Probing the Evolution, Ecology and Physiology of Marine Protists Using Transcriptomics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Probing the Evolution, Ecology and Physiology of Marine Protists Using Transcriptomics REVIEWS Probing the evolution, ecology and physiology of marine protists using transcriptomics David A. Caron1, Harriet Alexander2, Andrew E. Allen3,4, John M. Archibald5,6, E. Virginia Armbrust7, Charles Bachy8, Callum J. Bell9, Arvind Bharti10, Sonya T. Dyhrman11, Stephanie M. Guida9, Karla B. Heidelberg1, Jonathan Z. Kaye12, Julia Metzner12, Sarah R. Smith4 and Alexandra Z. Worden6,8 Abstract | Protists, which are single-celled eukaryotes, critically influence the ecology and chemistry of marine ecosystems, but genome-based studies of these organisms have lagged behind those of other microorganisms. However, recent transcriptomic studies of cultured species, complemented by meta-omics analyses of natural communities, have increased the amount of genetic information available for poorly represented branches on the tree of eukaryotic life. This information is providing insights into the adaptations and interactions between protists and other microorganisms and macroorganisms, but many of the genes sequenced show no similarity to sequences currently available in public databases. A better understanding of these newly discovered genes will lead to a deeper appreciation of the functional diversity and metabolic processes in the ocean. In this Review, we summarize recent developments in our understanding of the ecology, physiology and evolution of protists, derived from transcriptomic studies of cultured strains and natural communities, and discuss how these novel large-scale genetic datasets will be used in the future. Phototrophy Marine protists are a phylogenetically broad group of chloroplasts but also consume prey. Protists typically A nutritional mode that eukaryotic organisms that are capable of existence as reproduce through mitotic division rather than through involves the use of light for the single cells, although many form colonies that exhibit sexual reproduction, which enables populations to double production of organic carbon coordinated behaviour. The term protist is largely histor- in a few hours to a few days. Their rapid growth rates ena- and the acquisition of energy. ical in nature, at one time referring to a kingdom-level ble them to contribute to important ecosystem functions: 1 Phytoplankton distinction in Whittaker’s tree of life , but still commonly protists have roles in primary production, as partners in Planktonic protists that use applied to all eukaryotes that are not plants, multi cellular various symbiotic relation ships and, at multiple trophic phototrophy as their nutritional animals or fungi. Most protists are microscopic, but levels, as links between the small animals that prey on mode. The term has ecological collectively these species span more than five orders of them and the vast numbers of bacteria, archaea, protists importance but little (FIG. 1) phylogenetic importance magnitude in size, display a myriad of morphologies, and even some metazoa that they consume . These because the behaviour occurs behaviours and nutritional modes, and have pivotal eco- links in the food web are essential for the biogeochemi- across many lineages of logical roles in marine ecosystems2,3. Protistan species cal cycles of the ocean, including the transport of carbon protists. are the most abundant eukaryotes in marine pelagic to the deep ocean. communities and constitute a substantial portion of the Despite the fundamental roles of protists in marine total biomass in the plankton. ecosystems, genome-based studies of these species Correspondence to D.A.C. Nutritional modes of protists range from pure have lagged behind those of other marine organ- Department of Biological photo trophy among many phytoplankton to the pure isms. However, in the past few decades, a lot of DNA Sciences, University of hetero trophy of species traditionally called protozoa. sequence information has become available for proti- Southern California, Protozoa generally derive their nutrition from the inges- stan marker genes4, transcriptomes5, genomes (almost 3616 Trousdale Parkway, 6 metatranscriptomes5 Los Angeles, California tion of bacteria, archaea or other eukaryotes, but some 20 complete genomes in total) , and 7 90089, USA. are parasites (or more accurately, parasitoids) of other even metagenomes . Analyses of these data have altered [email protected] protists and metazoa. In addition, many protists com- our understanding of protistan diversity, phylogeny, doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.160 bine photo trophy and heterotrophy in a single species evolution and physiology, and enriched our knowledge Published online 21 Nov 2016 (mixotrophy), such as phytoflagellates that have of various ecological interactions. 6 | JANUARY 2017 | VOLUME 15 www.nature.com/nrmicro ©2016 Mac millan Publishers Li mited, part of Spri nger Nature. All ri ghts reserved. ©2016 Mac millan Publishers Li mited, part of Spri nger Nature. All ri ghts reserved. REVIEWS Author addresses A few large culture-based and field-based projects have begun to address this disparity. The Marine 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, 3616 Trousdale Parkway, Microbial Eukaryote Transcriptome Sequencing Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. 2Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, Project (MMETSP) released nearly 680 transcriptome 1 Shields Avenue, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA. assemblies of pure cultures of protists in 2014, repre- 3Microbial and Environmental Genomics, J. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, senting isolates from much of the world’s oceans and a San Diego, California 92037, USA. few freshwater ecosystems (BOX 1). The MMETSP was 4Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Integrative Oceanography Division, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, California 92093, USA. conceived to facilitate comparative transcriptomics of 5Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Sir Charles Tupper environmentally important microbial eukaryotes. The Medical Building, 5850 College Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada. dataset increased ~50-fold the amount of information 6Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, 180 Dundas Street W, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8, available on gene expression from free-living protists, Canada. and doubled the number of protistan lineages for which 7School of Oceanography, University of Washington, 1503 NE Boat Street, Seattle, 5 Washington 98195, USA. genomic studies have been conducted . Subsequent 17 8Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 7700 Sandholdt Road, Moss Landing, work has continued to improve the gene assemblies . California 95039, USA. Concomitantly, two field programmes (the Tara Oceans 9National Center for Genome Resources, 2935 Rodeo Park Drive East, Santa Fe, and Malaspina expeditions)4,18 have circumnavigated the New Mexico 87505, USA. 10Syngenta Biotechnology, 629 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA. planet collecting samples to provide an enormous sam- 11Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, ple set for the investigation of the abundances, morph- Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, New York 10964, USA. ologies, genetic diversity and ecological significance of 12Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, 1661 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304, USA. marine protists. These studies highlight the importance of marine protists, demonstrate the genetic and physio- The historical partitioning of eukaryotes into king- logical potentials that underpin their activities and doms based on morphological characteristics, multi- provide new insights into the evolution of these species. cellularity or trophic mode1 has been challenged and Heterotrophy changed in recent years by information on genetic Insights into protistan phylogeny and evolution A nutritional mode that relatedness. The resulting framework for a molecular Modern protistan phylogeny. Our view of the evolution- involves the use of preformed organic matter for the taxonomy for protists has raised questions regarding ary relationships among protistan lineages has changed acquisition of carbon and the biogeography of these taxa and the adequacy of the substantially during the past few decades (FIG. 2). The energy. classical morphological species concept for protists8–10. Whittaker system1, which prevailed for two decades, Direct sequencing of rRNA genes from environmental grouped organisms into five kingdoms: Monera, Protista, Protozoa samples has revealed a huge protistan diversity, includ- Plantae, Fungi and Animalia. Eukaryotes that can exist as Protists that are not 11,12 photosynthetic, but are instead ing new lineages , and has stimulated hypotheses single cells were contained within the kingdom Protista. dependent on the ingestion of regarding the protistan rare biosphere — diverse taxa Protists were further organized according to morphology preformed organic matter present at low relative abundances in virtually all nat- and nutritional preferences, a scheme that was practical (usually prey) for their ural ecosystems — which may play important parts in for biologists of the time but artificially separated some nutrition. This older term is still in use; ‘heterotrophic protists’ the evolution of eukaryotes as well as in the stability closely related taxa that have different nutritional behav- 13–15 is used synonymously. and functional resilience of microbial communities . iours (for example, photosynthetic
Recommended publications
  • 1 Lessons from Simple Marine Models on the Bacterial Regulation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/211797; this version posted October 31, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Lessons from simple marine models on the bacterial regulation of eukaryotic development Arielle Woznicaa and Nicole Kinga,1 a Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States 1 Corresponding author, [email protected]. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/211797; this version posted October 31, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Highlights 2 - Cues from environmental bacteria influence the development of many marine 3 eukaryotes 4 5 - The molecular cues produced by environmental bacteria are structurally diverse 6 7 - Eukaryotes can respond to many different environmental bacteria 8 9 - Some environmental bacteria act as “information hubs” for diverse eukaryotes 10 11 - Experimentally tractable systems, like the choanoflagellate S. rosetta, promise to 12 reveal molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions 13 14 Abstract 15 Molecular cues from environmental bacteria influence important developmental 16 decisions in diverse marine eukaryotes. Yet, relatively little is understood about the 17 mechanisms underlying these interactions, in part because marine ecosystems are 18 dynamic and complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptophyte Farming by Symbiotic Ciliate Host Detected in Situ
    Cryptophyte farming by symbiotic ciliate host detected in situ Dajun Qiua, Liangmin Huanga, and Senjie Linb,1 aChinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China; and bDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340 Edited by David M. Karl, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, and approved September 8, 2016 (received for review July 28, 2016) Protist–alga symbiosis is widespread in the ocean, but its character- as the causative species of the bloom, with no detectable crypto- istics and function in situ remain largely unexplored. Here we report phytes and hardly any other organisms present in the bloom water − the symbiosis of the ciliate Mesodinium rubrum with cryptophyte (Fig. 1B). At 1.03 × 106 cells L 1, M. rubrum abundance in the bloom cells during a red-tide bloom in Long Island Sound. In contrast to was over 100-fold higher than the annual peak in Long Island Sound the current notion that Mesodinium retains cryptophyte chloroplasts (15). Each Mesodinium cell harbored 20 to 30 cryptophyte cells (n = or organelles, our multiapproach analyses reveal that in this bloom 16), which packed the peripheral region of the M. rubrum cells (Fig. the endosymbiotic Teleaulax amphioxeia cells were intact and 1E), with complete cell structures, including cell membranes, nuclei, expressing genes of membrane transporters, nucleus-to-cytoplasm and chloroplasts (Fig. 1C). Taking advantage of the large cell size of RNA transporters, and all major metabolic pathways. Among the Mesodinium spp. (width, 20 to 23 μm; length, 25 to 26 μm), we most highly expressed were ammonium transporters in both organ- picked M.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY AND PLANT BIOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Boris Wawrik, Chair ______________________________ Dr. J. Phil Gibson ______________________________ Dr. Anne K. Dunn ______________________________ Dr. John Paul Masly ______________________________ Dr. K. David Hambright ii © Copyright by JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER 2017 All Rights Reserved. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my two advisors Dr. Boris Wawrik and Dr. J. Phil Gibson for helping me become a better scientist and better educator. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Anne K. Dunn, Dr. K. David Hambright, and Dr. J.P. Masly for providing valuable inputs that lead me to carefully consider my research questions. I would also like to thank Dr. J.P. Masly for the opportunity to coauthor a book chapter on the speciation of diatoms. It is still such a privilege that you believed in me and my crazy diatom ideas to form a concise chapter in addition to learn your style of writing has been a benefit to my professional development. I’m also thankful for my first undergraduate research mentor, Dr. Miriam Steinitz-Kannan, now retired from Northern Kentucky University, who was the first to show the amazing wonders of pond scum. Who knew that studying diatoms and algae as an undergraduate would lead me all the way to a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Feeding on Microalgae Assessed with Molecular Trophic Markers
    Molecular Ecology (2013) doi: 10.1111/mec.12486 Coral feeding on microalgae assessed with molecular trophic markers MIGUEL C. LEAL,*† CHRISTINE FERRIER-PAGES,‡ RICARDO CALADO,* MEGAN E. THOMPSON,† MARC E. FRISCHER† and JENS C. NEJSTGAARD† *Departamento de Biologia & CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitario de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal, †Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, 10 Ocean Science Circle, 31411 Savannah, GA, USA, ‡Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Avenue St-Martin, 98000 Monaco, Monaco Abstract Herbivory in corals, especially for symbiotic species, remains controversial. To investi- gate the capacity of scleractinian and soft corals to capture microalgae, we conducted controlled laboratory experiments offering five algal species: the cryptophyte Rhodo- monas marina, the haptophytes Isochrysis galbana and Phaeocystis globosa, and the diatoms Conticribra weissflogii and Thalassiosira pseudonana. Coral species included the symbiotic soft corals Heteroxenia fuscescens and Sinularia flexibilis, the asymbiotic scleractinian coral Tubastrea coccinea, and the symbiotic scleractinian corals Stylophora pistillata, Pavona cactus and Oculina arbuscula. Herbivory was assessed by end-point PCR amplification of algae-specific 18S rRNA gene fragments purified from coral tissue genomic DNA extracts. The ability to capture microalgae varied with coral and algal species and could not be explained by prey size or taxonomy. Herbivory was not detected in S. flexibilis and S. pistillata. P. globosa was the only algal prey that was never captured by any coral. Although predation defence mechanisms have been shown for Phaeocystis spp. against many potential predators, this study is the first to suggest this for corals. This study provides new insights into herbivory in symbiotic corals and suggests that corals may be selective herbivorous feeders.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Cues Regulate Multicellular Development and Mating in the Choanoflagellate, S
    Bacterial cues regulate multicellular development and mating in the choanoflagellate, S. rosetta By Arielle Woznica A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Molecular and Cell Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nicole King, Chair Professor Russell Vance Professor Diana Bautista Professor Brian Staskawicz Spring 2017 Abstract Bacterial cues regulate multicellular development and mating in the choanoflagellate, S. rosetta By Arielle Woznica Doctor of Philosophy in Molecular and Cell Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Nicole King, Chair Animals first diverged from their unicellular ancestors in oceans dominated by bacteria, and have lived in close association with bacteria ever since. Interactions with bacteria critically shape diverse aspects of animal biology today, including developmental processes that were long thought to be autonomous. Yet, the multicellularity of animals and the often-complex communities of bacteria with which they are associated make it challenging to characterize the mechanisms underlying many bacterial-animal interactions. Thus, developing experimentally tractable host-microbe model systems will be essential for revealing the molecules and mechanisms by which bacteria influence animal development. The choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta, one of the closest living relatives of animals, has emerged as an attractive model for studying host-microbe interactions. Like all choanoflagellates, S. rosetta feeds on bacteria; however, we have found that interactions between S. rosetta and bacteria extend beyond those of predator and prey. In fact, two key transitions in the life history of S. rosetta, multicellular “rosette” development and sexual reproduction, are regulated by environmental bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Metagenomic Characterization of Unicellular Eukaryotes in the Urban Thessaloniki Bay
    Metagenomic characterization of unicellular eukaryotes in the urban Thessaloniki Bay George Tsipas SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS, BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION & LEGAL STUDIES A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science (MSc) in Bioeconomy Law, Regulation and Management May, 2019 Thessaloniki – Greece George Tsipas ’’Metagenomic characterization of unicellular eukaryotes in the urban Thessaloniki Bay’’ Student Name: George Tsipas SID: 268186037282 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Savvas Genitsaris I hereby declare that the work submitted is mine and that where I have made use of another’s work, I have attributed the source(s) according to the Regulations set in the Student’s Handbook. May, 2019 Thessaloniki - Greece Page 2 of 63 George Tsipas ’’Metagenomic characterization of unicellular eukaryotes in the urban Thessaloniki Bay’’ 1. Abstract The present research investigates through metagenomics sequencing the unicellular protistan communities in Thermaikos Gulf. This research analyzes the diversity, composition and abundance in this marine environment. Water samples were collected monthly from April 2017 to February 2018 in the port of Thessaloniki (Harbor site, 40o 37’ 55 N, 22o 56’ 09 E). The extraction of DNA was completed as well as the sequencing was performed, before the downstream read processing and the taxonomic classification that was assigned using PR2 database. A total of 1248 Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) were detected but only 700 unicellular eukaryotes were analyzed, excluding unclassified OTUs, Metazoa and Streptophyta. In this research-based study the most abundant and diverse taxonomic groups were Dinoflagellata and Protalveolata. Specifically, the most abundant groups of all samples are Dinoflagellata with 190 OTUs (27.70%), Protalveolata with 139 OTUs (20.26%) Ochrophyta with 73 OTUs (10.64%), Cercozoa with 67 OTUs (9.77%) and Ciliophora with 64 OTUs (9.33%).
    [Show full text]
  • PROTISTS Shore and the Waves Are Large, Often the Largest of a Storm Event, and with a Long Period
    (seas), and these waves can mobilize boulders. During this phase of the storm the rapid changes in current direction caused by these large, short-period waves generate high accelerative forces, and it is these forces that ultimately can move even large boulders. Traditionally, most rocky-intertidal ecological stud- ies have been conducted on rocky platforms where the substrate is composed of stable basement rock. Projec- tiles tend to be uncommon in these types of habitats, and damage from projectiles is usually light. Perhaps for this reason the role of projectiles in intertidal ecology has received little attention. Boulder-fi eld intertidal zones are as common as, if not more common than, rock plat- forms. In boulder fi elds, projectiles are abundant, and the evidence of damage due to projectiles is obvious. Here projectiles may be one of the most important defi ning physical forces in the habitat. SEE ALSO THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES Geology, Coastal / Habitat Alteration / Hydrodynamic Forces / Wave Exposure FURTHER READING Carstens. T. 1968. Wave forces on boundaries and submerged bodies. Sarsia FIGURE 6 The intertidal zone on the north side of Cape Blanco, 34: 37–60. Oregon. The large, smooth boulders are made of serpentine, while Dayton, P. K. 1971. Competition, disturbance, and community organi- the surrounding rock from which the intertidal platform is formed zation: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky is sandstone. The smooth boulders are from a source outside the intertidal community. Ecological Monographs 45: 137–159. intertidal zone and were carried into the intertidal zone by waves. Levin, S. A., and R.
    [Show full text]
  • Mixotrophic Protists Among Marine Ciliates and Dinoflagellates: Distribution, Physiology and Ecology
    FACULTY OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN PhD thesis Woraporn Tarangkoon Mixotrophic Protists among Marine Ciliates and Dinoflagellates: Distribution, Physiology and Ecology Academic advisor: Associate Professor Per Juel Hansen Submitted: 29/04/10 Contents List of publications 3 Preface 4 Summary 6 Sammenfating (Danish summary) 8 สรุป (Thai summary) 10 The sections and objectives of the thesis 12 Introduction 14 1) Mixotrophy among marine planktonic protists 14 1.1) The role of light, food concentration and nutrients for 17 the growth of marine mixotrophic planktonic protists 1.2) Importance of marine mixotrophic protists in the 20 planktonic food web 2) Marine symbiont-bearing dinoflagellates 24 2.1) Occurrence of symbionts in the order Dinophysiales 24 2.2) The spatial distribution of symbiont-bearing dinoflagellates in 27 marine waters 2.3) The role of symbionts and phagotrophy in dinoflagellates with symbionts 28 3) Symbiosis and mixotrophy in the marine ciliate genus Mesodinium 30 3.1) Occurrence of symbiosis in Mesodinium spp. 30 3.2) The distribution of marine Mesodinium spp. 30 3.3) The role of symbionts and phagotrophy in marine Mesodinium rubrum 33 and Mesodinium pulex Conclusion and future perspectives 36 References 38 Paper I Paper II Paper III Appendix-Paper IV Appendix-I Lists of publications The thesis consists of the following papers, referred to in the synthesis by their roman numerals. Co-author statements are attached to the thesis (Appendix-I). Paper I Tarangkoon W, Hansen G Hansen PJ (2010) Spatial distribution of symbiont-bearing dinoflagellates in the Indian Ocean in relation to oceanographic regimes. Aquat Microb Ecol 58:197-213.
    [Show full text]
  • Microalgae Strain Catalogue
    Microalgae strain catalogue A strain selection guide for microalgae users: cultivation and chemical characteristics for high added-value products CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 4 2. Strain catalogue ......................................................................................... 5 Anabaena cylindrica ........................................................................................... 6 Arthrospira platensis .......................................................................................... 8 Botryococcus braunii ........................................................................................ 10 Chlorella luteoviridis ......................................................................................... 12 Chlorella sorokiniana ........................................................................................ 14 Chlorella vulgaris .............................................................................................. 16 Dunaliella salina ............................................................................................... 18 Dunaliella tertiolecta ......................................................................................... 20 Haematococcus pluvialis .................................................................................. 22 Microcystis aeruginosa ..................................................................................... 24 Nannochloropsis occulata ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Pathogens of Harmful Microalgae
    21 Pathogens of Harmful Microalgae RS. Salomon and I. Imai 2L1 Introduction Pathogens are any organisms that cause disease to other living organisms. Parasitism is an interspecific interaction where one species (the parasite) spends the whole or part of its life on or inside cells and tissues of another living organism (the host), from where it derives most of its food. Parasites that cause disease to their hosts are, by definition, pathogens. Although infection of metazoans by other metazoans and protists are the more fre quently studied, there are interactions where both host and parasite are sin gle-celled organisms. Here we describe such interactions involving microal gae as hosts. The aim of this chapter is to review the current status of research on pathogens of harmful microalgae and present future perspec tives within the field. Pathogens with the ability to impair and kill micro algae include viruses, bacteria, fungi and a number of protists (see reviews by Elbrachter and Schnepf 1998; Brussaard 2004; Park et al. 2004; Mayali and Azam 2004; Ibelings et al. 2004). Valuable information exists from non-harm ful microalgal hosts, and these studies will be referred to throughout the text. Nevertheless, emphasis is given to cases where hosts are recognizable harmful microalgae. 21.2 Viruses Viruses and virus-like particles (VLPs) have been found in more than 50 species of eukaryotic microalgae, and several of them have been isolated in laboratory cultures (Brussaard 2004; Nagasaki et al. 2005). These viruses are diverse both in size and genome type, and some of them infect harmful algal bloom (HAB)-causing species (Table 21.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Pigment Composition in Four Dinophysis Species (Dinophyceae
    Running head: Dinophysis pigment composition 1 Pigment composition in three Dinophysis species (Dinophyceae) 2 and the associated cultures of Mesodinium rubrum and Teleaulax amphioxeia 3 4 Pilar Rial 1, José Luis Garrido 2, David Jaén 3, Francisco Rodríguez 1* 5 1Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Subida a Radio Faro, 50. 36200 Vigo, Spain. 6 2Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas 7 C/ Eduardo Cabello 6. 36208 Vigo, Spain. 8 3Laboratorio de Control de Calidad de los Recursos Pesqueros, Agapa, Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Medio 9 Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Ctra Punta Umbría-Cartaya Km. 12 21459 Huelva, Spain. 10 *CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: [email protected] 11 12 Despite the discussion around the nature of plastids in Dinophysis, a comparison of pigment 13 signatures in the three-culture system (Dinophysis, the ciliate Mesodinium rubrum and the 14 cryptophyte Teleaulax amphioxeia) has never been reported. We observed similar pigment 15 composition, but quantitative differences, in four Dinophysis species (D. acuminata, D. acuta, D. 16 caudata and D. tripos), Mesodinium and Teleaulax. Dinophysis contained 59-221 fold higher chl a 17 per cell than T. amphioxeia (depending on the light conditions and species). To explain this result, 18 several reasons (e.g. more chloroplasts than previously appreciated and synthesis of new pigments) 19 were are suggested. 20 KEYWORDS: Dinophysis, Mesodinium, Teleaulax, pigments, HPLC. 21 22 INTRODUCTION 23 Photosynthetic Dinophysis species contain plastids of cryptophycean origin (Schnepf and 24 Elbrächter, 1999), but there continues a major controversy around their nature, whether there exist 25 are only kleptoplastids or any permanent ones (García-Cuetos et al., 2010; Park et al., 2010; Kim et 26 al., 2012a).
    [Show full text]
  • 23.3 Groups of Protists
    Chapter 23 | Protists 639 cysts that are a protective, resting stage. Depending on habitat of the species, the cysts may be particularly resistant to temperature extremes, desiccation, or low pH. This strategy allows certain protists to “wait out” stressors until their environment becomes more favorable for survival or until they are carried (such as by wind, water, or transport on a larger organism) to a different environment, because cysts exhibit virtually no cellular metabolism. Protist life cycles range from simple to extremely elaborate. Certain parasitic protists have complicated life cycles and must infect different host species at different developmental stages to complete their life cycle. Some protists are unicellular in the haploid form and multicellular in the diploid form, a strategy employed by animals. Other protists have multicellular stages in both haploid and diploid forms, a strategy called alternation of generations, analogous to that used by plants. Habitats Nearly all protists exist in some type of aquatic environment, including freshwater and marine environments, damp soil, and even snow. Several protist species are parasites that infect animals or plants. A few protist species live on dead organisms or their wastes, and contribute to their decay. 23.3 | Groups of Protists By the end of this section, you will be able to do the following: • Describe representative protist organisms from each of the six presently recognized supergroups of eukaryotes • Identify the evolutionary relationships of plants, animals, and fungi within the six presently recognized supergroups of eukaryotes • Identify defining features of protists in each of the six supergroups of eukaryotes. In the span of several decades, the Kingdom Protista has been disassembled because sequence analyses have revealed new genetic (and therefore evolutionary) relationships among these eukaryotes.
    [Show full text]