DOCSLIB.ORG

Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Report 2017 ARIZONA STATE PARKS: OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE RECREATION REPORT Economic Impact of Off-Highway Recreation in the State of Arizona Project Director: Deepak Chhabra, Ph.D. Project Contributors: Eunhye Grace Kim, Ph.D. Candidate Carlton Yoshioka, Ph.D. Nicholas Stevenson, MS Student School of Community Resources and Development College of Public Service and Community Solutions 411 North Central Avenue Suite 550 Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA 602-496-0172 [email protected] 1 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................................................ 9 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 10 DATA SOURCES AND METHODS........................................................................................................... 13 STUDY LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 15 FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 Section 1: Economic Impact and Direct Expenditures by OHV Visitors based on the Online Survey ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 Out-of-State OHV Visitors ........................................................................................................ 22 OHV Operating Expenses ......................................................................................................... 26 OHV Vehicle Spending by Retained Visitors ............................................................................ 26 OHV Operating Expenses by Out-of-State Visitors .................................................................. 30 Section 2: Direct Spending of OHV Visitors at three most popular trails ..................................... 32 Out of State ............................................................................................................................... 39 Section 3: Direct Expenditures by Onsite Respondents ................................................................ 44 Retained OHV Visitors ............................................................................................................. 45 Out of State OHV Visitors ........................................................................................................ 46 2 Section 4: Marketing Profile & Travel Behavior of Online Respondents……………………………………….51 Marketing Profile ..................................................................................................................... 51 Travel Behavior ........................................................................................................................ 52 Visitor Profile ........................................................................................................................... 55 Out-of-State……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………57 Marketing Profile ................................................................................................................. 57 Travel Behavior .................................................................................................................... 58 Visitor Profile ....................................................................................................................... 60 Retained…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………62 Marketing Profile ................................................................................................................. 62 Travel Behavior .................................................................................................................... 63 Visitor Profile ....................................................................................................................... 65 Section 5: Marketing Profile & Travel Behavior of OHV Visitors at Trail Site…………………………….67 Marketing Profile ..................................................................................................................... 67 Travel Behavior ........................................................................................................................ 67 Visitor Profile ........................................................................................................................... 71 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….73 APPENDIX………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..75 Appendix A ............................................................................................................................... 76 Appendix B – OHV Operating Expense Distribution ................................................................ 78 Appendix C - Marketing Profile & Travel Behavior ................................................................. 82 Appendix D (Survey Sample) – Economic Impact of OHV Recreation in Arizona .................. 122 3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Total economic impact of OHV recreation ($)...……………………………………………… .16 Table 2: Aggregate Annual Expenditures for all OHV Users ($)...…………………………………….. 17 Table 3 Economic Impact Breakdown ($)…..………………………………………………………….... 17 Table 4 State/Local and Federal Taxes 2017 ($)……..…………………………………………………. .17 Table 5 Economic Impact Contributions of Top Ten Industries ($)……..……………………………. 18 Table 6: Total Direct Annual Spending reported on Ancillary Items ($)…...…………………………. 19 Table 7: Annual Total Spending of Retained Local OHV Visitors on Ancillary Items…..………….. 20 Table 8: Average Annual Spending of Retained OHV Visitors ($)…………..………………………… 21 Table 9: Total Spending on Ancillary Items at the Recent Trail ($)………..…………………………...21 Table 10: Average Spending of Retained Local OHV Visitors at the Recent Trail ($)……..………….22 Table 11: Total Annual Spending by Out-of-State Visitors on Ancillary Sectors ($)……..……………23 Table 12: Average Annual Spending of Out-of-State OHV Visitors ($)….….………………………….23 Table 13: Total Spending of Out-of-State OHV Visitors at a Recent Trail ($)……..…………………..24 Table 14: Average Annual Spending of Out-of-State OHV Visitors at the most recent trail ($)…..….25 Table 15: Economic Impact of OHV Expenditures ($)……………….………………………………….26 Table 16 State/Local and Federal Tax Contributions ($)……….….…………………………………….26 Table 17 Economic Impact Contributions of Top Ten Industries ($)…….……………………………..27 Table 18: Annual Total OHV Vehicle Spending by Retained AZ Users ($)…….……………………....27 Table 19: Vehicle related Expenses of Retained Local Visitors ($)……….……………………………..28 Table 20: Average Spending on OHV Vehicle Operating Expenses ($)…….…………………………..29 Table 21: Average Spending per Item across all OHV Vehicles ($)……….…………………………….29 Table 22: Average Expenditures based on Type of OHV Vehicle ($)……….…………………………..29 Table 23: Annual Vehicle-related Expenses of Out-of-State OHV Visitors ($)………………………...30 Table 24: Total operating Expenses per OHV Vehicle for Out of State Visitors ($)….………………..30 Table 25: Average Spending on OHV Vehicle Operating Expenses ($)……………………………….. 31 Table 26: Average Spending per Item across all OHV Visitors ($)……………………………………..31 Table 27: Average Expenditures based on Type of OHV Vehicle ($)………………………………….. 31 Table 28: Total Economic Impact of OHV Recreation (Ancillary Spending) ($)………………………32 Table 29 Economic Impact Breakdown in terms of Direct, Indirect and Induced Benefits ($)……….32 Table 30 State/Local and Federal Taxes Contributions ($)……………………………………………...33 Table 31: Aggregate Ancillary Expenditures for Top Three Trails ($)…………………………………33 Table 32: Economic Impact of Ancillary Spending at Boulders ($)……………………………………..33 Table 33 State/Local and Federal Tax Contributions ($)……………………………………………… .34 Table 34 Economic Impact Contributions of Top Ten Industries ($)…………………………………...34 Table 35: Total Direct Spending by Retained OHV Users on Ancillary Items ($) …………………….35 Table 36: Average Spending by Retained OHV AZ Users, at Boulders, on Ancillary Items ($)……..35 Table 37: Economic Impact of Ancillary Spending at Boulders ($)……….…………………………….36 Table 38: State/Local and Federal Tax Contributions ($)………………………………………………36 Table 39: Economic Impact Contributions of Top Ten Industries ($)…………………………………..37 Table 40: Total Spending by Retained OHV AZ Users, at Lake Havasu, on Ancillary Items………...37 Table 41: Average Spending by Retained OHV Visitors on Ancillary Items ($)……………………….38 Table 42: Total Annual Spending by Out of State OHV Visitors on Ancillary Sectors ($)……………39 Table 43: Average Spending by Out of State Spending on Ancillary Items ($)……………………….. 40 Table 44: Economic Impact of Ancillary Spending at Table Mesa ($)………………………………….41 4 Table 45: State/Local and Federal Tax Contributions ($)………………………………………………41 Table 46: Economic Impact Contributions of Top Ten Industries ($)…………………………………..42 Table 47: Total
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT on the PHOENIX
    CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT ON THE PHOENIX AMA Prepared for: United States Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Prepared by: Brown and Caldwell 201 East Washington Street, Suite 500 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Brown and Caldwell Project No. 23481.001 C-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ....................................................................................................... 5 3.0 GENERALIZED GEOLOGY ............................................................................................ 6 3.1 BEDROCK GEOLOGY ......................................................................................... 6 3.2 BASIN GEOLOGY ................................................................................................ 6 4.0 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 9 4.1 GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona
    2.SOB nH in ntoiOGIGM. JAN 3 1 1989 Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701-C Chapter C Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona By ED DE WITT, S.M. RICHARD, J.R. HASSEMER, and W.F. HANNA U.S. Geological Survey J.R. THOMPSON U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS- WEST-CENTRAL ARIZONA AND PART OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publlcatlon Data Mineral resources of the Harquahala Mountains wilderness study area, La Paz and Maricopa counties, Arizona. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas west-central Arizona and part of San Bernardino County, California ; ch. C) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701-C) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1701-C 1. Mines and mineral resources Arizona Harquahala Mountains Wilderness. 2. Harquahala Mountains (Ariz.) I. DeWitt, Ed. II. Series. III. Series: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701. QE75.B9 no. 1701-C 557.3 s [553'.09791'72] 88-600012 [TN24.A6] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UCRC Annual Report for Water Year 2019
    SEVENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT OF THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 2 UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION 355 South 400 East • Salt Lake City, UT 84111 • 801-531-1150 • www.ucrcommission.com June 1, 2021 President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear President Biden: The Seventy-Second Annual Report of the Upper Colorado River Commission, as required by Article VIII(d)(13) of the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact of 1948 (“Compact”), is enclosed. The report also has been transmitted to the Governors of each state signatory to the Compact, which include Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming and Arizona. The budget of the Commission for Fiscal Year 2021 (July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021) is included in this report as Appendix B. Respectfully yours, Amy I. Haas Executive Director and Secretary Enclosure 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................. 8 COMMISSIONERS .................................................................................... 9 ALTERNATE COMMISSIONERS ........................................................... 10 OFFICERS OF THE COMMISSION ....................................................... 10 COMMISSION STAFF ............................................................................. 10 COMMITTEES ......................................................................................... 11 LEGAL COMMITTEE ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cogjm Usdi New Rel 1969-06-11.Pdf (170.1Kb)
    UNITED STArrES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR * * * * * * * * * * * * * ********news release BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Region 4, Solt Lake City, Utah Telephone: 524-5403 For release: Wednesday, June 11, 1969 BELOW NORMAL APRIL-JULY COLORADO RIVER RUNOFF OF 7.4 Ml LU ON ACRE-FEET FORECAST Moy hos been the third consecutive month of subnormal precipitation in the Colorado River Basin above Lees Ferry, causing the April-July runoff forecast to foll to 7.4 million acre-feet or 87 percent of normal, the Bureau of Reclamation announced today. An even lower runoff forecast is avoided only by the presence of above normal snow accumulations in the high mountains. Another milestone was reached lost month in the uti lization of water of the Colorado River in the Upper Basin . On Thursday night, Moy 29, 1969, water stored in Lake Powell reached elevation 3570 feet, which is "roted head" for the powerplont located at the toe of Glen Canyon Dom . "Roted head" is the lowest level at which water flowing through the turbines con drive the generators at their nameplate capacity. With normal rai nfall, it is expected that Lake Powell 's water surface should reach on all-time high in July at about elevation 3580 feet with a live storage of about 10,290,000 acre-feet. Planned releases from Lake Powell for water year 1969 ore about 8 . 8 million ocre­ feet. For the next 3 years thereafter annual releases should be near this amount in order to deliver Colorado River Compact requirements to the Lower Basin. The entire release wi 11 be used to generate power for power customers in both the Upper and Lower Bosi ns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012
    The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012 (Photographs: Arizona Game and Fish Department) Arizona Game and Fish Department In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDED CITATION ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ iii DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ iv BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 THE MARICOPA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................... 8 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ................................................... 10 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MASTER LIST OF WILDLIFE LINKAGES AND HABITAT BLOCKSAND BARRIERS ................ 16 REFERENCE MAPS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology, Geology, and Listric Normal Faulting of the Vulture Mountains, Maricopa County, Arizona
    Arizona Geological Society Digest, Volume XII, 1980 89 Geochronology, Geology, and Listric Normal Faulting of the Vulture Mountains, Maricopa County, Arizona by WA. Rehrigi, M. Shafiqullah2, and P.E. Damon2 Abstract Geologic mapping and geochronologic studies in the Vulture Mountains near Wickenburg, Arizona, have led to the recognition of a large, northeast-trending batholith of 68.4-m.y. age that intrudes complex gneissic and granitic rocks of probably Precambrian age. Over- lying the denuded crystalline terrane is a sequence of late Oligocene to Miocene ( .'26 to 16 m.y.) volcanic rocks (vitrophyres, ash-flow tuffs, welded tuffs, breccias, agglomerates, and lava flows) that vary locally. Nearby source areas are suggested. A swarm of north- to north-northwest-trending porphyritic dikes intrudes the volcanics and crystalline basement. Overlying this volcanic sequence in angular unconformity is a thin section of basal conglom- erate and basalt lava flows dated at 13.5 m.y. B.P. The older, tuffaceous sequence is generally calc-alkalic but with a high proportion of rhyolites that are exceptionally rich in potassium and silica. These silicic units are peral- kaline or nearly so, and those with K20/Na2O >3 are ultrapotassic. Initial strontium ratios average 0.7081, whereas an initial ratio for the younger basalt sequence is significantly lower at 0.7054. The silicic volcanics have been severely tilted on multiple, low-angle listric normal faults. The youngest basalt flows are relatively flat lying and postdate this deformation. By geo- logic and radiometric criteria, the transition from tilted silicic volcanics to untilted basalts occurred between about 16 and 14 m.y.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Geologic Map and Cross Sections of the Big Horn And
    GEOLOGIC MAP AND CROSS SECTIONS OF THE BIG HORN AND BELMONT MOUNTAINS, WEST-CENTRAL ARIZONA James A. Stin1ac, Stephen M. Richard, Stephen J. Reynolds, Richard C. Capps, Curtis P. Kortel11eier, Michael J. Grubensky, George B. Allen, Floyd Gray, and Robert J. Miller Open-File Report 94-15 ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TUCSON, ARIZONA NOVEIVIBER, 1994 This report is preliminary and lias not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standards INTRODUCTION The principal geologic feature of the Big Hom and Belmont Mountains is a complexly faulted and tilted series of mostly Miocene volcanic rock that record a period of Middle Tertiary magmatism and extension. These volcanic rocks vary widely in composition, but basaltic and rhyolitic rocks are most abundant (Figure 1). Intrusive equivalents of these volcanics exposed in the Belmont Mountains are dominantly granitic. Despite the large volume of rhyolite erupted, small, coalescing flow and dome complexes were formed in preference to large- MIocene and Oligocene sandstone and conglomerate Hot Rock basalt Burnt Mountain volcanics Big Horn volcanics Intrusive rocks pre-Tertiary rocks I~ ,:- ; ~ _I Big Horn granodiorite (Cretaceous) ~ Igneous and metamorpchic rocks ~ (Proterozoic through Mesozoic) Figure 1. Generalized lithologic map of the Big Hom and Belmont Mountains volume ash-flow tuffs, and no collapse calderas were formed. These rocks lie in the upper plate ofthe regional Whipple-Buckskin-Bullard detachment fault [Rehrig and Reynolds, 1980], at its southeastern tip [Richard et aI, 1990a]. A regional boundary between major tilts domains in Tertiary strata follows an irregular course from northwest to southeast through the range [Rehrig et aI., 1980].
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Ecosystems and Their Management: Reconciling
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Xeroriparian Systems Used by Desert Mule Deer in Texas And Arizona1 Paul R. Krausman2 , Kurt R. Rautenstrauch3 and Bruce D. Leopold4 Abstract.--We examined desert mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus crooki) occurrance in xeroriparian systems in Arizona and Texas. Most deer in Arizona were located in washes. Most deer in Texas were located between washes. Xeroriparian areas are important habitat components for desert mule deer when they provide forage, thermal cover and travel lanes. INTRODUCTION STUDY AREAS Desert mule deer inhabit the Sonoran and Desert mule deer use of xeroriparian systems Chihuahuan Deserts of North America. Their range was evaluated on the northeastern edge of their extends from southwest Texas to western Arizona range in Big Bend National Park (BBNP), southwest and south into central Mexico (Wallmo 1981). Texas; in the westcentral part of their range in the Belmont Mountains, central Arizona; and on the Desert mule deer are a popular and important northwestern edge of their range in King Valley, game animal, but have received limited attention southwest Arizona. by the scientific community. Clark (1953) examined desert mule deer behavior and movement BBNP, Brewster Co., is representative of the patterns, Truett (1972) studied their general rugged Chihuahuan Desert and is included in the ecology, Krausman (1978) and Leopold (1984) Chisos biotic district (Dice 1943). Elevations evaluated their forage preferences, and Krausman extend from 573 m along the Rio Grande to 2384 m (1984) and Rautenstrauch and Krausman (unpublished at Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin River Rim Trail Access from I-15 Take Exit 59 for UT-56/200 North
    Getting There From Cedar City to Te-ah: Approximately 32 miles The Virgin River Rim Trail Access From I-15 take Exit 59 for UT-56/200 North. Proceed east The Virgin River Rim Trail winds through 32 miles of some on 200 North for 1 mile to the intersection with Main of the most spectacular scenery southern Utah has to Virgin River The Virgin River Rim Trail can be accessed from several Street. Turn right onto Main Street and head south for 0.2 offer. From stunning pink cliffs, to verdant high altitude points depending on how far, and which direction you wish miles to the intersection with Center Street/University forests, the trail offers a little something for everyone. to travel. Blvd/UT-14. Turn left onto Center Street/UT-14 and Rim Trail continue southeast on UT-14 for 25.3 miles to the junction The trail is long and can be quite rigorous at points so From Strawberry Point N 37° 26.177’ W 112° 42.684’ with Navajo Lake Road/Forest Road #053. Turn right onto most people choose to only enjoy a portion at a time. The From Cascade Falls N 37° 29.837’ W 112° 45.096’ Navajo Lake Road and continue 5.7 miles. After you pass following suggestions are provided to help you find the From Te-ah (Navajo Lake) N 37° 32.020’ W 112° 49.300’ Te-Ah campground but before you take the sweeping left adventure you are looking for during your visit to the Dixie Cedar City From Woods Ranch N 37° 35.643’ W 112° 54.980’ turn to the south you will see a pull out and a trailhead National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Corners Regional
    «¬96 ¤£191 ¤£40 «¬46 287 «¬79 UTAH ¬131 «¬9 ¤£6 40 ¤£ COLORADO«¬36 36 ¤£89 « «¬103 ¤£ ¨¦§225 ¤£ ¬264 «¬74 «¬132 « 70 177 «¬13 §¨¦ 6 «¬5 «¬ 1 Four Corners National Monument 117 ¤£ 1 Four«¬75 Corners«¬88 National«¬470 Monument «¬ 116 2 Hovenweep National Monument «¬78 «¬ 124 139 2 Canyons of the Ancients National Monument Four«¬ Corners«¬ Regional Map 9 3 Bluff Fort «¬ 3 «¬ 121Lowry¤£85 Pueblo 4 Valley of the Gods «¬31 4 Cortez 155 ¤£285 5 Goosenecks State Park 125 «¬ 5 Canyons of the Ancients Visitor Center «¬ 105 6 Goulding's Trading Post Museum «¬29 «¬91 6 Mesa«¬ Verde National Park 28 www.aztecnm.com 1-888-543-4629 7 La Plata Canyon 83 «¬86 7 The Dinosaur Museum «¬ «¬67 «¬ ¤£6 57 ¤£6 8 Durango - Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad 8 Edge of the Cedars State Park «¬ 330 ¤£50 «¬ 9 Chimney Rock National Monument 9 Natural Bridges National Monument ¤£50 )"15 «¬82 9 ¬64 «¬ 10 Pagosa Springs 10 Newspaper Rock State Park « ¤£6 ¤£6 65 133 ¤£24 11 Silverton «¬217 11 Canyonlands National Park (East«¬100 Entrance) «¬10 «¬ «¬ )"18 «¬6 «¬141 12 Ouray 12 Canyonlands«¬257 National Park (North Entrance) 13 Telluride «¬21 13 Hole in the Rock 14 Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park 14 Arches National Park §¨¦70 15 Dinosaur Journey¤£24 (Museum of Western«¬94 Colorado) 15 Dead Horse Point State Park133 119 16«¬67 Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve «¬ «¬ «¬9 «¬21 16 Goblin Valley State Park ¤£89 «¬128 «¬135 17 Little Wild Horse Canyon «¬141 115 «¬313 «¬348 «¬ 18 John Wesley Powell River History Museum «¬72 )"14 Colorado Scenic Byways )"17)"16
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona's Wildlife Linkages Assessment
    ARIZONAARIZONA’’SS WILDLIFEWILDLIFE LINKAGESLINKAGES ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT Workgroup Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Arizona’s Wildlife Linkages Assessment Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Siobhan E. Nordhaugen, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Evelyn Erlandsen, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Habitat Branch Paul Beier, Northern Arizona University, School of Forestry Bruce D. Eilerts, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Ray Schweinsburg, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Terry Brennan, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest Ted Cordery, Bureau of Land Management Norris Dodd, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Melissa Maiefski, Arizona Department of Transportation, Environmental Planning Group Janice Przybyl, The Sky Island Alliance Steve Thomas, Federal Highway Administration Kim Vacariu, The Wildlands Project Stuart Wells, US Fish and Wildlife Service 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT First Printing Date: December, 2006 Copyright © 2006 The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written consent from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written consent of the copyright holder. Additional copies may be obtained by submitting a request to: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup E-mail: [email protected] 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Mission Statement “To identify and promote wildlife habitat connectivity using a collaborative, science based effort to provide safe passage for people and wildlife” 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Primary Contacts: Bruce D.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 2B: New Mexico Public Lands Highlights No Identified Conflicts
    Examination of New Mexico Public Lands in regards to the Wild Horse Act (NMSA 77-18-5, 2007) 109°0'0"W 108°0'0"W 107°0'0"W 106°0'0"W 105°0'0"W 104°0'0"W 103°0'0"W 37°0'0"N 37°0'0"N Sugarite Canyon State Park 87 84 Edward Sargent Wildlife Management Area ¤£ Navajo Axtell ¤£ Rio De Los Pinos Wildlife Area Punche Valley WHA Jicarilla Raton Unknown State Land (OID 1119) ¤£64 Carracas Mesa WHA 5 Acres:160 ¤£84 Urraca Wildlife Management Area 64 Unknown State Land (OID 1116) William A. Humphries Wildlife Management Area ¤£ Jackson Lake Wildlife Management Area Aztec Acres: 477 64 ¤£ 5 87 Navajo Lake State Park ¤£285 ¤£ ¤£64 ¤£85 5Farmington Ancones SAN JUA Phase I (Unknown State Land; OID 1121) N R IVER £64 Tierra Amarilla ¤ 5 Acres: 2220 Heron Lake State Park Red River State Hatchery Elliott Barker Wildlife Management Area ¤£64 Clayton Lake State Park 25 Colfax §¨¦ ¤£64 El Vado Lake State Park Rio Chama Wildlife Management Area Tres Piedras WMA ¤£64 Jarita Mesa WHT Vallecitos Refuge (OID 1120) Cimarron Canyon State Park ¤£64 Acres: 132 Union Eagle Nest Lake State Park Clayton San Juan Rio Arriba Taos ¤£87 Colin Neblett Wildlife Management Area 5 ¤£64 ¤£87 Mesa de las Viegas WHT (Inactive) 85 ¤£ £56 C 5 ¤ H Taos A Mesa Montosa (Inactive) C O ¤£285 56 R 84 ¤£ I ¤£ V E R Coyote Creek State Park (OID 1081) Acres: 456 R IO C H A Charette Lake Fishing Area M A ¤£491 ¤£550 Circle A Ranch 36°0'0"N Mora Wagon Mound Wildlife Management Area Espanola 36°0'0"N Chicoma WHT (Inactive) 5 Unknown State Land (OID 1117) Mora Acres: 7306 5 ¤£85 Bluebird WMA
    [Show full text]