DOCSLIB.ORG

Anticipatory Self-Defense in International Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anticipatory Self-Defense in International Law Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid Universiteit Gent Academiejaar 2011-12 Han Shot First: Anticipatory Self-defense in International Law Masterproef van de opleiding ‘Master in de rechten’ Ingediend door Sam Van den Bosch (studentennr. 00600299) (major: Nationaal en Internationaal Publiekrecht) Promotor: Prof. dr. Eduard Somers Commissaris: ………….. Anticipatory Self-defense in International Law Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 Goals................................................................................................................................................1 Methods and structure......................................................................................................................1 Conclusions......................................................................................................................................3 1 Notes on Language...........................................................................................................................4 1.1 Situating anticipatory self-defense............................................................................................4 1.2 Defining anticipatory Self-Defense..........................................................................................8 2 The Great Debate............................................................................................................................11 2.1 Overview.................................................................................................................................11 2.2 The restrictionists....................................................................................................................14 2.2.1 The Charter and the customary international law on self-defense..................................15 2.2.2 Customary international law and anticipatory self-defense............................................18 2.2.3 Subsidiary criticisms of restrictionism............................................................................19 2.3 The abolitionists......................................................................................................................23 2.3.1 Weakness of the two-tiered UN Charter-system.............................................................23 2.3.2 Post War Practice as a substitute for or amendment to the UN Charter-system.............25 2.3.3 Selected cases of state practice.......................................................................................25 2.3.4 Assessment of the abolitionist school.............................................................................27 2.4 The counter-restrictionists......................................................................................................28 3 Historical Evolution of the Right of Self-defense and Anticipatory Self-defense.........................30 3.1 Historical Development of the ius ad bellum prior to the First World War............................30 3.1.1 Stage 1: Romans..............................................................................................................30 3.1.2 Stage 2: Christian Theology and secularisation of the bellum justum...........................32 3.1.3 Stage 3: Post-Westphalian freedom to war and Caroline................................................34 3.2 The Caroline Incident.............................................................................................................36 3.2.1 Importance......................................................................................................................36 3.2.2 Historical events..............................................................................................................37 3.3 Self-defense in the interwar-period.........................................................................................41 3.3.1 The League of Nations....................................................................................................42 The Covenant of the League of Nations – the Treaty of the Gaps.......................................43 The Covenant and Self-defense............................................................................................45 3.3.2 The Kellogg-Briand Pact.................................................................................................46 Reservations, War and Self-defense.....................................................................................48 i State-practice and the judgments at Nuremberg...................................................................51 Nuremberg and Tokyo..........................................................................................................53 3.4 The Charter of the United Nations..........................................................................................56 3.5 Conclusion on the Existence of a Right of Anticipatory Self-defense at the adoption of the Charter of the United Nations........................................................................................................60 4 Dimensions of Anticipatory Self-defense ......................................................................................62 4.1 Use of force and armed attack: ..............................................................................................64 4.1.1 The Nicaragua-case.........................................................................................................64 4.1.2 Cyber-attacks as armed attacks.......................................................................................66 4.2 Imminence, necessity and proportionality..............................................................................68 4.2.1 Necessity.........................................................................................................................68 4.2.2 Proportionality................................................................................................................69 4.2.3 Imminence.......................................................................................................................71 4.2.4 Immediacy.......................................................................................................................72 5 Anticipatory self-defense and non-state actors...............................................................................73 5.1 State responsibility and territorial sovereignty.......................................................................75 5.1.1 State responsibility..........................................................................................................75 Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo-case..........................................................75 5.1.2 Territorial sovereignty.....................................................................................................78 5.2 Self-defense vis-à-vis non-state actors...................................................................................81 5.2.1 Imminence, necessity and proportionality and non-state actors.....................................83 5.2.2 How to apply the law......................................................................................................85 5.3 Application of the law to the reported conduct of drone-warfare...........................................87 5.3.1 What “drones” are, what they are not, and why they are used........................................87 5.3.2 The use of drones in the war on terror............................................................................87 6 Self-defense and Weapons of Mass-destruction.............................................................................91 6.1 First Report of the Atomic Energy Commission.....................................................................93 6.2 2002 National Security Strategy.............................................................................................94 6.3 2003 Gulf War.......................................................................................................................100 6.4 Israeli counter-proliferation operations in 1981, 2007 and possible action against Iran......109 6.4.1 1981: Iraq......................................................................................................................109 6.4.2 2007: Syria....................................................................................................................112 6.4.3 TBD: Iran......................................................................................................................114 Current legal regime...........................................................................................................114 An existential threat............................................................................................................115 Nuclear balance..................................................................................................................117 ii The window of opportunity before the zone of immunity.................................................120 Conclusion........................................................................................................................................122 Bibliography.....................................................................................................................................125 Treaties.........................................................................................................................................125
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Sony Hack and the Role of International Law
    The 2014 Sony Hack and the Role of International Law Clare Sullivan* INTRODUCTION 2014 has been dubbed “the year of the hack” because of the number of hacks reported by the U.S. federal government and major U.S. corporations in busi- nesses ranging from retail to banking and communications. According to one report there were 1,541 incidents resulting in the breach of 1,023,108,267 records, a 78 percent increase in the number of personal data records compro- mised compared to 2013.1 However, the 2014 hack of Sony Pictures Entertain- ment Inc. (Sony) was unique in nature and in the way it was orchestrated and its effects. Based in Culver City, California, Sony is the movie making and entertain- ment unit of Sony Corporation of America,2 the U.S. arm of Japanese electron- ics company Sony Corporation.3 The hack, discovered in November 2014, did not follow the usual pattern of hackers attempting illicit activities against a business. It did not specifically target credit card and banking information, nor did the hackers appear to have the usual motive of personal financial gain. The nature of the wrong and the harm inflicted was more wide ranging and their motivation was apparently ideological. Identifying the source and nature of the wrong and harm is crucial for the allocation of legal consequences. Analysis of the wrong and the harm show that the 2014 Sony hack4 was more than a breach of privacy and a criminal act. If, as the United States maintains, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (herein- after North Korea) was behind the Sony hack, the incident is governed by international law.
    [Show full text]
  • Université Du Québec Thèse Présentée À L'université Du
    UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC THÈSE PRÉSENTÉE À L'UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS-RIVIÈRES COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE DU DOCTORAT EN ÉTUDES QUÉBÉCOISES PAR SIMON COUILLARD LE DISCOURS SUR L'IDENTITÉ DU CANADA COMME UNE SEULE NATION DANS L'HISTORIOGRAPHIE CANADIENNE-ANGLAISE, DU MILIEU DU XIXE SIÈCLE À NOS JOURS DÉCEMBRE 2018 Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières Service de la bibliothèque Avertissement L’auteur de ce mémoire ou de cette thèse a autorisé l’Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières à diffuser, à des fins non lucratives, une copie de son mémoire ou de sa thèse. Cette diffusion n’entraîne pas une renonciation de la part de l’auteur à ses droits de propriété intellectuelle, incluant le droit d’auteur, sur ce mémoire ou cette thèse. Notamment, la reproduction ou la publication de la totalité ou d’une partie importante de ce mémoire ou de cette thèse requiert son autorisation. 2 RÉSUMÉ Cette thèse a pour objet le discours sur l'identité du Canada comme une seule nation tel que l' ont élaboré depuis le milieu du XIXe siècle dix historiens majeurs du Canada anglais. Nous y analysons les éléments narratifs et discursifs mobilisés dans les différents récits des Rébellions déployés dans les synthèses d'histoire nationale que ces historiens ont écrites. Il s'agit d'une étude sur le temps long qui s'intéresse aux constantes de ce discours et à ses changements au fil des différentes périodes de l'historiographie canadienne-anglaise. Une attention particulière est donnée à la manière dont ce discours identitaire s'articule par opposition à la représentation qui est brossée du fait français et des Canadiens français.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Location in the World System: Reworking
    CANADA’S LOCATION IN THE WORLD SYSTEM: REWORKING THE DEBATE IN CANADIAN POLITICAL ECONOMY by WILLIAM BURGESS BA (Hon.), Queens University, 1978 MA (Plan.), University of British Columbia, 1995 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Geography We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA January 2002 © William Burgess, 2002 Abstract Canada is more accurately described as an independent imperialist country than a relatively dependent or foreign-dominated country. This conclusion is reached by examining recent empirical evidence on the extent of inward and outward foreign investment, ownership links between large financial corporations and large industrial corporations, and the size and composition of manufacturing production and trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Defense Without Imminence
    ARTICLES SELF-DEFENSE WITHOUT IMMINENCE Fritz Allhoff* ABSTRACT The doctrine of self-defense allows that otherwise criminal force can be justi®ed so long as the actor reasonably believes its use necessary to protect against imminent and unlawful attack. Supposing that the force is necessary to dispel the attack, why the further requirement that the attack is imminent? The restriction precludes the use of force which, ex hypothesi, is the only way that the actor could defend himself. This Article surveys and critiques the rationale for the imminence requirement, arguing that it should be jettisoned in favor of a more expansive conception of self-defense. While the focus is on domestic law, the paper concludes by gesturing towards implications for international law as well, particularly with regards to preventive war (i.e., war against non-imminent threats). I. IMMINENCE AND NECESSITY Self-defense has long been taken to justify an otherwise illicit use of force. William Blackstone, characterizing the eighteenth-century common law of England, provided: [I]f the party himself, or any of these his relations, be forcibly attacked in his person or property, it is lawful for him to repel force by force; and the breach of the peace, which happens, is chargeable upon him only who began the affray. For the law, in this case, respects the passions of the human mind; and ... makes it lawful in him to do himself that immediate justice, to which he is prompted by nature, and which no prudential motives are strong enough to restrain. It considers that the future process of law is by no means an adequate remedy for injuries accompanied with force; since it is impossible to say, to * Fritz Allhoff, J.D., Ph.D., is a Professor in the Department of Philosophy at Western Michigan University.
    [Show full text]
  • International Law and the Pre-Emptive Use of Force: Afghanistan, Al-Qaida, and Iraq
    International Law and the Pre-emptive Use of Force: Afghanistan, Al-Qaida, and Iraq CHRISTOPHER GREENWOOD* TABLE OF CONTENTS, I. INTRODUCTION ............... .......... .................................. 8 II. THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF THE USE OF FORCE IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ......................................................................... 10 A . Self-D efense ................................................................................................ I I 1. Self-Defense Against ThreatenedAttacks ....................................... 12 2. Self-Defense Against Threatsfrom Terrorists................................ 16 B. Collective Security ................................................................................ 18 1. Collective Security and Pre-emptive Action .................................. 19 2. Collective Security and Terrorism................................................ 19 III. THE USE OF FORCE AGAINST INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM .............................. 21 IV . IR AQ .....................................................................................................................2 6 A. The Security Council Resolutions on Iraq ........................................... 26 B. The Legality of MilitaryAction Against Iraq ....................................... 33 V . C ONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................... 36 * CMG, QC; Professor of International Law, London School of Economics and Political Science. The author acknowledges with
    [Show full text]
  • Monopoly & King
    A READER THE LIBERTARIANISM.ORG READER SERIES INTRODUCES THE MAJOR IDEAS AND THINKERS IN THE LIBERTARIAN TRADITION. Who Makes & King Mob Monopoly History Happen? From the ancient origins of their craft, historians have used their work to defend established and powerful interests and regimes. In the modern period, though, historians have emphasized the agency and impact of everyday, average people—common people—without access to conventional political power. Monopoly & King Mob provides readers with dozens of documents from the Early Modern and Modern periods to suggest that the best history is that which accounts for change both “from above” and “from below” in the social hierarchy. When we think of history as the grand timeline of states, politicians, military leaders, great business leaders, and elite philosophers, we skew our view of the world and our ideas about how it works. ANTHONY COMEGNA is the Assistant Editor for Intellectual History at Anthony Comegna Anthony Libertarianism.org and the Cato Institute. He received an MA (2012) and PhD (2016) in Atlantic and American history from the University of Pittsburgh. He produces historical content for Libertarianism.org regularly and is writer/ host of the Liberty Chronicles podcast. $12.95 DESIGN BY: SPENCER FULLER, FACEOUT STUDIO COVER IMAGE: THINKSTOCK Monopoly and King Mob Edited by Anthony Comegna CATO INSTITUTE WASHINGTON, D.C. 109318_FM_R2.indd 3 7/24/18 10:47 AM Copyright © 2018 by the Cato Institute. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-944424-56-5 eISBN: 978-1-944424-57-2 Printed in Canada. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data available. 109318_FM_R4.indd 4 25/07/2018 11:38 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: AMERICAN HISTORY, ABOVE AND BELOW .
    [Show full text]
  • OHS Bulletin, on the OHS Promote, and Celebrate Achieve- Twitter (@Ontariohistory) and President’S Report
    OHS B ULLETIN THE NEWSLETTER OF THE ONTARIO HISTORICAL SOCIETY I ss UE 188 S UMMER 2013 OHS Welcomes New OHS to Launch Online Project Affiliated Member: Kensington to Strengthen Ontario’s Market Historical Society Heritage Community n November 2012, the OHS Alison Little, Program Manager will be the goal of a series of Iincorporated Toronto-based [email protected] webinars, which will present valu- Kensington Market Historical able information on topics directly Society (KMHS), continuing in ince 1888, The Ontario relevant to heritage institutions its mission to empower historical SHistorical Society has sought and organizations in Ontario. Each societies across Ontario to save new ways to reach out to its webinar will be led by industry their local history. members, partners, and friends professionals with ample time for The objectives and interests in the heritage community. 125 participant questions, and will also of the KMHS are to collect and years later, the OHS plans to be made available for viewing disseminate knowledge pertain- develop a web portal, map, and afterwards through the OHS website. ing to the cultural, historical, and webinar series for artistic context of Kensington an increasingly Do you have a webinar idea? Market’s past. The organization diverse audience. Tell us what you’d like to see! intends to initiate primary research Beginning in fall Email [email protected] using documentary records and 2013, the “Strength- oral histories related to the neigh- Photo Ronny Jaques ening Ontario’s to make suggestions and take bourhood. Opportunities for Street view of Toronto’s Kensington Heritage Network” part in our webinar survey! collaborative projects, such as Market, circa 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • To Excite the Feelings of Noble Patriots:” Emotion, Public Gatherings, and Mackenzie’S
    A Dissertation entitled “To Excite the Feelings of Noble Patriots:” Emotion, Public Gatherings, and Mackenzie’s American Rebellion, 1837-1842 by Joshua M. Steedman Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy History ___________________________________________ Dr. Ami Pflugrad-Jackisch, Committee Chair ___________________________________________ Dr. Kim Nielsen, Committee Member ___________________________________________ Dr. Roberto Padilla II, Committee Member ___________________________________________ Dr. Rebecca Mancuso, Committee Member ___________________________________________ Dr. Cyndee Gruden, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo August 2019 Copyright 2019, Joshua M. Steedman This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of “To Excite the Feelings of Noble Patriots:” Emotion, Public Gatherings, and Mackenzie’s American Rebellion, 1837-1842 by Joshua M. Steedman Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in History The University of Toledo August 2019 This dissertation is a cultural history of the American reaction to the Upper Canadian Rebellion and the Patriot War. This project is based on an analysis of newspaper articles published by William Lyon Mackenzie and his contemporaries, diplomatic cables between Washington D.C. and London, letters, and accounts of celebrations, toasts, and public meetings which occurred between 1837 and 1842. I argue Americans and Upper Canadians in the Great Lakes region made up a culture area. By re-engaging in a battle with the British, Upper Canadians, and their American supporters sought redemption. Reacting to geographic isolation from major metropolitan areas and a looming psychic crisis motivated many of these individuals to act.
    [Show full text]
  • Legality, Legitimacy and Anticipatory Self-Defense: Considering an Israeli Preemptive Strike on Iran's Nuclear Program
    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 38 Number 1 Article 7 Fall 2012 Legality, Legitimacy and Anticipatory Self-Defense: Considering an Israeli Preemptive Strike on Iran's Nuclear Program Katherine Slager Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Recommended Citation Katherine Slager, Legality, Legitimacy and Anticipatory Self-Defense: Considering an Israeli Preemptive Strike on Iran's Nuclear Program, 38 N.C. J. INT'L L. 267 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol38/iss1/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Legality, Legitimacy and Anticipatory Self-Defense: Considering an Israeli Preemptive Strike on Iran's Nuclear Program Cover Page Footnote International Law; Commercial Law; Law This note is available in North Carolina Journal of International Law: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol38/iss1/ 7 Legality, Legitimacy and Anticipatory Self-Defense: Considering an Israeli Preemptive Strike on Iran's Nuclear Program KATHERINE SLAGERt "And self-defence is Nature's eldest law. "' ... the right of every sovereign state to protect itself by preventing a condition of affairs in which it will be too late to protect itself "2 I. Introduction ........................... ..... 268 II. International Law and the Use of Force in Self-Defense ..270 A. The Road to Modem International Law and the Use of Force .................................... 270 B. Self-Defense................... .............. 273 1. Customary International Law .......
    [Show full text]
  • The Doctrine of Preemptive Self-Defense
    Volume 50 Issue 3 Article 9 2005 The Doctrine of Preemptive Self-Defense Sean D. Murphy Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Sean D. Murphy, The Doctrine of Preemptive Self-Defense, 50 Vill. L. Rev. 699 (2005). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol50/iss3/9 This Symposia is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Review by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Murphy: The Doctrine of Preemptive Self-Defense 20051 THE DOCTRINE OF PREEMPTIVE SELF-DEFENSE SEAN D. MURPHY* I. INTRODUCTION N enduring reality demonstrated by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 is that non-state actors are capable of projecting extreme violence across the globe. The September 11 attackers were a variety of individuals who were trained and recruited across multiple states, who were instructed and funded by a loose but sophisticated Al Qaeda net- work, and who then surreptitiously acquired the means to unleash a vi- cious attack that within a matter of hours killed more than three thousand 1 people, mostly civilians. This ability of non-state actors to project force across the globe is par- ticularly troubling in the context of their potential use of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Although governments have possessed WMD for many decades, such weapons have rarely been used, largely because of the understanding by states that the use of WMD against another state would almost certainly lead to general, worldwide condemnation and possibly a response in kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Forcible Self-Help in International
    139 FORCIBLE SELF-HELP IN INTERNATIONAL LAW James J- McHugh INTRODUCTION rent milieu in the United States, we have wi tnessed discussions on the The Problcm of Force in Intcrna­ morality of capital punishment and the tional Relations_ The proper use of legitimacy of measures of private coer­ force has historically been a preeminent cion such as sit-ins and mass demonstra­ concern of mankind. In the domestic tions. environment the progress of centuries If domestic societies can still debate has evidenced the development of a the appropriate application of force highly structured order for the appropri­ internally, how much more difficult is ate application of this means of coer­ the solution of problems surrounding cion. Societies, bound together by com­ the use of force in the international mon heritage and a community of community. V{ith a multiplicity of interest, have, under the central au­ sovereign nation-states prosecuting their thority of the state, developed regula­ separate national interests and with no tions for the use of force covering a central authority to manage the expres­ broad spectrum of situational hypothe­ sion of these frequen tly competing in­ ses. terests, it is perhaps a testament to the But even in domestic society, signifi­ basic rationality of the human species cant deb~te has arisen as to the proper that man has not long since destroyed application oC force. Thus, in the cur- himself. 140 And yet he has not. Through centu­ apocalypse of thermonuclear power ries of cataclysm and accommodation, have kept leashed the dogs of world states have managed, although some­ war.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Claims of a New Doctrine of Pre-Emptive War Under the Doctrine of Sources." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 43.1/2 (2005) : 67-103
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Volume 43, Number 1/2 (Spring/Summer 2005) Third World Approaches to International Law After 9/ Article 4 11 Guest Editor: Obiora Okafor Assessing Claims of a New Doctrine of Pre- Emptive War under the Doctrine of Sources James Thuo Gathii Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Part of the International Law Commons Special Issue Article Citation Information Gathii, James Thuo. "Assessing Claims of a New Doctrine of Pre-Emptive War under the Doctrine of Sources." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 43.1/2 (2005) : 67-103. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol43/iss1/4 This Special Issue Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Assessing Claims of a New Doctrine of Pre-Emptive War under the Doctrine of Sources Abstract After examining state practice and opinio juris on the preemptive use of force in the last few years, I conclude that the prohibition of preemptive war where there is no armed attack or an instant, overwhelming threat has not changed. Under customary international law, this prohibition of preemptive use of force is a customary international law norm of extremely high normativity and as such state practice inconsistent confirms the norm particularly in the absence of evidence of its widespread and representative repudiation. Second, under the doctrine of sources, state practice inconsistent with a norm of customary international law or persistent dissension from it, does not establish a new norm but is instead regarded a violation of the norm.
    [Show full text]