DOCSLIB.ORG

Hemblington Hall Barns for Mr. & Ms. Burtenshaw Preliminary Ecological

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hemblington Hall Barns for Mr. & Ms. Burtenshaw Preliminary Ecological Hemblington Hall Barns Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Preliminary Ecological Appraisal BROADLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL 2 Feb 2019 20190166 PLANNING CONTROL Hemblington Hall Barns for Mr. & Ms. Burtenshaw 11 June 2018 11 June 2018 1 Hemblington Hall Barns Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Client Hemblington Hall Barns Mr. & Ms. Burtenshaw Hemblington Hall Hemlington Hall Road Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Hemblington Norwich NR13 4EF Planning authority Broadland District Council Thorpe Lodge 1 Yarmouth Road Norwich NR7 0DU Time limit of reliance Please note that the reported surveys were conducted on the date(s) stated in the report and that it represents site conditions at the time of the visit. The findings and recommended mitigation are based on these conditions. If site conditions change materially after the site survey, the original report cannot be relied upon and will need to be updated. Ecological reports can typically be relied on for 18 to 24 months from the date of survey. Document Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Version 1.0 Date 11 June 2018 Author Nathan Duszynski M.Sc, B.Sc (Hons), Grad CIEEM, Natural England licences (Bat survey level 2, Great crested newt level 1) Reviewer Etienne Swarts B. Compt (Hons) F Deg Sc ACIEEM Natural England licences (Bat survey level 2, Great crested newt level 2, Hazel dormouse level 1) Signed disclosure The information, data, advice and opinions provided in this report which I have provided is true and has been prepared in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s Code of Professional Conduct. I confirm that the opinions expressed are my true and professional bona fide opinions. Etienne Swarts, ACIEEM Greenlight Environmental Consultancy Limited Diss Business Hub Hopper Way Diss Norfolk IP22 4GT www.greenlightco.co.uk 11 June 2018 2 Hemblington Hall Barns Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Table of Contents SUMMARY 4 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. METHODOLOGY 6 3. LEGISLATION AND POLICY 11 4. SITE CONTEXT 13 5. DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT 15 6. DESKTOP REVIEW 15 7. FIELD STUDY 18 8. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 40 9. BIBLIOGRAPHY 46 APPENDIX A MAP OF PROTECTED SITES WITHIN 2KM APPENDIX B PROTECTED SITES CITATIONS APPENDIX C LEGISLATION APPENDIX D GREAT CRESTED NEWT HABITAT SUITABILITY INDEX APPENDIX E PLANT SPECIES RECORDED ON SITE APPENDIX F EXAMPLES OF BAT AND BIRD BOXES APPENDIX G EXAMPLES OF HEDGEHOG FRIENDLY FENCING APPENDIX H NATIVE SPECIES SUITABLE FOR PLANTING AND SOWING APPENDIX I PROPOSED PLANS 11 June 2018 3 Hemblington Hall Barns Preliminary Ecological Appraisal SUMMARY • This report considers the ecological aspects relating to a proposed site for development at Hemblington Hall, Hemblington Hall Road, Hemblington, Norwich, Norfolk, NR13 4EF. A preliminary ecological appraisal has been carried out. • The ecology report is required in support of a planning application for the demolition of one barn, and conversion of the remaining structures into residential dwellings and garden storage. • The survey and assessment were completed by independent, qualified and experienced ecologists with Natural England survey licences for the relevant protected species. • The findings of the assessment are that the habitats on the site are of moderate ecological value and that there are no significant ecological constraints that would prevent the proposed works. • Further surveys for bats and great crested newts are required to inform an ecological impact assessment of the site and an appropriate mitigation strategy. • Mitigation and enhancement recommendations for birds and reptiles are outlined below. Protected Recommended mitigation and Status Potential effect habitats/species enhancements Protected sites Two statutory protected No significant impacts None required. sites and six non- are predicted on statutory protected sites protected sites and within 2km. their qualifying features. Protected habitats No priority habitats on Low scale of habitat Mitigation site. loss predicted for Soft landscaping scheme to include the Proposed works involve wildlife. planting of new trees and hedgerows the between plots and around the site, using conversion/demolition native species. of buildings and the Construction work to be carried out in removal of scrub, accordance with BSI (2012), BS 5837:2012, scattered trees and to protect trees and their root protection rubble piles. areas. Bats Low and moderate bat Destruction or Mitigation roosting potential in disturbance of roosts One bat activity survey conducted on buildings one (dairy if present. building one (dairy barn) to determine barn) and two (main Low scale loss and appropriate mitigation strategy. barn) on site. potential light Two bat activity surveys conducted on Negligible bat roosting disturbance of building two (main barn). potential in remaining commuting and Depending on the outcome of the surveys, buildings. foraging habitats on a European Protected Species Mitigation site. Negligible bat roosting Licence might be required. The potential in trees on development is able to accommodate site. mitigation such as a bat loft or new crevice Low value commuting roosting opportunities. and foraging habitat on Lighting schemes should comply with Bat site. Conservation Trust and CIE 150:2003 guidance. 11 June 2018 4 Hemblington Hall Barns Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Protected Recommended mitigation and Status Potential effect habitats/species enhancements Breeding birds Nesting habitats for Low scale loss of Mitigation scrub, tree and building nesting habitat on Works to any scrub, trees and buildings on nesting birds present on site. site to be conducted outside bird nesting site. Potential disturbance season or under watching brief of Blue tit and robin nests to breeding birds. ecologist if during nesting season. found on site. Enhancement Site habitat not suitable Installation of one integrated swift box and for ground nesting birds. one small bird box for every building on Suitable barn owl site, installed on buildings and trees foraging habitat on site. respectively. Installation of one barn owl box erected on a building or tree. Great crested Terrestrial habitats on Potential harm to GCN Mitigation newts the site suitable. if present on site An eDNA survey to be conducted on ponds Four ponds within 250m during works. three and four adjacent the site to of the site, two ponds Loss of GCN terrestrial determine GCN presence/absence and to assessed as average and habitat not considered inform the potential need for further good suitability. Two significant to a local surveys to determine a population class ponds dry. population of GCN, if assessment, and an appropriate mitigation No GCN records within present. strategy. 2km. No impacts on potential GCN aquatic habitat. Water voles, No suitable habitat on No impacts predicted. None required. otters, white- and adjacent the site. clawed crayfish One water vole and 75 otter records within 2km. Reptiles Habitats on site suitable. Reptiles unlikely to be Precautionary mitigation No reptile records found on site and no Cut and maintain vegetation short within 2km. impacts predicted. (maximum height of 10cm) on and around the site until the start of works. Badgers No badger signs on site No impacts predicted. None required. and habitat unsuitable for badger setts. No badger records within 2km. Other animals Numerous solitary bee Potential harm to Mitigation burrows observed animals. Porous hedgehog friendly fencing should within the internal and be used within and around the site. external walls of barns. Solitary bee habitat to be provided, which could comprise an external south or east facing wall of soft red bricks and a prepared wooden artificial structure. Any excavations on the construction site should be covered during the night. Night lighting of the construction site should be minimised as far as possible. Construction materials should be stored off the ground on pallets. 11 June 2018 5 Hemblington Hall Barns Preliminary Ecological Appraisal 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Greenlight Environmental Consultancy Ltd. has been commissioned to carry out a preliminary ecological appraisal of a site for development at Hemblington Hall, Hemblington Hall Road, Hemblington, Norwich, Norfolk, NR13 4EF. The grid reference of the proposed site is TG 35183 11312. 1.2. This report provides an ecological appraisal of the site within the context of the surrounding area. It outlines the habitat features on the site, the likelihood of protected species being present and any potential effects of the proposed development on protected species. 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1. A desktop review of published data, such as records of protected sites and species, OS maps and satellite images has been carried out. A data search was carried out with the Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service (“NBIS”). 2.2. A field survey visit was conducted on 17th May 2018 to confirm the findings of the desktop review and to record habitats and species located on site. Survey conditions were as follows: temperature at 14oC, moderate wind, sunny intervals and dry. The survey was carried out by Etienne Swarts and Nathan Duszynski. 2.3. Equipment available for use during the survey were binoculars, ladders, torches and a digital camera. Bats 2.4. An assessment of the habitats on and surrounding the site for bat interest was made, in accordance with latest bat survey guidelines (Collins, 2016). 2.5. The buildings on site were assessed for their potential to support roosting bats and involved a thorough internal and external
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents
    CONTENTS Acknowledgements Purpose & use of the fen management strategy - explains the role of the strategy and its relationship to other documents Summary - outlines the need for a fen management strategy Introduction - Sets the picture of development and use of fens from their origins to present day Approach to producing strategy - Methodology to writing the fen management strategy Species requirements: This section provides a summary of our existing knowledge concerning birds, plants, mammals and invertebrates associated with the Broads fens. This information forms a basis for the fen management strategy. Vegetation resource Mammals Birds Invertebrates Summary of special features for each valley: This section mainly identifies the botanical features within each valley. The distribution of birds, mammals and invertebrates is either variable or unknown, and so has been covered only in a general sense in the section on species requirements. However, where there is obvious bird interest concentrated within particular valleys, this has been identified. The botanical section provides a summary analysis of the fen vegetation resource survey and considers the relative importance of fen vegetation in a local and national context. A summary of the chemical variables of the soils for each valley has also been included. Ant valley Bure valley Muckfleet valley Thurne valley Waveney valley Yare valley The fen resource for the future: Identifies aims and objectives to restore fens to favourable nature conservation state Environmental constraints and opportunities - Using the fen management strategy: - During the fen vegetation resource survey, chemical variables of the substratum associated with various plant communities were measured. The purpose of these measurements was to provide some indication of the importance of substrate to the plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN April 2018 BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Front cover images (L-R) Marsh Harrier ©Artur Rydzewski; Norfolk Hawker © Milo Bostock; Water Soldier; Water Vole; Berney Marshes ©Mike Page; BIDB Digger BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN FOREWORD This Biodiversity Action Plan (Second Edition) has been prepared by the Broads Internal Drainage Board in accordance with the commitment in the Implementation Plan of the DEFRA Internal Drainage Board Review for IDB’s, to produce their own Biodiversity Action Plans by April 2010. As such, the original version was published in January 2010. This revised version aims to continue to align the Broads IDB with biodiversity policy and more specifically, the Biodiversity document for England, “Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for Englands’ Wildlife and Ecosystem Services” and build on the Government’s 25 Year Environmental Plan; A Green Future. In doing so, the document strives to demonstrate the Board’s commitment to fulfilling its duty as a public body under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 to conserve biodiversity. Many of the Board’s activities have benefits and opportunities for biodiversity, not least its water level management and watercourse maintenance work. It is hoped that this Biodiversity Action Plan will help the Board to maximise the biodiversity benefits from its activities and demonstrate its contribution to the targets as part of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy and achieve wider environmental improvement within its catchments. The Board has adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan as one of its policies and subject to available resources is committed to its implementation. It will review the plan periodically and update it as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan 2018-19 to 9 Subject 2022-23
    Report to Cabinet Item 07 February 2018 Report of Director of regeneration and development Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan 2018-19 to 9 Subject 2022-23 Purpose To consider the Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan 2018-19 to 2022- 23. Recommendations 1. To approve the projects in Norwich to be included in the Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan 2018-19 to 2022-23 with the first year forming the Annual Growth Programme for 2018-19. 2. To recommend the draft of the Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan 2018-19 to 2022-23 to the Greater Norwich Growth Board (GNGB) for approval. Corporate and service priorities The report helps to meet the corporate priority a prosperous and vibrant city. Financial implications The total pooled CIL income for greater Norwich (from Broadland, South Norfolk and the city council) is currently projected to be as follows: INCOME To date 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ Balance 3,396,917 brought forward Actual CIL 3,214,589 receipts Forecast 4,719,530 7,271,195 9,586,646 10,956,189 10,179,162 8,853,709 CIL receipts Cumulative 3,396,917 6,611,506 11,331,035 18,602,230 28,188,876 39,145,265 49,324,427 58,178,136 income The report seeks £1,005,000 from pooled CIL for projects commencing in 2018-19 in Norwich. £55,000 is included in the council’s 5 year capital programme commencing in 2018-19 for the projects to be taken forward by the city council.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Norwich Infrastructure Plan 2021 Size
    Greater Norwich Growth Board Greater Norwich Infrastructure Plan June 2021 Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2 2. Funding sources and delivery planning .......................................................... 8 This section outlines funding and delivery arrangements including the City Deal and the New Anglia LEP Growth Deal. 3. Key Infrastructure ........................................................................................... 13 This section outlines the infrastructure required to support growth. 4. Major Growth Locations ................................................................................. 24 This section identifies where growth is expected to happen in the next few years. 5 Greater Norwich Local Plan ........................................................................... 38 This section outlines the infrastructure required to support growth beyond the adopted plan period, within the Greater Norwich Local Plan. Appendix A – Infrastructure Framework ............................................................... 39 This section lists all the currently planned strategic infrastructure projects. Appendix B Neighbourhood Plans ...................................................................... 85 This section lists all projects identified within agreed neighbourhood plans. 1 1. Introduction 1.1 The Greater Norwich area, covering the districts of Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk, is a key engine of growth for the
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda CABINET
    Agenda CABINET Members of the Portfolio Date Cabinet Monday 7 January 2019 John Fuller The Economy and (Chairman) External Affairs Time Mr M Edney (Vice Growth and Chairman) Resources 9.00 am Mrs Y Bendle Housing, Wellbeing, Leisure and Early Intervention Place Colman and Cavell Rooms Mr K Kiddie Stronger South Norfolk House Communities Cygnet Court Long Stratton Norwich Mrs K Mason Billig Shared Services, Waste and Recycling NR15 2XE Mrs L Neal Regulation and Public Safety Group Meetings Contact Claire White tel (01508) 533669 Conservatives: Cabinet Office 8.00 am South Norfolk District Council Cygnet Court Liberal Democrats: Long Stratton Norwich Blomefield Room 8.15am NR15 2XE Email: [email protected] Website: www.south-norfolk.gov.uk This meeting may be filmed, recorded or photographed by the public; however anyone who wishes to do so must inform the Chairman and ensure it is done in a non-disruptive and public manner. Please review the Council’s guidance on filming and recording meetings available in the meeting room. If you have any special requirements in order to attend this meeting, please let us know in advance Large print version can be made available 1 Agenda 1. To report apologies for absence; 2. Any items of business which the Chairman decides should be considered as a matter of urgency pursuant to Section 100B(4)(b) of the Local Government Act, 1972. Urgent business may only be taken if, "by reason of special circumstances" (which will be recorded in the minutes), the Chairman of the meeting is of the opinion that the item should be considered as a matter of urgency; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Norfolk No Matter What Your Interest: Walking, Cycling, Birdwatching Or Boating, Norfolk Has Something Wonderful for You to Discover and Explore
    Outdoor Norfolk No matter what your interest: walking, cycling, birdwatching or boating, Norfolk has something wonderful for you to discover and explore. Listed here is just a small sample of what’s on offer and where. Go to www.visitnorfolk.co.uk/outdoors for lots more to do and places to stay, fun events and attractions in the driest county in the UK…welcome to Outdoor Norfolk! No Site Contact: Hire Access Café Family House Fishing Nature Widlife Widlife Centre Friendly Garden Reserve Walking Historic Watching Boat/Canoe Horse Riding Horse Cycling/Cycle Peddars Way National Trail www.nationaltrail.co.uk Norfolk Coast Path National Trail www.nationaltrail.co.uk Coasthopper Bus www.coasthopper.co.uk Norfolk Coast Cycleway/Two Rivers Route 30 www.sustrans.org.uk National Cycle Network Routes 1, 11 & 13 www.sustrans.org.uk Long Distance Footpaths www.countrysideaccess.norfolk.gov.uk Tas Valley Walk www.countrysideaccessnorfolk.gov.uk Ketts Country Walk www.countrysideaccessnorfolk.gov.uk Peter Scott Walk www.west-norfolk.gov.uk 1 WWT Welney Wetland Centre 01353 860711 2 Ouse Washes 01354 680212 3 Lakenheath Fen (RSPB) 01842 863400 4 Brandon Country Park 01842 810185 5 High Lodge Forest Centre, Thetford Forest 01842 815434 6 Forest Park Riding & Livery Centre 01842 815517 7 St Helens Picnic Site, Thetford Forest Park 01842 815434 8 Weeting Heath (NWT) 01842 827615 9 Grimes Graves (English Heritage) 01842 810656 10 Lynford Arboretum, Thetford Forest Park 01842 815434 11 Gooderstone Water Gardens 01603 712913 12 Poplar Farm (Natural England)
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Five Year Infrastructure Investment Plan - FINAL
    Greater Norwich Growth Board Joint Five Year Infrastructure Investment Plan - FINAL February 2019 Introduction The projects identified within this Infrastructure Investment Plan are those currently considered to be a priority for delivery to assist in achieving the economic growth targets as set out in the Joint Core Strategy and the Greater Norwich City Deal; one of the key strands of the City Deal was the delivery of an infrastructure programme facilitated by a pooled funding arrangement between the Authorities. Income received from the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is pooled within the Infrastructure Investment Fund (IIF) which is administered by the Greater Norwich Growth Board (GNGB). The projects which receive IIF funding during the forthcoming financial year will be adopted as the 2019/20 Annual Growth Programme (AGP). The projects listed within the subsequent four years are the IIF funding priorities till 2023/24. See Appendix A This Plan incorporates the updated position on infrastructure delivery, includes revised CIL income projections, provides updates on projects accepted within previous AGPs and outlines planned preparatory work for infrastructure schemes for future years. Development of the Joint Five Year Infrastructure Investment Plan Prior to the development of this Plan, the Greater Norwich Infrastructure Plan (GNIP) was updated1. The GNIP identifies infrastructure priorities to the end of the current Joint Core Strategy (2026) and details the progress of infrastructure delivery within the Greater Norwich area. The three District Councils will consider this Plan in January/February 2019. Projects listed within the forthcoming financial year should be considered as the proposed AGP for 2019/20. Thus approval of this plan will commit IIF funding to those projects.
    [Show full text]
  • GREATER NORWICH DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP TECHNICAL CONSULTATION FULL REPORT (Final Draft)
    GREATER NORWICH DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP TECHNICAL CONSULTATION FULL REPORT (Final draft) Prepared for Greater Norwich Development Partnership Thorpe Lodge, Yarmouth Road Thorpe St Andrew Norwich NR7 0DU Prepared by: Michael Mackman BA (Hons), MMRS, FCIM, Chartered Marketer 14 November 2008 Greater Norwich Development Partnership – Joint Core Strategy Consultation P08872 14 November 2008 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Obviously, the evaluation of the comments on the GNDP Regulation 25 consultation is a matter for the Partnership. However, it may be helpful to draw out some common and recurring themes. There are many expressions of concern about the effects of further development on key local infrastructure. These include (but are not exclusively) water and sewerage, health services, transportation/ roads, community facilities and infrastructure, education, policing and the environment (including impacts on SSSIs, nature reserves and green spaces). Many respondents express views to the effect that local resources are at capacity or above, and that further development must bring with it benefits to support new populations, wherever housed. There are particular concerns in some rural communities, although some also welcome controlled development as a means of assuring or enhancing local services, and request a higher development “status” or the development of specific sites. Others are concerned about “knock on” effects on local infrastructure, including roads, local schools and so on. This is coupled with concerns about sustainability, the desirability of “green infrastructure” and about ensuring that new development has the minimum carbon footprint. There are also suggestions about measures to improve the carbon footprint of existing developments, for example, through renewables technology. Unsurprisingly, these concerns are balanced by suggestions from agents, landowners, developers and businesses suggesting the desirability of additional development, or the development of specific sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Minutes, Appendices 1 to 6
    Appendix 1 Growth/Savings Agreed Autumn 2018 Inflation (RPI) 3.00% 2.50% 2.40% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% Cost Detail Class'n Item HOS BH Portfolio Holder 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Comment Centre Code code RECURRING GROWTH/SAVINGS SMMPR 4912 Communications Dept Promotional expenses JFD JFD Communications 11,500 Virement from Tourism HREAD 9394 SNCEA Energy Advice Charges for Services Provided LAB KPP Communities & Housing (1,300) Increase in income from SNC HRHPP 9381 HAPPL Handyperson Plus Handyperson Plus Charges LAB KPP Communities & Housing (5,200) Income budget required HRHPP Handyperson Plus Various LAB KPP Communities & Housing Scheme to be included in base budget funded from savings to capital discretionary grants/loans HSGEN 9011 Homelessness Government Grant LAB LAB Communities & Housing (217,000) Flexible Homelessness Support Grant - offset by reduced management fee HSGEN 4431 Homelessness Self Contained Units LAB LAB Communities & Housing (75,000) Savings due to increased use of PSL properties HSGEN 4416 Homelessness B&B Accommodation LAB LAB Communities & Housing (25,000) Savings due to increased use of PSL properties HSGEN 4760 Homelessness CAB Debt Advice LAB LAB Communities & Housing (13,800) Savings to be used for salary costs of debt management officer HSGEN 4425 Homelessness Removal Costs LAB LAB Communities & Housing (6,300) Savings to be used for salary costs of debt management officer HSGEN 4762 Homelessness Nightstop Plus LAB LAB Communities & Housing (5,000) Reduced demand for service HSGEN 4764 Homelessness Eastern
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan KEY DECISION
    Report to Cabinet Item 12 April 2017 Report of Director of regeneration and development 5 Subject Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan KEY DECISION Purpose To consider the greater Norwich investment plan Recommendations To: 1. Adopt the Annual Growth Programme for 2017-18 (without any provision for maintenance funding); 2. Recognise that sufficient maintenance funding (2016-17 onwards) will be necessary as part of future investment programmes in the Greater Norwich area; and, 3. Recommend the draft greater Norwich investment plan to the greater Norwich growth board (GNGB) for approval. Corporate and service priorities The report helps to meet the corporate priority prosperous city. Financial implications The council agreed in March 2014 to pool CIL income. This excludes the neighbourhood funding and administrative funding elements – which are 20% or 30% of the total depending on whether there is a neighbourhood plan. £191,000 for 2014/15, £841,000 for 2015/16 and £1,490,000 in 2016-17 from the pooled fund has been allocated for projects in Norwich. The total pooled amount for greater Norwich (amount pooled from Broadland, South Norfolk and the city councils) is currently projected to be as follows: INCOME (000) to date 2016-17 2017-18 2016-17 2016-17 2020-21 2021-22 Balance brought forward £3,397 Forecast CIL £4,681 £7,311 £8,118 £8,122 £9,490 £8,588 Cumulative Income £3,397 £8,078 £15,389 £23,507 £31,629 £41,119 £49,707 The report seeks £355,000 for projects in 2017-18 from the pooled funding for projects in Norwich.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Papers
    Council Agenda Date Thursday 21 February 2019 Members of the Council Mrs J Leggett Mrs K A Vincent (Chairman) (Vice Chairman) Time 7.00pm Mr A D Adams Miss T E Lodge Mrs C H Bannock Mr I J Mackie Mr D Buck Mr Andrew M Mallett Mr P H Carrick Mrs T M Mancini-Boyle Place Ms S J Catchpole Mr I N Moncur Council Chamber Mr S M Clancy Mr G K Nurden Mrs J K Copplestone Mr F O'Neill Thorpe Lodge Mr S Dunn Mr G Peck Mr J J Emsell Mr A J Proctor 1 Yarmouth Road Mr G Everett Mr V Ray-Mortlock Thorpe St Andrew Mr J F Fisher Mr S Riley Mr R R Foulger Mrs B H Rix Norwich Mr R F Grady Mr D Roper Mrs S C Gurney Mr N C Shaw Mr C Harrison Mr M D Snowling MBE Contact Mr D G Harrison Mr V B Tapp Mrs L H Hempsall Mr S A Vincent Dawn Matthews tel (01603) 430404 Miss J R Keeler Mr D C Ward Mr R J Knowles Mr J M Ward Broadland District Mr B S Kular Mr F Whymark Council Mr T W Landamore Mr D B Willmott Thorpe Lodge Miss S Lawn Mr S D Woodbridge 1 Yarmouth Road Mr K G Leggett MBE Thorpe St Andrew Norwich NR7 0DU E-mail: [email protected] @BDCDemServices Group meetings: Conservative Group Trafford Room (6.00pm) Liberal Democrat Group John Mack Room (6.00pm) 13 February 2019 The Openness of Local Government Bodies Regulations 2014 Under the above Regulations, any person may take photographs, film and audio-record the proceedings and report on all public meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    rsTPsA W A T o c L S r RELOCATION OF SUFFOLK WATER COMPANY BOREHOLE D SECCOMBE HYDROGEOLOGIST NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY 13 August 1992 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................... 1 2. Description of problem ............................................... 1 3. Licence requirements of new s i t e ..................................... 2 4. Proposed locations ................................................... 3 Dairy Farm, North Lopham ......................................... 3 Lovers Lane, Garboldisham ......................................... 5 Yaxley Crag borehole 3 A 2 ......................................... 7 Cranley borehole 10A ................... .......... ..... 8 5. Catchment water balances ............................................. 9 R. Lt O u s e ........................................................ 9 R. D o v e ............................................................ H 6. Areas of Environmental interest .................................... 12 7. Conclusion............................................................ 14 8. Recommendations..................................................... 15 This book is due for return on or before the last date shown below. Don G>*(1 W*II L»d.. London. N.21 C»l. No. 1208 DG 02342/71 List of Figures Figure 1 - Monthly abstraction data for two boreholes adjacent to Redgrave F e n ........................................................16 Figure 2 - Location for cross-section of R. Lt. O u s e ................. 17 Figure 3 - Geological
    [Show full text]