DOCSLIB.ORG

Incident Management Situation Report Thursday July 31, 2003 - 0530 Mdt National Preparedness Level 5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Incident Management Situation Report Thursday July 31, 2003 - 0530 Mdt National Preparedness Level 5 INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SITUATION REPORT THURSDAY JULY 31, 2003 - 0530 MDT NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS LEVEL 5 CURRENT SITUATION: Initial attack activity was moderate in the Eastern Great Basin, Rocky Mountain and Southern California Areas and light elsewhere. Nationally, 240 new fires were reported. Nine new large fires were reported, two each in the Northern Rockies, the Northwest and the Southern California Areas, three in the Northern California Area and one in the Eastern Great Basin. Nine large fires were contained, one each in the Northern Rockies, Northern California, Rocky Mountain, and Northwest Areas, two in the Eastern Great Basin, and three in the Southern Area. Very high to extreme fire indices were reported in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. NORTHERN ROCKIES AREA LARGE FIRES: An Area Command Team (Mann) is assigned to manage the Wedge Canyon, Robert, Trapper Creek Complex, Ross Creek and the Little Salmon Creek Complex on the Flathead National Forest and Glacier National Park. ROBERT, Flathead National Forest. A unified command between a Type 1 Incident Management Team (Stam) and Flathead County is in place. This fire is in timber, 8 miles north of Columbia Falls, MT. The fire was under a heavy smoke inversion until 1500 hours today. Crews conducted successful burn out operation on the west side of the fire and the containment line on the east side was improved. The fire remains a major threat to communities along the North and Middle Fork drainages of the Flathead River and the communities within Glacier National Park. Evacuations have been implemented in West Glacier and Blankenship Road areas. Structure protection is in place for 200 residences and 24 commercial properties. WEDGE CANYON, Flathead National Forest. A Type 1 Incident Management Team (Bennett) is assigned. This fire is in sub-alpine fir with down fuel, 20 miles east of Eureka, MT. Conditions for extreme fire behavior are in place with very dry fuels and hot, dry weather. Active ground fire with torching, short duration runs and spotting was observed. Crews are making good progress on the southwest side of the fire. Evacuations remain in effect from Moose Creek to the Canadian border. Evacuated residents are being informed daily on the fire’s status through community meetings held each morning and evening. Structure protection is in place for 100 residences. TRAPPER CREEK COMPLEX, Glacier National Park. A Type 1 Incident Management Team (Raley) is assigned. This complex, comprised of Trapper Creek, Wolf Gun and Paul Bunyan fires, is in mixed conifer with dead and down fuels, 45 miles northeast of Kalispell, MT. The Paul Bunyan fire was contained. The major road through Glacier National Park (Going to the Sun Highway) has been closed and the Many Glacier developed area of the park has been evacuated and closed to public use. There is a potential for the fire to spread across the U.S./Canadian border and also into the Blackfeet Indian Reservation, if the fire continues north and east across the Continental Divide. The Trapper Creek fire is moving to the east and the Wolf Gun fire is moving to the north. Fire managers and the Canadian Park Service are developing cooperative suppression and contingency plans. Smoke continues to impact Glacier National Park, Waterton Lakes National Park, B.C. and Lethbridge, B.C., Canada. Ground fires with torching and spotting were observed. Helicopter drops slowed fire spread and prevented fire runs from developing. Structure protection is in place for three commercial properties. ROSS CREEK, Kootenai National Forest. A Type 2 Incident Management Team (Sandman) is assigned. This fire is in sub-alpine fir with tall brush and heavy down fuel loads, 20 miles southwest of Troy, MT. Creeping fire behavior with intermittent single tree torching was observed. Crews continue to build containment lines and mop up on all divisions. The Ross Creek Trail remains closed. BLACK FROG COMPLEX, Bitterroot National Forest. A Type 1 Incident Management Team (Frye) is assigned. This complex, comprised of the Blackwall and Frog Pond fires, is 34 miles south of Hamilton, MT and 32 miles north of Salmon, ID. Higher temperatures lower relative humidity and increased winds have resulted in increased fire behavior on both fires. Individual and group torching was common with increased fire activity in ground fuels. Crews continue to make excellent progress on the south, west and north flanks of the Frog Pond fire and on the north, west and east flanks of the Blackwall fire. Structure protection is in place for 75 residences and one commercial property. Evacuations from Moose Meadows remain in place. Highway 93 is open to piloted public vehicles from 0600 to 2100. Highway 43 is open from Lost Trail Pass, east. SLIMS, Nez Perce National Forest. A transfer of command from Benes’ Type 2 Incident Management Team to Mortier’s Type 1 Incident Management Team will take place today. This fire is in ponderosa pine and mixed conifer, 35 miles east of Grangeville, ID. The main influence on fire spread has been up slope/up canyon winds which continue to push the fire south and east. The fire continues to spread through heavy surface fuels with several major runs and group torching yesterday afternoon. HUNT CREEK FIRE, Priest Lake Area Office, Idaho Department of Lands. A Type 2 Incident Management Team (Kechter) is assigned. This fire is in heavy, cured logging slash, eight miles northwest of Coolin, ID. Active ground fire with single and group torching was observed. Fire activity was fuel and terrain driven. TOBOGGAN, Idaho Panhandle National Forest. A Type 2 Incident Management Team (Gray) has been ordered. This fire is 12 miles northeast of Wallace, ID. Extreme fire behavior with several major crown runs and spotting was observed. HIDDEN LAKE, Beaverhead/Deerlodge National Forest. A Type 2 Incident Management Team (Chrisman) is assigned. This fire is in sub-alpine fire, four miles northeast of Polaris, MT. The eastern front of the fire was active with increased torching which developed a column that rose to 10,000 feet Above Ground Level (AGL). BIG CREEK, Bitterroot National Forest. This fire is in timber, four miles northwest of Victor, MT. Minimal fire behavior with a small amount of torching in the interior was observed. SHASTA, Nez Perce National Forest. A Fire Use Management Team (Bonefeld) is assigned. This lightning-caused Wildland Fire Use (WFU) incident is being managed to accomplish resource objectives. The fire is in Douglas fir, ponderosa pine, and brush, 50 miles northeast of Grangeville, ID. Active ground fire with isolated torching was observed by aerial reconnaissance. INCIDENT NAME ST UNIT SIZE % EST TOTL CRW ENG HELI STRC $$$ CTN CTN PERS LOST CTD ROBERT MT FNF 14,500 5 UNK 903 21 83 6 2 3.6M WEDGE CANYON MT FNF 21,374 25 8/18 1,051 30 69 4 29 7.3M TRAPPER CREEK MT GNP 18,600 35 9/5 197 4 10 3 1 504K COMPLEX ROSS CREEK MT KNF 195 70 8/2 428 15 0 2 0 1.6M BLACK FROG COMPLEX MT BRF 7,500 35 UNK 819 23 26 6 0 5.8M SLIMS ID NPF 5,000 10 UNK 499 15 6 6 0 3.3M HUNT CREEK FIRE ID PLS 475 25 8/1 347 10 6 3 0 739K TOBOGGAN ID IPF 120 0 UNK 87 4 0 1 0 NR HIDDEN LAKE MT BDF 3,500 75 8/2 168 3 0 2 0 2.2M BIG CREEK MT BRF 1,339 80 UNK 187 3 11 2 0 3.9M SHASTA ID NPF 139 N/A N/A 8 0 0 0 0 41K FLANNIGAN ID PDS 190 100 --- 0 0 0 0 0 NR PDS = Ponderosa Area Office Idaho Department of Lands EASTERN GREAT BASIN AREA LARGE FIRES: An Area Command Team (Ribar) is assigned to manage the Cramer and Crystal Creek fires on the Salmon-Challis National Forest. CENTERVILLE FIRE, Northwest State, Utah State Division of Forestry Fire & State Lands. Type 2 Incident Management Team (Broyles) has been ordered. A This fire is in very heavy scrub oak, grass, sub-alpine fir and bug kill timber, at the north end of the city of Centerville, UT. Creeping fire with short runs, crowning and spotting was observed. Structure protection is in place for 100 residences. HOT CREEK, Boise National Forest. A Type 1 Incident Management Team (Sexton) is assigned. This fire is in mixed conifer with heavy fuel loading, three miles west of Atlanta, ID. Occasional torching and short uphill runs were observed. Crews and aerial resources successfully completed two burn out operations today. Evacuations of isolated summer cabins and campers remain in effect. Structure protection is in place for 80 residences and ten commercial properties. CRAMER, Salmon-Challis National Forest. A Type 1 Incident Management Team (Martin) is assigned. This fire is in timber, 20 miles west of North Fork, ID. Minimal fire behavior with some visible smokes was observed. Structure protection is in place for 38 residences. OXKILLER, Caribou-Targhee National Forest. This fire is in grass, sage and juniper, three miles east of Franklin, ID. Creeping fire behavior was observed. Crews made good progress securing containment lines. Minimal Impact Suppression Techniques (MIST) were used in the wilderness. JOE HATCH, Moab Field Office, Bureau of Land Management. A Type 2 Incident Management Team (Suwyn) is assigned. This fire is 25 miles north of Green River, UT. Down slope creeping with isolated torching was observed in Douglas fir and mountain brush. The fire is in extremely rugged and inaccessible terrain. CRYSTAL CREEK, Salmon-Challis National Forest. This fire is in sub-alpine fir, brush and grass, 18 miles north/northwest of Stanley, ID.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weld County 2011-2013 Annual Wildfire Operating Plan
    WELD COUNTY 2011-2013 ANNUAL WILDFIRE OPERATING PLAN Prepared by: Weld County Office of Emergency Management Weld County Fire Chiefs’ Association Colorado State Forest Service, Fort Collins District Pawnee National Grasslands, Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forests This agreement is to remain in effect until the next Annual Operating Plan is modified and signed TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ANNUAL WILDFIRE OPERATING PLAN APPROVALS ............................................. 3 II. JURISDICTIONS / MAP ..................................................................................................... 4 III. AUTHORITIES FOR THIS PLAN ..................................................................................... 4 IV. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................ 4 V. FIRE MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................... 4 VI. RESOURCE LIST ............................................................................................................... 4 VII. WILDFIRE READINESS .................................................................................................... 5 A. Planning ................................................................................................................................ 5 B. Training ................................................................................................................................. 5 C. Equipment ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and Nonnative Invasive Plants September 2008 Zouhar, Kristin; Smith, Jane Kapler; Sutherland, Steve; Brooks, Matthew L
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Ecosystems General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 6 Fire and Nonnative Invasive Plants September 2008 Zouhar, Kristin; Smith, Jane Kapler; Sutherland, Steve; Brooks, Matthew L. 2008. Wildland fire in ecosystems: fire and nonnative invasive plants. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 6. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 355 p. Abstract—This state-of-knowledge review of information on relationships between wildland fire and nonnative invasive plants can assist fire managers and other land managers concerned with prevention, detection, and eradi- cation or control of nonnative invasive plants. The 16 chapters in this volume synthesize ecological and botanical principles regarding relationships between wildland fire and nonnative invasive plants, identify the nonnative invasive species currently of greatest concern in major bioregions of the United States, and describe emerging fire-invasive issues in each bioregion and throughout the nation. This volume can help increase understanding of plant invasions and fire and can be used in fire management and ecosystem-based management planning. The volume’s first part summarizes fundamental concepts regarding fire effects on invasions by nonnative plants, effects of plant invasions on fuels and fire regimes, and use of fire to control plant invasions. The second part identifies the nonnative invasive species of greatest concern and synthesizes information on the three topics covered in part one for nonnative inva- sives in seven major bioregions of the United States: Northeast, Southeast, Central, Interior West, Southwest Coastal, Northwest Coastal (including Alaska), and Hawaiian Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Fire BAER Revisit – May 10-14, 2010
    United States Department of Agriculture Station Fire Forest Service Pacific Southwest BAER Revisit Region September 2009 Angeles National Forest May 10-14, 2010 Big Tujunga Dam Overlook May 11, 2010 Acknowledgements I would like to express thanks to the following groups and individuals for their efforts for planning and holding the Revisit. Thanks to all the Resource Specialists who participated; Jody Noiron - Forest Supervisor; Angeles National Forest Leader- ship Team; Lisa Northrop - Forest Resource and Planning Officer; Marc Stamer - Station Fire Assessment Team Leader (San Bernardino NF); Kevin Cooper - Assistant Station Fire Assessment Team Leader (Los Padres NF); Todd Ellsworth - Revisit Facilitator (Inyo NF); Dr. Sue Cannon, US Geological Survey, Denver, CO; Jess Clark, Remote Sensing Application Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Pete Wohlgemuth, Pacific Southwest Research Station-Riverside, Penny Luehring, National BAER Coordinator, and Gary Chase (Shasta-Trinity NF) for final report formatting and editing. Brent Roath, R5, Regional Soil Scientist/BAER Coordinator June 14, 2010 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Departments by County FDID Dept Name Mailing Address City Zip Chief Namereg Year Phone Chief E-Mail
    Fire Departments by County FDID Dept Name Mailing Address City Zip Chief NameReg Year Phone Chief E-Mail ADAIR 00105 ADAIR COUNTY RURAL FIRE DIST #1 801 N Davis Greentop 63546 Barry Mitchell2010 (660) 627-5394 [email protected] 00103 EASTERN ADAIR FIRE & RESCUE P. O. BOX 1049 Brashear 63533 JAMES SNYDER2010 (660) 865-9886 [email protected] 00101 KIRKSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT 401 N FRANKLIN KIRKSVILLE 63501 RANDY BEHRENS2010 (660) 665-3734 [email protected] 00106 NOVINGER COMMUNITY VOL FIRE ASSOCATION INC P. O. BOX 326 NOVINGER 63559 DAVID KETTLE2010 (660) 488-7615 00104 SOUTHWESTERN ADAIR COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 24013 STATE HIGHWAY 3 KIRKSVILLE 63501 DENNIS VANSICKEL2010 (660) 665-8338 [email protected] ANDREW 00202 BOLCKOW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PO BOX 113 BOLCKOW 64427 JIM SMITH2008 (816) 428-2012 [email protected] 00201 COSBY-HELENA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COSBY 64436 Dennis Ford2010 (816) 662-2106 [email protected] 00203 FILLMORE FIRE PROTECTION DIST P. O. BOX 42 FILLMORE 64449 RON LANCE2008 (816) 487-4048 00207 ROSENDALE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PO BOX 31 ROSENDALE 64483 BRYAN ANDREW 2003 00205 SAVANNAH FIRE DEPARTMENT PO BOX 382 SAVANNAH 64485 Tommy George2010 (816) 324-7533 [email protected] 00206 SAVANNAH RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PO BOX 382 SAVANNAH 64485 Tommy George2010 (816) 324-7533 [email protected] ATCHISON 00301 FAIRFAX VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT P.O. BOX 513 FAIRFAX 64446 ROBERT ERWIN 2008 00308 ROCK PORT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT PO Box 127 ROCK PORT 64482 STEPHEN SHINEMAN2010 (660) 744-2141 [email protected] 00304 TARKIO FIRE DEPARTMENT 112 WALNUT TARKIO 64491 DUANE UMBAUGE 2006 00306 WATSON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT PO BOX 127 ROCKPORT 64482 TOM GIBSON2008 (660) 744-2141 00305 WEST ATCHISON RURAL FIRE DISTRICT 516 SOUTH MAIN ST ROCKPORT 64482 STEPHEN SHINEMAN2010 (660) 744-2141 [email protected] 00302 WESTBORO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Fires and Global Change Challenges for Concerted International Action
    A White Paper directed to the United Nations and International Organizations A Action Challenges for Concerted International Fires and Global Change Vegetation The White Paper “Vegetation Fires and Global Change” is a global state-of-the- art analysis of the role of vegetation fires Vegetation Fires and in the Earth System and is published as a collective achievement of the world’s most renowned scientists and research Global Change groups working in fire science, ecology, atmospheric chemistry, remote sensing and climate change modeling. The aim of the White Paper is to support the en- deavour of the United Nations and its af- Challenges for Concerted International Action filiated processes and networks, notably A White Paper directed to the United Nations the United Nations International Strat- egy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), and International Organizations the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005- 2015 “Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters” and the Global Wildland Fire Network, to address global vegetation fires for the benefit of the global environment and humanity. The White Paper provides insight into the complexity of global vegetation fire issues and rationale for coordinated, in- ternational action in crossboundary fire management at global scale. This White Paper has been commis- sioned by the UNISDR Wildland Fire Ad- visory Group through its Secretariat, the Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC), Associate Institute of the United Nations University and Secretariat of the Global Wildland Fire Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Effects of Prescribed Fire Season: a Literature Review and Synthesis for Managers
    United States Department of Ecological Effects of Prescribed Agriculture Forest Service Fire Season: A Literature Review Pacific Southwest Research Station and Synthesis for Managers General Technical Report Eric E. Knapp, Becky L. Estes, and Carl N. Skinner PSW-GTR-224 September 2009 The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sus- tained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and manage- ment of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795- 3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Authors Eric E. Knapp is a research ecologist, Becky L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Wildfire Season: an Overview, Southwestern U.S. Ecological Restoration Institute and Southwest Fire Science Consortium, Northern Arizona University
    2015 Wildfire Season: An Overview Southwestern U.S. MAY 2016 Intermountain West Frequent-fire Forest Restoration Ecological restoration is a practice that seeks to heal degraded ecosystems by reestablishing native species, structural characteristics, and ecological processes. The Society for Ecological Restoration International defines ecological restoration as “an intentional activity that initiates or accelerates the recovery of an ecosystem with respect to its health, integrity and sustainability….Restoration attempts to return an ecosystem to its historic trajectory” (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group 2004). Most frequent-fire forests throughout the Intermountain West have been degraded during the last 150 years. Many of these forests are now dominated by unnaturally dense thickets of small trees, and lack their once diverse understory of grasses, sedges, and forbs. Forests in this condition are highly susceptible to damaging, stand-replacing fires and increased insect and disease epidemics. Restoration of these forests centers on reintroducing frequent, low-severity surface fires—often after thinning dense stands—and reestablishing productive understory plant communities. The Ecological Restoration Institute at Northern Arizona University is a pioneer in researching, implementing, and monitoring ecological restoration of frequent-fire forests of the Intermountain West. By allowing natural processes, such as low-severity fire, to resume self-sustaining patterns, we hope to reestablish healthy forests that provide ecosystem services, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities. The Southwest Fire Science Consortium (SWFSC) is a way for managers, scientists, and policy makers to interact and share science. SWFSC’s goal is to see the best available science used to make management decisions and scientists working on the questions managers need answered.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Fire Review
    Reading Fire Review Smoke rises north of Reading Peak on Sunday, August 4, 2012—one week after lightning ignites the Reading Fire. Left and middle Reading Fire suppression photos taken on August 16. Photo on right of firefighters gridding for spots is from August 15. Lassen Volcanic National Park December 18, 2012 Reading Fire Review • Lassen Volcanic National Park 1 The Reading Fire as seen from Mt. Harkness on August 6. Contents Executive Summary…………………………………..… 3 1. Introduction………………………………………….………………..……… 6 2. Background – Lassen Volcanic National Park Fire History…………...... 7 3. Summary – A Learning-Focused Review of this Incident……………..... 10 4. Reading Fire Chronology………………………….………………..……… 13 5. Fire Behavior Summary…………………………..…………………..……. 20 6. Key Factors and Lessons Learned by the Participants….………...…… 29 7. Key Factors and Lessons Learned by the Review Team….….…...…… 34 8. Recommendations……………………………………….…………………. 38 9. Commendations……………….....……………………….………………… 39 10. Review Team Members………….……………………………......…….…. 40 11. Appendices Appendix A – Reading Fire Compliance with Wildland Fire Management Policy……..……………....... 41 Appendix B – Review Team Delegation of Authority…………..…….... 43 Appendix C – Reading Fire Comprehensive Chronology…………….... 44 Appendix D – The Lassen Volcanic National Park Pocket Card…...….. 51 Appendix E – General Exhibited Fire Behavior Based on Live Fuel Moisture Values…….……………….. 52 Appendix F – Manzanita RAWS Wind Graph………………….…….….. 53 Cover page photo credits: Bottom left photo taken by Kim Lemke. All other photos provided by Lassen Volcanic National Park. Reading Fire Review • Lassen Volcanic National Park 2 Reading Fire Review Executive Summary On July 23, 2012, a lightning strike started the Reading Fire in the interior of Lassen Volcanic National Park. The fire, located at approximately 7,000 feet in elevation, was located in red fir with areas of rock and limited ground fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • BAER 2500-08 Burned Area Report
    USDA-FOREST SERVICE FS-2500-8 (7/00) Date of Report: 9/6/2016 Initial Request Blue Cut Fire – San Bernardino National Forest, Front Country Ranger District BURNED-AREA REPORT (Reference FSH 2509.13) Page 1 PART I - TYPE OF REQUEST Part I – A. Type of Report [x] 1. Funding request for estimated WFSU-SULT funds [ ] 2. Accomplishment Report [ ] 3. No Treatment Recommendation Part I – B. Type of Action [x] 1. Initial Request (Best estimate of funds needed to complete eligible rehabilitation measures) [ ] 2. Interim Report [ ] Updating the initial funding request based on more accurate site data or design analysis [ ] Status of accomplishments to date [ ] 3. Final Report (Following completion of work) PART II - BURNED-AREA DESCRIPTION Part II – A. Fire Name: Blue Cut Part II – B. Fire Number: CA-BDF-010468 Part II – C. State: CA Part II – D. County: San Bernardino Part II – E. Region: 05 Part II – F. Forest: San Bernardino NF Part II – G. District: 53 Part II – H. Date Fire Started: 8/16/2016 Part II – I. Date Fire Contained: 8/23/2016 PartII – J. Suppression Cost: $18 Million (P5KL99) Part II – K. Fire Suppression Damages Repaired with Suppression Funds 1. Fireline waterbarred (miles): 31.5 miles (dozer); 4.7 miles (hand) 2. Fireline seeded (miles): 0 3. Other (identify): n/a Part II – L. Watershed Number: • 180702030301 (Upper Cajon Wash) • 180702030302 (North Fork Lytle Creek) • 180702030303 (Lower Cajon Wash) • 180902080503 (Manzanita Wash) • 180902080401 (Sheep Creek) • 180902080502 (Unnamed) • 180902080704 (Oro Grande Wash) • 180902080504 (Horse Canyon-Fremont Wash) • 180902080202 (Grass Valley Creek-West Fork Mojave River) Part II – M.
    [Show full text]
  • Novato Fire Protection District Cedar Fire Incident Recovery Report May 26, 2004 Page 1 of 90 TABLE of CONTENTS Cedar Fire 2003 Prologue
    NNOOVVAATTOO Cedar Fire 32003 FFIRE PPROTECTION DDISTRICT IInnvveessttiiggaattiioonn AAnnaallyyssiiss ooff tthhee CCeeddaarr FFiirree IInncciiddeenntt Engine 6162 Crew Entrapment, Fatality, and Burn Injuries October 29, 2003 Novato Fire Protection District Cedar Fire Incident Recovery Report May 26, 2004 Page 1 of 90 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cedar Fire 2003 Prologue CDF Green Sheet Overview Summary Report Procedures The Novato Fire District The Cedar Fire NFD Resource Commitments to Southern California Engine 6162 - Dispatch and Travel to the Incident Engine 6162 – October 28, 2003 Assignments Engine 6162 – October 29, 2003 Assignments Engine 6162 – Burnover Engine 6162 – Post Burnover Actions Lessons Learned ALS Equipment Apparatus Communications Equipment Fire Behavior Personal Protective Equipment Training and Experience Policy and Tactics Human Factors Draft Standard Operating Procedures Wildland Structure Protection Refusal of Risk Wildland Firing Operations Inaja Fire Tragedy Acknowledgements Novato Fire Protection District Cedar Fire Incident Recovery Report May 26, 2004 Page 2 of 90 In Memory Of Engineer Steven Rucker and dedicated to the surviving crewmembers of Engine 6162 Cedar Fire 2003 and to all firefighters who risk their lives for those they serve. The Novato Fire District produced this report with hope that the reader will find within it information worthy of consideration in the ongoing effort to improve firefighter safety and survival in the wildland interface environment. The contents of this report relate solely to the operations of Novato Fire District Engine 6162 from the time of dispatch on October 27, 2003 until the burn over occurred on the Cedar Fire on October 29, 2003. A careful review of the District equipment, training procedures and policies that may have played a role in this event was conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • News Headlines 8/12-14/2017
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ News Headlines 8/12-14/2017 The things she carried High Desert residents recall past wildfires Trial by fire Brought together by Bluecut: Volunteers reflect a year later Rebuilding a rarity after Bluecut Fire A year after Bluecut Fire, hotel price gouging claims still under probe Two elderly hikers found dead at Amboy Crater Yorba Linda couple identified as hikers found dead near Amboy Crater Two hikers found dead near Amboy Crater Couple who went hiking in triple-digit heat found dead in the Mojave Desert Two Hikers Found Dead At Amboy Crater Saturday Firefighters work in darkness to battle wash fire in Highland Fire burns old store on Highway 173 in Hesperia San Bernardino fire 1 The things she carried Matthew Cabe, Daily Press Posted: August 12, 2017, 12:57 PM A year after the Pilot Fire, Jeanne Helsley looks over her Hesperia property. Helsley had to evacuate, and did so for the first time without the help of her husband, who died in 2012. [James Quigg, Daily Press] HESPERIA — There wasn’t much time. Evacuations had been ordered. Jeanne Helsley could see the Pilot Fire as it torched the Pinnacles — a popular hiking destination — from her home just north of the Joshua Inn, a dive bar that she said has produced “good neighbors.” “I was out in a half-hour,” Helsley recalled. She’d been through this before. After moving to Hesperia in 1979, Helsley and her husband, Eugene, were thrice evacuated during large fires. But this time was different. “Previously I had a husband. He passed away five years ago,” Helsley said.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F: CWPP: the Sea Ranch
    Appendix F: CWPP: The Sea Ranch The Sea Ranch COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Sonoma County, California Prepared by Fire Safe Sonoma, The Sea Ranch Fire Safe Council, The Sea Ranch Association with assistance from The Sea Ranch Fire Department, Sonoma County Fire and Emergency Services Department and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Funding for this Plan was provided by a National Fire Plan Grant from the U. S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management through the California Fire Safe Council. Table of Contents I. THE SEA RANCH COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Agreement .......................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 2 III. COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION .................................................................. 5 History .......................................................................................................... 6 Early Inhabitants ................................................................................... 6 The Sea Ranch ...................................................................................... 6 Water ..................................................................................................... 6 Central TPZ Acquired ........................................................................... 7 Environment ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]