State of Maine's Beaches in 2017 Presenation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State of Maine's Beaches in 2017 Presenation State of Maine’s Beaches in 2017 Peter Slovinsky, Maine Geological Survey Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry Image from Higgins Beach volunteers State of Maine Beach Profiling Program (SMBPP) • Started in 1999 (MGS, MCP, MSG, MCE) • Trained volunteers from beach communities • Uses Emery (1961) method of beach profiling to collect cross- shore data • Collects monthly “qualitative” datasets, accuracy of typically 1-2 feet or less • Data is uploaded to the Maine Shore Stewards website where it can be plotted or downloaded • Used to track nourishment, impacts of storms, seasonal changes Maine Beach Mapping Program (MBMAP) • Started in 2005 • Real Time Kinematic Global Positioning System (RTK-GPS) • Accuracy of 1-2 inches • Annual measurements (sometimes more often) of alongshore features, such as the seaward extent of dominant sand dune vegetation (or wall) • Complements SMBPP datasets • Used to track nourishment and dune restoration, monitor erosion, impacts of storms ME’s Monitoring Programs State of Maine Beach Profiling: 10 beaches in 8 communities 29 different profile sites Data from 2010-2017 (winter) Data from 2010-2016 (summer) Maine Beach Mapping: 35 beach sections in 14 communities Data from 2010 – 2016 (summer) Factors Influencing the Beaches: Sea Level Rise Factors Influencing the Beaches: Sea Level Rise Factors Influencing the Beaches: Storms High Waves High Waves High Waves Consistent Waves Lower Waves Lower Waves Low Waves Five of the highest monthly sea levels since 1912 occurred in winter 2010 Higgins Beach, Scarborough, April 7, 2010 P.A. Slovinsky 2017 State of Maine’s Beaches Report The “Scoring” Methodology Due to time, beaches to be reviewed today… • Wells Beach, Wells (SMBPP/MBMAP) • Laudholm Beach (MBMAP) • Goochs Beach, Kennebunk (SMBPP/MBMAP) • Goose Rocks Beach, Kennebunkport (SMBPP/MBMAP) • Saco Beaches, Saco (SMBPP/MBMAP) • Higgins Beach, Scarborough (SMBPP/MBMAP) • Popham Beach Complex, Phippsburg (MBMAP) Popham Beach, S.M. Dickson (B-, C+) (D, D) (C+, C) (C, B-) Good stability to Relatively consistent dune and growth berm erosion Stable (due to bedrock) Average = C Winter Score = D • Generally no berm • Highest in 2010 • Relatively consistent dune and beach erosion Summer Score = D • Variable berm, highest in 2015 • Variable nearshore • Dune and berm erosion Somewhat Accretive (B-), +1.2 ft/yr (σ = 1.8) Slightly Accretive (C+), +0.7 ft/yr (σ = 1.8) Stable (C), +0.5 ft/yr (σ = 3.8) Slightly Accretive (C+), +0.7 ft/yr (σ = 2.4) Stable to Slightly Erosive (C-) -0.7 ft/yr (σ = 0.6) Highly Erosive (F+), -3.9 ft/yr (σ = 2.5) Very Erosive (D-), -2.6 ft/yr (σ = 2.7) (D, D) (C, C) (D, C) Most erosive (C-, C) Most stable Relatively stable; cobble Average = C- Winter Score = D • Generally no berm • Losing sand at wall • Highest in 2014 • Lowest in 2017 Summer Score = D • No berm • Highest in 2013 • Consistently eroding • Recovering less each summer Slightly Erosive (C-), -0.8 ft/yr (σ = 1.6) (B, B-) (B-, C) (B, B) (C) High dune growth, variable Stable, dune growth, berm and nearshore variable berms Winter Score = B • Higher than in summer • Variable low-tide terrace • Consistent dune growth Summer Score = B • Variable berm • Variable low-tide terrace • Consistent dune growth West Central East Little River Batson River River Batson Batson River = Extremely Erosive (-18 ft/yr, σ=7.7) West = Very Highly Accretive (+4.8 ft/yr, σ=4.6) Central = Slightly Accretive (+0.8 ft/yr, σ=1.8) East = Very Highly Accretive (+5.2 ft/yr, σ=2.5) Little River = Very Highly Accretive (+4.3 ft/yr, σ=1.9) Average = Accretive (+2.0 ft/yr, σ=6.6) FE01 = (F, C-) KS02 = (B-, C) FE02 = (D+, C) FE03 = (C-, C-) Stability to FE04 = (D, F) dune growth Relatively consistent dune and beach erosion Average = D+ Average = C+ Winter Score = D • Consistent landward movement of berm and dune • Slight dune growth Summer Score = F • Consistent landward movement of dune and berm Winter Score = B- • Stable to slightly growing dune • Variable but relatively stable berm Summer Score = C • Relatively stable dune • Relatively stable berm Somewhat Accretive (B-) +1.2 ft/yr (σ = 1.2) Very Erosive (D-), -2.5ft/yr (σ = 2.0) Accretive (B), +1.7 ft/yr (σ = 2.4) Stable to Slightly Erosive (C-), -0.5 ft/yr (σ = 2.8) (B,C+) (C+,C) (D,D) Average = C Winter Score = D • Massive beach and dune erosion • Highly variable dunes • Erosive trend Summer Score = D • Highly variable • Massive dune erosion • Growing trend after 2012 lows Extremely Erosive (F-), -14.1 ft/yr (σ = 4.6) Somewhat Erosive (D+) -1.1 ft/yr (σ = 1.0) Extremely Erosive (F), -10.9 ft/yr (σ = 6.8) Extremely Erosive (F) Erosive (D) -8.6 ft/yr (σ = 4.1) -2.1 ft/yr (σ = 4.9) Extremely Erosive (F), -7.6 ft/yr (σ = 6.6) Very Highly Accretive (A), +6.4 ft/yr (σ = 5.8) Stable (C) +0.1 ft/yr (σ = 4.4) Erosive (D), -1.7 ft/yr (σ = 7.9) Overall SMBPP Scores 2 of 10 (20%) scored a B, showing growth since 2010 5 of 10 (50%) scored a C or C+, showing stability since 2010. 2 of 10 (20%) scored a C or C-, showing slight or higher erosion since 2010. 1 of 10 (10%) scored a D, showing high continued erosion since 2010. Overall MBMAP Scores 71 % of beaches were stable to accretive 29% of beaches were slightly erosive to extremely erosive Summary • 71% of monitored beaches were generally stable to accreting from 2010 to 2016. • 29% of monitored beaches were somewhat to extremely erosive from 2010 to 2016. • Decreased sea levels (2014-2016) and less stormy winters (2016, 2017), along with storms hitting at lower tides combined with colder, snowy conditions helped stabilize the beaches. • Some beaches near tidal inlets had some of the highest erosion rates (Batson River at Goose Rocks Beach, Spurwink River at Higgins Beach) and some of the highest accretion rates (Kennebec River at Riverside Beach). How can the public access this information? Image from Goochs Beach volunteers Beach Profile Database HI02 8/01/2014 5/31/2015 http://www.mainecoastdata.org/reports/BeachProfileGraph.aspx Beach Profile Database http://www.mainecoastdata.org/reports/BeachProfileGraph.aspx The Beaches Report: State of Maine’s Beaches in 2017 Image from East Grand Beach volunteers http://www.maine.gov/dacf/mgs/explore/marine/beaches17/contents.htm Maine Beach Mapping Program: Online Viewer Data from 2005 through 2016 (updated annually in the fall) http://www.maine.gov/dacf/mgs/hazards/beach_mapping/index.shtml Dry Beach: Coming to a Beach Near you in Fall 2017! Wide Dry Beach Narrow Dry Beach Thank you: Volunteers ! With additional financial support from participating coastal communities. .
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of the Portland [15-Minute] Quadrangle, Maine
    / Maine Geological Survey To Accompany Map GM-1. GEOLOGIC 11AP OF THE PORTLAND QUADRANGLE, !1aine by Arthur M. Hussey, II STRATIGRAPHY MERRIMACK GROUP. In Southwestern Maine the Merrimack Group consists of, in ascending stratigraphic order, the Kittery, Eliot, and Berwick Formations. The Formations are dominantly an assemblage of interbedded quartzo- f eldspathic schists or phyllites and calcareous metaquartzite and granu­ lite with minor metapelite and calcareous metapelite. In the Portland quadrangle the Group is represented by the Berwick and Windham Formations, the latter being a new stratigraphic name proposed here for the first time, and tentatively correlated with the Eliot Formation. These two formations crop out over much of the northwestern half of the quadrangle. Ben1ick Formation(DSb). The Berwick Formation has been mapped from the type locality in the Salmon Falls River in Berwick, Maine, northeast into the Portland Quadrangle. Katz (1917) proposed the name Berwick Gneiss for this formation, and because he felt these rocks were more metamorphosed than surrounding rocks, he regarded them to be of Precambrian age. Freedman (1950) renamed the unit the Berwick Formation because of variability of texture and structure of the rock and alternation of lithic types. He clearly pointed out the probable Paleozoic age of the unit. The principal part of the Formation (DSb) consists of thin-to medium­ bedded, occasionally massive, biotite quartzite and quartz-biotite schist containing variable amounts of plagioclase. Locally interbedded with these rock types is quartz-biotite-muscovite schist with very rare garnet and staurolite. Thin calc-silicate beds and pods up to 6" thick, containing hornblende, and occasionally diopside and grossularite, occur sporadically throughout the section, but only locally constitute more than 15% of the sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonpoint Source Priority Watersheds List MARINE WATERS
    Maine Department of Environmental Protection February 2019 Nonpoint Source Priority Watersheds List MARINE WATERS Impaired* Marine Waters Priority List (34 marine waters) Marine Water Area/Town Priority List Reasoning Anthoine Creek & Cove South Portland Negative Water Quality Indicators (FOCB) Broad Cove Cushing DMR/NPS Threat Bunganuc Creek Brunswick CBEP Priority Water Cape Neddick River York MS4 Priority Water Churches Rock So. Thomaston DMR/NPS Threat Egypt Bay Hancock/Franklin DMR/NPS Threat Goosefare Bay Kennebunkport MHB Priority Water, MS4 Priority Water Harpswell Cove Brunswick CBEP Priority Water Harraseeket River Freeport DMR/NPS Threat Hutchins Cove Bagaduce River / DMR/NPS Threat Northern Bay (Penobscot) Hyler Cove Cushing DMR/NPS Threat Kennebunk River Kennebunk MHB Priority Water Little River and Bay Freeport CBEP Priority Water Littlefield Cove Bagaduce River / DMR/NPS Threat Northern Bay (Penobscot) Maquoit Bay Brunswick CBEP Priority Water Martin Cove Lamoine DMR/NPS Threat Medomak River Estuary Waldoboro DMR/NPS Threat Mill Cove South Portland Negative Water Quality Indicators Mill Pond/Parker Head Phippsburg DMR/NPS Threat Mussell Cove Falmouth CBEP Priority Water, DMR/NPS Threat North Fogg Point Freeport CBEP Priority Water Northeast Creek Bar Harbor DMR/NPS Threat Oakhurst Island Harpswell CBEP Priority Water Ogunquit River Estuary Ogunquit MHB Priority Water, DMR/NPS Threat Pemaquid River Bristol DMR/NPS Threat Salt Pond Blue Hill/Sedgwick DMR/NPS Threat, MERI Scarborough River Estuary Scarborough DMR/NPS Threat Spinney Creek Eliot MS4 Priority Water, Negative Water Quality Indicators Spruce Creek Kittery MS4 Priority Water, Negative Water Quality Indicators Page 1 of 2 MDEP NPS Priority Watersheds List – MARINE WATERS February 2019 Marine Water Area/Town Priority List Reasoning Spurwink River Scarborough MHB Priority Water, DMR/NPS Threat St.
    [Show full text]
  • Ibastoryspring08.Pdf
    irds find Maine attractive for many of the same reasons we do—the state offers a unique blend of landscapes spanning from mountains to the sea, with forests, grasslands, rivers, marshes, and long coastlines in between. B Where we find beautiful places to hike and kayak, camp and relax, birds find the habitat they need for their survival. But while Maine’s diverse habitats serve an important role for over IBAs 400 bird species—some threatened, endangered, or of regional conservation in concern—the state’s not immune to a growing list of threats that puts these birds at further risk. Habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation due to development, toxins such as mercury and lead, oil spills on the coast and Maine inland waters, and climate change are top among them. BY ANDREW COLVIN In the face of these threats, a crucial step in conserving Maine’s birds is to identify the areas of the state that are most important for breeding, wintering, and migration. After several years of working toward that goal, Maine Audubon Lists Maine Audubon has recently completed the first phase of its Important 22 of the Most Important Bird Areas (IBA) program, identifying 22 areas across Maine that are vital Places in Maine for Vulnerable Birds to state—and even global—bird populations. HANS TOOM ERIC HYNES Eight of the rare birds used to identify IBAs in Maine (clockwise from left): Short-eared owl, black-throated blue warbler, least tern, common moorhen, scarlet tanager, harlequin duck, saltmarsh sharp-tailed sparrow, and razorbill. MIKE FAHEY Important
    [Show full text]
  • POLICY of MAINE, 1620-1820 by MARGARET FOWLES WILDE a THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree
    HISTORY OF THE PUBLIC LAND POLICY OF MAINE, 1620-1820 By MARGARET FOWLES WILDE % A., University of Maine, 1932 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History and Government) Division of Graduate Study University of Maine Orono May, 1940 ABSTRACT HISTORY OF THE PUBLIC LAND POLICY OF MAINE, 1620-1820 There have been many accounts of individual settlements in Maine and a few histories of the State, but no one has ever attempted a history of its land policy or analyzed the effect that such a policy or lack of policy might have had on the development of the State of Maine. Maine was one of the earliest sections of the Atlantic Coast 'to be explored but one of the slowest in development. The latter may have been due to a number of factors but undoubtedly the lack of a definite, well developed land policy had much to do with the slow progress of settlement and development of this area. The years 1602 to 1620 marked the beginnings of explorations along the Maine Coast principally by the English and French. In 1603, Henry IV of France granted all the American territory between the fortieth and forty-six degrees north latitude to Pierre de Gast Sieure de Monts. This territory was called Acadia. Soon after, in 1606 King James I of England granted all the lands between the thirty-fourth and forty-fifth degrees north latitude to an association of noblemen of London and Plymouth. Later, King James I of England granted all the lands from the fortieth to the forty-eighth degrees of north latitude to a company called ’’Council established at Plymouth in the County of Devon; for planting, ruling, and governing New England in America.” This company functioned from 1620-1635.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Healthy Beaches Program
    Maine Healthyyg Beaches Program: The State of Maine’s Beaches in 2009 MiMaine Beach es C on ference July 10, 2009 Keri Lindberg Fundinggp provided by: US EPA Program Coordinator, UMaine Cooperative Extension/ Maine Sea Grant Sarah Mosley, Mark Margerum, Program Manager, UMaine Cooperative Extension ME Department of Environmental Protection Long Sands Beach, York, ME Geometric Mean 40 35 30 ls mm 25 20 mpn/100 15 10 5 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 YK-6 YK-13 YK-8 YK-16 YK-10 YK-18 YK-11 EPA Safety Level Long Sands Beach, York, ME Potential Bacteria Sources: 9Stormwater Runoff 9Residential/Commercial Development 9Boats 9Bathers 9Wildlife 9Pet Waste Cape Neddick Beach, York, ME Geometric Mean 40 35 30 25 20 pn/100 mls 15 m 10 5 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 YK-2 EPA Safety Level Cape Neddick Beach, York, ME Potential Bacteria Sources: Aliht&NtStAccomplishments & Next Steps: 9Cape Neddick River Outlet 9Town Hired a Shoreland 9Malfunctioning Septic Systems Resource Officer 9Stormwater Runoff 92007-2009 Cape Neddick River Special Study 9Residential/Commercial Development 9In 2008, Selectmen unanimously supported Plan of Work for 2009 9Boats 9Bathers 9Wildlife 9PtWPet Was te Ogunquit Beaches, Ogunquit, ME Geometric Mean 40 35 30 ls 25 20 15 mpn/100 m 10 5 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 OG-1 OG-4 OG-2 OG-5 OG-3 EPA Safety Level 2005 – 2009 Ogunquit River Special Study Potential Bacteria Sources: 9Ogunquit River Outlet 9Malfunctioning Septic Systems 9Stormwater Runoff 9Residential/Commercial Development 9Sanitary Sewer Outfall 9Bathers 9Wildlife 9Pet Waste 2005 – 2009 Ogunquit River Special Study 9Maine Geological Survey Acoustic Doppler Profiling Study & Data Analysis 94 separate current zones and 1 sub-zone 9Oggqunquit River = p rimar y source of contamination 9Wave ht >4 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS of MAINE an Analysis Of
    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS OF MAINE An Analysis of Avian Diversity and Abundance Compiled by: Susan Gallo, Thomas P. Hodgman, and Judy Camuso A Project Supported by the Maine Outdoor Heritage Fund IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS OF MAINE An Analysis of Avian Diversity and Abundance February 7, 2008 Compiled by: Susan Gallo, Maine Audubon, 20 Gilsland Farm Rd., Falmouth, ME 04105 Thomas P. Hodgman, Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 650 State St., Bangor, ME 04401 Judy Camuso, Maine Audubon, 20 Gilsland Farm Rd., Falmouth, ME 04105 (Present Address: Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 358 Shaker Road, Gray, ME 04039) Recommended citation: Gallo, S., T. P. Hodgman, and J. Camuso, Compilers. 2008. Important Bird Areas Of Maine: an analysis of avian diversity and abundance. Maine Audubon, Falmouth, Maine. 94pp. Cover Photo: Scarborough Marsh at sunrise, by W. G. Shriver ii Table of Contents History ..........................................................................................................................................1 What is an Important Bird Area?.......................................................................................1 Qualifying Criteria...................................................................................................................1 Data Use and Applicability Disclaimer .............................................................................2 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Fall 2020 Watermark
    FALL 2020 volume 37 issue 2 watermark Published by Laudholm Trust in support of Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve Working Together Toward Habitat Resilience inside • Flotsam / News Briefs • Nik’s Notebook: 2020 • New Research Fellow coastal communities long enough subjected to the enormous • Solar Power Update • Regional Resilience Plan Wander and you will find water over a roadway stress that tidal pressure can put • We Had Visitors at high tide. Locals know the spots where flooding has been on its bed, particularly when the • FY 2020 Financials • What to Do for Winter an occasional inconvenience. There’s a fair chance they have only passage for that water is noticed that flooding happens more often these days, and they not big enough. With overtopping and undercutting, eventually may know that sea level rise projections portend overtopping something has to give. will become more frequent during future high tides. One such spot is Sawyer Road, which links Cape Elizabeth Coincident Concerns Back in 2017, the reserve’s restoration project manager, Jacob to Scarborough over the Spurwink River. A bridge once spanned Aman, was working with The Nature Conservancy on a stream the Spurwink here, but it was replaced by a culvert first in 1963 connectivity project, compiling a list of priority sites for then again in 1997. The current culvert is aluminum, about 12 restoration. As part of their outreach, they met with the Cape feet wide by 11 feet high, and too small. Elizabeth planner and public works director about Sawyer Road Undersized culverts restrict the natural ebb and flow of and another Spurwink River road crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Shellfish Laws and Regulations Michelle Mason Webber
    Maine State Library Maine State Documents Marine Resources Documents Marine Resources 1-2013 Compilation of Shellfish Laws and Regulations Michelle Mason Webber Maine Department of Marine Resources Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalmaine.com/dmr_docs Recommended Citation Webber, Michelle Mason and Maine Department of Marine Resources, "Compilation of Shellfish Laws and Regulations" (2013). Marine Resources Documents. Paper 1. http://digitalmaine.com/dmr_docs/1 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Marine Resources at Maine State Documents. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marine Resources Documents by an authorized administrator of Maine State Documents. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPILATION OF SHELLFISH LAWS AND REGULATIONS MAINE DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCES REVISED JANUARY 2013 PUBLIC LAWS OF THE STATE OF MAINE RELATING TO MARINE RESOURCES This handbook only contains information relating to shellfish and shellfish harvesting activities. The word “shellfish”, as defined in statute, includes the following species: clams, quahogs, oysters and mussels; and includes shellstock and shucked shellfish. We have made an effort to provide full and complete information on all laws pertaining to all types of shellfish, for the convenience of all concerned. The reader should be advised that the contents are subject to change between publications. The reader will notice that certain numbers have been omitted from various sections. This has been done to eliminate the sections that do not pertain to shellfish, thus giving the reader a more concise reference material. Further information may be obtained by writing to the Department of Marine Resources, 21 State House Station, Augusta, ME 04333, or by contacting one of our Marine Patrol Officers (see pages 194-195 for a listing).
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Elizabeth Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents
    CAPE ELIZABETH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Vision and Executive Summary 2 1. Demographics 4 2. Economy 15 3. Housing 29 4. Transportation 47 Transportation Map 48 5. Public Facilities 62 Public Facilities and Sewer Service Areas Map 63 6. Fiscal Capacity 79 7. Recreation and Open Space 87 Open Space and Trails Map 88 8. Marine Resources 101 Marine Resources Map 102 9. Water Resources 106 Water Resources Map 107 10. Critical Natural Resources 113 Wetlands Map 114 Coastal Resources Map 118 Floodplain Map 119 11. Agricultural and Forestry Resources 121 Agricultural Resources Map 122 12. Historical and Archeological Resources 128 Historic Resources Map 130 13. Regional Coordination 135 14. Land Use Plan 138 Zoning and Geographic Areas Map 140 1 Subdivision History Map 143 Building Permit History Map 145 15. Implementation Time Frame 153 2 VISION The vision represented by this Comprehensive Plan is to preserve Cape Elizabeth as a highly desirable community in which to live by the following: expanding open spaces and accessible trails; encouraging the preservation of working farms; continuing the current slow pace and pattern of development; maintaining excellent educational and municipal services; cultivating the Town Center as a mixed use commercial area; supporting the high levels of citizen involvement in town activities; and balancing services and costs. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Comprehensive Plan Committee met 29 times, including 3 public forums. A statistically valid telephone survey was conducted to gauge resident opinions. Like any town engaging in a comprehensive plan process, the Cape Elizabeth Comprehensive Plan Committee incorporated into their deliberations a sense of the townSs assets, liabilities, challenges and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood of October 1996 in Southern Maine by Glenn Hodgkins and Gregory J
    Flood of October 1996 in Southern Maine by Glenn Hodgkins and Gregory J. Stewart U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4189 Prepared in cooperation with the FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY uses Augusta, Maine science for a changing world 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Acting Director For additional information Copies of this report can contact: be purchased from: Chief, Maine District USGS Information Services U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286 26 Ganneston Drive Denver, CO 80225 Augusta, Me 04330 Telephone: (303) 202-4200 Telephone: (207) 622-8201 CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Purpose and Scope 1 Acknowledgments 2 Antecedent Hydrologic Conditions 2 Streamflows 2 Rainfall 2 Storm Characteristics 2 Rainfall Amounts 4 Rainfall Frequency 5 Description of Flood 6 Peak Water-Surface Elevations 6 Peak Flows 6 Peak-Flow Frequency 20 Extrapolation of Peak-Flow Frequency 21 Reservoir Storage 22 Flood Damages 23 Historical Perspective on Flood 23 Historical Peak Flows 24 Historical Peak Water-Surface Elevations 25 Summary and Conclusions 26 References Cited 27 FIGURES 1. Map showing location of study area and selected points 3 2. Graph showing daily rainfall totals from September 1, 1996 to October 19, 1996 at Portland International Jetport 4 3. Graph showing cumulative rainfall from October 20-22, 1996 at Portland International Jetport 5 4. Photograph showing aerial view of Presumpscot River at Route 302 in Westbrook, Maine on October 22, 19967 5. Photograph showing Presumpscot River at Route 302 in Westbrook, Maine on October 22, 19967 6.
    [Show full text]
  • COASTAL MAINE S If R Nahraflve REPORT Jal^UARY - DECEMBER 1966 COASTAL MINE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
    7^ COASTAL MAINE S If R NAHRAflVE REPORT JAl^UARY - DECEMBER 1966 COASTAL MINE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Newburyport, I-fes sachusett s NARRATIVE REPORT Jan. - Dec. 1966 REFUGE PERSONNEL During this period of initial acquisition, the Coastal Maine National Wildlife Refuge was administered "by personnel of the Parker River National Wildlife Refuge. NARRATIVE REPORT COASTAL MAINE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Jan. - Dec. 1966 General On July 26, 1966 the MBCC authorized the acquisition of the three southern-most units of the Coastal Maine National Wildlife Refuge, specifically the Lower Wells Marsh, the Moody Beach Marsh, and the Brave Boat Harbor Marsh. The refuge was officially established on December 16, 1966 when the first land tract totaling l6 acres on the Lower Wells unit was acquired by the Government. The ultimate acreage to be acquired with duck stamp monies will form a National Wildlife Refuge of approximately 4,308 acres. Since no data was taken for this period, no weather information, wildlife population figures, or narrative report forms will be included in this report. However, an initial section on history, not ordinarily included in a narrative report, will be presented. The Coastal Maine National Wildlife Refuge, lying along the south­ ern coast of Maine will consist of ten units. All are located be­ tween Kittery Point and Portland, Maine along the Atlantic coast east of U.S. Route 1. The southern-most unit is 35 miles north of the Parker River National Wildlife Refuge and the northern-most unit is 235 miles southwest of the Moosehorn National Wildlife Refuge. The individual units are as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphodynamics of Tidal Inlet Systems in Maine
    Maine Geological Survey Studies in Maine Geology: Volume 5 1989 Morphodynamics of Tidal Inlet Systems in Maine 1 2 Duncan M. FitzGeraui, Jonathan M. Lincoln • 3 1 L. Kenneth Fink, Jr. , and Dabney W. Caldwel/ 1Departm ent of Geology Boston University Boston, Massachusetts 02215 2Department of Geological Sciencies Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois 60201 3Department of Geology University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 ABSTRACT The occurrence of tidal inlets along the coast of Maine is tied closely to the structural geology and glacial history of this region. Most of the inlets are found along the southern arcuate-embayment shoreline where sand sources, consisting of glaciomarine sediments and other glacial deposits, were sufficient to build swash-aligned barriers between pronounced bedrock headlands. Along the peninsula coast of Maine, tidal inlets also occur at the mouths of the Kennebec and Sheepscot Rivers where large quantities of glaciofluvial sands were deposited during deglacia­ tion. The remainder of the southeastward facing coast was stripped of its preglacial sediment cover by the southerly moving glaciers. The thin tills that were left behind yield little sand and, thus, barriers and inlets are generally absent. Small to large-sized inlets (width= 50-200 m) in Maine are anchored next to bedrock outcrops and are bordered on their opposite sides by sandy spits. Despite the ubiquitous name "river inlet," they normally have little fresh water discharge compared to their salt water tidal prisms. The backbarriers of these inlets are expansive and would produce relatively large tidal prisms if high Spartina marshes had not filled most of the region, leaving little open water area.
    [Show full text]