DOCSLIB.ORG

The Attitudes of British Jews Towards Israel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Attitudes of British Jews Towards Israel Stephen Miller Margaret Harris The Attitudes Colin Shindler of British Jews Editorial adviser: Edward Temko Towards Israel Department of Sociology School of Arts and Social Sciences City University London The lead author is Stephen Miller, Emeritus Professor of Social Research, City University London Margaret Harris is Emeritus Professor of Voluntary Sector Organisations, Aston University, Birmingham; Visiting Professor at Birkbeck, University of London Colin Shindler is Emeritus Professor of Israel Studies, SOAS Edward Temko is a writer and former editor of ‘The Jewish Chronicle’ The Attitudes of British Jews Towards Israel CONTENTS Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................p5 Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................................p7 Methodology .....................................................................................................................................................p12 Findings..............................................................................................................................................................p15 Part A Commitment and Attachment............................................................................................p15 Part B Key Issues..................................................................................................................................p16 B1 The desire for peace.........................................................................................................p16 B2 Support for a two-state solution....................................................................................p18 B3 Attitudes to settlement expansion................................................................................p19 B4 Control of the West Bank – security and demography.............................................p20 B5 Obstacles to peace............................................................................................................p22 B6 Perceptions of Israel’s desire for peace........................................................................p23 B7 The right to criticse and the place to do it..................................................................p24 B8 The Gaza conflict of summer 2014...............................................................................p25 B9 The term ‘Zionist’.............................................................................................................p28 B10 Knowing others’ minds.................................................................................................p30 Part C Variations in attitudes to Israel..........................................................................................p32 C1 A scale of hawkishness-dovishness..............................................................................p32 C2 The relationship between H-D scores and other variables.....................................p32 C3 Predictive power of variables associated with dovishness–hawkishness...........p35 C4 Synagogue affiliation and dovish-hawkish attitudes...............................................p37 C5 Synagogue groups and criticism of Israel...................................................................p39 C6 Variations in dovishness with age................................................................................p40 C7 Variations in dovishness with education....................................................................p42 C8 Aliyah and anti-Semitism..............................................................................................p44 Concluding comments....................................................................................................................................p46 Appendix 1: Sampling methodology...........................................................................................................p49 Appendix 2: Advisory panel..........................................................................................................................p53 Appendix 3: Attitude statements used to construct the Hawishness-Dovishness (H-D) scale......p54 3 The Attitudes of British Jews Towards Israel INTRODUCTION The relationship between that British Jewish opinions on the funding body. The data collection British Jews and Israel is political issues confronting Israel was undertaken by the independent the focus of intense debate, are diverse and not easily captured research organisation Ipsos MORI political analysis and by simple monolithic statements. and the questionnaire was designed communal interest. Yet as a In particular, it found that opinions by the authors working with Ipsos field of empirical research, that are highly critical of Israel’s MORI’s Social Research Institute with one notable exception1, conduct and policies may often and with advice from a panel of British Jewish attitudes to co-exist with clear support for its Jewish lay and professional advisers Israel are rarely investigated legitimacy and survival. (see Appendix 2). and poorly understood. This makes it easy for speculation The JPR research was the first Structure of the report and assertion to triumph over robust attempt to calibrate British evidence; and it means that the Jewish attitudes towards Israel and This report is in three sections: representation of the British its conflict with the Palestinians. Jewish community’s stance on The present study addresses Section 1 summarizes the research Israel, and the quality of its similar issues some five years methodology, with a fuller account internal discourse, are both on – post the 2014 Gaza conflict, of the sampling strategy set out in undermined. the emergence of ISIS, further Appendix 1. expansion of the settlements, This report seeks to improve the increased boycott activity and a Section 2 sets out the key findings, evidence base available to scholars raft of other political developments. divided into three parts: with an interest in perceptions We have repeated some of the JPR of Israel. It provides up-to-date, attitude measurements and we have A - examines overall attitudes to reliable data on the way British also looked at attitudes to some Israel as a Jewish state; Jews see Israel and how they new issues, including sanctions construe their own obligations against Israel, the demographic B - provides a detailed analysis of towards it. Using standard research balance between Jews and Arabs, attitudes to specific issues; and methodologies, we have collected and priorities for the new (2015) data on the attitudes of 1131 British Israeli government. This study C - plots variations in attitude Jews towards Israel’s policies and also examines for the first time the across different sections of the conduct, and also assessed their accuracy with which individual Jews community and examines feelings about its approach to can assess the representativeness of which factors are associated peace and negotiations with the their own views about Israel. with having hawkish and Palestinians. dovish opinions Our report sets out the key statistical The research was conducted in findings and offers a straightforward Section 3 points briefly to some key the period March to July 2015, interpretation of what they show. findings which appear to us to have roughly one year after the conflict Some brief comments on the implications for the British Jewish in Gaza in the summer of 2014, and possible implications of those community and its relationship with some five years after the Institute findings are included in the final Israel. for Jewish Policy Research (JPR) section of the report. published its landmark study on the same theme. That research The research was funded by Yachad - demonstrated Israel’s central role in a pro-Israel, pro-peace campaigning the construction of Jewish identity. group – and we are grateful to It found almost universal support for the board, director and staff for Israel’s legitimacy as the ancestral supporting our work. However, the homeland of the Jewish people design and analysis of the survey and a strong desire for peace and was undertaken by the research security. The JPR study also showed team working independently of the 1 ‘Committed, concerned and conciliatory: the attitudes of Jews in Britain towards Israel’. D.Graham and J.Boyd, JPR Report, July 2010. 5 The Attitudes of British Jews Towards Israel EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report explores the attitudes of 1131 British Jews towards Israel and its ongoing conflict with the Palestinians. The research was conducted in the period March to July 2015, roughly one year after the 2014 Gaza conflict. • The research examines the nature of British Jewish attachment to Israel and the level of support for its current policies and conduct. It covers a wide range of issues including attitudes towards settlement expansion, Palestinian rights, the 2014 Gaza conflict, sanctions against Israel, the demographic balance between Jews and Arabs, the need for security and priorities for the new Israeli government. • The research also examines how attitudes to Israel vary with age, synagogue affiliation, level of education and political stance. And it explores for the first time, the ability of British Jews to assess the extent to which their own views are representative of the Jewish community as a whole. • Data collection was based on an online
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JEW HATRED Anti-Semitism in Emulate the Growth and Influence of Its European Counterparts
    CJM OWALJUSIKWHS JEW HATRED Anti-Semitism in emulate the growth and influence of its European counterparts. Groups such as Britain Today the British National Party are scorned by the vast majority of Britons and are Anti-Semitism is, in many ways, the relatively powerless in the mainstream precursor of the racist attitudes now political process. projected by European societies on the The Far Right's influence, however, visible ethnic minorities within their on racial and political tension and midst. Jews remain the primary, violence, is manifest in localised areas of ideological, target for hard-core racists, power across the country. Racial attacks but the vast bulk of societal racism, in Tower Hamlets increased by over prejudice and actual physical attacks are 300% following the BNP's Millwall Edmonton Cemetery April 1990 directed against visible minority groups council seat election success in of Afro-Caribbean, India sub-continent, September '93. The Millwall victory (Nov '92); and the initial Allied air strikes or North African origin. This is confirmed (since overturned in the May '94 local against Iraq (Jan '91). by a number of recent opinion polls elections) gave an unprecedented boost The next highest increase followed conducted throughout Europe and Britain to the BNP's morale and public profile. the highly publicised desecration of the by the American Jewish Committee in Jewish cemetery in Carpentras, France which Jews were consistently viewed Anti-Semitic Incidents and Attacks (May '90). This is an indicator of the more favourably than other minority Anglo-Jewry's representative body, the influence of publicity on racist attacks, a groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Session of the Zionist General Council
    SESSION OF THE ZIONIST GENERAL COUNCIL THIRD SESSION AFTER THE 26TH ZIONIST CONGRESS JERUSALEM JANUARY 8-15, 1967 Addresses,; Debates, Resolutions Published by the ORGANIZATION DEPARTMENT OF THE ZIONIST EXECUTIVE JERUSALEM AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE n Library י»B I 3 u s t SESSION OF THE ZIONIST GENERAL COUNCIL THIRD SESSION AFTER THE 26TH ZIONIST CONGRESS JERUSALEM JANUARY 8-15, 1966 Addresses, Debates, Resolutions Published by the ORGANIZATION DEPARTMENT OF THE ZIONIST EXECUTIVE JERUSALEM iii THE THIRD SESSION of the Zionist General Council after the Twenty-sixth Zionist Congress was held in Jerusalem on 8-15 January, 1967. The inaugural meeting was held in the Binyanei Ha'umah in the presence of the President of the State and Mrs. Shazar, the Prime Minister, the Speaker of the Knesset, Cabinet Ministers, the Chief Justice, Judges of the Supreme Court, the State Comptroller, visitors from abroad, public dignitaries and a large and representative gathering which filled the entire hall. The meeting was opened by Mr. Jacob Tsur, Chair- man of the Zionist General Council, who paid homage to Israel's Nobel Prize Laureate, the writer S.Y, Agnon, and read the message Mr. Agnon had sent to the gathering. Mr. Tsur also congratulated the poetess and writer, Nellie Zaks. The speaker then went on to discuss the gravity of the time for both the State of Israel and the Zionist Move- ment, and called upon citizens in this country and Zionists throughout the world to stand shoulder to shoulder to over- come the crisis. Professor Andre Chouraqui, Deputy Mayor of the City of Jerusalem, welcomed the delegates on behalf of the City.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Is Indeed a ‘Potentially Seismic Change’ in the Way British Jews Feel About Israel and the Manner in Which They Discuss Israel
    Fathom Journal British Jewry and Israel - how is the relationship evolving? A symposium TOBY GREENE KEITH KHAN-HARRIS SIR MICK DAVIS TAMARA BERENS SIMON GORDON ROBIN MOSS HANNAH WEISFELD MAYA IIANY RABBI LAURA JANNER-KLAUSNER JONATHAN HUNTER 1 CONTRIBUTORS Mick Davis, the Former Chairman of the Jewish Leadership Council Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner, Senior Rabbi to Reform Judaism Dr Keith Kahn-Harris, a senior lecturer at Leo Baeck College and Fellow of the Institute for Jewish Policy Research Dr Toby Greene, Contributing Fathom Editor, co-author of ‘The Israelization of British Jewry: Between Home and Homeland’ Hannah Weisfeld and Maya Ilany, director and deputy directof of Yachad – Together for Israel Together for Peace Robin Moss, UJIA Director of Strategy (writing in a personal capacity) Simon Gordon, who served as speechwriter to Israeli Ambassador Daniel Taub and Douglas Carswell MP Jonathan Hunter, co-founder of the Pinsker Centre Tamara Berens, former President of Kings College Israel Society and a Campus Associate with CAMERA on Campus (writing in a personal capacity) 2 EDITORIAL In July 2018, the Jewish Chronicle identified ‘fundamental questions which must now be urgently asked’ in light of what it termed the ‘potentially seismic change’ in relations between British Jews and Israel. The editorial cited as examples the open letter signed by 100 leaders and graduates of mainstream left-wing Zionist movements, asserting that ‘ending the occupation… is a principle of our Zionism’ and the group of young British Jews who said ‘Kaddish for Gaza’ in Parliament Square. The Fathom editors believe that the journal can provide a useful platform for this ongoing debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 160KB
    Written evidence from Board of Deputies of British Jews Introduction The Board of Deputies of British Jews is the democratic and representative body for the UK’s Jewish community. We are the first port of call for Government, the media and others seeking to understand the Jewish community’s interests and concerns. The post-death legal system, and care for bereaved families, is a perennial concern for the Jewish community, given how increased referrals to the Coroners in recent decades have had the capacity to interfere with Jewish burial and mourning traditions. Therefore, by way of background, we have included in this submission: Board of Deputies’ proposals from April 2018 that made recommendations as to reforms of the Coroner system The Board of Deputies submission to the All Party Parliamentary Group for Funerals and Bereavement June 2014 investigation into delays between death and burial or cremation. These two documents outline reforms that, in the view of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, would ensure a post-death legal system which was much more faith sensitive. However, to focus on the particular questions the inquiry has posed, it should be made clear that the Jewish community has excellent relations with the vast majority of Coroners, who accommodate the requirements of the Jewish community, especially in regard to early release of bodies and non- invasive autopsy. This is almost entirely due to the building up of individual relationships - there is very little systemic guarantee of such provision. Hence, when a Coroner does not wish to accommodate the needs of a local Jewish community, there appears to be little that can be done.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Jewry's Experience of Secondary Education
    Anglo-Jewry’s Experience of Secondary Education from the 1830s until 1920 Emma Tanya Harris A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements For award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Hebrew and Jewish Studies University College London London 2007 1 UMI Number: U592088 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592088 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract of Thesis This thesis examines the birth of secondary education for Jews in England, focusing on the middle classes as defined in the text. This study explores various types of secondary education that are categorised under one of two generic terms - Jewish secondary education or secondary education for Jews. The former describes institutions, offered by individual Jews, which provided a blend of religious and/or secular education. The latter focuses on non-Jewish schools which accepted Jews (and some which did not but were, nevertheless, attended by Jews). Whilst this work emphasises London and its environs, other areas of Jewish residence, both major and minor, are also investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Boisi Center Interviews No
    the boisi center interviews no. 100: march 11, 2015 antony lerman, author of The Making and Unmaking of a Zionist, and Bos- ton College political science professor and Boisi Center director alan wolfe sat down with Boisi Center associate director Erik Owens and undergraduate research assistant Evan Goldstein before Lerman’s presentation on a “new paradigm” for Israeli Jewish-Palestinian peace and reconciliation. owens: What is the current state of years ago when it was thought that the movement. They started in the UK, and the Jewish communities in Britain and community was declining so much, have expanded all over the world. To give America, and how are the two different? the question of whether there would be you the size of it: the main event is a Jewish grandchildren was discussed, and gathering around Christmas-New Year, lerman: A good place to start is size, there was a movement of educational when Jews are not otherwise occupied. because there’s obviously a vast discrep- revival—opening up Jewish schools, and Twenty-five hundred people gather at a ancy. There are about 300,000 self-iden- university campus to listen to a myriad tifying Jews in Britain. Most British Jews of lectures and take part in self-study and live in London. Jews used to live in all music classes and Talmud and anything, kinds of outlying places, such as in South really, that comes within Jewish purview. Wales, in the mining villages, out in the It’s an example that there is a hunger for countryside as well. About 60 percent that kind of thing.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Publication
    THE PLURALITY OF PLURALISM: YOUTH MOVEMENTS AND THE COMMUNAL DISCOURSE OF JEWISH DIVERSITY Sarah Abramson ABSTRACT This article examines the ways in which British Jewish youth movements support, denounce and struggle with the concept of Jewish pluralism and how these actions mimic or diverge from wider communal debates. I argue that these young leaders often consider their approaches to intra- Jewish diversity to be more nuanced than the two dominant (and polar- ised) communal positions on pluralism. I conclude that youth movements provide an important space for engaging with notions of pluralism in more controversial and significant ways than can be seen in wider British Jewish debates on the issue, but these movements devise educational agendas that are still constrained by a fear of transgressing against the increasingly controversial concept of a singular ‘authentic’ Judaism. WHAT IS [JEWISH] PLURALISM? ccording to the philosopher David Archard, “[t]he starting point for any discussion of pluralism is a recognition that we inhabit A a world of difference” (1996, p. 1). Pluralism is a basic tenet of (post) modern Western existence; existing alongside a plurality of other types of people is now often understood as a given fact. As a result, academic sociological literature tends to analyse attempts to live with pluralism (integration, assimilation and cohesion studies) rather than analyses of pluralism as a theoretical concept (ibid). Yet the sociology of religion, or sociology about religious groups, requires a more careful consideration of pluralism as a theoretical category The Jewish Journal of Sociology, vol. 3, 2011 04 Abramson 057-080.indd 57 19/10/2011 09:22 SARAH ABRAMSON of analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Jpr / Report Institute for Jewish Policy Research October 2015
    jpr / report Institute for Jewish Policy Research October 2015 Strictly Orthodox rising: What the demography of British Jews tells us about the future of the community L. Daniel Staetsky and Jonathan Boyd The Institute for Jewish Policy Research (JPR) is a London-based independent research organisation, consultancy and think-tank. It aims to advance the prospects of Jewish communities in Britain and across Europe by conducting research and developing policy in partnership with those best placed to influence Jewish life. Authors Dr Daniel Staetsky is a Senior Research Fellow at JPR. His expertise spans the disciplines of demography, applied statistics and economics, and he is a former researcher and analyst at the Central Bureau of Statistics in Israel and at RAND Europe. He holds a PhD in social statistics from the University of Southampton, and an MA in demography from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, where he specialised in Jewish and Israeli demography and migration. His work in Jewish demography has been widely published. Dr Jonathan Boyd is Executive Director of JPR. A specialist in the study of contemporary Jewry, he is a former Jerusalem Fellow at the Mandel Institute in Israel, and has held professional positions in research and policy at the JDC International Centre for Community Development, the Jewish Agency, the UJIA and the Holocaust Educational Trust. He holds a doctorate in educational philosophy from the University of Nottingham, and a BA and MA in modern Jewish history from University College London. JPR Report October
    [Show full text]
  • UJS Conference 2020 Motions
    UJS Conference 2020 Motions Campus Motion Title: CA3 Fighting Antisemitism with the Jewish Labour Movement Proposer’s name: Jack Lubner Proposer’s J-Soc: Cambridge Seconder’s name: Toby Kunin Seconder’s J-Soc: Warwick What’s the idea? 1. The issue of antisemitism in the Labour Party has been incredibly difficult for the Jewish community and for Jewish students in particular, who have faced antisemitism on campus. 2. The Labour Party’s new leadership have made promising steps in dealing with the problem of antisemitism in Labour but there is still a long way to go. 3. The Jewish Labour Movement (JLM) played a key role in the fight against antisemitism, having referred the Labour Party to the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) – which found it guilty of committing three unlawful acts. 4. UJS has worked with JLM in the past to provide antisemitism awareness training on campus. How do you want it to happen? 1. UJS should continue to work alongside the Jewish Labour Movement in co-hosting events to share the experiences of Jewish students. 2. If antisemitism awareness training in University Labour Clubs resumes, UJS should facilitate training with JLM. UJS should be in regular contact with JLM to coordinate efforts to fight antisemitism on campus when it arises in Labour Party spaces. Motion Title: CA6 Committing to Fight All Forms of Antisemitism Proposer’s name: Millie Walker Proposer’s J-Soc: Leeds Seconder’s name: Tamar Klajman Seconder’s J-Soc: UCL What’s the idea? 1. Antisemitism is rising at an alarming rate at universities across the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Mortality of British Jews at the Turn of the 20Th Century in a Comparative Perspective Laura Staetsky
    Mortality of British Jews at the Turn of the 20th Century in a Comparative Perspective Laura Staetsky To cite this version: Laura Staetsky. Mortality of British Jews at the Turn of the 20th Century in a Comparative Perspec- tive. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie, 2011, 27 (3), pp.361-385. 10.1007/s10680-011-9239-9. hal-00664101 HAL Id: hal-00664101 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00664101 Submitted on 29 Jan 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Author: Laura Staetsky Title: Mortality of British Jews at the turn of the 20th century in comparative perspective Affiliation: RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 1YG, United Kingdom. This paper was prepared while the author was at Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected] OR [email protected] Tel. +44 1223 222 742 Fax +44 1223 358 845 Abstract This paper presents analysis of mortality data of British Jews. Not much was known about mortality of British Jews until recently. Recent availability of mortality data of British Jews represents a remarkable development in Jewish demography.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Israel Education
    Moving Israel Education Report about Israel Education within the UK Jewish Community commissioned by Pears Foundation Prepared by Makom: the Israel Education Lab Written by Yonatan Ariel and Robbie Gringras with Alexandra Benjamin October 2013, Cheshvan 5774 makomisrael.org | facebook.com/makomisrael | @makomisrael Contents Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................2 About this report ..............................................................................................................................................4 What is Israel Education? ...............................................................................................................................6 Data Analysis: concepts, motifs, and milieux ....................................................................................... 10 Complexity in Israel Education.............................................................................................................. 10 The relationship between Education and Advocacy ....................................................................... 11 The Sweep of Jewish History ................................................................................................................. 14 The Locale .................................................................................................................................................... 14 Secondary Schools in particular .............................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Legacy of Rabbi Mordechai Fachler Z”L
    Contents Welcome to the Pesach edition of Diary 2 Hamaor 5771 Delayed Burial 6 You Did it for Him! 8 I sincerely hope that you enjoy The Curtain - Part II 9 reading Hamaor - your essential Federation magazine and that it Gabbai’s Conference 13 enhances your Pesach experience. Vehigadto Levincho - Anticipating the challenges 14 Even though yetzias Mitzrayim took place over three thousand years ago, today we still continue to Freedom’s in the air - celebrate, talk and learn about it. In the pages that Pesach and the Arab revolt 16 follow, you’ll find a number of articles that help us to Redemption - Then & Now 18 do just that, providing an in-depth look and Seder Etiquette 20 fascinating insights into perhaps the most familiar of all our Yom Tovim. In addition, this year we have a The Exodus: Remembering vs. Recounting 22 special pull-out booklet, written by Chazan Michael Rabbi Mordechai Fachler Z”L 23 Simon, packed with inspiration for your Seder. Zayin Adar Seuda 26 Obituaries 27 Within the magazine you’ll find contributions by Rabbi Yehuda Aronovitz, Rabbi Johnny Solomon Rebbetzin Family Hamaor Barbara Friedman and others as well as Federation Insights 29 President Mr Alan Finlay and Chief Executive Dr Eli Paschal Musings 30 Kienwald, along with news and events from our communities which prove that the Federation of Recipes 31 Synagogues is as vibrant and active as well as diverse Personal 34 as ever. Kashrus Directory 37 Federation of Synagogues If you’re looking for inspiration in the kitchen then head straight for our mouth-watering Pesach recipe Contact Details 38 page.
    [Show full text]