Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications Xxx (2015) Xxx–Xxx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications Xxx (2015) Xxx–Xxx Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications xxx (2015) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications journal homepage: www.jdcjournal.com Predictors of improvement and progression of diabetic polyneuropathy following treatment with α-lipoic acid for 4 years in the NATHAN 1 trial Dan Ziegler a,b,⁎, Phillip A. Low c, Roy Freeman d, Hans Tritschler e, Aaron I. Vinik f a Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center at Heinrich Heine University, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research, Düsseldorf, Germany b Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany c Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA d Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA e MEDA Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Bad Homburg, Germany f Department of Medicine, EVMS Strelitz Diabetes Research Center and Neuroendocrine Unit, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA article info abstract Article history: Aims: We aimed to analyze the impact of baseline factors on the efficacy of α-lipoic acid (ALA) over 4 years in Received 1 October 2015 the NATHAN 1 trial. Received in revised form 30 October 2015 Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of the NATHAN 1 trial, a 4-year randomized study including 460 Accepted 31 October 2015 diabetic patients with mild-to-moderate polyneuropathy using ALA 600 mg qd or placebo. Amongst others, Available online xxxx efficacy measures were the Neuropathy Impairment Score of the lower limbs (NIS-LL) and heart rate during deep breathing (HRDB). Keywords: Results: Improvement and prevention of progression of NIS-LL (ΔNIS-LL ≥ 2 points) with ALA vs. placebo Diabetic polyneuropathy α-lipoic acid after 4 years was predicted by higher age, lower BMI, male sex, normal blood pressure, history of Neuropathic impairments cardiovascular disease (CVD), insulin treatment, longer duration of diabetes and neuropathy, and higher Autonomic function neuropathy stage. Participants treated with ALA who received ACE inhibitors showed a better outcome in Cardiovascular risk factors HRDB after 4 years. Conclusions: Better outcome in neuropathic impairments following 4-year treatment with α-lipoic acid was predicted by normal BMI and blood pressure and higher burden due to CVD, diabetes, and neuropathy, while improvement in cardiac autonomic function was predicted by ACE inhibitor treatment. Thus, optimal control of CVD risk factors could contribute to improved efficacy of α-lipoic acid in patients with higher disease burden. © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction er-limb amputation (Rajamani et al., 2009). On the other hand, history of myocardial infarction and CVD and the underlying risk factors such About one third of all patients with diabetes are affected by as obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia may predict the risk of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) which has a major developing DSPN (Forrest, Maser, Pambianco, Becker, & Orchard, impact on morbidity and mortality (Ziegler, Papanas, Vinik, & Shaw, 1997; Sands, Shetterly, Franklin, & Hamman, 1997; Tesfaye et al., 2014). Neuropathic sensory deficits such as reduced touch and 2005; Wiggin et al., 2009; Ylitalo, Sowers, & Heeringa, 2011; Ziegler vibration perception are independent predictors of mortality et al., 2008; Ziegler et al., 2009). (Coppini, Bowtell, Weng, Young, & Sönksen, 2000), cardiac death or Effective causal treatment of DSPN remains challenging for the nonfatal myocardial infarction (Young et al., 2009), incident cardio- physician. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiol- vascular disease (CVD) events (Brownrigg et al., 2014), and low- ogy of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study demonstrated that intensive diabetes therapy in type 1 diabetic individual retards but not fully prevents the development of DSPN and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) (Martin, Albers, Pop- Conflict of interest: DZ received honoraria for speaking and consulting activities Busui, & DCCT/EDIC Research Group, 2014; The Diabetes Control and from MEDA Pharma. HT is employee of MEDA Pharma. Complications Trial Research Group, 1993). In contrast, there is no ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00977483 clear evidence that intensive diabetes therapy or a target-driven ⁎ Corresponding author at: German Diabetes Center, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, 40225 fi Düsseldorf. Tel.: +49 211 33820; fax: +49 211 3382244. intensi ed intervention aimed at multiple risk cardiovascular factors E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Ziegler). favorably influence the development or progression of DSPN and CAN http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.10.018 1056-8727/$© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Please cite this article as: Ziegler, D., et al., Predictors of improvement and progression of diabetic polyneuropathy following treatment with α-lipoic acid for 4 ..., Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.10.018 2 D. Ziegler et al. / Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications xxx (2015) xxx–xxx in type 2 diabetic subjects (Boussageon et al., 2011; Charles et al., Table 1 ⁎ 2011; Charles et al., 2013; Gaede, Lund-Andersen, Parving, & Clinical characteristics of the intention-to-treat population at baseline. Pedersen, 2008; Sandbæk et al., 2014). In fact, self-reported history α-Lipoic acid Placebo P value of neuropathy was a significant predictor for increased mortality in n 230 224 patients with type 2 diabetes allocated to a very intensive diabetes Age (years) 53.3 ± 8.3 53.9 ± 7.6 0.3607 therapy aimed at HbA1c b6.0% in the ACCORD trial (Calles-Escandón Sex (% male) 66.1 67.0 0.8430 2010). On the other hand, near-normoglycemia is difficult to achieve BMI (kg/m2) 29.7 ± 6.1 29.8 ± 6.1 0.9226 in a considerable number of individuals with diabetes. Thus, there is Heart rate (bpm) 76.3 ± 12.3 74.6 ± 12.6 0.1603 TYPE 1/Type 2 Diabetes (%) 27.4/72.6 21.0/79.0 0.1111 an unmet need for disease-modifying treatments considering the Diabetes duration (years) 13.3 (0.8–56.1) 13.5 (0.9–46.7) 0.4190 pathogenetic mechanisms contributing to DSPN. Since diabetic Neuropathy duration (years) 3.0 (0.0–25.4) 3.2 (0.0–21.1) 0.2588 neuropathy is closely linked to CVD and both oxidative stress and Insulin treatment (%) 58.9 55.1 0.4170 vascular dysfunction play a paramount pathogenetic role (Nishikawa HbA1c (%) 8.9 ± 1.8 8.8 ± 1.9 0.6354 Fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) 11.1 ± 4.68 10.9 ± 4.26 0.6529 et al., 2000; Ziegler, Buchholz, Sohr, Nourooz-Zadeh, & Roden, 2015), Nephropathy (%) 11.7 12.0 0.5935 α agents that reduce oxidative stress such as -lipoic acid (ALA) and Retinopathy (%) 45.5 43.6 0.6833 those ameliorating vascular dysfunction and promote vasodilatation Neuropathy stage 1/stage 2a (%) 11.3/88.7 9.8/90.2 0.6074 such as ACE inhibitors have been evaluated in clinical trials showing NIS-LL + 7 (nds) 17.1 ± 8.4 16.8 ± 8.0 0.6740 improvement of DSPN and CAN (Malik et al., 1998; Papanas & Ziegler, NIS (points) 12.7 ± 8.6 12.2 ± 7.8 0.5062 NIS-LL (points) 9.8 ± 5.6 9.5 ± 5.3 0.6087 2014; Ruggenenti et al., 2011). Peroneal MNCV (m/s) 38.5 ± 5.03 38.1 ± 6.48 0.4957 The efficacy and safety of ALA have been assessed in several Sural SNAP (μV) 2.49 ± 3.38 2.43 ± 3.21 0.8387 controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses (Papanas & Ziegler, 2014). Vibration perception threshold (JND) 21.27 ± 3.18 21.21 ± 3.52 0.8393 In the NATHAN 1 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of α-lipoic Cold detection threshold (JND) 17.86 ± 5.14 17.58 ± 5.33 0.5765 acid over 4 years in patients with mild-to-moderate DSPN (Ziegler Heart rate deep breathing (bpm) 7.26 ± 5.44 8.59 ± 6.59 0.0193 NSC weakness (number) 0.06 ± 0.30 0.03 ± 0.23 0.2353 et al., 2011). The primary outcome measure was a composite score NSC weakness (severity) 0.10 ± 0.56 0.04 ± 0.31 0.1613 including the Neuropathy Impairment Score of the lower limbs and 7 Total symptom score (points) 2.4 ± 1.9 2.6 ± 1.8 0.2752 nerve function tests (NIS-LL + 7 tests). Primary analysis showed no Data are mean ± SD, median (range), or % of patients. significant difference between the groups for the changes in NIS = Neuropathy Impairment Score, JND = just noticeable difference, LL = lower limbs, NIS-LL + 7 tests from baseline to 4 years (p = 0.105). The lack of MNCV = motor nerve conduction velocity, SNAP = sensory nerve action potential. ⁎ improvement in the composite score was predominantly due to the Published previously in Ziegler et al. Efficacy and safety of antioxidant treatment with α-lipoic acid over 4 years in diabetic polyneuropathy: The NATHAN 1 Trial. Diabetes Care fact that nerve conduction deficits in the placebo-treated group did 2011; 34: 2054–2060. Copyright 2011 by the American Diabetes Association. not progress. In contrast, improvement on ALA vs. placebo was noted for NIS (p = 0.028) and NIS-LL (p = 0.05). More patients showed a clinically meaningful response and fewer showed progression with ALA than with placebo for NIS (p = 0.013) and NIS-LL (p = 0.025), motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), sural sensory nerve action respectively. The changes in nerve conduction and quantitative potential (SNAP) amplitude, change in heart rate during deep sensory testing did not differ between both groups after 4 years breathing (HRDB), cooling detection threshold (CDT), and heat pain – (Ziegler et al., 2011). response slope (HP 0.5 5.0). A clinically meaningful progression fi ≥ Based on the epidemiological and clinical evidence, here we (non-response) was de ned as an increase in NIS-LL by 2 points over hypothesized that CVD and its underlying risk factors which are 4 years (Dyck, Davies, Litchy, & O'Brien, 1997; Peripheral Nerve frequently encountered in type 2 diabetic patients and the concom- Society, 1995).
Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Appendix 1. Search Strategy for the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) Thorax Supplementary Appendix 1. Search strategy for the systematic review and meta-analysis # COVID-19 AND (ACEI or ARB) Pubmed #1. COVID-19 ((((novel[Title/Abstract]) AND (((corona[Title/Abstract]) AND virus[Title/Abstract]) OR (coronavirus[Title/Abstract]))) OR ((COVID[Title/Abstract]) OR (COVID-19[Title/Abstract]) OR (nCoV[Title/Abstract]) OR (2019-nCoV[Title/Abstract]) OR (Novel Coronavirus Pneumon.ia[Title/Abstract]) OR (NCP[Title/Abstract]) OR (severe acute respiratory infection[Title/Abstract]) OR (SARI[Title/Abstract]) OR (SARS-CoV-2[Title/Abstract]))) #2. ARB (("Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists"[Mesh]) OR (((angiotensin receptor blocker[Title/Abstract]) OR angiotensin receptor blockers[Title/Abstract]) OR ARB.*[Title/Abstract]) OR (((angiotensin[Title/Abstract]) AND receptor[Title/Abstract]) AND (antagonist.*[Title/Abstract] OR inhibitor.*[Title/Abstract] OR blocker.*[Title/Abstract]))) OR (ARB[Title/Abstract]) OR (olmesartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (valsartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (eprosartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (irbesartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (candesartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (losartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (telmisartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (azilsartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (tasosartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (embusartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (forasartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (milfasartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (saprisartan[Title/Abstract]) OR (zolasartan[Title/Abstract])
    [Show full text]
  • Renoprotective Effect of the Addition of Losartan to Ongoing Treatment with an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor in Type-2 Diabetic Patients with Nephropathy
    929 Hypertens Res Vol.30 (2007) No.10 p.929-935 Original Article Renoprotective Effect of the Addition of Losartan to Ongoing Treatment with an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor in Type-2 Diabetic Patients with Nephropathy Hirohiko ABE1), Shinya MINATOGUCHI1), Hiroshige OHASHI1), Ichijiro MURATA1), Taro MINAGAWA1), Toshio OKUMA1), Hitomi YOKOYAMA1), Hisato TAKATSU1), Tadatake TAKAYA1), Toshihiko NAGANO1), Yukio OSUMI1), Masao KAKAMI1), Tatsuo TSUKAMOTO1), Tsutomu TANAKA1), Kunihiko HIEI1), and Hisayoshi FUJIWARA1) Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are fre- quently used for the treatment for glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy because of their albumin- uria- or proteinuria-reducing effects. To many patients who are nonresponsive to monotherapy with these agents, combination therapy appears to be a good treatment option. In the present study, we examined the effects of the addition of an ARB (losartan) followed by titration upon addition and at 3 and 6 months (n=14) and the addition of an ACE-I followed by titration upon addition and at 3 and 6 months (n=20) to the drug regimen treatment protocol in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy for whom more than 3-month administration of an ACE-I or the combination of an ACE-I plus a conventional antihypertensive was inef- fective to achieve a blood pressure (BP) of 130/80 mmHg and to reduce urinary albumin to <30 mg/day. Dur- ing the 12-month treatment, addition of losartan or addition of an ACE-I to the treatment protocol reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 10% and 12%, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 7% and 4%, and urinary albumin excretion by 38% and 20% of the baseline value, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Manidipine and Delapril 30-10Mg-PIL (3.0)
    Package Leaflet: Information for the user ADAPTUS/DELAMAN 30 mg / 10 mg tablets Delapril hydrochloride / manidipine hydrochloride Read all of this leaflet carefully before you start taking this medicine because it contains important information for you. - Keep this leaflet. You may need to read it again. - If you have any further questions, ask your doctor or pharmacist. - This medicine has been prescribed for you only. Do not pass it on to others. It may harm them, even if their signs of illness are the same as yours. - If you get any side effects, talk to your doctor or pharmacist. This includes any possible side effects not listed in this leaflet. See section 4. What is in this leaflet 1. What Adaptus/Delaman is and what it is used for 2. What you need to know before you take Adaptus/Delaman 3. How to take Adaptus/Delaman 4. Possible side effects 5. How to store Adaptus/Delaman 6. Contents of the pack and other information 1. WHAT ADAPTUS/DELAMAN IS AND WHAT IT IS USED FOR Adaptus/Delaman is Adaptus/Delaman is a combination of two active substances, delapril hydrochloride and manidipine hydrochloride. Delapril hydrochloride belongs to a group of medicines known as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitor medicines). Angiotensin II is a substance produced in the body that causes the narrowing of blood vessels. This results in an increase in blood pressure. Delapril hydrochloride prevents the production of Angiotensin II and so causes a lowering of blood pressure. Manidipine hydrochloride is one of a group of medicines called calcium-channel blockers that blocks calcium flow into smooth muscle cells of the blood vessels causing the blood vessels to relax and a corresponding reduction in the blood pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy and Safety of Delapril/Indapamide Compared to Different ACE-Inhibitor/Hydrochlorothiazide Combinations: a Meta-Analysis
    International Journal of General Medicine Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article ORiginal RESEARCH Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis Maria Circelli1 Abstract: The main objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of the Gabriele Nicolini1 combination of delapril and indapamide (D+I) to different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibi- Colin G Egan2 tor (ACEi) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combinations for the treatment of mild-to-moderate Giovanni Cremonesi1 hypertension. A secondary objective was to examine the safety of these two combinations. Studies comparing the efficacy of +D I to ACEi+HCTZ combinations in hypertensive patients and pub- 1Chiesi Farmaceutici, Direzione Medica, Parma, Italy; 2Primula lished on computerized databases (1974–2010) were considered. Endpoints included percentage Multimedia, Pisa, Italy of normalized patients, of responders, change in diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP/SBP) at different time-points, percentage of adverse events (AEs), and percentage of withdrawal. Four head-to-head randomized controlled trials (D+I-treated, n = 643; ACEi+HCTZ-treated, n = 629) For personal use only. were included. Meta-analysis indicated that D+I-treated patients had a higher proportion with normalized blood pressure (P = 0.024) or responders (P = 0.002) compared to ACEi+HCTZ- treated patients. No difference was observed between treatments on absolute values of DBP and SBP at different time-points. Although the rate of patients reporting at least one AE was similar in both groups (10.4% versus 9.9%), events leading to study withdrawal were lower in the D+I group versus the ACEi+HCTZ group (2.3% versus 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.018).
    [Show full text]
  • Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play
    The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Executive Agency for Health and Consumers Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play 24 January 2012 Final Report Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play Acknowledgements Matrix Insight Ltd would like to thank everyone who has contributed to this research. We are especially grateful to the following institutions for their support throughout the study: the Pharmaceutical Group of the European Union (PGEU) including their national member associations in Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Poland and the United Kingdom; the European Medical Association (EMANET); the Observatoire Social Européen (OSE); and The Netherlands Institute for Health Service Research (NIVEL). For questions about the report, please contact Dr Gabriele Birnberg ([email protected] ). Matrix Insight | 24 January 2012 2 Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play Executive Summary This study has been carried out in the context of Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross- border healthcare (CBHC). The CBHC Directive stipulates that the European Commission shall adopt measures to facilitate the recognition of prescriptions issued in another Member State (Article 11). At the time of submission of this report, the European Commission was preparing an impact assessment with regards to these measures, designed to help implement Article 11.
    [Show full text]
  • “Captopril” [Mesh
    BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) Open Heart PubMed: 1. (“dose comparison” OR “dose” OR “low dose” OR “high dose” OR “dosage*”) 2. (“captopril” [mesh] OR “Benazepril” OR “Enalapril” [mesh] OR “Enalapril” OR “Cilazapril” [mesh] OR “Cilazapril” OR “Delapril” OR “Imidapril” OR “Lisinopril” [mesh] OR “Lisinopril” OR “Moexipril” OR “Perindopril” [mesh] OR “Perindopril” OR “Quinapril” OR “Ramipril” [mesh] “Ramipril” OR “Spirapril” OR “Temocapril” OR “Trandolapril” OR “Zofenopril” OR “Enalaprilat” [mesh] OR “Enalaprilat” OR “Fosinopril” [mesh] OR “Fosinopril” OR “Teprotide” [mesh] OR “Teprotide” OR “Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors” [mesh] OR “Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors” OR “Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors” OR “Inhibitors, Kininase II” OR “Kininase II Antagonists” OR “Kininase II Inhibitors” OR “Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors” OR “Angiotensin I Converting Enzyme Inhibitors” OR “Antagonists, Angiotensin- Converting Enzyme” OR “Antagonists, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme” OR “Antagonists, Kininase II” OR “Inhibitors, ACE” OR “ACE Inhibitors” OR “Inhibitors, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme” OR “Enzyme Inhibitors, Angiotensin-Converting” OR “Inhibitors, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme” OR “Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Antagonists” OR “Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Antagonists” OR “Enzyme Antagonists, Angiotensin-Converting”) 3. (“Heart failure” [mesh] OR “heart failure” OR “Cardiac Failure” OR “Heart Decompensation” OR “Decompensation, Heart” OR “Heart Failure, Right-Sided” OR “Heart Failure, Right Sided” OR “Right-Sided Heart Failure” OR “Right Sided Heart Failure” OR “Myocardial Failure” OR “Congestive Heart Failure” OR “Heart Failure, Congestive” OR “Heart Failure, Left-Sided” OR “Heart Failure, Left Sided” OR “Left-Sided Heart Failure” OR “Left Sided Heart Failure” OR “chronic heart failure” OR "chronic heart" OR (CHF)) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Drugs for Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: an Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Supplementary Online Content Karmali KN, Lloyd-Jones DM, Berendsen MA, et al. Drugs for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: an overview of systematic reviews. JAMA Cardiol. Published online April 27, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0218. eAppendix 1. Search Documentation Details eAppendix 2. Background, Methods, and Results of Systematic Review of Combination Drug Therapy to Evaluate for Potential Interaction of Effects eAppendix 3. PRISMA Flow Charts for Each Drug Class and Detailed Systematic Review Characteristics and Summary of Included Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses eAppendix 4. List of Excluded Studies and Reasons for Exclusion This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. 1 Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/28/2021 eAppendix 1. Search Documentation Details. Database Organizing body Purpose Pros Cons Cochrane Cochrane Library in Database of all available -Curated by the Cochrane -Content is limited to Database of the United Kingdom systematic reviews and Collaboration reviews completed Systematic (UK) protocols published by by the Cochrane Reviews the Cochrane -Only systematic reviews Collaboration Collaboration and systematic review protocols Database of National Health Collection of structured -Curated by Centre for -Only provides Abstracts of Services (NHS) abstracts and Reviews and Dissemination structured abstracts Reviews of Centre for Reviews bibliographic
    [Show full text]
  • Short‑ and Long‑Term Treatment with Angiotensin‑Converting Enzyme
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 21: 14, 2021 Short‑ and long‑term treatment with angiotensin‑converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium channel blockers for the prevention of diabetic nephropathy progression: A meta‑analysis JIALANG LIANG1*, JIARONG LAN2*, QIZHI TANG1, WENJING LING3 and MIN LI4 1Endocrinology Department, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Guangdong Province, Foshan, Guangdong 528200; 2Nephrology Department, Huzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000;3 Emergency Department, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Guangdong Province, Foshan, Guangdong 528200; 4Endocrinology Department, Huzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, P.R. China Received May 21, 2020; Accepted October 14, 2020 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.9446 Abstract. Treatments with angiotensin‑converting enzyme better outcomes with ACE inhibitors [odds ratio (OR), 0.70; (ACE) inhibitors or calcium channel blockers (CCBs) may 95% CI, 0.49‑1.00; P=0.05]. There was no statistically signifi‑ delay the development of albuminuria in patients with early cant difference between ACE inhibitors and CCBs regarding diabetic nephropathy. However, evidence in the literature the progression from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria has not been consistent. The present meta‑analysis aimed to (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.82‑3.87; P=0.15). In conclusion, the compare the short‑ and long‑term therapeutic effects of ACE present study indicated that the antiproteinuric efficacy of inhibitors and CCBs (when used separately) for preventing the CCBs may be less than that of ACE inhibitors after short‑term progression of nephropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus.
    [Show full text]
  • Potentiation of Antihypertensive Effect of Ace Inhibitors
    Europaisches Patentamt 19 European Patent Office Office europeen des brevets (fj) Publication number: 0 336 950 B1 EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION @ Date of publication of patent specification © int. ci.5 : A61 K 45/06, A61 K 37/64, 22.01.92 Bulletin 92/04 A61K 31/55, A61K 31/44, A61K 31/40 (21) Application number: 88909317.5 (22) Date of filing : 11.10.88 @ International application number: PCT/EP88/00909 @ International publication number: WO 89/03691 05.05.89 Gazette 89/10 (54) POTENTIATION OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFECT OF ACE INHIBITORS. The file contains technical information (§) References cited : submitted after the application was filed and US-A- 4 591 598 not included in this specification US-A- 4 600 534 US-A- 4 666 901 CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS, Vol. 107, no. 13, 28 (§) Priority: 19.10.87 US 109965 September 1987 (Columbus, Ohio, US) Bitter- man Haim et al.: "Potentiation of the protec- tive effects of inhibitor (43) Date of publication of application : a converting enzyme 18.10.89 Bulletin 89/42 and a tromboxane synthetase inhibitor in hemorrhagic shock", see page 44, abstract 109110q, & J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1987, (45) Publication of the grant of the patent : 242(1), 8-14 (Eng). 22.01.92 Bulletin 92/04 @ Proprietor : CIBA-GEIGY AG @ Designated Contracting States : Klybeckstrasse 141 AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE CH-4002 Basel (CH) (56) References cited : (72) Inventor : KSANDER, Gary, M. EP-A- 0 219 782 342 Woolf Road US-A- 4 473 575 Milford, NJ 08848 (US) US-A- 4 511 573 Inventor : ZIMMERMAN, Mark, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Manidipine and Delapril 30-10Mg-Smpc (3.0)
    SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT ADAPTUS/DELAMAN 30 mg + 10 mg tablets 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each tablet contains 30 mg of delapril hydrochloride and 10 mg of manidipine hydrochloride. Excipients with known effect: 67.60 mg lactose monohydrate/tablet 0.08 mg sunset yellow (E110) Aluminum lake/tablet For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Tablet. Salmon-pink, round, scored tablet. The tablet can be divided into equal doses 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Treatment of essential hypertension. ADAPTUS/DELAMAN fixed dose combination (30 mg /10 mg) is indicated in patients whose blood pressure is not adequately controlled on delapril or manidipine alone (see section 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 5.1) 4.2 Posology and method of administration Posology Dosage recommendations for adults The usual posology is one tablet of ADAPTUS/DELAMAN once a day. Individual dose titration with the components (delapril 30 mg and manidipine 10 mg) is recommended. If clinically acceptable, a direct switch from delapril or manidipine monotherapy to the fixed combination may be considered (see section 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 5.1). Special care should be exercised when ADAPTUS/DELAMAN is used in elderly patients and patients with renal failure or hepatic insufficiency and dose titration should be performed using the single components delapril and manidipine according to the following approach: Elderly patients: considering the possible impairment of renal function and the slowing down of metabolic processes in elderly patients; dose titration must be approached with caution.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Use of Medicines Affecting the Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) to Be Restricted – CHMP Endorses PRAC Recommendation EMA/294911/2014 Page 2/4
    23 May 2014 EMA/294911/2014 Combined use of medicines affecting the renin- angiotensin system (RAS) to be restricted – CHMP endorses PRAC recommendation The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has endorsed restrictions on combining different classes of medicines that act on the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), a hormone system that controls blood pressure and the volume of fluids in the body. These medicines (called RAS-acting agents) belong to three main classes: angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs, sometimes known as sartans), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE- inhibitors) and direct renin inhibitors such as aliskiren. Combination of medicines from any two of these classes is not recommended and, in particular, patients with diabetes-related kidney problems (diabetic nephropathy) should not be given an ARB with an ACE-inhibitor. Where combination of these medicines (dual blockade) is considered absolutely necessary, it must be carried out under specialist supervision with close monitoring of kidney function, fluid and salt balance and blood pressure. This would include the licensed use of the ARBs candesartan or valsartan as add- on therapy to ACE-inhibitors in patients with heart failure who require such a combination. The combination of aliskiren with an ARB or ACE-inhibitor is strictly contraindicated in those with kidney impairment or diabetes. The CHMP opinion confirms recommendations made by the Agency’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) in April 2014, following assessment of evidence from several large studies in patients with various pre-existing heart and circulatory disorders, or with type 2 diabetes. These studies found that combination of an ARB with an ACE-inhibitor was associated with an increased risk of hyperkalaemia (increased potassium in the blood), kidney damage or low blood pressure compared with using either medicine alone.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0005327 A1 GRANATA Et Al
    US 20090005327A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0005327 A1 GRANATA et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jan. 1, 2009 (54) ESSENTIAL, N-3 FATTY ACDS IN CARDAC continuation of application No. 10/451,623, filed on IN SUFFICIENCY AND HEART FAILURE Nov. 21, 2003, now abandoned, filed as application THERAPY No. PCT/EP02/00507 on Jan. 16, 2002. (75) Inventors: Francesco GRANATA, Milan (IT): (30) Foreign Application Priority Data Franco Pamparana, Milan (IT): Eduardo Stragliotto, Milan (IT) Jan. 25, 2001 (IT) .......................... MI2OO1 AOOO129 Correspondence Address: Publication Classification ARENT FOX LLP (51) Int. Cl. 1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N.W., SUITE A6II 3L/202 (2006.01) 400 A63L/704 (2006.01) WASHINGTON, DC 20036 (US) A6IP 9/10 (2006.01) (73) Assignee: PFIZER ITALIA S.R.L., Latina (52) U.S. Cl. ........................................... 514/34: 514/560 (IT) (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 12/207,068 The present invention concerns a method of therapeutic pre vention and treatment of a heart disease chosen from cardiac (22) Filed: Sep. 9, 2008 insufficiency and heart failure including the administration of an essential fatty acid containing a mixture of eicosapen Related U.S. Application Data taenoic acid ethyl ester (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (63) Continuation of application No. 1 1/333.387, filed on ethyl ester (DHA), either alone or in combination with Jan. 17, 2006, now Pat. No. 7,439,267, which is a another therapeutic agent. US 2009/0005327 A1 Jan. 1, 2009 ESSENTIALN-3 FATTY ACDS IN CARDAC tensin Converting Enzymes inhibitors), diuretics, non-digi IN SUFFICIENCY AND HEART FAILURE talis positive inotropic drugs such as adrenergics and THERAPY inhibitors of phosphodiesterase, arteriolar and venular vasodilators, e.g.
    [Show full text]