Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species Items Atlantic, Western Central C-31 Poissons, Crustacés, Mollus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species Items Atlantic, Western Central C-31 Poissons, Crustacés, Mollus 497 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Atlantic, Western Central C-31 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Atlantique, centre-ouest (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Atlántico, centro-occidental English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t American eel Anguilla rostrata 22 127 1 0 0 ... - 0 American shad Alosa sapidissima 24 156 120 142 117 36 109 56 Alewife Alosa pseudoharengus 24 - 0 - - - - ... Hickory shad Alosa mediocris 24 0 - - 1 0 1 3 Threadfin shad Dorosoma petenense 24 0 - - 9 0 7 - Yellowfin river pellona Pellona flavipinnis 24 25 23 18 23 20 27 25 Lefteye flounders nei Bothidae 31 45 41 128 117 133 99 102 Tonguefishes Cynoglossidae 31 - - - 12 - - - Summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus 31 2 3 4 3 1 0 ... Flatfishes nei Pleuronectiformes 31 278 210 104 103 176 118 195 Gadiformes nei Gadiformes 32 301 165 345 214 217 239 243 Ladyfish Elops saurus 33 1 150 1 541 2 161 1 160 2 632 1 463 2 417 Tarpon Megalops atlanticus 33 216 117 321 166 198 221 161 Bonefish Albula vulpes 33 160 ... 161 207 135 138 167 Madamango sea catfish Cathorops spixii 33 ... ... ... ... 1 852 1 910 1 910 Crucifix sea catfish Arius proops 33 ... ... ... ... 1 191 1 225 1 225 Gafftopsail sea catfish Bagre marinus 33 ... ... ... ... 495 510 510 Sea catfishes nei Ariidae 33 7 587 9 062 8 777 9 518 6 455 7 782 7 086 Squirrelfishes nei Holocentridae 33 417 403 405 189 34 83 45 Flathead grey mullet Mugil cephalus 33 10 252 10 804 12 302 7 290 12 371 9 917 14 034 Lebranche mullet Mugil liza 33 1 552 2 083 2 592 2 242 2 480 2 565 2 557 White mullet Mugil curema 33 3 086 3 257 3 649 4 592 4 989 5 040 5 637 Parassi mullet Mugil incilis 33 59 54 41 53 45 62 56 Bobo mullet Joturus pichardi 33 233 218 228 358 324 397 363 Mullets nei Mugilidae 33 792 1 358 1 466 3 641 4 577 3 874 2 595 Swordspine snook Centropomus ensiferus 33 ... ... ... ... 99 100 100 Common snook Centropomus undecimalis 33 1 690 1 970 2 295 1 489 3 035 2 882 3 155 Snooks(=Robalos) nei Centropomus spp 33 6 838 6 767 6 385 8 356 6 960 9 435 7 424 Black grouper Mycteroperca bonaci 33 22 21 25 25 14 15 16 Gag Mycteroperca microlepis 33 386 430 415 383 562 323 344 Scamp Mycteroperca phenax 33 191 177 150 141 188 126 95 Yellowfin grouper Mycteroperca venenosa 33 1 1 1 1 121 125 125 Yellowmouth grouper Mycteroperca interstitialis 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Brazilian groupers nei Mycteroperca spp 33 ... 1 683 1 520 1 822 1 327 2 022 1 486 Nassau grouper Epinephelus striatus 33 101 105 173 83 51 101 102 Rock hind Epinephelus adscensionis 33 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 Speckled hind Epinephelus drummondhayi 33 23 19 38 30 23 28 32 Yellowedge grouper Epinephelus flavolimbatus 33 360 364 427 400 387 372 2 Red hind Epinephelus guttatus 33 208 218 238 212 174 162 162 Red grouper Epinephelus morio 33 2 875 2 567 3 112 2 659 2 492 1 872 1 381 Misty grouper Epinephelus mystacinus 33 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 Snowy grouper Epinephelus niveatus 33 127 91 122 106 160 150 83 Warsaw grouper Epinephelus nigritus 33 47 55 41 29 24 24 9 Groupers nei Epinephelus spp 33 1 444 1 920 2 566 1 239 1 102 1 188 1 129 Black seabass Centropristis striata 33 379 346 167 100 101 110 107 Rock sea bass Centropristis philadelphica 33 26 26 1 15 7 4 ... Graysby Cephalopholis cruentata 33 0 1 0 0 0 0 - Coney Cephalopholis fulva 33 54 67 70 67 142 154 144 Groupers, seabasses nei Serranidae 33 12 490 10 457 7 554 10 963 8 999 11 896 10 080 Atlantic bigeye Priacanthus arenatus 33 2 1 3 0 99 100 100 Bigeyes nei Priacanthus spp 33 - - 0 - - - ... Sand tilefish Malacanthus plumieri 33 3 6 7 7 7 7 7 Mutton snapper Lutjanus analis 33 85 94 122 122 236 259 276 Southern red snapper Lutjanus purpureus 33 1 820 1 926 2 893 1 798 2 216 2 390 2 578 Blackfin snapper Lutjanus buccanella 33 14 18 15 14 12 13 10 Northern red snapper Lutjanus campechanus 33 5 063 5 497 5 999 7 269 7 935 7 746 8 666 Cubera snapper Lutjanus cyanopterus 33 339 456 461 418 495 464 554 Grey snapper Lutjanus griseus 33 528 525 568 514 733 526 774 Lane snapper Lutjanus synagris 33 1 994 1 465 1 368 1 656 2 100 1 993 1 787 Silk snapper Lutjanus vivanus 33 70 67 102 97 82 69 70 Snappers nei Lutjanus spp 33 1 075 1 190 979 782 554 500 883 Yellowtail snapper Ocyurus chrysurus 33 4 266 4 010 4 104 4 342 5 172 4 820 5 358 Black snapper Apsilus dentatus 33 5 3 2 1 1 4 1 Queen snapper Etelis oculatus 33 51 42 88 95 17 4 5 Wenchman Pristipomoides aquilonaris 33 ... ... 9 6 90 90 95 Cardinal snapper Pristipomoides macrophthalmus 33 4 4 8 8 ... ... ... Vermilion snapper Rhomboplites aurorubens 33 2 123 2 096 2 079 2 161 3 254 3 160 3 419 Snappers, jobfishes nei Lutjanidae 33 8 396 7 945 6 525 6 093 4 079 4 536 4 649 White margate Haemulon album 33 9 11 - - - - ... White grunt Haemulon plumierii 33 241 1 427 1 315 1 405 2 190 1 555 2 450 Tomtate grunt Haemulon aurolineatum 33 ... ... ... ... 337 350 350 Grunts nei Haemulon spp 33 3 3 4 4 2 1 2 Pigfish Orthopristis chrysoptera 33 3 2 2 2 4 3 2 Corocoro grunt Orthopristis ruber 33 ... ... ... ... 1 930 1 990 1 990 Barred grunt Conodon nobilis 33 254 229 308 316 461 456 507 Grunts, sweetlips nei Haemulidae (=Pomadasyidae) 33 3 026 5 219 5 637 8 520 5 822 6 859 6 416 Acoupa weakfish Cynoscion acoupa 33 ... ... ... ... 2 310 2 380 2 380 Sand weakfish Cynoscion arenarius 33 29 20 21 8 8 6 8 Jamaica weakfish Cynoscion jamaicensis 33 ... ... ... ... 660 680 680 Smooth weakfish Cynoscion leiarchus 33 ... ... ... ... 420 435 435 Spotted weakfish Cynoscion nebulosus 33 241 794 888 1 510 812 1 673 905 Squeteague(=Gray weakfish) Cynoscion regalis 33 15 5 2 3 3 7 3 Green weakfish Cynoscion virescens 33 ... ... ... ... 643 665 665 Weakfishes nei Cynoscion spp 33 7 484 9 055 8 832 8 693 5 500 5 745 6 181 Whitemouth croaker Micropogonias furnieri 33 1 833 1 570 1 299 1 109 2 926 3 015 3 015 Atlantic croaker Micropogonias undulatus 33 96 97 66 99 78 73 85 498 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Atlantic, Western Central C-31 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Atlantique, centre-ouest (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Atlántico, centro-occidental English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Gulf kingcroaker Menticirrhus littoralis 33 442 383 347 285 370 358 453 King weakfish Macrodon ancylodon 33 ... ... ... ... 828 850 850 Black drum Pogonias cromis 33 2 761 2 657 2 822 2 933 2 852 2 467 2 008 Spot croaker Leiostomus xanthurus 33 24 82 25 27 70 30 44 Red drum Sciaenops ocellatus 33 16 17 24 28 27 26 22 Croakers, drums nei Sciaenidae 33 89 114 98 106 210 272 263 Spottail seabream Diplodus holbrooki 33 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Grass porgy Calamus arctifrons 33 - - 2 1 1 1 - Jolthead porgy Calamus bajonado 33 10 8 13 14 16 17 9 Porgies Calamus spp 33 276 274 321 328 225 201 200 Sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus 33 538 846 742 558 577 531 820 Western Atlantic seabream Archosargus rhomboidalis 33 21 15 14 22 1 1 1 Red porgy Pagrus pagrus 33 217 155 170 142 111 93 76 Pinfish Lagodon rhomboides 33 20 67 82 44 46 47 48 Porgies, seabreams nei Sparidae 33 1 083 147 151 112 240 529 194 Goatfishes, red mullets nei Mullidae 33 91 112 130 104 7 9 24 Mojarras(=Silver-biddies) nei Gerres spp 33 123 144 176 144 205 194 218 Mojarras, etc. nei Gerreidae 33 2 300 2 644 2 836 3 050 3 020 2 922 3 020 Sea chubs nei Kyphosidae 33 8 1 3 1 1 1 2 Creole wrasse Clepticus parrae 33 2 4 3 3 1 - - Hogfish Lachnolaimus maximus 33 290 977 1 423 1 683 2 235 1 893 2 502 Wrasses, hogfishes, etc. nei Labridae 33 138 141 146 156 28 23 32 Parrotfishes nei Scaridae 33 399 369 399 308 334 437 189 Angelfishes nei Pomacanthidae 33 20 2 2 19 19 19 19 Surgeonfishes nei Acanthuridae 33 180 136 113 163 170 179 180 Spadefishes nei Ephippidae 33 5 11 7 - - 5 7 Boxfishes nei Ostraciidae 33 88 65 78 54 65 63 65 Atlantic puffers nei Sphoeroides spp 33 5 4 4 1 2 1 4 Filefishes, leatherjackets nei Monacanthidae 33 26 2 6 8 8 8 8 Grey triggerfish Balistes carolinensis 33 6 51 38 110 102 104 94 Queen triggerfish Balistes vetula 33 1 3 4 2 2 1 - Triggerfishes, durgons nei Balistidae 33 383 293 310 324 232 237 214 American conger Conger oceanicus 34 0 0 0 0 0 1 - Bearded brotula Brotula barbata 34 1 1 - - - - ..
Recommended publications
  • Invasion of Asian Tiger Shrimp, Penaeus Monodon Fabricius, 1798, in the Western North Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico
    Aquatic Invasions (2014) Volume 9, Issue 1: 59–70 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2014.9.1.05 Open Access © 2014 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2014 REABIC Research Article Invasion of Asian tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon Fabricius, 1798, in the western north Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Pam L. Fuller1*, David M. Knott2, Peter R. Kingsley-Smith3, James A. Morris4, Christine A. Buckel4, Margaret E. Hunter1 and Leslie D. Hartman 1U.S. Geological Survey, Southeast Ecological Science Center, 7920 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL 32653, USA 2Poseidon Taxonomic Services, LLC, 1942 Ivy Hall Road, Charleston, SC 29407, USA 3Marine Resources Research Institute, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, 217 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC 29422, USA 4Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, 101 Pivers Island Road, Beaufort, NC 28516, USA 5Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 2200 Harrison Street, Palacios, TX 77465, USA E-mail: [email protected] (PLF), [email protected] (DMK), [email protected] (PRKS), [email protected] (JAM), [email protected] (CAB), [email protected] (MEH), [email protected] (LDH) *Corresponding author Received: 28 August 2013 / Accepted: 20 February 2014 / Published online: 7 March 2014 Handling editor: Amy Fowler Abstract After going unreported in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean for 18 years (1988 to 2006), the Asian tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon, has recently reappeared in the South Atlantic Bight and, for the first time ever, in the Gulf of Mexico. Potential vectors and sources of this recent invader include: 1) discharged ballast water from its native range in Asia or other areas where it has become established; 2) transport of larvae from established non-native populations in the Caribbean or South America via ocean currents; or 3) escape and subsequent migration from active aquaculture facilities in the western Atlantic.
    [Show full text]
  • Penaeus Brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817)
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Species Fact Sheets Penaeus brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817) Penaeus brasiliensis: (click for more) Synonyms Penaeus (Melicertus) brasiliensis Perez-Farfante, 1969 FAO Names En - Redspotted shrimp, Fr - Crevette royale rose, Sp - Camarón rosado con manchas. 3Alpha Code: PNB Taxonomic Code: 2280100119 Scientific Name with Original Description Penaeus (Farfantepenaeus) brasiliensis Latreille, 1817. Nouv.Dict.Hist.Nat. 25:156. Geographical Distribution FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Launch the Aquatic Species Distribution map viewer Western Atlantic: Atlantic coast of America from North Carolina (U.S.A) to Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil); Bermuda; West Indies. Habitat and Biology Bottom mud and sand. Juveniles are estuarine, adults marine. Bathymetry: from 3 to 365 m, most abundant at 45 to 65 m. Size Maximum total length 191 mm (female) 150 mm (male). Interest to Fisheries In the northern part of its range (West Indies, coast of U.S.A.) it usually forms a small percentage of the total shrimp catch. It is quite important in some localities on the Caribbean coast of Central and South America (Quintana Roo (Mexico), Nicaragua, E. Venezuela), and is especially important off the Atlantic coast of South America from Guyana to northern Brazil (Baia de Marajó), where it produces "gigantic catches" (Perez- Farfante, 1969:576). In northeastern Brazil the commercial value of the species is limited, but more to the south, in Rio de Janeiro state it is quite important again. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Global Capture Production for species (tonnes) Source: FAO FishStat 15k 10k 5k 0k 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Penaeus brasiliensis Local Names U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Tiger Prawn (Penaeus Esculentus)
    I & I NSW WILD FISHERIES RESEARCH PROGRAM Brown Tiger Prawn (Penaeus esculentus) EXPLOITATION STATUS UNDEFINED NSW is at the southern end of the species’ range. Recruitment is likely to be small and variable. SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME COMMENT Penaeus esculentus brown tiger prawn Native to NSW waters Also known as leader prawn and giant Penaeus monodon black tiger prawn tiger prawn - farmed in NSW. Penaeus esculentus Image © Bernard Yau Background There are a number of large striped ‘tiger’ prawns waters in mud, sand or silt substrates less than known from Australian waters. Species such as 30 m deep. Off northern Australia, female brown the black tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon) and tiger prawns mature between 2.5 and 3.5 cm grooved tiger prawn (P. semisulcatus) have wide carapace length (CL) and grow to a maximum of tropical distributions throughout the Indo-West about 5.5 cm CL; males grow to a maximum of Pacific and northern Australia. The brown tiger about 4 cm CL. Spawning occurs mainly in water prawn (P. esculentus) is also mainly tropical but temperatures around 28-30°C, and the resulting appears to be endemic to Australia, inhabiting planktonic larvae are dispersed by coastal shallow coastal waters and estuaries from currents back into the estuaries to settle. central NSW (Sydney), around the north of the continent, to Shark Bay in WA. This species is Compared to northern Australian states, the fished commercially throughout its range and NSW tiger prawn catch is extremely small. Since contributes almost 30% of the ~1800 t tiger 2000, reported landings have been between prawn fishery (70% grooved tiger prawn) in the 3 and 6 t per year, with about half taken Northern Prawn Fishery of northern Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Research and Management
    Marine Research and Management Editors V.N. Pillai and N.G. Menon Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (Indian Council of Agricultural Research) Tatapuram P.O., Cochin-682 014 Kerala, India 2000 The Indian tiger prawn Penaeiis monodon 33 Fabricius G. Sudhakara Rao ABSTRACT The largest penaeid Indian tiger prawn, Penaeus wanodon is widely distributed in the Indian waters and forms an important fish­ ery with high demand in tthe export market. By virtue ojits fast growth, hardness and export demand it is cultured in about 1 lakh ha of prawn farms with an annual yield of 82850 t. As the demand is very high it is subjected to heavy fishing pressure at laa stages of life history, seeds and brooders for farm and hatchery and all others for internal and export markets. The paper reviews the work done on its distribu­ tion, biology and capture fisheries from estuaries and marine habitats together with its stock assessment and management measures to keep the ujild population sustainable. Introduction The Indian tiger prawn P. monodon Fabricius is the largest species among the penaeids. P"or a long time there was confusion In the identification of this species. The designation of a neotype in place of the lost original type of Fabricius by Holthuis (1949) has finally resolved the century-long confusion of this species with P. semisulcatus de Haan. Although P. monodon is widely distributed throughout the Indo-Pacific region, ranging from South Africa to Southern Japan, and from Karachi to northern New South Wales, it forms commercial fisheries only in the central part of the Indo-Pacific region (Mohamed, 1970; Motoh, 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • The Brown Shrimp Penaeus Aztecus Ives, 1891 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae) in the Nile Delta, Egypt: an Exploitable Resource for Fishery and Mariculture?
    BioInvasions Records (2018) Volume 7, Issue 1: 51–54 Open Access DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2018.7.1.07 © 2018 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2018 REABIC Rapid Communication The brown shrimp Penaeus aztecus Ives, 1891 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae) in the Nile Delta, Egypt: an exploitable resource for fishery and mariculture? Sherif Sadek¹, Walid Abou El-Soud2 and Bella S. Galil3,* 1Aquaculture Consultant Office, 9 Road 256 Maadi, Cairo, Egypt 2Egyptian Mariculture Company, Dibah Triangle Zone, Manzala Lake, Port-Said, Egypt 3The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 21 October 2017 / Accepted: 12 January 2018 / Published online: 27 January 2018 Handling editor: Cynthia McKenzie Abstract The penaeid shrimp Penaeus aztecus is recorded for the first time from Egypt. The West Atlantic species was first noted off Damietta, on the Mediterranean coast of Egypt, in 2012. This species has already been recorded in the Mediterranean Sea from the southeastern Levant to the Gulf of Lion, France. The impacts of the introduction of P. aztecus on the local biota, and in particular on the native and previously introduced penaeids, are as yet unknown. Shrimp farmers at the northern Nile Delta have been cultivating P. aztecus since 2016, depending on postlarvae and juveniles collected from the wild in the Damietta branch of the Nile estuary. Key words: brown shrimp, first record, non-indigenous species, shrimp farming, wild fry Introduction Italy, Montenegro, and Turkey (for recent distribution maps see Galil et al. 2017; Scannella et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrimp Farming in the Asia-Pacific: Environmental and Trade Issues and Regional Cooperation
    Shrimp Farming in the Asia-Pacific: Environmental and Trade Issues and Regional Cooperation Recommended Citation J. Honculada Primavera, "Shrimp Farming in the Asia-Pacific: Environmental and Trade Issues and Regional Cooperation", trade and environment, September 25, 1994, https://nautilus.org/trade-an- -environment/shrimp-farming-in-the-asia-pacific-environmental-and-trade-issues-- nd-regional-cooperation-4/ J. Honculada Primavera Aquaculture Department Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines 5021 Tel 63-33-271009 Fax 63-33-271008 Presented at the Nautilus Institute Workshop on Trade and Environment in Asia-Pacific: Prospects for Regional Cooperation 23-25 September 1994 East-West Center, Honolulu Abstract Production of farmed shrimp has grown at the phenomenal rate of 20-30% per year in the last two decades. The leading shrimp producers are in the Asia-Pacific region while the major markets are in Japan, the U.S.A. and Europe. The dramatic failures of shrimp farms in Taiwan, Thailand, Indonesia and China within the last five years have raised concerns about the sustainability of shrimp aquaculture, in particular intensive farming. After a brief background on shrimp farming, this paper reviews its environmental impacts and recommends measures that can be undertaken on the farm, 1 country and regional levels to promote long-term sustainability of the industry. Among the environmental effects of shrimp culture are the loss of mangrove goods and services as a result of conversion, salinization of soil and water, discharge of effluents resulting in pollution of the pond system itself and receiving waters, and overuse or misuse of chemicals. Recommendations include the protection and restoration of mangrove habitats and wild shrimp stocks, management of pond effluents, regulation of chemical use and species introductions, and an integrated coastal area management approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Explorando La Biodiversidad Marina En Colombia
    1 Contenido Carta a la Presidenta de la Junta Directiva 3 Antecedentes 5 Estructura orgánica 7 Miembros 9 Composición de la Junta Directiva 11 Composición del Consejo Científico 15 Composición del Cuerpo Directivo 17 Cinco años fortaleciendo el SINA 19 PFI Plan de Fortalecimiento Institucional 27 Investigación Explorando la biodiversidad marina en Colombia 43 Más allá del potencial de los recursos 53 Una contribución para garantizar un ambiente sano 65 Información para la gestión 75 Ciencia y empresa: Objetivos comunes 93 Contribuciones científicas indexadas 101 Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras 121 Publicaciones especiales 127 Informes anuales 133 Convenios 135 Cartografía digital 145 Apoyo a la investigación Oficina de Planeación 165 Oficina Jurídica 169 Oficina de Relaciones Externas 171 Oficina de Control de Calidad 173 Subdirección de Apoyo Logístico 177 Subdirección Financiera y Administrativa 187 Información financiera 203 · Carta de la Revisoría Fiscal · Estados Financieros a Diciembre 31 de 2000 · Notas a los Estados Financieros Equipo humano 213 2 3 Santa Marta, D.T.C.H., 30 de marzo de 2001 Señora CLAUDIA MARTÍNEZ ZULETA Viceministra del Medio Ambiente Presidenta Junta Directiva Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras “José Benito Vives De Andréis” INVEMAR Santa Marta, D.T.C.H. Respetada señora Viceministra: Es grato presentarle el documento que resume los logros obtenidos durante el período correspondiente a mi gestión en el Instituto, enfatiza las realizaciones llevadas a cabo en el año 2000 y manifiesta la sinergia de esfuerzos incorporados por parte de todos sus integrantes. Respondiendo a las tendencias actuales en el manejo ambiental, el Instituto, como instrumento generador de conocimiento e información en el tema marino y costero, presenta avances significativos respecto a la cooperación científico-técnica que soportan algunos procesos de gestión y manejo de los recursos y ecosistemas, que coadyuvan al ordenamiento territorial en la región costera y a la toma de decisiones de política nacional y negociación internacional.
    [Show full text]
  • FISHES (C) Val Kells–November, 2019
    VAL KELLS Marine Science Illustration 4257 Ballards Mill Road - Free Union - VA - 22940 www.valkellsillustration.com [email protected] STOCK ILLUSTRATION LIST FRESHWATER and SALTWATER FISHES (c) Val Kells–November, 2019 Eastern Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico: brackish and saltwater fishes Subject to change. New illustrations added weekly. Atlantic hagfish, Myxine glutinosa Sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus Deepwater chimaera, Hydrolagus affinis Atlantic spearnose chimaera, Rhinochimaera atlantica Nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum Whale shark, Rhincodon typus Sand tiger, Carcharias taurus Ragged-tooth shark, Odontaspis ferox Crocodile Shark, Pseudocarcharias kamoharai Thresher shark, Alopias vulpinus Bigeye thresher, Alopias superciliosus Basking shark, Cetorhinus maximus White shark, Carcharodon carcharias Shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus Longfin mako, Isurus paucus Porbeagle, Lamna nasus Freckled Shark, Scyliorhinus haeckelii Marbled catshark, Galeus arae Chain dogfish, Scyliorhinus retifer Smooth dogfish, Mustelus canis Smalleye Smoothhound, Mustelus higmani Dwarf Smoothhound, Mustelus minicanis Florida smoothhound, Mustelus norrisi Gulf Smoothhound, Mustelus sinusmexicanus Blacknose shark, Carcharhinus acronotus Bignose shark, Carcharhinus altimus Narrowtooth Shark, Carcharhinus brachyurus Spinner shark, Carcharhinus brevipinna Silky shark, Carcharhinus faiformis Finetooth shark, Carcharhinus isodon Galapagos Shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis Bull shark, Carcharinus leucus Blacktip shark, Carcharhinus limbatus Oceanic whitetip shark,
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions and Solutions from Conservation Physiology
    Volume 9 • 2021 10.1093/conphys/coab038 Perspective The second warning to humanity: contributions and solutions from conservation physiology Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/conphys/article/9/1/coab038/6299938 by [email protected] on 18 June 2021 Christine L. Madliger1,*, Craig E. Franklin2,StevenL.Chown3, Andrea Fuller4, Kevin R. Hultine5, David Costantini6, William A. Hopkins7, Myron A. Peck8, Jodie L. Rummer9,LawrenSack10, Craig K.R. Willis11 and Steven J. Cooke1 1Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada 2School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia 3Securing Antarctica’s Environmental Future, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia 4Brain Function Research Group, School of Physiology, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Rd, Parktown, 2193, South Africa 5Department of Research, Conservation and Collections, Desert Botanical Garden, 1201 N. Galvin Parkway, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA 6Unité Physiologie Moléculaire et Adaptation (PhyMA), Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, 57 Rue Cuvier, CP32, 75005, Paris, France 7Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA 8Deparment of Coastal Systems (COS), Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), PO Box 59, NL-1790 AB, Den Burg (Texel), The Netherlands 9College
    [Show full text]
  • An Invitation to Monitor Georgia's Coastal Wetlands
    An Invitation to Monitor Georgia’s Coastal Wetlands www.shellfish.uga.edu By Mary Sweeney-Reeves, Dr. Alan Power, & Ellie Covington First Printing 2003, Second Printing 2006, Copyright University of Georgia “This book was prepared by Mary Sweeney-Reeves, Dr. Alan Power, and Ellie Covington under an award from the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of OCRM and NOAA.” 2 Acknowledgements Funding for the development of the Coastal Georgia Adopt-A-Wetland Program was provided by a NOAA Coastal Incentive Grant, awarded under the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Coastal Zone Management Program (UGA Grant # 27 31 RE 337130). The Coastal Georgia Adopt-A-Wetland Program owes much of its success to the support, experience, and contributions of the following individuals: Dr. Randal Walker, Marie Scoggins, Dodie Thompson, Edith Schmidt, John Crawford, Dr. Mare Timmons, Marcy Mitchell, Pete Schlein, Sue Finkle, Jenny Makosky, Natasha Wampler, Molly Russell, Rebecca Green, and Jeanette Henderson (University of Georgia Marine Extension Service); Courtney Power (Chatham County Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission); Dr. Joe Richardson (Savannah State University); Dr. Chandra Franklin (Savannah State University); Dr. Dionne Hoskins (NOAA); Dr. Charles Belin (Armstrong Atlantic University); Dr. Merryl Alber (University of Georgia); (Dr. Mac Rawson (Georgia Sea Grant College Program); Harold Harbert, Kim Morris-Zarneke, and Michele Droszcz (Georgia Adopt-A-Stream); Dorset Hurley and Aimee Gaddis (Sapelo Island National Estuarine Research Reserve); Dr. Charra Sweeney-Reeves (All About Pets); Captain Judy Helmey (Miss Judy Charters); Jan Mackinnon and Jill Huntington (Georgia Department of Natural Resources).
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Fish Biology Symposium,” We Are Including 48 Oral and Poster Papers on a Diverse Range of Species, Covering a Number of Topics
    Advances in Fish Biology SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS Adalberto Val Don MacKinlay International Congress on the Biology of Fish Tropical Hotel Resort, Manaus Brazil, August 1-5, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Physiology Section, American Fisheries Society All rights reserved International Standard Book Number(ISBN) 1-894337-44-1 Notice This publication is made up of a combination of extended abstracts and full papers, submitted by the authors without peer review. The formatting has been edited but the content is the responsibility of the authors. The papers in this volume should not be cited as primary literature. The Physiology Section of the American Fisheries Society offers this compilation of papers in the interests of information exchange only, and makes no claim as to the validity of the conclusions or recommendations presented in the papers. For copies of these Symposium Proceedings, or the other 20 Proceedings in the Congress series, contact: Don MacKinlay, SEP DFO, 401 Burrard St Vancouver BC V6C 3S4 Canada Phone: 604-666-3520 Fax 604-666-0417 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.fishbiologycongress.org ii PREFACE Fish are so important in our lives that they have been used in thousands of different laboratories worldwide to understand and protect our environment; to understand and ascertain the foundation of vertebrate evolution; to understand and recount the history of vertebrate colonization of isolated pristine environments; and to understand the adaptive mechanisms to extreme environmental conditions. More importantly, fish are one of the most important sources of protein for the human kind. Efforts at all levels have been made to increase fish production and, undoubtedly, the biology of fish, especially the biology of unknown species, has much to contribute.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab-Scale Demonstration of the UREX+ Process
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarsArchive@OSU IIFET 2010 Montpellier Proceedings A BIO-ECONOMIC MODEL FOR THE VIABLE MANAGEMENTOF THE COASTAL FISHERY IN FRENCH GUYANA Abdoul Cisse, UAG - IFREMER, [email protected] Sophie Gourguet, IFREMER – UBO, [email protected] Luc Doyen, CNRS-MNHN, [email protected] Jean Christophe Pereau, Université Bordeaux IV, [email protected] Fabian Blanchard, IFREMER, [email protected] Olivier Guyader, IFREMER, [email protected] ABSTRACT The coastal fishery in French Guyana is a challenging case study for the implementation of the ecosystem based fishery management. Although the current situation of this small scale fishery could be considered as satisfactory, the viability of the fishery can be questioned. Indeed according to demographic scenarios, the growth of the population will generate an increase of local food demand and therefore growing fishing pressures. Moreover, there is no direct regulation for limiting the fishing catches. Models and quantitative methods to tackle this sustainability issue are still lacking for such mall-scale fisheries mainly because of the various complexities underlying the systems including the heterogeneity of the production factors, the weak selectivity of fleets and high fish biodiversity levels. In the present paper, we both use numerical simulations and a viability perspective to deal with such a problem. We first build a multi- species multi-fleets dynamic model relying on thirteen exploited species and four types of fleets. It accounts for potential trophic interactions, fishing effort and the corresponding costs and revenues.
    [Show full text]