Prayerbook Reform in the English-Speaking World John D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prayerbook Reform in the English-Speaking World John D \ _-. “.. a 610 Tradition and Modernity Prayerbook Reform in the English-Speaking World John D. Rayner Introduction In 1968 the World Union for Progressive Judaism published a book by my late friend and teacher Professor Jakob J. Petuchowskj (1925-1991), na‘ub 1mm, entitled Prayerbook Reform in Europe. My subject today is prayerbook reform in the English-s eaking world, with special reference to the second half of the twentieth century, in w ’ch my friend Rabbi Chaim Stem, TR” 11:, has played a re-emjnent role. When I say that, I refer both to 9 North American part of the story, which Petuchowski did not deal with because it lay outside his frame of reference, and to the British side of the story, which he covered only down to 1967 — a key year, as we shall see, in the story to be told. But before we come to that, there is a whole lot of background to be filled in. Importance of the Prayerbook. The traditional Jewish prayerbook is, next to the Bible, the most important work of Jewish literature in terms of its influence on Jewish life. The Bible is of course in a class by itself: unrivalled in spiritual and literary greatness, and also in the sense that practically all subsequent Jewish literature presupposes it and is to a large extent a commentary on it. But the Prayerbook bears comparison with it because it has been and still is more widely owned and more frequently used than any other Jewish book. Besides, much of the Bible is contained within it. The Psalms, for instance, are known to most Jews from the Prayerbook rather than from the Bible. If that applies to Judaism generally, it applies with special force to Progressive Judaism, by which term, as in the World Union for Progressive Judaism, I mean all sorts of Liberal and Reform Judaism. For there, in addition to all else, it is an expression of the distinctive which binds the _ ideology movement together. History of the Jewish Liturgy For our purpose the history of the Jewish liturgy may be divided into three phases. The first phase extended from the emergence of the Pharisees in the second century BCE until the compilation of the Mishnah around 200 CE. This was the formative phase in which the biblical selections were made and the so-cafled Stammgebete or ’basic prayers’ cb'mposed. ’biblical selections’ we mean the Shema, the Priestly Benediction, the Hallel, the other Psalms as appointed for various occasions, the weekl readings from the Pentateuch and the Prophets, and the Five Megillot as read on t e relevant feasts and fasts. By Stammgebete we mean the many hundreds of prayers in berakhah or ’benediction’ style, some long and some short, which consist of, or conclude with, a eulogy praising God, for example, as our Creator or our Benefactor or our Lawgiver or our Redeemer. The second phase extended from the period of the Talmud through the Middle Ages down to the dawn of modernity. This long period was one of elaboration and supplementation, particularly in the form of poetic compositions called piyyutim. But the rate of expansion of the liturgy gradually declined because the traditionalism which allowed only additions, never omissions, had the effect of making the services so long that it ultimately produced a sort of saturation point: there was no room for more. As a result, the traditional prayerbook has an ‘antique’ feel. For it contains little that is later than the Talmud and almost nothing later than the Middle Ages, and therefore shows virtually no awareness of the huge changes that have occurred in human knowledge, thought and feeling in recent centuries. That is perhaps the fundamental reason why, when the Emancipation opened for European Jewry the door to modernity, many of those who passed through that door found the old prayerbook no lon er spiritually satisfying. There were other, more superficial reasons: the length of t e services, the excessive amount of repetition, the exclusive use of Hebrew, the absence of instrumental music, the segregation of the sexes, the indecorum. But the deeper problem was one of theological content. Accordingly, the third phase in the history of the Jewish liturgy, in which we are still engaged, has been one of reconstruction. Even the Orthodox and the Conservatives found it necessary to tidy up the traditional liturgy to some extent, but of course it is chiefly the Reformers who may be said to have, in varying degree, reconstructed it. Conservative and Radical Tendencies The prayerbooks they have produced on both sides of the Atlantic — numbering by now about 250 - fall broadly into two categories, which we may call conservative (with a small ’c’) and radical. The more conservative a prayerbook is the more faithfully it will reproduce the traditional liturgy, the more reluctant it will be to deviate from its structures or tamper with its texts, and the more disinclined it will be supplement it with anything new. Conversely, the radical tendency is more selective in its use of the traditional liturgy, more prepared to take liberties with its structures, more willing to abridge or amend its texts, to supplement it with novel material, and to offer variety and choice. Of course there are many gradations within each of these tendencies, so that towards the centre they are not so easily distinguishable. Nevertheless the vast majority of the prayerbooks to be surveyed fall unmistakably into one category or the other. The distinction between them corresponds to, and derives from, a difference in perception as to the nature of Progressive Judaism. Is Progressive Judaism essentially a continuation of the Rabbinic Judaism of pre-Emancipation times? Then its liturgy, like its beliefs and practices, should remain substantially unchanged and require only relatively superficial, 'cosmetic’ adjustments. Or is Progressive Judaism a new kind of Judaism, as different from Rabbinic Judaism as that was from the Temple-based Judaism of biblical times which preceded it, because the Emancipation wrought a paradigm-shift as fundamental as the destruction of the Tem le in 70 CE? If so, it needs a new liturgy, appropriate to the post-Emancipation age, a1 ough in constructing such a liturgy it may of course make more or less abundant uSe of the traditional liturgical heritage. Controversial Issues It will be helpful at this stage to identify in advance some of the specific issues, so that we may be able to refer back to them more briefly later. Traditionally, the Shema consists of three biblical passages of which the first is about the Unity of God, the second about the rewards of obedience and the penalties of disobedience, and the third about thla commandment of the fringes. Is it de rigueur to retain all three or, having in mind the need to keep the services reasonably short, is it sufficient to recite the first? The traditional liturgy includes an additional service called Musuf, recited on sabbaths and festivals after the morning service in memory of the additional sacrifice that used to be offered on those occasions in Temple times. Is that a sufficient reason for canying on the tradition two thousand years later? ‘ The traditional liturgy maintains the ancient eschatology, which involves the ingathering of the exiles, the coming of the Messiah, the restoration of the Davidic monarchy, the rebuilding of the Temple, the resumption of the sacrificial cult, and the resurrection of the dead. For instance, the first benediction of the principal Jewish prayer, known as Amidah, expresses the belief that God will one day send us firm, ’a redeemer’, meaning the Messiah. Can we honestly say that? The second benediction declares that God mm“: mm, will revive the dead. Can we truthfully say that? The tenth benediction concludes with the assurance WWW ‘09 TH: ppm, that God will gather in the dispersed of His people Israel. Can we sincerely say that? The seventeenth benediction affirms 11‘s“: 1mm 1mm, that God will restore His Divine Presence to Zion, which is a poetic way of saying that the Temple will be rebuilt. Can we with integrity say that? The traditional liturgy is also particularistic. It prays bmcr my “31:1 Rah, that God will heal the sick of His people Israel, and 5150: 5mm» mrm: Tum, bless His people Israel with peace. It affirms 1W5‘52n mom, that God has exalted us above all tongues; mznnn “1:0 mm N'DID; that He has not made us like the nations of other lands, mum awn: now 351, nor placed us like other families of the earth. Can we say these things consistently with our belief that the God of Israel is the God of all humanity? T e traditional liturgy shows no awareness that we live in a post-Copernican, post- Newtonian, post—Napoleonic, post-Freudian world; a world of ecological awareness; of interfaith dialogue; of religious, ethnic and cultural pluralism; and one which has experienced the Holocaust and the establishment of the State of Israel. Is there not a need to acknowledge these facts liturgically? There is an abundance of inspirational passages in Jewish literature, biblical and post- biblical, which do not feature in the traditional liturgy. Likewise in Yiddish and Chasidic literature, and in modem Hebrew poetry, and indeed in non-Jewish spiritual literature as well. Is there not a case for drawing on these sources to enrich Jewish worship? From the standpoint of feminist theology the traditional Siddur is "flagrantly fiatriarchal and hierarchical in word, thought and tone” and its “overriding view is that umankind is subordinate to an all-powerful deity who bears incontestably masculine attributes” (Dr Eric L.
Recommended publications
  • LJS Newsthe NEWSLETTER of the LIBERAL JEWISH SYNAGOGUE
    March 2019 Adar I/Adar II 5779 THE NEWSLETTER OF THE LIBERAL JEWISH SYNAGOGUE LJS News New stained glass window in the Rabbi John Rayner Prayer Room Rabbi John Rayner z’’l was uppermost in our thoughts at the Shabbat service on 9 February. Inside this issue John and Jane Rayner’s grandson, Lev Taylor (pictured), who is studying to be a rabbi at Leo Rabbi Alexandra Wright on 2 Baeck College, gave the sermon to a packed Echoes of Contempt Sanctuary. He reflected with great affection on Shabbat Services and Festivals 3 John as a grandfather – and avid collector of jokes! Council Report 4 We left the Sanctuary for the dedication service for Forthcoming Events 5 the stained glass window panel created by Ruth Notes from the Rabbis’ Desks 6 Kersley and now in position in the John Rayner Ruth Kersley on the 7 Prayer Room. Rabbi Elana Dellal read from a Stained Glass Window Panel sermon by Rabbi Rayner reflecting on a rabbinic The Tu Bi’Sh’vat Shabbaton 8-9 saying about never praying in a room without The Learning Circle 10-12 a window. Rabbi Alexandra Wright’s dedication Bernie Bulkin’s new book: prayer included a passage about performing Solving Chemistry 13 mitzvot by creating beautiful ritual objects and Community Events 14 places of worship. Igor Zinkov, our student rabbi, Young LJS 15 then read a blessing before everyone marvelled Purim Celebrations at the LJS 16 at the new stained glass panel and enjoyed the The LJS Communal Seder 16 sumptuous Kiddush Jane Rayner provided for this special occasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Papers
    MS 316 1 A1077 Papers of Leo Baeck College Section A: Administrative papers General 84/4 Committee lists: lists of members of Leo Baeck College 1981-8 committees 78/2 Ten year plan: including a strategy document, a little 1992 correspondence and memos Administration Group 108/2 Administrative meetings: correspondence, papers for the 1980-95 Association of Jewish Communal Professionals (AJPC) conference 1993, and minutes of the administration group 108/4 Administration and personnel: includes job applications, 1987-95 correspondence and minutes Leo Baeck College Company: 1—Constitution, Articles of Association and lists of members 32/1 Constitution: includes Articles of Association for the College, and 1958-73 correspondence and other items about incorporation of the Leo Baeck College Ltd. 32/2 Constitution: [Litman] Constitutional Committee of the Council of 1969-73 Leo Baeck College. 32/3 Constitution: revisions 1976-80 46/4 Leo Baeck College corporate plan 1984-5 41/9 Leo Baeck College: draft of `Towards a Corporate Plan' 1984-5 231/13 Leo Baeck College Company: includes a copy of the Articles of 1985-7 Association, a list of the members of the company, and correspondence 70/2 Leo Baeck College Company: papers relating to the company, 1991-2 including lists of members, biographical details of those standing for council, and correspondence 109/1 Company membership and covenants forms 1991 106/3 Company members: includes lists of members and correspondence 1992-5 Leo Baeck College Company: 2—Company Registration 8/2 Register for Leo Baeck
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberal Jewish Synagogue the Learning Circle Classes in Jewish Studies and Hebrew 2017 - 2018 / 5778
    The Liberal Jewish Synagogue The Learning Circle Classes in Jewish Studies and Hebrew 2017 - 2018 / 5778 And do not say, sure, I will study. Perhaps you will never have leisure Avot 2:4) 1 Welcome to The Learning Circle At the centre of the life of our synagogue here at the LJS lies its educational programme: the LJS Nursery for children aged 2½ - 5 years old, Rimon Religion School from 3½ to 15, and a full programme of learning and engagement for adults. There is nothing more fulfilling and stimulating than reading a text, listening to a piece of music, looking at a painting, engaging in discussion or learning something new. This prospectus provides a gateway to lifelong learning about Judaism and Jewish cultural identity. For the beginner, Exploring Judaism provides a weekly exploration of Jewish life, history, belief and observance with time to reflect on living a Jewish life. Festivals offer times to delve more deeply into their significance and practice. Lunchtime gatherings on Shabbat have proved a popular way for the congregation to come together to listen to first-class speakers. Art, poetry and music feature in our programme as well as discussions about Israel and Jewish identity. We are delighted to be collaborating once again with Spiro Ark with a full programme of Hebrew and Yiddish classes. In addition, on offer for the first time is a programme of classes at Leo Baeck College. We hope that there will be something that will draw you over the threshold and help to deepen Jewish knowledge and wisdom and enhance our spirituality and Jewish identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Andre Ungar Z’L (21 July 1929–5 May 2020)
    Rabbi Andre Ungar z’l (21 July 1929–5 May 2020) Jonathan Magonet abbi Ungar was born in Budapest to Bela and Frederika Ungar. The Rfamily lived in hiding with false identity papers from 1944 under the German occupation.1 After the war, a scholarship brought him to the UK where he studied at Jews’ College, then part of University College, and subsequently studied philosophy. Feeling uncomfortable within Orthodoxy, he met with Rabbi Harold Reinhart and Rabbi Leo Baeck and eventually became an assistant rabbi at West London Synagogue. In 1954 he obtained his doctorate in philosophy and was ordained as a rabbi through a programme that preceded the formal creation of Leo Baeck College in 1956. In 1955 he was appointed as rabbi at the pro- gressive congregation in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Very soon his fiery anti-Apartheid sermons were condemned in the Afrikaans newspapers and received mixed reactions from the Jewish community. In December 1956 he was served with a deportation order and was forced to leave the country. He wrote with passion about his South African experience some ten years later in the book Resistance against Tyranny2 A symposium edited by his friend and fellow Hungarian Eugene Heimler whose important account of his Holocaust experience Night of the Mist Ungar had translated into English. I found that our own genteel white leisure and wealth was a thin veneer over a vast mass of coloured suffering; and that the distinction was arti- ficially created, maintained and, since the Nationalist victory of 1948, deliberately worsened day after day.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Payment Life Policy the MASSACHUSETTS
    II ADVERTISEMENTS A SAFE INVESTMENT FOR YOU Did you ever try to invest money safely? Experienced Financiers find this difficult: How much more so an inexperienced person. ...THE... Twenty Payment Life Policy (With its Combined Insurance and Endowment Features) ISSUED By THE MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, OF SPRINGFIELD, MASS. is recommended to you as an investment, safe and profitable. The Policy is plain and simple and the privileges and values are stnted in plain figures that any one can read. It is a sure and systematic way of saving money for your own use or support in later years. Saving is largely a matter of habit. And the semi-compulsory feature cultivates that saving habit. Undir the contracts issued by the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insur- ance Company the protection afforded is unsurpassed. For further information address HOME OFFICE, Springfield, Mass., or New York Office, Empire Building, 71 Broadway. PHILADELPHIA OFFICE, - - - Philadelphia Bourse. BALTIMORE " 4 South Street. CINCINNATI " - Johnston Building. CHICAGO " Merchants Loan and Trust Building. ST. LOUIS " .... Century Building. ADVERTISEMENTS III 1851, 1901. The Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company, of Hartford, Connecticut, Issues Endowment Policies to either men or women, which (besides.giving Five other options) GUARANTEE when the Insured is Fifty, Sixty, or Seventy Years Old To Pay $1,500 in Cash for Every $1,000 of Insurance in force. Sample Policies, rates, and other information will be given on application to the Home Office. ¥ ¥ ¥ JONATHAN B. BUNCE, President. JOHN M. HOLCOMBE, Vice-President. CHARLES H. LAWRENCE, Secretary. MANAGERS: WEED & KENNEDY, New York. JULES GIRARDIN, Chicago. H. W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Letters of Rabbi Samuel S. Cohon
    Baruch J. Cohon, ed.. Faithfully Yours: Selected Rabbinical Correspondence of Rabbi Samuel S. Cohon during the Years 1917-1957. Jersey City: KTAV Publishing House, 2008. xvii + 407 pp. $29.50, cloth, ISBN 978-1-60280-019-9. Reviewed by Dana Evan Kaplan Published on H-Judaic (June, 2009) Commissioned by Jason Kalman (Hebrew Union College - Jewish Institute of Religion) Samuel S. Cohon is a largely forgotten fgure. became popular, was deeply interested in Jewish The results of googling his name are quite limited. mysticism. Cohon helped guide the Reform move‐ Michael A. Meyer discusses him in his Response to ment through difficult terrain at a critical time in Modernity and a select number of other writers American Jewish history. Cohon is best known for have analyzed specific aspects of his intellectual his drafting of “The Columbus Platform: The Guid‐ contribution to American Reform Judaism, but ing Principles for Reform Judaism,” which is seen there has been relatively little written about Co‐ as having reversed the anti-Zionism of the “Pitts‐ hon.[1] The American Jewish Archives in Cincin‐ burgh Platform” of 1885. He is also of historical nati, Ohio, has an extensive collection of his pa‐ importance because of the role that he played in pers, and booksellers still stock a number of his critiquing the Union Prayer Book (UPB), which books, but most American Jews have no idea who was the prayer book in virtually every Reform he was. Even those with a serious interest in temple from the end of the nineteenth century American Jewish history or Reform Judaism are until the publication of The Gates of Prayer: The unlikely to know very much about him.
    [Show full text]
  • Reform Judaism: in 1000 Words Gender
    Reform Judaism: In 1000 Words Gender Context One of the distinctive features of Reform Judaism is our unequivocal commitment to gender equality. Or is it? As Rabbi Barbara Borts of Darlington Hebrew Congregation writes, though there are many examples of equality in our movement (such as our exceptional siddur and women in senior rabbinic positions) the journey towards true equality in our communities has been a process of development over many years, and in some ways is not yet complete. Content The male rabbi who was approached to write this section demurred, believing it was inappropriate for him to write about gender issues. Gender, he believed, really meant ‘women.’ This is a natural conclusion. After all, Judaism developed as a patriarchal religion with strict delineations between male Jewish life and female Jewish life: male Judaism was the norm [a Jew and His Judaism] and the woman, a separate category.i Although the idea of gender now encompasses many aspects of sexual identity, for most people, ‘gender’ will mean ‘women’ and we will thus examine past and current thinking about women’s roles in the MRJ. In 1840 West London Synagogue, women’s equality was not part of the founders’ visions. Women sat in the balcony until 1910 (except for the Yamim Nora’im) and the choir was initially all-male, although women would join early on.ii Other founding synagogues discussed participation by women, but there was no consensus about what equality for women entailed, not even through the 1990s and perhaps beyond. The first women rabbis often encountered great opposition and found it difficult to gain employment against male candidates for particular jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Benscher (C
    MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF LIBERAL JUDAISM (ULPS) – KNOWN AS COUNCIL HELD ON TUESDAY 1st May 2018 AT THE LIBERAL JEWISH SYNAGOGUE SUBJECT TO SECTIONS 26 -32 OF THE MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF LIBERAL JUDAISM (ULPS) PRESENT PRESIDENT / Jeromé Freedman, Louise Freedman, Rabbi Harry Jacobi VICE PRESIDENTS OFFICERS Simon Benscher (Chair), Graham Carpenter, Amanda McFeeters, (DIRECTORS) Jackie Richards, Ruth Seager, AmeLia Viney, Karen Newman, Ros CLayton RABBIS Richard Jacobi, CharLes MiddLeburgh, CharLey Baginsky, Pete Tobias COUNCIL Frank MaxweLL (Birmingham), WiLLiam GLassman (EaLing), Sam Eastmond (EaLing), Ruth SeLo (Eastbourne), Bob KamaLL (ELELS), Richard Stevens (ELELS), Josie Kinchin (FinchLey), ALison Turner (Herefordshire), Peter LobLe (LJS), ALan SoLomon (Mosaic), Jane GreenfieLd (Southgate), Stuart MacDonaLd IN Davina Bennett (Operations Manager, ELstree), Becca Fetterman, ATTENDANCE ELLie Lawson, Simon Lovick, SheLLey ShocoLinsky-Dwyer, ALexandra Simonon, Hannah Stephenson, Rafe Thurstance (minutes). OPENING PRAYER Rabbi CharLey Baginsky WELCOME AND APOLOGIES SB weLcomes everyone to the LJS, thanks the LJS for their hospitaLity. Attendees are notified that the meeting wiLL be recorded for the sake of the minutes, and asks peopLe to state any objections - none are recorded. Those in attendance are asked to state who they are before speaking. Sam Eastmond (EaLing), Davina Bennett (ELstree), ELLie Lawson (LJY-Netzer), Ruth SeLo (Eastbourne) are weLcomed to their first meeting. Apologies were received for Aaron GoLdstein, Andrew GoLdstein, Sharon GoLdstein, Nick SiLk, Peter Gordon, ALice ALphandary, Robin Moss, Lucian J. Hudson, Janet Berkman, Graham Berkman, Jennifer Lennard, Tamara Joseph, Cathy Burnstone, Ed Herman, Corinne Oppenheimer, Robin Samson, Lea MuehLstein, Joan Shopper, Nick BeLkin, and Rosie Ward. MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 2017 AND MATTERS ARISING The minutes were signed as an accurate record.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCING SIDDUR LEV CHADASH Charles H Middleburgh on Behalf of John D Rayner
    33¢, INTRODUCING SIDDUR LEV CHADASH Charles H Middleburgh on behalf of John D Rayner On this momentous day in our movement’s history I stand here to perform a function that all of us would have liked John Rayner to have been able to carry out. John is recovering well from his heart surgery and we send him our sincere good wishes for a refitah sh ’lemah, a speedy return to full health and vigour. In his unavoidable absence, and based almost totally on the text he would have delivered to you all, it therefore gives me great pleasure(although the phrase has rarely seemed less adequate) to present to this conference, and to the Union of Liberal and Progressive Synagogues, the long-awaited Siddur Lev Chadash. I do so on behalf of the Editorial Committee and all who have been involved in the compilation and production of the book. It has been said that objectivity is a fine quality that each of us should develop, and I dare say that there are many who would approach the presentation of Siddur Lev Chadash with far greater objectivity than do I; my excuse then for being here, in spite of my irrcdeemably subjective approach to my present task is that I do, at least, have the advantage of - knowing the new book rather well just as a parent knows its child; r‘ if. except, of course, that this particular child is biologically unusual in that its gestation has taken several years, and that it has a plurality of COLLEG mothers and fathers, otherwise known as the Editorial Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reflection and Celebration of the Life and Work of Rabbi John D
    AN INTRODUCTION TO ‘A REFLECTION AND CELEBRATION OF THE LIFE AND WORK OF RABBI JOHN D. RAYNER’ Alexandra Wright* Rabbi John Rayner was born in Berlin on 30 May 1924. He died in London on 19 September 2005, having made a significant contribution to the cause of Liberal Judaism in Great Britain. As Senior Rabbi of the Liberal Jewish Synagogue (LJS) for nearly thirty years, and Emeritus for nearly sixteen years until his death, his influence on the congregation which he served was immeasurable. He was the leading exponent of Liberal Judaism in Great Britain, seeking throughout his life to strengthen and reconstruct the Liberal Jewish movement in Britain that had been founded by Claude Montefiore and Lily Montagu and led by Rabbi Israel Mattuck, the LJS’s first rabbi. He was born Hans Sigismund Rahmer, the younger child of Ferdinand and Charlotte Rahmer, and was fifteen when he said goodbye to his parents and boarded what was to be one of the last of the Kindertransport trains to England. He lived, at first, with Will and Muriel Stannard and their sons, and then with Hugh and Elizabeth Wilkinson, both men ordained Christian clergy. In his memoir Before I Forget, published for his family and friends in 1999, he wrote: ‘From them I learnt much about religion at its best, but was never persuaded by Christian doctrine, and remained loyal to Judaism inwardly and, when opportunity occurred, outwardly’ (Rayner 1999: 36). In witnessing a liberal kind of Christianity, particularly at Durham School where he was a pupil, he ‘wished that there was a liberal version of Judaism that had all the virtues of liberal Christianity without the Christianity’ (Ibid.: 37).
    [Show full text]
  • Archives of the West London Synagogue
    1 MS 140 A2049 Archives of the West London Synagogue 1 Correspondence 1/1 Bella Josephine Barnett Memorial Prize Fund 1959-60 1/2 Blackwell Reform Jewish Congregation 1961-67 1/3 Blessings: correspondence about blessings in the synagogue 1956-60 1/4 Bradford Synagogue 1954-64 1/5 Calendar 1957-61 1/6 Cardiff Synagogue 1955-65 1/7 Choirmaster 1967-8 1/8 Choral society 1958 1/9 Confirmations 1956-60 1/10 Edgeware Reform Synagogue 1953-62 1/11 Edgeware Reform Synagogue 1959-64 1/12 Egerton bequest 1964-5 1/13 Exeter Hebrew Congregation 1958-66 1/14 Flower boxes 1958 1/15 Leo Baeck College Appeal Fund 1968-70 1/16 Leeds Sinai Synagogue 1955-68 1/17 Legal action 1956-8 1/18 Michael Leigh 1958-64 1/19 Lessons, includes reports on classes and holiday lessons 1961-70 1/20 Joint social 1963 1/21 Junior youth group—sports 1967 MS 140 2 A2049 2 Resignations 2/1 Resignations of membership 1959 2/2 Resignations of membership 1960 2/3 Resignations of membership 1961 2/4 Resignations of membership 1962 2/5 Resignations of membership 1963 2/6 Resignations of membership 1964 2/7 Resignations of membership Nov 1979- Dec1980 2/8 Resignations of membership Jan-Apr 1981 2/9 Resignations of membership Jan-May 1983 2/10 Resignations of membership Jun-Dec 1983 2/11 Synagogue laws 20 and 21 1982-3 3 Berkeley group magazines 3/1 Berkeley bulletin 1961, 1964 3/2 Berkeley bulletin 1965 3/3 Berkeley bulletin 1966-7 3/4 Berkeley bulletin 1968 3/5 Berkeley bulletin Jan-Aug 1969 3/6 Berkeley bulletin Sep-Dec 1969 3/7 Berkeley bulletin Jan-Jun 1970 3/8 Berkeley bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Judaism and Historical Consciousness Wiese-Vrw CS2.Indd Lxxii 1-2-2007 14:24:55 Modern Judaism and Historical Consciousness
    Modern Judaism and Historical Consciousness wiese-vrw_CS2.indd lxxii 1-2-2007 14:24:55 Modern Judaism and Historical Consciousness Identities, Encounters, Perspectives Edited by Andreas Gotzmann and Christian Wiese LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Modern Judaism and historical consciousness : identities, encounters, perspectives / edited by Andreas Gotzmann and Christian Wiese. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-90-04-15289-2 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 90-04-15289-X (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Jews—Historiography. 2. Judaism—Historiography. 3. Jewish learning and scholarship. 4. Rabbinical literatu- re—History and criticism. 5. Reform Judaism. 6. Antisemitism—History. 7. Jewish literature—History and criticism. 8. Jews—Emancipation. 9. Holocaust, Jewish (1939- 1945)—Historiography. 10. Zionism—Historiography. 11. Orthodox Judaism. 12. Jewish women—Historiography. I. Gotzmann, Andreas. II. Wiese, Christian, 1961- III. Title. DS115.5.M64 2006 909’.04924—dc22 2006037244 ISBN-13: 978 90 04 15289 2 © Copyright 2007 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill Academic Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo- copying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910 Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]