DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada 2011 BCSC 1588 Reference re: Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Reference re: Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada, 2011 BCSC 1588 Date: 20111123 Docket: S097767 Registry: Vancouver In the Matter of: The Constitutional Question Act, R.S.B.C. 1986, c 68 And In the Matter of: The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms And in the Matter of: A Reference by The Lieutenant Governor In Council Set Out in Order In Council No. 533 dated October 22, 2009 concerning the Constitutionality of s. 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 Before: The Honourable Chief Justice Bauman Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Attorney General of Craig E. Jones British Columbia: Leah R. Greathead Karen Horsman Sarah A. Bevan Eva L. Ross Freya Zaltz Deborah J. Strachan Counsel for the Attorney General of Canada: R. Keith Reimer R. Craig Cameron Robert J. Danay B.J. Wray Counsel for the Reference Amicus: George K. Macintosh, Q.C. Ludmila B. Herbst Tim A. Dickson Counsel for the Interested Persons: Beyond Borders: Ensuring Global Justice for Children: David Matas British Columbia Civil Liberties Association: Monique Pongracic-Speier British Columbia Teachers’ Federation: Robyn P.M. Trask file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/fmorrow.GLOBEANDMAIL/Desktop/Polygamy%20reference%20case.htm[23/11/2011 1:04:17 PM] 2011 BCSC 1588 Reference re: Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada Canadian Association for Free Expression: Douglas H. Christie Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children and the Brent B. Olthuis David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights: Cheryl L. Milne Stephanie McHugh Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Assoc.: John G. Ince As Agent Christian Legal Fellowship: Gerald D. Chipeur, Q.C. Oleh W. Ilnyckyj Jill W. Wilkie Phebe Chan Ruth Ross, as Agent James Marion Oler and the Fundamentalist Church of Robert V. Wickett Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints: Matthew G. Siren Andrew W.T. Scarth REAL Women of Canada: Jonathan Baker Stop Polygamy in Canada: Brian M. Samuels Robert J.C. Deane Kieran A.G. Bridge Jennifer W. Chan West Coast Legal Education and Janet Winteringham, Q.C. Action Fund: Deanne Gaffar Kasari J. Govender Place and Dates of Trial: Vancouver, B.C. November 22-26, 30, 2010 December 1, 2, 7-9, 13, 15, 16, 2010 January 5-7, 10-13, 17-20, 25-28, February 7-9, March 28-31, April 1, 4, 11-13, 15, 2011 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, B.C. November 23, 2011 Table of Contents Paragraph Range I. INTRODUCTION [1] - [15] II. COURSE OF PROCEEDINGS [16] - [44] A. The Reference Questions [16] - [17] B. The Participants [18] - [25] C. The Evidence [26] - [32] D. Webcast of Final Submissions [33] - [44] III. EVIDENTIARY ISSUES [45] - [127] A. Factors Justifying a Liberal Approach to Admissibility in a Trial Reference [46] - [58] file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/fmorrow.GLOBEANDMAIL/Desktop/Polygamy%20reference%20case.htm[23/11/2011 1:04:17 PM] 2011 BCSC 1588 Reference re: Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada 1. The Importance of Evidence in Charter Litigation [47] - [51] 2. The Potential of a Trial Reference [52] - [58] B. Legislative Facts and Judicial Notice [59] - [70] 1. Legislative and Adjudicative Facts [60] - [62] 2. Judicial Notice [63] - [70] C. Expert Evidence [71] - [103] 1. Angela Campbell [77] - [103] a) Preconditions to Admissibility [80] - [88] b) Cost-Benefit Analysis [89] - [103] D. Lay Witnesses [104] - [105] E. The Brandeis Brief [106] - [127] 1. Canadian Use of Brandeis Brief Materials [109] - [121] 2. Use of Materials in the Brandeis Brief [122] - [127] IV. POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES [128] - [133] V. THE EVIDENCE [134] - [851] A. Terminology [135] - [145] B. The Historical Context [146] - [233] 1. The Emergence of Modern Monogamy [147] - [167] 2. Philosophical Dimensions of Western Monogamy [168] - [233] a) Classical Foundations [170] - [179] b) Biblical Foundations of Monogamy [180] - [187] c) Early Christian Teachings [188] - [193] d) The Medieval Views on Monogamy and Polygamy [194] - [202] e) Protestant Views of Monogamy and Polygamy [203] - [206] f) The Enlightenment [207] - [217] g) The Common Law Inheritance [218] - [227] h) Polygamy Linked to Harms [228] - [233] C. Polygamy Globally [234] - [336] 1. Islam [238] - [255] a) Polygyny in the Qur’an [242] - [249] b) Muslim State Practice [250] - [255] 2. Mormonism [256] - [336] a) Brief History of the Mormon Church [258] - [305] i. Plural Marriage [264] - [277] ii. Criminalization of Polygamy [278] - [305] b) Mormon Fundamentalism [306] - [333] i. The FLDS [316] - [333] c) Polygamy in American Constitutional Law [334] - [336] D. Polygamy in Canada [337] - [467] 1. The History of Polygamy in Canada [337] - [380] file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/fmorrow.GLOBEANDMAIL/Desktop/Polygamy%20reference%20case.htm[23/11/2011 1:04:17 PM] 2011 BCSC 1588 Reference re: Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada a) First Nations Polygamy [341] - [346] b) Mormon Polygamy [347] - [356] c) Criminalization of Polygamy [357] - [359] d) First Nations and Mormon Polygamy After Criminalization [360] - [380] 2. Bountiful [381] - [422] a) Police Investigations Relating to Bountiful [393] - [422] 3. Muslim Community [423] - [429] 4. Polyamory [430] - [460] 5. Wicca [461] - [467] E. Changing Family Demographics in Canada [468] - [481] F. Alleged Harms of Polygamy [482] - [793] 1. Evolutionary Psychology [493] - [576] a) Dr. Henrich [498] - [539] i. Polygyny’s Creation of a Pool of Unmarried Low-Status Men [507] - [517] ii. Polygyny’s Effects on Male Parental Investment [518] - [522] iii. Polygyny, Age of marriage, the Age Gap and Gender Equality [523] - [533] iv. More Speculative Predictions [534] - [539] b) Dr. Shackelford [540] - [553] c) Will Polygamy Spread in Canada? [554] - [576] 2. Literature Review [577] - [608] 3. Statistical Analysis [609] - [640] 4. Polygamy in Contemporary North America [641] - [745] a) Polygamy in The United States [645] - [701] i. Fundamentalist Mormons [645] - [691] ii. Muslim Community [692] - [701] b) Polygamy in Canada [702] - [745] i. Bountiful [702] - [744] ii. Muslim Community [745] - [745] 5. Stereotyping Adherents of Minority Religious Groups [746] - [758] 6. Position of the Challengers [759] - [778] 7. Summary of Apprehended Harms [779] - [793] G. Canada’s International Obligations [794] - [851] 1. Canada’s Obligations under International Treaties [800] - [840] a) Statements by International Treaty Bodies [804] - [832] i. CEDAW [813] - [816] ii. ICCPR [817] - [820] iii. CRC [821] - [826] iv. ICESCR [827] - [832] b) Arguable Limitations on a State’s Ability to Criminalize Polygamy [833] - [840] 2. Customary International Law [841] - [843] file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/fmorrow.GLOBEANDMAIL/Desktop/Polygamy%20reference%20case.htm[23/11/2011 1:04:17 PM] 2011 BCSC 1588 Reference re: Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada 3. Comparative Law [844] - [851] VI. PURPOSE AND INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 293 [852] - [1042] A. Purpose of Section 293 [854] - [904] 1. Legislative History of Section 293 [854] - [877] 2. Conclusion on Purpose of Section 293 [878] - [904] B. Interpretation of s. 293 [905] - [1042] 1. Positions of the Parties [905] - [968] 2. Conclusion on Interpretation of s. 293 [969] - [1042] VII. THE CHARTER [1043] - [1357] A. Freedom of Religion [1048] - [1098] 1. Positions of the Parties [1049] - [1082] a) Purpose [1052] - [1060] b) Effect [1061] - [1082] 2. Conclusion [1083] - [1098] B. Freedom of Expression [1099] - [1105] 1. Positions of the Parties [1099] - [1102] 2. Conclusion [1103] - [1105] C. Freedom of Association [1106] - [1127] 1. Positions of the Parties [1106] - [1123] 2. Conclusion [1124] - [1127] D. Liberty and Security of the Person [1128] - [1226] 1. Positions of the Parties [1128] - [1176] a) Interests at Stake [1130] - [1138] i. Liberty [1130] - [1134] ii. Security of the Person [1135] - [1138] b) Principles of Fundamental Justice [1139] - [1176] i. Overbreadth [1142] - [1148] ii. Arbitrariness [1149] - [1156] iii. Gross Disproportionality [1157] - [1165] iv. Consent [1166] - [1173] v. Vagueness [1174] - [1176] 2. Conclusion [1177] - [1226] E. Equality [1227] - [1270] 1. Positions of the Parties [1227] - [1258] a) On the ground of religion [1230] - [1235] b) On the ground of marital status [1236] - [1258] 2. Conclusion [1259] - [1270] F. Section 1 [1271] - [1357] 1. Positions of the Parties [1276] - [1328] a) Pressing and Substantial Objective [1278] - [1283] file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/fmorrow.GLOBEANDMAIL/Desktop/Polygamy%20reference%20case.htm[23/11/2011 1:04:17 PM] 2011 BCSC 1588 Reference re: Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada b) Proportionality [1284] - [1328] i. Rational Connection [1284] - [1298] ii. Minimum Impairment [1299] - [1305] iii. Proportionality of Effects [1306] - [1328] 2. Conclusion [1329] - [1357] a) Section 2(a) [1330] - [1352] b) Section 7 [1353] - [1357] VIII. DISPOSITION [1358] - [1367] 1. Is Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada consistent with the Canadian [1359] - [1362] Charter of Rights and Freedoms? If not, in what particular or particulars and to what extent? 2. What are the necessary elements of the offence in s. 293 of the Criminal Code [1363] - [1367] of Canada? Without limiting this question, does s. 293 require that the polygamy or conjugal union in question involved a minor or occurred in a context of dependence, exploitation, abuse of authority, a gross imbalance of power, or undue influence? Page Range APPENDIX “A” [336 - 357] I. INTRODUCTION [1] By s. 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, (initially in 1890 and periodically since then in successive revisions to the Code), Parliament has prohibited the practice of polygamy. British Columbia asks this Court to declare whether this prohibition is consistent with the freedoms guaranteed to all Canadians by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part 1 of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act, 1982 (U.K.), 1982, c.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence
    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 2004 Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence Elizabeth F. Emens Columbia Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Family Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Elizabeth F. Emens, Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence, 29 N.Y.U. REV. L. & SOC. CHANGE 277 (2004). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/410 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MONOGAMY'S LAW: COMPULSORY MONOGAMY AND POLYAMOROUS EXISTENCE' ELIZABETH F. EMENSt I. Introdu ction .................................................................................................. 2 78 II. Com pulsory M onogam y ............................................................................... 287 A . M onogam y's M andate ....................................................................... 287 1. The Western Romance Tradition ................................................. 288 2. Stories from Biological Anthropology .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monogamy, Polygamy, and Polyamory in American Society 1
    MONOGAMY, POLYGAMY, AND POLYAMORY IN AMERICAN SOCIETY 1 The most debatable topics of the 21st century are monogamy, marriage, and sexuality. We live in the world where the words “homosexual” and “the same-sex-marriage” are our everyday reality. We hear and read about it all the time. Sometimes we get involved into heated discussions on whether homosexuals should have the right to get married or they should have open relationships. We even love to watch the popular TV series “Big Love” about openly polygamous couples. In these series, the women involved into polygamous relationships were portrayed as well-educated and independent women that had made a conscious choice of polygamy. The end of these series has also represented the general population’s view about polygamy and polyamory as the models of alternative relationships. Bill’s neighbor killed him to show his protest against the basic beliefs about marriage constitution. It was a symbolic presentation of general population’s opinion about polygamy as a system. It is very interesting to see the progression of the American society to the point when the hot topics like these do not create a shock in a general population, but make the points for discussions. How did we get to this point? What are monogamy, non-monogamy, poligamy, and poliamory? How do they affect us? Why do many people react negatively to polyamory? How do debates about same-sex-marriages and polyamory affect each other? Why is our reaction to these topics changing? All these questions create a lot of tension in our society.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing with Fire: an Ethnographic Look at How Polyamory Functions in the Central Florida Burner Community
    University of Central Florida STARS HIM 1990-2015 2015 Playing with Fire: An Ethnographic Look at How Polyamory Functions in the Central Florida Burner Community Maleia Mikesell University of Central Florida Part of the Anthropology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015 University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIM 1990-2015 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Mikesell, Maleia, "Playing with Fire: An Ethnographic Look at How Polyamory Functions in the Central Florida Burner Community" (2015). HIM 1990-2015. 613. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015/613 PLAYING WITH FIRE: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC LOOK AT HOW POLYAMORY FUNCTIONS IN THE CENTRAL FLORIDA BURNER COMMUNITY by MALEIA MIKESELL A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Honors in the Major Program in Anthropology In the College of Sciences and in the Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, FL Spring Term 2015 Thesis Chair: Dr. Beatriz Reyes-Foster Abstract This thesis asks the question as to whether polyamory functions as a community glue or solvent for the Central Florida Burner Community. It explores the definition of polyamory and how it relates to the Burner counter-culture. This thesis explores what polyamory’s effects are on the individual and community levels for those who participate in it. The findings concluded that overall the participants reported a perceived positive impact on both the individual level and on community cohesion in this case.
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence Elizabeth Emens
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers Working Papers 2004 Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence Elizabeth Emens Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ public_law_and_legal_theory Part of the Law Commons Chicago Unbound includes both works in progress and final versions of articles. Please be aware that a more recent version of this article may be available on Chicago Unbound, SSRN or elsewhere. Recommended Citation Elizabeth Emens, "Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence" (University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 58, 2004). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Working Papers at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHICAGO PUBLIC LAW AND LEGAL THEORY WORKING PAPER NO. 58 MONOGAMY’S LAW: COMPULSORY MONOGAMY AND POLYAMOROUS EXISTENCE Elizabeth F. Emens THE LAW SCHOOL THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO February 2003 This paper can be downloaded without charge at http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/publiclaw/index.html and at The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=506242 1 MONOGAMY’S LAW: COMPULSORY MONOGAMY AND POLYAMOROUS EXISTENCE 29 N.Y.U. REVIEW OF LAW & SOCIAL CHANGE (forthcoming 2004) Elizabeth F. Emens† Work-in-progress: Please do not cite or quote without the author’s permission. I. INTRODUCTION II. COMPULSORY MONOGAMY A. MONOGAMY’S MANDATE 1. THE WESTERN ROMANCE TRADITION 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage, Law and Polyamory. Rebutting Mononormativity with Sexual Orientation Discourse?
    Oñati Socio-legal Series, v. 6, n. 6 (2016) – Radically Rethinking Marriage ISSN: 2079-5971 Marriage, Law and Polyamory. Rebutting Mononormativity with Sexual Orientation Discourse? CHRISTIAN KLESSE ∗ Klesse, C., 2016. Marriage, Law and Polyamory. Rebutting Mononormativity with Sexual Orientation Discourse?. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 6 (6), 1348-1376. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2891035 Abstract This paper traces the genealogy of sexual orientation discourse in US legal scholarship and explores potential drawbacks of the articulation of a sexual orientation argument in the field of relationship recognition. After a long period of refraining from campaigning for legal recognition of multi-partner relationships, polyamory activists have recently shown a stronger interest in litigation. This paper identifies reasons for this shift in recent successes of the campaign for same-sex marriage rights and critically discusses proposals to frame polyamory as a sexual orientation to achieve multi-partner marriage rights through litigation. I argue that advocating a sexual orientation model of polyamory is likely to reduce the complexity and transformative potential of poly intimacies, limit the scope and reach of potential litigation, obstruct the capacity of poly activism to form alliances and increase the likelihood of poly activism to settle for legal solutions (i.e. marriage) that are exclusive and reproductive of a culture of privilege. Key words Polyamory; sexual orientation; compulsive monogamy; mononormativity; polygamy; slippery slope; multi-partner marriage; same-sex marriage Resumen Este artículo traza la genealogía del discurso sobre orientación sexual en las investigaciones jurídicas de Estados Unidos y explora los posibles inconvenientes de la articulación de un argumento de orientación sexual en el campo del reconocimiento de parentesco.
    [Show full text]
  • Queering Polyamory: Configurations, Public Policy, and Lived Experiences
    Queering Polyamory: Configurations, Public Policy, and Lived Experiences By Timothy Joseph Gardner A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Master of Science in Ethnic and Multi-cultural Studies College of Behavioral and Social Sciences Minnesota State University, Mankato Mankato, Minnesota May 2005 ii iii This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA. iv ABSTRACT Gardner J. Timothy 2005 Queering Polyamory: Configurations, Public Policy, and Lived Experiences. M.S. thesis, Ethnic and Multi-cultural Studies, Minnesota State University, Mankato, 100 leaves. “Queering Polyamory: Configurations, Public Policy, and Lived Experiences” explores polyamory, a relationship “lovestyle” that involves more then one loving partner, while taking a close look at the social construction of modern day queer polyamory including marriage and sex law. The author states that queer polyamory is socially constructed due to its inclusion of self-identifying gay men, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, gender-variant, omnisexual, pansexual, and queer individuals. This thesis includes a study of participants involved in queer polyamorous relationships. The study concludes that a population that engages in queer polyamorous relationships is diverse in regards to demographics; this is to say state of residence, age, gender, ethnicity, religious/spiritual affiliation, sexual identity and/or orientation, and relationship identity and/or orientation and ways individuals come to be part of queer polyamorous relationships. The study looks at how “out” the participants are and how public policy is affecting the lives of those who engage in queer polyamorous relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Polyamory
    Understanding Polyamory Unitarian Universalists and Responsible Multi-Partnering What is polyamory ? Polyamory is the potential for loving more than one person within a given period of time. Here we’ll define “love” as a serious, intimate, romantic, stable, affectionate bond which a person has with another person or group of people. Responsible non-monogamy is another way of saying polyamory, and it is used to distinguish polyamory from “cheating.” Polyamory is a general term covering a wide variety of relationship styles, including group marriage (polyfidelity), open marriage, expanded family, intimate network, and some kinds of intentional community. Polyamory is a relationship choice available to people of any sexual orientation. Sometimes language familiar to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people is used to describe aspects of living as a polyamorous person (such as "coming out" as polyamorous). However, there are polyamorous people of all sexual orientations, just as there are monogamous people of all sexual orientations. What is the connection between polyamory and Unitarian Universalism? Unitarian Universalists are drawn together by the shared need to discover our own truth rather than accepting any existing dogma. We come together to share our findings, but primarily we come together to share our questions. Is it any wonder that some of us also reject dogma and choose to live in the questions in the sexualoving aspects of our lives? Many polyamorists practice, in diverse ways, a strong integration of sexuality and spirituality. Who are you people? We are Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness (UUPA), a national organization of Unitarian Universalists interested in polyamory. UUPA is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Punishing Family Status
    PUNISHING FAMILY STATUS JENNIFER M. COLLINS,∗ ETHAN J. LEIB,∗∗ AND DAN MARKELℵ INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1329 I. AN OVERVIEW OF FAMILY STATUS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE BURDENS ........................................................................................... 1334 A. Omissions Liability for Failure to Rescue................................. 1335 B. Parental Responsibility Laws .................................................... 1338 C. Incest ......................................................................................... 1343 D. Bigamy....................................................................................... 1345 E. Adultery ..................................................................................... 1346 F. Nonpayment of Child Support ................................................... 1347 G. Nonpayment of Parental Support .............................................. 1348 II. A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING FAMILY TIES BURDENS ................ 1349 A. A Defendant-Centered Perspective, Among Others .................. 1350 1. The Defendant as the Object of Punitive Coercion ............. 1350 2. Family Members as the Object of Harm ............................. 1350 3. Burdens as Devices for Promoting “Family Life and Values”................................................................................ 1351 ∗ Associate Professor of Law, Wake Forest University School of Law; B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard. ** Associate Professor
    [Show full text]
  • Sexuality Terms and Definitions
    Sexuality Terms and Definitions Ally – An individual whose attitudes and behaviors are supportive of all sexual orientations, anti-heterosexist, and who is active in combating homophobia and heterosexism, both on a personal and institutional level. Asexual – A person who is not sexually attracted to anyone or does not have a sexual orientation. They may or may not experience romantic attraction. Bear – The most common definition of a ‘bear’ is a man who has facial/body hair, and a cuddly body. However, the word ‘bear’ means many things to different people, even within the bear movement. ‘Bear’ is often defined simply as a sense of comfort with natural masculinity and bodies. Biphobia – The fear of, discrimination against, or hatred of bisexuals, which is often times related to the current binary standard. Biphobia can be seen within the LGBTQI community, as well as society as a whole. Bisexuality – A sexual orientation in which a person has the potential to feel physically and emotionally attracted to more than one gender. Butch – A person who identifies themselves as masculine, whether it be physically, mentally or emotionally. ‘Butch’ is sometimes used as a derogatory term for lesbians, but it can also be claimed as an affirmative identity label. Coming Out – Also, “coming out of the closet” or “being out,” this term refers to the process through which a person acknowledges, accepts, and in many cases appreciates their LGBTQIA+ identity. This often involves sharing of this information with others. It is not a single event but instead a lifelong process. Down Low – To hide ones same-sex attractions and relationships while outwardly engaging in different-sex relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multiplicity of Desire: Polyamory and Relationship Counselling
    A multiplicity of desire: Polyamory and relationship counselling Barbara Baumgartner Barbara Baumgartner is a counsellor and practitioner of narrative ideas who currently lives and works in Vancouver, Canada. Email: [email protected] Reflecting on a personal and professional journey, this paper invites readers to consider prevailing ideas of monogamy and its effects on relationship counselling. The term and practice of polyamory are introduced, highlighting how society’s training in monogamy obscures this choice. An interview with experience consultants challenges some of the myths of polyamorous relationships and makes suggestions for counsellors. Keywords: polyamory, poly relationships, monogamy, narrative therapy, relationship counselling, queer, feminism, heteronormativity The International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work The International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work 59 2009 No. 2 www.dulwichcentre.com.au 2009 No. 2 www.dulwichcentre.com.au INTRODUCTION When I started meeting people who were in loving and respectful open relationships or had What would relationship counselling look like if multiple lovers, I was curious about this. I it took seriously the challenges posed by what is remember talking with a friend who was so now referred to as polyamory? For those who have comfortable and matter-of-fact about her sexuality not heard of the phrase ‘polyamory’, it refers to the and her various lovers. There was nothing salacious practice of deliberating and openly choosing to love about her descriptions and it was also clearly no big more than one person. It is a departure from deal to her. In her life, and her community, it was monogamous thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Types of Love in Polyamory: Between Primary and Secondary Haojun (Vivie) Jiang Western University, [email protected]
    Western University Scholarship@Western Undergraduate Honors Theses Psychology Department Spring 4-2017 Different Types of Love in Polyamory: Between Primary and Secondary HaoJun (Vivie) Jiang Western University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychd_uht Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Jiang, HaoJun (Vivie), "Different Types of Love in Polyamory: Between Primary and Secondary" (2017). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 40. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychd_uht/40 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychology Department at Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Running head: DIFFERENT TYPES OF LOVE IN POLYAMORY 1 Different Types of Love in Polyamory: Between Primary and Secondary HaoJun Jiang Honors Psychology Thesis Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, CANADA April, 2017 Thesis Advisor: Lorne Campbell, Ph.D Co-Advisor: Rhonda N. Balzarini, Ph.D Candidate Running head: DIFFERENT TYPES OF LOVE IN POLYAMORY 2 Abstract Polyamory is a relationship model where every partner involved in the relationship practices or consents to the practice of multiple simultaneous relationships. Polyamory typically consists of at least two partners, and the most common model is the primary-secondary relationship. Previous research found higher intimacy, commitment,
    [Show full text]
  • Polyamory and Its 'Others': Contesting the Terms of Non
    04 069986 Klesse (to_d) 6/11/06 8:40 am Page 565 Article Abstract Drawing on qualitative in-depth interviews with bisexual-identified practitioners of polyamory in the UK, this article shows that love, intimacy and friendship are salient themes in polyamory discourses. An exploration of the question of how respondents define polyamory with regard to different ‘styles of non-monogamy’ reveals that the boundaries of polyamory are contested within the movement that has formed around this concept. The prevalent definition of polyamory as ‘responsible non-monogamy’ usually goes hand in hand with a rejection of more sex- or pleasure-centred forms of non-monogamy, such as ‘casual sex’, ‘swinging’, or ‘promiscuity’. The author argues that the salience of the relational ideologies of love and intimacy hampers the potential of polyamory to ground a truly pluralistic sexual ethics. Keywords friendship, intimacy, love, polyamory, promiscuity Christian Klesse Manchester Metropolitan University, UK Polyamory and its ‘Others’: Contesting the Terms of Non-Monogamy In the years between 1997 and 2003 I researched gay male and bisexual non-monogamous relationship practices in the UK. One of my major research interests was to explore what discourses on non-monogamy circulate within the debates on sexual politics in the gay male and bisexual movements. I deployed a combination of qualitative methods, inclusive of qualitative interviews, focus groups, documentary research, participant observation, and discourse analysis. I conducted 44 interviews with gay men, bisexual men and women with significant experience in non- monogamous relationship practice.1 About the half of my sample consisted of gay-identified men. The other half identified as bisexual or lived in a bisexual context.
    [Show full text]