Multi-Discipline Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Multi-Discipline Review CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 213400Orig1s000 MULTI-DISCIPLINE REVIEW Summary Review Clinical Review Non-Clinical Review Statistical Review Clinical Pharmacology Review NDA/BLA Multi‐disciplinary Review and Evaluation 213400 Tazverik (tazemetostat) NDA/BLA Multi‐Disciplinary Review and Evaluation Application Type New Drug Application (NDA) Application Number(s) 213400 Priority or Standard Priority Submit Date(s) 18 December 2019 Received Date(s) 18 December 2019 PDUFA Goal Date 18 June 2019 Division/Office DHM2/OOD Review Completion Date 16 June 2020 Established/Proper Name Tazemetostat (Proposed) Trade Name Tazverik Pharmacologic Class Methyltransferase inhibitor Code name EPZ‐6438, E7438 Applicant Epizyme, Inc. Dosage form Tablets, 200mg Applicant proposed Dosing 800 mg orally twice daily Regimen Applicant Proposed Indicated for the treatment of patients with relapsed or Indication(s)/Population(s) refractory follicular lymphoma who have received at least two prior therapies Applicant Proposed Follicular Lymphoma SNOMED CT Indication Disease Term for each Proposed Indication Recommendation on Accelerated Approval Regulatory Action Recommended ▪ Adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular Indication(s)/Population(s) lymphoma whose tumors are positive for an EZH2 mutation as (if applicable) detected by an FDA‐approved test and who have received at least 2 prior therapies ▪ Adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options Recommended SNOMED Follicular Lymphoma CT Indication Disease Term for each Indication (if applicable) Recommended Dosing 800 mg orally twice daily Regimen 1 Version date: April 2, 2018 Reference ID: 4626505 NDA/BLA Multi‐disciplinary Review and Evaluation 213400 Tazverik (tazemetostat) Table of Contents Table of Tables ................................................................................................................................ 5 Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 7 Reviewers of Multi‐Disciplinary Review and Evaluation ................................................................ 8 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................... 9 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 11 Product Introduction ...................................................................................................... 11 Conclusions on the Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness ............................................ 11 Benefit‐Risk Assessment ................................................................................................ 14 Patient Experience Data ................................................................................................. 18 2 Therapeutic Context .............................................................................................................. 19 Analysis of Condition ...................................................................................................... 19 Analysis of Current Treatment Options ......................................................................... 21 3 Regulatory Background ......................................................................................................... 31 U.S. Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ............................................................. 31 Summary of Presubmission/Submission Regulatory Activity ........................................ 31 4 Significant Issues from Other Review Disciplines Pertinent to Clinical Conclusions on Efficacy and Safety ................................................................................................................. 34 Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI) .......................................................................... 34 Product Quality .............................................................................................................. 35 Clinical Microbiology ...................................................................................................... 35 Devices and Companion Diagnostic Issues .................................................................... 35 5 Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology................................................................................... 36 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 36 Referenced NDAs, BLAs, DMFs ....................................................................................... 41 Pharmacology ................................................................................................................. 41 ADME/PK ........................................................................................................................ 52 Toxicology ....................................................................................................................... 52 6 Clinical Pharmacology ............................................................................................................ 54 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 54 Summary of Clinical Pharmacology Assessment ............................................................ 54 Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacokinetics ........................................................ 54 General Dosing and Therapeutic Individualization ................................................. 55 Comprehensive Clinical Pharmacology Review ............................................................. 55 2 Version date: April 2, 2018 Reference ID: 4626505 NDA/BLA Multi‐disciplinary Review and Evaluation 213400 Tazverik (tazemetostat) General Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics ................................ 55 Clinical Pharmacology Questions ............................................................................ 59 7 Sources of Clinical Data and Review Strategy ....................................................................... 64 Table of Clinical Studies .................................................................................................. 64 Review Strategy .............................................................................................................. 68 8 Statistical and Clinical and Evaluation ................................................................................... 69 Review of Relevant Individual Trials Used to Support Efficacy ...................................... 69 Study E7438‐G000‐101 – An Open Label, Multicenter, Phase 1/2 Study of E7438 (EZH2 Histone Methyl Transferase (HMT) Inhibitor) as a Single Agent in Subjects with Advanced Solid Tumors or With B cell Lymphomas .................................................................................. 69 Integrated Assessment of Effectiveness ........................................................................ 99 Review of Safety ........................................................................................................... 101 Safety Review Approach ....................................................................................... 101 Review of the Safety Database .................................................................................... 101 Adequacy of Applicant’s Clinical Safety Assessments .......................................... 104 Safety Results ........................................................................................................ 105 Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) Analyses Informing Safety/Tolerability ...... 117 Safety Analyses by Demographic Subgroups ........................................................ 117 Specific Safety Studies/Clinical Trials .................................................................... 118 Additional Safety Explorations .............................................................................. 118 Safety in the Postmarket Setting .......................................................................... 119 Integrated Assessment of Safety ................................................................................. 119 Statistical Issues ........................................................................................................... 121 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................ 121 9 Advisory Committee Meeting and Other External Consultations ....................................... 125 10 Pediatrics ............................................................................................................................. 126 11 Labeling Recommendations ................................................................................................ 127 11.1 Prescription Drug Labeling ....................................................................................... 127 11.2 Patient Labeling ........................................................................................................ 128 12 Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) .............................................................. 129 13 Postmarketing Requirements and Commitment ...............................................................
Recommended publications
  • Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: State- Of-The-Art on Current Therapies and Promises for the Future
    Prime Archives in Cancer Research Book Chapter Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: State- of-the-Art on Current Therapies and Promises for the Future Fabio Nicolini1, Martine Bocchini1, Giuseppe Bronte2, Angelo Delmonte2, Massimo Guidoboni3, Lucio Crinò2 and Massimiliano Mazza1* 1Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Italy 2Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Italy 3Immunotherapy and Cell Therapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Italy *Corresponding Author: Massimiliano Mazza, Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy Published January 11, 2021 This Book Chapter is a republication of an article published by Massimiliano Mazza, et al. at Frontiers in Oncology in January 2020. (Nicolini F, Bocchini M, Bronte G, Delmonte A, Guidoboni M, Crinò L and Mazza M (2020) Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: State-of-the-Art on Current Therapies and Promises for the Future. Front. Oncol. 9:1519. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01519) How to cite this book chapter: Fabio Nicolini, Martine Bocchini, Giuseppe Bronte, Angelo Delmonte, Massimo Guidoboni, Lucio Crinò, Massimiliano Mazza. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: State-of-the-Art on Current Therapies and Promises for the Future. In: Heidari A, editor. Prime Archives in Cancer Research. Hyderabad, India: Vide Leaf. 2021. 1 www.videleaf.com Prime Archives in Cancer Research © The Author(s) 2021. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting EZH2 for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcomas
    Karolak et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:15 Journal of Cancer DOI: 10.20517/2394-4722.2021.05 Metastasis and Treatment Review Open Access Targeting EZH2 for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas Magdalena Karolak1, Ian Tracy1, Janet Shipley2, Zoë S Walters1 1Translational Epigenomics Team, Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. 2Sarcoma Molecular Pathology Team, Divisions of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK. Correspondence to: Zoë S Walters, Translational Epigenomics Team, Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. E-mail: [email protected] How to cite this article: Karolak M, Tracy I, Shipley J, Walters ZS. Targeting EZH2 for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:15. https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2021.05 Received: 7 Jan 2021 First Decision: 2 Feb 2021 Revised: 8 Feb 2021 Accepted: 25 Feb 2021 Available online: 26 Mar 2021 Academic Editor: Ian Judson Copy Editor: Yue-Yue Zhang Production Editor: Yue-Yue Zhang Abstract Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogenous group of rare malignancies of mesenchymal origin, affecting both children and adults. The majority of STS have a poor prognosis and advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. Standard treatments for STS largely constitute tumour resection with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and there has been little significant advancement in the application of novel therapies for treatment of these tumours. The current multimodal approach to therapy often leads to long-term side effects, and for some patients, resistance to cytotoxic agents is associated with local recurrence and/or metastasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Epithelioid Sarcoma—From Genetics to Clinical Practice
    cancers Review Epithelioid Sarcoma—From Genetics to Clinical Practice Anna M. Czarnecka 1,2,* , Pawel Sobczuk 1,3,* , Michal Kostrzanowski 1,4 , Mateusz Spalek 1 , Marzanna Chojnacka 5, Anna Szumera-Cieckiewicz 6,7 and Piotr Rutkowski 1 1 Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] (M.K.); [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (P.R.) 2 Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland 3 Department of Experimental and Clinical Physiology, Laboratory of Centre for Preclinical Research, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland 4 Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland 5 Department of Radiotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 6 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 7 Department of Diagnostic Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.M.C.); [email protected] (P.S.) Received: 29 June 2020; Accepted: 24 July 2020; Published: 29 July 2020 Abstract: Epithelioid sarcoma is a mesenchymal soft tissue sarcoma often arising in the extremities, usually in young adults with a pick of incidence at 35 years of age. Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is characterized by the loss of SMARCB1/INI1 (integrase interactor 1) or other proteins of the SWI/SNF complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of the Tree-Based Scan Statistic for Surveillance of Infant Outcomes Following Maternal Perinatal Medication Use Appendices: Code Lists
    Use of the Tree-Based Scan Statistic for Surveillance of Infant Outcomes Following Maternal Perinatal Medication Use Appendices: Code Lists Elizabeth A Suarez1, Michael Nguyen2, Di Zhang3, Yueqin Zhao3, Danijela Stojanovic2, Monica Munoz4, Jane Liedtka5, Abby Anderson6, Wei Liu7, Steven Bird7, Inna Dashevsky1, David Cole1, Sandra DeLuccia1, Talia Menzin1, Jennifer Noble1, Judith C Maro1 1. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; 2. Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; 3. Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, MD; 4. Division of Pharmacovigilance, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; 5. Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health, Center for Drug and Evaluation Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; 6. Division of Bone, Reproductive, and Urologic Products, Center for Drug and Evaluation Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; 7. Division of Epidemiology, Center for Drug and Evaluation Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD February 9, 2021 The Sentinel System is sponsored by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to proactively monitor the safety of FDA-regulated medical products and complements other existing FDA safety surveillance capabilities. The Sentinel System is one piece of FDA’s Sentinel Initiative, a long-term, multi-faceted effort to develop a national electronic system. Sentinel Collaborators include Data and Academic Partners that provide access to healthcare data and ongoing scientific, technical, methodological, and organizational expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Tazemetostat (Tazverik™) EOCCO POLICY
    tazemetostat (Tazverik™) EOCCO POLICY Policy Type: PA/SP Pharmacy Coverage Policy: EOCCO184 Description Tazemetostat (Tazverik) is an orally administered inhibitor of methyltransferase, EZH2. Length of Authorization N/A Quantity Limits Product Name Dosage Form Indication Quantity Limit Epithelioid sarcoma, advanced or metastatic, not eligible for resection; Follicular lymphoma, relapsed or refractory, tazemetostat EZH2 mutation-positive, in 200 mg tablets 240 tablets/30 days (Tazverik) that that have received at least two therapies; Follicular lymphoma, relapsed or refractory, in those with no satisfactory alternative therapy Initial Evaluation I. Tazemetostat (Tazverik) is considered investigational when used for all conditions, including but not limited to: A. Epithelioid sarcoma B. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including follicular lymphoma Renewal Evaluation I. N/A 1 tazemetostat (Tazverik™) EOCCO POLICY Supporting Evidence I. Background: Epithelioid sarcoma is a very rare cancer of the soft tissue, generally seen in younger populations (average age of 27). This aggressive condition is known for recurrence, spread to locoregional lymph nodes, and eventually distant metastases. Common sites of origin include fingers, hands, forearms, feet, and other limbs. First-line management is typically surgery, with local recurrence necessitating amputation in many cases. Although, not specifically FDA-approved for epithelioid sarcoma, there are several systemic therapies used in the metastatic setting. Often, anthracycline based regimens (e.g., doxorubicin with or without ifosfamide), gemcitabine, pazopanib (Votrient), doxetaxel, sunitinib (Sutent), dacarbazine, epirubicin, and temozolomide. II. Efficacy: Tazemetostat (Tazverik) was approved on data from a Phase 2 trial. Pooled data from two cohorts, five and six (n=62, n=44), were used to support the approval. Seventy-seven percent of patients had prior surgery and 61% had prior chemotherapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Tissue Sarcoma: an Insight on Biomarkers at Molecular, Metabolic and Cellular Level
    cancers Review Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Insight on Biomarkers at Molecular, Metabolic and Cellular Level Serena Pillozzi 1,* , Andrea Bernini 2, Ilaria Palchetti 3 , Olivia Crociani 4, Lorenzo Antonuzzo 1,4, Domenico Campanacci 5 and Guido Scoccianti 6 1 Medical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; lorenzo.antonuzzo@unifi.it 2 Department of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, Via Aldo Moro 2, 53100 Siena, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Chemistry Ugo Schiff, University of Florence, Via della Lastruccia 3, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; ilaria.palchetti@unifi.it 4 Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; olivia.crociani@unifi.it 5 Department of Health Science, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; domenicoandrea.campanacci@unifi.it 6 Department of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Florence, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: serena.pillozzi@unifi.it Simple Summary: Soft tissue sarcoma is a rare mesenchymal malignancy. Despite the advancements in the fields of radiology, pathology and surgery, these tumors often recur locally and/or with metastatic disease. STS is considered to be a diagnostic challenge due to the large variety of histologi- Citation: Pillozzi, S.; Bernini, A.; cal subtypes with clinical and histopathological characteristics which are not always distinct. One of Palchetti, I.; Crociani, O.; Antonuzzo, the important clinical problems is a lack of useful biomarkers. Therefore, the discovery of biomarkers L.; Campanacci, D.; Scoccianti, G. Soft that can be used to detect tumors or predict tumor response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy could Tissue Sarcoma: An Insight on help clinicians provide more effective clinical management.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetic Regulation of EMT (Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition) and Tumor Aggressiveness: a View on Paradoxical Roles of KDM6B and EZH2
    epigenomes Review Epigenetic Regulation of EMT (Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition) and Tumor Aggressiveness: A View on Paradoxical Roles of KDM6B and EZH2 Camille Lachat 1, Michaël Boyer-Guittaut 1,2, Paul Peixoto 1,3,† and Eric Hervouet 1,2,3,†,* 1 Interactions Hôte-Greffon-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-25000 Besançon, France; [email protected] (C.L.); [email protected] (M.B.-G.); [email protected] (P.P.) 2 DImaCell Platform, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-25000 Besançon, France 3 EPIGENEXP Platform, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-25000 Besançon, France * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-81666542 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 3 December 2018; Accepted: 17 December 2018; Published: 20 December 2018 Abstract: EMT (epithelial to mesenchymal transition) is a plastic phenomenon involved in metastasis formation. Its plasticity is conferred in a great part by its epigenetic regulation. It has been reported that the trimethylation of lysine 27 histone H3 (H3K27me3) was a master regulator of EMT through two antagonist enzymes that regulate this mark, the methyltransferase EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2) and the lysine demethylase KDM6B (lysine femethylase 6B). Here we report that EZH2 and KDM6B are overexpressed in numerous cancers and involved in the aggressive phenotype and EMT in various cell lines by regulating a specific subset of genes. The first paradoxical role of these enzymes is that they are antagonistic, but both involved in cancer aggressiveness and EMT. The second paradoxical role of EZH2 and KDM6B during EMT and cancer aggressiveness is that they are also inactivated or under-expressed in some cancer types and linked to epithelial phenotypes in other cancer cell lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Epigenetics in Sarcomas Through EZH2 Inhibition Antoine Italiano1,2,3
    Italiano Journal of Hematology & Oncology (2020) 13:33 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-00868-4 EDITORIAL Open Access Targeting epigenetics in sarcomas through EZH2 inhibition Antoine Italiano1,2,3 Abstract Soft-tissue sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of diseases with distinct genetic and clinical features accounting for up to 1% of cancer in adults and 15% of cancer in children. Epithelioid sarcoma is an extremely rare and aggressive tumor affecting young adults that is characterized by loss of INI1 expression. INI1 (SMARCB1, SNF5, BAF47) is a subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex that opposes the enzymatic function of EZH2. When INI1 loses its regulatory function, EZH2 activity is de-regulated, allowing EZH2 to play a driving, oncogenic role. Tazemetostat, a specific EZH2 inhibitor, has just been approved for patients with advanced epithelioid sarcoma and represents a new therapeutic option in this devastating disease. Over the past three decades, outcomes of therapy have STS will develop metastatic disease. Once metastases are improved considerably for a wide range of cancers. For detected, the treatment is mainly based on palliative example, the discovery of new chemotherapeutic agents chemotherapy. Since its approval in 1974, doxorubicin and the optimization of multimodality therapies have remains nowadays the first-line standard of care and the improved the cure rate for pediatric cancers from less median survival of patients in this setting ranges be- than 10% in the 1950s to over 80% today; similarly, the tween 12 and 20 months [2]. Therefore, it is generally 5-year survival rate of testicular and breast cancer im- acknowledged that the benefits from chemotherapy in proved from 57% and 60% in the 1950s to over 96% and these diseases have reached a plateau and that new 90%, respectively, today.
    [Show full text]
  • TAZVERIK (Tazemetostat) Tablets, for Oral Use Patients Long-Term for the Development of Secondary Malignancies
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION These highlights do not include all the information needed to use ----------------------- WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ---------------------­ TAZVERIK™ safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for • Secondary Malignancies: TAZVERIK increases the risk of developing TAZVERIK. secondary malignancies, including T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma, myelodysplastic syndrome, and acute myeloid leukemia. Monitor TAZVERIK (tazemetostat) tablets, for oral use patients long-term for the development of secondary malignancies. (5.1) Initial U.S. Approval: 2020 • Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: Can cause fetal harm. Advise patients of potential risk to a fetus and to use effective non-hormonal contraception. -------------------------- RECENT MAJOR CHANGES -------------------------­ (5.2) Indications and Usage, relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (1.2) 06/2020 ------------------------------ ADVERSE REACTIONS ----------------------------­ Dosage and Administration, Patient Selection (2.1) 06/2020 • The most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in patients with epithelioid sarcoma are pain, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, vomiting, and --------------------------- INDICATIONS AND USAGE -------------------------­ constipation. (6.1) TAZVERIK is a methyltransferase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of: • The most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in patients with follicular • Adults and pediatric patients aged 16 years and older with metastatic or lymphoma are fatigue, upper respiratory tract infection, musculoskeletal locally advanced epithelioid sarcoma not eligible for complete resection. pain, nausea, and abdominal pain. (6.1) (1.1) • Adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma whose To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Epizyme at tumors are positive for an EZH2 mutation as detected by an 1-866-4EPZMED or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch. FDA-approved test and who have received at least 2 prior systemic therapies.
    [Show full text]
  • Tazemetostat in Treating Patients with Relapsed Or Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Or Histiocytic Disord
    Tazemetostat in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, or Histiocytic Disorders With EZH2, SMARCB1, or SMARCA4 Gene Mutations (A Pediatric MATCH Treatment Trial) Status: Completed Eligibility Criteria Sex: All Age: 12 Months to 21 Years old This study is NOT accepting healthy volunteers Inclusion Criteria: • Patient must have enrolled onto APEC1621SC and must have been given a treatment assignment to Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) to APEC1621C based on the presence of an actionable mutation • Patients must have radiographically measurable disease at the time of study enrollment; patients with neuroblastoma who do not have measurable disease but have MIBG+ evaluable disease are eligible; measurable disease in patients with CNS involvement is defined as tumor that is measurable in two perpendicular diameters on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and visible on more than one slice; Note: The following do not qualify as measurable disease: • Malignant fluid collections (e.g., ascites, pleural effusions) • Bone marrow infiltration except that detected by MIBG scan for neuroblastoma • Lesions only detected by nuclear medicine studies (e.g., bone, gallium or positron emission tomography [PET] scans) except as noted for neuroblastoma • Elevated tumor markers in plasma or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) • Previously radiated lesions that have not demonstrated clear progression post radiation • Leptomeningeal lesions that do not meet the measurement requirements for Response Evaluation Criteria
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q ☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2019 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-35945 EPIZYME, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 26-1349956 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 400 Technology Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) 617-229-5872 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common stock, $0.0001 par value EPZM Nasdaq Global Select Market The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of October 25, 2019: 91,073,942 shares. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
    [Show full text]
  • View Presentation
    The Next EPIsode: Rewriting Oncology Treatment with Epigenetics NASDAQ: EPZM Robert Bazemore, President & CEO 1 Robert Bazemore President & CEO 2 Epizyme 2021 & Beyond: Strategic Priorities 3 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Any statements in this presentation about future expectations, whether the company will receive regulatory approvals, including plans and prospects for Epizyme, Inc. and other statements accelerated approval, to conduct trials or to market products; the containing the words “anticipate," “believe,” “estimate,” impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the company’s business, “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “target,” results of operations and financial condition; whether the company's “potential,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “continue,” and cash resources will be sufficient to fund the company’s foreseeable similar expressions, constitute forward-looking statements within the and unforeseeable operating expenses and capital expenditure meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. requirements; other matters that could affect the availability or Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by such commercial success of tazemetostat; and other factors discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, the “Risk Factors” section of the company’s most recent Form 10-K including: whether commercial sales of TAZVERIK for epithelioid or Form 10-Q filed with the SEC and in the company's other filings sarcoma and follicular lymphoma in the approved
    [Show full text]