A Guide to Medications Inducing Salivary Gland Dysfunction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Guide to Medications Inducing Salivary Gland Dysfunction Drugs R D DOI 10.1007/s40268-016-0153-9 SYSTEMATIC REVIEW A Guide to Medications Inducing Salivary Gland Dysfunction, Xerostomia, and Subjective Sialorrhea: A Systematic Review Sponsored by the World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI 1,2 3 4 5 Andy Wolff • Revan Kumar Joshi • Jo¨rgen Ekstro¨m • Doron Aframian • 6 7 8 Anne Marie Lynge Pedersen • Gordon Proctor • Nagamani Narayana • 9 10 11,12 13 Alessandro Villa • Ying Wai Sia • Ardita Aliko • Richard McGowan • 13 6,14 15 16 Alexander Ross Kerr • Siri Beier Jensen • Arjan Vissink • Colin Dawes Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract chemical substances with a higher level of evidence and 50 Background Medication-induced salivary gland dysfunc- with a moderate level of evidence of causing the above- tion (MISGD), xerostomia (sensation of oral dryness), and mentioned disorders. At the first level of the Anatomical subjective sialorrhea cause significant morbidity and Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system, 9 of 14 impair quality of life. However, no evidence-based lists of anatomical groups were represented, mainly the alimen- the medications that cause these disorders exist. tary, cardiovascular, genitourinary, nervous, and respira- Objective Our objective was to compile a list of medica- tory systems. Management strategies include substitution tions affecting salivary gland function and inducing or discontinuation of medications whenever possible, oral xerostomia or subjective sialorrhea. or systemic therapy with sialogogues, administration of Data Sources Electronic databases were searched for rel- saliva substitutes, and use of electro-stimulating devices. evant articles published until June 2013. Of 3867 screened Limitations While xerostomia was a commonly reported records, 269 had an acceptable degree of relevance, quality outcome, objectively measured salivary flow rate was of methodology, and strength of evidence. We found 56 rarely reported. Moreover, xerostomia was mostly assessed & Andy Wolff 10 McGill University, Faculty of Dentistry, Montreal, QC, [email protected] Canada 11 Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine, Tirana, 1 Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel Albania 2 Saliwell Ltd, 65 Hatamar St, 60917 Harutzim, Israel 12 Broegelmann Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical 3 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, DAPMRV Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Dental College, Bangalore, India 13 New York University, New York, NY, USA 4 Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Neuroscience and 14 Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Aarhus, Denmark Gothenburg, Go¨teborg, Sweden 15 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of 5 The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 6 Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Groningen, The Netherlands Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 16 Department of Oral Biology, University of Manitoba, 7 Mucosal and Salivary Biology Division, Dental Institute, Winnipeg, MB, Canada King’s College London, London, UK 8 Department of Oral Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) College of Dentistry, Lincoln, NE, USA 9 Division of Oral Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Oral Medicine Infection and Immunity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA A. Wolff et al. as an adverse effect rather than the primary outcome of salivary gland dysfunction (MISGD). The possible adverse medication use. This study may not include some medi- effects associated with these disorders, especially SGH, cations that could cause xerostomia when administered in include dental caries, dysgeusia, oral mucosal soreness, and conjunction with others or for which xerostomia as an oral candidiasis. adverse reaction has not been reported in the literature or Current literature guiding clinicians in the prescribing of was not detected in our search. medications while considering the relevant adverse effects Conclusions We compiled a comprehensive list of medi- on salivary glands is very scarce. Most of the available cations with documented effects on salivary gland function literature attempting to list relevant drugs comprises a or symptoms that may assist practitioners in assessing compendium based on manufacturers’ drug profiles, nar- patients who complain of dry mouth while taking medi- rative reviews, and case reports, or original research papers cations. The list may also prove useful in helping practi- not containing a overall list of medications [1–10]. A tioners anticipate adverse effects and consider alternative systematic evidence-based list that identifies and lists medications. medications that could objectively be associated with MISGD, xerostomia, or subjective sialorrhea is lacking. Hence, the MISGD group of the World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI (WWOM VI) aimed to review the current Key Points knowledge on this subject and compile a list of medications and their objective effects on salivary gland function, based We compiled a comprehensive list of medications on a high level of evidence and relevance. with documented effects on salivary gland function or symptoms that may assist practitioners assessing patients who complain of dry mouth while taking 2 Materials and Methods medications. The list may also prove useful in helping The MISGD group comprised five reviewers (AA, RJ, NN, practitioners anticipate oral adverse effects and YS, and AlV), six consultants (senior experts in fields consider alternative medications. related to MISGD: DA, CD, JE, AMP, GP, and ArV), one research librarian (RM), one group head (AW), and two supervisors on behalf of the WWOM VI Steering Com- mittee (SBJ and ARK). This review addresses one of the 1 Introduction MISGD topics covered by the group, an updated classifi- cation of medications reported to cause objective SGD. The Increased life expectancy, aging populations, and the research method was based on the policies and standards association of these with polypharmacy have been set forth by a task force for WWOM IV [11] and by the intriguing topics over the last few decades. The World PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Health Statistics of 2014 published on the World Health Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement [12], which was Organization website reports a life expectancy of 55–87 adapted to the current review. years in its various constituent countries, with even the lower economy countries reporting rapid increases in life 2.1 Step 1: Scope Definition expectancy. However, with increased age comes a greater number of ailments, which in turn is indicative of a higher The current review covered seven research questions, as intake of medications. follows: Medications for the treatment of various diseases may Which medications have been reported to induce: also cause adverse effects, including those related to the 1. SGD in humans? oral cavity by their effects on the salivary glands. Apart 2. SGD in animals? from medications used to treat salivary gland disorders, 3. xerostomia but not SGD? other medications can also have the following adverse 4. drooling but not SGD? effects: salivary gland dysfunction (SGD), including sali- 5. xerostomia-related oral symptoms (but not SGD) other vary gland hypofunction (SGH) (an objectively measured than excessive dryness/wetness? decrease in salivation) or objective sialorrhea (an excessive 6. xerostomia but have not been tested yet for induction secretion of saliva), xerostomia (subjective feeling of dry of SGD? mouth), or subjective sialorrhea (feeling of having too 7. drooling but have not been tested yet for induction of much saliva). Medication-induced SGH and objective SGD? sialorrhea are collectively termed medication-induced Guide to Medications Inducing Salivary Gland Dysfunction, Xerostomia and Subjective Sialorrhea 2.2 Step 2: Search Term Selection their reviews. Papers were then divided among the reviewers, who analyzed publication titles, abstracts, and The following keywords and subject headings were selec- the materials and methods sections for key parameters. ted for each research question: 2.6 Medication General Inclusion and Exclusion Q1. Medication/drugs/humans AND salivary gland dys- Criteria function, xerostomia, dry mouth, reduced salivary flow rate, hyposalivation, sialorrhea, drooling. 1. Particular drugs for which MISGD has been reported Q2. Medication/drugs/animals AND salivary gland dys- were included. function, reduced salivary flow rate, hyposalivation, 2. A group of drugs or a combination of two or more drugs drooling. without specifying the individual MISGD of each drug Q3. Medication/drugs AND xerostomia, dry mouth, under the group or combination were excluded. hyposalivation AND NOT salivary dysfunction. 3. Drugs reported to induce SGD or used in therapeutic Q4. Medication/drugs AND drooling/sialorrhea/hyper- aspects of SGD were excluded. Thus, parasympath- salivation/ptyalism/increased salivary flow rate omimetics (e.g., pilocarpine and cevimeline) and the AND NOT salivary dysfunction. anti-cholinesterases (e.g., physostigmine and neostig- Q5. Medication/drugs AND salivary glands/saliva/xeros- mine), which are used for stimulation of salivary flow in tomia/dry mouth/hyposalivation AND NOT salivary patients experiencing a dry mouth, were not included. gland dysfunction, oral sensory complaints. 4. Research drugs that were not yet
Recommended publications
  • Drug Development for the Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives
    REVIEW ARTICLE published: 01 February 2013 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00007 Drug development for the irritable bowel syndrome: current challenges and future perspectives Fabrizio De Ponti* Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy Edited by: Medications are frequently used for the treatment of patients with the irritable bowel syn- Angelo A. Izzo, University of Naples drome (IBS), although their actual benefit is often debated. In fact, the recent progress in Federico II, Italy our understanding of the pathophysiology of IBS, accompanied by a large number of preclin- Reviewed by: Elisabetta Barocelli, University of ical and clinical studies of new drugs, has not been matched by a significant improvement Parma, Italy of the armamentarium of medications available to treat IBS. The aim of this review is to Raffaele Capasso, University of outline the current challenges in drug development for IBS, taking advantage of what we Naples Federico II, Italy have learnt through the Rome process (Rome I, Rome II, and Rome III). The key questions *Correspondence: that will be addressed are: (a) do we still believe in the “magic bullet,” i.e., a very selective Fabrizio De Ponti, Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical drug displaying a single receptor mechanism capable of controlling IBS symptoms? (b) IBS Sciences, University of Bologna, Via is a “functional disorder” where complex neuroimmune and brain-gut interactions occur Irnerio, 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy. and minimal inflammation is often documented:
    [Show full text]
  • Peripheral Kappa Opioid Receptor Activation Drives Cold Hypersensitivity in Mice
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.04.325118; this version posted October 4, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Peripheral kappa opioid receptor activation drives cold hypersensitivity in mice Manish K. Madasu1,2,3, Loc V. Thang1,2,3, Priyanka Chilukuri1,3, Sree Palanisamy1,2, Joel S. Arackal1,2, Tayler D. Sheahan3,4, Audra M. Foshage3, Richard A. Houghten6, Jay P. McLaughlin5.6, Jordan G. McCall1,2,3, Ream Al-Hasani1,2,3 1Center for Clinical Pharmacology, St. Louis College of Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. 2Department of Pharmaceutical and Administrative Sciences, St. Louis College of Pharmacy, St. Louis, MO, USA 3Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Center, Washington University. St. Louis, MO, USA. 4 Division of Biology and Biomedical Science, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA 5Department of Pharmacodynamics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 6Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies, Port St. Lucie, FL, USA Corresponding Author: Dr. Ream Al-Hasani Center for Clinical Pharmacology St. Louis College of Pharmacy Washington University School of Medicine 660 South Euclid Campus Box 8054 St. Louis MO, 63110 [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.04.325118; this version posted October 4, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae: Lin Chang
    CURRICULUM VITAE LIN CHANG, M.D. Professor of Medicine Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA PERSONAL HISTORY: Office Address: G. Oppenheimer Center for Neurobiology of Stress and Resilience 10833 Le Conte Avenue CHS 42-210 Los Angeles, CA 90095-7378 (310) 206-0192; FAX (310) 825-1919 EDUCATION: 1978 - 1982 University of California, Los Angeles, Degree: B.S. Biochemistry 1982 - 1986 UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Degree: M.D. 1986 - 1987 Internship: Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Internal Medicine 1987 - 1989 Residency: Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Internal Medicine 1989 - 1990 Research Fellowship: Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology 1990 - 1992 Clinical Fellowship: UCLA Integrated Program, Gastroenterology BOARD CERTIFICATION: ABIM: Internal Medicine 1989 Gastroenterology 1993, recertification 2014 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 2006- present Professor of Medicine-in-Residence, Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA 2000 - 2006 Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA 1997 - 2000 Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, UCLA School of Medicine Chang 2 1993 - 1997 Assistant Professor of Medicine-in-Residence, UCLA, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center 1992 - 1993 Associate Consultant, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, Department of Gastroenterology PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: 2017 – present Vice-Chief, Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,687,445 B2 Li (45) Date of Patent: Jun
    USOO9687445B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,687,445 B2 Li (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 27, 2017 (54) ORAL FILM CONTAINING OPIATE (56) References Cited ENTERC-RELEASE BEADS U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (75) Inventor: Michael Hsin Chwen Li, Warren, NJ 7,871,645 B2 1/2011 Hall et al. (US) 2010/0285.130 A1* 11/2010 Sanghvi ........................ 424/484 2011 0033541 A1 2/2011 Myers et al. 2011/0195989 A1* 8, 2011 Rudnic et al. ................ 514,282 (73) Assignee: LTS Lohmann Therapie-Systeme AG, Andernach (DE) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS CN 101703,777 A 2, 2001 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this DE 10 2006 O27 796 A1 12/2007 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WOOO,32255 A1 6, 2000 U.S.C. 154(b) by 338 days. WO WO O1/378O8 A1 5, 2001 WO WO 2007 144080 A2 12/2007 (21) Appl. No.: 13/445,716 (Continued) OTHER PUBLICATIONS (22) Filed: Apr. 12, 2012 Pharmaceutics, edited by Cui Fude, the fifth edition, People's Medical Publishing House, Feb. 29, 2004, pp. 156-157. (65) Prior Publication Data Primary Examiner — Bethany Barham US 2013/0273.162 A1 Oct. 17, 2013 Assistant Examiner — Barbara Frazier (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — ProPat, L.L.C. (51) Int. Cl. (57) ABSTRACT A6 IK 9/00 (2006.01) A control release and abuse-resistant opiate drug delivery A6 IK 47/38 (2006.01) oral wafer or edible oral film dosage to treat pain and A6 IK 47/32 (2006.01) substance abuse is provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Receptorsreceptors
    OPIOIDOPIOID RECEPTORSRECEPTORS defined or “classical” types of opioid receptor µ,dk and . Alistair Corbett, Sandy McKnight and Graeme Genes encoding for these receptors have been cloned.5, Henderson 6,7,8 More recently, cDNA encoding an “orphan” receptor Dr Alistair Corbett is Lecturer in the School of was identified which has a high degree of homology to Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow the “classical” opioid receptors; on structural grounds Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, this receptor is an opioid receptor and has been named Glasgow G4 0BA, UK. ORL (opioid receptor-like).9 As would be predicted from 1 Dr Sandy McKnight is Associate Director, Parke- their known abilities to couple through pertussis toxin- Davis Neuroscience Research Centre, sensitive G-proteins, all of the cloned opioid receptors Cambridge University Forvie Site, Robinson possess the same general structure of an extracellular Way, Cambridge CB2 2QB, UK. N-terminal region, seven transmembrane domains and Professor Graeme Henderson is Professor of intracellular C-terminal tail structure. There is Pharmacology and Head of Department, pharmacological evidence for subtypes of each Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical receptor and other types of novel, less well- Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, characterised opioid receptors,eliz , , , , have also been Bristol BS8 1TD, UK. postulated. Thes -receptor, however, is no longer regarded as an opioid receptor. Introduction Receptor Subtypes Preparations of the opium poppy papaver somniferum m-Receptor subtypes have been used for many hundreds of years to relieve The MOR-1 gene, encoding for one form of them - pain. In 1803, Sertürner isolated a crystalline sample of receptor, shows approximately 50-70% homology to the main constituent alkaloid, morphine, which was later shown to be almost entirely responsible for the the genes encoding for thedk -(DOR-1), -(KOR-1) and orphan (ORL ) receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Compounds That Are Effective As Selective
    (19) & (11) EP 1 505 974 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A61K 31/445 (2006.01) A61K 31/40 (2006.01) 22.04.2009 Bulletin 2009/17 A61K 31/485 (2006.01) A61K 31/135 (2006.01) A61P 3/04 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 03752716.5 (86) International application number: (22) Date of filing: 28.04.2003 PCT/EP2003/004428 (87) International publication number: WO 2003/097051 (27.11.2003 Gazette 2003/48) (54) USE OF COMPOUNDS THAT ARE EFFECTIVE AS SELECTIVE OPIATE RECEPTOR MODULATORS VERWENDUNG VON VERBINDUNGEN, DIE ALS SELEKTIVE OPIAT-REZEPTOR- MODULATOREN WIRKSAM SIND UTILISATION DE COMPOSES S’AVERANT EFFICACES EN TANT QUE MODULATEURS SELECTIFS DES RECEPTEURS DES OPIACES (84) Designated Contracting States: (56) References cited: AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR WO-A-01/98267 WO-A-02/13801 HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR WO-A-03/048113 US-A- 4 889 860 Designated Extension States: US-B1- 6 569 449 LT LV • MORLEY J E ET AL: "EFFECT OF (30) Priority: 17.05.2002 EP 02011047 BUTORPHANOL TARTRATE ON FOOD AND WATER CONSUMPTION IN HUMANS" (43) Date of publication of application: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 16.02.2005 Bulletin 2005/07 vol. 42, no. 6, 1985, pages 1175-1178, XP008022098 ISSN: 0002-9165 (73) Proprietor: Tioga Pharmaceuticals, Inc. • MENDELSON SCOTT D: "Treatment of anorexia San Diego, CA 92121 (US) nervosa with tramadol." AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Association Between N-Desmethylclozapine and Clozapine-Induced Sialorrhea
    JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 29, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.000164 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. 1 Title page Association between N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine-induced sialorrhea: Involvement of increased nocturnal salivary secretion via muscarinic receptors by N- desmethylclozapine Downloaded from Authors and Affiliations: Shuhei Ishikawa, PhD1, 2, a, Masaki Kobayashi, PhD1, 3, *, Naoki Hashimoto, PhD, jpet.aspetjournals.org MD4, Hideaki Mikami, BPharm1, Akihiko Tanimura, PhD5, Katsuya Narumi, PhD1, Ayako Furugen, PhD1, Ichiro Kusumi, PhD, MD4, and Ken Iseki, PhD1 at ASPET Journals on September 23, 2021 1 Laboratory of Clinical Pharmaceutics & Therapeutics, Division of Pharmasciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University 2 Department of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital 3 Education Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University 4 Department of Psychiatry, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine 5 Department of Pharmacology, School of Dentistry, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido a Present address: Department of Psychiatry, Hokkaido University Hospital JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 29, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.000164 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. 2 Running title page Association between N-desmethylclozapine and CIS Corresponding author: Masaki Kobayashi Downloaded from Laboratory of Clinical Pharmaceutics & Therapeutics, Division of Pharmasciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12-jo, Nishi-6-chome, jpet.aspetjournals.org Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan. Phone/Fax: +81-11-706-3772/3235. E-mail: [email protected] at ASPET Journals on September 23, 2021 Number of text pages: 25 Number of tables: 1 Number of figures: 6 Number of words in the Abstract: 249 Number of words in the Introduction: 686 Number of words in the Discussion: 1492 JPET Fast Forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Opioid Therapy and Chronic Noncancer Pain
    GUIDELINE CPD Guideline for opioid therapy and chronic noncancer pain Jason W. Busse DC PhD, Samantha Craigie MSc, David N. Juurlink MD PhD, D. Norman Buckley MD, Li Wang PhD, Rachel J. Couban MA MISt, Thomas Agoritsas MD PhD, Elie A. Akl MD PhD, Alonso Carrasco-Labra DDS MSc, Lynn Cooper BES, Chris Cull, Bruno R. da Costa PT PhD, Joseph W. Frank MD MPH, Gus Grant AB LLB MD, Alfonso Iorio MD PhD, Navindra Persaud MD MSc, Sol Stern MD, Peter Tugwell MD MSc, Per Olav Vandvik MD PhD, Gordon H. Guyatt MD MSc n Cite as: CMAJ 2017 May 8;189:E659-66. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170363 CMAJ podcasts: author interview at https://soundcloud.com/cmajpodcasts/170363-guide See related article www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.170431 hronic noncancer pain includes any painful condition that persists for at least three months and is not associated KEY POINTS with malignant disease.1 According to seven national sur- • We recommend optimization of nonopioid pharmacotherapy Cveys conducted between 1994 and 2008, 15%–19% of Canadian and nonpharmacologic therapy, rather than a trial of opioids, adults live with chronic noncancer pain.2 Chronic noncancer pain for patients with chronic noncancer pain. interferes with activities of daily living, has a major negative • Patients with chronic noncancer pain may be offered a trial of impact on quality of life and physical function,3 and is the leading opioids only after they have been optimized on nonopioid cause of health resource utilization and disability among working - therapy, including nondrug measures. age adults.4,5 • We suggest avoiding opioid therapy for patients with a history of In North America, clinicians commonly prescribe opioids for substance use disorder (including alcohol) or active mental illness, and opioid therapy should be avoided in cases of active substance acute pain, palliative care (in particular, for patients with cancer) use disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid and Robust Analysis Method for Quantifying Antidepressants and Major Metabolites in Human Serum by UHPLC-MS/MS
    PO-CON1352E Rapid and Robust Analysis Method for Quantifying Antidepressants and Major Metabolites in Human Serum by UHPLC-MS/MS ASMS 2013 WP-095 Vincent Goudriaan1, Christ Pijnenburg2, Jacob Diepenbroek2, Jan Giesbertsen2, Annemieke Vermeulen Windsant-v.d. Tweel2 1Shimadzu Benelux BV, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands. 2ZANOB BV, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands. Rapid and Robust Analysis Method for Quantifying Antidepressants and Major Metabolites in Human Serum by UHPLC-MS/MS 1. Introduction Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antidepressants is administered drugs, metabolites or endogenic compounds. one of the most widely utilized analysis in clinical labs in UHPLC-MS/MS is much more sensitive, more selective, and Dutch hospitals nowadays. Traditionally quantitation of if robust the perfect replacement of routine HPLC analysis. antidepressants is performed by means of HPLC with Due to simplified sample prep, faster analysis and less diode-array detection (DAD). Obvious disadvantages of the solvent consumption UHPLC-MS/MS is much more cost latter method are: sensitivity, selectivity and possibility of effective. UHPLC-MS/MS methods will replace routine HPLC false positives as a result of co-elution with other methods in clinical labs. 2. Methods and Materials Human serum samples were extracted by means of off-line solid phase extraction. The extracts were analyzed with a Shimadzu Nexera UHPLC combined with a LCMS-8040 Tandem Mass Spectrometer. 5 µL of sample was injected with a SIL-30AC autosampler. 2-1. Sample Preparation Standards both for calibration and control are ready made serum standards. The standards are pretreated in the same way as the samples. 1. Precondition SPE material1 with 1 mL 3% ammonia in acetonitrile 2.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/0245287 A1 Holaday Et Al
    US 20110245287A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/0245287 A1 Holaday et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 6, 2011 (54) HYBRD OPOD COMPOUNDS AND Publication Classification COMPOSITIONS (51) Int. Cl. A6II 3/4748 (2006.01) C07D 489/02 (2006.01) (76) Inventors: John W. Holaday, Bethesda, MD A6IP 25/04 (2006.01) (US); Philip Magistro, Randolph, (52) U.S. Cl. ........................................... 514/282:546/45 NJ (US) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed are hybrid opioid compounds, mixed opioid salts, (21) Appl. No.: 13/024,298 compositions comprising the hybrid opioid compounds and mixed opioid salts, and methods of use thereof. More particu larly, in one aspect the hybrid opioid compound includes at (22) Filed: Feb. 9, 2011 least two opioid compounds that are covalently bonded to a linker moiety. In another aspect, the hybrid opioid compound relates to mixed opioid salts comprising at least two different Related U.S. Application Data opioid compounds or an opioid compound and a different active agent. Also disclosed are pharmaceutical composi (60) Provisional application No. 61/302,657, filed on Feb. tions, as well as to methods of treating pain in humans using 9, 2010. the hybrid compounds and mixed opioid salts. Patent Application Publication Oct. 6, 2011 Sheet 1 of 3 US 2011/0245287 A1 Oral antinociception of morphine, oxycodone and prodrug combinations in CD1 mice s Tigkg -- Morphine (2.80 mg/kg (1.95 - 4.02, 30' peak time -- (Oxycodone (1.93 mg/kg (1.33 - 2,65)) 30 peak time -- Oxy. Mor (1:1) (4.84 mg/kg (3.60 - 8.50) 60 peak tire --MLN 2-3 peak, effect at a hors 24% with closes at 2.5 art to rigg - D - MLN 2-45 (6.60 mg/kg (5.12 - 8.51)} 60 peak time Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening of 300 Drugs in Blood Utilizing Second Generation
    Forensic Screening of 300 Drugs in Blood Utilizing Exactive Plus High-Resolution Accurate Mass Spectrometer and ExactFinder Software Kristine Van Natta, Marta Kozak, Xiang He Forensic Toxicology use Only Drugs analyzed Compound Compound Compound Atazanavir Efavirenz Pyrilamine Chlorpropamide Haloperidol Tolbutamide 1-(3-Chlorophenyl)piperazine Des(2-hydroxyethyl)opipramol Pentazocine Atenolol EMDP Quinidine Chlorprothixene Hydrocodone Tramadol 10-hydroxycarbazepine Desalkylflurazepam Perimetazine Atropine Ephedrine Quinine Cilazapril Hydromorphone Trazodone 5-(p-Methylphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin Desipramine Phenacetin Benperidol Escitalopram Quinupramine Cinchonine Hydroquinine Triazolam 6-Acetylcodeine Desmethylcitalopram Phenazone Benzoylecgonine Esmolol Ranitidine Cinnarizine Hydroxychloroquine Trifluoperazine Bepridil Estazolam Reserpine 6-Monoacetylmorphine Desmethylcitalopram Phencyclidine Cisapride HydroxyItraconazole Trifluperidol Betaxolol Ethyl Loflazepate Risperidone 7(2,3dihydroxypropyl)Theophylline Desmethylclozapine Phenylbutazone Clenbuterol Hydroxyzine Triflupromazine Bezafibrate Ethylamphetamine Ritonavir 7-Aminoclonazepam Desmethyldoxepin Pholcodine Clobazam Ibogaine Trihexyphenidyl Biperiden Etifoxine Ropivacaine 7-Aminoflunitrazepam Desmethylmirtazapine Pimozide Clofibrate Imatinib Trimeprazine Bisoprolol Etodolac Rufinamide 9-hydroxy-risperidone Desmethylnefopam Pindolol Clomethiazole Imipramine Trimetazidine Bromazepam Felbamate Secobarbital Clomipramine Indalpine Trimethoprim Acepromazine Desmethyltramadol Pipamperone
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2012/109445 Al 16 August 2012 (16.08.2012) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2012/109445 Al 16 August 2012 (16.08.2012) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 31/485 (2006.01) A61P 25/04 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, (21) International Application Number: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, PCT/US20 12/024482 DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, (22) International Filing Date: HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, ' February 2012 (09.02.2012) KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, (25) Filing Language: English OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SC, SD, (26) Publication Language: English SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 13/024,298 9 February 201 1 (09.02.201 1) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): QRX- GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, PHARMA LTD.
    [Show full text]