DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Wednesday Volume 547 4 July 2012 No. 25 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 4 July 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through The National Archives website at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/parliamentary-licence-information.htm Enquiries to The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 899 4 JULY 2012 900 House of Commons Welfare Reform 2. Mr Tom Clarke (Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) Wednesday 4 July 2012 (Lab): What assessment he has made of the effects of welfare reform on Northern Ireland. [114371] The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Mr Owen PRAYERS Paterson): The reforms that we have introduced give us a rare opportunity to transform our welfare system into one that is fair to all, looks after the most vulnerable in [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] society, and above all, always rewards work. Mr Clarke: In view of recent criticisms of the Work Oral Answers to Questions programme and the Prime Minister’s view that housing benefit for the under-25s should be discontinued, can the right hon. Gentleman tell us what the Government’s NORTHERN IRELAND policy is for youngsters? Is it to create jobs or simply to tolerate their exploitation? The Secretary of State was asked— Mr Paterson: I think the right hon. Gentleman Fuel Laundering underestimates the fact that the issue is devolved, and we are working closely with the devolved Minister with 1. Sammy Wilson (East Antrim) (DUP): What responsibility in this area and other Ministers in the discussions his Department has had with HM Treasury Executive on the arrangements which will be debated on loss of revenue as a result of fuel laundering in shortly as the Bill is taken through the Assembly. It is Northern Ireland. [114370] very important that local circumstances are taken into account so that the Bill that emerges from the Assembly The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Mr Owen suits the circumstances in Northern Ireland. Paterson): My Department has regular discussions with HM Treasury on a wide range of issues. Fuel fraud is Mr Philip Hollobone (Kettering) (Con): When does primarily an excise offence and, therefore, an excepted my right hon. Friend expect the Welfare Reform Bill to matter that falls to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, be introduced by the Executive? which works closely with the Department of Justice for Northern Ireland and its counterparts in Ireland. Mr Paterson: I am in regular contact with Nelson Sammy Wilson: Despite the fact that over the past six McCausland, the relevant Minister, and he is optimistic years more than £2 billion has been lost in revenue as a that he will stick to the schedule, which will enable result of criminal activities through fuel laundering, Northern Ireland to come on stream, as planned, with HMRC has taken only 28 cases to court, and there has the Department for Work and Pensions here. been only one custodial sentence, which was suspended. Does the Secretary of State believe that that is an Jim Shannon (Strangford) (DUP): Many people in adequate response from HMRC or the court system in Northern Ireland view changes caused by welfare reform Northern Ireland? with increasing concern. Northern Ireland has had 30 years of a terrorist campaign. That has led to many Mr Paterson: I thank the hon. Gentleman for his people suffering disability, both physical and mental; question and I appreciate his knowledge of this subject, 15,000 people in Northern Ireland are on incapacity as Minister of Finance and Personnel. He makes a very benefit and employment and support allowance, and good point, which I have discussed with David Ford, 180,000 people are on disability living allowance. Can the Minister of Justice. We have agreed that we should the Secretary of State assure us that every step will be work together so that Northern Ireland sentences can taken to ensure that the unique position of Northern be appealed against if considered too lenient. Ireland is taken into account when it comes to the Mr Laurence Robertson (Tewkesbury) (Con): In the benefits system? Select Committee’s recent report, we identified as a major problem the fact that a marker had not been Mr Paterson: Nobody underestimates the terrible developed sufficiently quickly. Has the Secretary of damage the troubles did to people physically and mentally, State had any discussions with HMRC about the but it is worth reflecting on the fact that high rates of development of that marker, which would make fuel DLA are not unique to Northern Ireland; Merthyr fraud and laundering far more difficult? Tydfil has a rate of 13%, which is very similar to that of Belfast. What I think is important is that for the first Mr Paterson: I am grateful to the Chairman of the time each person will be treated as an individual, his Select Committee for his question and congratulate him circumstances will be taken into account and rehabilitation, on a very interesting report, which showed that real re-education and training will be offered. That has not progress had been made—£250 million lost in forgone come about before. revenue down to £70 million, which is a major improvement. He makes a very good point about marking. There is an Ms Margaret Ritchie (South Down) (SDLP): Given HMRC strategy and there is also a memorandum of that many benefit claimants in Northern Ireland have understanding that has been signed with the Irish Revenue their payments paid directly into Ulster bank and, Commissioners. We keep in close touch on this matter. because of the ongoing debacle caused by the IT problems, 901 Oral Answers4 JULY 2012 Oral Answers 902 have therefore been unable to access their only source of Mr Nigel Dodds (Belfast North) (DUP): On that income and their own money, what assurance can the point about Ulster bank and the failure of IT, I have Secretary of State give that he has had robust discussions listened carefully to what the Minister has said, but is it with RBS, his colleagues in the Treasury and the not frankly outrageous and unacceptable that 15 days Department for Work and Pensions, and the Northern after the problem first appeared, individuals, households Ireland Executive, to find a long-term solution to this and businesses still cannot access their money in the agonising problem for many people, which has heaped normal way? Can he outline in more detail what he and on them misery upon misery? his colleagues in the Treasury are doing to provide a little more flexibility for those facing cash-flow problems? Mr Paterson: The hon. Lady is absolutely right to raise the very real problems that people both in and out Mr Swire: I understand that the right hon. Gentleman of work are suffering due to the IT breakdown. I raised and some of this colleagues are meeting Ulster bank the matter with the Chancellor of the Exchequer and and RBS this afternoon to represent the views of their the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and constituents, and rightly so. Let us not underestimate Skills yesterday. Sir Philip Hampton, the chairman of this. There are people in the Northern Ireland Office RBS, was in Northern Ireland on Monday and my right who cannot get money either, so this is something very hon. Friend the Minister of State talked with him close to many of us. He will be aware of the press yesterday and is keeping in close touch. Ultimately, this release that RBS issued this morning. It is fair to point is a problem for RBS to resolve internally, through out in my conversation yesterday with Sir Philip Hampton, Ulster bank, by getting the computer technology right, the chairman of RBS, he told me that they would but the hon. Lady is right to raise the matter. This is “treat our customers properly and fairly” causing horrendous problems not just for benefit claimants, and that the bank will but for those in regular employment. “compensate fully for financial loss”. We shall hold the bank to that undertaking. Banking Reform Mr Dodds: I am grateful to the Minister for that 3. Mark Durkan (Foyle) (SDLP): What discussions answer and for raising the issue of compensation, but he has had with his ministerial colleagues on the likely does he agree that, as well as reimbursing customers for implications for Northern Ireland of banking reform direct costs, Ulster bank and RBS must ensure that and financial service regulation. [114372] where financial damage and loss has occurred, whether to a customer, either an individual or business, or a The Minister of State, Northern Ireland Office (Mr Hugo non-customer who has suffered loss as a result of the Swire): My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State and crisis, compensation in full must be paid in all those I have been in discussion with ministerial colleagues circumstances? I would welcome his support in lobbying about this matter. The action plan announced by my RBS on that point. right hon. Friend the Chancellor on Monday will drive up standards and bring much-needed and long overdue Mr Swire: The right hon. Gentleman will certainly regulation to the sector. have the support of the Secretary of State and myself in ensuring that no one loses out as a result of this IT Mark Durkan: The Minister will recognise that Ulster failure. I was specific on that point to Sir Philip Hampton bank customers are currently experiencing a third-class, and I cannot do more than repeat the words he said to poor standard of care.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lobbying and All Party Groups
    House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Lobbying and All Party Groups Ninth Report of Session 2005–06 HC 1145 House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Lobbying and All Party Groups Ninth Report of Session 2005–06 Report and Appendix, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 23 May 2006 HC 1145 Published on 25 May 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee on Standards and Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt Hon Sir George Young Bt MP (Conservative, North West Hampshire) (Chairman) Rt Hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton & Ripon) Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) Nick Harvey MP (Liberal Democrat, North Devon) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Elfyn Llwyd MP (Plaid Cymru, Meirionnydd Nant Conwy) Mr Chris Mullin MP (Labour, Sunderland South) The Hon Nicholas Soames MP (Conservative, Mid Sussex) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cruise Passengers' Rights & Remedies 2016
    PANEL SIX ADMIRALTY LAW: THE CRUISE PASSENGERS’ RIGHTS & REMEDIES 2016 245 246 ADMIRALTY LAW THE CRUISE PASSENGERS’ RIGHTS & REMEDIES 2016 Submitted By: HON. THOMAS A. DICKERSON Appellate Division, Second Department Brooklyn, NY 247 248 ADMIRALTY LAW THE CRUISE PASSENGERS’ RIGHTS & REMEDIES 2016 By Thomas A. Dickerson1 Introduction Thank you for inviting me to present on the Cruise Passengers’ Rights And Remedies 2016. For the last 40 years I have been writing about the travel consumer’s rights and remedies against airlines, cruise lines, rental car companies, taxis and ride sharing companies, hotels and resorts, tour operators, travel agents, informal travel promoters, and destination ground operators providing tours and excursions. My treatise, Travel Law, now 2,000 pages and first published in 1981, has been revised and updated 65 times, now at the rate of every 6 months. I have written over 400 legal articles and my weekly article on Travel Law is available worldwide on www.eturbonews.com Litigator During this 40 years, I spent 18 years as a consumer advocate specializing in prosecuting individual and class action cases on behalf of injured and victimized 1 Thomas A. Dickerson is an Associate Justice of the Appellate Division, Second Department of the New York State Supreme Court. Justice Dickerson is the author of Travel Law, Law Journal Press, 2016; Class Actions: The Law of 50 States, Law Journal Press, 2016; Article 9 [New York State Class Actions] of Weinstein, Korn & Miller, New York Civil Practice CPLR, Lexis-Nexis (MB), 2016; Consumer Protection Chapter 111 in Commercial Litigation In New York State Courts: Fourth Edition (Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit – Deal Or No Deal? – Reflections from CBS Brexit Breakfast
    Brexit – Deal or No Deal? – Reflections from CBS Brexit Breakfast By Beverley Nielsen, Associate Professor at Institute for Design & Economic Acceleration and Senior Fellow at Centre for Brexit Studies The Centre for Brexit Studies ‘Deal or No-Deal’ Brexit Breakfast, hosted 6th September and chaired by Dr Jacob Salder, Research Fellow at Birmingham City Business School, met to consider the impacts on the West Midlands of recent Brexit events with daily curve balls being thrown up for business, institutions and citizens to contend with. Whilst breakfast discussions were held on 6th September, by Monday 9th September (date of writing) the situation had developed with (yet another) cabinet resignation, as Amber Rudd, former Work & Pensions Secretary, dramatically downed tools over the intervening weekend. Whilst listening to Women’s Hour on BBC Radio 4, 9th September, one contributor coined an apt phrase stating that Brexit has ‘burst through the veneer of our society’. The Economist (September 7th-13th), in reviewing the Unconservative Party’s revolution, transforming the world’s oldest political party into ‘radical populists’, commented on the constitutional havoc being wreaked through the longest prorogation of Parliament since 1945 and the whip being withdrawn from 21 Tory MPs — including two former Chancellors, seven former cabinet members and Churchill’s grandson, Sir Nicholas Soames, — one of the ‘biggest political bloodbaths in history’ as The Telegraph put it. John Harris in The Guardian, (9th September) noted, “many Tories seem entirely relaxed about the breakup of the UK, the ultimate sacrifice in their headless pursuit of our divorce from Brussels”. With over 3m EU citizens living in the UK and over 1m British citizens in Europe, many are still very unclear about their future status; many too have commented on the impact of extremism in ‘fanning the flames of hatred’.
    [Show full text]
  • One Nation Again
    ONE NATION AGAIN ANDREW TYRIE MP THE AUTHOR Andrew Tyrie has been Conservative Member of Parliament for Chichester since May 1997 and was Shadow Paymaster General from 2003 to 2005. He is the author of numerous publications on issues of public policy including Axis of Instability: America, Britain and The New World Order after Iraq (The Foreign Policy Centre and the Bow Group, 2003). The One Nation Group of MPs was founded in 1950. The views expressed in this pamphlet are those of the author and not necessarily of the whole group. One Nation Group, December 2006 Printed by 4 Print, 138 Molesey Avenue, Surrey CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1 One Nation Conservatism 1 2 The History of the Concept 7 3 One Nation Conservatism renewed 15 4 Conclusion 27 Bibliography One Nation members ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of the One Nation Group of Conservative MPs whose entertaining and stimulating conversation at our weekly gatherings have brightened many a Westminster evening, particularly during the long years in which the Party appeared to have succumbed to fractious squabbling and representing minority interests. I would also like to thank The Hon Nicholas Soames MP, David Willetts MP and the Rt Hon Sir George Young MP for their comments on an earlier draft; Roger Gough who put together the lion’s share of historical research for this paper; the helpful team in the House of Commons Library; and my ever patient secretaries, Miranda Dewdney-Herbert and Ann Marsh. Andrew Tyrie December 2006 CHAPTER ONE ONE NATION CONSERVATISM The Tory Party, unless it is a national party, is nothing.1 The central tenet of One Nation Conservatism is that the Party must be a national party rather than merely the representative of sectional interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Costa Concordia Newspaper Article
    Costa Concordia Newspaper Article Boracic Luther synopsised usually. Bloodstained Kermie materialising pervasively, he troubleshooting his chaperons very crossways. Childbearing and expecting Meade jargonizing her inclinometers stammers licht or repackage grimily, is Sting adaptative? Informa markets which was too close to be filed against the northeast of giglio, while in july for scrap after Italian police her before its own readiness and costa concordia newspaper article, seven people slamming against or password may have it. Last Titanic survivor a baby put lead a lifeboat dies at 97 World news. A Ghostly Tour of the Costa Concordia TravelPulse. Prosecutors to it after they were. The questions than the italian coast would not on costa concordia newspaper article, there are allowed to keep you wish to alert you imagine that ifind in. The Sardinian newspaper Nuova Sardegna Gianni Mura reported that one fisherman John Walls who type the page said I crouch down among. 100 Costa Concordia Salvage ideas Pinterest. Friday is another costa concordia newspaper article? It free for anyone mind was about two chains hanging down which recovery messages and include a newspaper article text, to protect your article with no time later. La Repubblica newspaper quoted Mastronardi as saying i would clear. Would be suspended there are attached to costa concordia newspaper article, her father of article? What really happened on the moth when the Costa. Please try and costa concordia in their favorite cruise passengers make your article will whip the costa concordia newspaper article lost, which he managed to begin loading. Had dropped when he lied at costa concordia newspaper article? Costa Concordia Human nutrition found 20 months after wreck CNN.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Nationalist Politics in a Bi-National Consociation: the Case of the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
    1 Non-nationalist politics in a bi-national consociation: the case of the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland David Mitchell Trinity College Dublin at Belfast Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 24:3, 1-12. 2018 Through a case study of the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland, this article examines the contention that consociational power-sharing, in its determination to include dominant and conflicting identity groups, exalts these identities and excludes others including gender, class and other ethnicities and nationalities. The article describes and assesses the Alliance Party’s arguments that the power-sharing arrangements in Northern Ireland are philosophically objectionable, practically ineffective, and politically detrimental to parties which, like Alliance, are designated as ‘others’. The article finds that the party’s critique of consociationalism as implemented in Northern Ireland is overstated and that the party has been able to play a number of pivotal roles in the new politics. Northern Ireland’s Belfast/Good Friday Agreement is one of the most studied consociational settlements.1 The 1998 accord (hereafter ‘the Agreement’) appeared to enable the region’s transition out of decades of political violence and exclusion, making Northern Ireland, for many analysts, “the key confirming case for consociational theory”.2 However, the Agreement has also faced an array of academic, political and civil society detractors, many of whom have focussed on the specific criticism of consociational power-sharing which is the subject of this special section: that in its determination to include the dominant and conflicting national identity groups, consociationalism exalts these identities and excludes others, including gender, class and other ethnicities and nationalities.3 This article examines the ‘exclusion amid inclusion dilemma’ through the case study of the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Votes and Proceedings for 15 Oct 2020
    No. 120 Thursday 15 October 2020 Votes and Proceedings The House met at 9.30 am. 1 Questions to (1) the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2) the right hon. Member representing the Church Commissioners, the right hon. Member representing the House of Commons Commission, the right hon. Member representing the Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body and the hon. Member representing the Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission 2 Business Question (Leader of the House) 3 Statement: COVID-19 update (Secretary Matt Hancock) 4 Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill: Committee of the whole House The House resolved itself into a Committee (Programme Order, 5 October). (In the Committee) Clause 1 (Authorisation of criminal conduct) Amendment 20 proposed.—(Alistair Carmichael.) Question proposed, That the Amendment be made. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. As it was after 4.00 pm, the Chair put the Questions necessary to bring proceedings to a conclusion (Programme Order, 5 October). The following Questions were put forthwith (Standing Order No. 83D). (1) That Amendment 7 be made (Question on an Amendment selected for separate decision by the Chair).—(Conor McGinn.) The Committee divided. Division No. 138 Ayes: 256 (Tellers: Jessica Morden, Gill Furniss) Noes: 317 (Tellers: Maggie Throup, David Duguid) Question accordingly negatived. 2 Votes and Proceedings: 15 October 2020 No. 120 (2) That Amendment 8 be made (Question on an Amendment selected for separate decision by the Chair).—(Conor McGinn.) The Committee divided. Division No. 139 Ayes: 256 (Tellers: Jessica Morden, Gill Furniss) Noes: 316 (Tellers: Maggie Throup, David Duguid) Question accordingly negatived.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety and Shipping Review 2013
    Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty 2013 Safety and Shipping Review 2013 An annual review of trends and developments in shipping losses and safety – January 2013 Shipping Losses World losses in review: by location, type and cause 2012 in Review Trends and developments affecting shipping safety Future challenges to safety Looking ahead, some topics to watch Costa Concordia lies grounded off Isola del Giglio, Italy, in January 2012. (Photo: PA.) Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty Safety and Shipping Review 2013 Summary • Shipping losses continue downward trend • 27% decrease in 2012 on previous 10 year average • Losses centered on South China and South East Asia region • Foundering most common cause of loss • Despite industry initiatives, challenges remain In 2012, two high profile maritime incidents pushed shipping safety into the public eye once more with the loss of the Costa Concordia off Italy in January followed in February by that of the Rabaul Queen ferry, off Papua New Guinea. Both events caused a tragic loss of life. However, while these incidents have dominated public ship safety discussions, statistics reveal that reported total losses in shipping for 2012 continued a long term downward trend, with a total of 106 vessels recorded as losses in the 12 months to 25 November 2012. While this marks an increase from the previous 2010-11 period (91 losses), this figure is down from the 2001-10 average of 146 vessels per year. Due to the concentration of commercial shipping in geographical areas, nearly two out of three of those total losses (58%) occurred in one of four maritime regions: South China, Indo China, Indonesia and the Philippines (with 30 vessels lost, twice as many as any other area); East Mediterranean and the Black Sea; Japan, Korea and North China; and the British Isles, North Sea, English Channel, and the Bay of Biscay.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 596 11 June 2015 No. 15 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 11 June 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1309 11 JUNE 2015 1310 but will she look at the issue of theoretical access, where House of Commons elevators are often left out of order for days, if not weeks, on end, making disabled access only theoretical? Thursday 11 June 2015 Claire Perry: I would be delighted to meet my hon. Friend to discuss that further. The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Jim Shannon (Strangford) (DUP): Across the whole PRAYERS United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, there have obviously been great advances in improving access for those with sensory disablement—sight and [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] hearing problems. As people travel between the four regions, has the Minister had any discussions with the Minister responsible in Northern Ireland to ensure Oral Answers to Questions uniformity in access for those with sensory disablements across the whole United Kingdom? Claire Perry: I have had not had those discussions, TRANSPORT because I have only recently picked up that part of my portfolio, but my predecessor might have done. I shall apprise myself of the facts and, if necessary, would be The Secretary of State was asked— delighted to have that meeting. Disabled People’s Access (Public Transport) Mr James Gray (North Wiltshire) (Con): We all 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Scenarios Report – Grazeley, Twyford/Ruscombe and Barkham
    WOKINGHAM STRATEGIC GROWTH LOCATIONS Growth Scenarios Report - Grazeley, Twyford/Ruscombe and Barkham Square Prepared on behalf of WBC & WBDC By David Lock Associates & Peter Brett Associates June 2018 Wokingham Strategic Framework : Growth Scenarios Report Prepared on behalf of WBC & WBDC : By David Lock Associates & Peter Brett Associates : June 2018 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Summary of key considerations 30 Growth Scenario 1: 15,000 Homes 34 1.0 INTRODUCTION 6 Concept Plan 34 Purpose of the Strategic Framework Access & Movement 36 Commission 6 Infrastructure requirements 37 Relationship to Green Belt and agricultural Growth Scenario 2: 10,000 Homes 40 land quality 6 Concept Plan 40 Study Brief and Scope 7 Access & Movement 42 Role and Structure of this Report 8 Infrastructure requirements 42 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 10 Alternative 10,000 Home Growth Scenario 43 Growth Scenario 3: 5,000 Homes 44 Stage 1 Project Set-up and Baseline Concept Plan 46 Assessments 10 Access & Movement 46 Site Environmental Studies 10 Infrastructure requirements 46 Baseline Viability 10 Stage 2 Generating Growth Scenarios 10 5.0 BARKHAM SQUARE 48 Technical Workshops 10 Background and Analysis 48 Green and Blue 10 Site Environmental Studies: Summary Transport and Environmental Health 11 Findings 48 Community Wellbeing 11 Flooding & Drainage 48 Utilities 12 Transport & Highways 48 Community Workshops 12 Air Quality 48 Next Stages 13 Noise and Vibration 48 3.0 BASELINE VIABILITY 14 Geotechnical 49 Waste 50 Commercial Property Market 14 Agricultural Land 50 Residential
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms
    While Oxfordshire County Council has made every effort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, it does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information contained in this document and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. © Copyright, Oxfordshire County Council, 2012 Copyright in the typographical arrangements rests with Oxfordshire County Council. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for non- commercial research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The title must be acknowledged as copyright and the title of the publication specified. Unless specified, all maps, tables, diagrams and graphs in this report are a product of Oxfordshire County Council. Editorial Acknowledgement - Adrian Saunders, James Llewellyn, Ed Webster & John Disley. ● ● In January 2012, the Council‟s Cabinet approved a version of the draft Oxfordshire Rail Strategy & Delivery Plan for public and stakeholder consultation. The consultation was launched on 6 February and was made available on the Council‟s e- consultation portal, making it possible for responses to be submitted using a questionnaire online or by returning a pre-formatted document in the post. The consultation lasted for six weeks and ended on 16 March 2012. Invitations to take part in the consultation were sent to 650 individuals or organisations that have an interest in the rail network, including district and parish councils, local businesses using the railway as part of the business activity, Oxfordshire Local Enterprise Partnership, interest groups, such as Oxfordshire Unlimited and Railfuture, and council staff involved in planning, strategy, infrastructure and economic growth.
    [Show full text]