UNC School of Pharmacy Self-Study Report Volume II — Appendices Graduate Program Review April 13-15, 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNC School of Pharmacy Self-Study Report Volume II — Appendices Graduate Program Review April 13-15, 2008 UNC School of Pharmacy Self-Study Report Volume II — Appendices Graduate Program Review April 13-15, 2008 Appendices for general section A. M.S. in Hospital Pharmacy Administration (for PPEE div) & Course Proposal/Course Information Form B. Graduate student orientation program agenda & Need to Know Guide C. Teaching and Research Assistantship D. Student awards E. Parental Leave F. Subcommittee document for PharmD/PhD program G. Student survey H. Alumni survey I. Administrative structure J. Recruitment strategy Appendix A MS in Health Pharmacy Administration & Course Proposal/Course Information Form UNC School of Pharmacy Fall 2007 Course Proposal / Course Information Form School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill General Instructions: The attached form is to be completed for all new professional and graduate courses and for reorganization or major changes in existing courses. A proposal for course revision is expected with each change of course director or with significant changes (>20%) in course topics or instructors. The intent of this form is to provide information necessary for appraisal of course content, pedagogical approaches to conducting the course, and its relationship to and coordination with other courses in the core curriculum or with electives from the same division, other divisions within the School, or other University departments. The Curriculum Committee requests that sufficient information be provided to allow judgment of the merit of the proposed course of study, to compare proposed content to that of existing areas of instruction, and to assess allocation of semester hours to the proposed area of instruction. Where applicable, the information may be provided in the form of a proposed course syllabus. Deadline for Submission of Course Proposals: August 1 for courses to be taught as soon as the following Spring Semester February 1 for courses to be taught as soon as the following Fall Semester 1. Proposal Type _____ New course proposal _____ Revised course proposal Current Title: ___________________________________________________ Abbreviation: ___________ Number: __________ Credit Hours: ________ Type of Change (check all that apply): ____ content _____course director _____instructors _____credit hours ____ course title ____ course description ____ other (specify)___________________________ To be offered: _____ fall _____ spring semester(s), effective ____________________ 2. Course Director(s): _________________________________________________________ 3. Course Title and Catalog description (Course title and catalog description should indicate the nature of the course and its content as concisely as possible). Title: ____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Catalog description (Please limit the description to 25-30 words): ___________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ 4. Course format: Hours / week Section size Lecture Lab Recitation / discussion ____ required for professional students ____ professional elective ____ graduate elective ____ required for graduate students in ________________________________________ (division / program) Expected distribution of course registrants: ______PY1 ______PY2 ______PY3 ______PY4 ______graduate 5. Course prerequisites (list specific courses, e.g. PHCO 56, not pharmacology) _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ 6. Classroom technology needed: ____ overhead projector ____ slide projector ____ computer _____ internet connection ____ other (please specify) ___________________________________________________ 7. Course content and organization (attach documents as needed) a. List proposed topics, ideal lecture sequence, and amount of time to be devoted to each topic. Please detail any specific sequencing requirements (i.e. which topics must precede others in order to provide a logical sequence of study that prepares students adequately for subsequent topics). b. State the desired / expected learning outcome(s) for each topic for students who participate in the course. (i.e. explain / describe what students are expected to learn or do as a result of instruction for each topic). 8. Curricular integration and continuity (attach documents as needed) a. Please describe your efforts to coordinate / align the content of this course with prior, concurrent, and/or subsequent courses in the core curriculum (including Pharmaceutical Care Labs) b. Please describe your efforts to coordinate / align the content of this course with defined curricular learning outcomes (Doctor of Pharmacy or graduate program) c. Identify and justify any overlap with other courses either in the required curriculum or elective offerings. Course Proposal Form, Rev 12/2001 UNC School of Pharmacy Page 2 9. Instructional approaches and materials a. Please indicate the approximate percentage of time each of the following instructional methods is used in this course? _____ Lecture _____ Problem-solving / technique practice _____ Large class discussion _____ Role-playing or simulation exercises _____ Small group discussion / recitation _____ Case / problem-based activities _____ Demonstration of concepts / techniques _____ Laboratory experiments b. Which of the following assignment types are used in this course. ______ Preparatory reading / self-directed or self-study assignments ______ Small group or _______independent projects ______ Writing assignments _______ Other (specify)_____________________________________________________________ c. Which of the following teaching materials are used in this course? (check all that apply) ⎯ Textbook(s) ⎯ Commercial web-based materials ⎯ Journal articles ⎯ Self-developed web-based materials ⎯ Self-developed print materials ⎯ Discussion boards Other(please specify)________________________________________________ Please list title(s) and author(s) of required texts or software, etc. d. The AACP Center for the Advancement of Pharmaceutical Education (CAPE) Advisory Panel on Educational Outcomes developed a set of learning outcomes in 1994 as a suggested model for guiding curricular development and evaluation in U.S. Schools of Pharmacy. In addition to discipline-specific professional outcomes, the report recommends that pharmacy curricula also address the general learning abilities listed below. Please briefly describe teaching strategies or methods used in this course to promote abilities in each of these areas. (Definitions can be found in the resource section of AACP’s web site at http://www.aacp.org/Resources/resources.html) • Critical Thinking • Communication • Personal / professional values and ethical decision-making • Social and Contextual awareness • Social Responsibility • Social Interaction • Self-learning abilities Course Proposal Form, Rev 12/2001 UNC School of Pharmacy Page 3 10. Continuity of instruction a. How many faculty participate in the delivery of this course? b. Is each faculty member provided specific teaching / learning objectives for his/her session(s)? _____ Yes _____ No c. When does the course director attend sessions lead by other faculty members? _____ Never _____ Occasionally, on a random basis _____ Only when a faculty member presents a topic for the first time _____ Usually, based on availability _____ Always d. What additional efforts are made to maximize continuity between multiple instructors in the course? 11. Communication with students a. How are course requirements, performance expectations, assignments, and grading criteria communicated to students? (check all that apply) ____ printed syllabus ____ in-class review ____ course web-site ____ postings to a bulletin board ____ other (please specify ___________________________________________ ) b. What mechanisms do you use to communicate information to students outside of class? (check all that apply) ____ e-mail to class ____ internet discussion board ____ course web-site ____ postings to bulletin board ____ other (please specify ___________________________________________ ) c. How do you encourage students to seek / receive assistance outside of class? (check all that apply) ____ regular office hours, course director ____ e-mail to course director ____ regular office hours, course instructors ____ e-mail to instructors ____ regular office hours, teaching assistant ____ e-mail to teaching assistant ____ by telephone to course director ____ by telephone to instructors ____ by telephone teaching assistant ____ no suggestions given to students ____ other (please specify__________________________________________) Course Proposal Form, Rev 12/2001 UNC School of Pharmacy Page 4 12. Student Evaluation and Grading a. What methods are used to evaluate student performance in this course? ____ written quizzes / exams ____ lab reports ____ written homework assignments ____ oral examinations ____ papers or project reports ____ performance assessment (e.g. presentations, technical skills, class participation) ____ other (please specify) ___________________________________________________________
Recommended publications
  • Chapel Hill-FINAL 3.17.04
    Market Analysis Report For Proposed Redevelopment of Lots 2 & 5,Town of Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, North Carolina For Stainback Public/Private Real Estate LLC (SPPRE) Submitted by Economics Research Associates March 17, 2004 ERA Project No. 15344 1101 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 750 Washington, DC 20036 202.496.9870 FAX 202.496.9877 www.econres.com Los Angeles San Francisco San Diego Chicago Washington DC London New York Table of Contents Section I: Introduction 1 Section II: Summary 6 Section III: Residential 10 Section IV: Retail 27 Section V: Arts & Entertainment 52 Section VI: Parking 73 Section VII: Case Studies 76 Section VIII: Conclusion 98 Appendix I: Data Sources 100 1101 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 750 Washington, DC 20036 202.496.9870 FAX 202.496.9877 www.econres.com Los Angeles San Francisco San Diego Chicago Washington DC London New York I. INTRODUCTION Downtown Chapel Hill (Downtown), with its eclectic mix of retail, office, and residential uses and its proximity to the University of North Carolina campus has historically been the cultural and commercial nerve center of Chapel Hill and the neighboring areas. However, like similar downtowns across the country, it has been transformed from its role as the primary commercial center to a largely secondary position. In particular, Downtown Chapel Hill has experienced two major forces over the past few decades that have contributed to this evolution: (i) the emergence, and subsequent growth, of Research Triangle Park that has altered employment and demographic patterns in the region, and (ii) the emergence of stand-alone shopping malls that have managed to attract a growing share of residents to the detriment of Downtown establishments.
    [Show full text]
  • Choi Still Missing, Presumed Drowned Graduate Dies in Car Accident
    Scoring one for equality The Colorado Silver Bullets, professional baseball Learn, visited THE CHRONICLE Durham last Saturday. See pg. 24. URSDAY. MAY 30. 1996 S ONE COPY FREE DUKE UNIVERSITY DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA CIRCULATION: 9,000 VOL. 92, NO. S3 Choi still missing, Graduate dies in car accident presumed drowned Babcock remembered for his 'spirit of adventure' By MISTY ALLEN the evening of By BRIAN HARRIS everyone by his middle name, cock, told The Herald-Sun of The. Vermont State PoHce, May 17. WINSTON-SALEM, N.C— brought to this world. Camp­ Durham. "He loved to travel, after searching the Connecti­ Lt. Philip Lombardi of the In a tremendous demonstra­ bell most vividly recalled Bab- and he loved the ocean. He al­ cut and Passumpsic Rivers for St. Johnsbury division of the tion of love and support, more cock's undying spirit of adven­ ways wanted to be close to the nearly two weeks Vermont State Po­ than 1,000 people gathered at ture. ocean." for Trinity sopho­ lice said that rising the Centenary United That spirit was the focus of Babcock was riding May 24 more Sei Hee water levels—trig­ Methodist Church Wednesday the conversation Campbell had in the passenger seat of his car Choi, have pre­ gered by New Eng­ to celebrate the life of Stephen­ with Babcock May 11, the in San Quentin, Mexico, when sumed her dead. land Power Co.'s son Pope Babcock, Trinity '96, night before graduation. Bab­ a severe gust of wind forced State officials decision to release who was killed in a car acci­ cock, who received a B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Chapel Hill Retail Market Study
    Custom Map ©2011 Esri On-demandRETAIL reports and maps from Business MARKET Analyst Online. Order at www.esri.com/bao ANALYSIS or call 800-447-9778 6/15/2011 Chapel Hill, North Carolina Part Two: Existing Conditions, Local and Regional Trends and Strategic Considerations July 2011 Town of Chapel Hill Retail Market Study Prepared for The Town of Chapel Hill TABLE OF CONTENTS by Glossary 4 Development Concepts, Inc. Section 1: Existing Conditions 6 1236 East 16th Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46202 Section 2: Retail Trends 21 and Section 3: Conclusions 30 Gentleman McCarty 405 Bent Tree Lane Indianapolis, Indiana 46260 2 Town of Chapel Hill Retail Market Study OVERVIEW This Study examines the existing conditions and major Key questions and issues that this Study aimed to address trends related to commercial retail development, both were: within the Town of Chapel Hill and its environs, as well as the larger Triangle region of Raleigh, Cary, Durham and • Verification of the findings from Nielson Claritas using Chapel Hill. This analysis is intended to provide information complimentary information and analysis; to the Town of Chapel Hill for the purpose of crafting a development strategy relative to future retail development. • A thorough inventory and analysis of Chapel Hill’s existing retail businesses and centers; This Report, the second part of the Town’s Retail Market Study initiative, is intended to assist Chapel Hill in • Examination of the regional demographic and retail examining opportunities to expand its non-residential tax trends surrounding Chapel Hill that have a direct base. The first part was an analysis of the market within influence on the Town’s capacity to add retail the Town of Chapel Hill by Nielson Claritas in 2008.
    [Show full text]