. CONTENTS Who we are and what we do 4 1 Introduction By the Chief Inspector of Prisons 6 2 The year in brief 24 3 Men in prison 28 Safety needs to improve 32 Respect outcomes under pressure
    [Show full text]
  • Roles and Identities of the Anglican Chaplain: a Prison Ethnography
    Peter Phillips Roles and identities of the Anglican chaplain: a prison ethnography A thesis submitted in accordance with the regulations for the award of the degree of PhD at Cardiff University November 2013 i DECLARATIONS This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of …………………………(insert MCh, MD, MPhil, PhD etc, as appropriate) Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 4: PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BAR ON ACCESS I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loans after expiry of a bar on access previously approved by the Academic Standards & Quality Committee. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… ii SUMMARY In this ethnography, writing as both practitioner and researcher, I represent and analyse the opinions and reflections of Anglican chaplains in English and Welsh prisons in order to locate their self-perception of role and identity. The Anglican chaplain has been a statutory appointment in every prison since 1779 and was a central figure in penal practice throughout the first half of the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Horizons Across 50 Years Edited by John Osmond and Peter Finch Photography: John Briggs
    25 25 Vision Welsh horizons across 50 years Edited by John Osmond and Peter Finch Photography: John Briggs 25 25 Vision Welsh horizons across 50 years Edited by John Osmond and Peter Finch Photography: John Briggs The Institute of Welsh Affairs exists to promote quality research and informed debate affecting the cultural, social, political and economic well being of Wales. The IWA is an independent organisation owing no allegiance to any political or economic interest group. Our only interest is in seeing Wales flourish as a country in which to work and live. We are funded by a range of organisations and individuals, including the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, and the Waterloo Foundation. For more information about the Institute, its publications, and how to join, either as an individual or corporate supporter, contact: IWA - Institute of Welsh Affairs, 4 Cathedral Road, Cardiff CF11 9LJ T: 029 2066 0820 F: 029 2023 3741 E: [email protected] www.iwa.org.uk www.clickonwales.org Inspired by the bardd teulu (household poet) tradition of medieval and Renaissance Wales, the H’mm Foundation is seeking to bridge the gap between poets and people by bringing modern poetry more into the public domain and particularly to the workplace. The H’mm Foundation is named after H’m, a volume of poetry by R.S. Thomas, and because the musing sound ‘H’mm’ is an internationally familiar ‘expression’, crossing all linguistic frontiers. This literary venture has already secured the support of well-known poets and writers, including Gillian Clarke, National Poet for Wales, Jon Gower, Menna Elfyn, Nigel Jenkins, Peter Finch and Gwyneth Lewis.
    [Show full text]
  • MJW 10 Welsh Language Commissioner
    Y Pwyllgor Deddfwriaeth, Cyfiawnder a’r Cyfansoddiad / Legislation, Justice and Constitution Committee Gwneud i Gyfiawnder weithio yng Nghymru / Making Justice work in Wales MJW 10 Ymateb gan: Comisiynydd y Gymraeg Response from: Welsh Language Commissioner Aled Roberts Comisiynydd y Gymraeg Welsh Language Commissioner Legislation, Justice and Constitution Committee Senedd Cymru Cardiff Bay Cardiff CF99 1SN [email protected] 10/06/2020 Dear Chair Consultation on making justice work in Wales Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this consultation. Language has a key role to play in ensuring the fair and effective administration of justice; and the evidence below focuses specifically on the need for the justice system and the law to operate in Welsh as well as English in order to protect the rights of citizens. In part one, in accordance with the consultation’s terms of reference, I note the facts regarding the current situation and draw specific attention to some strengths or weaknesses that have come to light. In the second part, I identify which changes I believe need to be introduced to improve how the justice system works, for the benefit of the Welsh language and its speakers. Part 1: Establishing the facts and looking to the future Legislative background 02/12 Individuals’ rights to use the Welsh language in the field of justice has evolved over time, and now Welsh is one of the two languages of law and the administration of justice in Wales. The Welsh Courts Act 1942 1 and the Welsh Language Act 1967 2 gave individuals the right to speak Welsh in court proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • ORGANIZATIONAL MODELS of PRISON HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS for BETTER GOVERNANCE Abstract
    ORGANIZATIONAL MODELS OF PRISON HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS FOR BETTER GOVERNANCE Abstract There is currently a variety of models of prison health accountability across the WHO European Region. The WHO Regional Office for Europe recommends that leadership should come from health ministries if health equity between prisons and the outside community is to be achieved. Most importantly, a whole- of-government approach is required to improve the quality of health services in prisons. This policy brief describes the governance and organizational models for prison health adopted by three European countries – Finland, Portugal and England. Each of these has a different arrangement in place, either under the Ministry of Health or under the Ministry of Justice working in partnership with the Ministry of Health. Those that have undergone a change in governance model have done so at different moments and adopted a different approach to implementing the change. Each of the three countries is considered separately, then similarities and differences between them are highlighted. Finally, recommendations are given for countries considering making a transition in the governance model that will improve the health services provided and the health status of people in prison. Keywords PRISONS PRISONERS GLOBAL HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH POLICY HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY RIGHT TO HEALTH HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION CLINICAL GOVERNANCE MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL Document number: WHO/EURO:2020-1268-41018-55685 © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).
    [Show full text]
  • Social Research
    International Review of Custodial Models for Women: Key Messages for Scotland CRIME AND JUSTICE social research International Review of Custodial Models for Women: Key Messages for Scotland Tamsyn L. Wilson Justice Analytical Services Scottish Government Scottish Government Social Research 2015 1 Contents 1. Main Messages ................................................................................................ 4 2. Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 5 3. Purpose and Scope ......................................................................................... 9 Contents of this report ......................................................................................... 10 4. Background and Context .............................................................................. 11 An international perspective ................................................................................ 11 The female prison population in Scotland ........................................................... 12 Crime type ........................................................................................................... 12 Sentence length ................................................................................................... 13 Growth in female prison population ..................................................................... 14 Reoffending rates ................................................................................................ 15 The
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Prisoners in the Prison Estate: Follow–Up Ninth Report of Session 2009–10
    House of Commons Welsh Affairs Committee Welsh prisoners in the prison estate: follow–up Ninth Report of Session 2009–10 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 23 February 2010 HC 143 Published on 3 March 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Welsh Affairs Committee The Welsh Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Office of the Secretary of State for Wales (including relations with the National Assembly for Wales). Current membership Dr Hywel Francis MP (Labour, Aberavon) (Chairman) Mr David T.C. Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Ms Nia Griffith MP (Labour, Llanelli) Mrs Siân C. James MP (Labour, Swansea East) Mr David Jones MP (Conservative, Clwyd West) Mr Martyn Jones MP (Labour, Clwyd South) Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour and Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Mr Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Mr Mark Pritchard MP (Conservative, The Wrekin) Mr Mark Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Ceredigion) Mr Hywel Williams MP (Plaid Cymru, Caernarfon) Powers The committee is one of the Departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/welsh_affairs_committee.cfm.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submission to the Commission on Justice in Wales
    WRITTEN EVIDENCE SUBMISSION TO THE COMMISSION ON JUSTICE IN WALES DR ROBERT JONES WALES GOVERNANCE CENTRE AT CARDIFF UNIVERSITY & UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH WALES JUNE 2018 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. PRISONS IN WALES 6 3. PRISON SAFETY IN WALES 8 4. MALE PRISONERS 16 5. FEMALE PRISONERS 26 6. CHILDREN IN PRISON 37 7. THE WELSH LANGUAGE 45 8. CONCLUSION 48 REFERENCES 49 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There are five male prisons in Wales that each hold a mixture of convicted, unconvicted, sentenced and unsentenced prisoners. Prison capacity in Wales has steadily increased since 2010; the prison population in Wales was 4,291 at the end of April 2018. (Chapter 2) Prisons in Wales are performing less well than prisons in England on a range of prison safety measures. The number of recorded self-harm incidents and prison assaults in Wales has increased at a higher rate than prisons in England since 2010. There were more prison disturbances at HMP Parc in 2016 and 2017 than at any other prison in England and Wales. (Chapter 3) Despite an increase in prison capacity in Wales, 39% of all Welsh prisoners were being held in English prisons in 2017. In a large number of cases, Welsh prisoners are placed in establishments far away from home; Welsh prisoners were held in 108 different prisons in 2017. (Chapter 4) The recent opening of HMP Berwyn has resulted in a significant rise in the number of English prisoners held in Wales. The English prison population in Wales more than doubled in 2017. More than a quarter of all prisoners held in Wales were from England at the end of March 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • HIV and Infectious Diseases 15
    Review of rural and urban factors affecting the costs of services and other implementation issues David Gordon* Adrian Kay* Michelle Kelly* Shailen Nandy* Martyn Senior# Mary Shaw* * University of Bristol # University of Cardiff May 2003 Final Report of the Research Team Contents Acknowledgements i Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Resource Allocation for Rural Areas 3 Chapter 2: HIV and Infectious Diseases 15 Chapter 3: Ethnicity and Health Resource Allocation in Wales 23 Chapter 4: Other Potential Urban Issues 29 Chapter 5: The Optimal Rate of Updating the NHS Wales Resource Allocation Formula 45 Chapter 6: Conclusions and Recommendations 49 Bibliography 52 Appendix I: Ethnicity and Health 58 Appendix II: The History and Genetics of Ethnic Groups in Wales 66 Acknowledgements The Research Team would like to thank Robin Jones for his help, advice and support. We would like to thank Professor Peter Townsend and the members of the project group (Trevor Neatherway, John Sweeney, Julian Haines, Dave Thomas and Claire Jones) for their assistance. We would like to thank PHLS Wales for providing data on Notifiable Diseases and HIV/AIDS. The survey of Big Issue vendors in Wales was commissioned by the Big Issue Cymru. Finally, we would like to thank Helen Anderson for her help with the editing of this report. i Introduction The purpose of this report is to provide scientific advice on implementation issues arising out of the Townsend Review for allocating NHS resources to Local Health Board areas. In particular, this report examines whether specific urban and rural factors result in unavoidable additional costs when providing health services in such areas and whether the NHS Resource Allocation Review formula for calculating allocations should be adjusted accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Secure Estate
    9 Secure estate Contents 9 Secure estate ........................................................................................................ 1 9.1 About this chapter ....................................................................................... 3 Definition of the secure estate: ................................................................... 3 Policy and legislation .................................................................................. 3 Children ...................................................................................................... 4 Transition to adulthood while in the secure estate: ..................................... 5 Portability .................................................................................................... 5 Safeguarding .............................................................................................. 6 9.2 Secure estate provision .............................................................................. 7 Current provision ........................................................................................ 7 Youth Detention Accommodation (YDA): .................................................. 10 February 2017 Onwards – Prisons ........................................................... 11 9.3 What we know about the population: key facts ......................................... 14 Numbers ................................................................................................... 14 Headline statistics ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]