Christchurch City Council Agenda 24 April 2013
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MINUTES MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL HELD AT 9.30AM ON WEDNESDAY 24 APRIL 2013 PRESENT: The Mayor, Bob Parker (Chairperson). Councillors Peter Beck, Helen Broughton, Sally Buck, Ngaire Button, Tim Carter, Jimmy Chen, Barry Corbett, Jamie Gough, Aaron Keown, Glenn Livingstone, Yani Johanson, Claudia Reid and Sue Wells. 1. APOLOGIES Nil. 2. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT The following people and groups made deputations to the Council on the following reports: Marcus Brandick on behalf of the Parklands, Tumara Park and Waitikiri Residents’ Associations regarding item 5.1 Parklands/Bottle Lake Plantation – Fletchers Temporary Yard site in the report from the Chairperson of the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board. Linda Stewart, Chairperson of the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board regarding item 5.1 Parklands/Bottle Lake Plantation – Fletchers Temporary Yard site. Hospitality New Zealand Canterbury Branch – Peter Morrison regarding item 8.1 Planning Committee Report to Council - Local Alcohol Policy – Formative Policy. District Commander Superintendent Gary Knowles regarding item 8.1 Planning Committee Report to Council - Local Alcohol Policy – Formative Policy. Dr Alistair Humphrey, Medical Officer of Health for Canterbury regarding item 8.1 Planning Committee Report to Council - Local Alcohol Policy – Formative Policy. Marjorie Manthei and Dave Kelly from Victoria Neighbourhood Association regarding item 8.1 Planning Committee Report to Council - Local Alcohol Policy – Formative Policy. Brett Giddens regarding item 8.1 Planning Committee Report to Council - Local Alcohol Policy – Formative Policy. Doug Hobbs and Gary Howse regarding item 9.2, Infrastructure Rebuild Monthly Report in the Environment and Infrastructure Report re Project 10976 NE13 Beach road and Bower Avenue. Ian Fox, Chairperson, Christchurch West Melton Water Management Zone Committee regarding the Zone Implementation Programme item 11. Richard Simpson, Chairperson, Community Representative from the Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone Committee regarding Zone Implementation Programmes item 11. Neil Roberts, Chairman Bruce Robertson Anne Dingwall and Christchurch Civic Trust and Martin Meehan regarding item 13 Hagley Oval Stage 1 Funding. Ali Jones and Mike Coleman regarding item 16 Insurance Advocacy Service. 3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - COUNCIL MEETINGS OF 28 MARCH 2013 AND 11 APRIL 2013 It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Buck, seconded by Councillor Keown, that the open minutes of the Council meetings held on 28 March 2013 and 11 April 2013, be confirmed. COUNCIL 30. 5. 2013 CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL 24. 4. 2013 - 2 - The Council dealt with the agenda in the following order: 5. REPORT BY THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE BURWOOD/PEGASUS COMMUNITY BOARD 15 APRIL 2013 (1.) PARKLANDS/BOTTLE LAKE PLANTATION - FLETCHER’S TEMPORARY YARD SITE It was resolved unanimously on the motion of Councillor Keown, seconded by Councillor Beck, that pursuant to clause 5(b)(i) of the Canterbury Earthquake (Reserves Legislation) Order 2011, that the Council: (a) Authorise the siting of a temporary yard and the installation of security fencing within QEII (Pt LOT 1 DP 10381) for use by SCIRT through its delivery teams, an area of approximately 8300 m2 as is approximately depicted on the SCIRT plan attached (refer Attachment 1). (b) Agree that the period for which the authority referred to in paragraph (a) of this recommendation shall apply is that period commencing on the date of this authority until the expiry of the Order in Council on 18 April 2016 or until a date the Council shall determine the hub is no longer required, whichever is the sooner, as set out in the current warrant. (c) Approve for the non-charging of a rental to SCIRT for their occupation of the park land on which their temporary buildings and yard will be placed, because this is a SCIRT project being undertaken to repair the city’s infrastructure. (d) The warrant be prepared to reflect the portable building and security fencing being placed upon the site, and the plan of the site on which is shown the position of the site be appended to the warrant. (e) Before any work commences on the site, the applicants will be required to: i. Meet the Operations & Events Leader to sign a temporary access agreement and pay a bond (which is refundable less any costs incurred be the Council). ii. Ensure all contractors working on the site have a minimum of $2,000,000 public liability insurance. iii. Ensure all services to the proposed site are laid underground. 6. REPORT BY THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE SPREYDON/HEATHCOTE COMMUNITY BOARD 19 APRIL 2013 (1.) STRICKLAND STREET/ANTIGUA STREET AND BROUGHAM STREET PROPOSED INTERSECTION CHANGES It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Corbett, seconded by Councillor Wells, that the Council approve the lane changes shown on the attached plan (Plan TP 325601) in the agenda be approved. Councillor Keown abstained from voting on this item. COUNCIL 30. 5. 2013 CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL 24. 4. 2013 - 3 - 7. COMMUNITY, RECREATION AND CULTURE COMMITTEE 2 APRIL 2013 (1.) FACILITIES REBUILD PLAN MONTHLY STATUS UPDATE It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Johanson, seconded by Councillor Gough, that the Council receive this report and; (a) Note that the Committee request staff to bring an urgent report to the Council in regard to options for the Scarborough Jetboat Building, which is an emergency services building. (b) Note that the Committee request staff to: Consider reopening the foyer and the boardroom of 1968 addition of the Riccarton Community Centre for public use as soon as possible. Respond to the Central Riccarton Residents’ Association deputation and report back to the next Community, Recreation and Culture Committee meeting on action to be taken. (c) Agree in principle that the Redcliffs Public Library be re-established on the 91 Main Road, Redcliffs site and that the insurance proceeds are ring-fenced for this purpose. (d) Ask Council staff to work with the Redcliffs Public Library Inc. committee on the options for the rebuild. (2.) PROPOSED DEMOLITION OF AN IMPLEMENT SHED LOCATED IN SOUTH HAGLEY PARK It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Johanson, seconded by Councillor Corbett, that the Council agree to the demolition of the implement shed located in South Hagley Park. (3.) INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS POLICY REVIEW Councillor Johanson moved, seconded by Councillor Chen, that the Council: (a) Approve the proposed process for the review of the International Relations Policy. (b) Approve the proposed terms of reference for a working party of the Committee to oversee the review with the following amendments: Nominate Councillors Johanson, Button and Beck to serve on the working party. Amend terms of reference on membership to include a Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade representative. The motion was put to the meeting on a clause by clause basis. Clause (a) was declared carried on electronic vote No. 1 by 10 votes to 4, the voting being as follows: For (10): Councillors Beck, Button, Carter, Chen, Corbett, Gough, Johanson, Keown, Livingstone and Wells. Against (4): The Mayor and Councillors Broughton, Buck and Reid. Clause (b) was declared carried. COUNCIL 30. 5. 2013 CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL 24. 4. 2013 - 4 - 7 Cont’d It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Johanson, seconded by Councillor Livingstone, that the report as a whole be adopted. The Council adjourned at 12.45 pm and resumed at 1.30 pm. 8. REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE OF 3 APRIL 2013 (1.) LOCAL ALCOHOL POLICY – FORMATIVE POLICY It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Wells, seconded by Councillor Reid, that Council receive the report and refer it to the Planning Committee for staff and stakeholder discussion. 23. PROPOSED TIMEFRAME FOR DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW It was resolved unanimously on the motion of Councillor Wells, seconded by Councillor Reid, that the Council: (a) Approve the proposed timeframe for the review programme as per attachments 1 and 2, with the first year primarily focussed on the “recovery” components to be pursued under the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011 (Land Use Recovery Plan) and the remaining District Plan components (i.e. “non-recovery”) to be pursued under an expedited Resource Management Act process. (b) Ensure that any direction preserves sufficient scope for the Council and the Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery to review and amend the existing programme. (c) Authorise the General Manager Strategy and Planning and the Chair of the Planning Committee to engage in discussions with government officials over an expedited Resource Management process for those components of the District Plan Review which are not primarily recovery related. (d) Authorise the General Manager Strategy and Planning and the Chair of the Planning Committee to discuss appropriate provisions for the Land Use Recovery Programme document to allow the Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery to consider a statutory direction to the prioritised review of the District Plan, as per the attached programme. Also to discuss provisions to confirm the processes: to agree the scope of recovery parts of the Plan; for consultation; for hearings and recommendations to give effect to each section/chapter of the Plan in a timely and efficient manner. (e) Ensure there is a clear process of dialogue in circumstances where the Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery intends or wishes to vary significantly from any recommendations made to him. (f) Establish protocols for how the “recovery” and remaining parts of the review will be conducted in particular, liaison between the Council and other key stakeholders where appropriate, including Environment Canterbury, Ngai Tahu, the Ministry for the Environment, and the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority. COUNCIL 30. 5. 2013 CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL 24. 4. 2013 - 5 - 23 Cont’d (g) Determine a process for how “recovery” focussed and other remaining elements of the Plan may be progressed to ensure the District Plan is efficiently and effectively reviewed, while ensuring that all parts of the review are carried out in a legally robust and effective manner.