DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydrology of and Current Monitoring Issues for the Chicago Area Waterway System, Northeastern Illinois

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydrology of and Current Monitoring Issues for the Chicago Area Waterway System, Northeastern Illinois Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency– Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Hydrology of and Current Monitoring Issues for the Chicago Area Waterway System, Northeastern Illinois Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5115 Version 1.1, March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover: A USGS crew prepares for an acoustic Doppler current meter discharge measurement on the South Branch of the Chicago River, part of the Chicago Area Waterway System. Hydrology of and Current Monitoring Issues for the Chicago Area Waterway System, Northeastern Illinois By James J. Duncker and Kevin K. Johnson Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency– Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5115 Version 1.1, March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Sally Jewell, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 First release: 2015 Revised: March 2016 (ver 1.1) For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Duncker, J.J. and Johnson, K.K., 2016, Hydrology of and current monitoring issues for the Chicago Area Waterway System, northeastern Illinois (ver. 1.1 March 2016): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5115, 48 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20155115. ISSN 2328-0328 (online) iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................3 Chronology of Construction and Regulation for the Chicago Area Waterway System ...........3 Chicago Area Hydrology ...............................................................................................................................5 Precipitation...........................................................................................................................................5 Groundwater ..........................................................................................................................................6 Surface Water .......................................................................................................................................9 North Shore Channel ................................................................................................................10 North Branch Chicago River ...................................................................................................12 Mainstem Chicago River .........................................................................................................14 South Branch Chicago River ...................................................................................................20 South Fork of the South Branch Chicago River (Bubbly Creek) ........................................22 Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal ...........................................................................................22 Summit Conduit ..........................................................................................................................31 Calumet Sag Channel ...............................................................................................................32 Little Calumet River ...................................................................................................................40 Current Monitoring Issues for the Chicago Area Waterway System .................................................40 Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting ............................................................................................41 Regional Flooding ...............................................................................................................................41 Power Plant Thermal Load Modeling ..............................................................................................42 Infrastructure Design ........................................................................................................................42 Waterway Separation ........................................................................................................................45 Summary .......................................................................................................................................................46 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................47 Figures 1. Map showing the Chicago Area Waterway System study area, northeastern Illinois .....2 2. Historical engineering drawings of the map, profile, and cross-sections of the Main Drainage Channel for the Chicago Sanitary District of Chicago, from Chicago to Joliet, Illinois ..................................................................................................................................3 3. Map showing the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan service area, Chicago, Illinois ....................4 4. Schematic drawing of the hydrologic cycle ............................................................................5 5. Maps showing A, pre-diversion, and B, post-diversion surface drainage in Chicago, Illinois, and vicinity .......................................................................................................................6 6. Map showing lines of equal precipitation pattern for the 2012 water year, Chicago, Illinois, and vicinity .......................................................................................................................6 7. Schematic cross-section diagram showing the elevations of the water table, local combined sewer invert, and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal water-surface elevation in the Pilsen neighborhood on the south side of Chicago, Illinois. .....................7 iv 8. Map showing the potentiometric surface of the deep sandstone aquifers in the Chicago area, northeastern Illinois, fall 2007 ...........................................................................8 9. Graph showing water-surface profile data for the Chicago Area Waterway System, Chicago, Illinois, and vicinity during an April 17–18, 2013, storm and the extent of drawdown of the water surface at points along the waterway ...........................................9 10. Map showing the Chicago Area Waterway System with the North Shore Channel, Chicago, Illinois, and vicinity ....................................................................................................11 11. Graph showing mean daily discharge for the North Shore Channel at Wilmette, Illinois, for the 2003 water year, which is the last year of record .......................................12 12. Map showing the Chicago Area Waterway System, including the North Branch Chicago River and U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging stations, Chicago, Illinois, and vicinity .....................................................................................................................13 13. Graph showing mean daily discharge for the streamflow-gaging station (05536105) on the North Branch Chicago River at Albany Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, and vicinity, for the 2012 water year ..............................................................................................................14 14. Photograph showing the concrete control structure at the confluence of the North Branch Chicago River and the North Shore Channel, Chicago, Illinois, and vicinity ......15 15. Map showing the Chicago Area Waterway System and the mainstem of the Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois ................................................................................................16 16. Data from acoustic Doppler current profiler measurements in the mainstem of the Chicago River near Columbus Drive in Chicago, Illinois showing: A, typical low-flow water velocity magnitude and B, direction; C, typical high-flow velocity magnitude and D, direction; E, reverse flow magnitude and F, direction ..............................................17 17. Graph showing gage heights for the Chicago River at Columbus Drive at Chicago, Illinois, streamflow-gaging station, hourly precipitation measured at the Chicago Lock, and gate settings at the Chicago River Controlling Works during the April 2013 storm ....................................................................................................................................20 18. Map showing the Chicago Area Waterway System including
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scouts Trail Information
    There may be no better place to bicycle than in Illinois. From flat prairie land, to rolling hills, to towering bluffs, to breathtaking river and lakefront views-- Illinois has it all. If you haven't been on a bicycle lately, you don't know what you are missing. Hop on and take in some of the best scenery Mother Nature has to offer! Illinois is bringing more trails to you. A multi-million dollar initiative approved a few years ago continues to expand existing trails and create new ones. Here are just a few of the numerous opportunities that await you. Included are only those trails that are separated from streets and highways. Enjoy and have a safe trip! Location Length/ Intensity Other Trail and Setting Miles Surface of Use Activities 1 North Branch Bicycle Trail N. Branch Skokie Division Cook Co. FPD 20.1 Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) (Wooded floodplain) skiing 2 Salt Creek Bicycle Trail Bemis Woods to Brookfield Zoo (Wooded 6.6 Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) floodplain) skiing 3 Thorn Creek Bicycle Trail Thorn Creek Division Cook Co. FPD (Wooded 4.8 loop & 3.0 Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) floodplain) linear skiing 4 Busse Woods Bicycle Trail Ned Brown Forest Preserve (Wooded floodplain) 11.2 loop Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) skiing 5 Arie Crown Bicycle Trail Arie Crown Forest Preserve (Wooded floodplain) 3.2 loop Limestone Moderate Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) screenings skiing 6 I & M Canal Bicycle Trail Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Welland Ship Canal and the Men Who Died to Build It
    The Welland Ship Canal and the men who died to build it Friday, August 28, 2015 Lock 1 of the Welland Canal is shown with its gates closed in June 1924, in this photo taken by J. A. McDonald, courtesy of the Welland Ship Canal album, Brock University Archives. The Welland Canal Fallen Workers Memorial is expected to be completed in 2017 and will be located along the canal close to Lock 3. This series of columns complements the work of the task force in bringing the monument to reality, and brings to life the men who were a part of the construction. This memorial will honour the memory of the 137 men who lost their lives in the construction of this major national infrastructure project. The Welland Ship Canal — also known as the fourth and most current Welland Canal — was a major Canadian infrastructure project. With a view to modernizing and making more efficient the previous canal, the construction work, which began in 1913 and would continue until 1935, would have a lasting impact on the local community. This project cut right through the geography of the region and its economic impact would be felt nationally. At its peak, the work engaged 4,000 workers with many thousands more having been employed at different times over the course of the two decades of construction. As we have read in these pages, this great national project was also one of tragedy. A staggering 137 men lost their lives as a result of accidents that occurred during the construction. This number is shockingly high.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Modeling of Chicago Area Waterways System (CAWS)
    CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDIES UIUC-ENG-2014-2016 Hydraulic Engineering Series No 101 ISSN: 0442-1744 Hydraulic Modeling of Chicago Area Waterways System (CAWS) to Assess the Impact of Hydrologic Separation on Water Levels and Potential Flooding during Extreme Rainfall Events in Chicago, Illinois Santiago Santacruz, MSc.1 Marcelo H. Garc´ıa,PhD.2 1Graduate Research Assistant 2Professor and Director, Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory Sponsored by: Under Contract: Great Lakes Commission GLC 2013-06375 Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory Dept. of Civil and Envir. Engineering University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois July 2014 Hydraulic Modeling of Chicago Area Waterways System (CAWS) to Assess the Impact of Hydrologic Separation on Water Levels and Potential Flooding during Extreme Rainfall Events in Chicago, Illinois Santiago Santacruz, MSc.1 Marcelo H. Garc´ıa,PhD.2 1Graduate Research Assistant 2Professor and Director, Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory July 2014 Executive Summary Purpose and Scope In the Chicago Area Waterways (CAWS) drainage area, there are 255 Combined Sewer Outfalls (CSO) owned by the City of Chicago, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRDGC), and surrounding municipalities. Chicago-area CSOs discharging to the CAWS currently drain away from Lake Michigan during most wet weather conditions. Consequently, the majority of CSO events in the Chicago metropolitan area do not affect Lake Michigan. However, the gates at the waterway controlling works that separate the Chicago-area waters and Lake Michigan are opened during certain heavy rainfall events in order to prevent local flooding. At the same time, there is a growing interest in controlling the potential migration of invasive species towards the Great Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Barge Canal” Is No Longer an Accurate Description of the New York State Canals Marine Activity on New York’S Canals
    The Story of the Afterword Today, the name “Barge Canal” is no longer an accurate description of the New York State Canals marine activity on New York’s canals. Trains and trucks have taken over the transport of most cargo that once moved on barges along the canals, but the canals remain a viable waterway for navigation. Now, pleasure boats, tour Historical and Commercial Information boats, cruise ships, canoes and kayaks comprise the majority of vessels that ply the waters of the legendary Erie and the Champlain, Oswego and Cayuga- Seneca canals, which now constitute the 524-mile New York State Canal ROY G. FINCH System. State Engineer and Surveyor While the barges now are few, this network of inland waterways is a popular tourism destination each year for thousands of pleasure boaters as well as visitors by land, who follow the historic trade route that made New York the “Empire State.” Across the canal corridor, dozens of historic sites, museums and community festivals in charming port towns and bustling cities invite visitors to step back in time and re-live the early canal days when “hoggees” guided mule-drawn packet boats along the narrow towpaths. Today, many of the towpaths have been transformed into Canalway Trail segments, extending over 220 miles for the enjoyment of outdoor enthusiasts from near and far who walk, bike and hike through scenic and historic canal areas. In 1992, legislation was enacted in New York State which changed the name of the Barge Canal to the “New York State Canal System” and transferred responsibility for operation and maintenance of the Canal System from the New York State Department of Transportation to the New York State Canal Corporation, a newly created subsidiary of the New York State Thruway Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 FIFA WORLD CUP RUSSIA'n' WATERWAYS
    - The 2018 FIFA World Cup will be the 21st FIFA World Cup, a quadrennial international football tournament contested by the men's national teams of the member associations of FIFA. It is scheduled to take place in Russia from 14 June to 15 July 2018,[2] 2018 FIFA WORLD CUP RUSSIA’n’WATERWAYS after the country was awarded the hosting rights on 2 December 2010. This will be the rst World Cup held in Europe since 2006; all but one of the stadium venues are in European Russia, west of the Ural Mountains to keep travel time manageable. - The nal tournament will involve 32 national teams, which include 31 teams determined through qualifying competitions and Routes from the Five Seas 14 June - 15 July 2018 the automatically quali ed host team. A total of 64 matches will be played in 12 venues located in 11 cities. The nal will take place on 15 July in Moscow at the Luzhniki Stadium. - The general visa policy of Russia will not apply to the World Cup participants and fans, who will be able to visit Russia without a visa right before and during the competition regardless of their citizenship [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_FIFA_World_Cup]. IDWWS SECTION: Rybinsk – Moscow (433 km) Barents Sea WATERWAYS: Volga River, Rybinskoye, Ughlichskoye, Ivan’kovskoye Reservoirs, Moscow Electronic Navigation Charts for Russian Inland Waterways (RIWW) Canal, Ikshinskoye, Pestovskoye, Klyaz’minskoye Reservoirs, Moskva River 600 MOSCOW Luzhniki Arena Stadium (81.000), Spartak Arena Stadium (45.000) White Sea Finland Belomorsk [White Sea] Belomorsk – Petrozavodsk (402 km) Historic towns: Rybinsk, Ughlich, Kimry, Dubna, Dmitrov Baltic Sea Lock 13,2 White Sea – Baltic Canal, Onega Lake Small rivers: Medveditsa, Dubna, Yukhot’, Nerl’, Kimrka, 3 Helsinki 8 4,0 Shosha, Mologa, Sutka 400 402 Arkhangel’sk Towns: Seghezha, Medvezh’yegorsk, Povenets Lock 12,2 Vyborg Lakes: Vygozero, Segozero, Volozero (>60.000 lakes) 4 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 1 2 3 6 7 10 14 15 4,0 MOSCOW, Group stage 1/8 1/4 1/2 3 1 Estonia Petrozavodsk IDWWS SECTION: [Baltic Sea] St.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Scenarios to Meet Dissolved Oxygen Standards in the Chicago Waterway System Yaping Ao Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Master's Theses (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Simulation of Scenarios to Meet Dissolved Oxygen Standards in the Chicago Waterway System Yaping Ao Marquette University Recommended Citation Ao, Yaping, "Simulation of Scenarios to Meet Dissolved Oxygen Standards in the Chicago Waterway System" (2010). Master's Theses (2009 -). Paper 45. http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/45 SIMULATION OF SCENARIOS TO MEET DISSOLVED OXYGEN STANDARDS IN THE CHICAGO WATERWAY SYSTEM by Yaping Ao, B.E. A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of the Master of Science Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2010 ABSTRACT SIMULATION OF SCENARIOS TO MEET DISSOLVED OXYGEN STANDARDS IN THE CHICAGO WATERWAY SYSTEM Yaping Ao, B.E. Marquette University, 2010 Although most reaches of the Chicago Waterway System (CWS) meet the General Use Water Quality Standards a high percentage of the time, dissolved oxygen (DO) standards are not met in the CWS during some periods for both the WYs 2001 and 2003 as representative of wet and dry years. Several methods were used to solve this problem; however, they were inadequate for achieving the proposed DO standards. Therefore, a method of integrating the alternative DO remediation methods into one integrated strategy for improving water quality is considered in this study. The main purpose of this study is the application of the DUFLOW model to improve DO concentrations in the CWS during the WYs 2001 and 2003. Two sets of DO standards needed to be achieved: 90 and 100% compliance with the IEPA’s proposed DO standards, and the MWRDGC’s proposed DO standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13Th) Edition
    Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13th) Edition T OF EN CO M M T M R E A R P C E E D U N A I C T I E R D E S M T A ATES OF U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) RDML Timothy Gallaudet., Ph.D., USN Ret., Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Ocean Service Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management Cover image courtesy of Megan Greenaway—Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI III Preface Distances Between United States Ports is published by the Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), pursuant to the Act of 6 August 1947 (33 U.S.C. 883a and b), and the Act of 22 October 1968 (44 U.S.C. 1310). Distances Between United States Ports contains distances from a port of the United States to other ports in the United States, and from a port in the Great Lakes in the United States to Canadian ports in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. Distances Between Ports, Publication 151, is published by National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and distributed by NOS. NGA Pub. 151 is international in scope and lists distances from foreign port to foreign port and from foreign port to major U.S. ports. The two publications, Distances Between United States Ports and Distances Between Ports, complement each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Report January 2020
    THEMATIC REPORT RIVER-SEA TRANSPORT IN EUROPE PUBLISHED IN JANUARY 2020 Thematic report Published in RIVER-SEA TRANSPORT January 2020 Please find all our data at: www.inland-navigation-market.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 00 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (P.4) METHODOLOGY AND SCOPE OF THE REPORT (P.9) 01 Definitions, terminology and scope of the report (p.10) Methodology and data reporting at EU level (p.11) RIVER-SEA TRANSPORT IN EUROPE: THE CASE OF SEAGOING SHIPS NAVIGATING ON INLAND WATERWAYS (P.15) 02 Overview of river-sea transport in Europe performed by sea- going ships (p.16) Legal and economic aspects related to river-sea transport performed by seagoing ships (p.21) River-sea goods transport in main European Union countries (p.26) • River-sea transport in the United Kingdom (p.26) • River-sea transport in Sweden (p.36) • River-sea transport in Romania (p.41) • River-sea transport in the Netherlands (p.49) • River-sea transport in Belgium (p.55) • River-sea transport in Finland (p.60) • River-sea-transport in Germany (p.67) • River-sea transport in France (p.76) • River-sea transport in Portugal (p.86) River-sea transport outside the European Union (p.87) • River-sea transport in Russia (p.87) • River-sea transport in Ukraine (p.88) RIVER-SEA TRANSPORT IN EUROPE: THE CASE OF INLAND VESSELS NAVIGATING “AT SEA” (P.91) 03 Introduction and general classification rules (p.92) Inland vessels at sea: estuary traffic in Belgium (p.95) Inland vessels put at sea in France (p.98) Inland vessels “at sea”: opportunities for the future? (p.102) 4 CCNR THEMATIC REPORT - RIVER-SEA TRANSPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine (CCNR), in partnership with the European Commission, publishes annual and biannual reports dealing with the European inland navigation market.
    [Show full text]
  • The Montreal/Lake Ontario Section of the Seaway
    THE MONTREAL/LAKE ONTARIO SECTION OF THE SEAWAY he St. Lawrence Seaway, in its broadest of the deep waterway, the St. Lawrence Seaway sense, is a deep waterway extending some proper extends from Montreal to Lake Erie. 3,700 km (2,340 miles) from the Atlantic T The Montreal/Lake Ontario section Ocean to the head of the Great Lakes, at the encompasses a series of 7 locks from Montreal heart of North America. Strictly speaking, how- (Quebec) to Iroquois (Ontario) enabling ships to ever, within the meaning of the legislation which navigate between the lower St. Lawrence River provided for the construction and maintenance and Lake Ontario. Laker under Mercier Bridge 1 HISTORY he opening of the Seaway, in April of 1959, The building of the Erie Canal, in the marked the full realization of a 400 year-old United States, early in the 19th century, provided T dream. In the early part of the 16th century, the incentive for the construction of additional and Jacques Cartier, the French explorer, was turned deeper canals and locks along the St. Lawrence. back by the rushing waters of the Lachine Rapids, The American waterway, which offered a fast, just west of what is now Montreal, and thus denied uninterrupted link between the growing industrial his dream of finding the Northwest Passage and the heartland of North America and the Atlantic Ocean route to the East. At various times during the inter- through New York posed a serious threat to vening 300 years, canals have been dug and locks Canadian shipping and, in particular, to the develop- built around the natural barriers to navigation in the ment of the City of Montreal as a major port.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago
    2010 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO JANUARY 1, 2010 – DECEMBER 31, 2010 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Terrence J O"Brien President Barbara J. McGowan ViCe President Cynthia M. Santos Chslmum of Finance Michael A Alvarez Frank Avila Patricia Horton Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Kathleen Therese Meany Debra Shore 100 EAST ERIE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60611·3154 312.751 .5600 Marryana T Spyropoutos January 1, 2011 To the Citizens of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago: The Minutes for each public meeting contain a record of the action taken on items presented to the Board of Commissioners. The Minutes are compiled annually into the Proceedings of the Board of Commissioners of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (District). Legislative records and related information can be accessed on the District's website at www.mwrd.org. Click on the "Commissioners" tab and then click on "Click here" to access the legislative database. The various tabs provide specific information. The "Legislative" tab provides a search engine to find , view and print detailed legislative records by entering a key word, name or contract number. The "Calendar" tab provides a schedule of all public meetings for the year and the agenda and minute reports for current and past meetings. The "Board of Commissioner" tab provides information on Commissioners, terms of office, and contact information. The "Department" tab provides a list of all Departments, Officers, and their contact information. Public libraries within the District's jurisdiction offer the use of computers with free internet which can be used to access District public information.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Usage of Chicago Area Waterway System
    Industrial Usage of Chicago Area Waterway System DRAFT Final Report March 31, 2015 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary......................................................................1 II. Barge Facilities by Industrial Corridor...........................................7 a. North Branch Industrial Corridor..............................................7 b. Pilsen Industrial Corridor...........................................................9 c. Little Village Industrial Corridor................................................10 d. Calument Industrial Corridor....................................................11 III. The Port of Chicago....................................................................15 IV. Case Studies of Barge Users.......................................................21 a. General Iron..........................................................................21 b. Ozinga...................................................................................22 c. Prairie Material....................... ...............................................23 V. Trends and Forecasts of Industrial Usage of the Chicago Area Waterway.................................................................................29 VI. CAWS Infrastructure Conditions and Needs.......................39 I. Executive Summary ChicagoChica Areago A Waterwaysrea Water wSystemays M Mapap § ¨¦ S 8 3 ¨¦§I94 ¯ 3 5 S ¨ ¦ § l Wilmette Pump Station e n n a h C e r o h S N h North Side WWTP t o r r o t h N B ra nc 90 h, I§¨¦1 Ch ica *#North Branch Pump Station
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Transit Authority (CTA)
    06JN023apr 2006.qxp 6/21/2006 12:37 PM Page 1 All Aboard! Detailed Fare Information First Bus / Last Bus Times All CTA and Pace buses are accessible X to people with disabilities. This map gives detailed information about Chicago Transit # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. Authority bus and elevated/subway train service, and shows Type of Fare* Full Reduced Reduced fares are for: You can use this chart to determine days, hours and frequency of service, and Fare Payment Farareboebox Topop where each route begins and ends. BROADWAY DIVISION ILLINOIS CENTER/NORTH WESTERN EXPRESS Pace suburban bus and Metra commuter train routes in the 36 70 Division/Austin east to Division/Clark 4:50a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 122 CASH FARE Accepted on buses only. $2 $1 Devon/Clark south to Polk/Clark 4:00a-12:10a 4:20a-12:00m 4:20a-12:15a Canal/Washington east to Wacker/Columbus 6:40a-9:15a & CTA service area. It is updated twice a year, and available at CTA Children 7 through 11 BUSES: CarCardsds It shows the first and last buses in each direction on each route, traveling Polk/Clark north to Devon/Clark 4:55a-1:20a 4:55a-1:05a 4:50a-1:15a Division/Clark west to Division/Austin 5:30a-1:20a 5:40a-1:20a 5:45a-1:20a 3:40p-6:10p Exact fare (both coins and bills accepted). No cash transfers available. years old.
    [Show full text]