New Jerse'y Organized Militia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Jerse'y Organized Militia NEW JERSEY ORGANIZED MILITIA The following National Guard account is a necessarily incomplete list of the military and naval units of the State of New Jersey. The 1865-1950 period is emphasized almost exclusively with some added weight on the 1869 through 1940 periods, because that is the period in which these units were issued their own medallion awards. Sources for this list, particularly regimental histories, are scarce. Listed for each unit is its official designation, its main location (if known) or general location (if known); its nickname (if any is known) which is placed in parenthesis; its history and connection with other units in brief synopsis; and its motto in quotes followed by a translation if the motto is not itself in English (if any such motto is known).i Prior to the British conquest of New Netherland in 1664, the Dutch maintained a somewhat disorganized force in the colony, which covered parts of modern New Jersey and New York. Semi-regular soldiers in the employ of the Dutch West India Company were backed up by the Burgher Guard, a militia organization. Under the new British law of 1668, men between the ages of sixteen and sixty were obligated to serve in the militia. Ordinary militiamen could avoid service by paying a fine in lieu of showing up for drill, and members of certain professions, from ministers to captains of ships of a certain size and government officials, were exempt from duty. According to the law a militiaman was obligated to provide his own weapon, “a good and sufficient firelock” as well as a pound of powder and “24 bullets fitted to the gun,” and tools for cleaning and maintaining his musket. Militiamen were allowed freedom as to how to prepare and carry their ammunition, either as paper cartridges in a cartridge box or with powder charges carried separately from balls in a “bandoleer” of wooden bottles, or a powder horn. Periodic militia laws essentially restating the points of the initial legislation were passed in 1679, 1682 and 1693. Militia service was designed to be limited and chiefly defensive. In 1698 the Assembly declared that no “free man shall be compelled, enforced, pressed or arrayed” to leave his township for military service save to repel an invasion or “by Special Act of the General Assembly.” New Jersey’s large Quaker population, principally in West Jersey, lobbied for exemption from militia duty due to their religion’s pacifist doctrine, and the West Jersey proprietors were more than willing to grant those exemptions. In 1683, after a number of legislative battles, Quakers were officially exempted from duty in East Jersey without requirement to pay a fine or provide a substitute, which weakened the force both in actuality and morale, and left no effective militia in West Jersey when the entire colony came under royal control in 1702. Volunteer forces from the colony and later the state, not necessarily a part of the state’s organized militia, rendered service to the British for various periods of time during the French and Indian Wars and the United States in the American Revolution, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, the Civil War and the Spanish American War. Nationally, the militia’s role as a reserve force varied. In the Indian wars of the early 1790s it performed poorly, but in New Jersey, the state’s Militia performed well during the Whiskey Rebellion and as a coastal defense force during the War of 1812 Following the War of 1812, the New Jersey militia deteriorated. Into a group of separate units over which there was minimal central control, rules, or regulations. It became a social club for some, and alcohol flowed on drill days. On the eve of the Civil War New Jersey’s militia was described by one author as “a system of shreds and patches.” During the war, the state created the New Jersey Rifle Corps, intended to be an elite militia type organization alongside the traditional militia. This act was the beginning of the State’s modern military force. During the Civil War, many New Jerseyans served in the Union Army. The state claimed 88,500 men served, but considering administrative errors and reenlistments, the number is probably closer to 73,000,still a substantial number, which included over 3,000 New Jerseyans who served in the United States Colored Troops and the Navy. The success of the well-organized New Jersey Rifle Corps led to the passage of a law in 1869, merging the remnants of the old militia with the Rifle Corps to form the New Jersey National Guard in the organizational structure it was to maintain for many years without change and to which to a certain extent is still maintained. albeit with certain major differences to comply with the 1903 Federal Dick Act and the 1916 US National Defense Act. The post WW I and WW II re-designations of many traditional units caused some loss of unit identities and esprit de corps, but is offset in the opinion of many experts by the successful fulfillment of newer military requirements caused by the evolution of in modern warfare, tactics and equipment. The New Jersey Naval Militia was founded in 1894 and, organized into two detachments, the Battalion of the East, and the Battalion of the West, began active operations the following year. The organization, activated in many but not all states, was intended to act as a naval reserve to be integrated into regular navy ship crews in time of war. An attempt to cut state spending by disbanding the Naval Militia failed in the New Jersey legislature in 1897, and a contemporary newspaper account of that year flatteringly described the unit as “composed principally of business and professional men.” The active duty navy provided advising officers and training ships to the militia In 1905 the Naval Militia, now classified by the New Jersey Adjutant General as the “Naval Reserve” was divided into two battalions. The first battalion, with a strength of 150 officers and men, well below its authorized strength of 273, was stationed in Hoboken, with a headquarters ship, the USS Portsmouth, on the Hudson River. The second battalion, with headquarters on the USS Huntress on the Delaware River in Camden, mustered 162 officers and men. By the 1960’s the Naval Reserve was almost totally dormant. During WW I, the New Jersey State Reserve Militia was created by the state to replace the federalized National Guard with men not fit for US service or who had not been drafted, although membership did not exempt men from the federal military draft if they were eligible. During WW II, the New Jersey Guard was created to replace the federalized National Guard, with the same characteristics overall as the Reserve Militia of WW I. The State’s first aviation unit was created in 1928-1929 with the organization of the 119th Observation Squadron, also known as the 44th Division Aviation Squadron. In 1947, when the Air Force separated from the army, the Air National Guard was separated from the Army National Guard. In 1948 the New Jersey Department of Defense was created to replace the Adjutant General, Quartermaster General, State Military Board and Civil Defense, headed by The New Jersey Chief of Staff. The Governor is the Commander in Chief of all Armed Forces of the State. The title Chief of Staff reverted to Adjutant General in 1984 and remains so today. CORPS and DIVISIONS: The New Jersey Rifle Corps, organized in 1865 under an act of the Legislature, consisted of a Brigade of 32 Companies. It was more organized than the prior New Jersey Militia units and provided the model on which the New Jersey National Guard was organized under the Act of the 93rd New Jersey Legislature in 1869. The New Jersey Rifle Corps was incorporated into the new National Guard in 1869 and the Rifle Cops ceased to exist as a separate organization. The Act creating the National Guard of New Jersey on, March 9, 1869; allowed for no more than 60 companies of Infantry, and artillery batteries not more than two and cavalry companies not more than six, as maybe authorized by the Commander and Chief, to be organized into Brigades, in number not more than three and be compromised in one division, that each county of the state shall be entitled to at least one of said companies. During the period of 1869 through 1917 the state of New Jersey’s military never exceeded two brigades. The New Jersey Division was the informal designation of all units of the National Guard collectively from 1869 to WW I. During the period 1865-1869 the New Jersey Militia consisted of the Newark Brigade: Veteran Regiment and Battalion, Newark Cavalry and Newark City Battery. The Hudson Brigade: 1st & 2nd Regiments, Hudson County Artillery, also the Independent Veteran Battalion of Paterson, Caldwell Union Artillery, and the Monmouth Veteran Artillery. Brigadier General Theodore Runyan, who was also a Brevet Major General in the Militia commanded both the Rifle Corps and Militia. In 1869 the New Jersey National Guard was composed of the 1st Brigade; 1st, 2nd, 4th & 5th Veteran Regiments, 1st & 2nd Battalions, and Battery A (Hoboken / Weehawken, New Jersey) from Essex, Hudson, and Bergen Counties. 2nd Brigade: 3rd Regiment, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th Battalions. Battery B was organized in 1870, Camden, New Jersey. The artillery batteries were replaced by Gatling gun batteries in 1878. Subsequent Organizations • 29th Division (Blue and Grey DIV); formed in 1917 out of National Guard units from New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia.
Recommended publications
  • MAJOR GENERAL RAYMOND F. REES the Adjutant General, Oregon National Guard
    MAJOR GENERAL RAYMOND F. REES The Adjutant General, Oregon National Guard Major General Raymond F. Rees assumed duties as The Adjutant General for Oregon on July 1, 2005. He is responsible for providing the State of Oregon and the United States with a ready force of citizen soldiers and airmen, equipped and trained to respond to any contingency, natural or manmade. He directs, manages, and supervises the administration, discipline, organization, training and mobilization of the Oregon National Guard, the Oregon State Defense Force, the Joint Force Headquarters and the Office of Oregon Emergency Management. He is also assigned as the Governor’s Homeland Security Advisor. He develops and coordinates all policies, plans and programs of the Oregon National Guard in concert with the Governor and legislature of the State. He began his military career in the United States Army as a West Point cadet in July 1962. Prior to his current assignment, Major General Rees had numerous active duty and Army National Guard assignments to include: service in the Republic of Vietnam as a cavalry troop commander; commander of the 116th Armored Calvary Regiment; nearly nine years as the Adjutant General of Oregon; Director of the Army National Guard, National Guard Bureau; over five years service as Vice Chief, National Guard Bureau; 14 months as Acting Chief, National Guard Bureau; Chief of Staff (dual-hatted), Headquarters North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM). NORAD is a binational, Canada and United States command. EDUCATION: US Military Academy, West Point, New York, BS University of Oregon, JD (Law) Command and General Staff College (Honor Graduate) Command and General Staff College, Pre-Command Course Harvard University Executive Program in National and International Security Senior Reserve Component Officer Course, United States Army War College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 1 ASSIGNMENTS: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • This Index Lists the Army Units for Which Records Are Available at the Eisenhower Library
    DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS U.S. ARMY: Unit Records, 1917-1950 Linear feet: 687 Approximate number of pages: 1,300,000 The U.S. Army Unit Records collection (formerly: U.S. Army, U.S. Forces, European Theater: Selected After Action Reports, 1941-45) primarily spans the period from 1917 to 1950, with the bulk of the material covering the World War II years (1942-45). The collection is comprised of organizational and operational records and miscellaneous historical material from the files of army units that served in World War II. The collection was originally in the custody of the World War II Records Division (now the Modern Military Records Branch), National Archives and Records Service. The material was withdrawn from their holdings in 1960 and sent to the Kansas City Federal Records Center for shipment to the Eisenhower Library. The records were received by the Library from the Kansas City Records Center on June 1, 1962. Most of the collection contained formerly classified material that was bulk-declassified on June 29, 1973, under declassification project number 735035. General restrictions on the use of records in the National Archives still apply. The collection consists primarily of material from infantry, airborne, cavalry, armor, artillery, engineer, and tank destroyer units; roughly half of the collection consists of material from infantry units, division through company levels. Although the collection contains material from over 2,000 units, with each unit forming a separate series, every army unit that served in World War II is not represented. Approximately seventy-five percent of the documents are from units in the European Theater of Operations, about twenty percent from the Pacific theater, and about five percent from units that served in the western hemisphere during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brigade Combat Team (BCT): a Revolution in Organizational Structure
    University of Southern Maine USM Digital Commons Muskie School Capstones and Dissertations Student Scholarship 12-2020 The Brigade Combat Team (BCT): A Revolution in Organizational Structure Adam Davis University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/muskie_capstones Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Infrastructure Commons, Military and Veterans Studies Commons, Nonprofit Administration and Management Commons, Operations and Supply Chain Management Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons, and the Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Adam, "The Brigade Combat Team (BCT): A Revolution in Organizational Structure" (2020). Muskie School Capstones and Dissertations. 165. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/muskie_capstones/165 This Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at USM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Muskie School Capstones and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of USM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Brigade Combat Team (BCT): A Revolution in Organizational Structure Adam Davis Capstone paper for Master of Policy, Planning, and Management Program Muskie School of Public Service University of Southern Maine December 2020 Professor Joseph McDonnell, Capstone Advisor THE BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM (BCT) 2 Abstract This paper explores the U.S. Army’s force reorganization around the Brigade Combat Team (BCT), which began in 2002. The BCT shifted how various army units interacted by changing the echelon at which different types of units report to a single commander, essentially creating self-sufficient units of about 2,500 soldiers instead of the previous self-sufficient units of about 15,000 soldiers.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Military's Force Structure: a Primer
    CHAPTER 2 Department of the Army Overview when the service launched a “modularity” initiative, the The Department of the Army includes the Army’s active Army was organized for nearly a century around divisions component; the two parts of its reserve component, the (which involved fewer but larger formations, with 12,000 Army Reserve and the Army National Guard; and all to 18,000 soldiers apiece). During that period, units in federal civilians employed by the service. By number of Army divisions could be separated into ad hoc BCTs military personnel, the Department of the Army is the (typically, three BCTs per division), but those units were biggest of the military departments. It also has the largest generally not organized to operate independently at any operation and support (O&S) budget. The Army does command level below the division. (For a description of not have the largest total budget, however, because it the Army’s command levels, see Box 2-1.) In the current receives significantly less funding to develop and acquire structure, BCTs are permanently organized for indepen- weapon systems than the other military departments do. dent operations, and division headquarters exist to pro- vide command and control for operations that involve The Army is responsible for providing the bulk of U.S. multiple BCTs. ground combat forces. To that end, the service is orga- nized primarily around brigade combat teams (BCTs)— The Army is distinct not only for the number of ground large combined-arms formations that are designed to combat forces it can provide but also for the large num- contain 4,400 to 4,700 soldiers apiece and include infan- ber of armored vehicles in its inventory and for the wide try, artillery, engineering, and other types of units.1 The array of support units it contains.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Units Style Contents
    Military Units Style - Colors Unknown Unknown, Pending 2 Friendly Hostile Hostile, S, J, Faker 2 Neutral 1 Neutral 3 Weather 3 Weather 4 Area Blue Copyright © 1999 - 2004 ESRI. Located in: ArcGIS\Bin\Styles\Military Units.style All Rights Reserved. Version: ArcGIS 8.3 1 Military Units Style - Fill Symbols Unknown Unknown, Pending 2 Friendly Hostile Hostile, S, J, Faker 2 Neutral 1 Neutral 3 Weather 3 Weather 4 Area Copyright © 1999 - 2004 ESRI. Located in: ArcGIS\Bin\Styles\Military Units.style All Rights Reserved. Version: ArcGIS 8.3 2 Military Units Style - Marker Symbols à Infantry Soldier  Helicopter - AH Apache Å Missile Launcher Æ Frigate Ê Generic Tank Ç Destroyer Ë Enemy Tank È Submarine SSBN Ì B-2 Stealth É Submarine Attack Ó F-14 Tomcat À Torpedo Ô Fighter ß Explosion Õ FA-18 ! Unit Ö F-5 " Headquarters Unit Ù Fighter # Logistics/Admin Installation Ú Fighter $ Theater Ü Generic Fighter % Corps Ò E-3 AWACS & Supply unit Ï Helicopter - CH-46 Chinook ' Squad Ð Helicopter - AH Cobra ( Section/Platoon Copyright © 1999 - 2004 ESRI. Located in: ArcGIS\Bin\Styles\Military Units.style All Rights Reserved. Version: ArcGIS 8.3 3 Military Units Style - Marker Symbols ) Platoon/Squadron 8 Infantry Battalion * Company/Battery/Troop 9 Infantry Regiment + Battalion/Squadron : Infantry Brigade , Regiment ; Infantry Division - Brigade < Infantry Corps . Division = Infantry Army / Corps > Infantry Mechanized Squad 0 Army ? Infantry Mechanized Section 1 Infantry @ Infantry Mechanized Platoon 2 Infantry Mechanized A Infantry Mechanized Company 3 Armor B Infantry Mechanized Battalion Company 4 Infantry Squad C Infantry Mechanized Regiment 5 Infantry Section D Infantry Mechanized Brigade 6 Infantry Platoon E Infantry Mechanized Division 7 Infantry Company F Infantry Mechanized Corps Copyright © 1999 - 2004 ESRI.
    [Show full text]
  • Fm 1-114 Air Cavalry Squadron and Troop Operations
    FM 1-114 AIR CAVALRY SQUADRON AND TROOP OPERATIONS DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PCN 32000075200 *FM 1-114 Field Manual Headquarters No. 1-114 Department of the Army Washington, DC, 1 February 2000 Air Cavalry Squadron and Troop Operations Contents Page PREFACE.......................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1 RECONNAISSANCE AND SECURITY HELICOPTER FUNDAMENTALS............... 1-0 Section I—Primary Roles and Missions.......................................................... 1-0 Essential Characteristics of Army Operations ..................................................... 1-0 Squadron Mission............................................................................................. 1-1 Troop Mission .................................................................................................. 1-2 Capabilities and Limitations ............................................................................... 1-2 Section II—Organizations .............................................................................. 1-3 Cavalry Organizations ....................................................................................... 1-3 Regimental Aviation Squadron ........................................................................... 1-3 Division Cavalry Squadron ................................................................................. 1-4 Air Cavalry Squadron .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Korean War
    N ATIO N AL A RCHIVES R ECORDS R ELATI N G TO The Korean War R EFE R ENCE I NFO R MAT I ON P A P E R 1 0 3 COMPILED BY REBEccA L. COLLIER N ATIO N AL A rc HIVES A N D R E C O R DS A DMI N IST R ATIO N W ASHI N GTO N , D C 2 0 0 3 N AT I ONAL A R CH I VES R ECO R DS R ELAT I NG TO The Korean War COMPILED BY REBEccA L. COLLIER R EFE R ENCE I NFO R MAT I ON P A P E R 103 N ATIO N AL A rc HIVES A N D R E C O R DS A DMI N IST R ATIO N W ASHI N GTO N , D C 2 0 0 3 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. National Archives records relating to the Korean War / compiled by Rebecca L. Collier.—Washington, DC : National Archives and Records Administration, 2003. p. ; 23 cm.—(Reference information paper ; 103) 1. United States. National Archives and Records Administration.—Catalogs. 2. Korean War, 1950-1953 — United States —Archival resources. I. Collier, Rebecca L. II. Title. COVER: ’‘Men of the 19th Infantry Regiment work their way over the snowy mountains about 10 miles north of Seoul, Korea, attempting to locate the enemy lines and positions, 01/03/1951.” (111-SC-355544) REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 103: NATIONAL ARCHIVES RECORDS RELATING TO THE KOREAN WAR Contents Preface ......................................................................................xi Part I INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF THE PAPER ........................................................................................................................1 OVERVIEW OF THE ISSUES .................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 166 Public Law 86-500-.June 8, 1960 [74 Stat
    166 PUBLIC LAW 86-500-.JUNE 8, 1960 [74 STAT. Public Law 86-500 June 8. 1960 AN ACT [H» R. 10777] To authorize certain construction at military installation!^, and for other pnriwses. He it enacted hy the Hemite and House of Representatives of the 8tfiction^'Acf°^ I'raited States of America in Congress assemoJed, I960. TITLE I ''^^^* SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con- \'erting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equip­ ment, for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES I'ECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Training facilities, medical facilities, and utilities, $6,221,000. Benicia Arsenal, California: Utilities, $337,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Utilities and ground improvements, $353,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey: Research, development, and test facilities, $850,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, Colorado: Operational facilities, $369,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Community facilities and utilities, $1,000,000. Umatilla Ordnance Depot, Oregon: Utilities and ground improve­ ments, $319,000. Watertow^n Arsenal, Massachusetts: Research, development, and test facilities, $1,849,000. White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico: Operational facilities and utilities, $1,2'33,000. (Quartermaster Corps) Fort Lee, Virginia: Administrative facilities and utilities, $577,000. Atlanta General Depot, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, $365,000. New Cumberland General Depot, Pennsylvania: Operational facili­ ties, $89,000. Richmond Quartermaster Depot, Virginia: Administrative facili­ ties, $478,000. Sharpe General Depot, California: Maintenance facilities, $218,000. (Chemical Corps) Army Chemical Center, Maryland: Operational facilities and com­ munity facilities, $843,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Infantry Platoon Tactical Standing Operating Procedure
    Infantry Platoon Tactical Standing Operating Procedure This publication is an extract mostly from FM 3-21.8 Infantry Rifle Platoon and Squad , but it also includes references from other FMs. It provides the tactical standing operating procedures for infantry platoons and squads and is tailored for ROTC cadet use. The procedures apply unless a leader makes a decision to deviate from them based on the factors of METT-TC. In such a case, the exception applies only to the particular situation for which the leader made the decision. CHAPTER 1 - DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................... 2 CHAPTER 2 - COMMAND AND CONTROL.............................................................. 6 SECTION I – TROOP LEADING PROCEDURES .................................................. 6 SECTION II – RISK MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 9 SECTION III - ORDERS ........................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 3 – OPERATIONS ..................................................................................... 14 SECTION I – FIRE CONTROL AND DISTRIBUTION ....................................... 14 SECTION II – RANGE CARDS AND SECTOR SKETCHES ............................. 16 SECTION III - MOVEMENT ................................................................................... 25 SECTION IV - COMMUNICATION ....................................................................... 27 SECTION V - REPORTS .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-92-78 Troop Reductions: Lessons Learned from Army's
    ---.. IJnitcd States Gemral Accounting Office GAO Report to the Secretary of Ikfense TROOP REDUCTIONS Lessons Learned From Army’s Approach to Inactivating the 9th Division ._ lllllll146735lo II GAO/NSIAIMX&78 . I United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-247235 June 9, 1992 The Honorable Richard B. Cheney The Secretary of Defense Dear Mr. Secretary: This report addresses the personnel and equipment practices used in one of the Army’s recent downsizing efforts-the inactivation of the 9th Infantry Division at Fort Lewis, Washington, and the activation of a separate brigade from division assets. The purpose of this effort was to determine if the practices used there had implications in future downsizing/restructuring efforts. This report contains conclusions, however, it makes no recommendations. We are sending copies of this report to the Secretary of the Army; the Director, Office of Management and Budget; and other interested parties. Copies will also be made available to others on request. Please contact me on (202) 275-3990 if you or your staff have any questions concerning this report. The major contributors to this report are listed in appendix III. Sincerely yours, Paul L. Jones Director Defense Force Management Issues Executive Summary Budgetary constraints and changing international conditions have caused Purpose the Congress and the executive branch to seek ways to reduce U.S. troop strength. GAO studied one of the Army’s downsizing efforts-inactivation of the 9th Infantry Division at Fort Lewis, Washington, and activation of a separate brigade from division units-to determine if personnel and equipment practices used there had implications for future efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Tank Platoon
    ATP 3-20.15 (FM 3-20.15) Tank Platoon December 2012 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Headquarters, Department of the Army This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (https//armypubs.us.army.mil/doctrine/ index.html). *ATP 3-20.15 (FM 3-20.15) Army Techniques and Procedures Headquarters No. 3-20.15 Department of the Army Washington, DC, 13 December 2012 Tank Platoon Contents Page PREFACE .................................................................... viii Chapter 1 TACTICAL FUNDAMENTALS ..................................... 1-1 Section I – Text References ....................................... 1-1 Section II – Overview.................................................. 1-1 Operational Environment .............................................. 1-1 Unified Land Operations ............................................... 1-2 Combat Power .............................................................. 1-2 Section III – Mission Command ................................. 1-4 Command ..................................................................... 1-4 Control .......................................................................... 1-5 Section IV – Command and Support Relationships .............................................................. 1-6 Command Relationships .............................................. 1-6 Support Relationships .................................................. 1-7 Section V – Planning Considerations ....................... 1-7 Operational Variables
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Smoke Operations Overview
    FM 3-101-1 CHAPTER 1 SMOKE OPERATIONS OVERVIEW Combat commanders refer to smoke as a two-edged sword. Smoke can assist a unit to succeed in battle or lead to its failure. There are many systems capable of providing smoke support: artillery, mortars, pots, grenades, aircraft, vehicles, and smoke generators. But only smoke generators are capable of providing a sustained, large-area smoke screen. This chapter will summarize the principles and applications of smoke in support of combat operations. FM 3-50, Smoke Operations, provides detailed guidance on the employment of smoke. Smoke unit leaders must understand the enemy, how the Army fights, and how smoke functions as a countermeasure to sensors and enemy reconnaissance, intelligence, surveillance, and target acquisition (RISTA). Potential enemy forces, how the Army fights, and electro-optical systems/sensors are explained in great detail in other publications (See References). This manual explains, in general terms, what the smoke unit leader needs to know about integrated smoke support (Chapter 1), explains the organizations and equipment available for generated smoke (Chapter 2), discusses planning and training necessary to engage smoke targets (Chapter 3). How to move and generate smoke is discussed in depth in Chapter 4. Chapters 5 - 6 outline the tactics, techniques and procedures for executing smoke support. Logistical planning considerations are found in Chapter 8. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE In September 1944 the 84th Smoke Generator Company was hastily recalled from its transportation duties to support the XX Corps crossing of the Moselle River near the town of Arnaville in eastern France. At the site of the crossing in the narrow valley of the Moselle, a railroad, a canal, and the river roughly parallel each other in a 500 yard belt (figure 1-1).
    [Show full text]