Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Fluted Kidneyshell and Slabside Pearlymussel; Final Rule

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Fluted Kidneyshell and Slabside Pearlymussel; Final Rule Vol. 78 Thursday, No. 187 September 26, 2013 Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Fluted Kidneyshell and Slabside Pearlymussel; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:28 Sep 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\26SER3.SGM 26SER3 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES3 59556 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CONTACT). Any additional tools or (970 rmi) of critical habitat in Colbert, supporting information that we Jackson, Limestone, Madison, and Fish and Wildlife Service developed for this critical habitat Marshall Counties, Alabama; designation will be available at the Web Tishomingo County, Mississippi; 50 CFR Part 17 sites and field office address given Bedford, Bledsoe, Claiborne, Cocke, [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2013–0026; above and may also be included in the Franklin, Giles, Greene, Hamblen, 4500030113] preamble of this rule. Hancock, Hickman, Humphreys, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lincoln, Marion, Marshall, Maury, RIN 1018–AZ48 Mary Jennings, Field Supervisor, U.S. Moore, Perry, Polk, and Sequatchie Counties, Tennessee; and Bland, Lee, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Fish and Wildlife Service, Tennessee Russell, Scott, Smyth, Tazewell, and Plants; Designation of Critical Ecological Services Field Office, 446 Neal Street, Cookeville, TN 38501; Washington, and Wythe Counties, Habitat for the Fluted Kidneyshell and Virginia. Slabside Pearlymussel telephone 931–528–6481; facsimile 931–528–7075. If you use a This rule consists of a final rule AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, telecommunications device for the deaf designating critical habitat for the fluted Interior. (TDD), call the Federal Information kidneyshell and slabside pearlymussel. Elsewhere in today’s Federal Register, ACTION: Final rule. Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. we list both species as endangered SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and under the Act. Wildlife Service (Service), designate Executive Summary Peer review and public comment. We critical habitat for the fluted kidneyshell sought comments from independent Why we need to publish a rule. This specialists to ensure that our (Ptychobranchus subtentum) and is a final rule to designate critical slabside pearlymussel (Pleuronaia designation is based on scientifically habitat for the fluted kidneyshell sound data, assumptions, and analyses. dolabelloides) under the Endangered (Ptychobranchus subtentum) and Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We requested opinions from eight slabside pearlymussel (Pleuronaia knowledgeable individuals with These two species are endemic to dolabelloides). Under the Endangered portions of the Cumberland and scientific expertise to review our Species Act (Act), when we determine technical assumptions and analysis, and Tennessee River systems of Alabama, that a species is endangered or Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee, and to determine whether or not we used the threatened we must designate critical best available information. Only one of Virginia. In total, approximately 2,218 habitat to the maximum extent prudent river kilometers (1,380 river miles) in the two peer reviewers who responded and determinable. Designations of commented specifically on the critical Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, critical habitat can only be completed Tennessee, and Virginia fall within the habitat designation. This peer reviewer by issuing a rule. generally concurred with our methods boundaries of the critical habitat Section 4(b)(2) of the Act states that designation. The effect of this regulation and conclusions, and provided the Secretary shall designate critical additional information, clarifications, is to designate critical habitat for the habitat on the basis of the best available fluted kidneyshell and slabside and suggestions to improve this final scientific data after taking into rule. Information we received from peer pearlymussel under the Act for the consideration the economic impact, conservation of the species. review is incorporated in this final national security impact, and any other designation. We received three DATES: This rule is effective on October relevant impact of specifying any comments from the public regarding the 28, 2013. particular area as critical habitat. proposed critical habitat designation ADDRESSES: This final rule is available The areas we are designating in this and the draft economic analysis (DEA). on the Internet at http:// rule constitute our current best We addressed these comments and www.regulations.gov and at http:// assessment of the areas that meet the incorporated public input into this final www.fws.gov/cookeville. Comments and definition of critical habitat for the designation. materials we received, as well as fluted kidneyshell and slabside supporting documentation we used in pearlymussel. Here we are designating Previous Federal Actions preparing this final rule, are available approximately 2,218 river kilometers We proposed listing the fluted for public inspection at http:// (rkm) (1,380 river miles (rmi)) of stream kidneyshell and slabside pearlymussel www.regulations.gov. All of the channel in five States as critical habitat. as endangered under the Act with comments, materials, and For the fluted kidneyshell, we are critical habitat on October 4, 2012 (77 documentation that we considered in designating 24 units covering FR 60804), and announced the this rulemaking are available by approximately 1,899 rkm (1,181 rmi) of availability of a DEA on April 29, 2013 appointment, during normal business critical habitat in Limestone County, (78 FR 25041). The final listing rule can hours, at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Alabama; Jackson, Laurel, McCreary, be found elsewhere in today’s Federal Service, Tennessee Ecological Services Pulaski, Rockcastle, and Wayne Register. All other previous Federal Field Office, 446 Neal Street, Counties, Kentucky; Bedford, Claiborne, actions for these species are described Cookeville, TN 38501; 931–528–6481 Cocke, Fentress, Franklin, Giles, in the proposed rule (77 FR 60804). (telephone); 931–528–7075 (facsimile). Grainger, Greene, Hamblen, Hancock, The coordinates or plot points or both Hickman, Humphreys, Jefferson, Knox, Summary of Comments and from which the maps are generated are Lincoln, Marshall, Maury, Moore, Recommendations included in the administrative record Morgan, Overton, Perry, Pickett, Polk, We requested written comments from for this critical habitat designation and Scott, and Sevier Counties, Tennessee; the public on the proposed designation are available at http:// and Bland, Lee, Russell, Scott, Smyth, of critical habitat for the fluted www.regulations.gov at Docket No. Tazewell, Washington, and Wythe kidneyshell and slabside pearlymussel FWS–R4–ES–2013–0026 and at the Counties, Virginia. For the slabside during two comment periods. The first Tennessee Ecological Services Field pearlymussel, we are designating 13 comment period associated with the Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION units covering approximately 1,562 rkm publication of the proposed rule (77 FR VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:28 Sep 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26SER3.SGM 26SER3 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 59557 60804) opened on October 4, 2012, and degradation or destruction of aquatic of a successful reintroduction program closed on December 3, 2012. We also habitat. implemented by TWRA and other requested comments on the proposed Our Response: We agree that the conservation partners, resulting in the critical habitat designation and TWRA mussel sanctuaries are protective recruitment of the species in the river. associated DEA during a comment of the fluted kidneyshell and slabside In 2010, six individuals were collected period that opened on April 29, 2013, pearlymussel, and we have incorporated during a quantitative survey at Lillard’s and closed on May 29, 2013. We this into the Special Management Mill in the Duck River, confirming some received one request for a public Considerations or Protection section of level of survival and persistence of the hearing. We held a public hearing in this final rule. reintroduced population (Hubbs et al. Abingdon, Virginia, on May 14, 2013. (2) Comment: In several critical 2011, p. 18). We also contacted appropriate Federal, habitat unit descriptions, the host fish We had no information at the time of State, and local agencies; scientific species for the slabside pearlymussel are the proposed rule to show that experts and organizations; and other identified but not the host fish for the monitoring efforts in the Nolichucky interested parties and invited them to fluted kidneyshell. Host fish for the River had confirmed the survival and comment on the proposal. Newspaper fluted kidneyshell are also found in persistence of reintroduced fluted notices inviting general public comment these rivers (Nolichucky, Hiwassee, Elk, kidneyshell. Since that time, Hubbs were published in newspapers covering and Buffalo Rivers). (2012, pers. comm.) confirmed that the all affected counties in Alabama, Our Response: We agree the host Nolichucky River retains a large number Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee, and fishes for the fluted kidneyshell are of adult individuals. Therefore, we have Virginia. found in the
Recommended publications
  • Fish Inventory at Stones River National Battlefield
    Fish Inventory at Stones River National Battlefield Submitted to: Department of the Interior National Park Service Cumberland Piedmont Network By Dennis Mullen Professor of Biology Department of Biology Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro, TN 37132 September 2006 Striped Shiner (Luxilus chrysocephalus) – nuptial male From Lytle Creek at Fortress Rosecrans Photograph by D. Mullen Table of Contents List of Tables……………………………………………………………………….iii List of Figures………………………………………………………………………iv List of Appendices…………………………………………………………………..v Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………...……..2 Methods……………………………………………………………………………...3 Results……………………………………………………………………………….7 Discussion………………………………………………………………………….10 Conclusions………………………………………………………………………...14 Literature Cited…………………………………………………………………….15 ii List of Tables Table1: Location and physical characteristics (during September 2006, and only for the riverine sites) of sample sites for the STRI fish inventory………………………………17 Table 2: Biotic Integrity classes used in assessing fish communities along with general descriptions of their attributes (Karr et al. 1986) ………………………………………18 Table 3: List of fishes potentially occurring in aquatic habitats in and around Stones River National Battlefield………………………………………………………………..19 Table 4: Fish species list (by site) of aquatic habitats at STRI (October 2004 – August 2006). MF = McFadden’s Ford, KP = King Pond, RB = Redoubt Brannan, UP = Unnamed Pond at Redoubt Brannan, LC = Lytle Creek at Fortress Rosecrans……...….22 Table 5: Fish Species Richness estimates for the 3 riverine reaches of STRI and a composite estimate for STRI as a whole…………………………………………………24 Table 6: Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) scores for three stream reaches at Stones River National Battlefield during August 2005………………………………………………...25 Table 7: Temperature and water chemistry of four of the STRI sample sites for each sampling date…………………………………………………………………………….26 Table 8 : Total length estimates of specific habitat types at each riverine sample site.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • June 11, 2018.Indd
    6,250 subscribers www.TML1.org Volume 69, Number 10 June 11, 2018 Free Conference mobile app available Connects to all smartphone devices June 9 - 12 in Knoxville A mobile app featuring the an event will reveal a description; 2018 Annual Conference infor- and if it’s a workshop, speaker bios mation is available for free and is are also available. As an added New sessions added to accessible from any smart phone feature, you can create your own device. personal schedule by touching the Annual Conference lineup The app was developed by plus symbol next to events. You Protecting the availability of the Tennessee Municipal League can also set reminders for yourself. a clean and reliable water supply to help improve smartphone us- Conference events are color-coded in Tennessee is vital to support ers conference experience with by each event type. By using the fil- the state’s growing population and this easy to use digital guide. It ter button at the top to apply a filter, sustain economic growth. contains detailed conference in- you can quickly reference catego- Deputy Governor Jim Henry formation on workshops, speakers, ries such as food, workshops, or and TDEC Commissioner Shari exhibitors and special events – and special events. Meghreblian will help kickoff a it’s all at your fingertips. Speakers. To learn about each panel of local government officials To download the free app, of our conference speakers, scroll and industry leaders to discuss it’s as easy as searching for “2018 through the list and tap on the concerns about the state’s aging TML Annual Conference” in the speaker’s photo to reveal their bios.
    [Show full text]
  • Where to Go Camping Guidebook
    2010 Greater Alabama Council Where to Go Camp ing Guidebook Published by the COOSA LODGE WHERE TO GO CAMPING GUIDE Table of Contents In Council Camps 2 High Adventure Bases 4 Alabama State Parks 7 Georgia State Parks 15 Mississippi State Parks 18 Tennessee State Parks 26 Wildlife Refuge 40 Points of Interest 40 Wetlands 41 Places to Hike 42 Sites to See 43 Maps 44 Order of the Arrow 44 Future/ Wiki 46 Boy Scouts Camps Council Camps CAMPSITES Each Campsite is equipped with a flagpole, trashcan, faucet, and latrine (Except Eagle and Mountain Goat) with washbasin. On the side of the latrine is a bulletin board that the troop can use to post assignments, notices, and duty rosters. Camp Comer has two air-conditioned shower and restroom facilities for camp-wide use. Patrol sites are pre-established in each campsite. Most campsites have some Adarondaks that sleep four and tents on platforms that sleep two. Some sites may be occupied by more than one troop. Troops are encouraged to construct gateways to their campsites. The Hawk Campsite is a HANDICAPPED ONLY site, if you do not have a scout or leader that is handicapped that site will not be available. There are four troop / campsites; each campsite has a latrine, picnic table and fire ring. Water may be obtained at spigots near the pavilion. Garbage is disposed of at the Tannehill trash dumpster. Each unit is responsible for providing its trash bags and taking garbage to the trash dumpster. The campsites have a number and a name. Make reservations at a Greater Alabama Council Service Center; be sure to specify the campsite or sites desired.
    [Show full text]
  • Part IV: Scoring Criteria for the Index of Biotic Integrity to Monitor
    Part IV: Scoring Criteria for the Index of Biotic Integrity to Monitor Fish Communities in Wadeable Streams in the Coosa and Tennessee Drainage Basins of the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion of Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division Fisheries Management Section 2020 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………… ……... Pg. 1 Map of Ridge and Valley Ecoregion………………………………..……............... Pg. 3 Table 1. State Listed Fish in the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion……………………. Pg. 4 Table 2. IBI Metrics and Scoring Criteria………………………………………….Pg. 5 References………………………………………………….. ………………………Pg. 7 Appendix 1…………………………………………………………………. ………Pg. 8 Coosa Basin Group (ACT) MSR Graphs..………………………………….Pg. 9 Tennessee Basin Group (TEN) MSR Graphs……………………………….Pg. 17 Ridge and Valley Ecoregion Fish List………………………………………Pg. 25 i Introduction The Ridge and Valley ecoregion is one of the six Level III ecoregions found in Georgia (Part 1, Figure 1). It is drained by two major river basins, the Coosa and the Tennessee, in the northwestern corner of Georgia. The Ridge and Valley ecoregion covers nearly 3,000 square miles (United States Census Bureau 2000) and includes all or portions of 10 counties (Figure 1), bordering the Piedmont ecoregion to the south and the Blue Ridge ecoregion to the east. A small portion of the Southwestern Appalachians ecoregion is located in the upper northwestern corner of the Ridge and Valley ecoregion. The biotic index developed by the GAWRD is based on Level III ecoregion delineations (Griffith et al. 2001). The metrics and scoring criteria adapted to the Ridge and Valley ecoregion were developed from biomonitoring samples collected in the two major river basins that drain the Ridge and Valley ecoregion, the Coosa (ACT) and the Tennessee (TEN).
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana's State Endangered and Special Concern Species
    Indiana Division of Fish & Wildlife Endangered and Special Concern Species STATE ENDANGERED: Any animal species whose prospects for survival or recruitment within the state are in immediate jeopardy and are in danger of disappearing from the state. This includes all species classified as endangered by the federal government that occur in Indiana. STATE SPECIAL CONCERN: Any animal species requiring monitoring because of known/suspected limited abundance or distribution or because of a recent change in legal status or required habitat. FEDERALLY ENDANGERED: Any species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. Designated with “(FE)”. FEDERALLY THREATENED: Any species that is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. Designated with “(FT)”. FEDERAL FEDERAL CANDIDATE: Species for which there is sufficient information to propose as endangered or threatened, but the development of a proposed listing regulation is precluded by other higher priority listing activities. Designated with “(FC)”. M A M M A L S State Endangered Special Concern Gray Myotis (FE) Myotis grisescens Smoky Shrew Sorex fumeus Indiana Myotis (FE) Myotis sodalis Pygmy Shrew Sorex hoyi Evening Bat Nycticeius humeralis Star-nosed Mole Condylura cristata Swamp Rabbit Sylvilagus aquaticus Southeastern Myotis Myotis austroriparius Franklin’s Ground Squirrel Spermophilus franklinii Eastern small-footed Myotis Myotis leibii Allegheny Woodrat Neotoma magister Little Brown
    [Show full text]
  • Guiding Species Recovery Through Assessment of Spatial And
    Guiding Species Recovery through Assessment of Spatial and Temporal Population Genetic Structure of Two Critically Endangered Freshwater Mussel Species (Bivalvia: Unionidae) Jess Walter Jones ( [email protected] ) United States Fish and Wildlife Service Timothy W. Lane Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries N J Eric M. Hallerman Virginia Tech: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Research Article Keywords: Freshwater mussels, Epioblasma brevidens, E. capsaeformis, endangered species, spatial and temporal genetic variation, effective population size, species recovery planning, conservation genetics Posted Date: March 16th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-282423/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/28 Abstract The Cumberlandian Combshell (Epioblasma brevidens) and Oyster Mussel (E. capsaeformis) are critically endangered freshwater mussel species native to the Tennessee and Cumberland River drainages, major tributaries of the Ohio River in the eastern United States. The Clinch River in northeastern Tennessee (TN) and southwestern Virginia (VA) harbors the only remaining stronghold population for either species, containing tens of thousands of individuals per species; however, a few smaller populations are still extant in other rivers. We collected and analyzed genetic data to assist with population restoration and recovery planning for both species. We used an 888 base-pair sequence of the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase 1 (ND1) gene and ten nuclear DNA microsatellite loci to assess patterns of genetic differentiation and diversity in populations at small and large spatial scales, and at a 9-year (2004 to 2013) temporal scale, which showed how quickly these populations can diverge from each other in a short time period.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT FOR: Preliminary Analysis for Identification, Distribution, And
    REPORT FOR: Preliminary Analysis for Identification, Distribution, and Conservation Status of Species of Fusconaia and Pleurobema in Arkansas Principle Investigators: Alan D. Christian Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, P.O. Box 599, State University, Arkansas 72467; [email protected]; Phone: (870)972-3082; Fax: (870)972-2638 John L. Harris Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, P.O. Box 599, State University, Arkansas 72467 Jeanne Serb Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, 251 Bessey Hall, Ames, Iowa 50011 Graduate Research Assistant: David M. Hayes, Department of Environmental Science, P.O. Box 847, State University, Arkansas 72467: [email protected] Kentaro Inoue, Department of Environmental Science, P.O. Box 847, State University, Arkansas 72467: [email protected] Submitted to: William R. Posey Malacologist and Commercial Fisheries Biologist, AGFC P.O. Box 6740 Perrytown, Arkansas 71801 April 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There are currently 13 species of Fusconaia and 32 species of Pleurobema recognized in the United States and Canada. Twelve species of Pleurobema and two species of Fusconaia are listed as Threatened or Endangered. There are 75 recognized species of Unionidae in Arkansas; however this number may be much higher due to the presence of cryptic species, many which may reside within the Fusconaia /Pleurobema complex. Currently, three species of Fusconaia and three species of Pleurobema are recognized from Arkansas. The true conservation status of species within these genera cannot be determined until the taxonomic identity of populations is confirmed. The purpose of this study was to begin preliminary analysis of the species composition of Fusconaia and Pleurobema in Arkansas and to determine the phylogeographic relationships within these genera through mitochondrial DNA sequencing and conchological analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mussel Survey of Clinchport, Clinch River, Virginia: Augmentation Monitoring Site: 2006
    Freshwater Mussel Survey of Clinchport, Clinch River, Virginia: Augmentation Monitoring Site: 2006 By: Nathan L. Eckert, Joe J. Ferraro, Michael J. Pinder, and Brian T. Watson Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Wildlife Diversity Division October 28th, 2008 Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................... 4 Objective ............................................................................................................................ 5 Study Area ......................................................................................................................... 6 Methods.............................................................................................................................. 6 Results .............................................................................................................................. 10 Semi-quantitative .................................................................................................. 10 Quantitative........................................................................................................... 11 Qualitative............................................................................................................. 12 Incidental............................................................................................................... 12 Discussion........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Final Programmatic
    Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Final Programmatic Biological Opinion and Conference Opinion on the United States Department of the Interior Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement’s Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act Title V Regulatory Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Program Division of Environmental Review Falls Church, Virginia October 16, 2020 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................3 2 Consultation History .........................................................................................................4 3 Background .......................................................................................................................5 4 Description of the Action ...................................................................................................7 The Mining Process .............................................................................................................. 8 4.1.1 Exploration ........................................................................................................................ 8 4.1.2 Erosion and Sedimentation Controls .................................................................................. 9 4.1.3 Clearing and Grubbing ....................................................................................................... 9 4.1.4 Excavation of Overburden and Coal ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Report (ER) (TVA 2003) in Conjunction with Its Application for Renewal of the BFN Ols, As Provided for by the Following NRC Regulations
    Biological Assessment Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal Review Limestone County, Alabama October 2004 Docket Numbers 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Biological Assessment of the Potential Effects on Endangered or Threatened Species from the Proposed License Renewal for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 1.0 Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licenses the operation of domestic nuclear power plants in accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and NRC implementing regulations. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) operates Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 (BFN) pursuant to NRC operating license (OL) numbers DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68, which expire on December 20, 2013, June 28, 2014, and July 2, 2016, respectively. TVA has prepared an Environmental Report (ER) (TVA 2003) in conjunction with its application for renewal of the BFN OLs, as provided for by the following NRC regulations: C Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 54, “Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants,” Section 54.23, Contents of application - environmental information (10 CFR 54.23). C Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 51, “Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions,” Section 51.53, Postconstruction environmental reports, Subsection 51.53(c), Operating license renewal stage (10 CFR 51.53(c)). The renewed OLs would allow up to 20 additional years of plant operation beyond the current licensed operating term. No major refurbishment or replacement of important systems, structures, or components are expected during the 20-year BFN license renewal term.
    [Show full text]