DOCSLIB.ORG

Executions, the Public and the Press in Nineteenth Century New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Executions, the Public and the Press in Nineteenth Century New York Buffalo Law Review Volume 43 Number 2 Article 3 10-1-1995 Forbidden Spectacle: Executions, the Public and the Press in Nineteenth Century New York Michael Madow Brooklyn Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Michael Madow, Forbidden Spectacle: Executions, the Public and the Press in Nineteenth Century New York, 43 Buff. L. Rev. 461 (1995). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol43/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Forbidden Spectacle: Executions, the Public and the Press in Nineteenth Century New York MICHAEL MADOWt CONTENTS Introduction ..................................... 462 I. The Modernization of Execution Practice in Nineteenth Century New York: An Overview ....... 469 A. Capital Punishment in New York: 1825 and 1892 469 B. A Comparative Analysis of "Traditional" and "Modern" Execution Practice ................ 476 1. Privatization ............................. 476 2. Rationalization ........................... 479 3. M edicalization ........................... 486 I1. The Abolition of Public Executions in Antebellum New Y ork ....................................... 490 A. The Decline of Public Punishments: The Contemporary Historiographic Debate ......... 491 B. The Social and Cultural Origins of Privatization 498 C. The Resilience of Hanging Day: Popular Resistance to Legislative Reform .............. 503 D. The End of Hanging Day?: The Act of 1835 ... 506 Il. "Private" Executions in New York: 1835-1888 ...... 511 A. Reconstituting the Execution Audience ........ 512 1. Public Access to Executions after 1835 ..... 512 2. Size and Composition of the Official Execution Audience ...................... 514 3. Press Access to "Private" Executions ...... 519 B. The (Slow) Decline of Hanging Day Ritual ..... 523 t Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School. B.A., 1971, Amherst College; M.A., 1978, Harvard University;, J.D., 1982, Columbia University. I owe thanks to C. Edwin Baker, Ur- sula Bentele, Deborah Denno, Paul Finkelman, Susan Herman, Beryl Jones, Gary Minda, and David Papke for their helpful comments on drafts of this Article. Andrea Hecht, Eric Wertzer, and especially Lorca Morello provided excellent research assistance. The generous financial support of the Brooklyn Law School Summer Research Fund is gratefully acknowledged. BUFFALO LAW REVIEW [Vol. 43 C. The End of the Rope: The Electrical Execution Act of 1888 ................................. 530 IV. Electrocution, the Public and the Press ............ 538 A. The Anti-Publicity Provisions of the Electrical Execution Act ............................... 538 1. Execution Site ........................... 539 2. Visitation ............................... 539 3. Execution Audience ...................... 539 4. Disposition of the Corpse ................. 540 5. Restrictions on the Press ................. 541 B. The "Gag Law": Defiance, Debate, and Repeal. 542 V. Conclusion ...................................... 556 Our courts of justice must be open to the public; the deliberations of our legislature must be public; not even a poor freemasonry society is to be tol- erated because its ceremonies are secret; but when life is to be taken, when a human being is to be smitten down like an ox, when a soul is to be vio- lently hurled into eternity, the most solemn occasion that can be witnessed on earth, then the public must be excluded. But the American people will not long submit to this.' [Clapital punishment remains fundamentally, even today, a spectacle that must actually be forbidden.2 INTRODUCTION Executions in America today are semi-covert events-closed to the general public, yet not altogether secret. In some states, the law expressly requires the inclusion of reporters among the official witnesses. In most others, press representatives routinely attend executions as a matter of administrative custom. Nowhere, how- ever, may a reporter bring a camera or tape recorder with her into the death chamber. As a result, the little knowledge most of us have about how the State "does death" comes in "the most highly mediated way"-"as a rumor, a report, an account of the voiceless expression of the body of the condemned."3 Should we know more? Should ordinary citizens reclaim their traditional place in the execution audience-today as television viewers, rather than scaffold crowd? Would television have any im- 1. REv. THoMAS UPHAM, THE MANUAL OF PEACE 15 (1836) quoted in Loues P. MAsuR, RrrEs OF ExEcUTIoN: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AumcCAN CULTURE 1776-1835, 110 (1989). 2. MIcHEL FOUCAULT, DiscnuLE AND PUNISH: THE BrTH OF THE PRISON 15 (Alan Sheri- dan trans., 1977) (1975). 3. Austin Sarat, Speaking of Death: Narratives of Violence in Capital Trials, 27 LAw & Soc'y REv. 19, 52 (1993). 1995] EXECUTIONS, THE PUBLIC AND THE PRESS 463 pact on how executions are conducted or on what the public thinks of them? Would anybody want to watch? Could anybody bear to watch? These questions have taken on urgency of late, as television broadcasters-both the high-minded and the ratings- driven-agitate and litigate for access to America's death chambers. This controversy began in earnest in 1991, when San Francisco public television station KQED was denied permission to video- tape the execution of Robert Alton Harris in San Quentin's gas chamber.4 Three years later, talk-show host Phil Donahue was re- fused permission to videotape the electrocution of David Lawson in North Carolina. In each case, the courts held that the Warden's exclusion of television cameras from the death chamber did not violate the First Amendment.' These events, in turn, have gener- ated a broad and spirited debate among legislators,7 members of the bar," editorialists,' pundits,10 and legal scholars,11 about the 4. Harris had previously given KQED his consent to the videotaping. KQED's stated intention was to include footage of the Harris execution in a comprehensive documentary about the death penalty. See William Bennett Turner & Beth S. Brinkmnan, Televising Ex- ecutions: The First Amendment Issues, 32 SANTA CLARA L. Rzv. 1135, 1135-38 (1992); Ron LaBrecque, Stay Tuned for the Execution of Robert Harris, 13 WASH. JOURNALISM REv. 34 (1991). 5. See, e.g., Bruce Nolan, Debate Rages Over Airing of Execution, TmsS-PicAyuNE, May 22, 1994, at Al; Robert P. Laurence, DonahueBelieves in Spectacle of Execution, SAN DiEGO UNION-THm., May 23, 1994, at El0; Walter Goodman, Viewing an Execution from the Sofa, N.Y. TIMES, June 13, 1994, at C15. As in the KQED case, the condemned man (Lawson) had consented to the videotaping. Indeed, he originated the idea, and joined with Donahue in the lawsuit against the prison warden. See Bernard Schwartz, Death T.V.? Is There a Press Right of Access to News That Allows Television of Executions?, 30 TULSA L. REv. 305, 305-06 (1994). 6. See KQED v. Vasquez, No. C 90-1383, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21163 (N.D. Cal. 1991); Lawson v. Dixon, No. 198P94-2, 1994 N.C. LEXIS 314 (N.C. 1994) (denying plain- tiff's petition for rehearing). A detailed account of the KQED litigation can be found in Turner & Brinkman, supra note 4. The KQED case was not the first constitutional chal- lenge to a prohibition on television cameras at executions. See Garrett v. Estelle, 556 F.2d 1274 (5th Cir. 1977); Halquist v. Department of Corrections, 783 P.2d 1065 (Wash. 1989). 7. See, e.g., Jim Shumaker, Hang 'Em High, CHARLOTTE OBSERvER, March 6, 1994, at 9. 8. See, e.g., Naftali Bendavid, As Viewers Tune to 'Cops' and 'Most Wanted', Is Death TV Next?, REcoRDER, May 31, 1994, at 1; Karl Olson & Erin Daly, TV Station Fights to Show Execution, CONN. L. TPm., Feb. 18, 1991, at 16; Victoria Slind-Flor, Film at 11? Law- yers Debate TV Executions, NAV'L L. J., June 10, 1991, at 8; Gerald F. Uelman, State-Made Snuff Films, N.J. L. J., April 12, 1990, at 9. In July, 1992, the Young Lawyers Division of the ABA recommended to the House of Delegates that the ABA adopt a position opposing the enactment of any legislation that "would allow audio or video broadcasts, live or delayed, of the execution of individuals sentenced to death." See Pamela J. Roberts, Report to the House of Delegates, A.B.A. YOUNG LAW. DIVISION 124A (1992). This recommendation was strenuously opposed by the National Conference of Lawyers and Representatives of the Media. See Letter from Murray Richtel and J. Laurent Scharff, Co-chairs, National Confer- ence of Lawyers and Representatives of the Media, to Pamela Roberts, Chair of the A.B.A. BUFFALO LAW REVIEW [Vol. 43 practical wisdom and moral legitimacy of concealing executions from public view. Many of those opposed to televised executions invoke the his- tory of public executions to buttress their case. A televised execu- tion, it is said, would be a lamentable regression to a less "civi- lized" and less "humane" mode of capital punishment. Public executions, we are told, were repudiated long ago because they came to be seen for what they were - barbaric and indecent spec- tacles that degraded and brutalized the condemned and the spec- tators alike. Large crowds of people - men, women, even children - gathered at the scaffold to cheer and leer, joke and laugh, drink and brawl. Do we really want to "go back" to that? Anthony Lewis, for example, recalls Charles Dickens' description of the cal- lousness and unseemly levity - Dickens called it the "brutal mirth" - of the London crowd at the public hanging of the Man- nings in 1849, and warns that if executions are televised people will "invite friends over for beer, pretzels, and death. '12 A law school Young Lawyers Division (July 14, 1992) (on file with author).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DATES of TRIALS Until October 1775, and Again from December 1816
    DATES OF TRIALS Until October 1775, and again from December 1816, the printed Proceedings provide both the start and the end dates of each sessions. Until the 1750s, both the Gentleman’s and (especially) the London Magazine scrupulously noted the end dates of sessions, dates of subsequent Recorder’s Reports, and days of execution. From December 1775 to October 1816, I have derived the end dates of each sessions from newspaper accounts of the trials. Trials at the Old Bailey usually began on a Wednesday. And, of course, no trials were held on Sundays. ***** NAMES & ALIASES I have silently corrected obvious misspellings in the Proceedings (as will be apparent to users who hyper-link through to the trial account at the OBPO), particularly where those misspellings are confirmed in supporting documents. I have also regularized spellings where there may be inconsistencies at different appearances points in the OBPO. In instances where I have made a more radical change in the convict’s name, I have provided a documentary reference to justify the more marked discrepancy between the name used here and that which appears in the Proceedings. ***** AGE The printed Proceedings almost invariably provide the age of each Old Bailey convict from December 1790 onwards. From 1791 onwards, the Home Office’s “Criminal Registers” for London and Middlesex (HO 26) do so as well. However, no volumes in this series exist for 1799 and 1800, and those for 1828-33 inclusive (HO 26/35-39) omit the ages of the convicts. I have not comprehensively compared the ages reported in HO 26 with those given in the Proceedings, and it is not impossible that there are discrepancies between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTING EXECUTIONS and PARDONS at the OLD BAILEY, 1730-1837 Simon Devereaux1
    Law, Crime and History (2016) 1 THE BLOODIEST CODE: COUNTING EXECUTIONS AND PARDONS AT THE OLD BAILEY, 1730-1837 Simon Devereaux1 Abstract This article presents the most detailed and accurate accounting to date of capital convicts at the Old Bailey during the era of England’s ‘Bloody Code’ (1730-1837), at which time that court produced more capital convictions and executions than any other jurisdiction in the western world. It notes and explains some limitations of the two most authoritative sources for the statistics of capital punishment at the Old Bailey currently available: the published trial Proceedings of the court; and the statistical returns presented to Parliament from 1818 onwards. And it reviews the sorts of criteria that need to be considered in determining how a more complete accounting of all those condemned and executed might be achieved. Keywords: Capital punishment; Old Bailey; ‘Bloody Code’ Introduction This article introduces and explains the most extensive and accurate accounting of execution and pardon at the Old Bailey that has yet been attempted. It is derived from a new web-based dataset whose aim is to provide – and to make searchable – all of the relevant and recoverable details (with documentary references) pertaining to the 9,474 men, women and (sometimes) children who were capitally convicted at London’s Old Bailey courthouse from 1730 to 1837.2 The Old Bailey (more properly known to contemporaries as the ‘Sessions House’) was the largest single criminal jurisdiction in eighteenth century Europe, the population of London having surpassed that of its principal continental rival Paris no later than 1700.3 Even so, until the last three years examined here, the Old Bailey did not embrace the entire metropolitan conurbation.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITAL PUNISHMENT in EARLY AMERICA, 1750-1800 by Gabriele
    THEATER OF DEATH: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN EARLY AMERICA, 1750-1800 by Gabriele Gottlieb Equivalent of B.A., Augsburg University, Germany, 1995 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 1998 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Pittsburgh in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2005 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Gabriele Gottlieb It was defended on 12/07/2005 and approved by Seymour Drescher, University Professor, Department of History Van Beck Hall, Associate Professor, Department of History Wendy Goldman, Full Professor, Department of History, CMU Dissertation Advisor: Marcus Rediker, Full Professor, Department of History ii Copyright © by Gabriele Gottlieb 2005 iii Theater of Death: Capital Punishment in Early America, 1750-1800 Gabriele Gottlieb, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2005 This dissertation analyzes capital punishment from 1750 to 1800 in Boston, Philadelphia, and Charleston. All were important Atlantic ports with bustling waterfront and diverse populations. Capital punishment was an integral part of eighteenth-century city life with the execution day as its pinnacle. As hangings were public and often attended by thousands of people, civil and religious authorities used the high drama of the gallows to build community consensus, shape the social order, and legitimize their power. A quantitative analysis of executions reveals patterns of punishment over time. The number of executions was relatively low in the colonial period, varied greatly during the Revolution, rose sharply in the mid- to late-1780s, and then declined during the 1790s in Boston and Philadelphia but remained high in Charleston.
    [Show full text]
  • Hangmen, Headsmen, and Other Fun Ways to Die
    Hangmen, Headsmen, and other Fun Ways to Die By: THL Beatrice de Winter This class will focus on a discussion of capital punishment in period. In particular, we will focus on hangings and beheadings, as well as the hangmen and headsmen who performed them, but we will also discuss a few more unusual forms of capital punishment. I. Well-known Forms of Capital Punishment a. Hanging b. Beheading c. Gibbeting d. Drowning e. Boiling f. Burning II. Early History of Capital Punishment a. See chart on page 3. III. Ways to Escape Death a. Benefit of clergy b. Royal pardon c. Begging for a husband IV. Hanging a. Evolution of hanging i. Primitive gallows ii. Cart substitution iii. Knot placement change iv. Drop length b. Location of hangings i. The Elms ii. Discussion of Tyburn 1. Traveling to the gallows at Tyburn 2. “Triple Tree” c. Reasons to attend a hanging i. Entertainment ii. Prevent dissection iii. Prevent burial after ineffective hanging/resuscitation iv. Obtain a cure 1 | P a g e v. Instructional purposes d. Famous hangmen e. About hangmen i. Who were the hangmen? ii. Attitudes about hangmen iii. London vs. Scotland V. Beheading a. Executioner’s Axe i. Dimensions ii. Materials iii. Practice/protocols iv. Location of use b. Executioner’s Sword i. Dimensions ii. Materials iii. Practice/protocols iv. Location of use c. Famous people who were beheaded d. Halifax Gibbet i. Dimensions ii. Materials e. Scottish Maiden i. Dimensions ii. Materials VI. Gibbeting VII. Drowning and Boiling VIII. Burning 2 | P a g e Early History of Capital Punishment Date Practitioner Reason Method Notes 2070 BC - 1600 BC Ancient China Five Punishments of the Xia Dynasty Beheading 500 offenses punishable First code of law ever established, which 1750 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death Penalty in Decline: from Colonial America to the Present John D
    University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 2014 Foreword: The eD ath Penalty in Decline: From Colonial America to the Present John Bessler University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Foreword: The eD ath Penalty in Decline: From Colonial America to the Present, 50 Crim. L. Bull. 245 (2014) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RIMI AL LAW BULLETIN Volume 50, Number 2 FOREWORD THE DEATH PE~ALTY IN DECLINE: FROM COLONIAL AMERICA TO THE PRESENT John D. Bessler Foreword The Death Penalty in Decline: From Colonial America to the Present John D. Bessler" In colonial America, corporal punishments-both lethal and non­ lethal-were a gritty reality of life. The Massachusetts "Body of Uber­ ties," adopted in 1641, contained twelve capital offenses and authorized the imposition of up to forty lashes. Everything from murder and rebellion, to adultery and bestiality, to blasphemy and witchcraft were punishable by death, with eleven of the twelve offenses-as
    [Show full text]
  • The Gibbet in the Landscape: Locating the Criminal Corpse in Mid-Eighteenth-Century England Zoe Dyndor
    OPEN 3 The Gibbet in the Landscape: Locating the Criminal Corpse in Mid-Eighteenth-Century England Zoe Dyndor In the late 1740s a group of smugglers known as the Hawkhurst gang committed a number of violent crimes that included several brutal murders. At least 75 of the gang were subsequently hung or transported for smuggling, robbery and murder. Of those in receipt of the death sentence, 14 were subjected to the further punishment of hanging in chains (or gibbeting), thereby inflicting further ignominy on the offenders.1 Hanging in chains was usually reserved for murderers, and occasionally mail robbers. However, between 1747 and 1750 members of the Hawkhurst gang were also gibbeted for crimes including smug- gling and robbery. Gibbeting was an infrequently used punishment, but the violent circumstances of the Hawkhurst gang’s crimes coupled with the authorities’ desire to punish smugglers on the south coast led to the large number of gibbetings, and consequently a peak in the use of the punishment in the 1740s. These gibbetings reflected the increasingly severe measures taken to eradicate the crime of smuggling. They were temporally and spatially specific, reflecting the nature of the crimes and the circumstances that led to the hanging in chains. This study provides an insight into the extreme use of a particular punishment, showing that judicial penalties were adapted to fit the circumstances of the crimes and reflect how the offences were perceived. Hanging a body in chains was a post-execution punishment used to subject further humiliation and ignominy on criminals who were to be made an example of, or were deemed to have committed especially heinous crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon's Rock Authors
    Simon’s Rock Authors - Bard College at Simon’s Rock Alumni Library Abbas, Asma Liberalism and human suffering : materialist reflections on politics, ethics, and aesthetics / Asma FAC Abbas. New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010 Stacks -- Call#: JC574 .A274 2010 Abbott, Alana Joli Departure / [Alana Abbott] ALUM McComb, MS : White Silver Pub, 2006 Stacks -- Call#: PS3601 .B353 D42 2006 Adler Beléndez, Ekiwah The coyote's trace : a collection of poems / Ekiwah Adler Beléndez ALUM Amatlán, Morelos, México : Ediciones del Arkan, 2006 Stacks -- Call#: PQ7298.1 .D54 C66 2006 Adler Beléndez, Ekiwah Palabras inagotables : [a collection of poems] / Ekiwah Adler Beléndez ALUM Jiutepec, México : ConNow/Otr@as, 2001 Stacks -- Call#: PQ7298.1 .D54 P35 2001 Adler Beléndez, Ekiwah Soy : poemas y cuentos / Ekiwah Adler Beléndez ALUM Amatlán, Morelos, México : Ediciones del Arkan, 2001 Stacks -- Call#: PQ7298.1 .D54 S69 2001 Adler Beléndez, Ekiwah Weaver : a collection of poems / Ekiwah Adler Beléndez ALUM Amatlán, Morelos, México : Ediciones del Arkan, 2003 Stacks -- Call#: PQ7298.1.D4 W43 2003 Alford, Henry Big kiss : one actor's desperate attempt to claw his way to the top / Henry Alford ALUM New York : Villard, c2000 Stacks -- Call#: PN2055 .A54 2000 Alford, Henry How to live : a search for wisdom from old people / Henry Alford ALUM New York : Twelve, 2009 Stacks -- Call#: HQ1061 .A52 2009 Alford, Henry Municipal bondage / Henry Alford ALUM New York : Random House, c1993 Stacks -- Call#: PN6162 .A365 1993 Alford, Henry Would it kill you to stop doing
    [Show full text]
  • PUNISHING the CRIMINAL CORPSE, 1700-1840 Aggravated Forms of the Death Penalty in England
    palgrave historical studies in the criminal corpse and its afterlife PUNISHING THE CRIMINAL CORPSE, 1700-1840 Aggravated Forms of the Death Penalty in England Peter King Palgrave Historical Studies in the Criminal Corpse and its Afterlife Series Editors Owen Davies School of Humanities University of Hertfordshire Hatfield, UK Elizabeth T. Hurren School of Historical Studies University of Leicester Leicester, UK Sarah Tarlow History and Archaeology University of Leicester Leicester, UK This limited, finite series is based on the substantive outputs from a major, multi-disciplinary research project funded by the Wellcome Trust, inves- tigating the meanings, treatment, and uses of the criminal corpse in Britain. It is a vehicle for methodological and substantive advances in approaches to the wider history of the body. Focussing on the period between the late seventeenth and the mid-nineteenth centuries as a crucial period in the formation and transformation of beliefs about the body, the series explores how the criminal body had a prominent presence in popular culture as well as science, civic life and medico-legal activity. It is historically significant as the site of overlapping and sometimes contradictory understandings between scientific anatomy, criminal justice, popular medicine, and social geography. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/14694 Peter King Punishing the Criminal Corpse, 1700–1840 Aggravated Forms of the Death Penalty in England Peter King University of Leicester Leicester, UK Palgrave Historical Studies in the Criminal Corpse and its Afterlife ISBN 978-1-137-51360-1 ISBN 978-1-137-51361-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-51361-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017944586 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Grove Press Atlantic Monthly Press Black Cat the Mysterious Press
    Grove Press Atlantic Monthly Press Black Cat The Mysterious Press Spring/Summer 2016 APRIL “No volume serves juicier dish on punk’s New York birth . Tales of sex, drugs and music that will make you wish you’d been there.”—Rolling Stone Please Kill Me The Uncensored Oral History of Punk 20th Anniversary Edition With a new afterword by the authors Legs McNeil and Gillian McCain MARKETING “Ranks up there with the great rock & roll books of all time.” —Time Out New York 20th anniversary festivities to kick off nce the most reviled musical movement in history, now a global rally- with New York launch event and include ing cry for the young and rebellious, punk has energy and power that celebrity and author events around the remain undiluted. A contemporary classic that has inspired scores of country and media interviews O other books, Please Kill Me is the definitive oral history of the most nihilist of 40th anniversary of infamous first Ramones album will bring attention and music fans to all pop movements. Iggy Pop, Richard Hell, Dee Dee and Joey Ramone, Mal- the book colm McLaren, Jim Carroll, and scores of other famous and infamous punk tie-in to two 1-hour radio specials syndicated figures lend their voices to this decisive account of that outrageous, explosive nationally to National Public Radio affiliates era. From its origins in the twilight years of Andy Warhol’s New York reign to and college stations in April and May 2016 its last gasps as eighties corporate rock, the phenomenon that was known as cross promotion on pleasekillme.com punk is scrutinized, eulogized, and celebrated by the people who were there.
    [Show full text]
  • Third-Party Politics
    CO\ IK U LUS riUTiON: James Gillray, English, 1757-1815 Britania Ir Assassination, or the Republicans Ammement, ijSz engraving Gift of Miss Susan Dwight Bliss 1956.24.309 below; J. Phillips, English, eighteenth century The Present State of Great Britain (detail of engraving; see page 7) OREWORD In planning this publication, we have chosen to meander down paths that sometimes stray far from the prints on view in the exhibition, touching upon EngHsh radicahsm and print journahsm, the response to the French Revolution by the proper- tied classes of England, and attempts by Crown and Parliament to police and control what could be said in print and what images could be published. We hope our reflections offer some context within which to "read" these remnants of visual and material culture. For eighteenth-century monarchs restlessly watching as radical journalists churned out seditious texts, the stream of paper off the presses might have produced sweat under the collar (especially at the thought of poor Louis in France). It is a stretch, but does the guillotine not look a lot like a printing press? Replace a blade with a plate and a neck with a sheet of paper. The printer John Wilkes, champion of the free press, said of William Hogarth's skill at caricature that he could "gibbet in colour" like no one else. Within the next sixty years, the practice of gibbeting, the public display of dead, dying, or tortured bodies, would be almost completely retired by the British government as a form of punishment. Its purpose in the first place was to broadcast the power of the king to potentially unruly subjects; in a macabre way it was live media in a way that print could never be.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enlightenment, America's Death Penalty, and the Abolition Movement
    University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship Fall 2009 Revisiting Beccaria's Vision: The nliE ghtenment, America's Death Penalty, and the Abolition Movement John Bessler University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Revisiting Beccaria's Vision: The nlE ightenment, America's Death Penalty, and the Abolition Movement, 4 Nw. J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 196 (2009) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright 2009 by Northwestern University School of Law Volume 4 (Fall 2009) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy Revisiting Beccaria's Vision: The Enlightenment, America's Death Penalty, and the Abolition Movement John D. Bessler* I am certainly not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • Bloomberg News Expose of Kushner Real Estate Holdings Wins Gold Keyboard in 2018 New York Press Club Journalism Awards
    NEWS FROM THE NEW YORK PRESS CLUB www.nypressclub.org | @NYPressClub contact: Debra Caruso, DJC Communications 212.971.9708 [email protected] BLOOMBERG NEWS EXPOSE OF KUSHNER REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS WINS GOLD KEYBOARD IN 2018 NEW YORK PRESS CLUB JOURNALISM AWARDS "Unmasking the Kushner Real Estate Empire" by Bloomberg News is the grand-prize winner of the New York Press Club's 2018 Gold Keyboard. The NYPC's highest award singles out a pair of reporters who peeled back the layers to reveal real estate deals involving the Kushner family that stretched across the world and into the White House and that are now the subject of federal investigations. An additional 76 winners in 29 categories were selected from almost 500 entries submitted by TV, radio, newspapers, websites, magazines and newswires in New York City and around the U.S. Awards will be presented at the Club’s annual dinner, Monday, June 4, 2018 at The Water Club in Manhattan, 7 p.m. A special note this year: Washington Post editor-in-chief Martin Baron will receive the NYPC’s first non-contested award. The “Gabe Pressman Truth to Power Award” recognizes our friend, colleague and paragon – WNBC’s Gabe Pressman, who died last June – for his seven decades of reporting news and defending the First Amendment and media freedoms. “Marty Baron and Gabe Pressman are from different journalism eras but both share an indisputable passion for our craft and an unquenchable drive to present the truth and challenge corrupt power,” said NY Press Club president Steve Scott. Scott added that the high number of entries across all news media platforms attests to the continued good health of journalism despite challenges from some about the accuracy and legitimacy of professional journalists.
    [Show full text]