Conservatives, Commissions, and the Politics of Federalism, 1947–1996

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservatives, Commissions, and the Politics of Federalism, 1947–1996 Reorganizing the Activist State: Conservatives, Commissions, and the Politics of Federalism, 1947–1996 By Philip Bartholomew Rocco A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Christopher K. Ansell, Chair Professor Sean Farhang Professor Eric Schickler Professor Ann C. Keller Spring 2015 Reorganizing the Activist State: Conservatives, Commissions, and the Politics of Federalism, 1947–1996 Copyright 2015 by Philip Bartholomew Rocco Abstract Reorganizing the Activist State: Conservatives, Commissions, and the Politics of Federalism, 1947–1996 by Philip Bartholomew Rocco Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Christopher K. Ansell, Chair This study examines the origins of conservative efforts to reform the “activist American state” in the postwar period by reorganizing fiscal and administrative relationships between federal, state, and local governments. Existing scholarship suggests that conservatives’ efforts to grant sub-national governments greater decision-making authority over national policies were either an obvious extension of challenges to the New Deal or a reaction to liberal policies in the 1960s. Drawing on a combination of archival sources, secondary literature, and quantitative data, this study shows, in contrast, that conservative challenges to the activist state in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s were shaped by institutional investments made in the early 1950s. Indeed, long before the Great Society, conservative policy entrepreneurs constructed what I call generative institutions that gradually reconfigured the political context in which debates over federalism occurred. These institutions reframed the critique of centralized government as a dilemma of proper administration and management, built broader political coalitions with state and local officials, and experimented with new policy alternatives that would become the basis of later reforms. The institutions conservatives built were commissions for studying and deliberating about problems of “intergovernmental relations.” Intergovernmental commissions helped conservatives to recalibrate their engagement with a growing federal government in three ways. First, in the absence of wider support for reform, these commissions refocused conservatives’ arguments from ideological or constitutional claims into administrative ones by marshaling the power of existing executive-branch institutions to produce and publicize novel information about that branch’s own problems, helping to investigate and publicize concrete policy failures and tensions that agencies did not wish to expose. Second, the commissions’ bipartisan, intergovernmental composition provided conservatives in government with a single forum for organizational brokerage––the ability to build policy consensus with a diverse range of stakeholders, namely, state and local elected officials. As a result, the commissions’ research products came to be valued by a broader audience than conservative reformers 1 alone. Third, over time, commissions accumulated strategic knowledge about intergovernmental relations, which allowed conservative policy entrepreneurs to criticize major categorical grant programs and recombine older policy proposals into viable new reforms. The result was not the retrenchment of the activist state, as some conservative policy entrepreneurs hoped, but a set of reforms that empowered state governments to play a more important role in shaping the outcome of federal policies. In showing how intergovernmental commissions gave conservatives the capacity to reorganize authority within the activist state, this study also makes a larger claim about patterns of institutional change within studies of American Political Development (APD). While APD is concerned with explaining “durable shifts in governing authority,” recent historical-institutional scholarship suggests that major shifts may emerge not from systemic shocks but from gradual processes of drift, conversion, and layering; the recombination of ideas and interests by skilled entrepreneurs; or the formation of policy networks. These studies examine how entrepreneurial actors pursue direct policy changes, yet they fail to take into account how new institutions can help to subsidize the costs of entrepreneurship. Similarly, while scholarship on policy agendas focuses on the importance of venue shifting, it says little about what distinguishes venues that catalyze change from those that do not. Generative institutions, I argue, can pave the way for major reforms by routinizing the production of policy information, building consensus, and developing policy expertise. 2 For my parents, Bart and Valerie Rocco i Acknowledgements Writing this dissertation has allowed me to experience, among other emotions, profound gratitude. I am especially grateful to the members of my dissertation committee. My dissertation chair, Chris Ansell, has been a source of inspiration and a generous teacher. Above all, conversations with Chris yielded tractable strategies for studying unwieldy organizational environments. Chris also helped me to manage the tension between creativity and constraint that defines both the action in my narrative and my own intellectual life. From the moment I arrived at Berkeley, Eric Schickler was a thoughtful mentor, commenting on everything I sent and encouraging me to think deeply, read beyond my comfort zone, and write with precision. Eric also fostered intellectual camaraderie through regular meetings of the APD Working Group, whose members discussed the papers and chapters out of which the dissertation grew. Throughout the writing process, committee members Sean Farhang and Ann Keller have helped me to improve this project immeasurably, by offering thorough comments and sharing their insights on the politics of institutional change. Several individuals and institutions at Berkeley deserve recognition for contributing time, resources, and enthusiasm to my work. The Institute of Governmental Studies (IGS), the Travers Department of Political Science, the Mike Synar Fellowship Program, and the Center for Right-Wing Studies provided me the necessary resources to undertake the archival work that is the backbone of this project. Throughout my time at IGS, Terri Bimes and Jack Citrin encouraged and assisted me in seeking research support. IGS librarians Paul King, Nick Robinson, and Julie Lefevre responded graciously to query after query. Christine Trost, Suzan Nunes, Camille Koué, Charlotte Merriweather, Barb Campbell, and Katherine Nguyen also ensured me a smooth path through Berkeley’s own administrative state. Finally, Dylan Clark, Makyla DaPonte, Bo Kovitz, and Allison Arnold went above and beyond to help analyze legislation and sift through archival documents as part of Berkeley’s Undergraduate Research Apprentice Program. Numerous colleagues have shaped the ideas that animate these pages. First and foremost, Todd LaPorte supported and inspired my interest in the tangled infrastructure of American public policy. Chloe Thurston has been a careful reader and a caring friend, and may have seen this project through more iterations than anyone else. Fellow federalism scholar Beth Pearson shared in my excitement after punishing archival digs and was always happy to talk about the gory details of revenue sharing over coffee at Babette. When I started the project, conversations with Miranda Everitt helped me to cut through the vacuous jargon, most of it anyway, to the core of my ideas. Travis Johnston and Sara Chatfield gave encouraging and honest feedback when I needed it most. PerOla Öberg and Malin Holm also kindly arranged for me to present my research as part of two doctoral workshops at Uppsala University. Further thanks are due to Michael Dichio, Karen Tani, Chris Chambers-Ju, Ruth Bloch Rubin, Gregory Elinson, Paul Schulman, Laurel Eckhouse, Janna King, Stephen Goggin, Jake Grumbach, Jason Klocek, David Brian Robertson, Margaret Weir, Daniel Béland, Alex Waddan, Julia Azari, Lisa Miller, ii Adam Sheingate, and Andrew S. Kelly for their willingness to read drafts, talk about ideas, or simply wax poetic. As I wrote, sturdy companions helped me to avoid a hermetic lifestyle. I will never forget surveying the world from the top of the Hoover Tower with Peter Ekman, whose esprit de corps and sense of spatial adventure have made him my own personal “Center on Urban Studies.” After long days of writing, I was often privileged to share laughs and dinner with Joyce S. Lee, a housemate who has sustained me with her bonhomie and good taste. While Alicia Puglionesi was far away, her phone calls and letters have contributed to a Wunderkammer of ideas that continue to enrich my life. Adequate words of thanks do not exist for friends who offered their support during a difficult time, including Andrew Macurak, Jack Thearle, Gerard Leone, Gemma Mangione, Lauren Mancuso, David Reinecke, Maia Averett, Patrick Driscoll, Alex Roehrkasse, Ben Shestakofsky, Gordon Shen, and Nathan Grover. In their professional capacities, Bryan Port and Brad Sickenius did the same. Let it also be said that some of my best writing was done while house sitting for Hans Wuerfmannsdobler and Teresa Mora; their cats Charlie and Parker proved to be ideal editorial assistants. Most importantly, none of my work would have been possible or meaningful without
Recommended publications
  • LABQR-Mmgmemt REPOEHIG and DISCLOSURE ACT of 1959
    Labor-management reporting and disclosure act of 1959; a case study in the legislative process Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Rusk, James Jarrett, 1934- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 08/10/2021 04:56:19 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318874 LABQR-mMGMEMT REPOEHIG AND DISCLOSURE ACT OF 1959 A CASE STUDY II THE LEGISLATEFfi PROCESS James Jarrett Rusk A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the ' Dl^ARTEElT OF GOVERlEilT ' In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements . For the Degree of . MASTER OF ARTS . In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZOM 1961 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of re­ quirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in The University Library to be made available to bor­ rowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permis­ sion must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 166 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2020 No. 9 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was ically, this would be Tim’s final rescue Pennsylvania (Mr. THOMPSON) for 5 called to order by the Speaker pro tem- operation. minutes. pore (Mr. CUELLAR). Despite the risks, Tim’s endless dedi- Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania. f cation to serving others guided him Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize through 9 years as a volunteer with the and honor Sergeant Harry Amigh, a DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO search and rescue team, where he as- resident of Ebensburg, Pennsylvania, TEMPORE sisted countless operations to help save and a Korean war veteran. The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- the lives of fellow San Bernardino Sergeant Amigh enlisted in the fore the House the following commu- County residents. United States Army in 1948 and would nication from the Speaker: But his passion for search and rescue go on to serve in the Battle of Chosin was not the extent of Tim’s desire to WASHINGTON, DC, Reservoir, one of the Korean war’s January 15, 2020. serve his community. Tim’s desire to greatest battles. Sergeant Amigh was I hereby appoint the Honorable HENRY serve the community spanned across killed in action during that battle at CUELLAR to act as Speaker pro tempore on education and community and civic ac- just 20 years old. this day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of Enemies: Investigating Conservative Environmental Polarization, 1945-1981
    The Creation of Enemies: Investigating Conservative Environmental Polarization, 1945-1981 by Adam Duane Orford A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Energy and Resources in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Daniel Kammen, Co-Chair Professor Katherine O’Neill, Co-Chair Professor Alastair Iles Professor Rebecca McLennan Spring 2021 © 2021 Adam Duane Orford all rights reserved Abstract The Creation of Enemies: Investigating Conservative Environmental Polarization, 1945-1981 by Adam Duane Orford Doctor of Philosophy in Energy and Resources University of California, Berkeley Professors Daniel Kammen and Katherine O’Neill, Co-Chairs This Dissertation examines the history of the conservative relationship with environmentalism in the United States between 1945 and 1981. In response to recent calls to bring the histories of U.S. political conservatism and environmentalism into conversation with each other, it investigates postwar environmental political history through the lens of partisan and ideological polarization and generates a research agenda for the field. It then contributes three new studies in conservative environmental politics: an analysis of the environmental rhetoric of a national business magazine; the legislative history of the first law to extend the power of the federal government to fight air pollution; and a history of the conservative response to Earth Day. It concludes that conservative opposition to environmentalism in the United States has been both ideological and situational. 1 Acknowledgements My most profound gratitude… To my parents, who always encouraged me to pursue my passions; To my wife, Dax, who knows what it takes to write a dissertation (I love you); And to all of the many people I have learned from at U.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Elections; Electoral College
    CHAPTER 10 Presidential Elections; Electoral College § 1. In General; Electoral Certificates § 2. Joint Sessions to Count Electoral Votes § 3. Counting Votes; Objections to Count § 4. Presidential Nominations for Vice President INDEX TO PRECEDENTS Certificates ascertaining electors Joint session to count electoral votes generally, see § 3.5 —Cont. transmittal of, to the House, § 1.l recesses in connection with, § § 2.2, 2.3 Certificates of electoral Votes statutory procedures relative to, § 2.6 conflicts relative to, § 3.5 Presidential nominations for Vice objections to vote count, § 3.6 President transmittal of, to the House, §§ 1.1 et confirmation of, § 4.3 seq. referral of, to committee, § 4.2 Joint session to count electoral votes transmission of, by message, § 4.1 concurrent resolution providing for, Tellers to count electoral votes § 2.1 appointment of, in the House, § § 3.1, convening of, § 2.4 3.2 division of, to consider objections, § 3.6 appointment of, in the Senate, § 3.4 presiding officer for, § 2.5 substitution for, in the House, § 3.3 Commentary and editing by John R. Graham, Jr., J.D. and Roy Miller, LL.B. 1557 Presidential Elections; Electoral College § 1. In General; Electoral whether the President should be Certificates chosen by popular vote, by the Congress, or by some other meth- Under the U.S. Constitution, od. Election by direct popular vote both the House and Senate for- was rejected because it was be- mally participate in the process by lieved that the people would have which the President and Vice insufficient knowledge of the var- President are elected. Congress is ious candidates, and because it directed by the 12th amendment was assumed that the people to receive and, in joint session, would be unable to agree on a sin- count the electoral votes certified gle candidate.
    [Show full text]
  • Joe Bartlett Interview 3
    Dorsey Joseph (Joe) Bartlett, Brigadier General Page, U.S. House of Representatives (1941–1944) Chief Page, U.S. House of Representatives (1945–1953) Reading Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives (1953–1971) Clerk to the Minority (1971–1979) Oral History Interviews Final Edited Transcripts April 7, 2006 May 17, 2006 June 14, 2006 July 12, 2006 Office of the Historian U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. Table of Contents Interview Abstract i Interviewee Biography i Editing Practices ii Citation Information iii Interviewer Biography iii Interview One 1 Interview Two 44 Interview Three 90 Interview Four 135 Notes 177 Index 181 Abstract In the summer of 1941, just before his 15th birthday, Joe Bartlett left the family farm in rural West Virginia to work as a Page on Capitol Hill. But what he expected would be a one-month position became a House career that spanned 38 years. Bartlett eventually served as the chief of Pages, then as a reading clerk and, in the 1970s, as Clerk to the Minority—the senior Republican staff officer in the House. In his series of interviews, he provided many details on House proceedings and insights on how each of his positions fit into the day-to-day operation of the institution. Bartlett witnessed and described many historic events during his long tenure on the Hill, including President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “Day of Infamy” speech on December 8, 1941 and the 1954 shooting in the House Chamber. His interviews touched upon the daily routines, customs, and traditions he observed in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservatives, Commissions, and the Politics of Federalism, 1947–1996
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Reorganizing the Activist State: Conservatives, Commissions, and the Politics of Federalism, 1947–1996 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8v67g283 Author Rocco, Philip Bartholomew Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Reorganizing the Activist State: Conservatives, Commissions, and the Politics of Federalism, 1947–1996 By Philip Bartholomew Rocco A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Christopher K. Ansell, Chair Professor Sean Farhang Professor Eric Schickler Professor Ann C. Keller Spring 2015 Reorganizing the Activist State: Conservatives, Commissions, and the Politics of Federalism, 1947–1996 Copyright 2015 by Philip Bartholomew Rocco Abstract Reorganizing the Activist State: Conservatives, Commissions, and the Politics of Federalism, 1947–1996 by Philip Bartholomew Rocco Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Christopher K. Ansell, Chair This study examines the origins of conservative efforts to reform the “activist American state” in the postwar period by reorganizing fiscal and administrative relationships between federal, state, and local governments. Existing scholarship suggests that conservatives’ efforts to grant sub-national governments greater decision-making authority over national policies were either an obvious extension of challenges to the New Deal or a reaction to liberal policies in the 1960s. Drawing on a combination of archival sources, secondary literature, and quantitative data, this study shows, in contrast, that conservative challenges to the activist state in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s were shaped by institutional investments made in the early 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • View, IX (1944), 139-50
    THE RELATION OF CONSTITUENCY AND ELECTORAL COMPETIHON TO CONGRESSIONAL PARTY VOTING TN THREE MID-WESTERN STATES. 19514960 Thesis {or “we Degre. of M. A. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Suzanne Murray 196.1 ABSTRACT THE RELATION OF CONSTITUENCY AND ELECTORAL COMPETITION TO CONGRESSIONAL PARTY VOTING IN THREE MIDWESTERN STATES, 1957-1960 by Suzanne Murray The roll call vote has been employed as the basic data in a significant body of research into the legislative process. Central to much of this research has been the hypothesis that party voting cohesion rests upon a similarity of constituencies represented and upon the electoral security of the legislators and, conversely, that deviations from the party majority are the products of the representation of "atypical" constituencies and of electoral competition. These hypotheses were posed in examining the voting records of Congressmen from Indiana, Michigan and Ohio in the 85th and 86th Congresses (1957-1960). The positions of these Congressmen on seven issue areas (Civil Rights, Labor, Housing, Education, Public Works, Foreign Aid, and Civil Liberties) were obtained by the construction of cumulative scales. The scale scores obtained were then related to the variables of party, constituency and electoral competition. Constituencies were classified by their percentage of urban population and electoral competition was measured in terms of the incumbent's percentage of the two-party vote in the previous election. The major findings were: 1. The base of power of the Democratic party group in this area.1ay_ in non-competitive metropolitan districts. While the largest number of Republican districts fell into the rural category, non-competitive Republican districts were‘more evenly distributed among the constituency types than were Democratic non-competitive districts.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Their Use in the House, 1947-2011
    Resolutions of Inquiry: An Analysis of Their Use in the House, 1947-2011 -name redacted- Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process May 15, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R40879 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Resolutions of Inquiry: An Analysis of Their Use in the House, 1947-2011 Summary A resolution of inquiry is a simple resolution making a direct request or demand of the President or the head of an executive department to furnish the House with specific factual information in the Administration’s possession. Under the rules and precedents of the U.S. House of Representatives, such resolutions, if properly drafted, are given a privileged parliamentary status. This means that, under certain circumstances, a resolution of inquiry can be brought up on the House floor even if the committee to which it was referred has not reported it and the majority party leadership has not scheduled it for consideration. Between 1947 and 2011, 290 resolutions of inquiry were introduced in the House of Representatives. Two periods in particular, 1971-1975 and 2003-2006, saw the highest levels of activity on resolutions of inquiry during the 64 years studied. Although nearly every standing House committee has been referred at least one resolution of inquiry during the post-World War II period, the Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, and the Judiciary have received the largest share of references because the most commonly sought information has related to defense, foreign relations, and intelligence. Most resolutions of inquiry are directed to the President himself, but other executive branch officials have been the subject of such information requests as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Catholic Trade Unionists: Detroit Records
    THE ASSOCIATION OF CATHOLIC TRADE UNIONISTS- DETROIT 38 Manuscript Boxes 1 Paige Box Processed: Nov. 21, 1968 Accession Number 291 By: MAB The papers of Association of Catholic Trade Unionists- Detroit were deposited with the Labor History Archives in April 26, 1968 by Mrs. William Ryan. The Association of Catholic Trade Unionists was a liberal Catholic group whose purpose was to "strengthen the union, promote their success and to prepare them for their role in a new age of economic democracy." The main effort of the Detroit chapter lay in publishing a paper, the Michigan Labor Leader, which eventually became the Wage Earner. The paper's main campaign was against communism. In addition to the paper, the Association of Catholic Trade Unionist promoted labor schools for union members where the problems of religion and labor were discussed. Members of the Association of Catholic Trade Unionists and the labor schools came from a variety of locals in the area. Protestants were also invited to join. In the Detroit area the Association of Catholic Trade Unionists received support from Edward Cardinal Mooney as well as other religious leaders. Paul Weber, later press secretary to G. Mennen Williams, was President of the Association of Catholic Trade Unionists from 1939-47. William Ryan, later Democratic Speaker of the House in Michigan, was President from 1954-61. Richard Deverall was Executive Secretary for a time in the early 1940's. In 1957 the Detroit chapter disassociated itself from the national group and became the Detroit Catholic Labor Conference. The ACTU - Detroit Collection covers the period from 1938 to 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography & Milestones
    Biography & Milestones Biography Born July 8, 1926, in Colorado Springs, CO Educated at the Capitol Page School and Georgetown Preparatory School (Garrett Park, MD) Page, United States House of Representative, 1938–1943 B.S., Georgetown University, 1949 J.D., Georgetown University Law School, 1952 United States Army, 1944–1946 Worked as a private practice lawyer; legal research assistant; prosecuting attorney for Wayne County, MI Delegate to five Democratic National Conventions Elected by special election to the 84th Congress (1955-1957), to fill the vacancy caused by the death of his father, United States Representative John D. Dingell, Sr., December 13, 1955. The youngest Member in the 84th Congress upon his election at 29 years, 5 months, 6 days. (The oldest Member of the Michigan delegation at that time was Representative Clare Hoffman, born in 1875.) Re-elected to the 29 succeeding Congresses (84th Congress to 113th Congress, 1955–2015). Was not a candidate for re-election to the 114th Congress in 2014. Succeeded by his wife, Representative Debbie Dingell. Length of Service From December 13, 1955, to January 3, 2015, a total of 21,572 days (59 Collection of the U.S. House of Representatives About this object years, 22 days). The next longest serving Member of Congress was Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia, who served 20,996 days (combined House and Senate service). Dingell surpassed Byrd’s service record on June 7, 2013. Familial Connection John Dingell, Sr., John Dingell, Jr., and Debbie Dingell have the longest consecutive service for a single family. The total consecutive service for father, son, and wife/daughter-in-law from March 4, 1933 to present is 31,353 days (85 years, 10 months, 1 day); this figure is as of January 3, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolutions of Inquiry: an Analysis of Their Use in the House, 1947-2017
    Resolutions of Inquiry: An Analysis of Their Use in the House, 1947-2017 Christopher M. Davis Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process November 9, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40879 Resolutions of Inquiry: An Analysis of Their Use in the House, 1947-2017 Summary A resolution of inquiry is a simple resolution making a direct request or demand of the President or the head of an executive department to furnish the House with specific factual information in the Administration’s possession. Under the rules and precedents of the House of Representatives, such resolutions, if properly drafted, are given a privileged parliamentary status. This means that, under certain circumstances, a resolution of inquiry can be brought to the House floor for consideration even if the committee to which it was referred has not reported it and the majority party leadership has not scheduled it for action. Between 1947 and October 20, 2017, 313 resolutions of inquiry were submitted in the House of Representatives. Two periods in particular, 1971-1975 and 2003-2006, saw the highest levels of activity on resolutions of inquiry during the 70 years studied. Early evidence suggests that the House may be entering another period of heightened activity on resolutions of inquiry: The number of such resolutions submitted thus far in the 115th Congress (2017-2018) already exceeds the number introduced in the previous three Congresses combined. Although nearly every standing House committee has been referred at least one resolution of inquiry during the post-World War II period, the Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, and the Judiciary have received the largest share of references because the most commonly sought information has related to matters of defense, foreign relations, and intelligence.
    [Show full text]