DOCSLIB.ORG

Challenges to the Power of Zeus in Early Greek Poetry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Challenges to the Power of Zeus in Early Greek Poetry Challenges to the Power of Zeus in Early Greek Poetry Noriko Yasumura Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University College London London University 2003 ProQuest Number: U643385 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U643385 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract Challenges to the Power of Zeus in Early Greek Poetry In the earliest extant works of Greek literature, Zeus reigns supreme in the Olympian hierarchy. However, throughout the early Greek portrayals of him, there are allusions — scattered and scanty as they may be — to threats of rebellion which challenge Zeus' supremacy. This thesis examines these passages, dravm from Homer, Hesiod and the Homeric Hymns, to offer new interpretations of these texts. While focusing on the theme of cosmic/divine strife, I also reveal hidden logic and lost legends underlying these texts: discoveries of significance to the improved understanding of early Greek poetry. Chapter one, focusing on Thetis' supplication, examines the crisis of Zeus in Iliad 1. I analyse the (mythological) theme of the son who is mightier than his father, interpreting Achilles and Peleus' relationship in terms of succession myth. Chapter two explores the Golden Chain of Hera in Iliad 15. Retracing a lost Gigantomachia epic, I view the incident from the perspective of cosmic strife, discussing Hera's rebellion and the role of Heracles in this rebellion. Drawing on the re-evaluation of the Gigantomachia, Chapter three investigates the war between the gods in the Iliad, concentrating on antagonism between Zeus and Poseidon, which reaches its end with Zeus' reordering of the universe. Chapter four reinterprets the Hesiodic account of Athena's birth, offering solutions as to how and why Zeus achieves his final conquest in the succession story. Chapter five considers the Typhon-story in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo. Examining this hymn from the broad perspective of the struggle for cosmic power, I re-integrate this story into the hymn. Chapter six focuses on the love of Aphrodite and Anchises in the Hymn to Aphrodite. I explore the dual themes of mortality and the bitter sorrow of Aphrodite - defeated by Zeus and diminished in power. Table of Contents Acknowledgements 6 Introduction 7 Chapter I The Threat of Thetis 24 1. The supplication of Thetis 25 2. Generational Strife. 35 3. Peleus and Achilles 46 Chapter II The Golden Chain of Hera 66 1. The 86crp.6s* of the gods in the Iliad . 67 2. The golden chain of Hera . 77 3. Heracles: the motive for the golden chain 85 Chapter III The Reordering of the Universe 101 1. The 'tug of war' between Zeus and Poseidon . 102 2. The wrath of Zeus and Poseidon 112 3. The Reordering of the universe 124 Chapter IV The Birth of Athena 133 1. Near Eastern succession myth and Hesiod's Theogony 133 2. The Hesiodic accounts: the route to Zeus' victory 140 3. The birth of Athena 150 Chapter V Typhon, the son of Hera 171 1. The dragon ..... 172 2. The Arrangement of the motifs of the dragon and Typhon 174 3. Typhon ..... 176 4. Hera .... 181 5. Telphousa .... 193 Chapter VI The Bitter Sorrow of Aphrodite . 198 1. Human limitation and irony .... 200 2. The sorrow of Aphrodite ..... 220 Conclusion . ...... 246 Abbreviations . ...... 250 Bibliography . ...... 252 Acknowledgements I could not have completed this thesis without generous support from a large number of people, who generously spared me their time and offered me invaluable insights and advice. I am especially grateful to Professor Richard Janko, my supervisor, who kept me on the right track. He always had time to read and comment on my work; his support and encouragement were generous and for this I will always be grateful. I am indebted beyond measure to Professor Pat Easterling. From the time I first met her in Cambridge in 1994, her exceptional intellectual guidance has been as unfailing as the spirit of her moral support. It has been my privilege to know her and enjoy all the benefits of her generous nature. I would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by Kanazawa University in Japan, which enabled me to complete this work. I also express my deep gratitude to my colleagues at Kanazawa University, who generously took on all of my duties while I was on sabbatical in 2001-2002. Special thanks are due to my many friends, in particular to Dr Natalie Tchemetska who have always sustained me on this long journey. Above all, I would like to thank Dr Victoria Jennings and Dr Andrea Katsaros, who read my manuscripts carefully, tirelessly corrected my English, and offering much valuable advice. Their patience and support were indispensable for the completion of this thesis. Finally, I would like to thank my family for their unlimited empathy, understanding and patience. Introduction In this dissertation I offer an innovative interpretation of a number of early Greek epic texts in which I have found common compositional connections through the theme of the accomplishment and maintenance of Zeus' Olympian supremacy in the face of the challenges and challengers for cosmic domination. This study examines the traces - the legacy of predecessors in the poetic tradition - contained in early Greek poetry. In the earliest extant works of Greek literature, Zeus reigns supreme in the Olympian hierarchy. By the eighth century, the concept of the Olympian 'family' had crystallised: they are the principal mythical figures in epic, and Zeus' power over them is already secure. However, there are indications that before this time, Zeus faced and overcame challenges which threatened his rule over the universe. In the Iliad, Poseidon and Hera always appear in alliance against Zeus; and his son and daughters, Apollo, Aphrodite and Athena, are also problematic figures deserving of consideration for their roles in familial internecine conflicts. There is no indication of Zeus' supremacy in the Mycenaean documents. The religious tablets from Pylos contain a great number of what appear to be the names of gods,^ among whom Poseidon is clearly the most significant. For example, in Pylos tablet ’ It is surprising that there are so many deities on the Pylos tablets who are unknown in the classical period; for example,manasa, dopota, and dirimijo (Tn 316). This seems to indicate that Mycenaean society, at least in Pylos, allowed variety in religious devotion, although Poseidon is undoubtedly the most important among the gods listed. Because of the scanty evidence, it is difficult to get much of the religious information at the Mycenaean sites other than Pylos. Chadwick (1976) 15 points out that 'the homogeneity of Mycenaean culture is so marked, that it would be strange if other parts of Greece behaved very differently. ' If this holds true, we might be able to think that it was a general phenomena that a variety of gods were worshipped in the Mycenaean cites. Tn 316,^ thirteen divine names are present, including Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, Hermes, and Potnia (the other eight names remain uncertain). A golden vessel is dedicated to each of these figures, and some of them are also offered a human dedication.^ Poseidon's prestigious position in Pylos is attested by the fact that the shrine of Poseidon is listed at the top of the tablet and offered, specifically and exceptionally, two women. He is also an important deity on the other Pylos tablets: in the Es group of tablets, he receives annual contributions of grain (with three other uncertain figures),"^ and his offerings are by far the largest; in Un 718 he is the recipient of a long list of offerings including oxen, sheep, goats, pigs, wheat, wine, honey, unguents, wool and cloth.^ From the perspective offered by these documents, Poseidon appears to be the strongest of all the gods in Pylos. This picture fits well with Odyssey 3. 43, which narrates how Telemachus and Athena (disguised as Mentor) join in celebrating the festival of Poseidon at Pylos. Compared with the importance of Poseidon, Zeus does not appear as particularly consequential in the tablet documents. Tablet Tn 316 records his ostensibly unexceptional nature: he is just an ordinary god, receiving the same quantity of offerings ^ Palmer (1963) 265-6 suggests that the operation recorded in this tablet might be human sacrifice at the New Year festival for the purpose of the removal of the previous year's guilt and defilement. Chadwick (1976) 89-90 submits that this document might have been written in the last days of the existence of the palace o f Pylos, since it is 'the most disgraceful piece of hastily compiled record of offerings.' One of the significant features of this tablet is that Zeus and Hera are mentioned together. ^ The content of tablet Tn 316 is as follows (see Ventris and Chadwick (1956) 286-9; Gallavotti ed., Inscriptiones Pyliae ad Mycenaeam Aetatem Pertinentes, 1961; Palmer (1963) 261-8): those who get one golden vessel and two women: the precinct of Poseidon; one golden vessel and a man: Zeus, Hermes; one golden vessel and a woman: potinija (Potnia), the Dove-goddess,manasa, posidaeja (the feminine form of Poseidon?),diuja (the feminine form of Zeus?), Hera; one golden vessel only:tiriseroe (Trishero?), dopota, ipemedeja (Iphimedeia, the mother of Otos and Epialtes by Poseidon in Od.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Iliad Homer
    The Iliad Homer BOOK I. How Agamemnon and Achilles fell out at the siege of Troy; and Achilles withdrew himself from battle, and won from Zeus a pledge that his wrong should be avenged on Agamemnon and the Achaians. Sing, goddess, the wrath of Achilles Peleus’ son, the ruinous wrath that brought on the Achaians woes innumerable, and hurled down into Hades many strong souls of heroes, and gave their bodies to be a prey to dogs and all winged fowls; and so the counsel of Zeus wrought out its accomplishment from the day when first strife parted Atreides king of men and noble Achilles. Who among the gods set the twain at strife and variance? Apollo, the son of Leto and of Zeus; for he in anger at the king sent a sore plague upon the host, so that the folk began to perish, because Atreides had done dishonour to Chryses the priest. For the priest had come to the Achaians’ fleet ships to win his daughter’s freedom, and brought a ransom beyond telling; and bare in his hands the fillet of Apollo the Far- darter upon a golden staff; and made his prayer unto all the Achaians, and most of all to the two sons of Atreus, orderers of the host; “Ye sons of Atreus and all ye well-greaved Achaians, now may the gods that dwell in the mansions of Olympus grant you to lay waste the city of Priam, and to fare happily homeward; only set ye my dear child free, and accept the ransom in reverence to the son of Zeus, far-darting Apollo.” The Iliad Homer Then all the other Achaians cried assent, to reverence the priest and accept his goodly ransom; yet the thing pleased not the heart of Agamemnon son of Atreus, but he roughly sent him away, and laid stern charge upon him, saying: “Let me not find thee, old man, amid the hollow ships, whether tarrying now or returning again hereafter, lest the staff and fillet of the god avail thee naught.
    [Show full text]
  • 1186 B.C.E. the Trojan War Greece
    1186 B.C.E. The Trojan War Greece The events in the myth of The Judgement of Paris started a period of war called the Trojan War, in which the city of Troy and its allies fought the city­state of Sparta and its allies. Most of what we know of the Trojan War comes from epics such as Homer’s I​liad a​nd O​ dyssey,​ but there is evidence that the Trojan War was a real event; the problem is that we don’t know exactly how much of what is described in the I​liad ​is true. For example, the I​liad f​eatures Gods and Goddesses not present in modern society or belief, as well as people that may have been idealized as war heroes. The following is what we know about the events of the Trojan War from the I​liad.​ Menelaus, the king of Sparta, was so angry that Paris had taken his wife that he set out to wage war with Paris and the city of Troy. To do so, he sent out for certain people to help, such as Odysseus, the hero of the Odyssey,​ and Achilles, who a seer said the war would not be won without. The Greeks first attacked nearby kingdoms that were supplying Troy, destroying the Trojan economy, killing Trojan hero Hector and looting spoils of war. However, the Greeks couldn’t break down the wall that surrounded Troy, so Odysseus devised a plan now known as the Trojan Horse. The Greeks hid inside a giant wooden horse that they tricked the Trojans to let inside their walls.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpt from Euripides' Herakles
    Excerpt from Euripides’ Herakles (lines 1189-1426) The action up until now: The goddess Hera has sent Madness upon Herakles. Madness has driven Herakles to kill his wife and his children. He mistook them for his enemies, being under the influence of Madness. Herakles is just coming out of the frenzied state he was in, and beginning to realise what he has done. He is contemplating suicide. Suddenly, Theseus of Athens appears on the scene. After a discussion with Herakles’ father Amphitryon, Theseus learns what has happened. At this moment, Herakles is lying in among his dead family members, ashamed of his actions, not wanting Theseus to see his face. I have included some lines here of the discussion between Theseus and Amphitryon, that will lead into the essential discussion between Herakles and Theseus. Theseus What do you mean? What has he done? Amphitryon Slain them in a wild fit of frenzy with arrows dipped in the venom of the hundred-headed hydra. Theseus This is Hera's work; but who lies there among the dead, old man? Amphitryon My son, my own enduring son, that marched with gods to Phlegra's plain, there to battle with giants and slay them, warrior that he was. Theseus Ah, ah! whose fortune was ever so cursed as his? Amphitryon Never will you find another mortal that has suffered more or been driven harder. Theseus Why does he veil his head, poor wretch, in his robe? Amphitryon He is ashamed to meet your eye; his kinsman's kind intent and his children's blood make him abashed.
    [Show full text]
  • Dan Beachy-Quick Anaximander of Miletus, Son of Prixiades…
    In the deserts of the heart Let the healing fountain start, In the prison of his days Teach the free man how to praise FREE W.H. Auden POETRY Dan Beachy-Quick Anaximander Free Poetry publishes essays and poetry by today’s leading poets. These chapbooks are available free of Vol. 15 No. 5 April 2020 charge and without copyright. The editor encourages the reproduction of this chapbook and its free distribution, ad infinitum. For further information please contact the editor at: [email protected] Anaximander (trans. by) Dan Beachy-Quick Anaximander of Miletus, son of Prixiades… Anaximander, friend of Thales, and fellow citizen… Anaximander of Miletus, son of Priaxides, whose mind Thales birthed, his student and his successor… Diodorus of Ephesus, writing about Anaximander, says that he affected a tragic pomp (like a goat-skin swollen with wine) and donned clothes to look like holy man. 1 Eratosthenes says, and Hecataeus of Miletus agrees, that Homer and Anaximander were the first two to publish books on Geography. …among the Greeks of whom we know, he was the first to bring forth, from hard toil, a book on the nature of Nature. Like a child left waiting in a field, he wrote down a summary of his principle thoughts, which somehow Apollodorus of Athens happened to find. 2 He wrote , , ​On Nature​ ​The Wandering Earth​ ​Of​ ​the Constant Sources (in sequential order) , and one other book. ​ ​ Stars, Spheres​ 1. Diogenes Laertius 26. Aëtius 2. Strabo 27. Aëtius 3. Theophrastus 28. Aëtius 4. Diogenes Laertius 29. Aëtius 5. Strabo 30. Eudemus 6.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EPONYMOUS OFFICIALS of GREEK CITIES: I Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 83 (1990) 249–288
    ROBERT K. SHERK THE EPONYMOUS OFFICIALS OF GREEK CITIES: I aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 83 (1990) 249–288 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 249 The Eponymous Officials of Greek Cities: I (A) Introduction The eponymous official or magistrate after whom the year was named in Greek cities or as- sociations is well known to all epigraphists under various titles: archon, prytanis, stephanepho- ros, priest, etc. Some details about them have appeared in many articles and in scattered pas- sages of scholarly books. However, not since the publication of Clemens Gnaedinger, De Graecorum magistratibus eponymis quaestiones epigraphicae selectae (Diss. Strassburg 1892) has there been a treatment of the subject as a whole, although the growth of the material in this regard has been enormous.1 What is missing, however, is an attempt to bring the material up to date in a comprehensive survey covering the whole Greek world, at least as far as possible. The present article, of which this is only the first part, will present that material in a geographically organized manner: mainland Greece and the adjacent islands, then the Aegean islands, Asia Minor and Thrace, Syria, Egypt, Cyrene, Sicily, and southern Italy. All the epi- graphic remains of that area have been examined and catalogued. General observations and conclusions will be presented after the evidence as a whole has been given. I. Earliest Examples of Eponymity The earliest form of writing appeared in Sumer and Assyria sometime within the last half of the fourth millennium BC, and from there it spread westward. Thus, it is not at all surpris- ing that the Mesopotamian civilizations also made the earliest use of assigning names or events to years in dating historical records.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judgment of Paris, [In:] I
    s T u di e s in anci e nt art and ci v ili z ation 1 0 Kraków 2007 Grzegorz Łaczek Cracow THE JUDGEMENT OF PARIS Cylyndric vessels - pyxides made of ivory are an important group among the products of antic craftsmanship. The vessels of that type were created using the natural properties of this specyfic material. Boxes or other vessels of that type were later used as jewellery or cosmetics containers for women. The outher surface of pyxides was decorated with relief (often figurative), what further increased their esthetic value. The form of such a cylyndric vessel made from this particular section of an elephant tusk has been known in the Mediterraneam area since the bronze age. It was later also employed in the graeco-roman culture. Obviously ceramic pyxides were also discovered, some decorated with polichromy just as other greek vases, others made of metal with a relief or carved decoration. That cylyndric form of a vessel was also aspecially popular during the late antic, beginning from the 4th century. Dur- ing that time reliefs with christian themes started to appear in pyxis decoration As we know it is a tooth (tusk) and has characterystics specyfic for that organ – it is built of enamel, dentine and tooth pulp with neural tissue. Any craftsmanship items are only made of hard dentine that encircles the tooth pulp at the base of the tusk. From this particular section, after sawing the tusk sidewise, it is possible to receive an item simillar in shape to a cylinder empty inside. A bottom part and cover made of other sections of the tusk are fitted to this semi-finished product, thus producing a pecious box.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Sophocles' Philoctetes Roisman, Hanna M Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1997; 38, 2; Proquest Pg
    The appropriation of a son: Sophocles' Philoctetes Roisman, Hanna M Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1997; 38, 2; ProQuest pg. 127 The Appropriation of a Son: Sophocles' Philoctetes Hanna M. Roisman ANHOOD in archaic and classical Greece-as in modern times-is generally manifested not so much in relation­ M ships with women as in relationships with other men, especially in the relationship between father and son. The Greek male is expected to produce sons who will continue his oikos (e.g. Soph. Ant. 641-45; Eur. Ale. 62lf, 654-57). Further, as Hesiod makes clear, sons should resemble their fathers in both looks and conduct, especially the latter (Op. 182,235; ef Ii. 6.476-81; Theophr. Char. 5.5). Such resemblance earns the father public esteem and proves his manliness; the lack of it may be cause for disparagement and calls his manliness into question. 1 We learn from Ajax and Philoctetes that Sophocles follows the Hesiodic imperative that sons should resemble their fathers in their natures and their accomplishments. Ajax sees himself as an unworthy son, having lost Achilles' arms to Odysseus, and prefers to commit suicide rather than face his father, Telamon, who took part in Heracles' expedition to Troy and got Hesione, the best part of the booty, as a reward (Aj. 430-40,462-65, 470ff, 1300-303; Diod. 4.32.5). At the same time, he expects his son, Eurysaces, to be like himself in nature, valor, and in everything else ('ttl.~' aA.A.' OIlOlO~, Aj. 545-51). Sophocles' Philoctetes, on the other hand, presents the strug­ gle between Odysseus and Philoctetes for the 'paternity' of Neoptolemus, as each tries to mold the young man in his own 1 Even in contemporary Greece the intense male rivalry for proving oneself takes place among men alone, while women and flocks serve as the object of this rivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual of the British School at Athens A
    The Annual of the British School at Athens http://journals.cambridge.org/ATH Additional services for The Annual of the British School at Athens: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here A Visit to Cyrene in 1895 Herbert Weld-Blundell The Annual of the British School at Athens / Volume 2 / November 1896, pp 113 - 140 DOI: 10.1017/S0068245400007115, Published online: 18 October 2013 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0068245400007115 How to cite this article: Herbert Weld-Blundell (1896). A Visit to Cyrene in 1895. The Annual of the British School at Athens, 2, pp 113-140 doi:10.1017/S0068245400007115 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/ATH, IP address: 131.173.48.20 on 15 Apr 2015 ' itfS i^>- tv lli-JOTb. V**»-iJ IhUS ntt < POINTS'Si/HEHCEl PHOTMOHAPMS ARE British School at Athens, Annual II. PLATE IV. RUINS OF CYRENE: GENERAL PLAN. A VISIT TO CYRENE IN 1895. A VISIT TO CYRENE IN 1895. BY HERBERT WELD-BLUNDELL. PLATE IV. THE difficulties that hedged round the Garden of the Hes- perides in the Greek seem still destined to make the Cyrenaica, a country to which the eyes of archaeologists have so wistfully turned, almost as inaccessible to the modern traveller as to the heroes of ancient fable. The classic maidens have vanished, the Garden is some- what run to seed, but the dragon of early legend is there, in the person of the native official who guards the historical treasures that lie strewn over the rich sites of the Pentapolis, stately tombs that worthless Arabs kennel in or plunder for statues and vases, to be peddled to Maltese or Greeks for (literally) home consumption or foreign export.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limits of Communication Between Mortals and Immortals in the Homeric Hymns
    Body Language: The Limits of Communication between Mortals and Immortals in the Homeric Hymns. Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bridget Susan Buchholz, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Sarah Iles Johnston Fritz Graf Carolina López-Ruiz Copyright by Bridget Susan Buchholz 2009 Abstract This project explores issues of communication as represented in the Homeric Hymns. Drawing on a cognitive model, which provides certain parameters and expectations for the representations of the gods, in particular, for the physical representations their bodies, I examine the anthropomorphic representation of the gods. I show how the narratives of the Homeric Hymns represent communication as based upon false assumptions between the mortals and immortals about the body. I argue that two methods are used to create and maintain the commonality between mortal bodies and immortal bodies; the allocation of skills among many gods and the transference of displays of power to tools used by the gods. However, despite these techniques, the texts represent communication based upon assumptions about the body as unsuccessful. Next, I analyze the instances in which the assumed body of the god is recognized by mortals, within a narrative. This recognition is not based upon physical attributes, but upon the spoken self identification by the god. Finally, I demonstrate how successful communication occurs, within the text, after the god has been recognized. Successful communication is represented as occurring in the presence of ritual references.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucan's Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulf
    Lucan’s Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2014 Reading Committee: Catherine Connors, Chair Alain Gowing Stephen Hinds Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Classics © Copyright 2014 Laura Zientek University of Washington Abstract Lucan’s Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Catherine Connors Department of Classics This dissertation is an analysis of the role of landscape and the natural world in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. I investigate digressions and excurses on mountains, rivers, and certain myths associated aetiologically with the land, and demonstrate how Stoic physics and cosmology – in particular the concepts of cosmic (dis)order, collapse, and conflagration – play a role in the way Lucan writes about the landscape in the context of a civil war poem. Building on previous analyses of the Bellum Civile that provide background on its literary context (Ahl, 1976), on Lucan’s poetic technique (Masters, 1992), and on landscape in Roman literature (Spencer, 2010), I approach Lucan’s depiction of the natural world by focusing on the mutual effect of humanity and landscape on each other. Thus, hardships posed by the land against characters like Caesar and Cato, gloomy and threatening atmospheres, and dangerous or unusual weather phenomena all have places in my study. I also explore how Lucan’s landscapes engage with the tropes of the locus amoenus or horridus (Schiesaro, 2006) and elements of the sublime (Day, 2013).
    [Show full text]