DOCSLIB.ORG

SRVO Ultrasound Veterinary Services Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SRVO Ultrasound Veterinary Services Survey Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q1 When Did you Graduate? Answered: 31 Skipped: 0 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses 1970s 6.45% 2 1980s 12.90% 4 1990s 19.35% 6 2000s 38.71% 12 2010s 22.58% 7 Total 31 1 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q2 What percentage of you time is devoted to Small Ruminant work? Answered: 31 Skipped: 0 0% 1-5% 5-10% 10-25% >25% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses 0% 0.00% 0 1-5% 35.48% 11 5-10% 45.16% 14 10-25% 12.90% 4 >25% 6.45% 2 Total 31 2 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q3 What OSMA district do you primarily work in? Answered: 31 Skipped: 0 1 (Essex, Lambton, Ken... 2 (Grey and Bruce) 3 (Huron, Perth,... 4 (Brant, Haldimond-No... 5 (Dufferin, Wellington,... 6 (Simcoe, Muskoka) 7 (York, Durham,... 8 (Lennox, Addington,... 9 (Renfrew, Lanark, Nort... 10 (Russell, Prescott,... 11 (The North!) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses 1 (Essex, Lambton, Kent, Middlesex) 3.23% 1 2 (Grey and Bruce) 22.58% 7 3 (Huron, Perth, Waterloo, Oxford) 29.03% 9 4 (Brant, Haldimond-Norfolk, Niagra, Wentworth) 3.23% 1 5 (Dufferin, Wellington, Peel, Halton) 16.13% 5 6 (Simcoe, Muskoka) 9.68% 3 7 (York, Durham, Kawartha Lakes, Haliburton, Northumberland) 12.90% 4 8 (Lennox, Addington, Frontenac, Prince Edward, Hastings, Leeds) 6.45% 2 9 (Renfrew, Lanark, North Ottawa) 0.00% 0 3 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey 10 (Russell, Prescott, Glengarry etc. Ottawa) 3.23% 1 11 (The North!) 3.23% 1 Total Respondents: 31 4 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q4 Do you offer Pregnancy Diagnosis in Sheep? Answered: 31 Skipped: 0 Yes No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes 83.87% 26 No 16.13% 5 Total 31 5 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q5 Do you offer Pregnancy Diagnosis in Goats? Answered: 31 Skipped: 0 Yes No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes 80.65% 25 No 19.35% 6 Total 31 6 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q6 What Kind of ultrasound do you use? Answered: 30 Skipped: 1 Portable (battery... Portable curvilinear... Portable sector probe Stationary (plug in)... Stationary curvilinear... Stationary sector probe 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Portable (battery operated) linear probe 70.00% 21 Portable curvilinear probe 13.33% 4 Portable sector probe 6.67% 2 Stationary (plug in) linear probe 3.33% 1 Stationary curvilinear probe 3.33% 1 Stationary sector probe 3.33% 1 Total 30 7 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q7 Does your ultrasound equipment have the ability to easily identify and save images? Answered: 29 Skipped: 2 Yes No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes 44.83% 13 No 55.17% 16 Total 29 8 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q8 Does your clinic currently employ a veterinary technician? Answered: 31 Skipped: 0 Yes - an RVT Yes - a non-register... No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes - an RVT 67.74% 21 Yes - a non-registered technician 9.68% 3 No 22.58% 7 Total 31 9 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q9 Do you offer fetal counting as part of your pregnancy Diagnosis? Answered: 30 Skipped: 1 Yes - I feel I am very... Yes - but I am unsure of my... No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes - I feel I am very accurate 3.33% 1 Yes - but I am unsure of my accuracy 26.67% 8 No 70.00% 21 Total 30 10 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q10 If facilities are not a factor, how many animals could you check in 20 minutes, assuming 80% conception and 40-100 days bred? Answered: 26 Skipped: 5 less than 10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 35-40 40-50 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses less than 10 0.00% 0 10-15 15.38% 4 15-20 15.38% 4 20-25 15.38% 4 25-30 23.08% 6 35-40 11.54% 3 40-50 19.23% 5 Total 26 11 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q11 How do you charge for pregnancy diagnosis? Answered: 26 Skipped: 5 By the head By the hour 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses By the head 11.54% 3 By the hour 88.46% 23 Total 26 12 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q12 Do you think Technicians should be allowed to diagnosis pregnancy via transabdominal ultrasound in small ruminants? Answered: 30 Skipped: 1 Yes, under the direct... Yes, under the indirect... Yes, with no connection t... No, pregnancy diagnosis... 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes, under the direct supervision of a veterinarian (Vet confirms diagnosis with saved images) 13.33% 4 Yes, under the indirect supervision of a veterinarian (Vet must have valid VCPR with client, tech diagnoses without saved images) 43.33% 13 Yes, with no connection to a veterinarian - after a certification process 3.33% 1 No, pregnancy diagnosis should only be performed by a veterinarian performing the task in real time 40.00% 12 Total 30 13 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q13 Would anyone from your practice participate in a training and certification course, if offered Answered: 29 Skipped: 2 Yes, a veterinarian... Yes, a technician No, too busy No, not interested 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes, a veterinarian (or multiple) 68.97% 20 Yes, a technician 13.79% 4 No, too busy 6.90% 2 No, not interested 10.34% 3 Total 29 14 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q14 Would a portable chute assist you to perform pregnancy diagnosis more efficiently? Answered: 28 Skipped: 3 Yes - I would buy one Yes, but I can't justif... No, set ups are good No, I work by the hour and... 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes - I would buy one 7.14% 2 Yes, but I can't justify buying one 42.86% 12 No, set ups are good 21.43% 6 No, I work by the hour and if the client wants efficiency they should provide it 28.57% 8 Total 28 15 / 16 Pregnancy Diagnosis SurveyMonkey Q15 Do you see pregnancy diagnosis as an opportunity for your practice? Answered: 31 Skipped: 0 Yes, if there weren't lay... Yes, in dairy goats Yes, in sheep No, I am not interested No, someone will do it... No, someone will do it... 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes, if there weren't lay technicians available 61.29% 19 Yes, in dairy goats 29.03% 9 Yes, in sheep 6.45% 2 No, I am not interested 0.00% 0 No, someone will do it better 0.00% 0 No, someone will do it cheaper 3.23% 1 Total 31 16 / 16.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Canadian Parliamentary Guide
    NUNC COGNOSCO EX PARTE THOMAS J. BATA LI BRARY TRENT UNIVERSITY us*<•-« m*.•• ■Jt ,.v<4■■ L V ?' V t - ji: '^gj r ", •W* ~ %- A V- v v; _ •S I- - j*. v \jrfK'V' V ■' * ' ’ ' • ’ ,;i- % »v • > ». --■ : * *S~ ' iJM ' ' ~ : .*H V V* ,-l *» %■? BE ! Ji®». ' »- ■ •:?■, M •* ^ a* r • * «'•# ^ fc -: fs , I v ., V', ■ s> f ** - l' %% .- . **» f-•" . ^ t « , -v ' *$W ...*>v■; « '.3* , c - ■ : \, , ?>?>*)■#! ^ - ••• . ". y(.J, ■- : V.r 4i .» ^ -A*.5- m “ * a vv> w* W,3^. | -**■ , • * * v v'*- ■ ■ !\ . •* 4fr > ,S<P As 5 - _A 4M ,' € - ! „■:' V, ' ' ?**■- i.." ft 1 • X- \ A M .-V O' A ■v ; ■ P \k trf* > i iwr ^.. i - "M - . v •?*»-• -£-. , v 4’ >j- . *•. , V j,r i 'V - • v *? ■ •.,, ;<0 / ^ . ■'■ ■ ,;• v ,< */ ■" /1 ■* * *-+ ijf . ^--v- % 'v-a <&, A * , % -*£, - ^-S*.' J >* •> *' m' . -S' ?v * ... ‘ *•*. * V .■1 *-.«,»'• ■ 1**4. * r- * r J-' ; • * “ »- *' ;> • * arr ■ v * v- > A '* f ' & w, HSi.-V‘ - .'">4-., '4 -' */ ' -',4 - %;. '* JS- •-*. - -4, r ; •'ii - ■.> ¥?<* K V' V ;' v ••: # * r * \'. V-*, >. • s s •*•’ . “ i"*■% * % «. V-- v '*7. : '""•' V v *rs -*• * * 3«f ' <1k% ’fc. s' ^ * ' .W? ,>• ■ V- £ •- .' . $r. « • ,/ ••<*' . ; > -., r;- •■ •',S B. ' F *. ^ , »» v> ' ' •' ' a *' >, f'- \ r ■* * is #* ■ .. n 'K ^ XV 3TVX’ ■■i ■% t'' ■ T-. / .a- ■ '£■ a« .v * tB• f ; a' a :-w;' 1 M! : J • V ^ ’ •' ■ S ii 4 » 4^4•M v vnU :^3£'" ^ v .’'A It/-''-- V. - ;ii. : . - 4 '. ■ ti *%?'% fc ' i * ■ , fc ' THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY GUIDE AND WORK OF GENERAL REFERENCE I9OI FOR CANADA, THE PROVINCES, AND NORTHWEST TERRITORIES (Published with the Patronage of The Parliament of Canada) Containing Election Returns, Eists and Sketches of Members, Cabinets of the U.K., U.S., and Canada, Governments and Eegisla- TURES OF ALL THE PROVINCES, Census Returns, Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Lanark County Community Forest Forest Management Plan 2011-2030
    Lanark County Community Forest Forest Management Plan 2011-2030 Approved By: Lanark County: (Forest Owner) Sharon Mousseau, Warden, Lanark County Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority: (Forest Manager) Paul Lehman General Manager Date: Copy #: Page 1 of 109 LANARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOREST FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Preparation This plan has been prepared for Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority as part of a five year Memorandum of Understanding for forest management services with Lanark County by: Upper Canada Forestry Service, Martin Streit R.P.F. The forest resource inventory maps were prepared by: Dorothy Hamilton, R.P.F. This plan, after Public consultation, has been reviewed by the Community Forest Working Group and is recommended to the Community Development Committee for consideration: Jonathan Allen. Facilities and Fleet Manager, County of Lanark Susan Freeman, Deputy Reeve, Tay Valley Peter McLaren, Mayor, Lanark Highlands Cliff Bennett, Member of the Mississippi and Rideau Valley Field Naturalists Andrew Kerr-Wilson, Private, Lanark Stewardship Council Todd Thompson, Forest Industry Brian Anderson, Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority, Forest Manager Linda Touzin, District Forester, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Jeff Ward, Stewardship Coordinator, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Page 2 of 109 LANARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOREST FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Commonly Used Terms and Acronyms County of Lanark Lanark or County Eastern Ontario Model Forest EOMF Environmental Management System EMS Forest Resource Inventory
    [Show full text]
  • Moodie Family of North Burgess Township – Lanark County, Ontario
    Moodie Family of North Burgess Township – Lanark County, Ontario Henry Houze married two Moodie girls who were cousins. His first wife, Elizabeth, was the daughter of Andrew and Elizabeth Farnell. The 1851 Census shows Andrew married to Elizabeth with 8 children, the oldest child shown being born in 1829. Elizabeth, 17 at the time, is shown in the 1851 census as working seven farms from home for George Palmer, a farmer on Concession 9 Lot 9. Henry’s second wife, Isabella F. Moodie, was the daughter of John Moodie and Jeanette Anderson. Isabella is shown below as being 11 years of age in 1851 making her birth year 1840 but later census data indicates that she was born in 1847. Church records show it was 1845 but at least the 1911 census and the the church records agree that it was September 27th. The 1851 Census of Ontario finds five Moodie families living close to each other in North Burgess, as follows; Concession 10 Lot 7 Thomas Moodie Carpenter Scotland Presb. 28 Jane Scotland Presb. 27 Thomas Upper Can Presb. 8 Hugh Upper Can Presb. 7 James Upper Can Presb. 4 William Upper Can Presb. 2 Jane Upper Can Presb. 1 Notes: Thomas and Jane Condie were married in 1843. Thomas was born in 1813 should probably show as 38 years of age. Concession 10 Lot W3 Andrew Moodie Farmer Scotland Presb. 42 Elizabeth Upper Can Presb. 41 Sally Upper Can Presb. 22 Mary Ann Upper Can Presb. 14 Thomas Upper Can Presb. 12 Joseph Upper Can Presb. 10 Margaret Upper Can Presb.
    [Show full text]
  • Ccpn-Atlas.Pdf
    Writing & Development Team Andreas Wielgosz, MSc, MD, PhD, Chair, Monitoring, Surveillance & Evaluation Expert Panel, Champlain Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Network Jim Jaffey MSc, Epidemiology Consultant Kathryn Williams, Research Biostatistician, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute Sophia Papadakis, BSc, MHA, PhD, Program Leader, Champlain Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Network Danielle Simpson, Analyst, Champlain Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Network Laurie Dojeiji, BSc, Coordinator, Champlain Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Network Contributors Bruce Libman, PhD, Epidemiology and Decision Support Consultant, Champlain Local Health Integration Network Correspondence Champlain CVD Prevention Network c/o Heart Health Education Centre, H-2353 University of Ottawa Heart Institute 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4W7 www.ccpnetwork.ca May 2011 2 Champlain Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Network (CCPN) Monitoring, Surveillance & Evaluation Expert Panel Dr. Andreas Wielgosz Chair, CCPN Monitoring, Surveillance & Evaluation Expert Panel Amira Ali Senior Epidemiologist, Surveillance, Emerging Issues, Education & Research Division (SSER), Ottawa Public Health Dr. Rachel Colley Junior Research Chair, Healthy Active Living and Obesity (HALO) Research Group, CHEO John Cunningham Epidemiologist, Leeds, Grenville & Lanark District Health Unit Bruce Libman Epidemiologist and Decision Support Consultant, Champlain Local Health Integration Network Peggy Patterson Coordinator, Program Planning and Evaluation, Renfrew
    [Show full text]
  • Pupil Accommodation Review Final Staff Report 20170213
    The Upper Canada District School Board Building for the Future Pupil Accommodation Review Final Staff Report to the Board of Trustees February 15, 2017 Upper Canada District School Board 225 Central Avenue West Brockville, Ontario K6V 5X1 613-342-0371 / 1-800-267-7131 www.ucdsb.on.ca Building for the Future Pupil Accommodation Review Final Staff Report to Board of Trustees February 15, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ....................................................................................... 1 2. OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 1 3. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 2 4. FEEDBACK THEMES ....................................................................................................... 7 5. MOVING FROM DRAFT TO FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................... 8 6. FORMAT OF FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTED ..................................................... 11 7. FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS AND REVIEW OUTCOMES .................................................. 11 8. IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................................... 14 9. FINANCIAL IMPACT ....................................................................................................... 15 10. CONCLUSION ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Migration to Ontario
    SCOTTISH MIGRATION TO ONTARIO: THE STRENGTH OF CHAINS by Sara Rose An essay submitted to the Department of Economics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada July 2013 copyright © Sara Rose 2013 Acknowledgements I would like to express my deep gratitude to Dr. Frank Lewis for his feedback and dedication as my supervisor. I would also like to thank Shirley McCormick and Rosemary Barbour for the invaluable resources they provided. Finally, I would like to thank my family and Cameron Taylor for their constant support. i Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 2. Literature Review ............................................................................................................. 2 3. The Place of Chain Migration .......................................................................................... 6 3.1 Models of Migration ................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 A Model of Expected Returns ............................................................................. 6 3.1.2 A Life Cycle Model with Capital Constraints ..................................................... 8 3.1.3 A Migrant-Selection Model ............................................................................... 10 3.2 Chain Migration in the Context of Migration Models ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Consultation
    Appendix D: 1 Building for the Future Pupil Accommodation Review Community Consultation D: 1 Accommodation Review Committee Reports ACCOMMODATION REVIEW COMMITTEE CHAIR REPORT: FOR INCLUSION IN THE FINAL STAFF REPORT February 6, 2017 ARC 4: Chair - Superintendent Susan Edwards OVERVIEW 1. Introduction The Upper Canada District School Board (UCDSB) embarked upon a process called the Building for the Future Pupil Accommodation Review which commenced September 29, 2016. As outlined in the UCDSB Terms of Reference (October 7, 2016), Accommodation Review Committees (ARCs) were constituted to provide local information and context to inform the Board’s ultimate decision on school/pupil consolidation. The purpose and role of the ARCs are in accordance with UCDSB School Closure Policy 413 and the Ministry of Education’s Pupil Accommodation Review Guideline (2015). Further, ARCs serve as the official conduit of information that is shared between the school board and school communities in response to the draft recommendations contained in the draft Initial Staff Report for the Building for the Future Pupil Accommodation Review. The mandate of the ARCs is to provide comment on the draft Initial Staff Report and to collect and summarize feedback and alternate options received through their work, for inclusion with the Final Staff Report. Page 1 of 14 2. Overview of Process 3. Committee Membership PARENT/GUARDIAN FEEDER PRINCIPAL REPRESENTATIVES FOS SCHOOL MEMBERS GROUP 1ST ALTERNATE(s) 1ST ALTERNATE(s) Eric Hardie Mike Kennedy Almonte Lanark N Pakenham P.S. Jennifer Downey Carol Downey Carmela Ciocio Sharon Halladay R. Tait McKenzie Almonte Lanark N Carl Meldrum Chad Ziai “ “ P.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 644 the Following Are the Lists of the Members of the Several Provincial
    644 STATISTICAL YEAR-BOOK The following are the lists of the members of the several Provincial Legislatures :— PROVINCE OF ONTARIO. LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 1902. SPEAKER—HON. F. E. A. EVANTUREL. CLERK—CHAS. CLARKE. Constituencies. Representatives. Constituencies. Repr esentatives. Addington Reid, James Middlesex, North Taylor, W. H. Algoma, East.... Farwell, C. F. Middlesex, West. Ross, Hon. Geo. W. Algoma, West... Conmee, James Monck Harcourt, Hon. R. Brant, North Burt, Daniel Muskoka Bridgland, Dr. S. Brant, South Preston, Thomas H. Nipissing Loughrin, John Brockville Graham, Geo. P. Norfolk, North... Carpenter, E. C. Bruce, Centre.... Malcolm, Andrew. Norfolk, South... Charlton, W. A. Bruce, North. ... Bowman, Chas. M. Northumb'l'nd,E. Douglas, J. H. Bruce, South Truax, R. A. NorthumbTnd, W Clarke, Samuel Cardwell Little, E. A. Ontario, North .. Hoyle, W. H. Carleton Kidd, G. N. Ontario, South... Dryden, Hon. J. Dufferin Barr, John Lrmsden, Alex. Dundas Whitney, J. P. Ottawa \ Powell, C. B. Durham, East.... Fallis, W. A. Oxford, North Pattullo. Andrew Durham, West ... Reid, W. H. Oxford, South.... McKay,'A. Elgin, East Brower, C. A. Parry Sound .... Beatty, W. R. Elgin, West .... Macdiarmid, Finlay G. Peel Smith, J. Essex, North.... McKee. W. J. Perth, North .... Brown, John. Essex, South Auld, John Allan Perth, South Monteith, Nelson Frontenac Gallagher, John S. Peterborough, E. Blezard, T. Glengarry McDonald, D. R. Peterborough, W. Stratton, J. R. Grenville Joynt, R. L. Prescott Evanturel, Hon. F. E. A. Grey, Centre .... Lucas, J. B. Prince Edward. Dempsey, W. R. Grey, North Boyd, G. M. Renfrew, North Munro, John W. Grey. South Jamieson, D. Renfrew, South Latchford, Hon. F.
    [Show full text]
  • Journals of the Legislative Assmbly of the Province of Ontario, 1927, Being the First Session Of
    JOURNALS OF THE Legislative Assembly OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO FROM THE 2ND FEBRUARY TO 5ra APRIL, 1927, BOTH DAYS INCLUSIVE IN THE SEVENTEENTH YEAR OF THE REIGN OF OUR SOVEREIGN LORD KING GEORGE V BEING THE First Session of the Seventeenth Legislature of Ontario SESSION 1927 PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY VOL. LXI PROVINCE OF ONTARIO TORONTO Printed and Published by the Printer to the King's Most Excellent Majesty 1927 INDEX TO THE SIXTY-FIRST VOLUME 17 GEORGE V, 1927 CCOUNTS, PUBLIC: See Public Accounts. ADDRESS : See Lieutenant-Governor. ADJOURNMENT FOR PROROGATION, 211. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING: See East Block. ADOPTION OF CHILDREN, ACT RESPECTING: See Children. ADVISORY BOARD: Highway See under Highway Advisory Board. AGRICULTURE AND COLONIZATION : Committee on, authorized, 10; appointed, 27. Report 178. AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF: Report for 1926, 182. (Sessional Paper No. 21.) Statistical Report, 1926, 183. (Sessional Paper No. 22.) AGRICULTURE INQUIRY COMMITTEE : 1. Question (No. 26), as to total cost to Province, 51. 2. Question (No. 24), as to any action by Government towards closer co- operation with other provinces for Imperial Marketing, 50. 3. Question (No. 28), as to any action by Government towards establishing a co-operative council, 51. AGRICULTURAL WINTER FAIR, THE ROYAL: See Winter Fair. ALLEGIANCE, MEMBERS OATH OF, 2. ALMONTE, TOWN OF: Petition for an Act respecting, 11. Reported, 66. Bill (No. 26) introduced and referred to Ontario Railway and Municipal Board, 72. Reported and referred to Private Bills Committee, 95. Reported, 124. Second reading, 127. House in Committee, 135. Third reading, 139. Royal Assent, 5l6. (17 Geo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glengarry News
    THE GLENGARRY NEWS VOL. XXXIV—No. 47. ALEXANDRIA, ONTARIO, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1926. $2.00 A YEAR. OntBrio Electorate Endorse ALEXANDRIA LACROSSE CLUB District Dairy Meeting Judge Rules Legacy Champions United Counties’ Lacrosse League 1926 Holders of Laplante Cup. Wednesday, December D Gees to United Church Government liqoor Control Policy As will be seen by an advertisement A judgment which may have a con- - in this issue the annual District Dairy siderable bearing on the interpretation - Meeting for the county of Glengarry of wills, where property is left to the Premier Perguson, The Liberal atvd. Progressive will be held at Apple Hill, on Wednes- Presbyterian Chureh in Canada, was day of next week, December 8th. As handed down by Mr. Justice Rose at Leadérs Returned — Glengarry Swings into the meeting is under the auspices iOf Osgoode Hall Saturday. His Lordship Tory Column by Large Majority. the Provincial Department of Agricul- held that a $5^000 legacy bequeathed ture and the Dairymen’s Association to the Presbyterian Church in Canada, of Eastern Ontario, Mr, A. J. Robert- in a wdll dated prior to the union of (Canadian Press) Lambton West—W. S. Harvey. son, Director of the l^istrict, will oc- the two Churches, goes to the United Lanark North—T. A. Thompson. cupy tlie chair. The meeting will open Church, where the testator’s death took Toronto, Ont., Dec. 1.—At half past Lanark South—E. H. Stedraan. at 1.30 in the afternoon and will be place after the Provincial and Domin- eleven this evening the Canadian Press Leeds—F.
    [Show full text]
  • 1871 Census Schedule for Ontario
    1871 Census Schedules Finding Aid Ontario Sub- District Division Missing Microfilm District Name Sub-district Name district Number Number Schedules Number C-9888 1 Essex Malden A 1 9 C-9888 1 Essex Malden A 2 8, 9 C-9888 1 Essex Amherstburg B C-9888 1 Essex Anderdon C C-9888 1 Essex Colchester D 1 C-9888 1 Essex Colchester D 2 9 C-9888 1 Essex Gosfield E 1 9 C-9888 1 Essex Gosfield E 2 9 C-9889 1 Essex Mersea F 1 9 C-9889 1 Essex Mersea F 2 9 C-9889 1 Essex Pelée G 9 C-9889 1 Essex Sandwich West H 9 C-9889 1 Essex Sandwich I 9 C-9889 1 Essex Sandwich East J 1 9 C-9889 1 Essex Sandwich East J 2 9 C-9890 1 Essex Windsor K 1 9 C-9890 1 Essex Windsor K 2 C-9890 1 Essex Maidstone L 9 C-9890 1 Essex Rochester M 9 C-9890 1 Essex Tilbury West N 1 9 C-9890 1 Essex Tilbury West N 2 9 C-9890 2 Kent Romney A 9 C-9890 2 Kent Tilbury East B 1 9 C-9890 2 Kent Tilbury East B 2 9 C-9891 2 Kent Raleigh C 1 9 C-9891 2 Kent Raleigh C 2 9 C-9891 2 Kent Raleigh C 3 6,9 C-9891 2 Kent Raleigh C 4 9 C-9891 2 Kent Harwich D 1 9 C-9891 2 Kent Harwich D 2 9 C-9891 2 Kent Harwich D 3 9 C-9891 2 Kent Harwich D 4 9 C-9891 2 Kent Harwich D 5 9 C-9892 2 Kent Dover E 1 9 C-9892 2 Kent Dover E 2 C-9892 2 Kent Chatham F 1 9 C-9892 2 Kent Chatham F 2 9 C-9892 2 Kent Chatham F 3 9 C-9892 2 Kent Chatham (Town) G 1 9 1 of 34 1871 Census Schedules Finding Aid Ontario Sub- District Division Missing Microfilm District Name Sub-district Name district Number Number Schedules Number C-9892 2 Kent Chatham (Town) G 2 C-9893 3 Bothwell Howard A 1 2 C-9893 3 Bothwell Howard A 2 9 C-9893
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Exhibits
    Ontario Stroke Evaluation Report 2012 Prescribing System Solutions to Improve Stroke Outcomes Supplementary Materials Ontario Stroke Evaluation Report 2012 Supplementary Materials Exhibit 1.2s 1 Age- and sex-adjusted rates of emergency department visits for adult stroke or transient ischemic attack patients1 per 1,000 subLHIN population, in Ontario and by sub-Local Health Integration Network, 2003/04 and 2008/09–2010/11 2003/04 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Group/Subgroup Age- and Sex-Adjusted Rate (n) Provincial Rate2 2.0 (18,935) 1.9 (19,461) 1.9 (19,982) 1.9 (19,686) Standardized Rate3 2.0 (18,935) 1.8 (19,461) 1.8 (19,982) 1.7 (19,686) Local Health Integration Network Sub-Local Health Integration Network2 Erie St. Clair Essex 2.4 (724) 2.4 (764) 2.5 (810) 2.3 (759) Erie St. Clair Chatham-Kent 2.7 (259) 2.3 (230) 2.7 (272) 2.6 (268) Erie St. Clair Lambton 2.0 (246) 1.9 (238) 2.1 (272) 1.9 (242) South West Bruce 2.3 (150) 2.2 (143) 2.4 (161) 1.8 (126) South West Grey 2.1 (169) 2.3 (199) 2.3 (203) 2.1 (186) South West Huron 1.5 (93) 2.1 (123) 2.3 (142) 2.2 (132) South West Perth 1.8 (120) 1.7 (116) 1.8 (120) 1.4 (102) South West Middlesex 1.3 (447) 1.6 (590) 1.9 (697) 1.8 (669) South West Oxford-Norfolk 2.0 (207) 2.0 (210) 2.2 (231) 2.1 (230) South West Elgin 2.1 (141) 2.3 (163) 2.1 (148) 2.2 (160) Waterloo Wellington Urban Waterloo & Rural Waterloo South 2.1 (596) 2.0(622) 2.1 (670) 2.1 (680) Waterloo Wellington Urban Guelph 1.5 (133) 1.7 (168) 1.7 (168) 1.7 (172) Waterloo Wellington Rural Waterloo 1.4 (49) 1.3 (52) 1.6 (63) 1.7 (68) Waterloo
    [Show full text]