In This Together

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In This Together MARCH 2021 FEATURING: IN THIS TOGETHER PLUS Geographic Perspective: Honoring the history of Evansville’s legal profession Can a same-sex couple own a home as an estate by the entireties? VOL. 64 NO. 7 POWERING PAYMENTS FOR THE Trust Payment IOLTA Deposit LEGAL Amount $ 1,500.00 INDUSTRY Reference The easiest way to accept credit, NEW CASE debit, and eCheck payments Card Number The ability to accept payments online has **** **** **** 4242 become vital for all firms. When you need to get it right, trust LawPay's proven solution. As the industry standard in legal payments, LawPay is the only payment solution vetted and approved by all 50 state bar associations, 60+ local and specialty bars, the ABA, and the ALA. Developed specifically for the legal industry to ensure trust account compliance and deliver the most secure, PCI-compliant technology, LawPay is proud to be the preferred, long-term payment partner for more than 50,000 law firms. ACCEPT MORE PAYMENTS WITH LAWPAY 866-583-0342 | lawpay.com/inbar VOL. 64 NO. 7 MARCH 2021 COVER STORY 10 IN THIS TOGETHER Four lawyers share their tips for being better practitioners and people By Brandon E. Tate, Heather George Myers, Michael E. Tolbert, and Shelice R. Tolbert CONTENTS STAFF PUBLISHER STATEMENT: Assistant CLE Director: Executive Director: Res Gestae (USPS–462 500) is published Christine Cordial • [email protected] Joe Skeel • [email protected] monthly, except for Jan/ Feb and Jul/Aug, by the Communication Coordinator: Legislative Counsel: ISBA. Periodicals postage Jenna Parsons • [email protected] Paje Felts • [email protected] paid at Indianapolis and additional mailing offices. Communication Manager: Membership Coordinator: POSTMASTER: Send Kelsey Kotnik • [email protected] Julie Gott • [email protected] address changes to Res Gestae, c/o Director of CLE: Office Manager: ISBA, One Indiana Square, Kristin Owens • [email protected] Kimberly Latimore Martin • [email protected] Suite 530, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. Director of Finance & Operations: Outreach Coordinator: DISABILITIES: If you have Sarah Beck • [email protected] Shanae Gay • [email protected] a disability which requires printed materials in Director of Meetings & Events: Receptionist: alternate formats, please Ashley Higgins • [email protected] Chauncey Lipscomb • [email protected] call 800/266 2581 for assistance. Director of Membership: Section & Committee Liaison: Publication of advertise- Carissa Long • [email protected] Rebecca Smith • [email protected] ments is not an implied or direct endorsement of any Director of Outreach & Partnerships | LDA: Section & Committee Manager: product or service offered. Catheryne Pully • [email protected] Leah Baker • [email protected] 3 INBAR.ORGINBAR.ORG • • MARCH 2021 INDIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION The Indiana State Bar Association One Indiana Square, Suite 530 Indianapolis, IN 46204 empowers members to thrive professionally and personally through 800-266-2581 • www.inbar.org advocacy, education, and connections. COLUMN 17 INDIANA COURTHOUSE ART 25 SAME-SEX COUPLE HOMES Indiana Courthouse Art: 66 and Counting! Can a same-sex couple own a home as By Doug Church an estate by the entireties? By Patty Xidias 19 PRO BONO PUBLICO LICENSE Being of Service in Retirement By Marilyn Smith and Judge Martha Blood Wentworth RG STAFF: EDITOR / JENNA PARSONS [email protected] COPYEDITOR / REBECCA TRIMPE [email protected] GRAPHIC DESIGN / BURKHART MARKETING PARTNERS [email protected] WRITTEN PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE CO-CHAIRS / COLIN FLORA & PROF. JOEL SCHUMM [email protected] ADVERTISING / KELSEY KOTNIK [email protected] Opinions expressed by bylined articles are those BOARD OF GOVERNORS 10th District: of the authors and not necessarily those of the 1st District: Adrienne Rines Hammond, Marion ISBA or its members. ©2021 by the Indiana State Bar Association. All rights reserved. Jacquelyn S. Pillar, Crown Point 11th District: Reproduction by any method in whole or in part 2nd District: Jon Laramore, Indianapolis without permission is prohibited. Zachary Lightner, Auburn 11th District: 3rd District: Angka E. Hinshaw, Indianapolis OFFICERS Mag. Cristal Brisco, Mishawaka 11th District: President: 4th District: Charles F. Miller, Indianapolis Michael E. Tolbert, Gary Douglas R. Adelsperger, Fort Wayne At Large District: President Elect: 5th District: Elizabeth A. Bellin, Elkhart Clayton C. Miller, Indianapolis Kyle B. Mandeville, Lafayette At Large District: Vice President: 6th District: Freedom Smith, Indianapolis Amy Noe Dudas, Richmond Nathan “Scott” Smith, Noblesville Past President: Secretary: 7th District: Leslie Craig Henderzahs, Noblesville Renee Ortega, Hammond Emily Storm-Smith, Indianapolis House of Delegates Chair: Treasurer: 8th District: Michael Jasaitis, Crown Point James Dillon, Merriville Laura “Katie” Boren, Evansville House of Delegates Chair Elect: Counsel to the President: 9th District: Hon. Holly M. Harvey, Bloomington Shontrai Irving, Hammond Gregory “Greg” Fifer, Jeffersonville Young Lawyers Section Chair: Sara McClammer, Indianapolis 4 RES GESTAE • ISBA DEPARTMENTS 7 PRESIDENT'S PERSPECTIVE 27 ETHICS 14 STATEWIDE SCOOP 31 RECENT DECISIONS 22 CRIMINAL JUSTICE NOTES 38 CLASSIFIEDS CONTENTS Michael E. Tolbert Doug Church James Bell Partner Partner Attorney Tolbert & Tolbert Church Church Hittle + Antrim Paganelli Law Group CONTRIBUTORS [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Brandon E. Tate Marilyn Smith Stephanie L. Grass Member Vice President & Director of Attorney Waldron Tate Bowen Daugherty Civil Justice Programs Paganelli Law Group Funk Spandau LLC Indiana Bar Foundation [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Shelice R. Tolbert Martha Blood Wentworth Kathy Osborn Partner Judge Partner Tolbert & Tolbert Indiana Tax Court Faegre Drinker [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Heather George Myers Joel Schumm Zena Braish Attorney Clinical Professor of Law Associate Heather L. George Myers, IUPUI Faegre Drinker Attorney at Law [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Steve Hoar Patty Xidas Partner Attorney Kahn, Dees, Donovan & Kahn, LLP Griffith Xidias Law Group LLC Contributors [email protected] [email protected] 5 INBAR.ORGINBAR.ORG • • MARCH 2021 Indiana Work Injury Attorneys Klezmermaudlin.com/referrals/ Klezmermaudlin/referrals.com Klezmermaudlin/referrals.com Cases referred to Klezmer Maudlin will be personally handled by either Randal Klezmer or Nathan Maudlin. We will be thoughtful, responsive Klezmermaudlin.com/referrals/and dependable in our service. INDIANAPOLIS 317.569.9644 EVANSVILLE 812.425.3180 TOLL FREE 800.809.3776 KLEZMERMAUDLIN.COM 6 RES GESTAE • ISBA President's Perspective: The Road less TRAVELED By Michael E. Tolbert PRESIDENT'S PERSPECTIVE obert Frost’s poem, “The Road Out of the debate over what the poem is Not Taken,” has been a hot about, a common theme has emerged: The R topic in literary circles since it power of non-conformity and the benefits was published in 1916. Like any great of going against the grain. This poem poem or stimulating piece of artwork, has been used to inspire many to take an it has been subject to many different unconventional path to better themselves interpretations. Many life lessons can be and the lives of others who may follow in teased out of this literary masterpiece. their footsteps despite the obstacles. Some people refer to Frost’s poem as ‘The Road Less Frost’s poem serves as the Traveled’ because of the perfect backdrop as we final stanza: celebrate the contributions made by blacks and women I shall be telling this with throughout history. February a sigh is “Black History Month,” a time when we celebrate the Somewhere ages and ages great achievements of African hence: Americans and their central role in U.S. history. March is Two roads diverged in a “Women’s History Month” wood, and I— when we commemorate the many contributions women I took the one less traveled by, have made to our great country. Many Hoosiers from these two groups have And that has made all the difference. done remarkable things that impact the practice of law in Indiana. These accomplishments deserve attention. 7 INBAR.ORG • MARCH 2021 TRAILBLAZER ROOTS IN League to fight racial inequities in States. On August 4, 1816, Allen THE HEARTLAND the South Bend area through most was born a free man in Indiana. of the 20th century. Most notable Despite Indiana being a free state, Cornelius Roscoe (C.R.) Richardson was their work to end segregation it still harbored many obstacles for has the distinction of being the first at the Engman Natatorium, which blacks. Allen taught himself how to African American male lawyer in now houses the Civil Rights Heritage read and write and became a school Indiana. Born in 1886 in Athens, Center in South Bend. teacher. He used that vocation as Georgia, C. R. Richardson graduated a gateway to sharpen his reading from Tuskegee Institute in 1905 and and writing skills. Allen would move to Portland, Maine, take the went on to Howard University in "The seeds planted Washington, D.C., earning his law bar exam, and start his practice on degree in 1911. Richardson served in by Allen and others are July 3, 1844. In search of better job the military during World War I and in full bloom throughout opportunities, Allen moved to Boston was instrumental in establishing the and became licensed to practice law American Legion in Indiana. the Indiana State Bar in Massachusetts on
Recommended publications
  • SPRING 2020, Vol. 34, Issue 1 SPRING 2020 1
    SPRING 2020, Vol. 34, Issue 1 SPRING 2020 1 MISSION NAWJ’s mission is to promote the judicial role of protecting the rights of individuals under the rule of law through strong, committed, diverse judicial leadership; fairness and equality in the courts; and ON THE COVER 19 Channeling Sugar equal access to justice. Innovative Efforts to Improve Access to Justice through Global Judicial Leadership 21 Learning Lessons from Midyear Meeting in New Orleans addresses Tough Cases BOARD OF DIRECTORS ongoing challenges facing access to justice. Story on page 14 24 Life After the Bench: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Honorable Sharon Mettler PRESIDENT 2 President's Message Hon. Bernadette D'Souza 26 Trial Advocacy Training for Parish of Orleans Civil District Court, Louisiana 2 Interim Executive Director's Women by Women Message PRESIDENT-ELECT 29 District News Hon. Karen Donohue 3 VP of Publications Message King County Superior Court, Seattle, Washington 51 District Directors & Committees 4 Q&A with Judge Ann Breen-Greco VICE PRESIDENT, DISTRICTS Co-Chair Human Trafficking 52 Sponsors Hon. Elizabeth A. White Committee Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County 54 New Members 5 Independent Immigration Courts VICE PRESIDENT, PUBLICATIONS Hon. Heidi Pasichow 7 Resource Board Profile Superior Court of the District of Columbia Cathy Winter-Palmer SECRETARY Hon. Orlinda Naranjo (ret.) 8 Global Judicial Leadership 419th District Court of Texas, Austin Doing the Impossible: NAWJ work with the Pan-American TREASURER Commission of Judges on Social Hon. Elizabeth K. Lee Rights Superior Court of California, San Mateo County IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT 11 Global Judicial Leadership Hon. Tamila E.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 STUDENT EDITION INCLUDING OUTLINE and DISCUSSION TOPICS John R Berger
    CHANGE OF VENUE CHANGE OF VENUE A LAW STUDIES TEXTBOOK INCLUDING THE TRUE STORY OF AN INDIANA TRIAL FOR TRIPLE MURDER 2014 STUDENT EDITION INCLUDING OUTLINE AND DISCUSSION TOPICS John R Berger 1 CHANGE OF VENUE Copyright 2008 by John R. Berger. [email protected] All rights reserved. This book or parts thereof may not be reproduced in any form without permission of the author. Published 2014 by Lake James Press 20 Lane 200H Lake James Angola IN 46703 NOTE: The page references below may not be correct due to scribd formatting. However, by downloading and selecting DOC, it should download in MS Works, the page references should be correct, and the document can be saved, edited, selected and printed. The entire materials in this textbook are available as a Survey of Law course in MS PowerPoint with narration as a free MOOC (Massive Open Online Course). To access the course go to or click on the following link http://www.coursesites.com/s/_LAW-INTRODUCTION Then click on Content. Then click on Change of Venue PowerPoint. Then click on Browse as a Guest to view and listen to the entire course. THE AUTHOR: John R. Berger is a graduate of Harvard Law School (JD 1953), Hillsdale College (BS Summa Cum Laude 1950), and a retired Circuit Court Judge and Professor of Law, Tri-State University. He is the author of a non fiction novel, The Red Gas Can, based upon the triple murder trial described in Change of Venue, and his autobiography, The Bubbles Rise. These books including Change of Venue are available in paperback at Amazon.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Law Review Evidence
    South Carolina Law Review Volume 31 Issue 1 ANNUAL SURVEY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Article 8 LAW 1979 Evidence Joseph Barry Gellman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Gellman, Joseph Barry (1979) "Evidence," South Carolina Law Review: Vol. 31 : Iss. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sclr/vol31/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you by the Law Reviews and Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in South Carolina Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gellman: Evidence EVIDENCE I. RES GESTAE In State v. Blackburn' the supreme court held that facts stated, but not conclusions drawn, by a hearsay declarant are admissible under the res gestae2 exception to the hearsay rule. The court stated that a hearsay statement that "appears to be the product of consideration and reflection ...cannot qualify as ' '3 part of the res gestae. The case arose from circumstances surrounding the death of Pamela Tanner. Ms. Tanner was assaulted, set on fire in her car, and later died as a result of her injuries. At trial, the state sought to show that appellant's motive in allegedly procuring two men to kill Ms. Tanner was to prevent her from testifying against him on charges of arson, housebreaking and grand larceny. Appellant 1. 271 S.C. 324, 247 S.E.2d 334 (1978). 2. The term "res gestae" is one of many chameleonic legal terms the very use of which is problematic because the term lacks precision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lessons of Regina V. Bedingfield for Modern Confrontation and Domestic Violence Cases
    Fordham Law Review Volume 79 Issue 1 Article 7 November 2011 Sex, Threats, and Absent Victims: The Lessons of Regina v. Bedingfield for Modern Confrontation and Domestic Violence Cases Aviva Orenstein Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Aviva Orenstein, Sex, Threats, and Absent Victims: The Lessons of Regina v. Bedingfield for Modern Confrontation and Domestic Violence Cases, 79 Fordham L. Rev. 115 (2011). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol79/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE SEX, THREATS, AND ABSENT VICTIMS: THE LESSONS OF REGINA V. BEDINGFIELD FOR MODERN CONFRONTATION AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES Aviva Orenstein* In 2004, Crawford v. Washington, authored by Justice Scalia, revolutionized the law of confrontation by requiring that, aside from two discrete exceptions, all testimonial statements (those made with the expectation that they will serve to prosecute the accused) be subject to cross-examination. This new interpretation of the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause has profoundly affected domestic violence cases, making it much harder to prosecute them successfully. Although Justice Scalia’s approach to confrontation is new, it is strikingly similar to the analysis in Regina v. Bedingfield, a notorious English murder case, which excluded from the evidence an alleged statement by the murder victim.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expanding Use of the Res Gestae Doctrine
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 2009 The Expanding Use of the Res Gestae Doctrine H. Patrick Furman University of Colorado Law School Ann England University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Evidence Commons, Legal History Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Citation Information H. Patrick Furman & Ann England, The Expanding Use of the Res Gestae Doctrine, Colo. Law., June 2009, at 35, available at http://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/258/. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 38 Colo. Law. 35 2009 Provided by: William A. Wise Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Sun Mar 19 16:02:30 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information CRIMINAL LAW The Expanding Use of the Res Gestae Doctrine by H.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARACTER EVIDENCE QUICK REFERENCE Reputation – Opinion – Specific Instances of Conduct - Habit
    CHARACTER EVIDENCE QUICK REFERENCE reputation – opinion – specific instances of conduct - habit Character of the Defendant – 404(a)(1) (pages 14-29) (pages 4-8) * Test: Proper Purpose + Relevance + Time * Test: Relevance (to the crime charged) + Similarity + 403 balancing; rule of inclusion + 403 balancing; rule of exclusion * Put basis for ruling in record (including * Defendant gets to go first w/ "good 403 balancing analysis) character" evidence – reputation or opinion only (see rule 405) * D has burden to keep 404(b) evidence out ^ State can cross-examine as to specific instances of bad character * proper purposes: motive, opportunity, knowledge/intent, preparation/m.o., common * Law-abidingness ALWAYS relevant scheme/plan, identity, absence of mistake/ accident/entrapment, res gestae (anything * General good character not relevant but propensity) * Defendant's character is substantive ^ Credibility is never proper – 608(b), not 404(b) evidence of innocence – entitled to instruction if requested * time: remoteness is less significant when used to show intent, motive, m.o., * D's evidence of self-defense does not knowledge, or lack of mistake/accident - automatically put character at issue * remoteness more significant when common scheme or plan (seven year rule) ^ unless continuous course of conduct, or D is gone * similarity: particularized, but not Character of the victim – 404(a)(2) (pages 8-11) necessarily bizarre ^ the more similar acts are, the less problematic time is * Test: Relevance (to the crime charged) + 403 balancing;
    [Show full text]
  • Death of Res Gestae and Other Developments in Missouri Hearsay Law, The
    Missouri Law Review Volume 60 Issue 4 Fall 1995 Article 8 Fall 1995 Death of Res Gestae and Other Developments in Missouri Hearsay Law, The Amanda Bartlett Mook Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Amanda Bartlett Mook, Death of Res Gestae and Other Developments in Missouri Hearsay Law, The, 60 MO. L. REV. (1995) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol60/iss4/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mook: Mook: Death of Res Gestae The Death of Res Gestae and Other Developments in Missouri Hearsay Law Bynote v. National Super Markets, Inc.' I. INTRODUCTION Res gestae is a Latin term that has had many meanings in American courts. Courts have used it when referring to a variety of hearsay exceptions, such as the excited utterance exception, the present sense impression exception, the verbal part of the act doctrine, and statements of mental or physical condition.2 In Bynote v. National Super Markets, Inc., the Missouri Supreme Court determined that the use of the term res gestae should be abandoned in favor of the specific hearsay exceptions it has covered.' The court also held that any requirement of executive capacity to meet the vicarious admission of a party-opponent hearsay exception should be abandoned.4 In addition, the court reviewed Missouri law pertaining to the state of mind and excited utterance hearsay exceptions.' II.
    [Show full text]
  • Rape Shield Laws: Protecting the Victim at the Expense of the Defendant's Constitutional Rights
    NYLS Journal of Human Rights Volume 13 Issue 2 VOLUME XIII WINTER 1997 PART Two Article 7 Winter 1997 RAPE SHIELD LAWS: PROTECTING THE VICTIM AT THE EXPENSE OF THE DEFENDANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS Shawn J. Wallach Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Wallach, Shawn J. (1997) "RAPE SHIELD LAWS: PROTECTING THE VICTIM AT THE EXPENSE OF THE DEFENDANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS," NYLS Journal of Human Rights: Vol. 13 : Iss. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights/vol13/iss2/7 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of Human Rights by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. RAPE SHIELD LAWS: PROTECTING THE VICTIM AT THE EXPENSE OF THE DEFENDANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS I. Introduction Rape is a crime differentfrom any other,' in part because of the elements of the crime,2 but mostly because of the historical treatment of the crime and its victims.' Traditionally, a crime is defined by examining what the defendant did and what the intended consequences of the crime were.' Rape is different from this standard definition because courts have almost always focused on the victim and only Susan Estrich, Rape,, 95 YALE L.J. 1087, 1093 (1986) (stating that there is no "model statute" solution where rape law is involved because the problem is with our interpretationor our understandingof words in the statute such as "consent" and "will" and "force"); see also Sakthi Murthy, Rejecting UnreasonableSexual Expectations: Limits on Using a Rape Victim's Sexual History to Show the Defendant's Mistaken Belief in Consent, 79 CAL.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Indiana Law Review Volume 30 1997 Number 1 ARTICLES Thirty Years of the Journey of Indiana's Women Judges 1964-1994 Honorable Betty Barteau" Table of Contents Table of Contents 43 Introduction 45 I. The Genesis of Women in the Legal Profession in the United States ... 46 A. The State Bar Experience 46 B. The Federal Experience 52 C. Personal Lives 53 II. The Genesis of Women in the Legal Profession in Indiana 55 in. The Genesis of Women in the Judiciary in the United States 62 IV. The Genesis of Women in the Judiciary in Indiana 65 V. The Arduous Climb from Bar to Bench 70 VI. A Profile of Indiana Women Who Have Made the Arduous Climb 75 A. Education 75 B. Family Life 76 C. Income 77 D. Path to the Profession 78 E. The Practice 79 F. Path to the Bench 80 G. Struggles for Fairness as Judges 84 H. Jurisdiction and Work Preferences 87 /. The Trails Blazed 88 VII. Have Women Judges Made a Difference Nationally 88 VIII. Have Women Judges Made a Difference in Indiana 94 IX. Conclusion 96 Addendum 100 Appendix A: Alphabetical Summary of Women Judges 103 Appendix B: Chronological Summary of Women Judges 108 Appendix C: Biographies of Women Judges (Chronological Order) 113 * Judge, Indiana Court of Appeals. J.D., Indiana University School of Law—Indianapolis; L.L.M., 1995, University of Virginia. 44 INDIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 30:43 Appendix D: Map of State of Indiana Showing Distribution of Women Judges 196 Appendix E: Indiana Judges 197 Appendix F: Indiana Doctors 198 Appendix G: Indiana Senators and Representatives 199 Appendix H: Indiana Law Graduates 200 Appendix I: Years of Practice 201 Appendix J: Indiana Women Judges (Age) 202 Appendix C Index Biography of Vivian Sue Shields 113 Biography of Betty Scales Barteau 115 Biography of Linda L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Judicial Year in Review 2019 INDIANA JUDICIAL SERVICE REPORT JUDICIAL YEAR in REVIEW
    Indiana Judicial Service Report HONORED TO SERVE 2019 Judicial Year in Review 2019 INDIANA JUDICIAL SERVICE REPORT JUDICIAL YEAR IN REVIEW The Supreme Court of Indiana The Honorable Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice The Honorable Steven H. David The Honorable Mark S. Massa The Honorable Geoffrey G. Slaughter The Honorable Christopher M. Goff Justin P. Forkner, Chief Administrative Officer Office of Judicial Administration 251 North Illinois St., Ste. 1600 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: (317) 232-2542 courts.in.gov ii | Judicial Year in Review ON THE COVER History of the Sullivan County Courthouse Sullivan County was named for Daniel Sullivan, American Revolutionary War hero and later the leader of the Vincennes area militia. The town of Carlisle was the county seat from 1816-1819. A log building in the town of Merom served as the courthouse from 1819 to 1842. The City of Sullivan became the county seat in 1843. The Sullivan County courthouse has been located in the center of the downtown city square in Sullivan since 1843. The construction of the current courthouse began in 1926 and was completed in 1928. The courthouse was built in the Beau Arts architectural style by architect John Bayard and builder Walter Heath. John Bayard was also the architect of the Vermillion County Courthouse, and the Sullivan County Courthouse and the Vermillion County Courthouse are nearly identical in style. It was the conscious choice of the Sullivan County Commissioners to construct the courthouse in Sullivan based on the design of the Vermillion County Courthouse, which had been completed in 1924. The Sullivan County Courthouse is nearly square, constructed with a steel frame and concrete.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Leadership
    1 Women in Leadership Women in Leadership and Their Influence on Rural Community Development by Christina Pearison Final Project Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Leadership Development Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College August 22, 2020 Women in Leadership 2 Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College Graduate Program in Leadership Development Date: August_22, 2020__ We hereby recommend that the Final Project submitted by: Christina Pearison Entitled: Women in Leadership and Their Influence on Rural Community Development Be accepted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Leadership Development. Advisory Committee: __8/27/2020_ _Jennie Mitchell, Ph.D._________________ date __9/01/2020__ Lamprini Pantazi, Ph.D.______ date We certify that in this Final Project all research involving human subjects complies with the Policies and Procedures for Research involving Human Subjects, Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College, Saint Mary-of-the-Woods, Indiana 47876 Women in Leadership 3 Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 5 The Mission ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 The Vision .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rape Shield Laws: Protecting the Victim at the Expense of the Defendant's Constitutional Rights
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk NYLS Journal of Human Rights Volume 13 Issue 2 VOLUME XIII WINTER 1997 PART Two Article 7 Winter 1997 RAPE SHIELD LAWS: PROTECTING THE VICTIM AT THE EXPENSE OF THE DEFENDANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS Shawn J. Wallach Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Wallach, Shawn J. (1997) "RAPE SHIELD LAWS: PROTECTING THE VICTIM AT THE EXPENSE OF THE DEFENDANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS," NYLS Journal of Human Rights: Vol. 13 : Iss. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights/vol13/iss2/7 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of Human Rights by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. RAPE SHIELD LAWS: PROTECTING THE VICTIM AT THE EXPENSE OF THE DEFENDANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS I. Introduction Rape is a crime differentfrom any other,' in part because of the elements of the crime,2 but mostly because of the historical treatment of the crime and its victims.' Traditionally, a crime is defined by examining what the defendant did and what the intended consequences of the crime were.' Rape is different from this standard definition because courts have almost always focused on the victim and only Susan Estrich, Rape,, 95 YALE L.J. 1087, 1093 (1986) (stating that there is no "model statute" solution where rape law is involved because the problem is with our interpretationor our understandingof words in the statute such as "consent" and "will" and "force"); see also Sakthi Murthy, Rejecting UnreasonableSexual Expectations: Limits on Using a Rape Victim's Sexual History to Show the Defendant's Mistaken Belief in Consent, 79 CAL.
    [Show full text]