Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329 Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 4

1 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Theodore B. Olson, SBN 38137 2 [email protected] Matthew D. McGill, pro hac vice 3 Amir C. Tayrani, SBN 229609 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 4 Telephone: (202) 955-8668, Facsimile: (202) 467-0539

5 Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., SBN 132009 [email protected] 6 Christopher D. Dusseault, SBN 177557 Ethan D. Dettmer, SBN 196046 7 Sarah E. Piepmeier, SBN 227094 Theane Evangelis Kapur, SBN 243570 8 Enrique A. Monagas, SBN 239087 333 S. Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90071 9 Telephone: (213) 229-7804, Facsimile: (213) 229-7520

10 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies, pro hac vice 11 [email protected] 333 Main Street, Armonk, New York 10504 12 Telephone: (914) 749-8200, Facsimile: (914) 749-8300

13 Jeremy M. Goldman, SBN 218888 [email protected] 14 Theodore H. Uno, SBN 248603 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900, Oakland, California 94612 15 Telephone: (510) 874-1000, Facsimile: (510) 874-1460

16 Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, 17 PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO

18 DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20 KRISTIN M. PERRY, et al., CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW

21 Plaintiffs, and DECLARATION OF KAIPONANEA T. 22 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, MATSUMURA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO 23 Plaintiff-Intervenor, PROPOSED INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO v. INTERVENE 24 , et al., 25 Defendants, 26 and PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS 27 DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al., 28 Defendant-Intervenors.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 09-CV-2292 VRW DECLARATION OF KAIPONANEA T. MATSUMURA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO INTERVENE

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329 Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 4

1 I, Kaiponanea T. Matsumura, declare as follows: 2 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California and in the Northern 3 District of California. I am an associate in the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, counsel of 4 record for Plaintiffs Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo in the 5 above-captioned matter. I make this declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Proposed 6 Intervenors’ Motion to Intervene. The information below is stated on personal knowledge and if 7 called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto. 8 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Linda Deutsch (for the

9 Associated Press), Lawsuit Seeks Federal Ruling on Gay Marriage, S.D. UNION TRIB., May 26, 2009, 10 available at http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/may/26/ca-gay-marriage-federal-052609/. 11 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Lisa Leff (for the

12 Associated Press), Calif. AG, Gov Oppose Suspending Gay Marriage Ban, S.D. UNION TRIB., June

13 12, 2009, available at http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/jun/12/ca-gay-marriage-calif- 14 061209/. 15 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of Maura Dolan & Carol J.

16 Williams, Brown Again Says Prop. 8 Should be Struck Down, L.A. TIMES, June 13, 2009, as retrieved 17 from www.lexis.com. 18 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of News, U.S. District Court 19 Grants Intervenor Status to Prop. 8 Proponents in Case Challenging Law’s Validity (July 1, 2009), 20 available at http://www.protectmarriage.com/article/u-s-district-court-grants-intervenor-status-to- 21 prop-8-proponents-in-case-challenging-law-s-validity. 22 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of Protect Marriage, 23 Endorsements, recovered by the Internet Archive Way Back Machine, available at 24 http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements. 25 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of Schubert Flint’s Responses 26 and Objections to Plaintiffs’ Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit 27 Inspection of Premises, dated October 7, 2009, and signed by Robert H. Tyler and Jennifer L. Monk, 28 Advocates for Faith and Freedom.

2 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 09-CV-2292 VRW DECLARATION OF KAIPONANEA T. MATSUMURA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO INTERVENE

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329 Filed12/30/09 Page3 of 4

1 I declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States, that these facts 2 are true and correct and that this Declaration is executed this 30th day of December, 2009, at San 3 Francisco, California. 4

5 /s/ Kaiponanea T. Matsumura Kaiponanea T. Matsumura 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

3 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 09-CV-2292 VRW DECLARATION OF KAIPONANEA T. MATSUMURA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO INTERVENE

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329 Filed12/30/09 Page4 of 4

1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 2 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California, I attest that 3 concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories to this 4 document.

5 /s/ Theodore B. Olson Theodore B. Olson 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

4 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 09-CV-2292 VRW DECLARATION OF KAIPONANEA T. MATSUMURA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO INTERVENE Case3:09-cv-02292-JW Document329-1 Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 4

EExxhhiibbiitt AA

Lawsuit seeks federal ruling on gay marriage - California - SignOnSanDiego.com Page 1 of 3 Case3:09-cv-02292-JW Document329-1 Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 4

U-T SUBSCRIBER TOOLS SUBSCRIBE TO THE PAPER SUBSCRIBE TO THE E-EDITION

NEWS

NEWS SPORTS BUSINESS LIFESTYLE ENTERTAINMENT THINGS TO DO TRAVEL MYTOWN CLASSIFIEDS REAL ESTATE JOBS AUTOTRADER.COM

TRAFFIC HOT TOPICS: TIGER WOODS HEALTH CARE REFORM WEATHER 63° F SEARCH...

SUBSCRIBE THINGS TO DO +ADD AN EVENT California EVENTS MOVIES RESTAURANTS

LOCAL NEWS NEWS BY REGION NEWS BY TOPIC 20 21 22 23 24 All Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu events

9 pm Tuesday Comedy Night With Mal Hall 8 am Saturday Free Day of Dance 3 pm Saturday Fables, Friends & Fruitcake!

Lawsuit seeks federal ruling on gay marriage WHAT WHEN BY LINDA DEUTSCH, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Search TUESDAY, MAY 26, 2009 AT 5:58 P.M. ALL EVENTS | HOT TICKETS | +ADD AN EVENT LOS ANGELES — Two of the nation's top litigators who opposed each other in the Bush v. Gore election challenge in 2000 have joined forces to seek federal court intervention in California's gay marriage controversy.

Theodore B. Olson and David Boies, long identified as opposing forces for conservative and liberal groups, filed suit in federal court on behalf of two gay men and two gay women, arguing that a California constitutional amendment eliminating the right of gay couples to marry violates the U.S. constitutional guarantees of equal protection and due process.

Olson said he hopes the case will wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

"This is a federal question," Olson said in a telephone interview Tuesday. "This is about the rights of individuals to be treated equally and not be stigmatized."

He said that he and Boies, who have become close friends in the years since Bush v. Gore, decided to collaborate on the issue.

"We wanted to be a symbol of the fact that this not a conservative or a liberal issue. We want to send a signal that this is an important constitutional issue involving equal rights for all Americans," Olson said.

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco on Friday, before the California Supreme Court issued a ruling Tuesday upholding the state's voter-approved Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage.

The suit argues that Proposition 8 creates a category of "second-class citizens" in violation of the U.S. MOST POPULAR MOST COMMENTS Constitution. It seeks a preliminary injunction against imposition of the amendment until the lawsuit is resolved, immediately reinstating marriage rights to same-sex couples. Roof fire closes popular eatery - Metro

The lawsuit names six California officials as defendants including Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney Family fighting murder conviction - Legal Affairs General Edmund G. Brown Jr. It cites numerous precedents including the 1967 case of Loving v. Virginia which struck down bans on interracial marriage. It cites language in that decision which holds that "marriage is one of Man found dead in crashed pickup truck - Local Breaking the basic civil rights of man, fundamental to our very existence and survival." News The lawyers said that by relegating same-sex unions to "the separate-but-unequal institution of domestic partnership," California is violating the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which guarantees equal One stabbed after road-rage incident - Local Breaking protection for all. News

They cite numerous alleged violations of the federal amendment including singling out gays and lesbians for a No eviction for home-renovating family - Metro disfavored legal status and discriminating on the basis of gender and sexual orientation.

"We believe this is the kind of matter where Americans must come together and recognize the rights of all citizens," Olson said.

The lawyers filed their challenge on Friday after the California Supreme Court announced it would be deciding the issue on Tuesday. The suit is not an appeal of Tuesday's state high court decision but rather a challenge of the Proposition 8 constitutional amendment. It was assumed that federal courts would be waiting for the California decision before deciding whether to enter the fray. The lawyers hoped that filing early would give them priority to enter the federal courts.

Olson said that no matter how the case is decided in the district court, one side or the other would likely appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal. A decision there could be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, setting up the ultimate legal contest.

Olson, a former U.S. solicitor general, has argued 55 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. He has prevailed in over 75 percent of those arguments. He has served in high level positions at the U.S. Department of Justice in the Reagan and George W. Bush administrations.

In addition to the Bush v. Gore case, Boise has made headlines for other cases, including his successful defense of NASCAR against antitrust charges. He collected a record $4 billion for American Express in its litigation against Visa and MasterCard in 2008.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/may/26/ca-gay-marriage-federal-052609/ 12/20/2009 Lawsuit seeks federal ruling on gay marriage - California - SignOnSanDiego.com Page 2 of 3 Case3:09-cv-02292-JW Document329-1 Filed12/30/09 Page3 of 4

FOLLOW US

Sponsored Listing

Acai Berry … EXPOSED Health Reporter Discovers the Shocking Truth About Acai Berry. News7Daily.tv

DON’T Pay for White Teeth Learn the Trick Discovered by a Mom to Turn Yellow Teeth White for Under $5! www.TheConsumerWeekly.com

Spinal Stenosis Treatment Our Minimally Invasive Procedure Can Diagnose & Treat Stenosis! www.NorthAmericanSpine.com

Buy a link here

SIGNON TOOLS

Weather SignOn Guides Traffic Coupons Surf Sudoku Gas Prices Crossword Lottery Horoscope Contests Email Alerts Forums Text Alerts Webcams

UNION-TRIBUNE TOOLS

Your Subscription E-Edition Subscribe Archives Newspaper Ads Buy U-T Photos Vacation Stop Special Sections Newspaper in Education

The plaintiffs in the new lawsuit are Kris Perry and Sandy Stier, a lesbian couple from Berkeley who have been together for nine years and are parents of four boys, and Paul Katami and Jeff Zarillo, a gay couple from Burbank who have been together for eight years. Both couples want the right to get married.

Sponsored Listing

Now Hiring: Make $63/hr Part-Time $63/hr part-time jobs open. Requirements: Just a computer InternetJobNews.net

Buy a link here

Commenting Terms of Use

Add New Comment

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/may/26/ca-gay-marriage-federal-052609/ 12/20/2009 Lawsuit seeks federal ruling on gay marriage - California - SignOnSanDiego.com Page 3 of 3 Case3:09-cv-02292-JW Document329-1 Filed12/30/09 Page4 of 4

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/may/26/ca-gay-marriage-federal-052609/ 12/20/2009 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-2 Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 4

EExxhhiibbiitt BB

Calif AG, gov oppose suspending gay marriage ban - California - SignOnSanDiego.com Page 1 of 3 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-2 Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 4

U-T SUBSCRIBER TOOLS SUBSCRIBE TO THE PAPER SUBSCRIBE TO THE E-EDITION

Sponsored Internet Marketing Certificate Master Internet Marketing Now! NEWS Learn eCommerce, SEO, SEM, Media & More. 100% Online Courses! Learn more

NEWS SPORTS BUSINESS LIFESTYLE ENTERTAINMENT THINGS TO DO TRAVEL MYTOWN CLASSIFIEDS REAL ESTATE JOBS AUTOTRADER.COM

TRAFFIC WEATHER 55° F TOP STORY: TOLL-ROAD WAR ISN’T OVER SEARCH...

SUBSCRIBE THINGS TO DO +ADD AN EVENT California EVENTS MOVIES RESTAURANTS

18 19 20 21 22 All LOCAL NEWS NEWS BY REGION NEWS BY TOPIC Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue events

2 pm tomorrow Holiday Pops 2:30 pm tomorrow California Ballet's "The Nutcracker"… 7:30 pm tomorrow Lady Gaga

Calif AG, gov oppose suspending gay marriage ban WHAT WHEN BY LISA LEFF, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Search FRIDAY, JUNE 12, 2009 AT 8:47 P.M. ALL EVENTS | HOT TICKETS | +ADD AN EVENT SAN FRANCISCO — California Attorney General Jerry Brown and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger are opposing an effort to lift the state's ban on same-sex marriage while a lawsuit challenging Proposition 8 makes it way through the federal courts.

Brown and a private lawyer for Schwarzenegger wrote in papers filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco late Thursday that allowing same-sex couples to resume marrying now would create too much uncertainty.

Suspending the ban "would not serve the public interest because it would create significant uncertainty for many persons concerning a relationship in which certainty is of the utmost importance," Brown said. "At this stage of the litigation, these concerns must override the countervailing arguments presented by plaintiffs."

But the attorney general, in a follow-up brief filed Friday evening said he supports the aims of the lawsuit. Brown said he agrees that Proposition 8 "imposed a special disability on gays and lesbians and their families on the basis of sexual orientation," violating the U.S. Constitution's promise of equal protection and due process.

"Taking from same-sex couples the right to civil marriage that they had previously possessed under California's Constitution cannot be squared with guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment," Brown said. "Accordingly, the Attorney General answers the Complaint consistent with his duty to uphold the United States Constitution."

On May 26, the California Supreme Court upheld the voter-approved same-sex marriage ban, which as a constitutional amendment trumped the court's decision from a year earlier striking down a pair of laws that limited marriage to a man and a woman. MOST POPULAR MOST COMMENTS Schwarzenegger has not taken a position yet on the validity of the federal challenge to Proposition 8. As a defendant in the case, he has until the end of Tuesday to submit a response. Three from Bird Rock Bandit case rearrested - Local Breaking News "Today's filing by Attorney General Jerry Brown underscores that Proposition 8 is a clear violation of the United States Constitution because it denies all people equal rights," said Chad Griffin, president of the American Ochocinco calls out Merriman - Sports Foundation for Equal Rights, the organization behind the federal lawsuit. "We are confident that our state's chief legal officer's strong opinion will help this case move quickly through the courts so that every Californian will Girl pleads guilty in mom's slaying - Metro soon be treated equally under the law."

Protect Marriage, the group that sponsored Proposition 8, has asked a federal judge in San Francisco for Man dies after being hit by trolley in Barrio Logan - Local permission to intervene in the case. Andy Pugno, the organization's lawyer, said he was not surprised by Breaking News Brown's move. Costly kick in the teeth to bowl teams - Sports During the challenge to Proposition 8 that was handled by the state Supreme Court this year, Brown, a Democrat considering running for governor next year, surprised many people by refusing to defend the measure. Schwarzenegger did not take a formal position in that case.

"It's still disappointing that (Brown) would continue to target Prop. 8 even after the California courts said it was valid," Pugno said.

The federal case was filed on behalf of two unmarried gay couples last month by Theodore Olson and David Boies, the lawyers who represented opposing sides in the contested 2000 presidential election. Griffin, a Los Angeles-based political strategist, approached Olson about taking on the case and has recruited director Rob Reiner, producer Bruce Cohen and screenwriter Dustin Lance Black as board members.

A hearing on their request for a temporary injunction that would prevent the state from enforcing Proposition 8 is scheduled for July 2. If a judge grants the request, gay couples could have years to avail themselves of the right to wed before the case gets settled.

Theodore Boutrous Jr., a member of the legal team in the case, said he disagreed with Brown and the governor that lifting the ban when it could be reimposed later would create too much confusion. He noted that that in upholding Proposition 8, the state Supreme Court allowed to let stand the marriages of an estimated 18,000

gay couples who tied the knot before the measure passed.

"The resolution of that issue was quite simple. The government held that those people can continue to be id"B t id"If f l t t t i d d li i t bl h lti hiI

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/jun/12/ca-gay-marriage-calif-061209/ 12/18/2009 Calif AG, gov oppose suspending gay marriage ban - California - SignOnSanDiego.com Page 2 of 3 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-2 Filed12/30/09 Page3 of 4

FOLLOW US

Sponsored Listing

SHOCKING Acai Investigation We Investigate Acai Berry. Is Acai a Miracle Diet or Internet Scam? www.HealthNews18.net

Stay At Home Mom Makes $$$ Online Are Online Jobs The Next Big Thing? For Mary Steadman It Sure Is. InternetJobNews.net

2 Rules To Flat Stomach Mom Loses Her Body Fat By Following These 2 Simple Rules. News11Online.info

Buy a link here

SIGNON TOOLS

Weather SignOn Guides Traffic Coupons Surf Sudoku Gas Prices Crossword Lottery Horoscope Contests Email Alerts Forums Text Alerts Webcams

UNION-TRIBUNE TOOLS

Your Subscription E-Edition Subscribe Archives Newspaper Ads Buy U-T Photos Vacation Stop Special Sections Newspaper in Education

don't see any problems with that at all."

Geoffrey Kors, executive director of Equality California, the state's largest gay rights group, said that while he wished Schwarzenegger and Brown supported the injunction, it was more important for them to support the ultimate purpose of the lawsuit.

"We hope the governor shows some leadership instead of doing nothing, having no position at all on an issue of extreme importance in California," Kors said.

Sponsored Listing

2 Rules To Flat Stomach Mom Loses Her Body Fat By Following These 2 Simple Rules. News11Online.info

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/jun/12/ca-gay-marriage-calif-061209/ 12/18/2009 Calif AG, gov oppose suspending gay marriage ban - California - SignOnSanDiego.com Page 3 of 3 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-2 Filed12/30/09 Page4 of 4

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/jun/12/ca-gay-marriage-calif-061209/ 12/18/2009 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-3 Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 4

EExxhhiibbiitt CC

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-3 Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 4 Page 1

Copyright 2009 Los Angeles Times All Rights Reserved Los Angeles Times

June 13, 2009 Saturday Home Edition

SECTION: MAIN NEWS; Metro Desk; Part A; Pg. 13

LENGTH: 923 words

HEADLINE: CALIFORNIA; Brown again says Prop. 8 should be struck down; In his response to a federal lawsuit, he maintains the ballot measure violates the U.S. Constitution.

BYLINE: Maura Dolan and Carol J. Williams

BODY: California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown once again refused to defend Proposition 8's ban on same-sex marriage Friday, telling a federal judge that it violated the U.S. Constitution and should be struck down. Brown made his arguments in response to a federal lawsuit against the state by two gay couples who contend the initiative violates federal due process and equal protection guarantees. Over Brown's opposition, the California Supreme Court upheld the proposition last month on state, not federal, constitutional grounds, a few days after the federal suit was filed in San Francisco. Brown's willingness to fight a state law that has been upheld by the state's highest court contrasted sharply with President Obama's decision this week to oppose a federal challenge to the U.S. Defense of Marriage Act brought in Orange County. In that case, a married gay couple, Arthur Smelt and Christopher Hammer, has challenged the constitutionality of both Proposition 8 and the 1996 federal law that prohibits extension of federal benefits to same-sex couples. The U.S. Justice Department has argued that the Orange County challenge should be dismissed, a position that was quickly denounced by gay rights law- yers. In a statement, Obama's lawyers noted that the president considers the gay marriage ban discriminatory and wants it rescinded, but that his government is legally obliged to defend the law on the books. "The president has said he wants to see a legislative repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act because it prevents [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] couples from being granted equal rights and benefits. However, until Congress Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-3 Filed12/30/09 Page3 of 4

passes legislation repealing the law, the administration will continue to defend the statute when it is challenged in the justice system," the statement said. Brown, however, said that even though California is required to enforce Proposition 8, he is free to agree with the challengers that it violates the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Brown's position, laid out in a brief filed late Friday, puts the state's highest-ranking law enforcement officer on the record declaring that the ballot measure violates federal constitutional protections. The San Francisco case may eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court. At the same time, Brown argued that U.S. District Judge Vaughan Walker should not suspend Proposition 8 immediately because a higher court could reinstate it later and put same-sex couples in "legal limbo." "Staying operation of Proposition 8, without the certainty of a final judg- ment as to its constitutionality, would leave same-sex couples, as well as their families, friends, and the wider community, in legal limbo," Brown argued. Andy Pugno, the lawyer for the campaign that won passage of the measure, ac- cused Brown of being "intent on undercutting Prop. 8 at every opportunity" when told of the filing. "The people of California really deserve better than to have their vote just continually questioned and second-guessed by the attorney general," Pugno said. The campaign has asked Judge Walker to allow it to defend the measure as a full participant in the case, just as it did before the California Supreme Court. Nationally renowned attorneys Theodore Olson and David Boies filed the San Francisco suit on behalf of a lesbian couple from Berkeley and two gay men from Burbank who had been denied marriage licenses after Proposition 8's passage. The lawyers are scheduled to ask Walker on July 2 to put Proposition 8 on hold pending a trial. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, in a separate filing, also said the measure should not be temporarily blocked because of the uncertainty over what higher courts will rule. The federal challenge brought by Olson and Boies has worried gay rights advo- cates who fear the federal courts, currently dominated by judges named by Repub- lican presidents, could rule against those claiming a constitutional right for gays to marry and set back their cause by as much as decades. The American Civil Liberties Union, speaking for an alliance of gay rights groups, lamented the Justice Department's move to dismiss the Orange County cou- ple's suit. "The administration is using many of the same flawed legal arguments that the Bush administration used," Paul Cates, the ACLU gay rights project director, said of the brief filed by the government late Thursday. "These arguments rightly have been rejected by several state supreme courts as legally unsound and obviously discriminatory." The federal ban on recognizing same-sex marriages is also being challenged by 12 gay couples from Massachusetts who have identified specific damages suffered because of the law, such as denial of joint tax-filing benefits, spousal bene- fits for federal employees and inheritance rights. Smelt and Hammer also sued the state over Proposition 8. In response to that challenge, Brown filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the men lack standing Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-3 Filed12/30/09 Page4 of 4

to sue because their marriage has been recognized as legal and is unaffected by the voter initiative. In upholding Proposition 8, the state high court refused to apply it retroac- tively, leaving an estimated 18,000 same-sex marriages intact. Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment, reinstated a same-sex marriage ban following the California Supreme Court's historic, May 15, 2008, ruling that the ban violated the state Constitution. The state high court rejected challenges that the measure was an impermissi- ble, sweeping revision rather than a more limited constitutional amendment. -- [email protected] [email protected]

LOAD-DATE: June 13, 2009

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-4 Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 2

EExxhhiibbiitt DD

Protect Marriage - Yes on 8 » News Page 1 of 1 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-4 Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 2

Not receiving ProtectMarriage.com emails? Sign Up!

News

U.S. District Court Grants Intervenor Status to Prop. 8 Proponents in Case Challenging Law's Validity

July 01, 2009 Contact: Cherri Spriggs-Hernandez, 916-448-4234 SACRAMENTO, Calif. – The official proponents of Proposition 8, last November’s successful initiative to restore marriage as being between a man and a woman in the California Constitution, were granted intervenor status by the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California in a lawsuit that challenges the constitutionality of Prop. 8.

“As the official proponents and campaign committee for Proposition 8, we are pleased that the court will allow us to defend marriage and the will of the people against challenges to the voter-approved measure,” said Andy Pugno, general counsel for ProtectMarriage.com.

“As we have seen in other legal challenges against the right of the people to protect traditional marriage in California’s laws, particularly the recent California "We are at one of those moments. This is THE major change point of Supreme Court decision to uphold Prop. 8, today’s ruling designating us to the last few decades..." defend Prop. 8 reflects the unfortunate fact that, if left up to state officials, the will of the people would not be defended at all,” he added.

The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit, Perry v Schwarzenegger in May, challenging Prop. 8 on the basis that it violates the United States Constitution. They subsequently filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, which would suspend Prop. 8 and 100,490 allow same-sex couples to resume obtaining marriage licenses while Perry v Schwarzenegger wound its way through the court system. A hearing on whether to issue the preliminary injunction is scheduled for July 2, 2009. In the ruling granting intervenor status to the official Proposition 8 proponents, the Court took notice of the fact that the California Attorney General was not defending the state’s laws as contemplated in the California Constitution.

“Marriage between a man and a woman predates government, is recognized as the foundation of the family, and has been twice reaffirmed in a statewide vote as the will of the people in California,” said Pugno. “We look forward to helping safeguard what the voters have put in place as this lawsuit moves forward.”

### Back to News

Home Prop. 8 Blog News & Media Take Action Endorsements Events Contact Us Donate Now

© 2008 ProtectMarriage.com. All Rights Reserved. ProtectMarriage.com is a project of California Renewal (I.D. #1302592) | Privacy Policy

http://www.protectmarriage.com/article/u-s-district-court-grants-intervenor-status-to-prop... 12/18/2009 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 44

EExxhhiibbiitt EE

Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 1 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 44

 Home  About Us  The Amendment  News  Volunteer  Endorsements  Resources  Donate Endorsements

Endorse Us Today!

Organizations

Advocates for Faith and Freedom Agudath Israel of California Alliance Defense Fund, serving as Legal Counsel American Family Association Americas Hope Armineh Chelebian for State Assembly 40th AD Association of Christian Schools International, Northern and Southern Districts of CA Bakersfield Republican Assembly Bethel Baptist Academy Brethren in Christ Church Pacific Conference Brigham Young University California Catholic Conference of Bishops California Catholic Women’s Forum California Family Alliance California Family Council Capitol Resource Institute Catholics at Work Catholics for Protectmarriage.com Catholics for the Common Good Center for Reclaiming America CFFC-LA Seasoned Sisters Bill and Pam Farrel Marriage and Family Communicators National Organization for Marriage FHR Christian Citizenship Council of San Diego Christian Educators Association International Christian Examiner Newspaper Concerned Women for America Confraternidad Hispaña Bautista de California (Hispanic Southern Baptist Fellowship) Coral Ridge Ministries

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 2 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page3 of 44

Creation Research of North America Creation Research of the North Coast Dobbins/Oregon House Action Committee Duncan Hunter for 52nd Congressional District Eagle Forum of California Eagle Forum of Sacramento El Camino Christian Fellowship ElectionForum.org Faith2Action Faith 316 Family Leader Network Family Research Council Focus on the Family Holistic Integrated Services Foundation (HIS), Fullerton Home Fellowship Home Instead Senior Care - Fresno & Modesto Ignite Youth/New Wine Church Institute for Families and Taxpayers Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc. Knights of Columbus St. Elizabeth Council #8747, Milpitas Knights of Columbus St. Michael's of Marin Council #10530, Novato Knights of Columbus St. Raphael Council #1292, San Rafael Koinonia Sports & Fitness Assoc. Legacy Law Foundation Liberty Counsel Life After Foster Care Meridian Magazine Organized Business Council Pacific Justice Institute Pastors Rapid Response Team (Pastors in Coalition with ProtectMarriage.com) Preserve Liberty Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund Public Awareness Ministries Sacramento District Church of the Nazarene Sonoma County Republican Party Southbay Crossing St. Mary's Charismatic Prayer Group The Center for Teaching the Constitution The Holy Name Society The Knights of Columbus, Council 1346, San Mateo, CA The Western Center for Law & Policy Traditional Family Coalition Traditional Values Coalition Trinity Life Solutions NorthBay Neonatology Associates, Inc. Families First Counseling Services Ebmeyer Charter & Tour Superior Organizing Services Ventura County Christian Leadership Council Come Let Us Reason Environmental Geology Services

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 3 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page4 of 44

54th AD Republican Central Committee United Families California Values Advocacy Council VOCAL Californians for the Preservation of Family & Marriage Wycliffe Bible Translators, Temecula

Public Officials

State Senators

Senator Dick Ackerman (R-Tustin) Senator Sam Aanestad (R-Redding) Senator Roy Ashburn (R-Bakersfield ) Senator James Battin, Jr. (R-La Quinta) Senator Dave Cogdill (R-Modesto) Senator Dave Cox (R-Fair Oaks) Senator Jeff Denham (R-Merced) Senator Bob Dutton (R-San Bernardino) Senator Tom Harman (R-Huntington Beach) Senator Dennis Hollingsworth (R- El Cajon) Senator Abel Maldonado (R-Santa Maria) Senator Bob Margett (R-Arcadia) Senator Tom McClintock (R-Thousand Oaks) Senator George Runner (R-Antelope Valley) Senator Mark Wyland (R-Carlsbad)

Assembly Members

Assemblyman Greg Aghzarian (R-Stockton) Assemblyman John Benoit (R-Palm Desert) Assemblyman Chuck Devore (R-Irvine) Assemblyman Bill Emmerson (R-Redlands) Assemblyman Guy Houston (R-San Ramon) Assemblyman Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar) Assemblyman Rick Keene (R-Chico) Assemblyman Doug LaMalfa (R-Biggs) Assemblyman Bill Maze (R-Visalia) Assemblyman Mike Duvall (R-Yorba Linda) Assemblyman Alan Nakanishi (R-Lodi) Assemblyman Roger Niello (R-Sacramento) Assemblyman George Plescia (R-San Diego) Assemblywoman Sharon Runner (R-Lancaster) Assemblywoman Audra Strickland (R-Camarillo) Assemblyman Van Tran (R-Costa Mesa) Assemblyman Michael Villines (R-Clovis) Assemblywoman Mimi Walters (R-Laguna Niguel)

Local Elected Officials

Mayor Neil C. Blais, City of Rancho Santa Margarita

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 4 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page5 of 44

Mayor Eric King, City of Folsom Placer County Supervisor Bruze Kranz (District 5) Imperial County Supervisor Wally Leimgruber (District 5) Linda Lindholm- Laguna Niguel Councilmember Mayor Jeff Miller, City of Corona Mayor Curt Pringle, City of Anaheim Mike Spence, West Covina Unified School Board Member

Other Public Officials

Ken Campbell, Placer County Republican Chairman Former Assemblyman Ray Haynes (R-Murrieta) Former Assemblyman Tim Leslie (R-Roseville)

Churches & Ministries

A. V. Alpha & Omega Ministries, Palmdale Abundant Life Assembly of God, Copeland Abundant Life Christian Fellowship All Seasons Ministries, El Cajon Alpha and Omega Arlington Apostolic Church, Riverside Alpine Anglican Church, Alpine Baldwin Park Church of Christ Bible Fellowship Church, Ventura Bundy Canyon Christian Church and School, Wildomar Calvary Assembly of God Calvary Assembly, Milpitas Calvary Baptist Church, Modesto Calvary Church Calvary Temple Camarillo Community Church Canyon View Church of Christ, San Diego Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament Central Baptist Church of Indio Chapel in the Pines, Arnold Chinese Evangelical Free Church, Monterey Park Chinese Grace Bible Church, Sacramento Christ Driven Church of Fowler Ca. Christian Life Center Christian Life Tools Christian Outreach for Armenians, Glendale Church of Christ, Upland Community Counseling Services, Inc. Core Christian Fellowship, Murrieta Cornerstone Baptist Church Cornerstone Baptist Church, Nicholasville KY Cornerstone Christian Church, El Dorado Hills Cornerstone Fellowship, Livermore CrossPoint Community Church of the Nazarene Dan Kricorian Ministries Int'l

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 5 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page6 of 44

Dayspring Christian Fellowship Desert Stream Ministries El Cajon Wesleyan Church, El Cajon Elsinore Christian Center, Lake Elsinore Faith Chapel Church of God in Christ, San Diego Faith Community Church by the Sea, Encinitas Faith Tabernacle Faith to Faith Fellowship, Temecula F.C.F. Int'l Ministries Filipino American Community Church First Baptist Church of Hesperia First Baptist Church of Menlo Park First Baptist Church of Taft First Baptist Church, Lomita First Foursquare Gospel Church of San Jose, San Jose First Presbyterian Church, Amarillo TX First Southern Baptist, Yucca Valley Foxworthy Baptist Church Free Indeed Christian Fellowship, Perris Freedom Community Christian Church, Perris Freewill Missionary Baptist Church, San Diego Freewill Missionary Baptist Church, San Diego Friends Church, Yorba Linda Friendship Christian Fellowship Church, Moreno Valley Gem of the Valley Church, Murrieta God’s Word Church, Apple Valley Golden Altar Ministries, San Jose Golden Gate Christian Church High Desert Church, Victorville Highland Springs Fellowship, Banning House of Luke, Hemet Independent Church of Lake Elsinore Joy Ministry for Christ, Los Angeles Jubilee Family Church, Oskaloosa IA Koinonia Evangelistic Center, Moreno Valley Lake Murray Church, Assemblies of God Life Center Church, Lakewood Light by the Bay Church, San Lorenzo Lighthouse Assembly of God, Murrieta Lighthouse Community Church, Lathrop Living Faith Christian Fellowship, Garden Grove Living Word Christian Church, San Diego Love and Unity Church of God in Christ, Compton Luke Four Eighteen Ministries International, Temecula Maranatha Chapel Maranatha Chapel, Rancho Bernardo Menlo Park Community Church of God in Christ, Menlo Park Meridian Southern Baptist, El Cajon Mount Pisgah Baptist Church, San Diego Mountain View Community Church, Temecula Napoleon Washington, Jr. Evangelistic Assn.

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 6 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page7 of 44

Nations Harvest Church, Sunnyvale New Birth Kingdom Covenant New Covenant Ministries Christian Fellowship New Day Church New Destiny Christian Church, Inc. New Life Presbyterian Church New Light Church of God, Riverside New Seasons Church Newhall Church of the Nazarene Oasis of Faith Christian Center Our Redeemer Lives Church, Lake Elsinore Progressive M.B.C. of Berkeley Rancho Baptist Church, Temecula Ray of Hope Church, Pomona Resurrection Power Ministries Revival Christian Fellowship, Menifee Rose Drive Friends Church, Yorba Linda Rubidoux First Assembly of God San Antonio Heights Community Church, San Bernardino San Diego Christian Worship Center, San Diego San Jose Church of Christ, San Jose San Jose Foursquare Church, San Jose San Jose Open Bible Church, San Jose San Jose Word of Faith Christian Center, San Jose San Mateo Pro Life Set Free Ministries of San Diego, San Diego Sierra Madre Congregational Church Skyline Wesleyan Church, El Cajon Solid Ground Brethren in Christ Church, Alta Loma South Coast Christian Assembly South Valley Christian Church, San Jose Southwest Christian Church, Temecula Southwest Community Church, Indian Wells St Timothy Orthodox Church St. Mary Catholic Church State College Blvd. Church of Christ, Anaheim Survivors of Assault Recovery/Living Word Christian Church, San Diego The Calvary Chapel Churches The Church of God of Prophecy, National City The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints The Home Church, Campbell The Oasis Foursquare Church The Rock Church, San Diego Tyler Baptist Church, Riverside Valley Christian Church, Chino Victory International Church, San Mateo Victory Outreach of Eagle Rock Vineyard Family Christian Fellowship, Downey Voices of Hope Ministries Whittier Church of Christ, Whittier Windsor Hills Baptist Church, La Mesa

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 7 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page8 of 44

Word of Life Ministries Int’l, Riverside Zion Christian Fellowship, Spring Valley

Individuals & Businesses

Stephanie J. Aanderud Zelinda Abbondante Father Keith Acker Charlie & Maurine Adams Kandyce Adams Michael Adams Terri Adams Douglas "Butch" Agrifoglio Lorena Aguilar Linda Allen Pastor Brad J. Allen Rachelle R. Allen Renee Allen Chris Allen Chris & Emily Allen Kimberly Allen Janette Allen-Golding Ronald Allison, M.D.- Allison Geriatrics Roger & Susan Allred Pastor John M. Almaraz Pastor Arnel Alon Ray & Lisa Alvarado Darcy Amant Kyle Amant Scott B. Ambridge Rita Amerman Stephen & Cindy Amestoy Steven L. & Gaylene P.Andersen Brenda Anderson Cynthia Anderson Diane Anderson Harry & Ruth T. Anderson Michael & Susan Anderson Olivia Anderson Theresa Anderson Brian Anderson Jennifer Anderson Theodore M. Anderson Jr. Gary Andrews Lynn Andrews Sophia Angeles Filipina Antiporda Joaquin Anzu Rodrigo Arechiga Paul Arena Grunner Argo

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 8 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page9 of 44

Carlos Antonio Argueta Elida Argueta Bonnie W. Arnold Michael Arnold Pauline Arredondo Yolanda Arvizu Gevorg Asatryan Sally A. Askew Mike Assenza Denise Astillero Nicolle S. Astle Rolland Au Eric Avelar Francene Awbrey Charles M. Axtell Concepcion Ayala Angela M. Azevedo Michael Azziz H N Bacarreza-HNB John H. Bach Jeffrey Baertschiger Linda E. Bagby Robert & Paula Bagby Joseph Bair Apostle Tiffany Baker Pastor Douglas Baker Shawn Baker Frank Baldus Jr. Kaitlin Banks Steven Banks Sandra L.Bannon Steven Bantista Ronetta Bantly Matt Barclay Clifton C. & Dorothy Barefield Paul Barney Cristina Baroelo Sean M. Barr Keith Barrick Dustin Barrington J. RubenBarron Delia Barron John E. Barrus Kirklyn Barto Cynthia D. Basso Raymond & Linda Baswell Lisa Bates Michael Batson Thomas G. Bauer (USNR, Ret.) Bruce V. & Marlene Baumann Mark Baumeister

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 9 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page10 of 44

Pastor Dick Bayard Jennifer Bayles Paul Bays Derrel Bebee Ann Beckman Carol Bedrosian Debbie Bedson Rosangel V. Belisle Randy and Lori Bell Sharon & David Bell Justin Bellville Peter Bellville Aleksei Belov David Belt Penny Belt Ray & Kathy Bence Dabid & Elsie Beneke Sara E. Benites, Teacher Howard Bennion Gary Benson Sarah Benson Russell Berg Breen Berger Douglas H. Berry James Berry James Berry Pamela A. Berry Mike & Nancy Best Best Tire and Automotive Roy A. Bicker David J. Bilar Annette Bills Celeste Bird Ron Bird Elevila Bird Robert B. Bishop Joi Bitanga Bruce Bitnoff Jeni Bitnoff Sandra M. Black Bill & Kari Blackburn Michael Blackburn Sue Blake Twila Blanchard Robert Blankenbehler Deniece Blanton Mr. & Mrs. Norbert J. Blaszkowski Tanjia Blomenkamp Daren Blonski Brian Blum James E. Blum

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 10 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page11 of 44

Sharon Blum Kacey Blunck Natalie Bodily Richard & Louise Boek Rae J. Boeving Jonathan & Claudia Boggs Kari Boisvert Robert Boisvert Carol Boivin Victoria J. Bolderoff Phyllis Boles Ron & Sharry Boles David Boling Valerie Boling Betty Bollman Gerald Bollman Lawrence J. Bollman Alla Bondar Lerce Bondy Hector Bonilla Julia E. Boone Shelly Boopor Rich Bott-Bott Radio Network Mark J. & Patricia M. Bower Harold F. Bowman Sandra Bowman Stephen R. Boyer Boy's Republic John Bradel Leslie Bradley Roberta J. Bradshaw Helen E. Bratter-Garcia Robert (R. J.) Brauer E Kelley Brautigam Mary Julia Bray Jerry Bressler Harry H. Briley Robert & Angela Brinkman Patti Brisco Lucinda Brisendine Preston Brittian Ellen Brodie Craig Brown Dr. & Mrs. John C. Brown Robert Brown Rochester Brown Tim Brown Martin Brown Vonda Brown Carl Brown Steven Brown

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 11 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page12 of 44

Dean R. Broyles Adam and Tami Brubaker John L. Brugman Bob & Diana Brunner Gary Brunsvik David D. Bryant Betty R. Bucher Michelle Bucholz Annie Buen Bruce Bull Jonathan W. Bullen Christopher Bunce Scott Bundy Pastor Kenny Burchard-The Oasis Foursquare Church Albina Burciaga Arthur & Valerie Burke HelenBurkert Julia Burkhardt Eileen Burnett Robert L. Burns Mr. & Mrs. George H. Burt Alan Burton Chris R. & Marianne Burton Andrew Butler Mary J. Buzzell, M.J.B. Floral Services Donald Byrne Marie Byrne Cherié Cackett Lyle Cairns Joe Calabretta Robert Calabretta Jock D. Calicut Benjamin Call Charity Call Catherine Callen - Lampstand Studios, Divide CO D. J. Callison Suku Camacho Kristen Hardy Campbell Pastor Charles Campbell Sean J. Campbell Catalina Campos Roger Canfield Earl Canfield Tyler Cannon Pastor Dino Cardelli Monika Cardinale Angela Cardinalli Mauro Carlin Daryl Carlson Ray Carlson Carlson Hotels

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 12 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page13 of 44

Carina Carreon Cyndilu Carreon Cynthia Carreon Jolie Carreon Don Carruth Glen Carter Lisa Carter Ron Carter- Carter Construction Company Patrick J. Carvalho Paul A. Casey Dina Castillo Colleen Cato Debbie L. Cavalli Lorna Cavener Carolyn Cavolt CC Layne & Sons Inc. Sherry Cebada Elizabeth Celaya Anthony Celaya Janet Celestine Dayna Cevallos Lauren Cevallos Julianna Chaffin Michel Chamberlain Duncan Chamberlin-Duncan's Auto Sales Angela Chambers Jiingyun Chang Myra W. Chang Marilyn T. Chantrill Ruth Chantse Pastor Jerry L. Chapman Mary Charles Florence Chau Felipe Chavez Lisa Chavez Paul A. Chavez Gabe Chavez Armineh Chelebian Jiayu Chen Samuel Cheng Noal and Lisa Chidester Roger Childers Pastor Wesley Chou Jenolyn Christensen Sharon R. Christensen Tyler Christensen Julie and Tom Christian Martin Christiansen Darin & Maria Christmas W.H. Chuang Leighon Chun

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 13 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page14 of 44

Donald L. Clark Paul Clark Hailey Clark Greg & Carie Clark Craig Clark Gabby & JorgeClavel Kevin Clayton Weatherford Clayton Richard and Marie Clayton- Maric Services Jack A. Cleeton Trudy Clinkscales Lindsay Clontz MaryAnnClontz Fred Colborn Michelle A. Coldiron Brandi Cole Rachel Cole Angela Colgan Ann Coligny Robert N. & Nancy G. Collins Theodore Colunga Andrew Comiskey Community West Mortgage Linda Concepcion David R. Conley Ruth Conley Rochelle Conner Francis B. Connolly Steve Conran Pastor Jim A. Contreras Lucy D. Cook Misty Cook Stacy Cook Terry Cooley Gibbons Cooney Liz Cooper Sheri Jane Cooper Curtis Cooper Carlton Copa Robyn Copa Rachel Copeland Susan Copeland Patrick A. Copland Dora Cordery Gloria Cordova Diana Corry Eleno Cortez Rigoberto Cosio Tony Cotroneo Grant Cottam Jan Courtney

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 14 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page15 of 44

Steven Cowley Steve Cox Emily Craig Lynda Crane Joshua Crawford Kathleen Crawford Sheyla Creel Terri Creel Joni Criscione Brenda Crosier Brenda Crosier Jim Crowley Ron Crummett Jennifer Cruzen Debbie Culp David Cundari Lori Cundari Robert Curry Clara Curtis Eldon Cyrus- Cyrus Tree Service Sal & Dora D’Accardo Mitch Dabo RobinDaffern Thomas B. Dafoe – Briden Wilson Farm, Arbuckle Greg Dagostino Theresa L. Dahlen Donald V. Dales William Dalton Howarth Dan Pastor David Daniel Anita Daniels Kenneth E. Danielson Virginia Dansby Michael Darius-M Concepts Pastor Barbara Davenport DottieDavid Memrie Davies Pastors Bob & Mona M. Davies Steven & Judy Davies Betty Davis Eric & Anna Davis Mary H. Davis Reverend James E. Davis Stephen Davis Barbara B. Dawdy Kristen De Jong Kevin De_Laere V. & G. Dea Victor & GlendaDeacon Matt Deakin Michelle Deakin

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 15 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page16 of 44

Rayline Dean Kevin L. DeBondt John DeCesare, President - inetMatrix Arlene Decker Paul Deffebach Renee Degerman Daniel DeGroff Heber & Pamela DeLand William DeLeon Nick Delgado Carmela (Carmie) Dellyson Debra DeLong Raymond J. DeLong Shirley DeLosie Steve Denison E. Denniston, Contractor: Creative Builders Mark Denton Keith & Lois DeRousse Jerry Deveraux Bonita L. Devers Anthony Michael DeVeto Janice Lee DeVeto Earl & Judy DeVries Peter Diaz Jackie Diaz Dominic DiBlasio Marilyn N. Dick David and Eleanor Dickson Reverend Edward M. Dicochea Virginia Dicochea Tanner M. Dietrich Paul F. Diffley, III Pastor Shane DiLisi Laura Dillender Sofik Diluchian RobertDimby Laura DiPaola Bishop Roy Dixon, Pastor Tracy Doan Martha Dobler Andreas Dobler E. L. Dockens Reginald Dodd Pastor Jim Domen Kathleen Domingo Joseph F. Donahue KellyDonnelly Melody A. Donnelly Shawn M. Donnelly Michael Dooley Rayette Dooley

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 16 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page17 of 44

Kimberly Dority Trent Douglass Diane Y. Dow Richard & Diane Dow Phillip Dragna Vern Dransfeldt Robert & JadwigaDrumheller Caylene Drummond Del Drummond George Duarte Janie B. Duarte John P. Duarte Frank & Monica Duenes Christie Duffy Steven H. & Laurie R. Dukett Simona Duliga Mary Dunaway James D. Duncan Jonathan Duncan Patricia L. Dunn Lisa K. Dunne Damon Dusterhoft Dick Dusterhoft Ken Dye Willard Dye Andee Eady John & Taressa Earl Joyce Edge, Founder/President – Survivors of Assault Recovery Maggie M. Edwards Ruth Edwards Vern A. Edwards John A. Ehlen E.C.H.W. Roger & Helen Ekins Janice M. Ellis David Eltiste Kenneth B. & Catreena English Leonna M. Epperson William C. Epperson Julia Erickson Michael Erickson Reah M. Esau Gloria Escamilla George Escobar Michael Esquivel Danielle Estrada David J. Evans, CPA Jason & Andrea Ewell – Jason’s Glass Tint, San Clemente Frances Ewing Anabel Fabela Fahillion Technology Consultants Patricia Ann Fairbourn

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 17 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page18 of 44

William Familia Charmaine Fanara, Depew NY Linda Fanene Wayne Fanene Grace R. Fant George Farley Cathy Ferrell Gerald Fessard Pastor George D. Fessler Fetal Diagnostic Center Christine Fetrow Paul Fice Seth T. Field Ricky Fielding Bob Fields Jesse Fimbres Sharen Finley Harold E. Fisher Janet E. Fisher Margaret M. Fisher Gilbert Fisher Connor Fitzgerald Terri & Don Fletcher Frances A. Flisram J and M Flohrschutz Clementina (Tina) Flores Stephen Flores Greg Florey Pastor Edward L. Flowers Kari Fobar Stanley C. Fogle Taylor Ford Linda Forman Sam & Lenora Forsen Rebecca Forsyth Todd Forsyth Eric J. & Nina Louise Fosberg Lucy Foster Steve & Jo Ann Foster Paul Fournier Colleen A. Fowler Elise Reneé Fowler Kelly Fox Lloyd P. Fox Carolyn Francis Loren Franck Raul & Janice E. Franco Larry Frasch Rognor Fredlund Harold C. Freeman Marjorie E. Freeman

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 18 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page19 of 44

Jose Fregoso Robert F. Freman Bruce French Diane Fronce Dale and Glynn Ann Fry Bob & Glenell Fuller Tim Fulton Melanie Furman Walsh Joan Furtsch Terry Furukawa Ernest Fusi Elizabeth Gaines John Gaines, D.D.S. Lucian Galev April H. Gallart Tammi L. Galley Mercy Gamal Ruth Gamblin Gerald A. Gamblin Mesha M. Gann Forrest Garchow Brenda Garcia Esparanza Garcia Felipe Garcia Gloria Garcia Jose G. Garcia Richard Gard Paula Gardner Martin Garff Pastor Greg A. Garman James Garrick Peter J. Gautille AnnGeerken Amaya Genaro Evan Gentry Russell & Wendy Gentry Vicki Gerlek Mary Gerrard Mark E. Gething, Insurance - Amarillo TX Gwendolyn A. Gettmann James Gettys GFBB Benefits and Insurance Peter Giannini, CPA Cyndi Gibbs Lynne Gil Stacy Gilani Timothy Giles John & Gina Gleason Keith Gleason Bethany Glenwinkel Eric Glover- Wellspring Church

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 19 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page20 of 44

Stephen Glowacz John J. Gobbell, Jr., Real Estate Appraiser Janet Goddu, Missionary Goldie Gold Harry J. Golding Pam Gonsalves Keith Gonser Minister Caren Lee Gonser Everardo & Socorro Gonzalez IreneGonzalez Remie Gonzalez Cecilia Gonzalez Jessica Gonzalez Moreno Larry Goodman Pastor Eugene Gordon Sr. Ted and Leah Goslen Helen Verdugo Gowans Amanda Graham Donna Graham Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth C. Grandall Jason & Lisa Granillo Peter J. Grant Marcie Gray SandyGray Jerry & June Green Mark Green Mr. & Mrs. Spencer H. Green Robert I. Greenwood Richard A. & Susan J. Gregg, SueGreggCookbooks, Riverside Mike Griffin Michael Griffith David Grimes Steve & Kathleen Groom Karen L. Grube Cynthia Gruchala Sharon Guengerich Deren Guerrero Jr. David Guheen Nicole Guillen Scott & Eliete Gulbransen Dianna Gurnett Ruth Gustafson Suzie Gutierrez Alison Gutierrez Bill and Eva Guttierez Liz Guttierez Guillermo Guzman Rosa Guzman Ward Habriel Tim Hady Lyla B. Haga

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 20 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page21 of 44

Tarah Hale David Hales Alan J. Hall Andy Hall Donna Hall Glen Hall Mary Melissa Hall Richards & JoanneHall Harry Haller Donn Hallman Christina Hallmeyer David Ham Pastor Donald C. Hamer David Hamilton Laura Hamilton Richard A. Hampton Nathan Hamre Belinda Hanks Keith Hanks, Azusa City Councilmember Joel Hanna Karen Hansen Kevin Hansen Melanie A. Hansen Terri Hansen Ylondra Hargrove Grant Russell Harmon Aram H. Haroutounian Shauna Harrel Steve Harrell Jake Harries Sidney Harrington Wayne D. Harris Eileen Harrison Jeffrey Harrison Paul & Cheryl Harrison Tressa Hart Renee Hartmann Cliff Hartwell Dwight Eric Harvey Dennis G. Haskins Shirley Haskins Michelle Hass Lewis Hassel Babette Hauselmann Heidi Haynie Albert & Sarah Hazeltine Mr. & Mrs. Gerald J. Healey Michelle Heard Kristi Hebbard Phyllis Hebbard Mary Hebert

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 21 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page22 of 44

Peter & Sydne Heidrich Stephen A. Heimann IsaacHellsva Rusty Helms Delwin Hemingway Kyle Henderson Dr. Jay W. Henderson, President - The Law Offices of Jay W. Henderson, Ltd. Charles Hendrix Pastor Brian Hendry Michael R. Henley Teresee L. Henney Craig Henry Sr. Pastor David Henry Christopher Henry Christian Herland Jennifer Hermann Chris Hermansen Carmen Hernandez Laurie Hernandez Pastor Jay Hernandez Carrie Herr Jeff Herring Brett Hersom Florence Hess Tommy Jean Hester Ted Heumann John Hickman Terry Higham Douglas F. Higham, Snr. Sr. Pastor Jim Hilbrant Angela C. Hill Delores Hill Madeline and Danny Hill Ross Hillesheim Stephanie Hilligoss Wesley C. Hilton Rowdy Hinchman Douglas Hinckley Julia Hoch David Hodges Gordon Hodnette Minda S. Hoffman Paul A. Hoffman Greg A. Hoffman Taylor Hoggan Nicole Hogge Mark Hogge Thomas A. Hoheisel Fredrick & Sue Ellyn Hohnbaum Joseph Holland Gary Holley

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 22 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page23 of 44

Sasshua Hollomon Douglas Hollowell Blair C. Holman Steven Holmes Marcia J. Holtsclaw Michael A. Holtsclaw Home Instead Senior Care - Fresno & Modesto Will Honeycutt Jim & Patty Hoover Frances G. Hopkins Marva Horn Scott M. Horton David & Elizabeth B. Houghton Jeff Hovik Justin Howard Eleanor Janice Howell Elder Walter B. Hoye II Shirley Hoyer Charles L. Hoyt Sr. Pastor Matthew P. Hsie Jennifer Hsieh Ryan Hsu George Hu Nancy L. Huelskamp George T. Hughes Lucinda H. Hughes Jim Hughes NaomiHunt Sally Hunt Michael Hunter Shauna Hutchins RonHutchinson Shan-Jye Jack Hwang Marie Hyepock Aaron Hymas John Hymes I Wannabe Costumes Norma & Lorenzo Ibarra Stefan A. Ignaczak Maureen A. Imoe Maggie Ingersall Amanda M. Ingram Sandy Ingram Inspired Stylus Writing and Copyediting GLen Inverso- MJ Baxter Drilling Company Marti Irish Tammy Iverson Alan Iwata Mr. & Mrs. Steven A. Jackson Brad Jackson Clay Jackson

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 23 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page24 of 44

Amy James Zachary James Jezanah Janiak Chris Janiak Jeff Jaskulsky Emily Jeffries Gale Jenkins Matthew Jennings Debra Jensen Eric & Becky Jensen Richard Jergenson R. Christian Jesperson- Chiropractic Family Health Center Marc Jessee Andrea Jewell Amber Johnson Arthur L. Johnson Brian Johnson Bryce and Sharon Johnson Dr. Karalee S. Johnson F. A. Johnson Gary Johnson H. Stanton Johnson Katrice Johnson Mary Ellen Johnson Wanda Johnson Gary Johnson Scott Johnson Amy Johnson Julie Johnson Heather Johnson Sharon Johnson Marc Johnson K. Johnson, Teacher Richard Johnstone Elizabeth Jones Monica Jones Pastor Stephen Jones Reverend Melvin O. Jones Utah Jones Janice Jonwa Leteicha Jordan Nancy E.Jordan Emily Juan Minister Rhonda Judd Russell Judd Sr. Pastor Rick Judd Th.D Dorothy F. Jung Brian Kaess Allison Kahle Frances L. Kambury Jefferson Kane

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 24 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page25 of 44

Maurice Kane Mike D. Kania Ken K. Kaplan Mark Karlin Sue and Russ Kashow Kim Katayama Ronald G. Kays Vicki D. Kays Clarissa T. Kayser Katie Keate Steven G. Keck Robert Keele Pastor Erik Keeling Lamar & Theresa Keener Jennifer Keeney William R. Keith Jr. Jerome R. Kelley William & Debra E. Kellogg Roy P. Kelsberg Rebecca Kennedy Richard Kerr- Kerr Real Estate Advisors Walter L. & Martha Kersey Elmer H. Keys Madelyn Amini Kharrazi Heros Paul Khudabakhshyan Marsha E. Killian Rhonda Killion Cheri Kimball Stan Kimball Rachel Kimbler James P. King Justin King PatKintzer Pat Kintzner James E. Kirby Camm Kirk Diana Kirk Reed & DonnaKirkland Martha L. Kirton Kristine Kiser Pastor George Kistler Rachel “Shelly” Kitada Bruce Kite Steele Kizerian Steele Kizerian Marilyn Lee Klassen Monica Klaver, Margate FL Hans W. Kletke Cameron Knapp George M. Knapp, Investment Advisor: Knapp Financial Gail J. Knight

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 25 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page26 of 44

Jennifer Knight James Knox, American Focus Former Congressman Ernie Konnyu Brian Kosobrynski Marianne Kott Kevin Kowey Robin Kraucyk William Krick Reverend Daniel Kricorian Linda Krier Gina Krul Virginia B. Kurrle L.A.U.S.D. Dr. Rafik George Labib Esther Lam Sr. Pastor Rick Lancaster Jamie Lao JoanLaPorte Frank LaRocque Mary LaRocque Jacob Larson James Larson Jodi Larson Lynette Larson Mamie L. Larson Wilma Larson Kathy Lasko Dr. James H. Lau Shirley S. Lau Shelly Laurence David Lauritzen Law Offices of Kimber B. Goddard Matthew Lawless Richard Laws Kimberly L. Lawson Robert Leatham Greg Leddy Phylis Ledesma Donald R. & Jody Lee Elaine K. Lee MaryLeetah Manuel A. Lemos Connie Lentsch Frank N. Lentsch David Leonard Penny Leptich Beth Lester Wing Leung Andrew Levy Edmund Lew Sheila Lewellen

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 26 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page27 of 44

Harold Lewis Murray E. Lewis Dorothy Agnes Lewolt Dina Lie Eric Lile Carolyn Limana Janet M. Linn Richard W. Linn Dr. James D. Lisle Gordon Liu RosalieLocey Taylor Loesch Lanny Logue David Lopez Kari L. Lopez Pam Lord Lorraine Loria Frank Lossa Ted Louis Pastor J. D. Loveland Janeen Lozada Pastor Samson B. Lubag John Lubin Sydney Lubin J. Diann Ludwick Eunice Lugenbuehl Joan Lukens William Lukens Michael Lusk Laura Ly Alicia Lyons Tavish MacGregor Tanya Mack Rebekah Mackie Thomas MacPherson Brenda D. Madanat Geraldine Madariaga Christopher P. Madden Ed Madrid SteveMadsen Matthew Maduemesi David W. & Alice G. Magnusson: Haws, Record & Magnusson, Attorneys at Law Laureice Maheux Gilbert Mainit Sr. Kenneth Mallett Patricia G. Mallory Tim & Chong Hae Mallory Frank Malquist Vlade Mamayev, CEO – Buildex Inc. Cathy R. Mamill DianeManano

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 27 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page28 of 44

Greg W. Mangrum Anita Mann Barry Mann Sandra Manriquez Mary Manson Janice Maples Nora O. Marin - Little Angel's Daycare, Rancho Cordova Patty Marine Jeff Marr Robert and Lisa Marrujo Erica Marshall John Marshall JusufMartidjaja Barbara A. Martin Hugh Martin Lauren Martin Lisa Martin Micah Martin Pastor Isaac Martin Bo & Kathy Martin Wayne M. Martin – Wayne Martin Associates, Oxnard Inga Martinchuk Aura R. Martinez Alicia Martinez Gary Mason Jules A. Massa Lanette Masters Anthony Matar Wendy Matthews David & Kaile Mattice JaneMattlock Stephen Matuszak Maximum Marketing Inc. Lora Maxwell Mary Helen Maxwell Robert B. Maxwell Judith Mayada John Mayfield David Mayo William F. Mays Adam Mazzaferro Tony Mazzaferro Pamela A. McAnally C. L. McArthur Katherine McArthur Diana McBay Allen C. McBeth Frances McCall Pearson Frances McCall-Pearson Lacey McCleve Jennifer McClure

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 28 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page29 of 44

Anita McClusky Eleanore McComb Michael McCormick V. Glenn McCoy Adam McDavitt Karen S. McDonald Brian McElhiney Charles McElroy Bruce McEwan Jacquelyn McFarlin MikeMcGill – Former Mayor, City of Cypress Diana McGonigle Kelly McGovern Michael McGovern Patricia McHenry JoAnnMcIntosh Stephen McLelland Dagny McMillien Joel McMinn Patricia McMinn Douglas McMullin Douglas McMullin, MD Brenda McNeill Lynnette Mead Dr. Ann Marie Meagher Peter E. Medellin Ismael Medina Lisa Medrano Joshua Scott Lee Mehr Lisa Meikle Diana Mejia Merly Lizzette Mejia Bishop Andrew Melendez Henry Melendez Sheri Mendon Daniel Mendoza Dr. S. C. Menyhay Brian A. Merrell RobertMerrill Stefanie Kelly Merritt Paula H. Meservy Ken Mettler Elder Charles R. "Pacer" Metzenberg, Nicholasville KY Pastor Steve Meyer Carl Meyocks Michael Meza Brad & Olga Michaels Jeff Michelson JoAnn Michelson Baron Miller Michael Miller

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 29 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page30 of 44

Robertson Miller Sr. Pastor Jim Miller Kelly Miller Anchi Miller – ATM International, Kirkland WA Marcus Milligan Jackie Milton Ronald A. Miner Mark & Reneé Minick Eileen Minnick Loren Minnick Maria Miranda Patricia A. Mitchell Robert D. Mitchell Shawn Mitchell Randy Mlekush Robert Mohn Mr. & Mrs. Gerald E. Mokma Erick Molander Eric Molander Ridley R. Molders – Molders Logistics, Santa Ana Dawna Montgomery Stephanie Montoya Janelle Moon Roger D. Moon, Minister John Moore Ryan Moore Assad Mora Esther L. Morehead Maria Moreno Susan Morgan Jane Morgan Ellisa Morine Jacey Cody Morine Cathy R. Morrill Laura Morris Scott & Amanda Morris Walter Morris III Steven Morris, Northborough MA Evitta Morrow Timothy L. Morrow Thomas S. and Karen L. Mortensen Scott & Carrie Motley Marshall Neal Mouw Fredric Movey Yajaira Mower Todd Mowrey-Fit-To-Be-Tyed Pastor William J. Moyer Katie Mueller Mary Mull Gene & Carolyn Mullins Fabricio Mundo- LinearB Enterprises

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 30 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page31 of 44

Ruth Munoz-Fredricksen Chimene L. Murphy Edward Murphy Kelly Murphy Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Murrell John Musick Toni Muus Dr. Richard G. Myatt Dave & Darlene G. Myers Sally A. Myers Barbara C. Myler W. Garrett Myler W. Scott Myler Dr. David Nahrstedt Beverly Nalick Ayden & Rachel Nathan Ramon Navarro Matthew and Angela Neeley Nola Neeley Jeff Neese David Neilson Monique Nelsen Margaret T. Nelson Mr. & Mrs. Edward A. Nelson Patricia Nelson Jeff Nelson Stacy Nelson Ian Neubert Brad Neufeld Kim Neuzil Dennis Newbold Bralynn Newby T. William Newman Greg Newman Mark Nguyen Monique Nguyen Tuan Nguyen Christopher Nichols Daniel Nichols Ken Nichols Stacy Nichols Victory Nichols SteveNicholson Pastor Glenn Nicolas Shirley Nicolay John W. Nicoll Matt Nicosia Dee AnneNilges Lourdes Nilon Rex Nishimora Richard Nordan

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 31 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page32 of 44

Don Nordgren, Owner - Pacific Coast Auto Body, Paint & Frame, San Diego Gerald C. Nordskog David Norman Gary Norman Pastor Earl Eugene Norwood Erwin R. Null Dr. Willie G. Nutt, Pastor/CEO Karen S. Nyquist Jaime O’Brien Robert D. O’Brien Jack F. O’Connor Harold R. O’Neill Eliseo Odrea Jr. Janel Ogden Walt and Jill Oilar Charlcie Olivier Eileen T. Olson Judy Olson Maria E. Tomlinson Debra O'Neil Nathan Orien Barbara J. Orozco Manuel Orozco Rebecca Orozco Nina Orr Michael J. & Mary Orradre EdwardOrrco Maria J. Ortiz Miriam Ortiz Dr. Phillip Ortiz, President/Owner - Direct to You Mobile Dentistry, Murrieta Jason Orton John P. Owens Bill and Pam Pacheco Jessika Packman Michael A. Padgett – Law Office, Fontana Ryan Page Joy Pagliara Jackie Pak Joseph & Cheryl Palechek BillPalmer Cedric Papa Stacy Papa Bret and Jeanine Parker C.W. Parker Kathy Patmore Mora Tom Patrick Carlos Patterson Donna Patterson Mickey Payne Marcelo Paz Manuela Peace

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 32 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page33 of 44

Teresa Peacock Donal Pearce Pastor Scott Pearson Reverend Laura Pedota Larry Pegram Michael Penn Pastor Pete Perez Rose Perez Roxanne Perez Della Pershing Alexis Perumal Donna R. Peters Kent Peters Kate Petersen David and Eileen Peterson Laurie Peterson Nichole Peterson John Peterson Paul Peterson N.J.Phelps Victoria Phelps Steven Philips Lynn Phillips Billie Jo Phipps Donna Pineda Julie Pinkston Dr. Oly Pittman Cookie Plotz Marilyn B. Poole Merritt & Jen Postma Paul Pothier – The Paleo Conservatist, Yorba Linda Craig Poulson Beverly J. Powell Ron Powers Mark Powers David & Jo D. Preston Ila Jean Price Lance Price Ora G. Price Brian Profancik Patty Prokop Donald R. Prosceno Quentin T. Prosser Gloria Pruyne Giacomo Puccini Ferdi Pura Deby Quandt Damon Quella Heather Quella Bradley L. Quick - Bradley L. Quick Insurance Agency Grettel P. Quijano

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 33 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page34 of 44

Eduardo E. Quimson Susan Quinn Tony Quinteros Gar W. Quock Patricia Raburn Robert W. Radcliff Rick J. Radecki – Lion’s Roar Media, Victorville Harold & Kathleen Radloff Kristyn Radmilovich Jennings O. Raff Karen H. Rafferty Shannon K. Rafferty Wilma Rahmeyer Loretta Raia John & Laura Rallios N. Scott Ralph Lisa Rapoza Marion S. & Rebecca Ray Warren & Tami Ray Sharilynn Reaser Pastor Jim Reed Kathy Yoak Rees Ralph Rees David Reese Kathleen A. Reese Catherine Regalado Roy Regalado Anna Regan Jason Regehr Emmanuel Rego Peter M. Reimer - Peter Reimer Farms, Shafter Reimer's Wholesale Nursery Brandon Renfro, Lay Pastor – Calvary Baptist Church, Modesto Brady Rentz Deborah Rex Kristine Reyes Sanchez Reynaldo Julia Rhome Margene Rich Catherine Richardson Gerry Rickert – Cottonwood Quilting, Silverado George Rickert – Rickert Cabinetry, Silverado Nikki Ricks George Riley Lyrad Riley Dan Rindge Anthony Rios- First Security Home Loans Sharon Ripley Lisa Rivera Elka Rivers-Lucas Ken Rizzo

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 34 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page35 of 44

Frank R. Rizzo, Jr. Patricia D. Roach Aaron Roberson Pastor Larry Roberts Judith Robertson Tina Robertson Aaron Robertson Mr. & Mrs. Carroll A. Robinson Pastor Archie Robinson Phyllis E. Roche Laurie Rodgers Mark Rodgers David Rodricks Lorraine Rodricks Angela D.Rodriguez Deacon David Rodriguez Patricia A. Rodriguez Sr. Pastor Mike Rodriguez Moseis Rodriguez Marshall H. Roe Karen Roelke JanisRogers Rebecca Rojas Pastor Bruce Rokus Denise M. Roland – Reliable Referrals LLC, La Crosse WI Debbie Romano Pastor John S. Romick Donald & Barbara Romine Johnny Rose Matthew Rosetto Faye M. Roskelley Joyce Roskelley Dr. Clint J. Ross John Rotondo Joseph P. Rotter Jared Rowley Linda S.Roy Herbert Rubi Linda Rubino Noel Ruffner James Ruggieri Linda Ruggieri Marco & Christina Ruiz Mariko & Kim L. Ruppert Susan R. Rush Claude & Patricia Russell Wes Russell Sr. Pastor Lewis A. Russo Nathan Russon John Ruszak Andrew M. Rutherford

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 35 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page36 of 44

W. Marie Rutherford Sr. Pastor Stan Rutkowski Scott Sacker William Sacriste Rachelle Saldate Denise R. Salomon David Samarin Elizabeth Sammons Jo Ann Samonte Pastor Moises D. U. San Luis Cheri Sanchez Frank Sanchez Jasmine Sanchez Katy Sanchez Melissa Sanchez Natali Sanchez Pamela Sanchez Cody Sanders Dennis Sanders Joel Sanders – Sanders Heavy Towing, Williams Melanie Sardo Ross L. Sardo – RLS Inspections, Inc. Ventura Scott & Marci Sargent George Saroyan David Saunders SteveSaunders Kelli Saunders Pastor David Sawkins Shirley J.Sawyer Sr. Pastor Duane A. Sayre Robert Scarborough Carol Schaefer Allen Scott Scharpen Klaus Scharpf Janet H. Scheer Eleanore Ruth Schellenberger Tom & Cecilia Schieber Patrick Schiller Janice Schindler, President - Schindler & Schindler Inc. Fountain Valley Debbie Schroeder Scott Schubert Elizabeth T. Schultz Nancy Schweitzer V. Garnet Scoles Chasity Scott Scott McDonald & Assoc. Sharon A. Scranton SCVHHS Ed Seaman Jessica Sears SierraSeaward

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 36 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page37 of 44

Dave Sedgwick Virginia B. Sedgwick Laura Seigel Carol Sellwood Jeff Sellwood Senior Helper's Anthony J. Serra Todd Seymore Melissa Seymour Zane and Cathy Shaeffer Kathie Shannon Carol A. Shaw Marlin D. Shaw Bishop Jack A. Sheets Joseph Sheffield Linda Sheffield Monica Sheffield David Shepard Heath Sheppard Serin Shin Reginald Shinn John & Shirley Baldwin Don Shoemaker Jill Shun Dorcas Siah Pastor Jonathan Siah Patricia Sigg Fern A. Sikich Marilyn Sincock Greg Sincok Angela Sisneroz, MEDELEC Monica Siverts Karen Skrede Pastor Rolland Slade Conrad Sloan David Smalley, M.D. Brent Smedley Aubrey & Diann Smith Brad Smith Cameron Smith Charlotte L. Smith Emily Smith Hillard & Eno Smith James & Nichole Smith Loran Smith Loretta Smith Peggy Louise Smith Sandra Smith Scott & Valary Smith Douglas Smith Patricia Smith – Classic Clean, Inc. Los Gatos

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 37 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page38 of 44

Heather Snow Robert Snow Bryan Snyder Samantha Sobarzo James Sohn Robert Sohn, Plantation FL Armando Solano Rosalia Solano Virginia Solis Pastor Ruben Solorio Margerie A. Sorbi Amy Soto Chrystal Soto Camille Southam Gordon Southam Pietro Sozio Vernon & Lorre Spangler Diana Spangler Sam Spangler Kathryn Sparks Jackie T. Spears Eric Spelman Mike Spence Douglas Spencer Rubin and Linda Spencer Elizabeth Sperry Karl Splaine Robert Spotswood Peter Spotts, Wis Dells WI Pastor Mike Spradlin Steven Sprague Steven Sprenger Barbara Spriggs Dan Sroufe Linda St. Amand Mildred St. John Greg Stager Kerry Stainbrook Jennae Standing Antonia C. Stanley Mary Statham Betty A. Stedman Ken & Sherie Steege Virginia Steinwinter Mike & Sharon Stelter Brian & Melanie Stengel Mr. & Mrs. Wayne I. Stephens Traci Stephenson Jerry Stevens Cynthia L. Stevens - Cynthia’s Cleaning Service Michael & Michelle Stevenson

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 38 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page39 of 44

Andrea Stevenson Robert D. Stevenson, DDS Douglas Stevenson-Quietcool, inc. Jonathan Stewart Sr. Pastor Wayne A. Stockstill Charles & Jan Stoddard Randy Stoltenberg Ginny Story George E. Strawbridge Diane S. Streich Lina Streich Paul D. Stringer Linda Stringfellow Wilbur Struck Tami Stuart Stubblefield Family Chiropractic Pastor Earl C. Stuckey Norman Sturgeon Francine Styerwalt Scott Suchomel-Sibling Systems Desiree Sullivan Taylor John Sultz Nancy Sutherland Rebekah Sutherland J. L. Swagger Kay Swartzendruber Ashley Swearengin Rose Sweet, Owner - RF Sweet & Associates Real Estate, Palm Desert CA David Sweitzer Elizabeth Sweitzer Dale Swirsding Brian Swisher Shakeel Syed Brian & Jennie Rose Sylva Carson Taber Bob Tait Denette Tanksley David E. & Susan E.Tanner Stephen Tarbell Eliza I. Tate Karen L. Tavano Robert V. Tavano Alan D. Taylor Denise Taylor KymTaylor Norma Taylor Pastor Randy Taylor Rebecca Taylor Richard G. Taylor Tim & Jennifer Taylor TennieTeeple

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 39 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page40 of 44

Hillary Tejada Lillian J. Teran James E. Terry Toni Terry Judith Tesone Margaret Teusch Moses Tey Carole K. Thomas Lori Thomas Marvin J. Thomas Joseph Thomas Ruth A. Thomason Bud Thompson Damaris Thompson Deanna R. Thompson Ginger Thompson Gregg B. Thompson Karri Thompson Phillip Thompson Robert Thompson Scott Thompson Thomas W. Thompson Tom Thoner Rose Thornton Andrew Thorup Linda J. Throop, Missionary Ellen Tidwell Silvia Tijerina Loralee I. Tinney Timothy Titus Mari Todd Justin Tolman Frances Tom CarolTomko R Jill Tomlinson Todd & JillTomminson William Parker Tong Carla E. J. Torrence Isaias Torres Julie E. Torres Earl Totty Pastor Raymond Trembath Gary Trimble Rebecca Trimble Sikione Tufuga Bonnie J. Turano Nicholas R. Turano III Justin Turner Sharline Turner Forrest L. Turpen Theodore (Ted) & Dawn Turrentine

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 40 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page41 of 44

Erika Tutwiler Sr. Pastor William R. Tvedt, Oskaloosa IA Joylyn Twitchell Jon Ulbrich Carolyn Umana Larry Urdahl Gilbert T. Urrea, Jr. Renee Valdez Steven Valdez Renato V. Valencia, Engineer William U. Valencia, Tax Consultant: Valencia Tax Service Rudy & Shirley Valverde Debbie Van Allen David Van Blerkom Randy Van Dueck Ryan Vanderheide Karlynn vanDiggelen Neil Vargas Paul Vargas Angel Vargas Gabriella Vasta Gina Vejar Carlos Velasco Trina Velez Allison Villa Susan Villamor Oscar & Diana Villeda Edgar L. Vincent Raymond & Alicia Virgen Vision Beth Vogel Amber Vogt Lavonda Volzke Martin Von Raesfeld Elisa Vondra James Vondra Pastor Tim Voogd James Vye Lawrence Wagner William J. Wagner Marjorie Wagoner Vickie Wagstaff Tom Wahweotten Joe Waite Troy Waite Dr. David M. Walden - Chaplain Dr. David M. Walden – MOTE Inc., San Diego Betty Walker F. R. Walker Matt Walker Pastor Phillip Walker

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 41 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page42 of 44

Rachel Y. Walker Robert Walker Mark Walker Keith Walker, Writer-Publisher: Golden Door Press Marjorie L. Wallace Alberta F.Walls Mr. & Mrs. John Walls Steve Walsh Jenny L. Walters Shane L. Walters Alex C. Wang Amy Ward Alan Warner John Warren Richard S. Warren Warren Photography, Victorville Martin Washington Steven R. Waters Craig Waters Mike and Denise Waterworth Del La Verne Watson Donald & Suzanne R. Webb Earleen A. Webb Rusty Webb Roxanne Weber Greg Webster William Webster Robert R. Weedon LCSW, Coherent Counseling Services Luis Weger Jeffrey Glen Weight Danny & Lonnie Wells Gregory Wells Parker Wells Pastor John Wells Shelly Wells Jayson Wendell Lori R. Wenger Bruce Wenzel Peggy Wenzel Sr. Pastor Jerry W. Westholder Darrell K. Westover Greg & Susan Wheeler Bob Whitaker Chris D. White Jacquelyn White James White James J. & Laurie C. White Janalee K. White Mahlon R. White Gloria White Ron & Julie White

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 42 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page43 of 44

Linda White White Diamond Jewelers Paula Whitley Wayne Whitley Pamela Whitmer Dale L. Whitmore Jack M. Wickland Valerie Wiesen Kayla Wight Ivory Wilderman Susan Wilhelm Nancy Wilkes Cheri Williams Jennifer L. Williams Kjersti Williams Nancy Williams Pastor Jo Anna Williams R. Wayne & Pat Williams Rev. Gary Williams Sam Williams Vanessa Williams Marion Williams Charles Williamson Glenn & Janet Willingham Judy Wills Cheri Wilson Harvey Wilson Jeremy Wilson Joe Wilson Keith Wilson Lequoia A. Wilson Brooks Wilson Barbara A. Wilt Allyn & Barbara Winchel Pastor Randall C. Wing Todd Winkler Evangelist Nadeen M. Wolf Sandie Wolf Pastor Caren Wolfe Duane Wolterstorff Davina A. Wonderling Karen J. Wong Diane Wonnacott Reverend Brenda J. Wood Stephen Wood Tona W. Wood Mary Wood Lois J. Woodruff Dan Woodruff Taryn and Becky Woolley Ellen L. Wooten

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Protect Marriage » Endorsements Page 43 of 43 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-5 Filed12/30/09 Page44 of 44

Pastor Art Wooten Corey Wright J. Fred Wright Donald Wright Mr. & Mrs. James & Melissa Wright Betcy Wrye Pastor Rose Wun Francis L. Wycoff Beverly I. Wyer Nate & Gwendolyn Wyne Michael A. Yambra TerryYang Martin Yeung Nicole Yeung Harry R. York John E. Young Kesaia Young Michael Young Ken & Beatriz Younger Lisa Yu Jeffrey Yuan Shu-Chih Yuen Mindi Zappe Kenneth L. Zeen Clint Zollinger

© 2008 ProtectMarriage.com. All Rights Reserved. ProtectMarriage.com is a project of California Renewal (I.D. #1302592) | Contact Us

http://web.archive.org/web/20080821225712/http://protectmarriage.com/endorsements 12/20/2009 Doc. 329 Att. 5 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 16

EExxhhiibbiitt FF

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 16

1 ADVOCATES FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM Robert H. Tyler (CA Bar No. 179572) 2 [email protected] Jennifer L. Monk (CA Bar No. 245512) 3 [email protected] 24910 Las Brisas Road, Suite 110 4 Murrieta, California 92562 Telephone:951-304-7583; Facsimile: 951-600-4996 5

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL 8 T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW (Northern 9 District of California) Plaintiffs, 10 SCHUBERT FLINT’S RESPONSES v. AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ 11 SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR 12 capacity as ; EDMUND G. OBJECTS OR TO PERMIT BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney INSPECTION OF PREMISES 13 General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his 14 official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of 15 Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information 16 & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his 17 official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County 18 of Alameda; and DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for 19 the County of Los Angeles,

20 Defendants,

21 and

22 PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J. 23 KNIGHT, MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ, HAK- SHING WILLIAM TAM, and MARK A. 24 JANSSON; and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM – YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA 25 RENEWAL,

26 Defendant-Intervenors.

27

28

SCHUBERT FLINT’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page3 of 16

1 Pursuant to Rules 26 and 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Schubert Flint Public

2 Affairs, Inc., (“Schubert Flint”) hereby objects to the Subpoena issued by Plaintiffs in the above 3 captioned matter dated September 17, 2009 and served on Schubert Flint on September 24, 2009 as 4 follows: 5 GENERAL OBJECTIONS 6 7 1. Schubert Flint is still in the process of completing its factual investigation in connection 8 with the Subpoena served on it less than two weeks ago. Accordingly, these objections and

9 responses are provided without prejudice to Schubert Flint’s right to produce subsequently

10 discovered documents and materials, or to modify, change or amend these responses and 11 objections. The information provided in these objections is nevertheless true and correct to the 12 best of Schubert Flint’s knowledge at this time. 13 2. Schubert Flint specifically incorporates by reference the objections and arguments set 14 15 forth by Defendant-Intervenors in the following: 1) Defendant-Intervenors’ responses to Plaintiffs’ 16 Discovery Requests; 2) Defendant-Intervenors’ Motion for Protective Order (Doc # 187); 3)

17 Defendant-Intervenors’ Reply in Support of Motion for Protective Order (Doc # 197); and 4) in

18 any stay and/or appeals papers Defendant-Intervenors may file regarding Plaintiffs’ attempt to 19 discover internal campaign strategy documents and/or nonpublic and/or anonymous 20 communications related to Proposition 8. These objections are based, inter alia, on relevance, 21 burden, and First Amendment privilege grounds. 22 23 3. More specifically, Schubert Flint shares in Defendant-Intervenors’ objection that 24 Plaintiffs’ requests as set forth in the Subpoena violate protected First Amendment rights and

25 therefore incorporates all of Defendant-Intervenors’ First Amendment arguments and objects on 26 those grounds to producing anything other than the public documents that have already been 27 provided to our client, Protect Marriage.com, for production to Plaintiffs. The incorporated 28 1 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page4 of 16

1 objections referenced above also include but are not limited to the objections made by Defendant-

2 Intervenors to producing drafts and other nonpublic pre-decisional documents or communications 3 associated with preparing final documents or communications regarding Proposition 8 that were 4 actually disseminated to the electorate and objections to producing documents and information 5 postdating the passage of Proposition 8 in November 2008. 6 7 4. Schubert Flint objects to these Requests as vague, ambiguous, and/or unduly 8 burdensome to the extent that the terms “public” and “third-party” are not defined and/or limited in

9 any way, and taken at face value would encompass all communications Schubert Flint may have

10 had with any “third party”—even a single individual, whether or not a California voter—bearing 11 any relationship to Proposition 8 whatsoever. Such documents include, but are not limited to, 12 communications with individual donors, volunteers, or voters; communications with political 13 strategists and other agents or contractors of Defendant-Intervenors; and communications with 14 15 friends, colleagues, and casual acquaintances. Moreover, Plaintiffs seek these communications 16 regardless of whether they relate to the public understanding of or motivation for enacting

17 Proposition 8. This presents not only First Amendment concerns, but also creates an undue burden

18 on Schubert Flint in attempting to gather, review, and produce all such communications. 19 5. Schubert Flint objects to the Subpoena on the grounds that it seeks production of 20 documents which are not legally relevant to any claims or defenses in the litigation and are not 21 reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 22 23 26(b)(1). 24 6. Schubert Flint objects to the Subpoena on the grounds that it imposes undue burden and

25 expense in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c) including but not limited to requiring Schubert Flint to 26 produce electronically-stored information (“ESI”) that is not reasonably accessible and/or the 27 production of which would entail substantial cost. To the extent Schubert Flint is required to 28 2 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page5 of 16

1 produce documents that are not reasonably accessible and/or is required to undertake unduly

2 burdensome measures in response to the Subpoena, the cost of any production (including but not 3 limited to any electronic media restoration, processing, scanning, exporting, storage, etc.) would be 4 borne by Plaintiffs. 5 7. Schubert Flint objects to the Subpoena to the extent that it seeks information and 6 7 documents that: are already in Plaintiffs’ possession; are duplicative of documents already 8 produced by Defendant-Intervenors; or are as equally available to Plaintiffs from other sources that

9 are more convenient, less burdensome, and/or less expensive. Schubert Flint further objects to the

10 Subpoena to the extent it purports to place an obligation on Schubert Flint to produce documents 11 and information from entities and/or individuals who are not within Schubert Flint’s custody and 12 control in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C)(ii). 13 8. Schubert Flint objects to the Subpoena to the extent it requires disclosing confidential 14 15 research and proprietary information. 16 9. Schubert Flint objects to the Subpoena to the extent it calls for the production of

17 documents or information protected from disclosure by any claim of privilege, including but not

18 limited to the attorney-client privilege, the work-product doctrine, and the right to privacy. While 19 Schubert Flint does not intend to produce any such privileged or protected documents or 20 information, should any inadvertent disclosure occur, it shall not be deemed a waiver of any 21 privilege. 22 23 10. Schubert Flint objects to the Subpoena, and to the definitions and instructions included 24 therewith, to the extent that it purports to impose upon Schubert Flint obligations broader than, or

25 inconsistent with, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules and Orders of this Court, 26 or the Local Rules and Order of the District Court for the Northern District of California where this 27 action is pending. 28 3 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page6 of 16

1 11. Schubert Flint objects to the Subpoena, and to the definitions and instructions included

2 therewith, to the extent that it calls for the production of documents or information beyond what is 3 authorized by the order of October 1, 2009 (Doc # 214) issued by the District Court for the 4 Northern District of California in this case. 5 Subject to and without waiving any of the foregoing General Objections, which are hereby 6 7 incorporated into each response given below, Schubert Flint is answering these Requests in 8 substance to the extent practicable and reasonable under the present circumstances, as stated

9 below. Schubert Flint hereby objects and responds to the individual Requests as follows: 10 SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES 11 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 1: 12

13 All documents, including without limitation literature, pamphlets, flyers, direct mail, advertisements, emails, text messages, press releases, or other materials that you distributed to 14 voters, donors, potential donors, or members of the media regarding Proposition 8. 15

16 RESPONSE:

17 Shubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response 18 to this Request. Schubert Flint objects to this Request as calling for irrelevant documents and 19 documents privileged from disclosure under the First Amendment. Schubert Flint further 20 specifically objects to this Request to the extent it calls for the production of documents and 21 22 information to “donors” or “potential donors.” Schubert Flint further specifically objects to this 23 Request to the extent it calls for production of documents and information that are not relevant

24 and/or protected by the First Amendment—including documents not publically distributed. As

25 noted above, Schubert Flint incorporates by reference the objections and explanations set forth by 26 Defendant-Intervenors in the briefing on their Motion for a Protective Order and any stay and/or 27 appeal papers they may file. 28 4 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page7 of 16

1 Subject to and without waiving any objection, and without conceding the relevancy of any

2 materials being produced in response to this Request, Schubert Flint has already provided to 3 Defendant-Intervenors for production to Plaintiffs final copies of public communications 4 responsive to this Request that were distributed to and or available to the public. 5

6 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 2: 7 All versions of any internet advertisement relating to Proposition 8 that you had any involvement 8 in producing, creating or distributing. 9

10 RESPONSE: 11 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response 12 to this Request. Schubert Flint objects to this Request as calling for irrelevant documents and 13 documents privileged from disclosure under the First Amendment. Schubert Flint objects to 14 15 producing drafts of final public communications, which would include, e.g., nonpublic versions of 16 Internet advertisements relating to Proposition 8 that were never actually posted on the Internet.

17 Schubert Flint objects to this Request to the extent it calls for production of documents not

18 available to the public (e.g., Internet communications of limited or invite-only distribution). 19 Schubert Flint also specifically objects to this Request to the extent it calls for the production of 20 material from the Internet that is not uniquely within Schubert Flint’s custody or control in 21 violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C)(i). To the extent there were or are Internet advertisements 22 23 related to Proposition 8 posted on the Internet that information is as equally available to Plaintiffs 24 as it is to Schubert Flint and thus is not the proper subject of discovery to Schubert Flint.

25 Subject to and without waiving these objections, and without conceding the relevancy of 26 any materials being produced in response to this Request, Schubert Flint has already provided to 27 28 5 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page8 of 16

1 Defendant-Intervenors for production to Plaintiffs final versions of internet advertisements posted

2 on the Internet that Schubert Flint had involvement in producing, creating, or distributing. 3

4 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 3:

5 All versions of any television advertisement relating to Proposition 8 that you had any

6 involvement in producing creating, or distributing. 7

8 RESPONSE:

9 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response

10 to this Request. Schubert Flint objects to this Request as calling for irrelevant documents and 11 documents privileged from disclosure under the First Amendment. Schubert Flint objects to 12 producing drafts of final public communications, which would include nonpublic versions of 13 television advertisements relating to Proposition 8 that were never actually aired. Schubert Flint 14 15 objects to this Request to the extent it calls for production of documents not available to the public. 16 Schubert Flint also specifically objects to this Request to the extent it calls for the production of

17 material not uniquely within Schubert Flint’s custody or control in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P.

18 26(b)(2)(C)(i). 19 Subject to and without waiving these objections, and without conceding the relevancy of 20 any materials being produced in response to this Request, Schubert Flint has already provided to 21 Defendant-Intervenors for production to Plaintiffs final versions of any television advertisements 22 23 that Schubert Flint had any involvement in creating, producing, or distributing and that were 24 actually aired on television.

25 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 4: 26

27 All versions of any radio advertisement relating to Proposition 8 that you had any involvement in

28 producing, creating, or distributing. 6 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page9 of 16

1 RESPONSE: 2 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response 3 4 to this Request. Schubert Flint objects to this Request as calling for irrelevant documents and

5 documents privileged from disclosure under the First Amendment. Schubert Flint objects to

6 producing drafts of final public communications, which would include nonpublic versions of radio 7 advertisements relating to Proposition 8 that were never actually aired. Schubert Flint objects to 8 this Request to the extent it calls for production of documents not available to the public. Schubert 9 Flint also specifically objects to this Request to the extent it calls for the production of material not 10 11 uniquely within Schubert Flint’s custody or control in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C)(i). 12 Subject to and without waiving these objections, and without conceding the relevancy of

13 any materials being produced in response to this Request, Schubert Flint has already provided to

14 Defendant-Intervenors for production to Plaintiffs final versions of radio advertisements that 15 Schubert Flint had involvement in creating, producing, or distributing that were actually aired on 16 the radio. 17

18 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 5: 19 All plans, schematics, and versions of the websites relating to Proposition 8 that you hosted, paid 20 for, designed, or sponsored. 21

22 RESPONSE:

23 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response 24 to this Request. Schubert Flint objects to this Request as calling for irrelevant documents and 25 documents privileged from disclosure under the First Amendment. Schubert Flint objects to 26 producing drafts of final public communications, which would include nonpublic versions of 27 28 7 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page10 of 16

1 websites relating to Proposition 8 that were never actually accessible by the public. Schubert Flint

2 objects to this Request to the extent it calls for production of documents not available to the public. 3 Subject to and without waiving these objections, and without conceding the relevancy of 4 any materials being produced in response to this Request, Schubert Flint has already provided to 5 Defendant-Intervenors for production to Plaintiffs final versions of Internet pages from websites 6 7 related to Proposition 8 that Schubert Flint hosted, paid or, designed, or sponsored. 8 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.6: 9 All documents you prepared for use in communicating with voters, donors, potential donors, or 10 members of the media, including but not limited to speeches, scripts, talking points, articles, notes, 11 and automated telemarketing phone calls. 12 13 RESPONSE: 14 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response 15 to this Request. Schubert Flint objects to this Request as calling for irrelevant documents and 16 17 documents privileged from disclosure under the First Amendment. Schubert Flint objects to this 18 Request as calling for confidential and proprietary information. As written, this Request on its

19 face is not even limited to the subject matter of this litigation, Proposition 8. Schubert Flint also 20 objects to this Request to the extent it calls for drafts of final public communications, which would 21 include nonpublic versions of documents relating to Proposition 8 that were never actually 22 distributed or available to the public. 23 Subject to and without waiving these objections, and without conceding the relevancy of 24 25 any materials being produced in response to this Request, Schubert Flint has already provided to

26 Defendant-Intervenors for production to Plaintiffs final versions of documents responsive to this

27 Request that are outside the scope of the stated objections. 28

8 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page11 of 16

1 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.7: 2 All documents constituting postings related to Proposition 8 that were made by you on social networking websites, including but not limited to Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter. 3

4 RESPONSE: 5

6 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response

7 to this Request. Schubert Flint objects to this Request as calling for irrelevant documents and

8 documents privileged from disclosure under the First Amendment. Schubert Flint objects to this 9 Request to the extent it calls for production of documents not available to the public. Schubert 10 Flint further specifically objects to this Request to the extent it purports to reach the nonpublic 11 communications and postings of individual employees of Schubert Flint on their personal (as 12 13 opposed to postings publicly accessible by any member of the electorate at large) social- 14 networking sites. While Schubert Flint does not, at this time, believe that any such postings exist,

15 were such postings to exist Schubert Flint would object to producing them, as this would violate

16 the First Amendment rights of Schubert Flint and its employees and call for information that is 17 entirely irrelevant to any issue in this matter. Thus, to the extent any such postings do exist, 18 Schubert Flint objects to their production. 19 Subject to and without waiving these objections, and without conceding the relevancy of 20 21 any materials being produced in response to this Request, Schubert Flint has already provided to 22 Defendant-Intervenors for production to Plaintiffs postings on public social networking sites

23 maintained for the Yes on 8 campaign. 24

25 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.8: 26 All versions of any documents that reflect communications relating to Proposition 8 between 27 you and any third party, including, without limitation, emails between you and Protect Marriage, 28 9 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page12 of 16

1 documents you provided to Protect Marriage, and communications between you and members of 2 the media.

3 RESPONSE: 4 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response 5 to this Request. Schubert Flint objects to this Request as calling for irrelevant documents and 6 7 documents privileged from disclosure under the First Amendment. Schubert Flint objects to this 8 Request to the extent it calls for production of documents not available to the public. Schubert

9 Flint objects to producing drafts of final public communications, which would include nonpublic

10 versions of communications relating to Proposition 8 that were never available to the public. 11 Schubert Flint objects to the phrase “any third party” as vague, ambiguous, not defined, and not 12 reasonably narrowed. Schubert Flint further notes that when a similarly broad request was made to 13 Defendant-Intervenors, the Court in which this action is pending found the request to be too broad 14 15 and Defendant-Intervenors’ undue burden objections well-taken. Plaintiffs were directed “to 16 revise request no 8 to target those communications most likely to be relevant to the factual issues

17 identified by plaintiffs.” Doc. # 214 at 16. No such attempt to redraft the Request being 18 propounded on Schubert Flint has been made. On its face, this Request appears to be seeking any 19 communication related to Proposition 8 in any way, whether or not it is related to a public 20 communication or was actually available to the public. This Request appears to include, for 21 example: any and all communications Schubert Flint may have had with other vendors, 22 23 consultants, donors, members, friends, associates, or other correspondents. Such a broad request is 24 objectionable on First Amendment grounds and because of the undue burden and expense it would

25 impose on Schubert Flint to gather, review, log and/or produce all responsive materials, the 26 overwhelming majority of which are irrelevant to any issue in dispute in this case in violation of 27 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C)(iii) and 45(c). 28 10 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page13 of 16

1 Based on the objections asserted above, Schubert Flint has no additional documents to

2 produce at this time. 3 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 9: 4 Documents sufficient to show the title of everyone employed by you from January 1, 2006 to 5 December 31, 2008, including but not limited to organizational charts. 6 7 RESPONSE:

8 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response 9 to this Request. Schubert Flint objects to this Request to the extent it seeks information pre-dating 10 its involvement in the Proposition 8 campaign. Schubert Flint further objects to this Request as 11 overly broad and as calling for irrelevant information. Not everyone employed by Schubert Flint 12 13 worked on the Proposition 8 campaign nor did everyone who did work on the campaign have 14 substantive involvement or decisionmaking authority related to the campaign; the identity of such

15 employees is therefore irrelevant.

16 Subject to and without waiving these objections, Schubert Flint is in the process of 17 determining whether there are any reasonably accessible, non-privileged or non-confidential 18 documents that already exist that can be produced in response to this Request. 19

20 21 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 10:

22 All documents reflecting public media coverage of Proposition 8 referring or related to your

23 organization. 24 RESPONSE: 25 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response 26 to this Request. Schubert Flint further specifically objects to this Request to the extent it purports 27 to call for the production of publicly available information that is not uniquely within Schubert 28 11 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page14 of 16

1 Flint’s custody and control and is as readily available to Plaintiffs as it is to Schubert Flint. See

2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C)(i). To the extent Plaintiffs wish to review the public media coverage of 3 Proposition 8, they can access such materials just as easily as Schubert Flint. Schubert Flint 4 further objects to this Request to the extent it calls for collections, compilations, summaries, or 5 analysis of public media coverage that may have been created by Schubert Flint for personal, 6 7 political, strategic, or other reasons. 8 Subject to and without waiving these objections, and without conceding the legal relevancy

9 of such materials, Schubert Flint has already provided to Defendant-Intervenors for production to

10 Plaintiffs documents created by Schubert Flint and produced to the media for dissemination to the 11 public. 12

13 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11:

14 All documents constituting, reflecting, or referring to coordination or cooperation among 15 organizations and/or individuals supporting the passage of Proposition 8. 16 RESPONSE: 17 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response 18 19 to this Request. In particular, Schubert Flint objects to this Request to the extent it calls for 20 irrelevant documents and documents protected from disclosure under the First Amendment.

21 Schubert Flint further objects to this Request as overly broad and unduly burdensome. 22

23 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 12:

24 All minutes or other memorializations for meetings in which you participated concerning

25 Proposition 8.

26 RESPONSE: 27 28 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response 12 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page15 of 16

1 to this Request. In particular, Schubert Flint objects to this Request to the extent it calls for

2 irrelevant documents and documents protected from disclosure under the First Amendment. 3 Schubert Flint further objects to this Request as overly broad and unduly burdensome. The term 4 “meetings” is undefined. As the campaign manager for Protect Marriage.com, staff for Schubert 5 Flint engaged in thousands of discussions, conferences, gatherings, etc., which may or may not 6 7 constitute a “meeting” covered by this Request. Thus, this Request read literally could require the 8 production of scores of notes, emails, etc. bearing even the remotest relationship to Proposition 8

9 whether or not actually related to Plaintiffs’ purported interests in seeking such discovery.

10 Subject to these objections, Schubert Flint has no documents to produce at this time. 11

12 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 13:

13 Documents sufficient to show all expenditures by you and payments to you in connection with

14 Proposition 8. 15

16 RESPONSE: 17 Schubert Flint reiterates its General Objections as if specifically set forth below in response to this 18 19 Request. In particular, Schubert Flint objects to this Request to the extent it calls for irrelevant 20 documents and documents protected from disclosure under the First Amendment. Schubert Flint

21 further objects to this Request as impermissibly seeking private and/or proprietary information. The 22 amount of expenditures made or payments received by Schubert Flint in connection with Proposition 23 8 are irrelevant to any claim or defense in this action and is not information designed to lead to the 24 discovery of admissible evidence. 25 Subject to these objections, Schubert Flint has no additional documents to produce at this 26 27 time.

28 13 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document329-6 Filed12/30/09 Page16 of 16

1 October 7, 2009

2 /s/ Robert H. Tyler______

3 ADVOCATES FOR FAITH AND FREEDOMRobert H. Tyler (CA Bar No. 179572) 4 [email protected] Jennifer L. Monk (CA Bar No. 245512) 5 [email protected] 24910 Las Brisas Road, Suite 110 6 Murrieta, California 92562 Telephone:951-3-4-7583; Facsimile: 951-600-4996 7 8 Attorneys for Schubert Flint Public Affairs, Inc. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 14 SCHUBERT FLINT’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW