DOCSLIB.ORG

LEE Result 8Th Sem. B.Sc. Forestry 072-073 Final.Xlsx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LEE Result 8Th Sem. B.Sc. Forestry 072-073 Final.Xlsx Agriculture and Forestry University Office of the Controller Examinations Rampur, Chitwan Faculty : Forestry Result Sheet : B.Sc Forestry, 8th Semester Academic Year : 2072-073 LEE 401, 10(0+10) Learning for Entrepreneurial Experience Total (FM = Field Advisor Internal Examiner External Examiner % G GP CH CP TCH TCP OGPA R.N. 250) Research Report (FM=50) (FM=150) (FM=50) Obtained Marks Obtained Marks Obtained Marks 184 An Assessment of the Status of Bird Diversity in Bidur, Nuwakot 46 132 41 219 87.60 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Assessment of Status and Habitat Distribution of Paha (Nanorana rarica ) in Rara Lake Shore (A Case 185 40 138 38 216 86.40 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Study of Rara National Park) Status of Human-Common Leopard Conflict in Gulmi District (A Case Study from Resunga Municipality, 186 46 135 44 225 90.00 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Gulmi) 187 Chemical Properties of Soil under Different Land Use 40 145 41 226 90.40 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Resource Status, Ethno-botanical Uses and Market Potentiality of Seabuckthorn (A Case Study of Kalika 188 46 135 32 213 85.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Community Forest, Pachaljharana Rural Municipality Ward-08, Kalikot) An Assessment of Roadside Plantation: Floral Diversity and People's Perception (A Case Study of 189 44 132 41 217 86.80 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Kathmandu Ringroad Plantation) 190 Forest Investment Program (FIP) and REDD+ Linkage in Nepal 44 130 44 218 87.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 191 An Assessment of Capacity Building Program of REDD Implementation Center in Nepal 42 132 39 213 85.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 192 Butterfly Diversity and Abundance in Karnali Floodplain of Bardiya National Park 42 146 42 230 92.00 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Variation in Estimated and Actual Timber Volume (A Case Study from Buddhashanti Collaborative Forest 193 46 148 45 239 95.60 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Nawalparasi, 'West') Impacts of Climate Change and Local Adaptation Measures (A Case Study of Tila Rural Municipality, 194 46 148 48 242 96.80 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Jumla) An Assessment on Human Elephant Conflict and its Control Measures in Jhapa District (A Case Study 195 38 140 38 216 86.40 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 from Mechinagar Municipality) Time Based Analysis of the Aboveground Tree Biomass and Carbon Stock (A Case Study from Lumbini 196 38 135 40 213 85.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Collaborative Foerst, Rupandehi) Variation in Regeneration Status and Species Diversity in a Scientifically Managed Community Forest (A 197 46 148 46 240 96.00 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Case Study from Pashupati Community Forest, Manahari, Makwanpur District) An Assessment of Status and Conservation Challenges of Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb (A Case Study on 198 44 140 42 226 90.40 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Trishakti CF, Dang) Forestry Activities for The Sustenance of Livelihood and Adaptation to Climate Change in The Mountain 199 46 138 47 231 92.40 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Region (A Case Study from Chhayanath Rara Municipality-04, Mugu District) Assessment of Ecology, Distribution and Habitat Preference of Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens ) in Shey 200 44 138 43 225 90.00 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Phoksundo National Park An Assessment of Different Ecological and Anthropogenic Factors Effecting Conservation of Red Panda 201 44 134 42 220 88.00 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 (Ailurus fulgens ) in Shey Phoksundo National Park, Dolpa Abundance Survey and Status Assessment of Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens ) in Shey Phoksundo National 202 40 135 42 217 86.80 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Park 203 Biodiversity Conservation Practices Outside PAs: Role of Private and Community Forest 44 120 44 208 83.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 204 44 142 47 233 93.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Forest Fire Pattern and Risk Assessment: Community Level Management Approach in Udayapur District 205 A Review Report on REDD+ and Environmental Safeguards in Nepal 46 144 43 233 93.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Assessment of Status of Dalbergia Latifolia and Pterocarpus Marsupium (A Case Study from Three 206 40 139 45 224 89.60 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Community Forests and One Collaborative Forest in Rupandehi District) Role of Agroforestry Practices in Rural Livelihood (A Case Study of Bakaiya Rural Municipality, 207 42 136 44 222 88.80 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Makwanpur) Study on Status of Roadside Plantation (A Case Study of Road Section: Neuro Road-Budanilkantha, 208 46 133 46 225 90.00 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Kathmandu, Nepal) Comparing Forest Reference Level Between Three Intercontinental Countries: A Quest for Better FRL 209 46 148 43 237 94.80 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Estimation Economic Contribution of NTFPs to the Livelihood of Local People in Mugam Karmarong Rural 210 46 138 44 228 91.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Municipality, Mugu 211 Gaps and Challenges in Grant Facilitating System in Forest Enterprises of Nepal 40 135 43 218 87.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Human-Black Bear Conflict in Jajarkot District (A Case Study of Barekot Rural Municipality of Jajarkot 212 36 125 38 199 79.60 B 3 10 30 10 30 3.00 District) The Role of Non-Timber Forest Products in Financial Capital of Local People (A Case Study of Himchuli 213 36 130 42 208 83.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Hiutala Community Forest of Palata Rural Municipality, Kalikot) 214 Estimation of Potential Soil Erosion in Pasagadh Micro-Watershed Jajarkot using RUSLE and GIS 44 142 42 228 91.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Tree Outside Forest : Diversity, Community Perceptions and Income Contribution to the Household 215 46 139 47 232 92.80 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Economy (A Case Study from Gaindakot Municipality, Ward No.7 & 8, Nawalparasi 'East') Decision Making Role of Women in Community Forestry (A case study from Janahit Community Forest 216 36 135 39 210 84.00 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 User Group, Makawanpur District) Status of Human Wildlife Conflict in Chitwan National Park (A Case Study from Kumroj Buffer zone 217 44 130 38 212 84.80 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Community Forest) Variation in Soil Organic Carbon Under Different Forest Types (A Case Study from Shivapuri Nagarjun 218 46 139 46 231 92.40 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 National Park, Nepal) Assessing Contribution of Agroforestry Practices in Species Biodiversity and Meeting Rural Needs (A Case 219 38 135 41 214 85.60 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Study of Manahari Watershed of Makawanpur District) Assessment of Social Adoption of Scientific Forest Management in Community Forest of Terai Region (A 220 40 141 39 220 88.00 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Case Study of Trishakti Community Forest User Group, Mormi, Kapilvastu, Nepal) A Research Report on Human Wildlife Conflict in Banke National Park (A Case Study from Rimna Buffer 221 46 143 31 220 88.00 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Zone Community Forest, Banke) An Assessment on Community-Based Forest Micro-Enterprise: Impacts and Problems (A Case Study from 222 42 125 38 205 82.00 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Sundari Community Forest of Nawalpur District) Assessment of Agroforestry Practices in Far-Westren Hills of Nepal (A Case Study from Dhakari-6, 223 38 135 38 211 84.40 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Amgaun Achham District) 224 A Review Report on REDD⁺ Social Safeguard and Interventions 46 138 45 229 91.60 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Comparative Study of Roles Played by Marginalized and Non-Marginalized Group in Community Forest 225 44 135 45 224 89.60 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Management (A Case Study from Ukalepipal Community Forest Tansen, Plapa) 226 Effect of Fire and Cutting on Vegetation Properties in the Grassland of Bardiya National Park, Nepal 46 141 46 233 93.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Value Chain Analysis of Timur (Zanthoxylum armatum ) in Surkhet District (A Case Study of Barahataal 227 36 116 37 189 75.60 B 3 10 30 10 30 3.00 Rural Municipality) Economics Analysis of Scientific Forest Management in Community Forest of Terai (A Case Study from 228 44 145 42 231 92.40 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Dhuseri Community Forest of Nawalpur District, Nepal) Ecotourism Potentiality of Community Forest (A Case Study of Chure Kalilekh Community Forest of 229 40 133 38 211 84.40 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Makawanpur District). 230 Study of Springs and Their Associated Social Aspects in Villages of Kaskikot, Kaski 44 142 42 228 91.20 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 231 Human Wildlife Conflict: A Case Study from Barahatal Rural Municipality of Surkhet District 36 112 36 184 73.60 B 3 10 30 10 30 3.00 Assessment on Source of Income, Expenditure and Contribution to Users Group (A Case Study from 232 44 140 46 230 92.00 A 4 10 40 10 40 4.00 Kankali Community Forest User Group of Chitwan District).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CECI Nepal's Newsletter
    INSIDE THIS ISSUE: CECI Nepal AGM 1 Celebration of Open Data Day 4 National Advocacy Campaign 6 Creating Jobs 7 Uniterra Towards Fostering 12 CECI Nepal’s Partnership Partner Organization Workshop 13 Newsletter Volunteer’s Blog: Status of 14 Women in Nepal SUSASAN in Media 15 January-April 2019 1 VOLUME , ISSUE 2 VOLUME , ISSUE Dear Friends, MESSAGE Welcome to the CECI Nepal’s Newsletter “REFLECT”! I am delighted to present you the latest edition of CECI Nepal’s newslet- ter “REFLECT”. In this edition, you will get a glimpse of our major activi- FROM THE ties carried out between January to April, 2019. In this quarter, we are almost at the end of Livelihood Promotion for Earthquake aected Population in Nepal (PUNARNIRMAN) project and COUNTRY wrapping up its activities. The most exciting part of PUNARNIRMAN project is the local government has shown their willingness to support further and beneciaries are linked to the local institutions. At the same DIRECTOR time, we are looking forward to the year ahead as we build on our com- mitment to capacity building of CSOs for good governance, gender equal- ity and social inclusion. I would like to thank all our partners, including government agencies, Australian Government Department of Foreign Aairs and Trade (DFAT), Global Aairs Canada (GAC), INGOs and civil society organizations for their continued cooperation and invaluable work with us. Everyday, I see the team moving forward with their full commitment in achieving CECI’s mission and I would like to oer my sincere thanks to the CECI Nepal team and volunteers for their support and dedication.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Evaluation of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay of Kawasoti Municipality in Nawalpur, Nepal
    IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 25, Issue 7, Series 4 (July. 2020) 01-10 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org Performance Evaluation of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay of Kawasoti Municipality in Nawalpur, Nepal Dr. Rajan Binayek Pasa Assistant Professor at Central Department of Rural Development Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu ABSTRACT:This study analyzed performance evaluation of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay (ABCH) of Kawasoti Municipality. This study followed post-positivist paradigm and survey methodology by applying evaluation indicators such as relevancy, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability. The research issueshave been theorized from social capital, ecotourism, asset based community developmentand sustainability approach on development.The survey result shows that relevancy got highest mean value 3.9922 with std. deviation 0.90575 which is followed by impact mean value 3.7871 with std. deviation 0.78242 and sustainability mean value 3.6325 with std. deviation 0.79901. It signifies that majority of respondents are relatively satisfied with relevancy, impact and sustainability related variables. More so, effectiveness secured least mean value 3.5145 with std. deviation 0.85903 that is followed by efficiency mean value 3.6052 with std. deviation 0.78690. The value its self is not disagreed views of the respondents but from evaluation perspectives it requires more attention. However, ABCH has performed effectively due to the strong social capital, conservation and mobilization fund, good networks of physical assets, as well as quality leaderships that has brought positive impacts in community and social level. Finally, this study has high implications in the sector of improving the lives of people residing around bufferzone through the tourism activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism in Nepal: the Models for Assessing Performance of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay in Nawalpur
    NJDRS 51 CDRD DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/njdrs.v17i0.34952 Tourism in Nepal: The Models for Assessing Performance of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay in Nawalpur Rajan Binayek Pasa, PhD Lecturer at Central Department of Rural Development Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu Email for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract This study assesses performance of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay that received best homestay award in 2017. For the survey study, the datacollected from 236 sample respondents were theorized based on social capital, ecotourism, asset-based community development and sustainability approach that are then supported by the empirical findings. An index was developed to describe the overall performance of the homestay by compositing five thematic indexes: relevancy, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, sustainability. The index value 92.65 from the range of minimum 48 and maximum 240 for the overall performance provides the strong quantitative evidence to answer the question “why did Amaltari receive the best award among”. The multiple regression model (R-square value 0.99) for overall performance also proves that independent variables describe the dependent variables by 99 percent. Among the independent variables relevancy and effectiveness indexes are more likely to describe dependent variable- the overall performance index. The evidence shows that Amaltari homestay has performed well due to the technical/financial supports of WWF, proper mobilization/utilization of conservation fund and homestay community fund, strong social capital, and quality leadership that has transforming the livelihoods of Tharu, Bote and Mushar indigeneous people. However, they have some concerns like waste management in bufferzone areas, reviving the cultural organizations for preserving and transmitting culture from generation to generation, minimizing the modernization and demonstrative effects due to the excessive flow of the tourists and upgrading road connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Gaindakot As Fringe of Bharatpur Metropolitan City)
    Proceedings of 8th IOE Graduate Conference Peer Reviewed ISSN: 2350-8914 (Online), 2350-8906 (Print) Year: 2020 Month: June Volume: 8 Impacts of Urbanization on Land Use in Urban Fringe (A case of Gaindakot as fringe of Bharatpur Metropolitan City) Seema Pandey a, Ajay Chandra Lal b a, b Department of Architecture, Pulchowk Campus, IOE, TU, Nepal Corresponding Email: a [email protected], b [email protected] Abstract The urban fringe areas go through lots of transformations due to urbanisation but lack of proper planning and policies in such fringe areas leads to haphazard and unplanned growth, placing enormous pressures on natural resources, existing services and infrastructures. Bharatpur Metropolitan City is one of the fastest growing cities in Nepal which serves as commercial centre of Chitwan district. The city has been growing bigger and it will have its impacts on its fringe areas. Since migration rate is increasing in Bharatpur, this is likely to spread urban sprawl in adjoining areas, Gaindakot municipality being one of them.This paper uses multiple theoretical framework and qualitative research approach to find out the effects of urbanization on various aspects and the patterns of land use changes in Gaindakot with the increasing urbanisation over the years. Managing rapid urbanization poses challenges that require urgent policy attention. Otherwise, this may lead to rapid and uncontrolled sprawl; irregular, substandard, and inaccessible housing development; loss of open space, and decreased livability as in Kathmandu valley due to unplanned urban development. Keywords Urbanization, Urban fringe, Urban sprawl, Land use, Gaindakot (Nepal) 1. Background [5,6]. Nepalese cities have been urbanizing haphazardly.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2077 Fiscal Year 2076/2077
    Sarlahi Campus Malangawa-4,Sarlahi,Nepal Estd.2037 Email id : [email protected] Website : sarlahicampus.com Phone : 046520373 Fax : 046520373 Mob.No.9854036425 Annual Report 2077 Fiscal Year 2076/2077 Date: 2077/09/10 Foreword Sarlahi Campus heartily welcomes all the prospective students and their parents to be the part of motivation learning environment. Which is renowned for its quality education and well-designed infrastructure having students friendly outdoor activities according to demand of modern era. Sarlahi campus occupies a unique position from the +2 level to master level throughout the district. The most essential achievement that the record of this campus shows is the placement of different pass out students in various positions in the country. We are proud of our supportive environment of best teaching and learning activities, amicable. Administrative staff and well-experienced and well-specialized teaching staff. Finally, I would like to express my heartiest thanks to all the students, parents, management committee members, administrative staff and students union members for their kind co-operation in the conduction of campus. We are committed to provide excellence in academics, being responsive to workforce needs, utilizing innovative technology and engaging our community partners. We will carefully manage our campus growth while expanding our role in promoting environmental responsibility. It is these strategic goals that will drive our institution through 2020 as we collectively create our future at SCM. Hira Prasad Kumha Campus Chief Sarlahi Campus Malangwa Table Of Contents INSTITUTION'S BACKGROUND 1 Sarlahi District 2 Malangwa Municipality 3 Sarlahi Campus 4. ACADEMIC PROGRESS 4.1 Enrollment Trends Analysis 4.2 Pass Rate Trend Analysis 4.3 Graduate Trend Rate Analysis 5.
    [Show full text]
  • WRRP Annual Report 2019
    Centre for Agro-Ecology and Development (CAED) Women's Reproductive Rights Program (WRRP) Discussion with women's network in Sisautia village in Sarlahi district Report # 5 July – December 2019 Women's Reproductive Rights Program (WRRP) Centre for Agro-Ecology and Development (CAED) P.O. BOX: 4555, Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: 01- 5180340, Khotang: 036-420729, Sarlahi: 046-521312 Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Website: www.wrrpnepal.org / www.Caed.org.np 1 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. BROADER CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................ 4 3. MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS .................................................................................................................. 6 4. METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................. 8 MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................ 8 MCC MOBILIZATION .................................................................................................................... 8 5. LEARNINGS ..................................................................................................................................... 9 ADAPTATION OF THE LEARNINGS ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal RWSSP-WN Nepal
    Mid -Term Evaluation of the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project in Western Nepal, Phase II (RWSSP-WN II) Final Report April 30th, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... i Preface ........................................................................................................................................... iii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................ iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... vi TIIVISTELMÄ ................................................................................................................................. xii 1. PURPOSE OF MID-TERM EVALUATION ................................................................................ 1 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE CONTEXT AND RWSSP-WN PHASE II ............................................ 1 2.1 Development Context of RWSSP-WN II ................................................................................. 1 2.1.1. Country Context ............................................................................................................ 1 2.1.2. Coverage of Rural Water Supply and Sanitation ........................................................... 3 2.1.3. Sector Institutions ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Violations in the Name of Conservation “What Crime Had I Committed by Putting My Feet on the Land That I Own?”
    VIOLATIONS IN THE NAME OF CONSERVATION “WHAT CRIME HAD I COMMITTED BY PUTTING MY FEET ON THE LAND THAT I OWN?” Amnesty International is a movement of 10 million people which mobilizes the humanity in everyone and campaigns for change so we can all enjoy our human rights. Our vision is of a world where those in power keep their promises, respect international law and are held to account. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and individual donations. We believe that acting in solidarity and compassion with people everywhere can change our societies for the better. © Amnesty International 2021 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: Illustration by Colin Foo (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. Photo: Chitwan National Park, Nepal. © Jacek Kadaj via Getty Images https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2021 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 31/4536/2021 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.1 PROTECTING ANIMALS, EVICTING PEOPLE 5 1.2 ANCESTRAL HOMELANDS HAVE BECOME NATIONAL PARKS 6 1.3 HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BY THE NEPAL ARMY 6 1.4 EVICTION IS NOT THE ANSWER 6 1.5 CONSULTATIVE, DURABLE SOLUTIONS ARE A MUST 7 1.6 LIMITED POLITICAL WILL 8 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal National Association of Rural Municipality Association of District Coordination (Muan) in Nepal (NARMIN) Committees of Nepal (ADCCN)
    Study Organized by Municipality Association of Nepal National Association of Rural Municipality Association of District Coordination (MuAN) in Nepal (NARMIN) Committees of Nepal (ADCCN) Supported by Sweden European Sverige Union "This document has been financed by the Swedish "This publication was produced with the financial support of International Development Cooperation Agency, Sida. Sida the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of does not necessarily share the views expressed in this MuAN, NARMIN, ADCCN and UCLG and do not necessarily material. Responsibility for its content rests entirely with the reflect the views of the European Union'; author." Publication Date June 2020 Study Organized by Municipality Association of Nepal (MuAN) National Association of Rural Municipality in Nepal (NARMIN) Association of District Coordination Committees of Nepal (ADCCN) Supported by Sweden Sverige European Union Expert Services Dr. Dileep K. Adhikary Editing service for the publication was contributed by; Mr Kalanidhi Devkota, Executive Director, MuAN Mr Bimal Pokheral, Executive Director, NARMIN Mr Krishna Chandra Neupane, Executive Secretary General, ADCCN Layout Designed and Supported by Edgardo Bilsky, UCLG world Dinesh Shrestha, IT Officer, ADCCN Table of Contents Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Forewords .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Research in NEPAL for Tiger Conservation
    GROUNDWATER RESEARCH IN NEPAL FOR TIGER CONSERVATION A reconnaissance study to groundwater dynamics in an alluvial mega-fan in Bardiya National Park (Terai), focusing on the interaction between groundwater and the Karnali river. Author: Hanne. Berghuis. MSc. Thesis. Program: Earth, Surface and Water at Utrecht University. 1st Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Jasper Griffioen. 2nd Supervisor: Dr. Derek Karssenberg. Date: 28-06-2019. Student No.: 6190987. Contact: [email protected]. Photo credits: Esther Leystra (2019). Nepal: Bardiya National Park. Acknowledgement I’d like to thank my supervisor Jasper Griffioen for the opportunity to hydrologically explore Bardiya. His enthusiasm for the project was inspiring and his close involvement was very motivating. My friend Ewa van Kooten introduced me to this project. Together we travelled to Nepal for three months. Thanks to her I enjoyed every single day of our time in Bardiya. She often came up with new ideas for field measurements, creative ways to fabricate field equipment or interpretations for unexpected observations. I am grateful for the Himalayan Tiger Foundation (HTF), who took the initial initiative for hydrological research in Bardiya. I very much appreciate their efforts for the conservation of the wild tiger. During the meetings in the Netherlands and around the campfire in Bardiya with the members and co of HTF, I have learned and laughed a lot. Moreover, I like to thank them for getting us in touch with the National Trust for Nature Conservation (NTNC). The staff of NTNC heartily welcomed us in Bardiya and at their office. They made us feel like a part of the NTNC-family by letting us join their festivals, dinners and campfires.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    ANNUAL2018 REPORT Message from the Country Director Last year, we commemorated the 30th anniversary of Adventist Development and Relief Agency- ADRA Nepal. One more year has been completed now. As the years pass on, we have felt added responsibility to serve people in Nepal. We had begun services in the year of 1987 with a focus in health sector. Today as per the needs of community and priority of the government of Nepal, we have expanded to multiple sectors. Currently, our programs are focused on Health, Livelihood, Disaster Risk Management and Education. Our initiatives have been closely connected to the long-term development priorities set by the government of Nepal that put emphasis on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In the year 2018, we worked on dierent projects under four core themes ADRA Nepal has been working with as per its strategic direction. Some of the projects built on our previous initiatives targeted to the communities aected by the devastating earthquake of 2015 as it’s impacts on agriculture, education, and health sector remained critical. We work with people in poverty and distress to create just and positive change through empowering partnerships and responsible action. While translating this vision to an action, we have been indebted to several organizations and individuals. I would like to thank all the ADRA works with development partners including the government of Nepal, multilateral and bilateral organizations, ADRA International and ADRA supporting oces, consortium partners, people in poverty implementing partner NGOs and people we worked with throughout the year and ADRA and distress to Nepal colleagues for their continuous support and commitments.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Paper Status of Tiger and Its Conservation Efforts in Nepal
    International Journal of Global Science Research ISSN: 2348-8344 (Online) Vol. 7, Issue 1, April 2020, pp. 1277-1283 DOI: 10.26540/ijgsr.v7.i1.2020.149 Available Online at www.ijgsr.com © Copyright 2014 | ijgsr.com | All Rights Reserved Review Paper Status of tiger and its conservation efforts in Nepal: A review Nabina Dhakal1*, Sami Shrestha2 and Jiban Shrestha3 1Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal 2Institute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Hariyokharka, Pokhara-15, Nepal 3Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Agriculture Botany Division, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal *Corresponding author email: [email protected] Received: 01/03/2020 Revised: 14/03/2020 Accepted: 30/03/2020 Abstract: Tiger (Panthera tigris) is one of INTRODUCTION the most endangered wildlife species in Tiger (Panthera tigris) is considered as Nepal. Currently there are 235 tigers symbol of strength, mysterious and noble counted in Nepal. The areas of habitat of beings. It is the largest cat (feline) species tigers have been extended from 4502.5 km2 with pattern of dark vertical stripes on (before 2010) to 6167.12 km2 (after 2018). reddish-orange fur with a lighter underside Five national parks (Chitwan, Bardia, along with muscular body, powerful Banke, Shuklaphata and Parsa National forelimbs, large head and a tail that is about Parks), four protection forest (Brandabhar, half the length of the body. They are Khata, Baanta and Laljhadi Protection generally different in size with Forest) and one conservation area distinguishable sexual dimorphism (Krishnasaar Conservation Area) are between males and females, with females preserving tigers in Nepal. Tigers have being smaller than males. A 2016 survey been facing extinction due to poaching, loss found out 3,890 wild tigers and 5,000 of habitat from urbanization and specimens in the United States (WWF, deforestation, and depletion of prey 2018).
    [Show full text]