SPENCER the FOUNTAIN Ptns UNO PANAMA SIGNS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Captain Arthur Rostron
CAPTAIN ARTHUR ROSTRON CARPATHIA Created by: Jonathon Wild Campaign Director – Maelstrom www.maelstromdesign.co.uk CONTENTS 1 CAPTAIN ARTHUR ROSTRON………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………3-6 CUNARD LINE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7-8 CAPTAIN ARTHUR ROSTRON CONT…….….……………………………………………………………………………………………………….8-9 RMS CARPATHIA…………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………….9-10 SINKING OF THE RMS TITANIC………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…11-17 CAPTAIN ARTHUR ROSTRON CONT…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….18-23 R.M.S CARPATHIA – Copyright shipwreckworld.com 2 CAPTAIN ARTHUR ROSTRON Sir Arthur Henry Rostron, KBE, RD, RND, was a seafaring officer working for the Cunard Line. Up until 1912, he was an unknown person apart from in nautical circles and was a British sailor that had served in the British Merchant Navy and the Royal Naval Reserve for many years. However, his name is now part of the grand legacy of the Titanic story. The Titanic needs no introduction, it is possibly the most known single word used that can bring up memories of the sinking of the ship for the relatives, it will reveal a story that is still known and discussed to this day. And yet, Captain Rostron had no connections with the ship, or the White Star Line before 1912. On the night of 14th/15th April 1912, because of his selfless actions, he would be best remembered as the Captain of the RMS Carpathia who rescued many hundreds of people from the sinking of the RMS Titanic, after it collided with an iceberg in the middle of the North Atlantic Ocean. Image Copyright 9gag.com Rostron was born in Bolton on the 14th May 1869 in the town of Bolton. His birthplace was at Bank Cottage, Sharples to parents James and Nancy Rostron. -
Coordination Failure and the Sinking of Titanic
The Sinking of the Unsinkable Titanic: Mental Inertia and Coordination Failures Fu-Lai Tony Yu Department of Economics and Finance Hong Kong Shue Yan University Abstract This study investigates the sinking of the Titanic from the theory of human agency derived from Austrian economics, interpretation sociology and organizational theories. Unlike most arguments in organizational and management sciences, this study offers a subjectivist perspective of mental inertia to understand the Titanic disaster. Specifically, this study will argue that the fall of the Titanic was mainly due to a series of coordination and judgment failures that occurred simultaneously. Such systematic failures were manifested in the misinterpretations of the incoming events, as a result of mental inertia, by all parties concerned in the fatal accident, including lookouts, telegram officers, the Captain, lifeboat crewmen, architects, engineers, senior management people and owners of the ship. This study concludes that no matter how successful the past is, we should not take experience for granted entirely. Given the uncertain future, high alertness to potential dangers and crises will allow us to avoid iceberg mines in the sea and arrived onshore safely. Keywords: The R.M.S. Titanic; Maritime disaster; Coordination failure; Mental inertia; Judgmental error; Austrian and organizational economics 1. The Titanic Disaster So this is the ship they say is unsinkable. It is unsinkable. God himself could not sink this ship. From Butler (1998: 39) [The] Titanic… will stand as a monument and warning to human presumption. The Bishop of Winchester, Southampton, 1912 Although the sinking of the Royal Mail Steamer Titanic (thereafter as the Titanic) is not the largest loss of life in maritime history1, it is the most famous one2. -
Papéis Normativos E Práticas Sociais
Agnes Ayres (1898-194): Rodolfo Valentino e Agnes Ayres em “The Sheik” (1921) The Donovan Affair (1929) The Affairs of Anatol (1921) The Rubaiyat of a Scotch Highball Broken Hearted (1929) Cappy Ricks (1921) (1918) Bye, Bye, Buddy (1929) Too Much Speed (1921) Their Godson (1918) Into the Night (1928) The Love Special (1921) Sweets of the Sour (1918) The Lady of Victories (1928) Forbidden Fruit (1921) Coals for the Fire (1918) Eve's Love Letters (1927) The Furnace (1920) Their Anniversary Feast (1918) The Son of the Sheik (1926) Held by the Enemy (1920) A Four Cornered Triangle (1918) Morals for Men (1925) Go and Get It (1920) Seeking an Oversoul (1918) The Awful Truth (1925) The Inner Voice (1920) A Little Ouija Work (1918) Her Market Value (1925) A Modern Salome (1920) The Purple Dress (1918) Tomorrow's Love (1925) The Ghost of a Chance (1919) His Wife's Hero (1917) Worldly Goods (1924) Sacred Silence (1919) His Wife Got All the Credit (1917) The Story Without a Name (1924) The Gamblers (1919) He Had to Camouflage (1917) Detained (1924) In Honor's Web (1919) Paging Page Two (1917) The Guilty One (1924) The Buried Treasure (1919) A Family Flivver (1917) Bluff (1924) The Guardian of the Accolade (1919) The Renaissance at Charleroi (1917) When a Girl Loves (1924) A Stitch in Time (1919) The Bottom of the Well (1917) Don't Call It Love (1923) Shocks of Doom (1919) The Furnished Room (1917) The Ten Commandments (1923) The Girl Problem (1919) The Defeat of the City (1917) The Marriage Maker (1923) Transients in Arcadia (1918) Richard the Brazen (1917) Racing Hearts (1923) A Bird of Bagdad (1918) The Dazzling Miss Davison (1917) The Heart Raider (1923) Springtime à la Carte (1918) The Mirror (1917) A Daughter of Luxury (1922) Mammon and the Archer (1918) Hedda Gabler (1917) Clarence (1922) One Thousand Dollars (1918) The Debt (1917) Borderland (1922) The Girl and the Graft (1918) Mrs. -
Saving the Survivors Transferring to Steam Passenger Ships When He Joined the White Star Line in 1880
www.BretwaldaBooks.com @Bretwaldabooks bretwaldabooks.blogspot.co.uk/ Bretwalda Books on Facebook First Published 2020 Text Copyright © Rupert Matthews 2020 Rupert Matthews asserts his moral rights to be regarded as the author of this book. All rights reserved. No reproduction of any part of this publication is permitted without the prior written permission of the publisher: Bretwalda Books Unit 8, Fir Tree Close, Epsom, Surrey KT17 3LD [email protected] www.BretwaldaBooks.com ISBN 978-1-909698-63-5 Historian Rupert Matthews is an established public speaker, school visitor, history consultant and author of non-fiction books, magazine articles and newspaper columns. His work has been translated into 28 languages (including Sioux). Looking for a speaker who will engage your audience with an amusing, interesting and informative talk? Whatever the size or make up of your audience, Rupert is an ideal speaker to make your event as memorable as possible. Rupert’s talks are lively, informative and fun. They are carefully tailored to suit audiences of all backgrounds, ages and tastes. Rupert has spoken successfully to WI, Probus, Round Table, Rotary, U3A and social groups of all kinds as well as to lecture groups, library talks and educational establishments.All talks come in standard 20 minute, 40 minute and 60 minute versions, plus questions afterwards, but most can be made to suit any time slot you have available. 3 History Talks The History of Apples : King Arthur – Myth or Reality? : The History of Buttons : The Escape of Charles II - an oak tree, a smuggling boat and more close escapes than you would believe. -
Hollywood Theology: the Commodification of Religion in Twentieth-Century Films Author(S): Jeffery A
Center for the Study of Religion and American Culture Hollywood Theology: The Commodification of Religion in Twentieth-Century Films Author(s): Jeffery A. Smith Reviewed work(s): Source: Religion and American Culture: A Journal of Interpretation, Vol. 11, No. 2 (Summer 2001), pp. 191-231 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Center for the Study of Religion and American Culture Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/rac.2001.11.2.191 . Accessed: 29/01/2013 11:41 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and Center for the Study of Religion and American Culture are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Religion and American Culture: A Journal of Interpretation. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:41:14 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Hollywood Theology: The Commodication of Religion in Twentieth-Century Films Jeffery A. Smith A motion picture is a product formed by the intricate inter- play of lm industry forces and cultural expectations. Hollywood must attract audiences and audiences crave gratication or, perhaps, edication. -
The Contributions of James F. Neill to the Development of the Modern Ameri Can Theatrical Stock Company
This dissertation has been 65—1234 microfilmed exactly as received ZUCCHERO, William Henry, 1930- THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF JAMES F. NEILL TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODERN AMERI CAN THEATRICAL STOCK COMPANY. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1964 Speech—Theater University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Copyright by William Henry Zucchero 1965 THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF JAMES F. NEILL TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODERN AMERICAN THEATRICAL STOCK COMPANY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By William Henry Zucchero, B.S., M.A. * * * * * $ The Ohio State University 1964 Approved by PLEASE NOTE: Plates are not original copy. Some are blurred and indistinct. Filmed as received. UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS, INC. PREFACE Appreciation is extended to the individuals, named below, for the aid each has given in the research, prepara tion, and execution of this study. The gathering of pertinent information on James F. Neill, his family, and his early life, was made possible through the efforts of Mrs. Eugene A. Stanley of the Georgia Historical Society, Mr. C. Robert Jones (Director, the Little Theatre of Savannah, Inc.), Miss Margaret Godley of the Savannah Public Library, Mr. Frank Rossiter (columnist, The Savannah Morning News). Mrs. Gae Decker (Savannah Chamber of Commerce), Mr. W. M. Crane (University of Georgia Alumni Association), Mr. Don Williams (member of Sigma Alpha Epsilon— Neill’s college fraternity), and Mr. Alfred Kent Mordecai of Savannah, Georgia. For basic research on the operation of the Neill company, and information on stock companies, in general, aid was provided by Mrs. -
The Controversy Lives On
Chapter XVII THE CONTROVERSY LIVES ON Two major inquiries took place following the loss of Titanic. The first began in America on Friday, April 19, 1912, when a subcommittee of the United States Senate Committee on Commerce started to take testimony from J. Bruce Ismay, who was the Managing Director of the White Star Line and a Titanic survivor. The second major inquiry, conducted in Britain, began on Thursday, May 2, 1912, with a review of the order for a formal investigation into the loss of Titanic by the Board of Trade. The first witness called before the Wreck Commissioner’s Court the following day was Titanic’s lookout Archie Jewell. With regard to witnesses from Californian, only three were called before the US Senate inquiry in America, all on Friday, April 26, 1912. They were Second Donkeyman Ernest Gill, who was followed later that day by Captain Stanley Lord, and then by Wireless Operator Cyril Evans. In addition to these three Californian witnesses, influential input regarding the possible whereabouts of Californian was provided to the Senate investigation by US Navy Captain John Knapp of the Bureau of Navigation’s Hydrographic Office on Saturday, May 18, 1912. Appearing before the British Wreck Commission inquiry from Californian were seven witnesses.1 First to testify was Captain Stanley Lord, who was followed by Apprentice James Gibson, and then by Second Officer Herbert Stone on Tuesday, May 14, 1912. The next to testify were Third Officer Charles Groves, followed by Chief Officer George Stewart, and then by Wireless Operator Cyril Evans on Wednesday, May 15, 1912. -
Material INDEX
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT No matter how much hard work and countless of hours are put into creating a book such as this, its ultimate success depends on more than the work a single individual. In particular, I would like to thank George Behe and Bill Wormstedt for their unflinching encouragement and support from the very start of this project. Not only did they both take many hours of their own time to painstakingly proofread this work, but they also provided me with many constructive ideas and creative suggestions along the way. I would also like to thank Dr. Paul Lee for sharing a scan of the original handwritten wireless log of the SS Birma with me, and for discussing the various entries that were written on it. His own book, The Titanic and the Indifferent Stranger, is extremely well researched and is highly recommended reading for any serious student of the Californian affair. Another resource of information worth mentioning was Dave Bilnitzer’s former website, “The Titanic and the Mystery Ship,” which examined various arguments put forth by various authors of the Californian affair, and allowed the reader to compare those arguments with verbatim extracts from the 1912 inquiries and other contemporary sources. In addition to the above, I would also like to thank Tim Maltin for providing me with copies of Almerian’s Greenwich Mean Noon Observations and Daily Journal forms for her April 1912 eastbound voyage that he uncovered, and for letting me include them in my articles and books. I would also like to thank Bruce Beveridge for allowing me to use his general arrangement plans of Titanic on more than one occasion in many of my publications, and to thank those in charge of the Dundee City Archives for providing me with a copy of the original design plans of the SS Californian for use in my research and published work. -
What Sank the Titanic?
Volume 21, Number 4, April 2012 Physics in the news What sank the Titanic? Mike Follows Just over a century ago, the RMS (Royal Mail Steamer) Titanic sank on its maiden voyage, an event that shocked a public that had been led to believe that it was ‘unsinkable’. At 11.40 p.m. on Sunday 14 April 1912, bound for New York from Southampton, Titanic struck an iceberg and sank within 3 hours, taking two-thirds of her 2224 passengers and crew to a watery grave just off the Grand Banks of Newfoundland. Titanic has attracted its share of conspiracy theories. These include the downright bizarre — like the curse of Amen-Ra: http://www.titanicandco.com/curse.html as well as the more plausible, such as the theory outlined by Robin Gardiner in his book, Titanic: The Ship That Never Sank?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdxJp2fVXJ8 However, as we shall see, some simple physics may have doomed the Titanic to an icy grave 4 kilometres down in the North Atlantic. Did the Moon sink the Titanic? A recent article in Sky & Telescope magazine discusses the coincidence of three astronomical events in early January 1912 that may have increased the number of icebergs crossing the path of Titanic 3 months later. You can read the article at: http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/147339175.html?pageSize=0 The events are summarised in this table: Astronomical event Date and time Spring tide (full Moon) 4 January 1912, 13h 29m UT Earth at perihelion 3 January 1912, 10h 44m UT Lunar perigee 4 January 1912, 13h 35m UT The Sun and Moon were lined up on opposite sides of the Earth, creating a spring tide. -
What Women Wrote: Scenarios, 1912-1929
A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of WHAT WOMEN WROTE: SCENARIOS, 1912-1929 UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA Jeanie MacPherson in her office at the De Mille Studio, where she is a special scenarist for Cecil B. De Mille (undated) Photo courtesy of Museum of Modem Art/Film Stills Archive A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of CINEMA HISTORY MICROFILM SERIES Series Editor: Ann Martin WHAT WOMEN WROTE: SCENARIOS, 1912-1929 Edited by Ann Martin and Virginia M. Clark A microfilm project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA 44 North Market Street • Frederick, MD 21701 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publicatioo Data What women wrote [microform] scenarios, 1912-1929/edited by Ann Martin and Virginia M. Clark. microfilm reels. -(Cinema history microfilm series) Scenarios are part of the deposits of the Copyright Office. Accompanied by a printed reel guide. Bibliography: p. x Includes index. ISBN 0-89093-988-8 (microfilm) 1. Motion picture plays-Women authors. 2. American drama-Women authors. 3. American drama-20th century. I. Martin, Ann. II. Clark, Virginia M. (Virginia Martha) III. Schlesinger, Maria, 1965- . IV. University Publications of America. V. Library of Congress. Copyright Office. VI. Series. [PN1997.A1] 812,.03,089287-dcl9 88-17191 CIP Copyright ® 1987 by University Publications of America. All rights reserved. ISBN 0-89093-988-8. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction v Selected Bibliography x Reel Index Reel 1, 1912-1920 1 Reel 2, 1920 cont.-1924 10 1927-1929 15 Scenarist Index 19 Title Index 29 INTRODUCTION "Mrs. Beranger [having been selected for a screen test] sought out Jesse Lasky and waved the little notice at him: 'What would you say if I became a movie star?' 'That's out,' Jesse replied. -
Did These Sink the Titanic?
Mike The Moon, an optical illusion and an iceberg Follows Did these sink the Titanic? The Titanic in Cobh Just over one century ago the RMS Titanic sank Harbour, Ireland, just on her maiden voyage, an event that shocked two days before she sank a public that had been led to believe she was ‘unsinkable’. At 11:40 pm on Sunday 14 April 1912, while bound for New York from Key words Southampton and steaming at nearly 22½ knots pressure just off the Grand Banks of Newfoundland, she strength struck an iceberg. She sank just three hours later, tides taking two-thirds of her 2224 passengers and refraction crew to a watery grave. Titanic has attracted her share of conspiracy theories but some simple Physics may have doomed the Titanic to her resting place four kilometres below the surface of the North Atlantic. The ‘unsinkable’ ship A complex metal joint, held together by rivets. The hull of a ship can be divided into a series of Titanic’s hull was composed of mild steel plates compartments by partitions called bulkheads. If held together by three million rivets. A rivet these bulkheads are watertight, a ship can stay consists of a smooth cylindrical shaft with a afloat even when some of the compartments head at one end. It is heated until it is red-hot so are flooded. Titanic was divided into 16 that it expands. Then it is hammered into a hole compartments. She was designed to float with that has been punched through two overlapping flooding of any two compartments or, because plates. -
Navigational Inconsistencies of the Ss Californian
NAVIGATIONAL INCONSISTENCIES OF THE SS CALIFORNIAN by Samuel Halpern The Leyland Liner SS Californian began her sixth voyage under the command of Captain Stanley Lord on April 5th 1912. She was bound from London to Boston. Her planned route of travel would first take her from her berth at No. 24 Shed in the Royal Albert Dock in London to a point just off Bishop Rock (49° 52’ N, 6° 27’ W) at the westernmost tip of the Isles of Scilly, a distance of about 400 nautical miles. After taking departure off Bishop Rock, the official starting point of her transatlantic crossing, Californian would travel 1,734 nautical miles along a great circle route to a turning point in the North Atlantic known as “the corner” at 42° 00’ N, 47° 00’ W.1 From there she would go another 1,067 nautical miles on a fixed course heading of 271° true to the Boston Light Vessel located at a distance of about 15 miles from Boston’s famed Custom House. Arrival at the light vessel would mark the official end point of the transatlantic crossing. From the light vessel she then would go on to the Clyde Street pier of the Boston and Albany docks in East Boston. The planned route of the Californian as well as the planned route of the White Star Liner SS Titanic are shown in the diagram below. NAVIGATIONAL EVIDENCE AND INCONSISTENCIES Navigational evidence from the official logbook of the Californian was presented by Capt. Stanley Lord before the American Inquiry on April 26, 1912, and from both Capt.