DOCSLIB.ORG

The Potential of Fluorides and Sealants to Deal with Problems of Dental Decay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Potential of Fluorides and Sealants to Deal with Problems of Dental Decay The potential of fluorides and sealants to deal with problems of dental decay Herschel S. Horowitz, DDS, MPH The prevalence of oral diseases in many parts of the The prospects for reducing dental decay by altering world is staggering. 1 Consequently, many countries the dietary habits of the public are equally unpromis- have, or are developing, a large cadre of professional and ing. ~’~a Diets have changed radically within the last 50 auxiliary personnel trained to deliver dental services. years in the U. S., as they surely have in other countires. The education of these persons has tended to stress skills More and more sugar is hidden in commercially pre- for reconstructing teeth and their supporting tissues after pared foods and not consciously taken from the sugar disease has occurred; teachers in most dental schools bowl. Sugar obviously plays a pervasive role in today’s seldom emphasize preventive methods. lifestyle. Getting people to change their dietary practices The potential to be able to prevent dental caries as a for the purpose of improving oral health is a difficult major oral health problem is great because, of all oral task. ~’~4 However, dental benefits are readily apparent diseases, dental caries is at present the most nearly in persons who practice dietary control of sugar, such as preventable. Three factors must be present for dental those with hereditary fructose intolerance. Although the caries to occur: (1) a susceptible host--inasmuch as any likelihood of success from a public health aspect is small, tooth will develop caries if challenged sufficiently, all restricting the frequent ingestion of sugars should con- persons with teeth must be considered susceptible; (2) tinue to be advocated. the presence in dental plaque of bacteria that can pro- Today, the most feasible way to prevent dental caries duce acids which attack the teeth; and (3) a diet suitable is to increase the tooth’s resistance to decay. The best for2’3 bacterial fermentation. individual and public health defense against dental decay Efforts to prevent dental caries have focused upon is the proper use of fluorides. But, the proper use of attempts to: (1) increase the resistance of teeth with fluorides does not preclude the need for regular dental various4-9 fluorides and adhesive pit and fissure sealants; care or educating the public about good oral hygiene (2) lower the number or reduce the cariogenic activity and dietary practices. bacteria in contact with the teeth by mechanical means Until about 10 years ago, most dental experts believed or with chemical agents; ~°-13 and (3) modify dietary that fluorides worked principally by increasing the re- practices by urging people to eat sweets, cookies and sistance of enamel to acids produced in dental plaque soft~4-~n drinks less frequently. by bacteria, es More recent research clearly shows that Dental plaque adheres tenaciously to teeth, ~7-~ but it other actions of fluoride, such as remineralization of can be removed mechanically by toothbrushing and, initial or precarious lesions and a host of antimicrobial from areas between the teeth, by the use of dental floss effects,~-~ are also important. and other cleaning devices. School-based studies, how- The mechanisms by which fluorides prevent dental ever, have shown that efforts to control plaque by daily, decay probably vary, depending upon the agent used, supervised toothbrushing and flossing for periods up to its route of administration, its concentration and fre- three years have failed to reduce the incidence of dental quency of use, and the vehicle used to deliver it. a9 More caries in children, z°’2~ Most persons cannot achieve, with than one mechanism may operate simultaneously. Per- current mechanical methods, the level of oral cleanliness haps the most important element is the frequent provi- necessary to prevent dental caries in approximal and sion=~ of low concentrations of fluoride to dental plaque. fissured tooth surfaces. It is unrealistic to believe that we can control dental caries as a public health problem Community Water Fluoridation simply by urging people to remove dental plaque fastid- Fluoride compounds are among the most common iously each day. components of the earth’s crust. Nearly all natural water 286 FLUORIDES,SEALANTS & DENTALDECAY: Horowitz sources contain a measurable quantity, which varies the average, community fluoridation currently costs according to the amount and solubility of the fluoride in about~3’34 20 ¢ per person per year to operate in the U.S. adjacent mineral deposits. Only distilled water and un- In addition, the entire community benefits from the contaminated rain and snow are completely free of procedure, regardless of socioeconomic level, educa- fluoride. tional achievement, individual motivation, or the avail- Many common foods also contain appreciable ability of dentists. No cooperative effort or direct action amounts of fluoride. Fish and tea are particularly rich need be taken by those who will benefit. Moreover, the sources. Fluoride also is found in fowl and other meats improvement in dental health continues for life if con- and in such cereals as rye, wheat, and rice. In fact, sumption of fluoridated water continues, a~’~9 A recent fluoride is present in so many foods that some is prob- report shows that lifelong consumption of fluoridated ably ingested at every meal. water also significantly lowers the prevalence of root Because naturally occurring water-borne fluoride is surface~° caries in older persons. not always present in a concentration sufficient to pro- Although the benefits of community fluoridation are duce dental benefits, the natural level should be ad- truly impressive, the procedure is not a panacea for justed. The process of adjusting the amount of fluoride dental caries. Unfortunately, its implementation is lim- in a community’s water to an optimal concentration for ited to areas with central water supplies. Moreover, other the prevention of dental caries is known as community methods of preventing decay are still necessary for par- water fluoridation. Because the original water is likely to ticularly susceptible persons living in fluoridated com- contain some fluoride already, a key word in this defi- munities, and obviously, the use of fluoridated water is nition is adjustment. not a license for unrestricted consumption of confections Fluoridation of community water supplies is the least between meals or for abandoning oral hygiene proce- expensive and most effective way to provide fluoride to dures. a°-32 large groups of people, Optimal adjustment of the Published estimates show that 185 million persons fluoride concentration of community water supplies living in 6,470 communities in 40 countries drink water should be the foundation for all programs of dental with an optimally adjusted fluoride concentration. ~1 An- health because this public health method is nearly ideal. other 39 million persons living in 4,096 communities in First and foremost, community fluoridation is highly 39 countries consume drinking water with naturally 3~’~4 effective. Hundreds of studies done throughout the occurring amounts of fluoride at optimal or greater world have shown that children who consume optimally concentrations. Nineteen of these 39 countries also have fluoridated water from birth have from 50-70% less communities with controlled fluoridation. Thus, there dental decay than they would have experienced without are at least 60 countries in the world with adjusted or fluoridation. As an example of the benefits produced natural fluoridation, serving more than 10,000 commun- after fluoridation, Table I shows comparative DMFtooth ities and 224 million persons. ~1 The Republic of Ireland scores for 12- to 16-year-old children in Grand Rapids, implemented legislation for national fluoridation in the MI before and after 15 years of community water fluor- early 1960s. Approximately 112 million U.S. citizens idation. (one-half the total population) live in communities served by fluoridated water supplies or by water that Table 1. Average number of DMFteeth in 12- to 16-year-old contains optimal or greater concentrations of fluoride as children in Grand Rapids before and after 15 years of com- a natural constituent. The municipal water supplies in munity water fluoridation. Hong Kong and Singapore are fluoridated. Thirty million DMFTeeth persons in 85 communities in the Soviet Union consume fluoridated water. 1944-45 1959 Abundant data show that fluoridated water not only Before After 15 Percentage acts systemically during tooth formation to produce Age fluoridation years difference enamel more resistant to dental caries but also acts 12 8.07 3.47 57.0 directly as a topically applied agent. Therefore, the pro- 13 9.73 3.58 63.2 cedure benefits both children and adults. 14 10.94 5.38 50.8 Studies of the effects of fluoridation in young children 15 12.48 6.22 50.2 16 13.50 7.03 47.9 prove that the procedure effectively reduces the preva- lence42-44 of dental caries in primary teeth by about 40%. Marthaler has shown that consumption of fluoridated Consumption of fluoridated water is eminently water should begin at birth to provide maximal protec- safe. 3a’a4 No other health measure has been analyzed tion44 to primary teeth. more critically than the fluoridation of city water sup- Many studies have confirmed the finding that fluori- plies. The procedure is also inexpensive and greatly dation reduces the prevalence of dental caries in per- reduces the per capita costs of dental treatment. 3s-37 On manent teeth by an average of about 60%.aa-a~ However, PEDIATRICDENTISTRY:Volume 4, Number 4 287 Percent Inhibition the benefits are not uniformly conferred to all tooth (DMFteeth) surfaces. Approximal and other smooth tooth surfaces are protected to a far greater extent than are pit and 4+-+6 fissure surfaces. Using data from several studies, 60- Marthaler 44 has shown rather conclusively that maximal caries protection to permanent teeth occurs only when children begin to consume water at birth.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Effective Use of Fluorides in Public Health
    The effective use of fluorides in public health Sheila Jones,1 Brian A. Burt,2 Poul Erik Petersen,3 & Michael A. Lennon4 Abstract Dental caries remain a public health problem for many developing countries and for underprivileged populations in developed countries. This paper outlines the historical development of public health approaches to the use of fluoride and comments on their effectiveness. Early research and development was concerned with waterborne fluorides, both naturally occurring and added, and their effects on the prevalence and incidence of dental caries and dental fluorosis. In the latter half of the 20th century, the focus of research was on fluoride toothpastes and mouth rinses. More recently, systematic reviews summarizing these extensive databases have indicated that water fluoridation and fluoride toothpastes both substantially reduce the prevalence and incidence of dental caries. We present four case studies that illustrate the use of fluoride in modern public health practice, focusing on: recent water fluoridation schemes in California, USA; salt fluoridation in Jamaica; milk fluoridation in Chile; and the development of “affordable” fluoride toothpastes in Indonesia. Common themes are the concern to reduce demands for compliance with fluoride regimes that rely upon action by individuals and their families, and the issue of cost. We recommend that a community should use no more than one systemic fluoride (i.e. water or salt or milk fluoridation) combined with the use of fluoride toothpastes, and that the prevalence of dental fluorosis should be monitored in order to detect increases in or higher-than-acceptable levels. Keywords Fluorides/therapeutic use; Fluorides, Topical/therapeutic use; Dental caries/prevention and control; Fluoridation; Water supply; Milk; Sodium chloride, Dietary; Toothpaste/therapeutic use; Case reports; Meta-analysis; Review literature; United States; Jamaica; Chile; Indonesia (source: MeSH, NLM).
    [Show full text]
  • Should We Use Milk Fluoridation? a Review1 RODRIGOMARI~~O~
    Should We Use Milk Fluoridation? A Review1 RODRIGOMARI~~O~ This article presents the argument that becauseof several demonsfrafed advantages, milk fluoridation provides a valid alternative to water fluoridafion when the latter is not possible. Extensive literature describing study of fl uoride compounds adminisfered with calcium-rich food, as well as clinical trials and laborafo y experimen fs with fluoridated milk, have dem- onstrated its effectiveness in caries prevention. The main criticisms of milk fluoridation are decreased bioavailabilify of the fluoride, the cost and adminisfrafive burden involved, and (in some cases) lack of sound clinical conclusions regarding ifs preventive efficacy. These S criticisms are reviewed in fhe light of evidence now available. he World Health Organization has Indeed, oral health surveys have shown T recommended specific goals for oral that in most countries of the Americas health by the year 2000 (I). Among other about 95% of the population has a history things, these goals assert that the de- of dental caries (2). If countries continue cayed, missing, and filled teeth index to rely on programs based on dental caries (DMFT)3 at 12 years of age should be 3 treatment rather than prevention, we or less. In 1990, only 5 of 38 countries cannot expect major improvements in this and territories in Latin America and the picture, especially since there are many English-speaking Caribbean (the Baha- places where a significant part of the mas, Cuba, Dominica, Guyana, and Saint population lacks access to reguIar oral Lucia) had such a DMFT index, while 8 health care. Clearly, a different approach countries had DMFT indices exceeding to the problem must be found.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Water Fluoridation” October 1, 2010 November 7, 2014
    Alberta Health, Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health Notice to the reader on “A Review of Water Fluoridation” October 1, 2010 November 7, 2014 November 7, 2014 Notice to the reader Re: A Review of Water Fluoridation, October 1, 2010 report This report is a compilation of existing resources, materials and research that highlight key aspects of the water fluoridation debate. It was developed as a support to assist Medical Officers of Health in Alberta in dealing with queries on fluoridation. While not written for the public, this report is now widely available to help anyone interested to better understand the issue and to provide answers to questions about fluoridation. The reader must be aware that this report is not drafted as a scientific review article for publication although references are made to previous systematic reviews and their findings. It is also important to note that specific references for quoted material are given in the text at the time they are used. Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Alberta Health © 2014 Government of Alberta PREPARED BY DR. STEVEN K. PATTERSON A Review of Water Fluoridation S UBMITTED: O CTOBER 1, 2010 A Review of Water Fluoridation Dr. Steven Patterson A Table of Contents Page Number Executive summary 3 Introduction/Background 6 Importance of oral health Scope of dental disease in Alberta/Canada 7 Dental disease in Alberta Dental disease in Canada Mechanism of fluoride’s action 12 Benefits of water fluoridation Dental fluorosis 17 Safety of water fluoridation Canadian Health Measure Survey 2007-2009 Fluorosis data from Alberta dental surveys Population vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review on the Effects of Water Fluoridation on the Human Health
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 5-24-2019 Literature Review on the Effects of Water Fluoridation on the Human Health Diana Abdeljawad Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Abdeljawad, Diana, "Literature Review on the Effects of Water Fluoridation on the Human Health" (2019). University Honors Theses. Paper 708. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.725 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Literature Review on the Effects of Water Fluoridation on the Human Health by Diana Abdeljawad An undergraduate honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in University Honors and Science/Chemistry Thesis Adviser Bradley Buckley, PhD Portland State University 2019 LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE EFFECTS OF WATER FLUORIDATION ON THE HUMAN HEALTH 2 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................... 3 Background information.......................................................................................... 4-6 Fluoride.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • D3G DISPATCH News About Developmental Dental Defects (D3s), the D3 Group, and the Chalky Teeth Campaign
    THE D3 GROUP ISSUE #13 MARCH 2020 D3G DISPATCH News about Developmental Dental Defects (D3s), The D3 Group, and the Chalky Teeth Campaign. COMMENT FROM THE CUSP: Going viral Commiserations to everyone disrupted by the pandemic crisis, and hallelujah to science and technology for providing humanity an unprecedentedly strong path to recovery. Just 3 weeks ago, a colleague praised D3G's recent progress as "going viral"– not knowing the next day we'd be in the midst of a COVID-19 scare that has consumed life down under since. With D3G now affected by the bad connotation of improvement") emerge, usually directed at authors "going viral", this first issue of 2020 relays a mixture of and/or reviewing. It seems appropriate that D3G use ups, downs and uncertainties – unfortunately the April CE it's clinico-scientific strengths to improve both ends event in Toronto has been postponed and the October of the system and that this will be a great topic for Symposium remains on track but uncertainly so. On the our upcoming symposium. bright side we share some wonderful examples of "D3 Take care, and do the world a favour by communicating love", provide further reasons to "think beyond MIH" the importance of science! and to communicate translationally, and dip a cautious toe into the murky waters of research publication quality. Unsurprisingly the latter is frequently discussed amongst D3-Mike | Mike Hubbard D3ers and diverse grumbles (aka "opportunities for D3G Founder-Director NEWS: Feel the D3 love :-) Given growing tensions with COVID-19, we're thrilled the first 3 months of 2020 delivered a wonderful triad of "feel the D3 love" moments that'll surely help us through this challenge and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Soares, R. Et Al
    Original Article DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23594.9758 Assessment of Enamel Remineralisation After Treatment with Four Different Dentistry Section Remineralising Agents: A Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Study RENITA SOARES1, IDA DE NORONHA DE ATAIDE2, MARINA FERNANDES3, RAJAN LAMBOR4 ABSTRACT these groups were remineralised using the four remineralising Introduction: Decades of research has helped to increase our agents. The treated groups were subjected to pH cycling over a knowledge of dental caries and reduce its prevalence. However, period of 30 days. This was followed by assessment of surface according to World Oral Health report, dental caries still remains microhardness and SEM for qualitative evaluation of surface a major dental disease. Fluoride therapy has been utilised in changes. The results were analysed by One-Way Analysis Of a big way to halt caries progression, but has been met with Variance (ANOVA). Multiple comparisons between groups were limitations. This has paved the way for the development of performed by paired t-test and post-hoc Tukey test. newer preventive agents that can function as an adjunct to Results: The results of the study revealed that remineralisation of fluoride or independent of it. enamel was the highest in samples of Group E (Self assembling Aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the ability peptide P11-4) followed by Group B (CPP-ACPF), Group C (BAG) of Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate and Group D (fluoride enhanced HA gel). There was a significant Fluoride (CPP ACPF), Bioactive Glass (BAG), fluoride enhanced difference (p<0.05) in the remineralising ability between the self assembling peptide P -4 group and BAG and fluoride Hydroxyapatite (HA) gel and self-assembling peptide P11-4 to 11 remineralise artificial carious lesions in enamel in vitro using enhanced HA gel group.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Fluoridation: a Community Toolkit
    Water Fluoridation: A Community Toolkit Community Water Fluoridation Toolkit INTRODUCTION Oral health is important throughout a person’s life. The Missouri Coalition for Oral Health supports water fluoridation because it is one of the most cost-effective strategies for communities to improve the oral health of their residents. Fluoride exists naturally in virtually all water supplies. “Fluoridation” is simply adjusting fluoride to the optimal level that protects teeth from decay. Studies show that fluoridation reduces tooth decay and benefits people of all ages and income groups. Two studies released in 2010 strengthened the already substantial evidence that fluoridated water prevents cavities. As an oral health advocate, the Coalition’s “Water Fluoridation: A Community Toolkit” is your resource on the health benefits, cost savings and media outreach on fluoridation. The Coalition encourages you to use the toolkit as you talk with friends, colleagues and opinion leaders within your community about community water fluoridation. For more information, visit us at www.oralhealthmissouri.org or 573.635.5570. This toolkit is an adaptation of a document originally published by the Michigan Oral Health Coalition. The Missouri Coalition for Oral Health gratefully acknowledges their generosity in sharing these valuable materials. Funding for this project was provided in part by the Health Care Foundation of Greater Kansas City, the Missouri Foundation for Health, and the REACH Healthcare Foundation. www.oralhealthmissouri.org Community Water Fluoridation
    [Show full text]
  • Fluoride Treatment in Osteoporosis Pauline Pitt and Hedley Berry King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
    Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.67.786.323 on 1 April 1991. Downloaded from Postgrad Med J (1991) 67, 323 - 326 i) The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 1991 Leading Article Fluoride treatment in osteoporosis Pauline Pitt and Hedley Berry King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK Introduction The use offluoride for the treatment ofestablished Fluoride in clinical practice vertebral osteoporosis in adults with the sympto- matic crush fracture syndrome is approved for use Fluoride is known to stimulate osteoblasts in in 8 European countries.' This treatment was culture." Its use has been associated with increase suggested by the low prevalence of osteoporosis in in alkaline phosphatase activity and it stimulates some areas where the drinking water contained both collagen synthesis and calcium deposition." moderately high concentrations of fluoride` and High concentrations may exert a toxic effect on by the enormously increased bone density charac- osteoblast function.'2 teristic of fluorosis.5 At least 4 studies have been carried out to assess There now exists a wealth of evidence and some the long-term effect offluoride treatment on spinal controversy regarding the use of fluoride, and this bone mass. Some ofthe results are conflicting. Two article addresses the main issues involved. prospective controlled trials have been carried out and recently reviewed in detail.' One in France used a daily dose of 50 mg for 2 years and the other copyright. Pharmacokinetics in the USA used a high-dose regimen of 60
    [Show full text]
  • Water Fluoridation and the Environment: Current Perspective in the United States
    Water Fluoridation and the Environment: Current Perspective in the United States HOWARD F. POLLICK, BDS, MPH Evidence of water fluoridation’s effects on plants, ani­ as in toothpaste, have significantly reduced the preva­ mals, and humans is considered based on reviews by sci­ lence of dental caries in the United States.1 entific groups and individual communities, including Early investigations into the physiologic effects of flu­ Fort Collins, CO, Port Angeles, WA, and Tacoma-Pierce oride in drinking water predated the first community County, WA. The potential for corrosion of pipes and field trials.4–7 Since 1950, opponents of fluoridation the use of fluoridation chemicals, particularly fluoro­ have claimed it increases the risks for cancer, Down’s silicic acid, are considered, as is the debate about syndrome, heart disease, osteoporosis and bone frac­ whether fluoridation increases lead in water, with the conclusion that there is no such increase. The argu­ ture, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, low intelli­ ments of anti-fluoridationists and fluoridation propo­ gence, Alzheimer disease, allergic reactions, and other nents are examined with respect to the politics of the health conditions.8 The safety and effectiveness of water issue. Key words: fluoridation; environment; toxicology. fluoridation have been re-evaluated frequently, and no credible evidence supports an association between INT J OCCUP ENVIRON HEALTH 2004;10:343–350 fluoridation and any of these conditions.9,10 The Environment rior to 1945, epidemiologic and laboratory studies confirmed the association between the environ­ Environmental concerns have been investigated in liter­ ment (naturally-occurring fluoride in water sup­ ature reviews for the Tacoma–Pierce County Health P 1 11 plies) and the health and cosmetic appearance of teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Water Fluoridation Fact Sheet
    Community Water Fluoridation Tooth decay is one of the Safe most common chronic • The safety and benefits of fluoride are well documented and have been reviewed comprehensively by several scientific and public health organizations.3-5 diseases among American • No convincing scientific evidence has been found linking community children. One of four water fluoridation (CWF) with any potential adverse health effect or systemic disorder such as an increased risk for cancer, Down syndrome, heart disease, children living below osteoporosis and bone fracture, immune disorders, low intelligence, renal the federal poverty level disorders, Alzheimer’s disease, or allergic reactions.4,6 experience untreated • Documented risks of CWF are limited to dental fluorosis, a change in dental enamel that is primarily cosmetic in its most common form. In the United States 1 tooth decay. today, most dental fluorosis is of the mildest form, with no effect on how teeth look or function.7 Effective • The US Community Preventive Services Task Force issued a strong recommendation in 2001 and again in 2013 for CWF for the prevention and control of tooth decay.6,8 • Water fluoridation prevents tooth decay by providing frequent and consistent contact with low levels of fluoride, ultimately reducing tooth decay by about 25% in children and adults.9-12 • Schoolchildren living in fluoridated communities on average have 2.25 fewer decayed teeth compared with similar children not living in fluoridated communities.6 Reduce Disparities • CWF has been identified as the most cost-effective method of delivering fluoride to all members of the community regardless of age, educational attainment, or income level.13,14 Cost-Saving • By preventing tooth decay, CWF has been shown to save money, both for families and the health care system.11,15 • The return on investment for CWF varies with size of the community, increasing Tooth decay and its as the community size increases.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Fluoridation: Questions and Answers
    WATER FLUORIDATION QUESTIONS & ANSWERS April 2012 1 Acknowledgement I would like to acknowledge and extend my heartfelt gratitude to the many individuals who have supported this project and made valuable contributions to the development of this report. 2 Preamble Dental decay is the most common chronic disease in North America, affecting over 96 per cent of Canadians. The use of water fluoridation for the prevention of tooth decay has been used for over 60 years and is endorsed by over 90 national and international government and health organizations, including Health Canada, the Canadian Public Health Association, the Canadian Dental Association, the Canadian Medical Association and the World Health Organization. Since its inception, extensive research has consistently demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of fluorides in the prevention of dental caries. In addition, there has been continual monitoring of this scientific literature by the world’s major national and international health organizations, committees of experts and special councils of governments. To date the results of these reviews reaffirm that water fluoridation, at the recommended level, is a safe and effective means of reducing dental decay and does not pose a risk for health problems. This document has been prepared for public health professionals and councils, including those of the medical and dental fields, to address common questions about the safety and efficacy of water fluoridation. A number of these questions address myths and misconceptions advanced by opponents of water fluoridation. The answers are based on generally accepted, peer-reviewed, scientific literature, including recent publications from the Public Health Agency of Canada and Health Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Effects of Water Fluoridation: a Review of the Scientific Evidence
    Health effects of water fluoridation: A review of the scientific evidence A report on behalf of the Royal Society of New Zealand and the Office of the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor August 2014 Office of the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor PO Box 108-117, Symonds Street, Auckland 1150, New Zealand Telephone: +64 9 923 6318 Website: www.pmcsa.org.nz Email: [email protected] Royal Society of New Zealand 11 Turnbull Street, Thorndon, PO Box 598, Wellington 6140, New Zealand Website: www.royalsociety.org.nz Telephone: +64 4 472 7421 Fax: +64 4 473 1841 ISBN- 978-1-877317-08-8 20 August 2014 Dr Roger Blakeley Chief Planning Officer Auckland Council Dear Dr Blakeley In February this year, on behalf of several Councils, you made similar requests to the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor (PMCSA), the Royal Society of New Zealand (RSNZ), and the Ministry of Health, to review the scientific evidence for and against the efficacy and safety of fluoridation of public water supplies. After discussion between the parties, it was agreed that the Office of the PMCSA and the RSNZ would establish a panel to undertake a review. This review would adhere strictly to the scientific issues of safety and efficacy (or otherwise), but take into account the various concerns that have been raised in the public domain about the science and safety of fluoride. It would not consider the ethical and philosophical issues that have surrounded fluoridation and influenced legal proceedings lately. The Prime Minister gave his consent for the Office of the PMCSA to be involved and funding was provided by Councils through your office and by the Ministry of Health.
    [Show full text]