DOCSLIB.ORG

CENELEC Project Report Smart House Roadmap

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CENELEC Project Report Smart House Roadmap draft CENELEC Project Report Smart House Roadmap Date 15 October 2010 Author(s) Frank den Hartog, Tom Suters, John Parsons, Josef Faller Version Draft 1.0 for Open Enquiry This CENELEC project report has been drafted by a project team and steering group of representatives of interested parties and is to be endorsed on 2010-11-23. Neither the national members of CENELEC nor the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre can be held accountable for the draft technical content of this CENELEC project report or possible conflicts with standards or legislation. This CENELEC project report can in no way be held as being an official standard developed by CENELEC and its members. This CENELEC project report is publicly available as a reference document from the CENELEC members. CENELEC members are the national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom. CENELEC European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization Comité Européen de Normalisation Electrotechnique Europäisches Komitee für Elektrotechnische Normung CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, 1000 Brussels © 2010 CENELEC - All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CENELEC members. 2 1 Contents List of2 Figures and Tables ..............................................................................................................5 draftForword3 6 Grant4 Agreement, Steering Group and Project Team.................................................................7 1. 5 Introduction....................................................................................................................8 1.1 6 Motivation........................................................................................................................8 1.2 7 Purpose, scope and objective ...........................................................................................8 1.3 8 Document structure ..........................................................................................................9 2 9 Analysis .........................................................................................................................11 2.1 10 Technical, commercial, and deployment requirements for the SmartHouse..................11 2.2 11 Convergence and interoperability ..................................................................................12 2.3 12 Problem Space: Application Domains, Ecosystems.......................................................15 2.4 13 Challenge .......................................................................................................................18 2.5 14 Project vision summary: overview of observations and assumptions ............................19 3 15 Approach.......................................................................................................................22 3.1 16 Starting point of the project approach: convergence and migration...............................22 3.2 17 Project approach: overview............................................................................................22 3.3 18 Stakeholder Requirements: Use Cases...........................................................................23 3.4 19 Selection and analysis of a representative set of Ecosystem standards..........................24 3.5 20 SHR Reference Model (SHR-RM).................................................................................25 3.6 21 Interoperability considerations.......................................................................................28 4 22 Results ...........................................................................................................................30 4.1 23 Use cases........................................................................................................................30 4.2 24 Ecosystems.....................................................................................................................30 4.3 25 Taxonomy ......................................................................................................................31 4.4 26 Interoperability Profiles..................................................................................................35 4.5 27 Solution Space................................................................................................................39 5 28 Summary and conclusions...........................................................................................43 6 29 Recommendations ........................................................................................................45 6.1 30 Application Layer...........................................................................................................45 6.2 31 Communication layers ...................................................................................................46 6.3 32 Home Infrastructure .......................................................................................................46 6.4 33 Compliance ....................................................................................................................46 References34 ......................................................................................................................................48 A 35 Use Cases.......................................................................................................................49 A.1 36 Template.........................................................................................................................49 A.2 37 Intra-Ecosystem use cases..............................................................................................51 A.3 38 Inter-Ecosystem convergence use cases.........................................................................62 A.4 39 Use cases for changing service providers.......................................................................72 3 B 1 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................82 C 2 Long list of Smart House standards ...........................................................................96 draftD 3 Current initiatives ......................................................................................................109 D.1 4 Coordinating bodies .....................................................................................................109 D.2 5 Relevant European R&D projects................................................................................110 6 4 1 List of Figures and Tables 2 Figure 1 Convergence towards smart houses. draft3 Figure 2 An example of increased managerial hassle due to a proliferation of devices 4 in the home. 5 Figure 3 Flowchart of the SmartHouse Roadmap approach 6 Figure 4 Reference model as used in ISO/IEC TR 29107 7 Figure 5 SmartHouse Roadmap Reference Model 8 Figure 6 Service composition in SOA. The Service Consumer accesses a service, 9 which under the hood is composed out of several generic Service Building 10 Blocks (SBBs). Some SBBs may at the same time be used for other services. 11 Figure 7 generic object model of an Ecosystem 12 Figure 8 integrating multiple Ecosystems 13 Figure 9 integrating multiple Ecosystems 14 15 Table 1 The interoperability levels as identified in CWA IFRS [4]. The CWA defines 16 conformity requirements only for levels 4-6 17 Table 2 Long-list of Ecosystems for the SmartHouse. 18 Table 3 Short-list of Ecosystems, following from the use cases 19 Table 4 Interoperability Profile for the SmartHouse Roadmap use case C-3 20 Table 5 Interoperability Profile for the SmartHouse Roadmap use case A-1 21 Table 6 Interoperability Profile for the SmartHouse Roadmap use case A-2 22 Table 7 Interoperability Profile for the SmartHouse Roadmap use case B-1 23 Table 8 object modelling paradigms 24 Table 9 Who is interested in Interoperability? 25 26 27 5 1 Forword 2 This report to EC/EFTA reflects the end results of the CENELEC Project SmartHouse draft3 Roadmap project. It has been prepared by the CENELEC Project Smart House 4 Roadmap Project Team. A previous version has been reviewed by the project’s Steering 5 Committee and was discussed in 2 plenary project meetings. 6 7 The secretariat of the Project is held by NEC. 6 1 Grant Agreement, Steering Group and Project Team 2 The ‘Production of a Roadmap for an integrated set of standards of SmartHouse and draft3 systems relating to it and an Open Event’ is funded under Grant Agreement 4 SA/CLC/ENTR/000/2008-20 between CENELEC and the European Commission. The 5 official starting date of the Grant Agreement has been January 1st, 2009. A call for 6 experts regarding the establishment of the CENELEC Project SmartHouse Roadmap 7 (SHR) Steering Group (SG) and Project Team (PT) was launched on April 28th, 2009. 8 The Kick-Off meeting took place on 19th May 2009, and was attended by 26 9 participants. 10 11 Members of the SHR-SG: 12 • Philippe Carpentier, Schneider Electric 13 • Joost Demarest, KNX 14 • Beatriz Novel, AFME 15 • Mark Ossel, Echelon 16 • Jean-Luc Detrez – Intel 17 • Boudijn Uythof – Domotica Platform Nederland 18 • Paolo Falcioni –CECED 19 • Alan Knight-Scott, EDF 20 • Walter von Pattay, ZVEI 21 • Fred te Riet, ExperTel 22 • Alain Lambert, LEGRAND
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UC Berkeley Energy Use in Buildings Enabling Technologies
    UC Berkeley Energy Use in Buildings Enabling Technologies Title Control and Communications Integration Project Mappings Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/58h8s815 Authors Gunther, Erich W. King, Jack Publication Date 2004 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS INTEGRATION PROJECT MAPPING DRAFT EPORT R ONSULTANT Prepared For: C California Energy Commission Prepared By: EnerNex Corporation 12/3/2004 PUBLICATION # HERE Prepared By: EnerNex Corporation http://www.enernex.com/ Erich W. Gunther, Principal Investigator Jack King, Researcher Knoxville, Tennessee Contract No. C-03-06 Prepared For: California Energy Commission Michael Magaletti Contract Manager Mark Rawson Project Manager Laurie ten Hope Program Team Lead Pier Energy Systems Integration Name, Terry Surles Pier Program Director Robert L. Therkelsen Executive Director DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as the result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees or the State of California. The Energy Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors and subcontractors make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has the California Energy Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Openfog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing
    OpenFog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing Produced by the OpenFog Consortium Architecture Working Group www.OpenFogConsortium.org February 2017 1 OPFRA001.020817 © OpenFog Consortium. All rights reserved. Use of this Document Copyright © 2017 OpenFog Consortium. All rights reserved. Published in the USA. Published February 2017. This is an OpenFog Consortium document and is to be used in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below. The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. The information in this publication was developed under the OpenFog Consortium Intellectual Property Rights policy and is provided as is. OpenFog Consortium makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to the information in this publication, and specifically disclaims implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. This document contains content that is protected by copyright. Copying or distributing the content from this document without permission is prohibited. OpenFog Consortium and the OpenFog Consortium logo are registered trademarks of OpenFog Consortium in the United States and other countries. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Acknowledgements The OpenFog Reference Architecture is the product of the OpenFog Architecture Workgroup, co-chaired by Charles Byers (Cisco) and Robert Swanson (Intel). It represents the collaborative work of the global membership of the OpenFog Consortium. We wish to thank these organizations for contributing
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Communication Technologies for Smart Homes/Building Applications
    Accepted for presentation at the 2015 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT-ASIA). Bangkok, Thailand. November 4-6, 2015. 1 Review of Communication Technologies for Smart Homes/Building Applications M. Kuzlu, Senior Member, IEEE, M. Pipattanasomporn, Senior Member, IEEE, and S. Rahman, Fellow, IEEE 1Virginia Tech – Advanced Research Institute, Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected] frequency. Therefore, communication requirements for CPN Abstract— A customer premises network (CPN) is a critical applications are typically low power consumption, low cost, element to support messaging exchange among smart meters, an simplicity, and secure communications. energy management unit, load controllers, smart appliances and Typical smart grid applications in a CPN, such as HEM, electric vehicles in a smart home/building environment. Smart metering, demand response, etc., are discussed in [3, 4, 5]. In grid applications in a CPN generally are driven by the need for [6], authors propose a comprehensive assessment of various Home/Building Energy Management Systems (HEM/BEM). communication technologies for CPNs and develop an Design of an effective energy management system requires the approach for selecting suitable technologies for demand selection of a proper communication technology. The objective of response applications. A contemporary look at the current state this paper is to compare commonly used wired and wireless of the art in smart grid communications and networking communication technologies for smart grid applications in a premises area network in terms of their standard/protocol, technologies as well as assess their suitability for deployment maximum data rate, coverage range, and adaptation rate. These to serve various smart grid applications are discussed in [7, 8].
    [Show full text]
  • Označením a Třídicím Znakem Uvedeným Níže (Tyto Normy Se Přejímají Pouze Tímto Oznámením Bez Vydání Titulní Strany ČSN Tiskem)
    ÚŘADU PRO TECHNICKOU NORMALIZACI, METROLOGII A STÁTNÍ ZKUŠEBNICTVÍ Číslo 2/99 OBSAH: ČÁST A - OZNÁMENÍ Oddíl 1. České technické normy ČSNI č.10/99 o vydání českých technických norem, jejich změn, oprav a zrušení str. Upozornění redakce str. ČSNI č.11/99 o schválení evropských a mezinárodních norem k přímému používání jako ČSN str. ČSNI č.12/99 o veřejném projednání návrhů norem ETSI str. ČSNI č 13/99 o vydání norem ETSI str. ČSNI č.14/99 o návrzích na zrušení ČSN str. ČSNI č.15/99 o úkolech tvorby norem zařazených do plánu str. ČSNI č. /99 o schválených EN normách a jiných dokumentech (CENELEC) - viz příloha str. ČSNI č. /99 o veřejném projednání norem EN (CENELEC) - viz příloha str. Oddíl 2. Metrologie Oddíl 3. Autorizace ÚNMZ č. 3/99 o zajištění posuzování shody prostředků zdravotnické techniky autorizovanými osobami str. Oddíl 4. Akreditace ČIA č. 2/99 o vydání osvědčení o akreditaci a o ukončení platnosti osvědčení o akreditaci str. Oddíl 5. Notifikace ÚNMZ č.2/99 Informačního střediska WTO o notifikacích Členů Dohody mezi státy ESVO a ČR a smluvních stran str. Oddíl 6. Ostatní oznámení ČÁST B - SDĚLENÍ ČÁST C - PŘEVZATÉ INFORMACE Oznámení ESČ o schválení a vydání Předpisu Elektrotechnického svazu českého podle čl. 4. odst. 6 stanov ESČ str. ČÁST A - OZNÁMENÍ Oddíl 1 – České technické normy OZNÁMENÍ č.10/99 Českého normalizačního institutu o vydání ČSN, jejich změn, oprav a zrušení Český normalizační institut podle § 4 zákona č. 22/1997 Sb., oznamuje, že byly vydány, změněny, opraveny nebo zrušeny dále uvedené ČSN: VYDANÉ ČSN 1.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Working Papers\11156.Wpd
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE RULES OF STANDARD SETTING ORGANIZATIONS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS Benjamin Chiao Josh Lerner Jean Tirole Working Paper 11156 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11156 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2005 Harvard Business School and the National Science Foundation provided financial support. We thank seminar participants at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago/Kellogg “Standards and Public Policy” conference, Melbourne Business School, and the IDEI Conference on the Economics of the Internet and Software Industries for helpful comments, as well as Ken Krechmer, Mark Lemley, and Halla Yang. Research support was provided by Aurora Bryant, Vicky Chang, Seung-ju Paik, Mimi Tam, and Olga Trzebinska. All errors are our own.The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2005 by Benjamin Chiao, Josh Lerner, and Jean Tirole. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: An Empirical Analysis Benjamin Chiao, Josh Lerner, and Jean Tirole NBER Working Paper No. 11156 February 2005 JEL No. L2, O3 ABSTRACT This paper empirically explores the procedures employed by standard-setting organizations. Consistent with Lerner-Tirole (2004), we find (a) a negative relationship between the extent to which an SSO is oriented to technology sponsors and the concession level required of sponsors and (b) a positive correlation between the sponsor-friendliness of the selected SSO and the quality of the standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Grid Standardization Documentation Map
    D2.1 – SMART GRID STANDARDIZATION DOCUMENTATION MAP The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 318782. STARGRID FP7 - 318782 D2.1 – SMART GRID STANDARDIZATION DOCUMENTATION MAP Version V1.3 Status Final Draft Work Package WP2 Preparation Date 2013-11-08 Due Date M8 Submission Date 2013-06-28 Inés Gómez (TECNALIA) J. Emilio Rodríguez (TECNALIA) Main Author(s) Eugenia Aghinii (ASRO) Speranta Stomff (ASRO) Joseba Jimeno (TECNALIA) Christoph Nölle (IWES) Contributors Ibon Arechalde (TECNALIA) Eduardo García (TECNALIA) Eutimio Sánchez (TECNALIA) Dissemination Level PU Nature R Keywords Smart Grid, Standardization, Industry Initiatives D2.1 – Smart Grid standardization documentation map VERSION HISTORY Version Date Author(s) Comments Inés Gómez (TECNALIA) J. Emilio Rodríguez (TECNALIA) Eugenia Aghinii (ASRO) v0.1 2013-06-25 First draft Speranta Stomff (ASRO) Joseba Jimeno (TECNALIA) Christoph Nölle (IWES) Inés Gómez (TECNALIA) J. Emilio Rodríguez (TECNALIA) Eugenia Aghinii (ASRO) V0.2 2013-06-27 Final draft Speranta Stomff (ASRO) Joseba Jimeno (TECNALIA) Christoph Nölle (IWES) Inés Gómez (TECNALIA) J. Emilio Rodríguez (TECNALIA) Eugenia Aghinii (ASRO) v1.0 2013-06-28 Final version, submitted Speranta Stomff (ASRO) Joseba Jimeno (TECNALIA) Christoph Nölle (IWES) Inés Gómez (TECNALIA) J. Emilio Rodríguez (TECNALIA) Eugenia Aghinii (ASRO) V1.2 2013-07-16 Periodic review Speranta Stomff (ASRO) Joseba Jimeno (TECNALIA) Christoph Nölle (IWES) Inés Gómez (TECNALIA) J. Emilio Rodríguez (TECNALIA) Eugenia Aghinii (ASRO) V1.3 2013-11-08 Periodic review Speranta Stomff (ASRO) Joseba Jimeno (TECNALIA) Christoph Nölle (IWES) 2013-11-08 v1.3 2/312 D2.1 – Smart Grid standardization documentation map TABLE OF CONTENTS Version History................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Americas Smart Homes Market – by Products, Services & Geography
    MarketsandMarkets http://www.marketresearch.com/MarketsandMarkets-v3719/ Publisher Sample Phone: 800.298.5699 (US) or +1.240.747.3093 or +1.240.747.3093 (Int'l) Hours: Monday - Thursday: 5:30am - 6:30pm EST Fridays: 5:30am - 5:30pm EST Email: [email protected] MarketResearch.com AMERICAS SMART HOME MARKET By Products (Security, Access, Lighting, Entertainment, Energy Management, HVAC, and Ballast & Battery Pack), Services (Installation & Repair, Renovation & Customization) & Geography Analysis & Forecasts (2013 – 2020) MarketsandMarkets [email protected] www.marketsandmarkets.com Americas Smart Homes Market – By Products, Services & Geography - Analysis & Forecast (2013 – 2020) MarketsandMarkets is a global market research and consulting company based in the U.S. We publish strategically analyzed market research reports and serve as a business intelligence partner to Fortune 500 companies across the world. MarketsandMarkets also provides multi-client reports, company profiles, databases, and custom research services. MarketsandMarkets covers thirteen industry verticals, including advanced materials, automotive and transportation, banking and financial services, biotechnology, chemicals, consumer goods, energy and power, food and beverages, industrial automation, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, semiconductor and electronics, and telecommunications and IT. Copyright © 2013 MarketsandMarkets All Rights Reserved. This document contains highly confidential information and is the sole property of MarketsandMarkets. No part of it may be circulated, copied, quoted, or otherwise reproduced without the approval of MarketsandMarkets. MarketsandMarkets Sample Pages | 1 Americas Smart Homes Market – By Products, Services & Geography - Analysis & Forecast (2013 – 2020) 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 KEY TAKE-AWAY • Americas Smart Homes Market by products, services, and geography market statistics with detailed classifications and splits by revenue. • Analysis of the Americas Smart Homes market by products with a special focus on high growth areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-09 (Adobe Reader)
    Turinys AKTUALIJOS SUDAROMA LAIKINOJI DARBO GRUPË „TEISMO MEDICINOS PROCESAI“ .... 5 STANDARTIZACIJA INFORMACIJA APIE VIEÐAJAI APKLAUSAI TEIKIAMUS EUROPOS IR LIETUVOS STANDARTØ BEI KITØ LEIDINIØ PROJEKTUS ................................. 6 IÐLEISTI LIETUVOS STANDARTAI IR KITI LEIDINIAI ........................................... 6 NETEKÆ GALIOS LIETUVOS STANDARTAI IR KITI LEIDINIAI ............................ 11 TARPTAUTINIØ IR EUROPOS ÁSTAIGØ BEI ORGANIZACIJØ STANDARTAI IR KITI LEIDINIAI, KURIUOS DEPARTAMENTAS GAVO RUGPJÛÈIO MËNESÁ ............................................................................ 13 TARPTAUTINËS STANDARTIZACIJOS ORGANIZACIJOS STANDARTAI IR KITI LEIDINIAI ............... 13 TARPTAUTINËS ELEKTROTECHNIKOS KOMISIJOS STANDARTAI IR KITI LEIDINIAI ................... 16 RATIFIKUOTI EUROPOS STANDARTIZACIJOS KOMITETO STANDARTAI IR KITI LEIDINIAI ............ 17 RATIFIKUOTI EUROPOS ELEKTROTECHNIKOS STANDARTIZACIJOS KOMITETO STANDARTAI ...................................................................................... 19 RATIFIKUOTI EUROPOS TELEKOMUNIKACIJØ STANDARTØ INSTITUTO STANDARTAI IR KITI LEIDINIAI ............................................................................................... 21 REDAKCINË KOLEGIJA R. Rukðënienë (pirmininkë), L. Balèiauskienë, S. Vaitkevièienë, V. Masalskytë, V. Tamoðevièienë Redaktorë V. Tamoðevièienë Maketuotoja A. Skomskienë 2013-09-09 © Lietuvos standartizacijos departamentas, 2013 Lietuvos standartizacijos departamento BIULETENIS 2013 Nr. 9 VILNIUS, 2013 Lietuvos standartizacijos
    [Show full text]
  • Core System Architecture Viewpoints
    Core System System Architecture Document (SAD) www.its.dot.gov/index.htm Draft — September 6, 2011 Produced by Lockheed Martin ITS Joint Program Office Research and Innovative Technology Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Informa- tion Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD MM YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 06 09 2011 (Draft Specification) Month YYYY – Month YYYY 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Core System: System Architecture Document (SAD) Draft GS-23F-0150S 5b. GRANT NUMBER Xxxx 6. AUTHOR(S) 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER Core System Engineering Team Xxxx 5d.
    [Show full text]
  • Authors:M. Emmendorfer, S. Shupe, D. Cummings, T. Cloonancontributors:Z. Maricevic, M. Schemmann, B. Dawson, V. Mutalik, J.Howe, A
    NEXT GENERATION - CABLE ACCESS NETWORK AN EXAMINATION OF THE DRIVERS, NETWORK OPTIONS, AND MIGRATION STRATEGIES FOR THE ALL-IP NEXT GENERATION – CABLE ACCESS NETWORK Authors:M. Emmendorfer, S. Shupe, D. Cummings, T. CloonanContributors:Z. Maricevic, M. Schemmann, B. Dawson, V. Mutalik, J.Howe, A. Al-Banna,and F. O'Keeffe ARRIS ABSTRACT to rise at an alarming rate. Cable Operators like the United Kingdom's Virgin The Cable Industry is facing a Mediaannounced in April 2011 an Internet decade of unprecedented change in the areas speed trial of up to 1.5 Gbps downstream of video and high-speed Internet services. and 150 Mbps upstream [1].The cable This change,driven by competition and competitor Verizonis reportedly exploring consumer demand, will transform the cable plans to upgrade its FiOS system to XG- network end-to-end. This paper will focus PON, the 10 Gbps downstream and 2.5 entirely on what we are calling the Next Gbps upstream technology [2]. New Generation Cable Access entrants in the video distribution space are Network,examining the business drivers, capitalizing on the network investments network options, and migrations strategies in made by the telecom industry, forcing the access layer of the data and HFC changes in their video delivery network as network to provide more IP-based capacity well as the high-speed data network. A key to and from the home. The document covers challenge the cable industry will face in the in-depth the core business drivers and the future will be offering PON-like IP-based technical options spanning animmense area capacity in the downstream and the of network disciplines and technologies, upstream to consumers, while leveraging thus we have included a comprehensive their existing coaxial network.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Platforms for Industrial and Residential Gateways (I) Outline
    Communication platforms for industrial and residential gateways (I) Prof. Dr. Ralf E.D. Seepold Departamento de Ingeniería Telemática Universidad Carlos III de Madrid [email protected] Outline Home and industrial Networking z Powerline z Phoneline z Wireless z Others Service platforms Ralf E.D. Seepold 2 1 Home Automation: A definition The automatic operation or control of equipment, a process, or a system without conscious thought. [Fow78] [Fow78] Fowler, F.G. and Fowler. H.W., Oxford Concise Dictionary, 6th ed, Clarendon Press, Oxford,1978. Ralf E.D. Seepold 3 Smart Home: A definition Home or building [Red01] Usually a new one Equipped with structured wiring Enable remote control or programme an array of electronic devices via commands [Red01] Vendela Redriksson, “Smart home or building”, http://whatis.techtarget.com, 2001. Ralf E.D. Seepold 4 2 Application areas Communication Entertainment Security Convenience Information systems Etc. Ralf E.D. Seepold 5 Smart Home: Applications Examples z Phone to arm home security z Control temperature z Switch appliances on/off z Control lightning z Program home theatre/entertainment system z … and many more Ralf E.D. Seepold 6 3 Push for Home Networking Rapid growth in multiple-PC household penetration z PC penetration exceeds 50% in US households z Multi-PC/household growth (U.S.): 15M (1998) to 26M (2003) * Increasing Internet usage z Nearly 90% of PC households will be online by 2001 z Internet usage growth (U.S.): 20% (1997) to 47% (2001) ** Broadband Internet access z Broadband penetration growth (U.S.): less than 1M (1998) to more than 15M (2002) *** z % Penetration of online households (U.S.): increases from 2% (1998) to 26% (2002) *** * - Dataquest, ** - Yankee Group, *** - Forrester Research Ralf E.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress File
    IRISH STANDARDS PUBLISHED BASED ON CEN/CENELEC STANDARDS 1. I.S. ETS 300590:1999 Date published 12 MARCH 1999 European Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2); Mobile-Services Switching Centre – Base Station System ( MSC – BSS) Interface – Layer 3 Specification (GSM 08.08) 2. I.S. ETS 300574:1999 Date published 12 MARCH 1999 European Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2); Multiplexing and Multiple Access on the Radio Path (GSM 05.02) 3. I.S. EN 60192:1999 Date published 22 OCTOBER 1999 Low-pressure sodium vapour lamps (IEC 60192:1973 (EQV) + A1:1979 (EQV) + A2:1988 (EQV) + A3:1992 (EQV)) 4. I.S. EN 60929:1992/A1:1996 Date published 29 JANUARY 1999 A.C. supplied electronic ballasts for tubular fluorescent lamps - Performance requirements (IEC 60929:1990/A1:1994 (EQV)) 5. I.S. EN 60192:1993/A4:1999 Date published 22 OCTOBER 1999 Low-pressure sodium vapour lamps (IEC 60192:1973/A4:1993 (EQV)) 6. I.S. EN 60192:1993/A5:1999 Date published 22 OCTOBER 1999 Low-pressure sodium vapour lamps (IEC 60192:1973/A5:1994 (EQV)) 7. I.S. EN 60051-9:1989/A2:1999 Date published 29 JANUARY 1999 Direct acting indicating analogue electrical-measuring instruments and their accessories -- Part 9: Recommended test methods (IEC 60051-9:1988/A2:1995 (EQV)) 8. I.S. EN 55022:1994/A1:1998 Date published 12 NOVEMBER 1999 Limits and methods of measurement of radio disturbance characteristics of information technology equipment (CISPR 22:1993/A1:1995 (EQV)) 9. I.S. EN 60034-4:1999 Date published 29 JANUARY 1999 Rotating electrical machines -- Part 4: Methods for determining synchronous machine quantities from tests (IEC 60034-4:1985 (MOD)) 10.
    [Show full text]