DOCSLIB.ORG

Use of Kin Address Terms in Punjabi Speech Community / Faryal Gill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Use of Kin Address Terms in Punjabi Speech Community / Faryal Gill About the author Ms. Faryal Gill holds an M.Phil. in Linguistics from University of Management and Technology and is presently serving as an assistant professor in the Department of English at Govt. College Women University, Sialkot. She has been teaching English and linguistics at graduate and undergraduate levels for the past thirteen years. She has also served as HEC Teacher's Trainer and conducted many training and workshop sessions on language teaching and developing communication skills. As an educationist, Miss Faryal represented Pakistan in 2018 in the US Consulate's International Visitors Leadership Program in USA. Ms. Faryal Gill has a special interest in probing the linguistic niceties of Pakistan's native languages with a pronounced focus on Punjabi (her own vernacular). She has been ardently working on identifying sociolinguistic aspects of Punjabi with a view to furthering research on Language Universals in the sociolinguistic domain. Her preferred areas of research include Sociolinguistics, Semantics, Pragmatics, Psycholinguistics and Language Teaching Methodology. Higher Education Commission, Islamabad USE OF KIN ADDRESS TERMS IN PUNJABI SPEECH COMMUNITY By Faryal Gill Department of English Govt. College Women University, Sialkot 2018 HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION ISLAMABAD - PAKISTAN i Copyrights @ Higher Education Commission Islamabad Lahore Karachi Peshawar Quetta All rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means – including, but not limited to, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or, otherwise or used for any commercial purpose what so ever without the prior written permission of the publisher and, if publisher considers necessary, formal license agreement with publisher may be executed. Project: “Monograph and Textbook Writing Scheme” aims to develop a culture of writing and to develop authorship cadre among teaching and researcher community of higher education institutions in the country. For information please visit: www.hec.gov.pk HEC – Cataloging in Publication (CIP Data): Gill, Faryal. Use of Kin Address Terms in Punjabi Speech Community / Faryal Gill. 1. Kinship 2. Kinship Address Use-Punjabi Community. I. TITTLE. II. ISBN: 978-969-417-217-0 828.91421 ddc23. First Edition: 2019 Electronic Version Only Published By: Higher Education Commission – Pakistan Disclaimer: The publisher has used its best efforts for this publication through a rigorous system of evaluation and quality standards, but does not assume, and hereby disclaims, any liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by the errors or omissions in this publication, whether such errors or emissions result from negligence, accident, or any other cause. i TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ...................................................................................................................... v PREFACE ......................................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................................... ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. xi CHAPTER-1 ........................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Background .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Three-fold Purpose .............................................................................................. 4 1.3. Kinship and Society .............................................................................................. 4 1.4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER – 2 ..................................................................................................................... 7 KINSHIP TRANSFORMATIONS .................................................................................... 7 2.1. Speech Communities and Kin Address Terms .................................................... 7 2.2. Classificatory and Descriptive Terms ................................................................... 9 2.3. Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER – 3 ................................................................................................................... 13 TAXONOMY OF KIN ADDRESS TERMS .................................................................... 13 3.1. Kin Classification System ................................................................................... 13 3.2. Kinship Universals .............................................................................................. 15 3.3. Kinship Universals and Componential Analysis ................................................. 17 3.4. Kinship Universals and Optimality Theory ......................................................... 18 3.5. Socio-linguistic Ramifications ............................................................................ 19 3.6. Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 22 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 23 4.1. Theoretical Bedrock ........................................................................................... 23 4.2. The Tool Box ...................................................................................................... 23 iii 4.3. Why Punjabi Language? .................................................................................... 24 4.4. Kinship in the Field ............................................................................................. 24 4.5. Punjabi Kinship Demography ............................................................................. 24 4.7. Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 25 5.1. Generation ......................................................................................................... 28 5.2. Collaterality versus Lineality .............................................................................. 29 5.3. Affinal Versus Consanguineal ............................................................................ 30 5.4. Sex of the Linking Relative ................................................................................ 32 5.5. Decadence (Condition of the Linking Relative) .................................................. 33 5.8. Kinship Behavior ................................................................................................ 36 5.9. Fluidity of Kin Address Terms ............................................................................ 38 5.10. Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 42 6.1. Use of Honorifics/Suffixes .................................................................................. 43 6.2. Using Two Terms for One Relative .................................................................... 43 6.3. Role of Sex ......................................................................................................... 44 6.4. Pronouns of Address .......................................................................................... 44 6.5. Pseudo Kinship .................................................................................................. 46 6.6. Husband, Wife Relationship ............................................................................... 46 6.7. Teknonymy ......................................................................................................... 47 6.8. Reasons of Inconsistencies in Spoken Accounts .............................................. 47 6.9. Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 48 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 51 .......................................................................................................................................... 51 APPENDIX-A .................................................................................................................... 56 APPENDIX-B .................................................................................................................... 60 .......................................................................................................................................... 60 APPENDIX-C .................................................................................................................... 73 GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................... 85 INDEX ............................................................................................................................... 87 .......................................................................................................................................... 87
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Poetics of Relationality: Mobility, Naming, and Sociability in Southeastern Senegal by Nikolas Sweet a Dissertation Submitte
    The Poetics of Relationality: Mobility, Naming, and Sociability in Southeastern Senegal By Nikolas Sweet A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee Professor Judith Irvine, chair Associate Professor Michael Lempert Professor Mike McGovern Professor Barbra Meek Professor Derek Peterson Nikolas Sweet [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3957-2888 © 2019 Nikolas Sweet This dissertation is dedicated to Doba and to the people of Taabe. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The field work conducted for this dissertation was made possible with generous support from the National Science Foundation’s Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant, the Wenner-Gren Foundation’s Dissertation Fieldwork Grant, the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program, and the University of Michigan Rackham International Research Award. Many thanks also to the financial support from the following centers and institutes at the University of Michigan: The African Studies Center, the Department of Anthropology, Rackham Graduate School, the Department of Afroamerican and African Studies, the Mellon Institute, and the International Institute. I wish to thank Senegal’s Ministère de l'Education et de la Recherche for authorizing my research in Kédougou. I am deeply grateful to the West African Research Center (WARC) for hosting me as a scholar and providing me a welcoming center in Dakar. I would like to thank Mariane Wade, in particular, for her warmth and support during my intermittent stays in Dakar. This research can be seen as a decades-long interest in West Africa that began in the Peace Corps in 2006-2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    BOOK REVIEWS DA VID F. GREENBERG, The Construction of Homosexuality, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press 1989. x, 499pp., References, Index. £23.95. This book richly merits the epithet 'magisterial' accorded it by its dust-jacket blurb. It is packed with ethnography, both social and historical facts. Greenberg points out that for an author to write the kind of book he has written by consulting primary sources would be unfeasible; so, quite legitimately, he relies upon the experts (so far as this reviewer is able to judge uncontroversially and fully). He is thus able to range over societies from all parts of the world and from all periods back as far as thousands of years before Christ. In doing so, he presents fascinating piCtures of the forms that homosexuality can take, and of the reactions of different groups, some of which (like the Church) included homosexualists, to it. In so doing, Greenberg is scrupulous in the weighing of evidences and in pointing out to his readers the factual fragility of some of the material he must rely upon. The Construction oj Homosexuality does not set out merely to record or to encyclopaedize, it seeks to explain why homosexuality has taken different forms socially and why these forms have sometimes incurred the displeasure of other groups (manifested in sometimes horrible and ugly sentences for those found guilty of some homosexual, but not exclusively homosexual, act or acts). The author does so by focusing on a set of questions such as: 'Why were some people tolerant and others highly intolerant? How had Western civilization come to be so repressive?' (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Social' Among the Zafimaniry of Madagascar
    Maurice Bloch Teknonymy and the evocation of the 'social' among the Zafimaniry of Madagascar Book section Original citation: Bloch, Maurice (2006) Teknonymy and the evocation of the 'social' among the Zafimaniry of Madagascar. In: vom Bruck, Gabriele and Bodenhorn, Barbara, (eds.) An anthropology of names and naming. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 97-114. © 2006 Cambridge University Press This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/8761/ Available in LSE Research Online: February 2010 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Teknonymy and the evocation of the “social” among the Zafimaniry of Madagascar.* *I would like to thank Rita Astuti and Eva Keller for very useful comments o an earlier draft. (published in Vom Bruck ed, the anthropology of names and naming) Introduction Names are words, and as words they are constituent elements in speech acts.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Organization III
    08Ch08_Miller.QXD 12/15/08 9:34 PM Page 198 PART Social Organization III 8 Kinship and Domestic Life Social Groups and Social 9 Stratification 10 Politics, Conflict, and Social Order 08Ch08_Miller.QXD 12/15/08 9:34 PM Page 199 FREDY PECCERELLI, A FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGIST, risks his personal security working for victims of political violence in his homeland. Peccerelli is founder and executive director of the Guatemalan Forensic Anthropology Founda- tion (Fundación de Antropología Forense de Guatemala or FAFG), a group that focuses on the recovery and identifica- tion of some of the 200 000 people, mostly indigenous Maya of the mountainous regions, that Guatemalan military forces killed or “disappeared” during the brutal civil war that occurred between the mid-1960s and the mid-1990s. Peccerelli was born in Guatemala. His family immigrated to the United States when his father, a lawyer, was threatened by death squads. He grew up in New York and attended Brooklyn College in the 1990s. But he felt a need to reconnect with his heritage and began to study anthropology as a vehicle that would allow him to serve his country. The FAFG scientists excavate clandestine mass graves, exhume the bodies, and identify them through several means, such as matching dental and/or medical records. Anthropologists In studying skeletons, they try to determine the person’s age, gender, stature, ancestry, and lifestyle. DNA studies at are few because of the expense. The scientists also collect Work information from relatives of the victims and from eye- witnesses of the massacres. Since 1992, the FAFG team has discovered and exhumed approximately 200 mass grave sites in villages, fields, and churches.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cross-Cultural Test of Nancy Jay's Theory About Women, Sacrificial
    Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 6 | Issue 1 Article 5 Nov-2004 A Cross-cultural Test of Nancy Jay’s Theory About Women, Sacrificial Blood and Religious Participation Virginia S. Fink Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws Part of the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Fink, Virginia S. (2004). A Cross-cultural Test of Nancy Jay’s Theory About Women, Sacrificial Blood and Religious Participation. Journal of International Women's Studies, 6(1), 54-72. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol6/iss1/5 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2004 Journal of International Women’s Studies. A Cross-cultural Test of Nancy Jay’s Theory About Women, Sacrificial Blood and Religious Participation Virginia S. Fink Ph.D.i Abstract I examine the theoretical insights of Nancy Jay’s 1992 investigation of patrilineal sacrificial rituals and their role in the restriction of women in religious rituals. I use the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample, a representative sample of preindustrial societies, to test the strength of patrilineality and other factors identified as subordinating women in preindustrial societies. A societal pattern of male inheritance of property and patrilineal descent are the strongest predictors of women being restricted or excluded from major public religious rituals.
    [Show full text]
  • Typology of Oromo Personal Names
    International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) ISSN 2307-4531 (Print & Online) http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Typology of Oromo Personal Names Tesfaye Gudeta Gerba School of Foreign Language Studies, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Haramaya University P.O.Box 251 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper addresses the typology of Oromo personal names and considers naming as an important aspect of the Oromo society. The present study looks at Oromo names within the idea of linguistics anthropology. It considers names are not arbitrary labels but sociocultural tags that have sociocultural functions and meanings. The data was collected from native speakers Afan Oromo languages. Qualitative research design, Ethnolinguistics research and an in-depth interview were employed. The data were analysed qualitatively. The analysis shows Oromo personal names have typology or semantic classification based on the how and when of naming a baby. The typology of Oromo names include circumstantial names, depict special physical appearance and Behavioral features at birth, names derived from animals, tempronyms, names associated with plants (flora names), names referring to agricultural work product and cattle amount, names referring to the Oromo days of a month, names reflecting joy and happiness, name denoting seasons, birthday names, seven days of a week, birth order names, names indicating birth Places, twin names, clan name, names referring to grandfather, grandmother, and great grandfather (ancestor’s names), names associated with trees, political related names, and teknonymy. Keywords: Oromo Naming Practices; Oromo Personal Names; Typology of Oromo personal names ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • R. Ellen Semantic Anarchy and Ordered Social Practice in Nuaulu Personal Naming
    R. Ellen Semantic anarchy and ordered social practice in Nuaulu personal naming In: Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 139 (1983), no: 1, Leiden, 18-45 This PDF-file was downloaded from http://www.kitlv-journals.nl Downloaded from Brill.com10/06/2021 01:49:17PM via free access R. F. ELLEN SEMANTIC ANARCHY AND ORDERED SOCIAL PRACTICE IN NUAULU PERSONAL NAMING1 An emerging characteristic of the social anthropology of the last decade has been a healthy scepticism about formal theoretical orthodoxies. Functionalism, structuralism and marxism have in turn been subjected to an accommodating révisionism, eclectic in its sources of inspiration, refreshingly honest in the face of intransigent data, and aware of the limitations of concepts. More specifically, in the analysis of indigenous categories, the supreme confidence of formal linguistic approaches, cognitive structuralism and the inheritors of l'Année Sociologique has been tempered by an extension of mutual respect, and through repeated convincing demonstrations that (while patterned) the relations between categories are always variable, often contradictory, sometimes conflicting, and ever subject to reinterpretation and appropriation for new social purposes. All this is not to deny that the conduct of good ethnography has always provided a counterpoint and corrective to received dogma, but it is the sheer mass of current writing in this vein (together with its self-consciousness) which suggests an historically novel condition. And it is the very momentum established by such a critique which has given rise to a potential danger. For the naive, the opportunist and the slavishly fashion-conscious the movement could easily be transformed into no more than a concern for methodical rigour and empirical detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering Clan in Tibet
    Are We Legend? Reconsidering Clan in Tibet Jonathan Samuels (University of Heidelberg) 1. Introduction ibetan Studies is relatively familiar with the theme of clan. The so-called “Tibetan ancestral clans” regularly feature in T works of Tibetan historiography, and have been the subject of several studies.1 Dynastic records and genealogies, often labelled “clan histories,” have been examined, and attempts have been made to identify ancient Tibetan clan territories.2 Various ethnographic and anthropological studies have also dealt both with the concept of clan membership amongst contemporary populations and a supposed Tibetan principle of descent, according to which the “bone”- substance (rus pa), the metonym for clan, is transmitted from father to progeny.3 Can it be said, however, that we have a coherent picture of clan in Tibet, particularly from a historical perspective? The present article has two aims. Firstly, by probing the current state of our understanding, it draws attention to key unanswered questions pertaining to clans and descent, and attempts to sharpen the discussion surrounding them. Secondly, exploring new avenues of research, it considers the extent to which we may distinguish between idealised representation and social reality within relevant sections of traditional hagiographical literature. 2. Current Understanding: Anthropological Studies and their Relevance Current understanding of Tibetan clans and descent rules has been 4 informed by several anthropological studies, including those of 1 Stein 1961; Karmay [1986] 1998; Vitali 2003. 2 Dotson 2012. 3 Oppitz 1973; Aziz 1974; Levine 1984. 4 The “current understanding” referred to here is that prevalent amongst members of the Tibetan Studies community; I address the way that evidence from Jonathan Samuels, “Are We Legend? Reconsidering Clan in Tibet,” Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypocoristics: a Derivational Problem
    Hypocoristics: A derivational Problem Mohammed Al-Qenae Master of Arts by Research University of York Language and Linguistic Science May 2018 Abstract This study is an investigatory research on the two major schools of linguistics, formal and functional. The study looks at earlier versions of Generative Theory as the representative of formal linguistics and contrasts it to Skousen’s computational model which is taken as the representative of functional linguistics. The way each of the theories are described and evaluated are by considering how each of them can be used in analysing hypocoristic data. A description of hypocoristics for 165 names collected from Kuwaiti Arabic speakers were the base for the analysis. The data was given a general description at first to show how they can be accounted for in the two theories. The first approach that was used was a rule-based approach used previously with Jordanian Arabic Hypocoristics which use Semitic root and Pattern Morphology. The second rule-based approach was also a rule- based approach the employed phonological processes to account for the derivation. The two were considered part of formal theories of analysis. The functional analysis which uses a computational model that employs phonological features defined over statistically driven frequencies was used to model the data. An evaluation of the model with low success rates lead to the change of the model and present an alternative hybrid model that utilises both rules and analogy. The model was inspired by a rule-based theory which was not fleshed out and analogy was used to flesh it out and place it with a usage-based theory of language.
    [Show full text]
  • 40- CHAPTER 3 KIN LINKS and LABELS but When They Enter Into
    -40- CHAPTER 3 KIN LINKS AND LABELS But when they enter into earnest, their Language is much more capable than our' s, of whatever denotes Respect and Distinction. Simon de la Loubère 1693: 54. Kinship in Hua Kok coincides fairly closely in its main features with those described in the ethnography of Central Thai society (Blanchard 1957; Kauf- man 1960; Lebar 1964; Riley 1972; Sharp et al. 1953; Soontornpasuch 1963). This literature is rather general in tone and so I propose to examine in greater detail those aspects most germane to the study of social organisa- tion. If one is to single out any special feature of Thai kinship it is that there is no single set of clearly stated and effectively sanctioned norms of conduct between kin. In almost all those spheres of life which may be placed within the rubric of kinship, the range of variation in the behaviour of individuals occupying specified kinship positions makes generalisation and even the per- ception of order problematical. Only by reference to particular situations and the responses to these can the system - the order and regularities - of what we call kinship be revealed. My method, therefore, is to elucidate the structural principles used by informants and then examine what happened in particular situations, an approach which is facilitated by the range of situa- tions being culturally limited. By examining the circumstances of a set of choices it is possible to specify important variables helping to determine par- ticipants' decisions. Thus the social and cultural milieu is to be conceived of as a set of defined restraints within which individuals make a series of unique decisions that, when compared with the decisions of others, are seen to be orderly, systematic and even predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Mediation of Exchange Structures: Ambilateral Sidedness and Property Flows in Pul Eliya (Sri Lanka) Michael Houseman, Douglas White
    Network Mediation of Exchange Structures: Ambilateral Sidedness and Property Flows in Pul Eliya (Sri Lanka) Michael Houseman, Douglas White To cite this version: Michael Houseman, Douglas White. Network Mediation of Exchange Structures: Ambilateral Sided- ness and Property Flows in Pul Eliya (Sri Lanka). R.R. White, T. Schweizer. Kinship, Networks and Exchange, Cambridge University Press, pp.58-88, 1998. halshs-00119442 HAL Id: halshs-00119442 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00119442 Submitted on 9 Dec 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 4 Network Mediation of Exchange Structures: Ambilateral Sidedness and Property Flows in Pul Eliya (Sri Lanka) Michael Houseman and Douglas R. White (Chapter 4, pp. 58-88 in Kinship, Networks and Exchange, edited by Thomas Schweizer and Douglas R. White) Our aim, by means of the richly documented example of Pul Eliya (Leach 1961 [1968]), is to examine the relationship between certain kinship phenomenon (pertaining to the circulation of persons) and certain aspects of economic exchange (pertaining to the circulation of things) from a network analysis perspective. In doing so, we hope to demonstrate the relevance of a particular approach to alliance relations -- one very much in keeping with Leach's work -- in which primary emphasis is given to actual marriage ties and structure is conceived above all as an emergent patterning of the marriage network as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • The Matrilineal Royal Succession in the Empire of Kush: a New Proposal Identifying the Kinship Terminology in the 25Th and Napatan Dynasties As That of Iroquois/Crow
    2015 Varia Kumiko Saito The matrilineal royal Succession in the Empire of Kush: A new proposal Identifying the Kinship Terminology in the 25th and napatan Dynasties as that of Iroquois/Crow Introduction1 Various theories about the patterns of royal succes- sion in the 25th and Napatan Dynasties have been proposed. Macadam proposed a fratrilineal successi- on in which kingship passed from brother to brother and then to the children of the eldest brother.2 Török integrated the patrilineal, matrilineal, and fratrilineal succession systems.3 Kahn and Gozzoli4 take the position that the succession pattern in the 25th and in which some royal women held both the titles of Napatan Dynasties was basically patrilineal. It is snt nswt “king’s sister” and sAt nswt “king’s daughter”, noteworthy that, in Macadam’s and Török’s theories and this ground is regarded as decisive. However, this as well as the patrilineal succession, it is supposed that ignores the fact that it has been suggested that sn(t) all kings were sons of kings. I doubted this father- in its extended meaning may mean “cousin,” “aunt,” son relationship when I started inquiring into the “uncle,” “nephew,” or “niece.”5 If so, a daughter of matrilineal tradition in Kush. the previous king who had the title snt nswt could One of the textual grounds for accepting the be a cousin of the reigning king. It is also possible father-son relationship of the kings is the indirect one that the Kushite kingdom was a matrilineal society using a kinship terminology that was different from 1 This article is a revised version of my paper originally that of Egypt.
    [Show full text]