1 Poll Shows Public Less Critical of Government's Response to COVID

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Poll Shows Public Less Critical of Government's Response to COVID Poll shows public less critical of government’s response to COVID; Yamina slips By TOI STAFF Today The public view of the government’s handling of the pandemic is improving slightly, according to a poll published Tuesday. The Channel 12 poll, also showed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party making small gains at the expense of its rival Yamina ahead of the March election. Asked what they thought of the government’s handling of the COVID-19 crisis, 50 percent of respondents had a negative view while 47% had a positive view. In a poll published by the channel a month ago, 59% said they had a negative view and 39% had a positive outlook. Asked specifically about the economic aspects of the pandemic, 67% had a negative view of the government’s conduct, while 29% had a positive one — an improvement over the previous poll, which found 72% of respondents had a negative view and 25% saw the government response favorably. Meanwhile, Naftali Bennett’s Yamina party, which repeatedly criticized the government on its response to the virus, appeared to be weakening, and is on the verge of dropping down to single digits in projected Knesset seats. No party leader has a clear path to a Knesset majority. According to Tuesday’s poll, the so-called anti-Netanyahu bloc — made up of parties whose leaders have said they will not sit in a government with the prime minister — has 61 seats; the Likud plus ultra-Orthodox parties bloc has 44 seats, with the presumed Netanyahu ally Religious Zionism adding 5 more; and Yamina, as an undecided factor, has 10. Bennett has declared himself a candidate for prime minister, but has not ruled out sitting in a coalition with Likud. 1 Speaking to Channel 12 Tuesday night, Yamina’s Bennett bashed Netanyahu’s handling of the economy, highlighting the fact that no 2020 budget was passed despite the prime minister apparently claiming so during an interview Monday. “The prime minister sat here yesterday in a festive mood as if he had liberated Jerusalem, when in fact 5,400 people died,” Bennett said, berating what he called Netanyahu’s “patting himself on the shoulder.” “I can not criticize his rhetorical ability, but a million people are unemployed,” Bennett said. “There is a state to manage and it is not being managed.” During the first outbreak of the virus in the spring, unemployment figures issued by the Employment Service spiked as 800,000 people quickly lost work in Israel’s initial lockdown. They have since fluctuated as the country has moved in and out of restrictions and closures. Asked about his party’s falling polling numbers, Bennett said, “After the election, we will see the state of the seats. I need a few more seats to bring about a change of leadership… with 15 seats, it is possible to come and change the leadership in a real way.” It works: 0 deaths, only 4 severe cases among 523,000 fully vaccinated Israelis By NATHAN JEFFAY 11 February 2021 TOI An Israeli healthcare provider that has vaccinated half a million people with both doses of the Pfizer vaccine says that only 544 people — or 0.1% — have been subsequently diagnosed with the coronavirus, there have been four severe cases, and no people have died. That means the effectiveness rate stands at 93 percent, Maccabi Healthcare Services announced on Thursday, after comparing its immunized members to a “diverse” control group of unvaccinated members. Full protection against COVID-19 for people who have been vaccinated is believed to kick in a week after the second shot, so the Maccabi data covers all those of its members who are seven or more days after receiving that second dose. Maccabi’s statistics are being closely monitored around the world, for giving the first major insight into how the vaccine performs outside of clinical trials. And they are being widely hailed for indicating that real-word effectiveness is close to the 95% efficacy cited after Pfizer’s clinical trials. “This data unequivocally proves that the vaccine is very effective and we have no doubt that it has saved the lives of many Israelis,” said senior Maccabi official Dr. Miri Mizrahi Reuveni after the new data release. She stressed that among those who have vaccinated and become infected, the vast majority have experienced the coronavirus lightly. Out of the 523,000 fully vaccinated people, 544 were infected with COVID-19, of whom 15 needed hospitalization: Eight are in mild condition, three in moderate condition, and four in severe condition. Proposed bill: Public-facing staff must vaccinate or be tested to go to work By TOI STAFF Today, 10:27 Health Minister Yuli Edelstein will reportedly promote legislation aimed at reducing the number of unvaccinated people in public-facing workplaces by only allowing in workers who have vaccinated, recovered from the coronavirus, or recently tested negative. According to a report Wednesday by the Ynet news site, the legislation will be promoted in the coming days and is aimed at initially focusing on teaching staff who refuse to get inoculated as children head back to the classroom. Channel 12 reported Tuesday that, with between 10 percent and 30% of healthcare workers still unvaccinated, Israel is planning on making the inoculation mandatory for them, as are other vaccines. 2 Although the idea of legislation to compel or encourage people to get vaccinated has been floated in the past, it has previously been dismissed for not having political support or legal standing. However, Wednesday’s report said officials believe it is necessary in order to encourage Israelis who do not intend to get inoculated to reverse their position. The law will include “restriction on entering the business by an employee who is not recovered [from the virus] or vaccinated, or who did not present a negative result at the workplace, at the place and time to be determined by regulations,” the report said. The report said that the legislation would initially be targeted at teaching staff, medical workers and police officers, but that the legislation will include the phrase that the regulations “shall be determined with due regard to the scope of the people who come into contact with the employee, their characteristics, the nature of the business and the occupation, as well as taking into account those who have a medical justification for not being vaccinated.” The report did not give details on what sanctions those who refuse to get vaccinated or tested could face, nor on who would pay for the testing and how often it would be required. In the past Edelstein has said teachers would need to pay for their own tests if they did not get inoculated. The proposal to compel some workers to vaccinate is expected to face widespread opposition from unions and civil rights organizations. The Association for Civil Rights in Israel said the proposal was “illegal and infringes on the privacy and choices of the employee.” Edelstein announced on Wednesday that over 50 percent of Israelis age 30-plus have been vaccinated. The minister said that around 4,075,000 people have now received the first dose of the vaccine, with about 2,700,000 also having received the second shot. That amounts to around 44% of the country’s total population having now received the first dose of the coronavirus vaccine. Around 3 million Israelis are not eligible to be vaccinated, including those younger than 16 and people who have recovered from COVID-19, among other reasons. Vaccine hesitancy and skepticism have become a growing concern in recent weeks as Israel’s world-leading inoculation campaign has slowed. The Health Ministry is also pushing to amend public health ordinances to allow it to hand over personal data on who has or hasn’t been vaccinated to local authorities and the Education Ministry, in a bid to boost the vaccine campaign, Hebrew media reports said. Alongside the proposed legal measures, there have been a number of other initiatives to encourage people to get vaccinated, including free food, inoculations performed on forest trails and businesses offering incentives for employees to go and get the shot. On Tuesday, the Magen David Adom emergency service sent mobile vaccination units to inoculate students studying in yeshivas around the country. A number of yeshivas, where men study at close quarters, some in violation of the regulations, have seen major outbreaks throughout the course of the pandemic. “If Mohammed won’t come to the mountain, the mountain will come to Mohammed,” Jerusalem Mayor Moshe Lion said of the initiative in an interview with Channel 12. A senior paramedic told the outlet that the unit could inoculate up to 200 people an hour. To boost the vaccination rates, the Haredi Lemaanchem medical organization was even going into yeshivas that had seen some of the worst violations and mass gatherings, and setting up vaccination initiatives. “We want to turn the ultra-Orthodox areas into [low-infection] areas,” said Rabbi Yossi Erlich, the head of the organization. Additionally, the vaccination programs received the backing of leading ultra-Orthodox Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky, who has previously faced intense criticism for his handling of the pandemic and for rulings given to his followers. He has instructed schools to open in defiance of government decisions on several occasions, leading hundreds of institutions to illicitly open their doors throughout the pandemic. 3 Yair Lapid's election challenge: Threatening Netanyahu's Likud without getting too strong Jonathan Lis | Feb. 16, 2021 | Haaretz Yesh Atid is shaping up to be the second-largest party in the Knesset after the March 23 general election.
Recommended publications
  • Opinion New Government, New President, New Israel?
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 20, ISSUE 3 Studies Opinion New Government, New President, New Israel? Melanie Carina Schmoll, PhD Israel in summer 2021 – the end of the pandemic seems to be near. Israel opens up, almost all mask requirements are cancelled, international travel groups are welcome and even the individual guests are allowed to travel to the Holy Land with almost no restrictions. It seems Israel is back in pre-pandemic times. But it is not the same country anymore. Some fundamental changes have happened over the last few weeks. When, in March 2021, the Israelis had to vote again for the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset, it was for the fourth time within two and a half years. The outcome was almost the same as the three times before. Benjamin Nethanyahu, Israel´s long-time prime minister, won most of the seats with his Likud party. As the State of Israel is a parlamentary democracy the executive branch or the government draws its authority from the Parliament (the legislative branch) and needs its confidence. Therefore, the prime minister is not decided directly by the voters but depends instead on a process of bargaining among the various fractions elected to parliament. In Israel, no single party holds most of the seats in Parliament and thus the process of forming a government is long and complicated.1 Israel also has an extreme proportional system of government, 1 For more information see Melanie Carina Schmoll, “Israel and the permanent siege: The people have spoken - who will find an answer to the needs of the voters?” Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 20, 1 (2019).
    [Show full text]
  • The New Israeli Government: Background and Prospects
    Situation Assessement | 14 June 2021 The New Israeli Government: Background and Prospects Unit for Political Studies The hee Isrhele Gohsrnhrnte rackgrornd ane Prospect Series: Situation Assessement 14 June 2021 Unit for Political Studies TheUnit for Political Studies is thheCenter’s department dedicated to the study of the region’s most pressing current rffairs.eAn integral and vital part of thheACR S’ activities, it offers academically rigorous analysis on issues that are relevant and useful to the pubela, academics and policy-makers of thheArab region and bhyond. TheUnit for Political Studie draws on the collaborative efforts of a number of scholars based within and outside thheACR S. It produces nhree ofenhheCenter’s publication series: Assessment Report, PolicyeAnalysis, and Case Analysis reports.e.e Copyrighne©e2021eArabeCenter for Research and PolicyeStudies.eAll RlkhnIeReserved.eeeeee TheArabeCenter for Research and PolicyeStudies is an independent research institute and think tank for thhe studyeGfehistory and social sciences, with particular emphasis on the applied social sciences. TheCenter’s paramount concern is the advancement ofeArab societies and states, their cooperation withe one another and issues concerning thheArab nation in general.eTo that end, it seeks to examine and diagnose nhe situation in thheArab world - states and communities- to analyze social, economic and cultural policies and to provide political analysis,efrom an Arab perspective.e TheCenter publishes in botheArabic and English in order to make its work accessible to botheArab and non- Arab researchers.e TheArabeCenter for Research and PolicyeStudies Ae-TarfreStreet,eWrnleAl Banat Ae-Dryrhr,eQatar O Boxe10277,eDGhre +974e4035e4111 www.nGhainstitute.org The hee Isrhele Gohsrnhrnte rackgrornd ane Prospect Series: Situation Assessement Table of Contents 14 June 2021 Background .
    [Show full text]
  • The Jordan Valley Is Waiting for Zionist Action
    The Jordan Valley Is Waiting for Zionist Action by Maj. Gen. (res.) Gershon Hacohen BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 1,291, September 16, 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Beyond its unquestionable vitality for Israel’s security, the Jordan Valley in its full geographical scope can accommodate millions of Israelis and national infrastructure that cannot be compressed into the coastal plain. If PM Netanyahu’s declaration of sovereignty is not immediately borne out by a surge of building and focused governmental support, it will sputter and die. PM Netanyahu’s promise to apply sovereignty to the Jordan Valley is worthy of praise. The reasons for doing so were already evident to PM Levi Eshkol in the immediate wake of the 1967 the Six-Day War, and were fully fleshed out in the Allon Plan. As the plan stated: “The eastern border of the state of Israel must be the Jordan River and a line that crosses the Dead Sea in the middle…. We must add to the country—as an inseparable part of its sovereignty—a strip approximately 10-15 kilometers wide, along the Jordan Valley.” The plan was presented to the government headed by Eshkol, who, with his Mapai mindset, chose to introduce it without putting it to a vote. Typically for those days, the plan moved immediately to the implementation stage, and a settlement infrastructure was built that has existed ever since. In line with the plan, the Allon Road was paved and the Jordan Valley communities were built along Road 90 and the Allon Road. In the Knesset debate on the Oslo Interim Agreement in October 1995, PM Rabin, about a month before his assassination, outlined his position and stated: “The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.” The notion of applying sovereignty to the Jordan Valley has always enjoyed a broad national consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism and Religion -- Take 2
    H-Nationalism Nationalism and Religion -- Take 2 Blog Post published by Yoav Peled on Monday, May 24, 2021 In this post Yoav Peled, Tel Aviv University, discusses the relations between nationalism and religion among Muslims and Jews in Israel. In March 2021 Israel held its fourth general election in two years, which resulted in the same deadlock between Benjamin Netanyahu’s populist supporters and his opponents as the previous three campaigns. (This is not an issue of left and right, as the anti-Netanyahu bloc includes several right- wing parties.) Right before the elections, the United Arab List (UAL), an Islamist political party which represents one of two affiliates of the Muslim Brotherhood in Israel (the other affiliate has been outlawed), split from the United List, a coalition of four Arab political parties espousing different shades of Palestinian nationalism. Upon leaving the United List, UAL’s leader, Mansour Abbas, a dentist by profession, declared that his party would be open to negotiate with either side of the political map, including Netanyahu’s bloc, the most nationalist, i.e., anti-Palestinian, political formation in Israel’s history. As it turned out, after the elections Netanyahu and his bloc were short two Knesset seats (out of 120) to form a governing coalition, and the UAL had four seats, which could have carried Netanyahu over the top. However, Religious Zionism, the most right-wing party in Netanyahu’s bloc, which gained six seats, refused to participate in a coalition that would depend on an Arab party, even if that party’s support will be only in the form of abstaining in the crucial vote in the Knesset.1 Religious Zionism Religious Zionism is a tendency within the Zionist movement, established in 1902.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamas Attack on Israel Aims to Capitalize on Palestinian
    Selected articles concerning Israel, published weekly by Suburban Orthodox Toras Chaim’s (Baltimore) Israel Action Committee Edited by Jerry Appelbaum ( [email protected] ) | Founding editor: Sheldon J. Berman Z”L Issue 8 8 7 Volume 2 1 , Number 1 9 Parshias Bamidbar | 48th Day Omer May 1 5 , 2021 Hamas Attack on Israel Aims to Capitalize on Palestinian Frustration By Dov Lieber and Felicia Schwartz wsj.com May 12, 2021 It is not that the police caused the uptick in violence, forces by Monday evening from Shei kh Jarrah. The but they certainly ran headfirst, full - speed, guns forces were there as part of security measures surrounding blazing into the trap that was set for them. the nightly protests. When the secretive military chief of the Palestinian As the deadline passed, the group sent the barrage of Islamist movement Hamas emerged from the shadows last rockets toward Jerusalem, precipitating the Israeli week, he chose to weigh in on a land dispute in East response. Jerusalem, threatening to retaliate against Israel if Israeli strikes and Hamas rocket fire have k illed 56 Palestinian residents there were evicted from their homes. Palestinians, including 14 children, and seven Israelis, “If the aggression against our people…doesn’ t stop including one child, according to Palestinian and Israeli immediately,” warned the commander, Mohammad Deif, officials. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel “the enemy will pay an expensive price.” has killed dozens of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad Hamas followed through on the threat, firing from the operatives. Gaza Strip, which it governs, over a thousand rockets at Althou gh the Palestinian youth have lacked a single Israel since Monday evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Activism and Conservatism During the Intifadas Murat ÜLGÜL* Abstract Introduction
    Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas Murat ÜLGÜL* Abstract Introduction Are soldiers more prone and likely to use force Are soldiers more prone to use force and initiate conflicts than civilians? To bring a and initiate conflicts than civilians? new insight to this question, this article compares The traditional view in the civil- the main arguments of military activism and military relations literature stresses that military conservatism theories on Israeli policies during the First and Second Intifadas. Military professional soldiers are conservative activism argues that soldiers are prone to end in the use of force because soldiers political problems with the use of force mainly are the ones who mainly suffer in war. because of personal and organizational interests Instead, this view says, it is the civilians as well as the effects of a military-mindset. The proponents of military conservatism, on the who initiate wars and conflicts because, other hand, claim that soldiers are conservative without military knowledge, they on the use of force and it is the civilians most underestimate the costs of war while likely offering military measures. Through an overvaluing the benefits of military analysis of qualitative nature, the article finds 1 action. In recent decades, military that soldiers were more conservative in the use of force during the First Intifadas and Oslo conservatism has been challenged by Peace Process while they were more hawkish in a group of scholars who argue that the the Second Intifada. This difference is explained traditional view is based on a limited by enemy conceptions and by the politicization number of cases, mainly civil-military of Israeli officers.
    [Show full text]
  • An Idiot's Guide to the Nation-‐State Controversy
    An idiot’s guide to the nation-state controversy A bird’s-eye view of the facts, arguments and motivations behind the proposed legislation that is roiling Israeli politics The Times of Israel By Haviv Rettig Gur December 1, 2014 So much has been written about the nation-state bills, and so much of it has been wrong on the basic facts, that a straightforward primer on the existing versions and a brief sketch of the arguments around them may provide readers with basic tools to grapple with the issue. A government-sponsored bill is currently being written at the direction of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and under the supervision of Attorney General Yehudah Weinstein. Contrary to reports in both Israeli and foreign media, from a New York Times editorial to the world’s largest wire services, the cabinet did not pass a nation-state bill two weeks ago. Rather, it passed a 13-page decision that committed the government to supporting two right-wing versions of the nation-state bill in a preliminary vote in the Knesset, “but only,” the cabinet decision reads, “on condition that the proponents [of the two bills] agree that their bills will be attached [Israeli legislative terminology for ‘subsumed’] in a government-sponsored bill that will be proposed by the prime minister on the matter, which will be drafted on the basis of the principles contained in the appendix to this decision, and which will be adapted to it [the government bill].” Much of what has been said about the nation-state bill — that it “narrows” Israel’s democracy, that it changes the formal legal standing of Israel’s minorities — referred to the right-wing bills superseded by the government decision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bennett-Lapid ‘Change Government’
    BICOM Briefing The Bennett-Lapid ‘Change Government’ June 2021 The Bennett-Lapid ‘Change Government’ On Wednesday evening, 2 June, Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid informed President Rivlin that he had succeeded in forming a coalition government, adding that it would “work for all the citizens of Israel, those that voted for it and those that didn’t. It will do everything to unite Israeli society”. Swearing the new government into office, which only requires only a relative majority, will take place within the next 11 days. Yamina’s Naftali Bennett will serve as Prime Minister for the first two years, followed by Lapid. Maariv 1 June, Bennett and Lapid stare lovingly at eachother as the sun – with the face of Netan- yahu sets The Change Government How did we get here? The elections for the 24th Knesset which took place on 23 March 2021 gave neither the pro-Netanyahu bloc nor the anti-Netanyahu bloc a clear majority of 61 seats. Following the results, two parties who defined themselves as unaligned were considered to be key to both sides - Naftali Bennett of Yamina (7 seats) and Mansour Abbas of Raam (4 seats). Bennett emphasised his preference for a right-wing and ultra- Orthodox coalition. When Likud sources sent out feelers to Raam to support the government from outside 2 the coalition, that move was opposed by Bezalel Smotrich and his Religious Zionist party. With Saar unwilling to sit with Netanyahu, and Smotrich unwilling to countenance outside support from Raam, the pro-Netanyahu right-wing/ultra-Orthodox coalition could only muster 59 seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and the Middle East News Update
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Friday, January 17 Headlines: • Final Hurdle Preventing Immunity Removal Likely Next Week • Polls Show Right-Left Still Deadlocked • Blue and White Appealing to Religious Zionists in Wake of Rupture • Ben Gvir to PM: I’m Not Dropping Out, Don’t Preach to Me • World Leaders to Meet in Jerusalem, Send Message Against anti-Semitism • Putin Said Mulling Pardon for Israeli Jailed in Russia Commentary: • Yedioth Ahronoth: “The Immunity Battle” − By Nachum Barnea • Ha’aretz: “Religious Zionist Politics Has Never Looked So Miserable” − Yossi Verter S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 The Hon. Robert Wexler, President ● Yoni Komorov, Editor ● Yehuda Greenfield-Gilat, Associate Editor News Excerpts January 17, 2020 Jerusalem Post Final Hurdle Preventing Immunity Removal Likely Next Week Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein is expected at the beginning of next week to announce a date for the Knesset plenum to convene to pass the final proposal necessary to ensure that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's immunity will be removed. There is a majority for removing Netanyahu's immunity in the Knesset plenum and there will also be in the House Committee that will legislate the rejection of his request for immunity from prosecution in his criminal cases. The House Committee will vote to reject Netanyahu's immunity after some three weeks of deliberations. After the vote to reject immunity, Netanyahu’s indictment will be filed at the Jerusalem District Court but will not begin for several months. Once the indictment is filed, Netanyahu will not be able to request immunity from the next Knesset.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download As A
    THE PEOPLE AND THE LAND ISRAEL ELECTIONS Gil Hoffman Israel’s Quest for Stability he happy ending of the Purim on his leadership, in which he faces four elections, Trump took steps that helped story is that instead of the disadvantages he did not have in the Netanyahu politically. wicked Haman, King Achash- previous three. Despite these disadvantages, Netanyahu verosh’s new viceroy was Mordechai T 1. He lost part of his political bloc when also has three new advantages: HaYehudi. he left the right-wing Yamina Party 1. But even then, after Haman and his out of his current governing coalition. He can celebrate his peace agree- sons are dead and the Jews are no longer Yamina leader Naftali Bennett now says ments with Bahrain, Morocco, Sudan at risk, the last verse of the Megillah he is running against him for prime and the United Arab Emirates. The recounts how Mordechai still did not minister. agreements reinforce the Likud’s mes- please everyone: sage that Netanyahu is by far Israel’s That leaves Netanyahu’s bloc with only most experienced and worldly leader. “For Mordecai the Jew was viceroy to his own Likud, Haredi parties and the King Achashverosh, and great among Religious Zionist Party, which may not 2. His success in making Israel the the Jews and accepted by most of his cross the 3.25% electoral threshold. “Vaccination Nation.” The Jewish State brethren, seeking the good of his people Unless those parties obtain a majority has vaccinated a much higher percent- and interceding for the welfare of all of the Knesset’s 120 seats, Netanyahu age of its people than any other country, his kindred.” would need the support of the angry helping ease the health and economic Bennett to form another government.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Do-Over Election
    Your Shabbat source of Israeli News– September 6th 2019 Israel’s Do -over Election: A Guide to All the Parties Israeli politics has been reshaped by new alliances after the entire political firmament learned a harsh lesson from the April election just five months earlier: Unity among ideological allies is crucial. Smaller parties flying solo learned the hard way that independence meant risk falling below the electoral threshold and not making it into the Knesset. By doing so, they not only hurt themselves but mortally wound their entire political camp by “wasting” votes that could help them build a bloc large enough to construct a government. With only nine parties seemingly in a position to cross the electoral threshold, the next Knesset is set to feature the fewest number of parties in Israel’s history. Here are the main contenders: • Likud: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu - fighting a second re-election campaign under the shadow of pending corruption indictments, moved early to reinforce Likud by merging it with Finance Minister Moshe Kahlon’s party giving himself one less party to wrestle with in governing coalition negotiations. Later in the race, he convinced Moshe Feiglin, leader of the far-right Zehut party, to pull out of the elections in order to give larger right-wing parties the precious votes he was taking. In exchange, Feiglin was promised a ministry in a future Likud-led government. • Kahol Lavan: The largest of the multi-party players in the race, Kahol Lavan has continued with its four man alliance formed ahead of the April election.
    [Show full text]
  • February 26 2020 Netanyahu and Gantz Have Reversed Their Roles
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Wednesday, February 26 Headlines: • Israel Form Agency to Prepare for Violence if Settlements Are Annexed • Ex-Mossad Chief: Threat from Gaza Worse Now Than During 2014 War • UN Calls for Two State Solution to be Respected in Middle East • Netanyahu, Ashkenazi Accuse Each Other of Lying, Getting Personal • Netanyahu Associate Hires Intel Firm to Dig Up Dirt on Gantz • 2020 Candidates Debate Reversing Relocation of U.S. Embassy in Israel • Pence, Pompeo to Speak at AIPAC Policy Conference • Egypt Declares Three Days of Mourning for Mubarak Commentary: • Ha’aretz: “These 50,000 Israelis Can Send Netanyahu Packing Next Week” - By Anshel Pfeffer, commentator at Ha’aretz • Yedioth Ahronoth: “Netanyahu and Gantz have Reversed Their Roles” - By Yuval Karny, commentator at Yedioth Ahronoth S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor News Excerpts February 26, 2020 Ha’aretz Israel Form Agency to Prepare for Violence if Settlements Are Annexed The defense establishment has begun preparing for escalating civil and military unrest should the state impose Israeli sovereignty over West Bank settlements in the wake of next week's election. The Israel Defense Forces, the Israel Police, the Shin Bet security service and other defense agencies, together with representatives from government ministries, have begun to establish a joint body to coordinate a unified response in the event of a major outbreak of violence in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and other fronts. The scenarios the body is preparing for include major terror attacks in the West Bank and inside Israel; Palestinians breaking into West Bank settlements.
    [Show full text]