DOCSLIB.ORG

Seamount Physiography and Biology in the North-East Atlantic and Open Access Open Access Mediterranean Sea Earth System Earth System Dynamics 1 1 1 1 2 Dynamics3 1 T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EGU Journal Logos (RGB) Open Access Open Access Open Access Advances in Annales Nonlinear Processes Geosciences Geophysicae in Geophysics Open Access Open Access Natural Hazards Natural Hazards and Earth System and Earth System Sciences Sciences Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric Chemistry Chemistry and Physics and Physics Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric Measurement Measurement Techniques Techniques Discussions Open Access Biogeosciences, 10, 3039–3054, 2013 Open Access www.biogeosciences.net/10/3039/2013/ Biogeosciences doi:10.5194/bg-10-3039-2013 Biogeosciences Discussions © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Open Access Open Access Climate Climate of the Past of the Past Discussions Seamount physiography and biology in the north-east Atlantic and Open Access Open Access Mediterranean Sea Earth System Earth System Dynamics 1 1 1 1 2 Dynamics3 1 T. Morato , K. Ø. Kvile , G. H. Taranto , F. Tempera , B. E. Narayanaswamy , D. Hebbeln , G. M. Menezes , Discussions C. Wienberg3, R. S. Santos1, and T. J. Pitcher1,4 1Centre of IMAR of the University of the Azores, Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas and LARSyS Associated Open Access Open Access Laboratory, Universidade dos Ac¸ores, 9901-382 Horta, Portugal Geoscientific Geoscientific 2SAMS, Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Argyll,Instrumentation Scotland Instrumentation 3MARUM, Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Leobener Straße,Methods 28359 Bremen, and Germany 4 Methods and Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Data Systems Data Systems Correspondence to: T. Morato ([email protected]) Discussions Open Access Open Access Geoscientific Received: 23 November 2012 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 20 December 2012 Geoscientific Revised: 8 March 2013 – Accepted: 8 April 2013 – Published: 6 May 2013 Model Development Model Development Discussions Abstract. This work aims at characterising the seamount 1 Introduction Open Access physiography and biology in the OSPAR Convention limits Open Access (north-east Atlantic Ocean) and Mediterranean Sea. We first Hydrology and Hydrology and inferred potential abundance, location and morphological Seamounts are commonEarth underwater System features in the world Earth System characteristics of seamounts, and secondly, summarized the oceans and are traditionally described as isolated elevations existing biological, geological and oceanographic in situ re- greater than 1000 m in relief aboveSciences the seafloor (Menard, Sciences search, identifying examples of well-studied seamounts. Our 1964; International Hydrographic Organization, 2008). How- Discussions Open Access study showed that the seamount population in the OSPAR ever, no ecological rationale seems to support theOpen Access traditional area (north-east Atlantic) and in the Mediterranean Sea is size limit (Pitcher et al., 2007; Wessel, 2007) and this defi- Ocean Science large with around 557 and 101 seamount-like features, re- nition has been extensivelyOcean modified Science in the literature to bet- Discussions spectively. Similarly, seamounts occupy large areas of about ter satisfy the needs of different disciplines (Staudigel et al., 616 000 km2 in the OSPAR region and of about 89 500 km2 2010). Since small underwater features may also play an im- in the Mediterranean Sea. The presence of seamounts in the portant role in deep and high sea ecosystems (e.g. Koslow Open Access Open Access north-east Atlantic has been known since the late 19th cen- et al., 2001), we considered features greater than 100 m in tury, but overall knowledge regarding seamount ecology and height as small seamounts and defined elevations taller than Solid Earth 1000 m as large seamounts (sensuSolid Pitcher Earth et al., 2007). geology is still relatively poor. Only 37 seamounts in the Discussions OSPAR area (3.5 % of all seamounts in the region), 22 in The total number of seamounts at a global scale has been the Mediterranean Sea (9.2 % of all seamounts in the region) estimated in several studies mainly by running mathematical algorithms on global bathymetry grids inferred from satellite and 25 in the north-east Atlantic south of the OSPAR area Open Access Open Access have in situ information. Seamounts mapped in both areas altimetry and acoustic soundings (e.g. Kitchingman and Lai, are in general very heterogeneous, showing diverse geophys- 2004; Wessel et al., 2010; Kim and Wessel, 2011; Yesson The Cryosphere et al., 2011). Currently,The these Cryosphere approaches are unable to ade- ical characteristics. These differences will likely affect the bi- Discussions ological diversity and production of resident and associated quately detect small and deep peaks, and thus the estimates of organisms. the global abundance of seamounts still bear large uncertain- ties. A more accurate approach would be to locate seamounts on bathymetry grids originated by shipboard bathymetric profiles. However, the small area of the ocean floor explored using multibeam bathymetry prevents improved analyses of seamount location, morphology and abundance (Hillier and Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 3040 T. Morato et al.: Seamount physiography and biology in the north-east Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea Watts, 2007). Recent estimates of the number of seamounts some vulnerable marine ecosystems (Pitcher et al., 2010; worldwide range from about 25 000 to about 140 000 large Taranto et al., 2012; FAO, 2009). Therefore, some actions features and potentially from 125 000 to 25 million small have been taken to regulate the use of seamount resources seamounts or knolls greater than 100 m in height (Wessel et (NEAFC, 2011; Santos et al., 2009, 2010; Morato et al., al., 2010; Kim and Wessel, 2011; Yesson et al., 2011). De- 2010c). Major concerns are related to seamount fishing, espe- spite this imprecision, such estimates highlight seamounts as cially trawling that physically destroys reef-building organ- one of the most prevalent set of habitats of the seabed, form- isms (Williams et al., 2010), disturbs the abundant seamount ing one of the largest biomes on earth with about 28.8 million filter feeding communities by sediment re-suspension (Clark km2 (Etnoyer et al., 2010). et al., 2010), and selectively removes long-lived commer- The Oslo–Paris Convention for the Protection of the Ma- cially valuable fish species (Pitcher, 2010) that are extremely rine Environment of the north-east Atlantic (OSPAR; http: vulnerable to heavy fishing (Morato et al., 2006). Besides //www.ospar.org) is an international legal instrument made fisheries, deep-sea mining is an emerging issue in seamount of representatives of the governments of 15 Contracting management that may seriously affect seamount ecosystems Parties and the European Commission. OSPAR has in- in the future (Halfar and Fujita, 2007; Hein et al., 2010; He cluded seamounts in the list of threatened and/or declining et al., 2011; Van Dover, 2011). habitats and defined these features as undersea mountains However, not all seamounts share the same set of proper- whose summits rise more than 1000 m above the surround- ties and threats (Rowden et al., 2005; Morato et al., 2010b; ing seafloor (OSPAR, 2008). The official OSPAR database Clark et al., 2012; Taranto et al., 2012). Therefore, a clear (consulted in September 2011) included 104 seamounts in understanding of spatial patterns of threats, biological diver- the high seas and territorial waters of Norway, Sweden, Faroe sity, production and geophysical properties is crucial for the Islands, UK, Ireland, France, Spain and Portugal. They are, success of conservation and management actions (Morato et however, still underestimated since many more seamounts al., 2010c), and for the understanding of oceanographic, geo- are known in the Mid-Atlantic Ridge or in many exclusive logical and ecological processes associated with seamounts. economic zones (EEZs). For example, from the Kitchingman This work aims at characterising the seamount physiogra- et al. (2007) dataset there may be at least 339 large seamounts phy and biology in OSPAR area, the north-east Atlantic, and in the OSPAR area and about 59 in the Mediterranean Sea. the Mediterranean Sea. We first inferred potential abundance, More recently, Kim and Wessel (2011) estimated the number location and morphological characteristics of seamounts in of seamounts greater than 1000 m in height in the OSPAR the OSPAR area and Mediterranean waters applying a detec- area as 132 (850 greater than 500 m), while they consider no tion model on the latest bathymetric information available. seamounts to occur in the Mediterranean Sea. However, these Secondly, we summarized the existing biological, geologi- estimates were based on global bathymetry datasets that did cal and oceanographic in situ research, pointing out gaps in not consider the most recent multibeam bathymetry surveys seamount investigation, potentially distinctive features and conducted in the region. examples of well-studied seamounts. In this way, we hope Recently, the importance of seamount ecosystems has to achieve a snapshot of the knowledge status of seamount been recognized by the scientific community, management ecosystems in the north-east Atlantic and Mediterranean ar- authorities, industry and conservation initiatives (Stocks et eas, which may represent basic information on which to build al., 2012). Properties associated with underwater reliefs
Recommended publications
  • Inferences on Potential Seamount Locations from Mid-Resolution

    Inferences on Potential Seamount Locations from Mid-Resolution

    T. Morato and D. Pauly (eds.), Seamounts: Biodiversity and Fisheries, Page 7 INFERENCES ON POTENTIAL SEAMOUNT LOCATIONS FROM MID- RESOLUTION BATHYMETRIC DATA Adrian Kitchingman and Sherman Lai Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia. 2259 Lower Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z4, Canada [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT Seamounts are underwater volcanoes that did not grow tall enough to break to the sea surface and turn into islands. Once formed, seamounts tend to gradually sink under their own weight and the subsidence of the lithosphere. The ocean floor is littered with these former seamounts, here called ‘seamounds’. Seamounts occur throughout the world's oceans, but their number (which may surpass 50,000) is difficult to estimate, even roughly, because it depends on the resolution of the bathymetric map used and the specific definition of a seamount used, i.e., the limits used to distinguish between seamounts and seamounds. Here, the locations of a subset of the seamounts of the world were identified using two algorithms relying on the depth differences between adjacent cells of a digital global elevation map distributed by the U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA). The overlap of both algorithms resulted in a set of about 14,000 seamounts, but a different number would have been found had we used different thresholds. Known seamount locations supplied by NOAA and SeamountsOnline (http://seamounts.sdsc.edu) were compared against the corresponding seamounts located by the study, which led to some degree of ground-truthing. The coordinates of the seamounts identified in this study are available on the CD-ROM attached to this report, and on http://www.seaaroundus.org.
  • Executive Summary of the Partial Submission

    Executive Summary of the Partial Submission

    Partial Submission of the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark together with the Government of Greenland to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf The North-Eastern Continental Shelf of Greenland 30°W 20°W 10°W 0° 10°E 20°E F r a m S 30°W S t v r a a i l t b a a e S 80°N GR No r d s r t t H K n h -E as ov e E ga n r a rd Ridge a i B ENLAND t G p 20°E Boreas Basin o ree v i nla c 75°N h n E d a s R S t hel G i r d e f e g n e l a n d R i n i d s g a e B d n l a n e e 75°N r G e g d R i Vesteris Seamount 10°E s n h o M 70°N Jan Mayen 20°W 70°N 10°W 0° Executive Summary N The North-Eastern Continental Shelf of Greenland Publisher: Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) Royal Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Building Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark Printers: Rosendahl/Schultz Grafisk, Albertslund, Denmark Printed: October 2013 ISBN: 978-87-7871-368-1 2 Ella Ø with the wintering station for the Lauge Koch expeditions , Central East Greenland Photo: Jakob Lautrup N The North-Eastern Continental Shelf of Greenland Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Maps and Coordinates ......................................................................................................................................................
  • Importance of Seamount-Like Features for Conserving Mediterranean Marine Habitats and Threatened Species

    Importance of Seamount-Like Features for Conserving Mediterranean Marine Habitats and Threatened Species

    Nº. 1105 IMPORTANCE OF SEAMOUNT-LIKE FEATURES FOR CONSERVING MEDITERRANEAN MARINE HABITATS AND THREATENED SPECIES Ricardo Aguilar, Xavier Pastor, Silvia García & Pilar Marín Oceana. Leganitos, 47 - 28013 Madrid. Spain - *[email protected] INTRODUCTION HABITAT LOCATION MAIN SPECIES 16 of the more than 200 seamount‑like peaks in the Mediterranean1 have been observed using ROV. Coral reefs 4, 5, 6, 7 Lophelia pertusa, Madrepora oculata Desmophyllum dianthus, Stenocyathus vermiformis, The findings, which include carnivorous sponges, elasmobranches, coral gardens, sponge aggregations, Cold water corals All sites Caryophyllia spp. Pourtalosmilia anthophyllites, Javania caileti, coralligenous beds, as well as species new to science like the giant foraminifera Spiculosiphon oceana, Anomocora fecunda, Dendrophyllia spp. Paramuricea spp., Eunicella spp., Viminella flagellum, or new to the Mediterranean, like the scleractinian Anomocora fecunda, underscore the importance of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Callogorgia verticillata, Acanthogorgia spp., Placogorgia these geological features as hotspots and shelters/refuges species and habitats that are threatened, in Gorgonian/coral gardens: 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, coronata, Swiftia pallida, Muriceides lepida, Villogorgia regression, or rare in other Mediterranean areas. 12, 13, 14 bebrycoides, Bebryce mollis, Nicella granifera 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, Leiopathes glaberrima, Antipathes dichotoma, Antipathella METHODOLOGY Black corals Since 2006, Oceana has carried out six expeditions in the Mediterranean performing 129 ROV’s dives 9, 11, 15, 16 subpinnata, Parantipathes larix Isidella elongata, Pennatula spp., Pteroeides griseum, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, over 16 seamounts, between ‑37 and ‑638 meters deep. Soft bottoms’ octocorals Virgularia mirabilis, Veretillun cynomorium, Kophobelemnon 9, 11, 14, 16 RESULTS stelliferum, Funiculina quadrangularis 2 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, Asconema setubalense, Phakellia spp., Axinella spp.
  • Chapter 51. Biological Communities on Seamounts and Other Submarine Features Potentially Threatened by Disturbance

    Chapter 51. Biological Communities on Seamounts and Other Submarine Features Potentially Threatened by Disturbance

    Chapter 51. Biological Communities on Seamounts and Other Submarine Features Potentially Threatened by Disturbance Contributors: J. Anthony Koslow, Peter Auster, Odd Aksel Bergstad, J. Murray Roberts, Alex Rogers, Michael Vecchione, Peter Harris, Jake Rice, Patricio Bernal (Co-Lead members) 1. Physical, chemical, and ecological characteristics 1.1 Seamounts Seamounts are predominantly submerged volcanoes, mostly extinct, rising hundreds to thousands of metres above the surrounding seafloor. Some also arise through tectonic uplift. The conventional geological definition includes only features greater than 1000 m in height, with the term “knoll” often used to refer to features 100 – 1000 m in height (Yesson et al., 2011). However, seamounts and knolls do not appear to differ much ecologically, and human activity, such as fishing, focuses on both. We therefore include here all such features with heights > 100 m. Only 6.5 per cent of the deep seafloor has been mapped, so the global number of seamounts must be estimated, usually from a combination of satellite altimetry and multibeam data as well as extrapolation based on size-frequency relationships of seamounts for smaller features. Estimates have varied widely as a result of differences in methodologies as well as changes in the resolution of data. Yesson et al. (2011) identified 33,452 seamount and guyot features > 1000 m in height and 138,412 knolls (100 – 1000 m), whereas Harris et al. (2014) identified 10,234 seamount and guyot features, based on a stricter definition that restricted seamounts to conical forms. Estimates of total abundance range to >100,000 seamounts and to 25 million for features > 100 m in height (Smith 1991; Wessel et al., 2010).
  • Microbiology of Seamounts Is Still in Its Infancy

    Microbiology of Seamounts Is Still in Its Infancy

    or collective redistirbution of any portion of this article by photocopy machine, reposting, or other means is permitted only with the approval of The approval portionthe ofwith any articlepermitted only photocopy by is of machine, reposting, this means or collective or other redistirbution This article has This been published in MOUNTAINS IN THE SEA Oceanography MICROBIOLOGY journal of The 23, Number 1, a quarterly , Volume OF SEAMOUNTS Common Patterns Observed in Community Structure O ceanography ceanography S BY DAVID EmERSON AND CRAIG L. MOYER ociety. © 2010 by The 2010 by O ceanography ceanography O ceanography ceanography ABSTRACT. Much interest has been generated by the discoveries of biodiversity InTRODUCTION S ociety. ociety. associated with seamounts. The volcanically active portion of these undersea Microbial life is remarkable for its resil- A mountains hosts a remarkably diverse range of unusual microbial habitats, from ience to extremes of temperature, pH, article for use and research. this copy in teaching to granted ll rights reserved. is Permission S ociety. ociety. black smokers rich in sulfur to cooler, diffuse, iron-rich hydrothermal vents. As and pressure, as well its ability to persist S such, seamounts potentially represent hotspots of microbial diversity, yet our and thrive using an amazing number or Th e [email protected] to: correspondence all end understanding of the microbiology of seamounts is still in its infancy. Here, we of organic or inorganic food sources. discuss recent work on the detection of seamount microbial communities and the Nowhere are these traits more evident observation that specific community groups may be indicative of specific geochemical than in the deep ocean.
  • The Climate-Sensitive Vesterisbanken Area (Central Greenland Sea): Depositional Environment and Paleoceanography During the Past 250,000 Years

    The Climate-Sensitive Vesterisbanken Area (Central Greenland Sea): Depositional Environment and Paleoceanography During the Past 250,000 Years

    The climate-sensitive Vesterisbanken area (central Greenland Sea): Depositional environment and paleoceanography during the past 250,000 years MARTIN ANTONOW1, PETER MARTIN GOLDSCHMIDT2j3and HELMUT ERLENKEUSER2 1. Freiberg University of Mining and Technology, Institute of Geology, Bernhard-von-Cotta-Str. 2, D-09596 Freiberg, Germany 2. SFB 313, University of Kiel, Heinrich-Hecht-Platz 10, D-24118 Kiel, Germany 3. present address: PCD, Eckernforder Str. 259, D-24119 Kiel, Germany ABSTRACT Sedimentological, micropaleontological and geochemical studies of sediment cores from the Vesterisbanken region were used to reconstruct the sedimentation pattern, depositional history and paleoceanography for this area over the last 250,000 years. The dating and correlation of the sediments were based on oxygen isotope stratigraphy and absolute ages. The hemipelagic deposits near the Vesteris Seamount are characterised by biogenic, ter- restrial and volcanogenic sediment input that varies through time. The area was influenced by sporadic turbidity currents and thermohaline-induced contour currents. Ice-rafted debris occurred nearly throughout the investigated time interval. Primary production was higher during interglacial periods. Filter-feeding epifauna (C. zi~~~t~llt~rst~rji),an indicator of bottom cur- rents, dominated in isotope stages 7 and 5. During deglaciation (stage boundaries 8/7, 6/5 and 2/1, events 3.3 and 3.1), enorinous meltwater inp~~tstabilised the water column, leading to periodic interruptions in deep water renewal. The influence of water masses from the Polar and Atlantic Domains in the Greenland Sea were very variable over time. The oceanic fronts in the Vesterisbanken area were always close together, allowing only a narrow Arctic Domain to exist.
  • The East Greenland Rifted Volcanic Margin

    The East Greenland Rifted Volcanic Margin

    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND BULLETIN 24 • 2011 The East Greenland rifted volcanic margin C. Kent Brooks GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND DANISH MINISTRY OF CLIMATE, ENERGY AND BUILDING 1 Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin 24 Keywords East Greenland, North Atlantic, rifted volcanic margin, large igneous province, LIP, Palaeogene, basalt, syenite, nephelinite, carbona- tite, uplift. Cover Sundown over the nunataks in the Main Basalts (Skrænterne Fm) to the south of Scoresby Sund. Camped on the glacier, the 1965 Ox- ford University East Greenland Expedition travelled and collected from this area on foot, manhauling equipment on the sledge to the left. The expedition results were published in Fawcett et al. (1973). Frontispiece: facing page Mountains of horizontally layered basalt flows rising to about 2000 m on the south side of Scoresby Sund. Typical trap topography as found throughout most of the Kangerlussuaq–Scoresby Sund inland area. Chief editor of this series: Adam A. Garde Editorial board of this series: John A. Korstgård, Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University; Minik Rosing, Geological Museum, University of Copenhagen; Finn Surlyk, Department of Geography and Geology, University of Copenhagen Scientific editor of this volume: Adam A. Garde Editorial secretaries: Jane Holst and Esben W. Glendal Referees: Dennis K. Bird (USA) and Christian Tegner (DK) Illustrations: Eva Melskens with contributions from Adam A. Garde Digital photographic work: Benny Schark Graphic production: Kristian A. Rasmussen Printers: Rosendahls · Schultz Grafisk A/S, Albertslund, Denmark Manuscript received: 1 March 2011 Final version approved: 20 September 2011 Printed: 22 December 2011 ISSN 1604-8156 ISBN 978-87-7871-322-3 Citation of the name of this series It is recommended that the name of this series is cited in full, viz.
  • The Fish Fauna of Ampe`Re Seamount (NE Atlantic) and the Adjacent

    The Fish Fauna of Ampe`Re Seamount (NE Atlantic) and the Adjacent

    Helgol Mar Res (2015) 69:13–23 DOI 10.1007/s10152-014-0413-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The fish fauna of Ampe`re Seamount (NE Atlantic) and the adjacent abyssal plain Bernd Christiansen • Rui P. Vieira • Sabine Christiansen • Anneke Denda • Frederico Oliveira • Jorge M. S. Gonc¸alves Received: 26 March 2014 / Revised: 15 September 2014 / Accepted: 24 September 2014 / Published online: 2 October 2014 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and AWI 2014 Abstract An inventory of benthic and benthopelagic stone’’ hypothesis of species dispersal, some differences fishes is presented as a result of two exploratory surveys can be attributed to the local features of the seamounts. around Ampe`re Seamount, between Madeira and the Por- tuguese mainland, covering water depths from 60 to Keywords Deep sea Á Fish distribution Á Ichthyofauna Á 4,400 m. A total of 239 fishes were collected using dif- Seamounts Á Zoogeography ferent types of sampling gear. Three chondrichthyan spe- cies and 31 teleosts in 21 families were identified. The collections showed a vertical zonation with little overlap, Introduction but indications for an affinity of species to certain water masses were only vague. Although most of the species Due to their vertical range and habitat diversity, seamounts present new records for Ampe`re Seamount, all of them often support high fish diversity, as compared to the sur- have been known for the NE Atlantic; endemic species rounding ocean, and some are known as hotspots of were not found. The comparison with fish communities at endemic species (e.g. Shank 2010; Stocks et al. 2012). other NE Atlantic seamounts indicates that despite a high Seamounts are considered to act as ‘‘stepping stones’’ for ichthyofaunal similarity, which supports the ‘‘stepping species dispersal (Almada et al.
  • Seamounts  What Is a Seamount  How Are Seamounts Formed

    Seamounts  What Is a Seamount  How Are Seamounts Formed

    4/26/10 11. Habitats: Seamounts What is a seamount How are seamounts formed Why are seamounts interesting Seamount Habitat Isolation by distance Stepping Stones and Larval Highways Seamount Fauna Two opposing case seamount studies Anthropogenic impacts to seamounts Dr Rhian G. Waller 28th April 2010 Reading: Samadi et al., 2007 What is a seamount “Mountain rising from the ocean that does not reach sea level” Must rise 1000m above surrounding seafloor Most in deep sea Some do rise to <100m of surface Primarily formed through volcanism Estimated 100,000 seamounts around the globe 60% of those in the Pacific 1 4/26/10 Formation of Seamounts Volcanism, Erosion, Sinking, Plates moving Seamounts ~30,000 seamount globally ~350 ever been visited Kitchingman & Lai, 2004 2 4/26/10 How do we know how many seamounts there are? Soundings Single Beam Slow Multibeam Good for all sizes of seamounts Accurate Slow Satellite altimetry Good for larger seamounts Have to extrapolate for small seamounts The number of seamounts rises, and falls…. Why are seamounts interesting? Majority of the deep sea is abyssal sediments Small “oasis” of life Hydrothermal Vents Seamounts Why are seamounts so biodiverse? High currents Current “forced” around seamounts High nutrients Rich, cold upwelling 3 4/26/10 Why are seamounts interesting? Taylor Column Coriolis Effect Retains water on top of seamount Retain plankton/larvae Highly productive waters High primary production High Transient Feeders Tuna, whales Seamount Habitats
  • Seamount Summary Points

    Seamount Summary Points

    Seamount summary points • Seamount classification system • Four key steps were identified in a process to identify and select potential Marine Protected Areas on seamounts (at the scale of an entire seamount as a minimum unit). • Define sets of physical characteristics to identify a range of habitat types • Determine the level of replication required in each category from (1) • Determine the reserve size (30–50% of management area) • The general principle involved here is the use of physical information as a proxy for grouping seamounts in a biologically meaningful way. For most oceanic areas, there are few biological data, but knowledge of physical characteristics is more available, and able to guide seamount classification as a first cut until more information is collected. Seamount definition • Seamounts are defined as geologic features (generally of volcanic origin) extending from the seafloor with an elevation of more than 1000 meters above the abyssal seabed. The principles presented here can and should be applied to features that are geomorphologically distinct from, but ecologically similar to, seamounts. Such features may include: • 1) knolls, vertical elevation of 500-1000m, • 2) Banks • 3) island slopes, • 4) atolls, • 5) continental slope-associated features (e.g. intraplate volcanoes and hills) Seamount habitat type • Substrate type • Sediment type will affect what fauna can occur (although acknowledged that most seamounts will have a wide range of substrate types) • Predominantly hard substrate (basalt, rocky) • Predominantly soft substrate (mud, sand) • Seamount shape • This will in part determine the amount and depth of substrate (especially on summit) • Guyot (flat-topped) • Conical small summit area • Connectivity • Distance between seamounts, and the relationship of seamount direction to current flow will affect the dispersal abilities of fauna • Isolated seamount • Seamount part of a cluster • Seamount part of a linear chain (includes ridge peak system) • Summit depth • Depth is a major determinant of species composition.
  • METEOR-Berichte Mid-Atlantic Expedition 2003-2004 Cruise No

    METEOR-Berichte Mid-Atlantic Expedition 2003-2004 Cruise No

    METEOR-Berichte Mid-Atlantic Expedition 2003-2004 Cruise No. 60, Leg 1 – 5 November 11., 2003 – April 15., 2004 Kiel (Germany) –Funchal - Fort-de-France - Lisbon (Portugal) Autoren: D. Wallace, B. Christansen, J. Phipps-Morgan, Th. Kuhn, U. Send, Editorial Assistance: Senatskommission für Ozeanographie der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft MARUM – Zentrum für Marine Umweltwissenschaften der Universität Bremen Leitstelle Deutsche Forschungsschiffe Institut für Meereskunde der Universität Hamburg 2011 The METEOR-Berichte are published at irregular intervals. They are working papers for people who are occupied with the respective expedition and are intended as reports for the funding institutions. The opinions expressed in the METEOR-Berichte are only those of the authors. The METEOR expeditions are funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). The reports are available in PDF format from http://www.dfg-ozean.de/. Editor: DFG Senatskommission für Ozeanographie c/o MARUM – Zentrum für Marine Umweltwissenschaften Universität Bremen Leobener Strasse 28359 Bremen Authors: Dr. Bernd Christiansen Universität Hamburg Telefon: +49(0)40-42838-6670 Institut für Hydrobiologie und Telefax: +49(0)40-42838-6696 Fischereiwissenschaft e-mail: [email protected] Zeiseweg 9, D-22765 Hamburg / Germany Prof. Dr. Jason Phipps Morgan GEOMAR Telefon: +49(0)431-600 2272 Forschungszentrum für Telefax: +49(0)431-600 2922 Marine Geowissenschaften e-mail: [email protected] Abt. Marine Umweltgeologie Wischhofstr. 1-3 24148 Kiel / Germany Dr. Thomas Kuhn Telefon: +49/(0)3731-393398 Department of Economic Geology and Telefax: +49/(0)3731-392610 Leibniz Lab. for Applied Marine Research e-mail: [email protected] Institute of Mineralogy Freiberg University of Mining and Technology Brennhausgasse 14 D-09596 Freiberg / Germany Prof.
  • Zygomycetes in Vesicular Basanites from Vesteris Seamount, Greenland Basin - a New Type of Cryptoendolithic Fungi

    Zygomycetes in Vesicular Basanites from Vesteris Seamount, Greenland Basin - a New Type of Cryptoendolithic Fungi

    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in PLoS One. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Ivarsson, M., Peckmann, J., Tehler, A., Broman, C., Bach, W. et al. (2015) Zygomycetes in Vesicular Basanites from Vesteris Seamount, Greenland Basin - A New Type of Cryptoendolithic Fungi. PLoS One, 10 http://dx.doi.org/10: e0133368 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-1580 RESEARCH ARTICLE Zygomycetes in Vesicular Basanites from Vesteris Seamount, Greenland Basin – A New Type of Cryptoendolithic Fungi Magnus Ivarsson1*, Jörn Peckmann2, Anders Tehler3, Curt Broman4, Wolfgang Bach5, Katharina Behrens5, Joachim Reitner6, Michael E. Böttcher7, Lena Norbäck Ivarsson8 1 Department of Palaeobiology and the Center for Earth Evolution (NordCEE), Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden, 2 Department of Geodynamics and Sedimentology, Center for Earth Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 3 Department of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden, 4 Department of Geological Sciences, Stockholm University, Svante Arrheniusväg 8, Stockholm, Sweden, 5 MARUM–Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany, 6 Geobiology Group, Geoscience Centre, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany, 7 Geochemistry & Isotope Biogeochemistry Group, Department for Marine Geology, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research (IOW), Warnemünde, Germany, 8 School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Södertörn University, Alfred Nobels Allé 7, Stockholm, Sweden * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Ivarsson M, Peckmann J, Tehler A, Broman C, Bach W, Behrens K, et al.